Hispandering La Raza Democrats Obama and Pelosi spent 8 years sabotaging Homeland
Security and American voting so that the invaders will elect all future
Presidents!
VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY LIKE TEXAS’ NARCOMEX BORDER
COUNTIES THAT VOTED VIVA BETOMATIC?
BETO O’ROURKE HAS BEEN ENDORSED BY MEXICO. HOW IMPORTANT
WILL THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES BE?
*
“In 2018, a volunteer for the Beto campaign urged
followers to transport undocumented aliens (ILLEGALS) to the polls.”
*
“Many
liberals believe that anyone in the United States – citizen or non-citizen –
should be able to vote. If they want to make that argument and
change the law to make it happen, they are more than welcome to
try. Of course, if they run on that issue, they will get slaughtered
at the polls. So instead of going to the American people and working
to change the law, they try an underhanded dirty trick to achieve the same
goal.” APOLO VILLALOBOS
"American elites continue focusing on a
global order while ignoring the decline of the United States. A broken America
will be unable to meet any geopolitical threats abroad. Any national security
strategy that does not begin with securing our own national security at home
will be doomed to fail." DANIEL GREENFIELD
Knowing that the wall
will become a reality if the President gets the cash brings out the
cheap-labor-express, wealthy power brokers like the Billionaires
for Open Borders: Michael Bloomberg; Rupert Murdoch; other distinguished
members of the Forbes 500; and, as Lou Dobbs often reminds us, the
"globalists, the Chamber of Commerce, the Business Roundtable, Koch
brothers and Wall Street."
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/12/rep-beto-orourke-celebrates-his.html
O’Rourke tweeted his support for
hundreds of undocumented people into American communities.
*
“Many thanks to volunteers & donors who
ensure that we take care of families being released by ICE in El Paso. 200 to
be released today. Over 500 tomorrow.” BETO O’ROURKE
*
We’ve got an even
more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or
the reconquest of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas into the country of
Mexico….. AND THE ENEMY IS THE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY!
THE PELOSI DOCTRINE:
SERVE BILLIONAIRES WITH EVEN CHEAPER LABOR AND EVEN WIDER OPEN BORDERS.
MORE MONEY LOST FROM FOOD STAMP FRAUD THAN IS SPENT ON A WALL TO DEFEND
AMERICAN AGAINST THE LA RAZA HEROIN CARTELS OPERATING OVER, UNDER AND IN OUR
OPEN BORDERS!
Exclusive: Conservatives Unite Against H.R. 1, ‘Ultimate Fantasy of the Left’
5:53
WASHINGTON, DC – Over 150 conservative leaders nationwide released a “Memo to the Movement” from the Conservative Action Project on Monday, declaring that they are opposed to the Democrats’ kick-off legislation H.R. 1, which would profoundly shift elections toward liberal candidates and open the door to rampant voter fraud, calling Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s bill “the ultimate fantasy of the left.”
“Conservatives are united in opposing H.R. 1, the attempt by House Democrats to fundamentally undermine the American electoral system,” the Memo begins.
It explains several key features of Pelosi’s inaugural legislation, outlining how it is designed to ensure that a liberal Democrat wins the White House in 2020 and the Left gains unified control of Congress and well as take over state governments.
Breitbart TV
The Democrats’ bill violates the First Amendment. It restricts political speech and election activities in several ways that the U.S. Supreme Court has made crystal clear violates the Constitution, such as groups’ pooling resources to take out ads on the issues those groups advocate.
Pelosi’s legislation is a massive federal power grab away from the states. The Constitution gives primary authority to the sovereign states to conduct elections. This bill empowers the federal government to micromanage elections by requiring states to get “preclearance” from Washington, D.C., before changing their election procedures.
H.R. 1 also mandates countless millions of taxpayer dollars be given to candidates for their campaigns, requiring citizens to fund candidates who those citizens actually oppose for office.
The Memo highlights several other features of the bill, including:
- Forces all states to allow all convicted felons to vote.
- Requires all states to allow same-day voter registration, which leads to voter fraud.
- Makes it difficult for a state to discover if a voter is also voting in another state.
- Prevents states from limiting early voting.
- Prevents states from limiting voting by mail.
- Requires all states to provide free mail-in absentee ballots.
- Criminalizes political speech that the government deems “discouraging” to voters who are statistically more likely to vote Democrat.
- Takes redistricting away from elected leaders to give to left-leaning commissions.
Many of these items are statistically more likely to increase Democrat and liberal votes over Republican and conservative votes. For example, most felons vote for Democrats, and people who do not register to vote until the last minute lean left as well.
Others increase the odds of voter fraud and intimidation. The most secure method of voting is in a government building on Election Day. Early voting, voting by mail, automatically registering people to vote when they get s driver’s license, and allowing a person to register for the first time on Election Day, are each more susceptible to fraudulent votes or for voters to be intimidated regarding who they should vote for.
Moreover, electioneering messages that are said to “discourage” voting are typically conservative messages that various left-wing minority voter groups attack as “voter suppression.” Making such messages a federal crime creates the possibility of conservative groups being prosecuted by the U.S. government, chilling their willingness to participate in elections at all.
A constellation of 154 national conservative stars signed the Memo to the Movement, including:
Edwin Meese III, former Attorney General of the United States
Alfred Regnery, Chairman, Conservative Action Project
Ken Blackwell, former Ohio Secretary of State and U.S. Ambassador
Jim DeMint, former U.S. Senator and President of the Heritage Foundation
David McIntosh, President, Club for Growth and former Member of Congress
Tony Perkins, President, Family Research Council and Council for National Policy
L. Brett Bozell, III, President, Media Research Center
Ken Cribb, former White House Domestic Policy Advisor to President Reagan
Charles Cooper, former U.S. Assistant Attorney General for Legal Counsel
Bob McEwan, former Member of Congress
Marjorie Dannenfelser, President, Susan B. Anthony List
Tom Fitton, President, Judicial Watch
Matt Schlapp, Chairman, American Conservative Union
Jenny Beth Martin, Chairman, Tea Party Patriots Citizen Fund
Stuart Epperson, Chairman, Salem Media Group
David Bozell, President, For America
Curt Levey, President, Committee for Justice
Hans von Spakovsky, former Commissioner, Federal Election Commission
Susan Carleson, CEO, American Civil Rights Union
Christian Adams, President, Public Interest Legal Foundation
Bill Walton, Chairman, CNP Action
Lt. Gen. Jerry Boykin (ret.), Executive Vice President, Family Research Council
Grover Norquist, President, Americans for Tax Reform
Gary Bauer, President, American Values
James Miller III, former Director, White House Office of Management and Budget
Colin Hanna, President, Let Freedom Ring
Tom McClusky, President, March for Life Action
Myron Ebell, Competitive Enterprise Institute
Gary Marx, President, Madison Strategies
Diana Bannister, President, Shirley & Bannister
Cleta Mitchell, Attorney
Phil Kerpen, President, American Commitment
Sal Russo, Co-Founder, Tea Party Express
Elaine Donnelly, President, Center for Military Readiness
Mario Lopez, President, Hispanic Leadership Fund
- Read the full Memo here.
Texas Finds
95,000 Non-US Citizens Registered To Vote -- 58,000 Have Actually Voted In
Recent Elections
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2019/01/25/texas-finds-95000-nonus-citizen-registered-to-vote-58000-have-actually-voted-in-recent-elections-n2540285
On Friday January 25,
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced that 95,000 individuals
registered to vote in the Lone Star State have been identified as "Non-US Citizens,"
meaning they are illegally registered to vote. Further evidence brought forth
by Texas Secretary of State David Whitely confirms that 58,000 of
these individuals have broken the law and voted in "one or more"
recent elections.
“Every single instance
of illegal voting threatens democracy in our state and deprives individual
Texans of their voice," AG Paxton said in a statement. "My Election
Fraud Unit stands ready to investigate and prosecute crimes against the
democratic process when needed."
Texas Finds
95,000 Non-US Citizens Registered To Vote -- 58,000 Have Actually Voted In
Recent Elections
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2019/01/25/texas-finds-95000-nonus-citizen-registered-to-vote-58000-have-actually-voted-in-recent-elections-n2540285
On Friday January 25,
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced that 95,000 individuals
registered to vote in the Lone Star State have been identified as "Non-US Citizens,"
meaning they are illegally registered to vote. Further evidence brought forth
by Texas Secretary of State David Whitely confirms that 58,000 of
these individuals have broken the law and voted in "one or more"
recent elections.
“Every single instance
of illegal voting threatens democracy in our state and deprives individual
Texans of their voice," AG Paxton said in a statement. "My Election
Fraud Unit stands ready to investigate and prosecute crimes against the
democratic process when needed."
Texas Democrats asking non-citizens to vote
The Public Interest Legal Foundation has alerted the Justice
Department to a gambit by Texas Democrats to get non-citizens to vote.
The state party sent out a voter registration form asking
non-citizens to sign up, with the citizenship box already checked
"yes."
The Public Interest Legal Foundation alerted district attorneys
and the federal Justice Department to the pre-checked applications, and also
included a signed affidavit from a man who said some of his relatives, who
aren't citizens, received the mailing.
"This is how the Texas Democratic Party is inviting
foreign influence in an election in a federal election cycle,"
said Logan Churchwell, spokesman for the PILF, a group that's made its
mark policing states' voter registration practices.
The Texas secretary of state's office said it, too, had gotten
complaints both from immigrants [sic] and from relatives of dead people who
said they got mailings asking them to register.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott vowed to investigate.
"If true there will be serious consequences," he said.
This is an open invitation for voter fraud on a large scale, and
the way the Democrats went about it defies belief:
The applications were pre-addressed to elections officials, which
is likely what left many voters to believe they were receiving an official
communication from the state.
But the return address was from the State Democratic Executive
Committee, and listed an address in Austin that matches the
state Democratic Party's headquarters.
The letter is emblazoned with "Urgent! Your voter
registration deadline is October 9." It continues: "Your
voter registration application is inside. Complete, sign and return
it today!"
On the application, boxes affirming the applicant is both 18 and a
U.S. citizen are already checked with an "X" in the Yes field.
The mailing also urges those who are unsure if they're registered
to "Mail it in."
Dead people were also being asked to vote.
Sam Taylor, spokesman for Texas's secretary of state, said they
heard from people whose relatives were receiving mail despite having passed
away 10 years ago or longer. One woman said her child, who'd been
dead 19 years, got a mailing asking to register.
"It looks like a case of really bad information they are
using to send out these mailers," Mr. Taylor said.
Mr. Taylor is being very charitable. I doubt very much
whether it's "bad information" being used by Democrats.
How many other state Democratic Parties send out similar requests
to non-citizens and haven't been caught? Are we to believe that one
party in one state came up with this idea all on its own? Perhaps,
but not likely.
Many liberals believe that anyone in the United States – citizen
or non-citizen – should be able to vote. If they want to make that
argument and change the law to make it happen, they are more than welcome to
try. Of course, if they run on that issue, they will get slaughtered
at the polls. So instead of going to the American people and working
to change the law, they try an underhanded dirty trick to achieve the same goal.
Someone should go to jail for this ruse.
Safe Spaces: How Sanctuary
Cities are Giving Cover to Noncitizens on the Voter Rolls
Public Interest Legal Foundation, August
2018
https://publicinterestlegal.org/files/Safe-Spaces_Final.pdf
CALIFORNIA DMV GIVES ILLEGAL VOTERS A
SURGE
“New” and “underrepresented” voters could spell victory for leftist
Democrats in November.
September
12, 2018
Last week
California’s Department of Motor Vehicles sent 23,000 “erroneous”
voter registrations to the office of Secretary of State Alex
Padilla, who maintains the list of registered voters. The DMV blamed it
technical errors and said none of the erroneous registrations involved
undocumented immigrants. Padilla was “extremely disappointed and deeply
frustrated” and the DMV assured him it wouldn’t happen again.
Legitimate voters have good
reason to believe Padilla was not disappointed but delighted. The odds are
strong that illegals make up most if not all of the newly registered voters.
The registrations of illegals will be happening again, in greater numbers, as
the November election approaches.
The day after the 23,000
registrations made news, it emerged that from late April to early August,
the DMV registered 182,000 “new voters,” with the largest
number, 112,000, choosing “no party.” Neither the DMV nor Padilla would explain
the numbers but the trend is evident and all by design.
Under a 2015 voter
registration law, the DMV automatically registered to vote those who obtain or
renew a California driver’s license. As Padilla told the Los
Angeles Times, “We’ve built the protocols and the firewalls to
not register people that aren’t eligible. We’re going to keep those firewalls
in place.” The Democrats’ Secretary of State did not explain how the firewalls
worked and if any ineligibles had managed to vote.
After the 2016 election
in which Donald Trump defeated Hillary Clinton, Padilla refused to release any
voter information to a federal probe that he claimed “has already inaccurately passed judgment that millions of
Californians voted illegally.” California’s
participation, Padilla said in a statement, “would only serve to legitimize the
false and already debunked claims of massive voter fraud made by the
president.”
Back in 2015, Padilla
told the Los Angeles Times, “At the latest, for the 2018 election
cycle, I expect millions of new voters on the rolls in the state of
California.” True to form, by March, 2018, more than one million “undocumented” immigrants received
licenses.
The DMV has been under
fire for incompetence, with wait times up to six hours and retention of state
employees who sleep on the job. Legislators resisted calls for an audit and gave DMV boss
Jean Shiomoto another $16 million to hire new employees. Thus equipped, the massive
state agency is cranking out “new voters” for November. The DMV claim that
“none” of them is ineligible fits the pattern of leading Democrats who believe
everybody in the state is a legal resident.
Governor Jerry Brown, who
three times ran for president, calls Californians “the citizens of the fifth largest economy in the world,” and the sanctuary
state law protects even violent criminal illegals. The ruling Democrats protect
illegals while promising them “free” health care and other benefits. In return,
the illegals vote for Democrats.
“Palestinian-Mexican
American” candidate Ammar Campa-Najjar, is the grandson of Black September
terrorist Muhammad Yusuf al-Najjar, who masterminded the murder and mutilation
of 11 Israelis at the Munich Olympics in 1972. The Democrat, 29, is depending on “underrepresented voters,” to unseat Rep. Duncan
Hunter in San Diego.
Legitimate voters have
good reason to consider “underrepresented” as code for “ineligible” or
“illegal.” For their part, legal citizens and immigrants might wonder how
the Munichian candidate’s father managed to enter
the United States and what the family was doing in Gaza for several years.
Ammar isn’t telling and establishment journalists look the other way.
Senate boss Kevin de
León, whose name on his birth certificate voter rolls is Kevin
Alexander Leon, claims his father is a Chinese cook born in
Guatemala. The author of the state’s sanctuary law spent time on both sides of
the border and “identifies strongly with Mexican culture.” The story defies
belief but as with Najjar the establishment media mounted no investigation.
Kevin Alexander Leon
seeks to replace Dianne Feinstein in the U.S. Senate. He has narrowed Feinstein’s lead to single digits and that stream of
“new” voters from the DMV could push him over the line.
POTUS 44 has endorsed
Campa-Najjar, who worked on his reelection campaign in 2012. The president
formerly known as Barry Soetoro has been campaigning openly for Democrat Gil
Cedillo, who is running for Congress in California’s 39th district. Cedillo has been accused of sexual harassment by fellow
Democrat and documentary filmmaker Melissa Fazli. That does not trouble
the former president, and Cedillo could also benefit from those “new” voters.
As a State Department
investigation discovered, false-documented illegals have been voting in local,
state and federal elections for decades. That may explain how a
state that twice voted for Ronald Reagan and booted out three of Jerry Brown’s state supreme court
picks, including chief justice Rose Bird, became a Democrat
stronghold.
Back in 1996 in Orange
County, 442 illegals voted for Loretta Sanchez, the Democrat who
narrowly defeated Republican Robert Dornan. He was the target of Hermandad
Mexicana Nacional founder Bert Corona, a violent Stalinist who
opposed Dornan’s strong anti-Communist stance.
Despite Democrat denials,
voter fraud was going strong in California long before the DMV registered more
than one million false-documented illegals. It’s a safe bet that most if not
all those ineligibles will be showing up at the polls in November.
U.S. Election Meddling: Nationwide Voter Fraud, Importation of 15M
Foreign-Born Voters
Shelby Lum, Richmond
Times-Dispatch via The Associated Press
19 Jul 2018Washington, D.C.2,070
As
the establishment media, GOP, and Democrats fret over the influence foreign
countries have on U.S. elections, the leading threats to the American
electorate remain nationwide voter fraud and mass immigration.
Though President Trump’s administration
sought to thoroughly investigate voter fraud through the
Presidential Commission on Election Integrity, the board
was handed off to
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in order to bypass obstruction from
national Democrats who refused to turn over voter data.
Voter
Fraud
The number
of convictions against voter fraud continues to rise, with now nearly 940
criminal convictions on the books across the U.S., according to the
latest data from the Heritage Foundation.
Likewise,
the number of cases of voter fraud has risen. Heritage’s Voter Fraud Database
now features 1,071 cases of voter fraud that spans across 47 states.
In the most recent study by
the Government Accountability Institute (GAI) on voter fraud, the think tank
found 8,471 high likely cases of double voting. About 7,271 of those
cases were inter-state double voting, while the remaining 1,200 cases were
of intra-state double voting.
“The
probability of correctly matching two records with the same name, birthdate,
and social security number is close to 100 percent,” the GAI report noted.
Kansas Secretary of State and gubernatorial candidate
Kris Kobach is fighting in his state to enforce voting laws that would mandate
voters prove their U.S. citizenship. This effort has currently been
halted by the left-wing ACLU organization and a circuit judge who recently
claimed that it was unconstitutional for a state to demand voters provide
their U.S. citizenship records. Years ago, proof of citizenship voting laws
were upheld as fully constitutional.
“Compare
[Russia meddling in the 2016 presidential campaigns] to the kind of foreign
influence in the actual election numbers in foreign nationals voting,” Kobach
told Breitbart News. “That’s real and much more consequential and it’s
happening all over the country.”
Kobach said his expert witness in the
suit with the ACLU over the proof of citizenship law revealed that as many as
33,000 foreign nationals are on the voter rolls in Kansas. For states like
California, with the largest foreign-born population in the country, the number
of foreign nationals on the voter rolls is likely in the hundreds of thousands
or even the millions, Kobach says.
Mass Immigration
Similarly, mass legal and illegal
immigration to the U.S. continues to be the largest driver of population
increases and demographic shifts in the country. Every year, more than 1.5
million immigrants are admitted to the country. The U.S. has imported more
than ten million immigrants in the last decade.
The vast majority of foreign nationals
arrive through the process known as “chain migration,” where newly naturalized
citizens can bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the U.S. Every
two new immigrants to the country bring an additional seven foreign relatives
with them.
As Breitbart News has extensively reported, the
U.S. is on track to import about 15 million foreign-born voters by the year
2038. That is nearly quadruple the size of the annual number of U.S.
births; about four million American babies are born every year.
Through
chain migration alone, the U.S. will import about eight million foreign-born
voters in the next two decades.
The
country’s continued mass immigration policies are likely to hand over electoral
dominance to Democrats in statewide and national elections, Breitbart News has
noted.
Analysis
conducted by Axios’s Chris Canipe and Andrew Witherspoon shows the
overwhelming trend of foreign-born populations voting Democrats into office
over Republicans.
The victory of socialist Democrat Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez in New York’s 14th District is the latest case where a booming
foreign-born voting population pushed the far-left activist over the edge to
beat out establishment, high ranking Democrat Rep. Joe Crowley.
Ocasio-Cortez’s
district is close to 50 percent foreign-born, a drastic shift of an area that
was once populated primarily by native-born Americans. Ocasio-Cortez ran her
congressional campaign on abolishing all immigration enforcement across the U.S.
In California, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) is
facing a challenge from State Senator Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles), and
the California Democratic Party has endorsed León. The far-left challenger
was the key proponent of California’s sanctuary state law that protects
criminal illegal aliens from being deported.
University of
Maryland, College Park researcher James Gimpel has found in recent years that more immigrants to the
U.S. inevitably means more Democrat voters and thus, increasing electoral
victories for the Democratic Party.
In 2014, Gimpel’s research concluded with three
major findings:
·
Immigrants,
particularly Hispanics and Asians, have policy preferences when it comes to the
size and scope of government that are more closely aligned with progressives
than with conservatives. As a result, survey data show a two-to-one party
identification with Democrats over Republicans.
·
By increasing
income inequality and adding to the low-income population (e.g. immigrants and
their minor children account for one-fourth of those in poverty and one-third
of the uninsured) immigration likely makes all voters more supportive of
redistributive policies championed by Democrats to support disadvantaged
populations.
·
There is evidence
that immigration may cause more Republican-oriented voters to move away from
areas of high immigrant settlement leaving behind a more lopsided Democrat
majority.
Years ago, only a handful of elected Democrats would
mention how the demographic shift spurred by mass immigration was a benefit to
Democrats electorally. Today, it is a widely used talking point of elected
Democrats.
Take San Antonio, Texas Mayor Julian Castro,
for example. Months ago, Castro admitted that immigration could potentially turn
the state of Texas, Florida, and Arizona into Democrat strongholds, like
California.
✔
The Hispanic vote in Texas will continue to increase. By 2024 Democrats can
win Texas, Arizona and Florida. A big blue wall of 78 electoral votes.
✔
“The Democrats
have now become very open about what they are doing and they state it very
clearly,” Kobach said of the Democrats’ use of immigration for shifting the
electorate.
“Now, multiple
Democrats are saying their plan is to import new voters to change elections,”
Kobach said.
In an analysis from Georgetown University, the
University of California, and Banque de France, researchers discovered
that immigration to the country continuously increases Democrats’ chances of
winning elections:
On average across election types,
immigration to the U.S. has a significant and negative impact on the Republican
vote share, consistent with the typical view of political analysts in the U.S.
[Emphasis added]
This average effect – which is driven by elections in the House – works through
two main channels. The impact of immigration on
Republican votes in the House is negative when the share of naturalized
migrants in the voting population increases. Yet, it can be
positive when the share of non-citizen migrants out of the population goes up
and the size of migration makes it a salient policy issue in voters’ minds.
[Emphasis added]
These results are consistent with
naturalized migrants being less likely to vote for the Republican Party than
native voters and with native voters’ political preferences moving towards the
Republican Party because of high immigration of non-citizens. This second
effect, however, is significant only for very high levels of immigrant
presence. [Emphasis added]
In 2016, the legal and illegal immigrant population reached a record high
of 44 million. By 2023, the Center for Immigration Studies estimates that the legal and illegal immigrant
population of the U.S. will make up nearly 15 percent of the entire U.S.
population.
Mexico has the
largest group of legal and illegal foreign nationals in the U.S., with 1.1
million immigrants from the country arriving in the U.S. between 2010 and 2016.
Mexican nationals make up roughly one in eight new arrivals to the U.S. On
average, every one Mexican immigrant brings six foreign relatives with them to
the country through chain migration.
MEXICO WILL
ELECT ALL FUTURE AMERICAN PRESIDENTS… Now go and watch the pols hispander!
If the illegals are violent criminals, de Leon, governor Jerry
Brown and attorney general Xavier Becerra believe they are still better people
and protect them from deportation. And this fall one million illegals could be voting in California alone.
CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATS' VOTING SCAM
https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/270524/california-democrats-voting-scam-lloyd-billingsley
The Golden State does favors for illegal immigrants -- who may return
the favor at the voting booth.
June 22, 2018
“The
California state budget on Gov. Jerry Brown’s desk puts tens of millions of
dollars into programs that could help undocumented immigrants fight federal
efforts to deport them,” the Sacramento Bee reports, “including opening up
$10 million to hire lawyers for unaccompanied minors trying to stay in the
U.S.” For that crowd, the Democrats’ $200 billion budget has even more to give.
The
budget “expands funding for immigration legal services offered through the
Department of Social Services and public colleges,” and “includes $1.6 million
to build a team of eight attorneys and investigators in the Labor
Commissioner's office at the Department of Industrial Relations.” This team
will enforce AB 430, “a state law that requires businesses to tell their
employees when they’re contacted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.” As
the report notes, “employers face penalties of $2,000 to $10,000 if they fail
to notify their workers of a pending immigration action.”
Last
year’s budget “put $45 million into providing legal services to immigrants,”
which the Department of Social Services deploys to “hire nonprofit
organizations that will work on immigration cases.” The new funding “steers
some of that money directly to colleges. It gives $10 million to community
colleges for immigration legal services, $7 million to the California State
University system and $4 million to the University of California.” Still, it’s
not done.
“The
upcoming budget also more than triples legal funding for undocumented minors,”
The Bee reports. “Last year, the Department of Social
Services received $3 million for those cases. In the next budget, the
department gets $10 million to help young undocumented immigrants.”
David
Chiu, the San Francisco Democrat who wrote AB 430, explains that “Donald
Trump’s out-of-control deportation force is constant threat to our immigrant
communities.” While Trump Derangement Syndrome is doubtless a factor, taxpayers
might consider the upcoming mid-term elections.
As
the Los Angeles Times reported in 2015,
California’s 2015 voter registration law “is intended to streamline the process
of signing up to vote and encourage more participation in elections.” It
kicks in “when people go to the DMV to obtain or renew a driver's license.”
Politicians deny that anybody will be automatically registered to vote.
“We’ve
built the protocols and the firewalls to not register people that aren’t
eligible,” secretary of state Alex Padilla told the Times. “At
the latest, for the 2018 election cycle, I expect millions of new voters on the
rolls in the state of California.” He got them.
According
to the DMV, as of March 2018, more than one million undocumented immigrants have
received driver’s licenses. Did any vote in the 2016 presidential
election?
California
Senator Dianne Feinstein denies that widespread voter fraud occurs and Alex
Padilla refuses to release data from voter rolls. So legal residents and
taxpayers have good reason to wonder what he is hiding.
State
legislators who take an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution now reward the
violation of immigration law, and punish those who approve and follow federal
law. The largesse for illegals also violates state law, the 1996 Proposition
209, which bars ethnic preferences in state education, employment and
contracting.
California
state universities privilege illegals with in-state tuition and as the budget
shows, even pay their legal bills. Neither would apply to a legal African
American or Asian American student from Michigan or Nevada. Senate boss Kevin
de Leon also violated state law by giving preference to Mexican national Lizbeth Mateo, or whatever her real
name is, for a post on the California Student Opportunity and Access Program
Project Grant Advisory Committee.
So California violates
state law, defies federal law and budgets tens of millions of dollars for
millions of illegals, the vast majority Mexican nationals. They get protection
from the federal government, preference in education, and even payment of their
legal bills. In return, they vote for California Democrats, in the style of
Mexicans who vote for the dominant Partido Revolucionario
Institucional (PRI) party in return for favors.
In
effect, California Democrats are a branch of the PRI and form a Mexican
occupational government (MOGO) serving the interests of false-documented
Mexican nationals.
Assembly
speaker Anthony Rendon wants the state to “step up and work with Mexico” instead of the U.S.
federal government. Normally those who represent the interests of foreign
governments are required to register as agents of those governments.
Meanwhile,
California has given driver’s licenses to more than one million illegals. The
federal government should verify how many of that group show up to vote this
fall. As a
State Department investigation confirms, false documented illegals do vote repeatedly in federal, state,
and local elections. Illegal voting is a serious crime and so is human
trafficking.
The
false-documented “unaccompanied minors” who get $10 million in the budget are
those whose parents chose to break up their own families and put their own children
into the hands of criminal smugglers. California’s MOGO regime is okay with
that and even rewards it.
Back
in 1987, governor George Deukmejian returned $1.1 billion directly
to the people “to protect this money for the taxpayers.”
California now has a budget surplus of $9 billion but governor Jerry
Brown returns nothing to the people and ignores crumbling infrastructure and
fathomless pension debt. The three-time presidential loser would rather spend
taxpayers’ money to protect people who aren’t supposed to be here.
I.R.S.
ILLEGALS STOLEN 1.3 MILLION IDENTITIES!
THEY
STEAL SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS TO STEAL JOBS, DRIVE ILLEGALLY, CONTRACT IN THE
TRADES ILLEGALLY, AND VOTE FOR MORE ILLEGALLY and do it by invitation of the
Democrat Party!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/03/irs-documets-13-million-identity-thefts.html
Mexicans cheat,
distribute drugs, lie, forge documents, STEAL and kill as if it’s a normal
way of life. For them, it is. Mexico’s civilization stands diametrically
opposed to America’s culture. FROSTY WOOLDRIDGE
''California is going to be a Hispanic state,"
said Mario Obeldo, former head of MALDEF. "Anyone who does not like it
should leave."
(THIS IS DATED. MEXICO NOW HAS INVADED ALL STATES )
And M.E.Ch.A's goal is even more radical: an
independent ''Aztlan,'' the collective name this organization gives to the seven states of the U.S.
Southwest – Arizona, California,
Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas and Utah."
The letter notes that the percentage in L.A.
County may be as high as 144%.
JUDICIAL
WATCH:
ILLEGALS
VOTING IN MASSIVE NUMBERS IN MEX-OCCUPIED CA
‘Eleven of California’s 58 counties have
registration rates exceeding 100% of the age-eligible
citizenry.’
‘California has the highest rate of inactive
registrations of any state in the country. Los Angeles County has the highest
number of inactive registrations of any single county in the country’
Judicial
Watch Warns California: 11 Counties Have More Voters than Voting-Age Citizens
Justin Sullivan / Getty
Judicial Watch, a conservative watchdog organization, has sent a
letter to California Secretary of State Alex Padilla on behalf of the Election
Integrity Project, noting that there are 11 counties in the state with more
registered voters, and alleging that the state may be out of compliance with
Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
The
letter reads, in part:
NVRA
Section 8 requires states to conduct reasonable list maintenance so as to
maintain an accurate record of eligible voters for use in conducting federal
elections.1 As you may know, Congress enacted Section 8 of the NVRA to protect
the integrity of the electoral process. Allowing the names of ineligible voters
to remain on the voting rolls harms the integrity of the electoral process and
undermines voter confidence in the legitimacy of elections.
…
As
the top election official in California, it is your responsibility under
federal law to coordinate California’s statewide effort to conduct a program
that reasonably ensures the lists of eligible voters are accurate.
Judicial
Watch lays out the specifics:
“[T]here were
more total registered voters
than
there were adults over the age of 18
living
in each of the following eleven (11)
counties:
Imperial (102%), Lassen (102%),
Los
Angeles (112%), Monterey (104%), San
Diego
(138%), San Francisco (114%), San
Mateo
(111%), Santa Cruz (109%), Solano
(111%),
Stanislaus (102%), and Yolo (110%).”
The
letter notes that the percentage in L.A.
Country may
be as high as 144%.
The
letter contains a threat to sue the Secretary of State if Padilla does not
remove from the rolls “persons who have become ineligible to vote by
reason of death, change in residence, or a disqualifying criminal conviction,
and to remove noncitizens who have registered to vote unlawfully.”
It
gives Padilla 14 days to respond, and 90 days to correct alleged
violations of the law.
Padilla
has been one of the main voices in opposition to President Donald
Trump’s Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, refusing
to share voter data with it on the argument that doing so would
“legitimize false claims of massive election cheating last fall.”
President
Trump has claimed that he would have won the popular vote in the 2016
presidential election if not for illegal voting, and his administration
has singled
out California as a possible contributor to that margin.
The
Election Integrity Project is a California-based volunteer organization
that monitors voting irregularities.
Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He was
named one of the “most
influential” people in news media in 2016.
He is the co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, is available from Regnery.
Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
August 5, 2017
So addicts must show photo IDs to get
off drugs, but not to vote?
The homeless,
downtrodden, and poor who show up at drug detox centers all must show photo
identification to get treatment. It's done to prevent them from going to
more than one center for whatever maintenance fix they may be receiving at the
first center. It is obvious that the
government knows everyone has the capability to get a photo ID, so why do so
many Democrats block that requirement when it comes to voting? They use the false
arguments of voter intimidation while dismissing the real issue that
maintaining a fair election is extremely important to maintaining our
freedoms.
These are the same
Democrats (and their media allies) who are complaining that Russia supposedly interfered
in our election process. Yet they do everything they can to block
commonsense photo ID requirements that the majority of the public supports to
ensure fair elections. They call people racists who support these laws.
The fact that they fight these photo ID requirements shows they really
don't care about the integrity of the voting process.
The ID requirements at
drug treatment facilities are intended to prevent people from enrolling in
multiple programs and selling opioid medication such as methadone on the black market, said a spokesman from
the federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, adding
that programs would be liable for misuse of the medications.
Some detox centers will
admit a person without ID first and make time later to sort out the person's
identity, but doing so comes at risk of running afoul of federal and state
regulations on dispensing medications, experts said.
The government requires
the poor and elderly to have a photo ID to get food stamps, to open a bank
account, to get welfare, to get Medicaid, and to get Social Security among many
other things. Yet..
Democrats will go to
court to stop a state requiring people to get a photo ID to vote, using the
argument that it is racist. The fact that they require photo IDs for so
many other things the poor and minorities have to do shows what a crock that
argument is.
The only reason to block the photo ID laws for voting is to
open up voting to fraud.
Who will influence
the 2018 elections more: Russia or Mexico?
By Ed Straker
Exactly how many votes is Russia
alleged to have cast in the 2016 elections? I believe that the
number is zero.
Exactly how many votes have citizens
of Mexico and Central America cast in the 2016 elections? We don't
know the exact number, but we know that it is much
more than zero.
A 2014
study in the online Electoral Studies Journal shows that in the
2008 and 2010 elections, illegal immigrant [sic; should be
"aliens" –ed.] votes were in fact quite high.
"We find that some noncitizens
participate in U.S. elections, and that this participation has been large
enough to change meaningful election outcomes including Electoral College
votes, and congressional elections," wrote Jesse T. Richman [and] Gulshan
A. Chattha, both of Old Dominion University, and David C. Earnest of George
Mason University.
More specifically, they write,
"Noncitizen votes likely gave Senate Democrats the pivotal 60th vote
needed to overcome filibusters in order to pass health care reform and other
Obama administration priorities in the 111th Congress."
Specifically, the authors say that illegals may have cast as many as 2.8
million votes in 2008 and 2010. That's a lot of votes. And when you
consider [that] the population of illegal inhabitants has only grown since
then, it's not unreasonable to suppose that their vote has, too.
So why is Russia getting all the
attention? Russia, at worst, operated a small-scale propaganda
campaign on places like Twitter and Facebook before the election. The
amount of propaganda it disseminated was far, far less than 1% of the liberal
propaganda put out daily by The New York Times, The Washington Post, ABC, NBC,
CBS, CNN, and many others who said Trump is a racist, Trump hates women, Trump
hates poor people, etc. So Russian "interference" was
basically negligible.
Yet you wouldn't know that from
reading the headlines.
Russia is using fake accounts on
social media – many of them bots – to spread disinformation, the officials
said. European elections are being targeted, too, and the attacks
were not likely to end this year, they warned.
"We expect Russia to continue
using propaganda, social media, false-flag personas, sympathetic
spokespeople[,] and other means of influence to try to exacerbate social and
political fissures in the United States," Dan Coats, the director of
national intelligence, told the Senate Intelligence Committee at its annual
hearing on worldwide threats.
Oh, no – bots are spreading
disinformation! Let me know when these bots produce 1% of the
disinformation produced by The New York Times on a daily basis.
Trump initially tried
to investigate real interference in our elections. He set up a
commission to investigate voter fraud chaired by Kansas secretary of state Kris
Kobach. But when the liberal media cried that the commission was all
about voter suppression, Trump
folded like a cheap umbrella. He shut down the commission before
it could complete its research into what is probably massive voter fraud on the
part of Mexican and other foreign nationals.
And so Republicans have accepted
Democratic talking points. They talk only about Russian
"interference" and are so cowed that they won't talk about illegal
aliens voting. That's why we hear only about Russia, Russia, Russia,
because like so many political topics – amnesty for illegal aliens, attempting
to redefine marriage, boys in girls' bathrooms – Republicans are afraid to
speak out.
Judicial
Watch Sues California and Los Angeles Over Dirty Voter Registration Rolls
https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-sues-california-los-angeles-dirty-vote
DECEMBER 13, 2017
‘Eleven of California’s 58
counties have registration rates exceeding 100% of the age-eligible
citizenry.’
‘California has the highest rate of inactive registrations of any
state in the country. Los Angeles County has the highest number of inactive
registrations of any single county in the country’
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a
federal lawsuit against Los Angeles County and the State of California over
their failure to clean their voter rolls and to produce election-related
records as required by the federal National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) (Judicial
Watch, Inc.et al. v. Dean C. Logan, et al. (No.
2:17-cv-08948)). The lawsuit was filed in the United States District
Court for the Central District of California’s Western Division on behalf of
Judicial Watch, Election Integrity Project California, Inc., and Wolfgang
Kupka, Rhue Guyant, Jerry Griffin, and Delores M. Mars, who are lawfully
registered voters in Los Angeles County.
Judicial Watch argues that the State of California and a
number of its counties, including the county of Los Angeles, have registration
rates exceeding 100%:
Eleven of California’s 58 counties have registration rates
exceeding 100% of the age-eligible citizenry.
Los Angeles County has more voter registrations on its voter
rolls than it has citizens who are old enough to register. Specifically,
according to data provided to and published by the EAC, Los Angeles County has
a registration rate of 112% of its adult citizen population.
The entire State of California has a registration rate of
about 101% of its age-eligible citizenry.
Judicial Watch points out that this is due in part to the
high numbers of inactive registrations that are still carried on California’s
voter rolls:
About 21% of all of California’s voter registrations, or more
than one in five, are designated as inactive.
California has the highest rate of inactive registrations of
any state in the country…. Los Angeles County has the highest number of
inactive registrations of any single county in the country.
Although these inactive registrations should be removed after
a statutory waiting period consisting of two general federal elections, California
officials are simply refusing to do so.
Judicial Watch explains that, even though a registration is
officially designated as “inactive,” it may still be voted on election day and
is still on the official voter registration list. The inactive registrations of
voters who have moved to a different state “are particularly vulnerable to
fraudulent abuse by a third party” because the voter who has moved “is unlikely
to monitor the use of or communications concerning an old registration.”
Inactive registrations “are also inherently vulnerable to abuse by voters who
plan to fraudulently double-vote in two different jurisdictions on the same
election day.”
Judicial Watch sent a written request for public records on
November 16, 2017, and another on November 29, 2017, seeking information about
“the number of inactive registrations on the voter rolls in Los Angeles
County,” but was told each time that there were no responsive records.
Last summer, Judicial Watch sent a broader request for voter
roll records that Los Angeles County and the State of California are required
by the NVRA to keep and to make publicly available. Nothing was produced in
response to this request. Judicial Watch points out that it is impossible to
believe that there were no responsive records:
Los Angeles County, with over five million active voters and
massive list maintenance responsibilities, and the Secretary of State of
California [must] have exchanged emails responsive to [Judicial Watch’s]
request for “all email or other communications between the Secretary’s Office
and all California County voter registration officials concerning . . .
[i]nstructions to the counties concerning their general list maintenance
practices and obligations” and “[n]otices to the counties concerning any failure
to comply with their voter list maintenance obligations.” Such emails
should have been produced.
Section 8(a)(4) of the NVRA requires
states to implement a program to remove ineligible registrants; and to turn
over relevant records and information. Judicial Watch argues:
Los Angeles County is failing to properly conduct the list
maintenance required by the NVRA by failing to properly train employees,
failing to require and enter registrants’ birthdates, and failing to timely
process reports that registrants have died, have committed disqualifying
felonies, are mentally incompetent, or have registered twice.
Judicial Watch asks that the court enjoin Los Angeles County
and the state of California from further violating the NRVA, and compel them to
“develop and implement a general program that makes a reasonable effort to
remove from Los Angeles County’s rolls the registrations of ineligible
registrants.” Judicial Watch asks to inspect and copy the requested voter roll
records.
Judicial Watch sent a notice-of-violation
letter in August 2017 to threatening to sue
California and certain of its counties over their violations of the NVRA.
California was one of 12
states to receive such letters from Judicial Watch.
“California may have the dirtiest election rolls in the
country,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Federal law requires
states to take reasonable steps to clean up their voting rolls. Dirty voting
rolls can mean dirty elections. This lawsuit aims to ensure that citizens of
California can have more confidence that their elections are fair and honest.”
Judicial Watch Senior Attorney and Director of its Election Integrity
Project Robert Popper recently provided
testimony to the Presidential Advisory Commission on
Election Integrity concerning the NVRA. Popper was formerly Deputy Chief of the
Voting Section of the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department.
Judicial Watch sent notice-of-violation letters threatening
to sue 11
other states having counties in which the number of
registered voters exceeds the number of voting-age citizens, as calculated by
the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2011-2015 American Community Survey: Alabama, Florida,
Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North
Carolina and Tennessee. Judicial Watch informed the states that should they
fail to take action to correct violations of Section 8 of the NVRA, it would
file suit.
Judicial Watch previously filed successful lawsuits under the
NVRA against Ohio and Indiana that
resulted in those states taking several actions to clean up their voting rolls.
Judicial Watch is currently suing Kentucky over
its failure to remove ineligible voters as required by the NVRA, and is suing
the State of Maryland and Montgomery
County over their failure to release voting-related
records.
Judicial Watch is being assisted by Charles H. Bell Jr., of
Bell, McAndrews & Hiltachk, LLP; and H. Christopher Coates of Law Office of
H. Christopher Coates.
JOHN BINDER
CALIFORNIA MOVES CLOSER TO FINAL SURRENDER TO
LA RAZA SUPREMACY
DE FACTO CITIZENSHIP PER LA RAZA:
NO TEST, NO BACKGROUND CHECKS
ON CRIMINALITY, NO BACK TAXES, NO
FINES.... JUST JUMP STRAIGHT TO VOTING BOOTHS!
AND VOTE OFTEN!!!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2017/07/john-binder-californias-surrender-to.html
In 2013, California lawmakers passed legislation
that allowed illegal aliens to obtain driver’s licenses if they can prove to
the Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) their identity and state residency. The
plan was one of the largest victories to date by the open borders lobby.… JOHN BINDER –
BREITBART.com
The biggest losers in Mexico's election? The Democrats
Every election has winners and losers, and Mexico's is no
exception. While the press is making much of Mexico's centrist PRI
and center-right PAN parties being the big losers in last night's election of
socialist Andrés Manuel López-Obrador in Mexico, the real loser is actually up
north, in the U.S. Democratic Party.
Sounds strange until you look at the details.
After all the ideological compatibility between AMLO's new lefty
MORENA party and the increasingly socialist U.S. Democrats seems to be
identical.
Both favor heavy social spending, forced unionization of workers,
political patronage, Chicago-style political muscle, and fealty to the ideals
of the Socialist International. It's what most socialists do until
they run out of Other People's Money.
Democrats have staked their future on uneducated, needy illegals
forming the base of their party's fortunes. In Mexico, AMLO has done
the same thing. The problem comes because the Mexicans in question
are the same people.
AMLO's social spending policies are likely to draw Mexicans
illegally here in the U.S. back to Mexico. If you have a choice of
taking welfare benefits here or welfare benefits there, it's likely you'll go
for them in your home country, where the language is the same, the Migra isn't
out looking for you, and you know your way around the culture. That's bad news for the Democrats, who rely on illegals to lard
up their electoral college votes in blue states, increase federal spending
based on head counts here, and actually vote illegally in elections,
particularly in districts where very few people are in the country legally.
It goes to show that even with ideological conformity, nations
have interests, and interests most certainly can conflict.
For many years, I had wondered why what passes
for Mexico's conservatives always seemed to be so
fiercely aligned to U.S. Democrats. Why was
former Mexican president Vicente Fox, Mexico's
first elected conservative via the PAN party,
always such a shill for Democrats? Why was
President Felipe Calderón, who came after him,
almost as obnoxious? Why did these people so
advocate for an end to U.S. borders and denounce
the American people as Nazis for opposing them,
despite their being fairly conservative and
ideologically recognizable on every other issue?
It turns out their political fortunes were built on getting as
many indigent Mexicans out of the country as possible. Their
governments benefited from their absence, both from remittances and in the way
they lowered social costs for the Mexican government in terms of housing them,
educating them, and providing them with income and health care among other
things. For a conservative government focused on fiscal discipline,
it was most certainly in their interest to drive as many of Mexico's poor to El
Norte, the better to get the gringo to pay, an old Mexican custom dating from
the war of 1848.
Democrats in the U.S., in turn, lapped up the new migrants, with
California's Democratic gov. Jerry Brown announcing "you're all welcome
here." His party benefited, and the more, the
better. The Catholic bishops also benefited, hence Steve Bannon's
admittedly harsh analysis that the Church was all in for illegals even as it
claimed to believe in the rule of law, because of its interest in "filling
the pews."
Now comes AMLO, whose big plan is to enact social welfare programs
in Mexico, a move that is sure to draw many Mexicans back to their home
country. It makes sense from his point of view and the viewpoint of
his national interest, given that Mexico can no longer afford to lose
people. Demographically, the median age is rising there, the
population growth has gone flat, and incomes have passed the $7,000-a-year
threshold, below which is said to trigger illegal immigration.
Nations always have interests, and this one conflicts with the
U.S. Democratic Party's interest, which, up until now, aligned with the
interests of Mexico's conservatives.
AMLO, if you look carefully at his words, seems cognizant of
Democrats recognizing this and maybe getting angry about it, thus he has
offered up to his ideological coevals in the States the "human right"
of illegal immigration to the U.S. as a sop, using other people's countries
instead of his own. Here are his words:
Mexican presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO)
declared mass immigration to the United States a "human right" for
all North Americans during a speech Tuesday.
"And soon, very soon – after the victory of our movement – we
will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in
the world," Obrador said, adding that immigrants "must leave their
towns and find a life in the United States."
What we are looking at here is a bid to ship illegals from other
countries through Mexico to the U.S. (to keep Democrats happy), while
implicitly discouraging Mexican illegal immigration, which has drained the
country of talent. There is no other explanation for such a
policy. Turning Mexico into a road stop for illegals from Central
America and elsewhere by calling it a "human right" is frankly toxic
for Mexico, because it will empower cartels and give Mexico's government
nothing, not even remittances, and plenty of enmity with the
U.S. What's more, it should serve as an electoral mobilizer for
Republicans, who will be angry at the move.
Net effect: another loss for Democrats, in terms of lost people it
intended to build its party fortunes on and in energizing
Republicans. They're not going to like this.
FIFTEEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT LA RAZA
“THE RACE”
by Michelle Malkin
Only in America could critics of a group called
"The Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing
identity chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have
succeeded in redefining all opposition as "hate."
Both Barack Obama and John McCain will speak this
week in San Diego at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza,
the Latino organization whose name is Spanish for, yes, "The Race."
Can you imagine Obama and McCain paying homage to a group of white people who
called themselves that? No matter. The presidential candidates and the media have
legitimized "The Race" as a mainstream ethnic lobbying group and
marginalized its critics as intolerant bigots. The unvarnished truth is that
the group is a radical ethnic nationalist outfit that abuses your tax dollars
and milks PC politics to undermine our sovereignty.
Here
are 15 things you should know about "The Race":
15. "The Race" supports driver's licenses
for illegal aliens.
14."The Race" demands in-state tuition
discounts for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding U.S.
citizens and law-abiding legal immigrants.
13. "The Race" vehemently opposes
cooperative immigration enforcement efforts between local, state and federal
authorities.
12. "The Race" opposes a secure fence on
the southern border.
11. "The Race" joined the American-Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee in a failed lawsuit attempt to prevent the feds
from entering immigration information into a key national crime database -- and
to prevent local police officers from accessing the data.
10. "The Race" opposed the state of
Oklahoma's tough immigration-enforcement-first laws, which cut off welfare to
illegal aliens, put teeth in employer sanctions and strengthened local-federal
cooperation and information sharing.
9. "The Race" joined other open-borders,
anti-assimilationists and sued to prevent Proposition 227, California's
bilingual education reform ballot initiative, from becoming law.
8. "The Race" bitterly protested
common-sense voter ID provisions as an "absolute disgrace."
7. "The Race" has consistently opposed
post-9/11 national security measures at every turn.
6. Former "Race" president Raul
Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton's Hispanic outreach adviser, said this: "U.S.
English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks." He was referring
to U.S. English, the nation's oldest, largest citizens' action group dedicated
to preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United States.
"The Race" also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and advised
the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while avoiding
the terms "illegal" and "amnesty."
5. "The Race" gives mainstream cover to a
poisonous subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil
Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA). The late GOP
Rep. Charlie Norwood rightly characterized the organization as "a radical
racist group … one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has
permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a
racist nation out of the American West."
4. "The Race" is currently leading a
smear campaign against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called
for TV and cable news networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off
the airwaves -- in addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut
up their foes. The New York Times reported that current "Race"
president Janet Murguia believes "hate speech" should "not be
tolerated, even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment
rights."
3. "The Race" sponsors militant ethnic
nationalist charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars (at least $8
million in federal education grants). The schools include Aztlan Academy in
Tucson, Ariz., the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, Ariz., Academia Cesar Chavez
Charter School in St. Paul, Minn., and La Academia Semillas del Pueblo in Los
Angeles, whose principal inveighed: "We don't want to drink from a White
water fountain, we have our own wells and our natural reservoirs and our way of
collecting rain in our aqueducts. We don't need a White water fountain …
ultimately the White way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of
life will eventually lead to our own destruction."
2. "The Race" has perfected the art of
the PC shakedown at taxpayer expense, pushing relentlessly to lower home loan
standards for Hispanic borrowers, reaping millions in federal "mortgage
counseling" grants, seeking special multimillion-dollar earmarks and
partnering with banks that do business with illegal aliens.
1. "The Race" thrives on ethnic supremacy
-- and the elite sheeple's unwillingness to call it what it is. As historian
Victor Davis Hanson observes: "[The] organization's very nomenclature 'The
National Council of La Raza' is hate speech to the core. Despite all the
contortions of the group, Raza (as its Latin cognate suggests) reflects the
meaning of 'race' in Spanish, not 'the people' -- and that's precisely why we
don't hear of something like 'The National Council of the People,' which would
not confer the buzz notion of ethnic, racial and tribal chauvinism."
The
fringe is the center. The center is the fringe. Viva La Raza.
*
ALIEN
NATION: Secrets of the Invasion
May
2006 – ALIEN NATION: Secrets of the Invasion – Why America's government invites
rampant illegal immigration
It's
widely regarded as America's biggest problem: Between 12 and 20 million aliens
(MOST SOURCES SUGGEST THERE ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY NEARLY 40 MILLION ILLEGALS
HERE NOW) – including large numbers of criminals, gang members and even
terrorists – have entered this nation illegally, with countless more streaming
across our scandalously unguarded borders daily.
The
issue polarizes the nation, robs citizens of jobs, bleeds taxpayers, threatens
America's national security and dangerously balkanizes the country into
unassimilated ethnic groups with little loyalty or love for America's founding
values. Indeed, the de facto invasion is rapidly transforming America into a
totally different country than the one past generations have known and loved.
And
yet – most Americans have almost no idea what is really going on, or why it is
happening.
While
news reports depict demonstrations and debates, and while politicians promise
"comprehensive border security programs," no real answers ever seem
to emerge.
But
there are answers. Truthful answers. Shocking answers.
In
its groundbreaking May edition, WND's acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine
reveals the astounding hidden agendas, plans and people behind America's
immigration nightmare.
Titled
"ALIEN NATION," the issue is subtitled "SECRETS OF THE INVASION:
Why government invites rampant illegal immigration." Indeed, it reveals
pivotal secrets very few Americans know. For example:
Did
you know that the powerfully influential Council on Foreign Relations – often
described as a “shadow government" – issued a comprehensive report last
year laying out a five-year plan for the "establishment by 2010 of a North
American economic and security community" with a common "outer
security perimeter"?
Roughly
translated: In the next few years, according to the 59-page report titled
"Building a North American Community," the U.S. must be integrated
with the socialism, corruption, poverty and population of Mexico and Canada.
"Common perimeter" means wide-open U.S. borders between the U.S.,
Mexico and Canada. As Phyllis Schlafly reveals in this issue of Whistleblower:
"This CFR document asserts that President Bush, Mexican President Vicente
Fox and Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin 'committed their governments' to
this goal when they met at Bush's ranch and at Waco, Texas, on March 23, 2005.
The three adopted the 'Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America'
and assigned 'working groups' to fill in the details. It was at this same
meeting, grandly called the North American Summit, that President Bush pinned
the epithet 'vigilantes' on the volunteers guarding our border in
Arizona."
The
CFR report – important excerpts of which are published in Whistleblower – also
suggests North American elitists begin getting together regularly, and
presumably secretly, "to buttress North American relationships, along the
lines of the Bilderberg or Wehrkunde conferences, organized to support
transatlantic relations." The Bilderberg and Wehrkunde conferences are
highly secret conclaves of the powerful. For decades, there have been
suspicions that such meetings were used for plotting the course of world events
and especially the centralization of global decision-making.
Did
you know that radical immigrant groups – including the League of United Latin
American Citizens (LULAC), the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational
Fund (MALDEF), the Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan (MEChA) and the
National Council of La Raza (La Raza) – not only share a revolutionary agenda
of conquering America's southwest, but they also share common funding sources,
notably the Ford and Rockefeller foundations?
''California
is going to be a Hispanic state," said Mario Obeldo, former head of
MALDEF. "Anyone who does not like it should leave." And MEChA's goal
is even more radical: an independent ''Aztlan,'' the collective name this
organization gives to the seven states of the U.S. Southwest – Arizona,
California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas and Utah. So why would the
Rockefeller and Ford foundations support such groups? Joseph Farah tells the
story in this issue of Whistleblower.
Why
have America's politicians – of both major parties – allowed the illegal alien
invasion of this nation to continue for the last 30 years unabated? With
al-Qaida and allied terrorists promising to annihilate major U.S. cities with
nuclear weapons, with some big-city hospital emergency rooms near closure due
to the crush of so many illegals, with the rapid spread throughout the U.S. of
MS-13, the super-violent illegal alien gang – with all this and more, why do
U.S. officials choose to ignore the laws of the land and the will of the people
to pursue, instead, policies of open borders and lax immigration enforcement?
The
answers to all this and much more are in Whistleblower's "ALIEN
NATION" issue.
Is
there hope? Or is America lost to a demographic invasion destined to annihilate
its traditional Judeo-Christian culture, and to the ever-growing likelihood
that nuclear-armed jihadists will cross our porous borders and wreak
unthinkable destruction here?
There
most definitely is hope, according to this issue of Whistleblower. Although
most politicians of both major political parties have long since abdicated
their responsibility for securing America's borders and dealing effectively
with the millions already here illegally, there are a few exceptions – most
notably Colorado Rep. Tom Tancredo.
May's
Whistleblower includes an exclusive sneak preview of Tancredo's forthcoming
blockbuster book, "In Mortal Danger: The Battle for America’s Border and
Security." In an extended excerpt, Whistleblower presents Tencredo's
expert and inspired analysis of exactly how to solve the nation's most vexing
problem.
Pelosi Explains Her Shutdown Strategy: ‘Start with Feather Then You Move to Sledgehammer’
2:50
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) celebrated the end of the partial government shutdown on Friday by sitting down with leftist media commentators and bragging about manipulating President Donald Trump into agreeing on a temporary reopening to allow negotiations over a border wall to take place.
The Daily Beast praised Pelosi — including referring to a CNN story that referred to her as “Queen Pelosi” — in its reporting for refusing to allow him to deliver the State of the Union speech on the House floor and saying, “no” repeatedly to his request for $5.7 billion in funding for the wall, saying:
Not many politicians have gone up against Trump and emerged victorious, with their dignity intact. How did she do it? “First you start with a feather,” she said, “then you move to a sledgehammer.” In her telling, when she first told the president he couldn’t give his SOTU while the government was closed, he said he was coming. She rebuffed him a second time, and he said he was coming anyway. Then she said, “please don’t,” telling him the House that she controls would not vote on a “concurrent resolution” to formally invite him.Bingo! “One step at a time and he understood, and when he understood, he understood, and sometimes it’s about timing,” she said. Asked if she thought Trump and his people realized her power over something as traditional as the SOTU, she said, rather dismissively, “I don’t spend a lot of time sussing out what they know.”
Breitbart TV
Pelosi was also dismissive of what Trump thinks of her, according to the Daily Beast, when she was asked about being with the president when the cameras aren’t rolling.
“He’s courteous, he’s respectful in his own way—and like other men he sometimes doesn’t know his condescension,” Pelosi said.
Pelosi, according to the Daily Beast article, said she refuses to psychoanalyze Trump but “I do know that he needs prayers.”
Pelosi also boasted that Trump has most likely learned his lesson and won’t shut down the government again, even though the president has said he has not caved on his pledge to build a wall but is taking Democrats at their word that if the government reopened they would negotiate with him.
Trump has vowed if an agreement on border security cannot be reached by February 15 — the end of the temporary Continuing Resolution to fully fund the government — he would shut down the government again or invoke national emergency authority to use money other than what Congress appropriates for a wall to get it paid for and built.
“No question for those who are keeping score that the longest standoff on government funding in history ended as a clear win for Pelosi and her ‘for the people’ agenda,” the Daily Beast reported.
The “reporter” concludes the piece by saying Pelosi deserved the title “most powerful woman.”
“That, of course, is the title she now holds, and that Trump must reckon with as he heads into the rocky shoals ahead,” the article said.
Follow Penny Starr on Twitter
No comments:
Post a Comment