Sunday, April 28, 2019

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND ANTI-AMERICAN CHRISTIAN HATING MUSLIMS

Why Are Democrats So Petrified of Islam?



The votes?  To paraphrase the late, great George Carlin: The fascism of political correctness?  No, it's pure, unadulterated fear, with heavy doses of anti-white and Christophobia mixed in.
Perhaps the moniker "radical Islam" should be supplanted with "Islamic supremacism," to keep in line with the Democrats' favorite terrorist group: white supremacists.  In the wake of the Sri Lankan Easter Sunday Islamic supremacist terrorist attacks that killed over 300 "Easter worshipers," Democrats were quick to condemn but refused to acknowledge the ideology of the terrorists or the religious beliefs of the victims.
When a shooting occurs, in the U.S., New Zealand, or wherever, Democrats never show restraint in politicizing the event.  Islamic supremacist terrorism, though?  Well, thoughts and prayers, of course.
The intent in Sri Lanka was to kill and injure Christians.  Islamic supremacists are particularly frightening because they murder indiscriminately; Muslims are the most victimized group, worldwide, of Islamic supremacy.  If Democrats cared about Muslims, wouldn't it make sense that they'd condemn Islamic supremacy?  Yes, but only if the Democrats didn't fear Islam.
We need Democrats to clarify when the religion or race invoked to justify terrorism is warranted.  Had the Sri Lankan Islamic supremacists used AR-15s, Democrats would have called it a "mass shooting," rather than "hatred and violence."
Had the 9/11 Islamic supremacists used "assault weapons," Democrats wouldn't have labeled it "some people did something" and would have rewritten Islamic supremacy out of their life stories — same as they did with the Pulse nightclub terrorist, Omar Mateen.
Right, U.S. rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.)?  Right, Hillary, who, in 2016, said the U.S. was at war against "radical jihadists" as opposed to, um, regular jihadists?  What does "radical jihadists" even mean?  Clinton didn't believe the bull dung she was peddling; she knew that Islamic supremacists have racked up a higher body count than all other groups combined over the span of centuries — and it's not even close.  Most Muslims are not terrorists, but most terrorists are Islamic supremacists.
"Islamophobia" is a 25-year-old bogeyman term concocted by some organization called the International Institute of Islamic Thought.  The noun means nothing, and that's precisely the point: in Democrat World, where political gravity is suspended, useful idiot dupe dopes need a steady diet of useful idiocy to keep them fat, happy, and hateful.
Turns out it's the Democrats in need of an Islamophobia elixir.  It's been astounding to observe how the same Democrats who prattle on about Islamophobia are scared to death of criticizing Muslims.
Surprisingly, the New York Times had a pretty thorough report about National Thowheeth Jama'ath, an India-based Islamic supremacist group believed to be responsible for the Sri Lankan church and hotel bombings.  It's likely the group is internationally funded and may have a connection to the Islamic State.
This detail in the report stood out: "The group ... had a reputation for vandalizing Buddhist statues but little history of carrying out terrorist
I hope President Trump will continue to stay on offense against all terrorism, but that he be cautious in declaring "victory" against Islamic supremacism.  When one terrorist group is defeated, others are always waiting in the wings.  Democrats know this but say nothing because they're afraid.
Islamic Supremacy Apologists
During Omar's 9/11 speech, she slandered and libeled Trump, accusing him of intentionally inciting violence against Muslims.
Was there any admonishment from House Speaker Nurse Ratched Nancy?  Nope; in fact, she admitted that she defended Omar's statement despite not knowingwhat Omar had said.  This is peculiar, given Pelosi's lukewarm acceptance of the MoveOn.org Three Stoogesses: Omar, U.S. rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Minn.), and U.S. rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.).  Tlaib, also Muslim, recentlyaccused not the GOP, but her Democratic Party of Islamophobia.
Pray, tell: what is the explanation for Nancy Pelosi's rush to defend Omar and remain silent on Tlaib?  Is Nancy concerned that the Democratic Party will lose Muslim votes?  According to Pew, though the American Muslim population is about 1 percent of the total U.S. population, it has been steadily increasing since 2007.  Few of the 2 million adult Muslims are Republicans.
They're located in crucial Democrat states and locales, such as New Jersey; Michigan; and Washington, D.C.
Politics is sales; why alienate a growing voting base?  Still, I'm unconvinced that such a small voting demographic has instilled so much fear in the hearts of Democrat politicians — although U.S. senator Bread Line Bernard Sanders (I-Vt.) wants convicted, imprisoned Islamic supremacists to have the right to vote.  If this doesn't tell you how irreparably hopeless the Democrats' voting base is, nothing does.
Useful Idiots All Around
Don't forget, being a Democrat Muslim has extra credit benefits of espousing anti-Semitism with impunity.  Predictably, the DMIC (Democrat Media Industrial Complex), as well as Tessio Republican Joe Scarborough, came to the defense of Omar — not just for minimizing the deaths of nearly 3,000 on 9/11, but for her anti-Semitic social media posts implying the money-hungriness of Jews.  The Democrats and DMIC are probably praying five times daily toward the Kaaba, in Mecca, that Omar doesn't get drunk and tweets that Jews run the world.
Democrat Islamic supremacy apologists refused to say that Christians were the target in Sri Lanka.  Why is it so difficult for Democrats to say an attack on one Christian is an attack on all Christians?  Democrats demand we say that about attacks against Muslims, but in Democrat World, all religions are created equal — but some are created more equal than others.
And just to be clear: Any attack on innocent civilians, irrespective of religions or non-religious beliefs, is abhorrent.
Unfortunately, there are useful idiots on our side, who ascribe to the very left-wing (not right-wing) false ideology gods of Aryan and white supremacy.  Trump voters do not willingly and knowingly associate with these clowns.  On the surface, it may appear bizarre that Democrats seek out the favors of anti-Semitic Muslims, such as Omar and Louis Farrakhan, until one remembers that hatred of those who differ with your political opinions is necessary to the Democrats' sales pitch.
It's been over a month since Democrat Ku Klux Klansman David Duke proclaimed Omar the "most important member" of Congress.  Where's the presser by congressional Democrats demanding that Omar disavow Duke?  Why hasn't Omar herself disavowed Duke?
Recall when CNN's Jake Tapper, in early 2016, demanded to know if Donald Trump disavowed Duke's support.  Why did Tapper give relevance to an irrelevant racist when it applied to Trump but gives no relevance to Duke when it applies to Omar?  Tapper must be petrified to hold Omar to account.
If criticizing Israel and Jews isn't anti-Semitic, according to Democrat logic, then criticizing Islam and lawmakers who practice Islam isn't Islamophobia.  In the Democrat death cult, all criticism is created equal, but some is created more equal than others — a tyranny familiar to all those oppressed in Islamic supremacist nations across the Middle East.
Rich Logis is host of The Rich Logis Show, at TheRichLogisShow.com, and author of the upcoming book 10 Warning Signs Your Child Is Becoming a Democrat.  He can be found on Twitter at @RichLogis.
Image: Tony Webster via Flickr.



ISLAMIST BARACK OBAMA

*
“Of course, one of the main reasons the nation is now “divided, resentful and angry” is because race-baiting, Islamist, class warrior Barack Hussein Obama was president for eight long years." MATTHEW VADUM
*
"But the Obamas are the center of the most delusional cult of personality that the media has yet spawned. And so we get bizarre pieces like these." MONICA SHOWALTER
*
"Along with Obama, Pelosi and Schumer are responsible for incalculable damage done to this country over the eight years of that administration." PATRICIA McCARTHY

THE (REALITY) OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY:
Anti-Semitic, open borders for cheaper labor and funded by criminal banksters… and these pols are making vast fortunes sucking the blood of America!


We must not let them cheat their way to power over the rest of us.  Their ongoing vote fraud must be stopped and the Democrats need to take a look at themselves and at what they have become. It's not a pretty picture.  What they have become threatens to destroy the greatest nation on the planet and they are doing it on purpose.  They have nothing but contempt for the US as founded and for those of us who love this country. PATRICIA McCARTHY – AMERICAN THINKER

“Then we suffered the rattling election of Barack Obama, whose active membership in a white-, Jewish-, and America-hating church was well known to the electorate.  His close personal relationship with the likes of his adored Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan was no secret.  Obama was open about his goals.  He told us he was out to "fundamentally transform America" and the world.”  ALAN BERGSTEIN

“There is a deep racist and anti-Semitic disease in the leadership of the Democrats. As Senator Cory Booker brings his hatred for the Jewish State to the Senate, he should be asked whether he agrees with his hero, “The only good Zionist is a dead Zionist we must take a lesson from Hitler”. DANIEL GREENFIELD



The United States at the Point of No Return

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/02/the_united_states_at_the_point_of_no_return.html#.VsOT8DBA5Nc.blogger

 

There is an unquestioned disconnect between the vast majority of the American people and the so-called elites or ruling class.  Whenever I am in the company of those that are members of this exclusive fraternity, and when the conversation inevitably turns to the subject of the irascible mood of the electorate, I offer what I consider to be a valid theory as to one of the primary reasons why.  That is: a plurality of the populace, myself included, firmly believe the United States is approaching the point of no return to its founding as a nation of individual freedom and opportunity, and that the 2016 election is the most significant in 150 years insofar as determining the long term fate of the country.
More often than not these acquaintances react as if Chicken Little had just escaped the asylum and was running amok claiming the sky is falling.   However, in an effort to be kind to the loon in their midst, I have been told, as a figurative pat on the head, because of my personal background as displaced war orphan from World War II that I am hypersensitive and what is going on in America really isn’t as bad as I claim.
Not as bad as I claim? 
Not since the presidential election of 1932 has the American electorate been so mired in discontent.  Despite the best efforts of the media to portray this discontentment as limited to the Republican base, a variety of polls have confirmed a vast majority of the populace shares this same sense of disgruntlement.  Innumerable polls taken over the past seven years are consistent in showing nearly 7 in 10 Americans believing the nation is headed in the wrong direction. 
Further, nearly 60% think that the next generation will be worse off than they are. And few have any faith that the economic outlook for the country will improve in the near or distant future.
Beginning in the late 1980’s, the cognoscenti declared that expansive government spending, globalization and free trade, combined with a comprehensive and overarching regulatory regime determined to root out so-called corruption and inequality as well as save the planet from the over blown evils of global warming, would be the course the nation should pursue.  The result of this foolhardy and myopic scheme:
1.   In 1988 the national debt of the United States stood at $2.6 Trillion, today it is over $19.0 Trillion-- an increase of 635% (and projected to reach $29.0 Trillion by 2026).  On the other hand the debt of all the nations on earth has grown by only 135% since 1988.
2.   Since November of 2008 the working age population has increased by over 18 million. However, the number of those employed has increased just 5.5 million.  Meanwhile those unemployed or no longer in the work force has ballooned by 12.4 million to a staggering total of 102 million or 40.4% of the working age population.
3.   Another factor impacting on the economic health of the American people is immigration.  In 1988 there were 16 million immigrants (including less than a million illegal aliens) living in the United States.  Today that number has skyrocketed to 42.4 million (including an estimated 12 million illegal aliens).  This enormous increase (165%) in the immigrant population has not only put pressure on a stagnant job market but it has also been a major factor in the decline of median income in the country.
4.   The upshot of all the above is that since 1988 the income of the top 5% has risen 39.3% (adjusted for inflation) and the income of the bottom 50% has fallen by 1.9%.
5.   Since 2008 the Obama cabal has added over 18,000 pages to the Code of Federal Regulations. It is estimated that complying with federal regulations costs the economy nearly $2 Trillion per year and is, along with taxes and innumerable mandates, one of the principle reasons for the lack of new business start-ups and loss of jobs to other countries.
One of the primary hallmarks of the United States had been that of a classless society wherein economic factors allowed the citizenry to take advantage of the marketplace in order to move up or down based on their efforts and willingness to work.  However, this scenario is disappearing as the opportunities for upward mobility cease to exist.  In its place a class driven society, similar to all other quasi-socialist nations past and present, is now becoming inevitable as even the Bureau of Labor Statistics admits that the level of Americans working and in the labor force will continue to decrease over the next 8 years.
Another of the primary factors in the decline of the United States is that the nation’s elites, rather than view education as the means for the people to attain success in a competitive world, have recast it into a vehicle for their pet theories and political views.  Whether it is the promulgation of faux self-esteem, the obsession with the so-called evils of capitalism and the nation’s past, and the theoretical joys of socialism among other inane curricula, the education establishment has assured that the American people are rapidly becoming among the least well-educated populations in the world.
In 2013 American 15 year olds ranked 32nd among industrialized countries in math, 20th in reading and 24th in science.  In 1988 this same age group ranked among the top 5-10 nations in the world in these same categories. Further, recent polls have indicated that as a byproduct of the radicalized education establishment, nearly 7 out of 10 between the ages of 18 and 29 would vote for an avowed socialist. Thus it is clear that the future of the country is on very shaky ground.
As for the issue of freedom: in a recent analysis it was determined that the United States now ranks 12th among the nations of the world in economic freedom (6thin 2008) but a dismal 31st in personal freedom (17th in 2008).  The authors of the study commented:
The decline reflects the long-term drop in every category of economic freedom and its rule of law indicators. The US performance is worrisome and shows that the US can no longer claim to be the leading bastion of liberty in the world.  In addition to the expansion of the regulatory state and drop in economic freedom, the war on terror, the war on drugs and the erosion of property rights due to a greater use of eminent domain all likely contributed to the US decline.
Using the cudgel of the mainstream media, the entertainment complex and the education establishment, the Left and its surrogate, the Democratic Party, have successfully inculcated into a plurality of the American people a belief that there are no moral absolutes and that the state can grant any rights that it so chooses to whomever it chooses.  Further, the nation’s founding documents are arcane, racially insensitive, and unsuitable for today.  Thus religious liberty, property rights and freedom of speech are under aggressive assault.  The Judiciary is now almost under the complete control of these same statists, and with the death of Justice Scalia the last line of defense, the Supreme Court, is in peril.
The vast majority of the American people sense that the future of the nation and that of their progeny is in serious jeopardy.  However, one of the most troubling aspects of the current unease and angst among the general public is what this portends: when anger and frustration evolve into deep seated passion, reason is too often a casualty.  As Thomas Sowell recently wrote:
Too many nations, in desperate times, especially after the authorities have discredited themselves and forfeited the trust of the people, have turned to some new and charismatic leader, who ended up turning a dire situation into an utter catastrophe,
This has been true throughout history whether in England in the 1650’s, France in the 1790’s, or Russia, Italy and Germany in the 20th century. 
In the current campaign for the next president, there are candidates attempting to tap into the ire of the citizenry by either promising that a purer form of socialism will magically solve the problems or by claiming that they, by sheer force of their will and personality, will part the seas and save the nation.  Unfortunately, due to the ill-education of the populace as well as their angst, far too many seeds of this demagoguery are falling on fertile ground.  The election of any of these candidates will only exacerbate and make permanent the nations woes.
So to my ruling class friends safely ensconced in Washington, New York and other enclaves among the like-minded and wealthy, this nation is at the point of no return to the country of freedom and opportunity that allowed you to be where you are.  The folks in fly-over country know it and so should you.

BARACK OBAMA’S NOT SO SECRET PRO-MU$LIM, ANTI-SEMITIC MOVE FOR A THIRD TERM FOR LIFE.

"When former president Barack Obama, former president Bill Clinton and Eric Holder, a top DOJ official in both administrations, have been caught hanging around with Farrakhan, there’s a racism problem." DANIEL GREENFIELD


"Then we suffered the rattling election of Barack Obama, whose active membership in a white-, Jewish-, and America-hating church was well known to the electorate.  His close personal relationship with the likes of his adored Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan was no secret.  Obama was open about his goals.  He told us he was out to "fundamentally transform America" and the world." ALAN BERGSTEIN


Attorney General Eric Holder: Tim Geithner can be sure he won't be hounded about his tax-dodging by his colleague Eric Holder, US Attorney General. Judicial Watch strongly opposed Holder because of his terrible ethics record, which includes: obstructing an FBI investigation of the theft of nuclear secrets from Los Alamos Nuclear Laboratory; rejecting multiple requests for an independent counsel to investigate alleged fundraising abuses by then-Vice President Al Gore in the Clinton White House; undermining the criminal investigation of President Clinton by Kenneth Starr in the midst of the Lewinsky investigation; and planning the violent raid to seize then-six-year-old Elian Gonzalez at gunpoint in order to return him to Castro's Cuba.  JUDICIAL WATCH

BARCK HUSSEIN OBAMA’S MUSLIM HERITAGE

Earlier this month, jihadists of the Al-Shabaab terror group hijacked a bus heading to Garissa and ordered all the passengers to exit the vehicle. The assailants asked for identification cards, then proceeded to separate the Muslims from the Christians.

When two Christians refused to recite the Islamic statement of faith, or Shahada, they were executed.

 

 

No comments: