Barbra Streisand: Watching Hillary Clinton ‘Makes You Want to Cry for What We Could Have Had’
1:33
Left-wing actress-singer Barbra Streisand declared Sunday that watching Hillary Clinton today makes her want to cry because it reminds her of what America is missing out on if the failed Democratic nominee would’ve won the presidency.
“When you hear Hillary Clinton on Fareed Zakaria’s show, it makes you want to cry for what we could have had,” Barbra Streisand said in a social media post. “Someone so intelligent, so articulate and so compassionate. The epitomy (sic) of Presidential!”
Streisand, by her own admission, cried when Clinton lost in 2016, and said last year that she still feels “numb” about her election loss.
“So, I was in tears,” she said in October.”We walked around of kind of numb. I’m still a little bit numb because I can’t believe it happened, since, you know, Hillary got 2.9 million more votes than Trump and she’s not the president, so I don’t know.”
The 76-year-old’s latest album, titled Walls, also features several references to her crying, with lyrics like, “Why can’t you feel the tears I cry today? Cried today, cried today” and “Can’t you see I’m crying? Can’t you see we’re crying?”
Last year, the “Woman in Love” singer also suggested that women who voted for Donald Trump did so because their husbands did.
“A lot of women vote the way their husbands vote; they don’t believe enough in their own thoughts,” she said.
VIDEO:
THE
FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY
FROM THE FIRST DAY!
Is it a signal
that she's back in the game because she's selling her president-ability to the
world's global billionaire crowd and laying the groundwork for more
funds? There are all kinds of ways for foreign billionaires to get
money to the U.S. without consequences, after all. What's more, it's
pretty much the biggest base of support she has, which is at least one reason
why she lost the 2016 election.
*
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public
service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
*
The basic components
of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500
audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the ostensibly
philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
*
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to
every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
THE
SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
The left cared nothing about that bit of
collusion.
Hillary and her campaign aides have long been involved
with Russia for reasons of personal gain. Clinton herself got $145 million in
donations to the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty
percent of all uranium production in the U.S. Her campaign chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the
financial benefits of being on the board of a Russian company, Joule, which he did not disclose. PATRICIA McCARTHY
Had Hillary been elected, the Clinton
Foundation would be raking in even more millions than it did before. She
would be happily selling access, favors and our remaining freedoms out from
under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY
No comments:
Post a Comment