THE KORAN
BIBLE OF THE MUSLIM TERRORIST:
“The Wahhabis finance thousands of madrassahs
throughout the world where young boys are brainwashed into becoming fanatical foot-soldiers
for the petrodollar-flush Saudis and other emirs of the Persian Gulf.” AMIL IMANI
Koran 2:191
"s lay the unbelievers wherever you find them"
Koran 3:21 "Muslims must not take the infidels as friends"
Koran 5:33 "Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam"
Koran 8:12 "Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other
than the Koran"
Koran 8:60 " Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the
infidels"
Koran 8:65 "The unbelievers are stupid, urge all Muslims to fight
them"
Koran 9:5 "When the opportunity arises, k ill the infidels wherever you
find them"
Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood"
Koran 22:19 "Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron
rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies"
Koran 47:4 "Do not hanker for peace with the infidels, behead them when
you catch them".
DID DIRTY MUSLIM SAUDIS MONEY FINANCE THE BUSH, CLINTON AND
OBAMA LIBRARIES?
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/09/amil-imani-myth-of-moderate-muslim-once.html
“The tentacles of the Islamist hydra have deeply
penetrated the world. The Egyptian-based Muslim Brotherhood poses a clear
threat in Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood also wages its deadly campaign through
its dozens of well-established and functioning branches all over the world.”
*
“The
Wahhabis finance thousands of madrassahs throughout the world where young boys
are brainwashed into becoming fanatical foot-soldiers for the petrodollar-flush
Saudis and other emirs of the Persian Gulf.” AMIL IMANI
* We
will take advantage of their immigration policy to infiltrate them.
* We
will use their own welfare system to provide us with food, housing, schooling,
and health care, while we out breed them and plot against them. We will
Caliphate on their dime.
* We
will use political correctness as a weapon. Anyone who criticizes us, we will
take the opportunity to grandstand and curry favor from the media and Democrats
and loudly accuse our critics of being an Islamophobe.
* We
will use their own discrimination laws against them and slowly introduce Sharia
Law into their culture..
Islam's Greatest Victory: The Fall of Constantinople
Koran 3:21 "Muslims must not take the infidels as friends"
Koran 5:33 "Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam"
Koran 8:12 "Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran"
Koran 8:60 " Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels"
Koran 8:65 "The unbelievers are stupid, urge all Muslims to fight them"
Koran 9:5 "When the opportunity arises, k ill the infidels wherever you find them"
Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood"
Koran 22:19 "Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies"
Koran 47:4 "Do not hanker for peace with the infidels, behead them when you catch them".
“The tentacles of the Islamist hydra have deeply penetrated the world. The Egyptian-based Muslim Brotherhood poses a clear threat in Egypt. The Muslim Brotherhood also wages its deadly campaign through its dozens of well-established and functioning branches all over the world.”
Of all of Islam’s conquests of Christian territory, the most symbolically significant occurred today, on May 20, 1453, when Constantinople fell. For not only was “New Rome” a living and direct extension of the ancient Roman Empire and current capital of the Christian Roman Empire (or Byzantium), but its cyclopean walls had prevented Islam from entering Europe through its eastern doorway for the previous seven centuries.
On becoming Ottoman sultan, Mehmet, or Muhammad II (b. 1432, r. 1451-1481) -- “the mortal enemy of the Christians,” to quote a contemporary prelate -- made ready for war. Throughout the spring of 1453 the city watched helplessly as his forces made their way to and surrounded Constantinople by land and sea. One contemporary remarked that Muhammad’s “army seemed as numberless as grains of sand, spread... across the land from shore to shore.” In the end, some one hundred thousand fighters came.
Muhammad commenced bombardment on April 6. Although he tried to go over, through, and under the walls, he made little headway. Some six weeks after he had started pummeling Constantinople, he was no nearer his goal.
So he assembled and exhorted his men for one last-ditch effort: “As it happens in all battles, some of you will die, as it is decreed by fate for each man,” he began. “Recall the promises of our Prophet concerning fallen warriors in the Koran: the man who dies in combat shall be transported bodily to Paradise and shall dine with Mohammed in the presence of women, handsome boys, and virgins.”
Even so, Sultan Muhammad knew that rewards in the now were always preferable to promises in the hereafter. As Sheikh Akshemsettin had earlier told him, “You well know, that most of the soldiers [particularly the dreaded Janissaries] have in any case been converted [to Islam] by force. The number of those who are ready to sacrifice their lives for the love of Allah is extremely small. On the other hand, if they glimpse the possibility of winning booty they will run towards certain death.”
So the “Sultan swore… that his warriors would be granted the right to sack everything, to take everyone, male or female, and all property or treasure which was in the city.”
Any Muslim still uninspired by the boons of the here or hereafter was left with a final thought: “If I see any man lurking in the tents and not fighting at the wall,” warned the sultan, “he will not be able to escape a lingering death,” a reference to Muhammad’s favorite form of punishment, impalement (which Vlad the Impaler -- “Dracula” -- wasintroduced to while a “ward” in the sultan’s court). Muhammad’s “announcement was received with great joy,” and from thousands of throats came waves of thundering cries of “Allahu Akbar!” and “There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his prophet!”
“Oh! If you had heard their voices raised to heaven,” wondered a Christian behind the wall, “you would have been struck dumb with amazement… We … were amazed at such religious fervor, and begged God with copious tears to be well disposed towards us.”
The all-out assault was set for May 29. Fanatics of all sorts were set loose to inspire the men on the previous day. Wandering “dervishes visited the tents, to instill the desire of martyrdom, and the assurance of spending an immortal youth amidst the rivers and gardens of paradise, and in the embraces of the black-eyed virgins [the fabled houris].” Criers swept throughout the camp to horn blasts:
Children of Muhammad, be of good heart, for tomorrow we shall have so many Christians in our hands that we will sell them, two slaves for a ducat, and will have such riches that we will all be of gold, and from the beards of the Greeks we will make leads for our dogs, and their families will be our slaves. So be of good heart and be ready to die cheerfully for the love of our Muhammad.
Finally, on May 29, around 2 a.m., Muhammad unleashed all hell against Constantinople: to blasting sounds of trumpets, cymbals, and Islamic war-cries, cannon fire lit the horizon as ball after ball came careening into the wall.
After the initial bombardment, wave after wave of hordes came, all desirous of booty or paradise -- or merely of evading impalement. With ladders and hooks, they fought, clawed, and clambered onto the wall. “Who could narrate the voices, the cries of the wounded, and the lamentation that arose on both sides?” recollected an eyewitness. “The shouts and din went beyond the boundaries of heaven.”
After two hours of this, thousands of Ottomans lay dead beneath the wall. Regardless, Muhammad continued ordered more waves of Turks to crash against the wall. They built and clawed atop human pyramids of their own dead and wounded, all while cannon balls careened and crashed -- to no avail. Having the high ground, the Christians slew countless Muslims. “One could only marvel at the brutes,” conceded a defender. “Their army was being annihilated, and yet they dared to approach the fosse again and again.”
By 4 a.m. nonstop cannon fire had made several breaches. A small detachment of Turks entered the city through a minor doorway which the defenders had left open during the chaos.
One Hassan -- “a giant of a beast” -- slew all before him and inspired other Turks to press in behind him. They quickly planted the Islamic flag, causing consternation among the defenders. When a well-aimed stone took Hassan down, he continued swinging his scimitar on one knee until, riddled and “overwhelmed by arrows,” he was welcomed into paradise by the houris. “By then, the whole host of the enemy were on our walls and our forces were put to flight.” Thousands of invaders flooded in and slaughtered the outnumbered defenders; others were trampled underfoot and “crushed to death” by the press of men.
Crying, “The City is lost, but I live,” Emperor Constantine XI stripped and flung off his royal regalia and “spurred on his horse and reached the spot where the Turks were coming in large numbers.” With his steed he “knocked the impious from the walls” and with “his drawn sword in his right hand, he killed many opponents, while blood was streaming from his legs and arms.” Inspired by their lord, men shouting “Better to die!” rushed into and were consumed by the oncoming throng. “The Emperor was caught up among these, fell and rose again, then fell once more.”
Thus “he died by the gate with many of his men, like any commoner, after having reigned for three years and three months,” concludes a chronicler. And on that May 29, 1453, the 2,206-year-old Roman state died with him, and “the saying,” observed another contemporary, “was fulfilled: ‘It started with Constantine [the Great, who founded Constantinople, or “New Rome” in 325] and it ended with Constantine [XI].’”
Even so, by holding out against Islam for as long as it did -- eight centuries -- Constantinople had saved the West. As Byzantine historian John Julius Norwich explains, “Had the Saracens captured Constantinople in the seventh century rather than the fifteenth, all Europe -- and America -- might be Muslim today.”
Note: The above account was excerpted and adapted from the author’s recent book, Sword and Scimitar: Fourteen Centuries of War between Islam and the West. Unless noted otherwise, all quotes come from contemporary eyewitnesses and primary sources documented therein.
Jihad: Islam's Engine
By Amil Imani
Right
from the start, violent jihad served as the engine of Islam under the command
and supervision of Muhammad himself. To understand how quickly Islam
spread around the world, we must see the timeline of Islam.
After
Muhammad's death in 632 A.D., his friend Abu Bakr was named caliph and
ruler of the Islamic community, or Ummah. Muhammad's followers in a
short time occupied a vast geographic area; conversion to Islam was
heightened by Islamic missionaries, who intermingled with local
populations to promulgate the Islamic teachings. It resulted
in Islam's spread outward from Mecca toward both
the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans and the creation of the
Muslim world.
In
no time at all, Islam spread like a pandemic. Once it attacked the
mind of its victims, this debilitating disease was capable of transforming them
into helpless pawns that had no choice but to execute what they were directed
to do.
Here
is the truth, as bitter as it may be. Islam is the
culprit. Islam is anything but a religion of
peace. Violence is at the core of Islam. Violence is
institutionalized in the Muslim's holy book, the Qur'an, in many verses:
Qur'an:
9:5: "Fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them
captive, harass them, lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of
war."
Qur'an:
9:112: "The Believers fight in Allah's cause; they slay and are slain,
kill and are killed."
Qur'an:
8:39: "So fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief
[non-Muslims]) and all submit to the religion of Allah alone (in the whole
world)."
Qur'an:
8:65: "O Prophet, urge the faithful to fight. If there are
twenty among you with determination they will vanquish two hundred; if there
are a hundred then they will slaughter a thousand unbelievers, for the infidels
are a people devoid of understanding."
Qur'an:
9:38: "Believers, what is the matter with you, that when you are asked to
go forth and fight in Allah's Cause you cling to the earth? Do you
prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? Unless you go forth,
He will afflict and punish you with a painful doom, and put others in your
place."
That's
what the Qur'an commands the believer repeatedly – to make jihad on even the people
of the book, Jews and Christians. Islam
essentially invented the idea that Christians, Jews, and pagans are an
abomination and offensive to Allah and that their very existence represents an
attack upon the self-defined Islamic right to reign over the
world. Allah thus enlists Muslim believers to eradicate by force
those who offend him and, by disbelieving, prevent his rule. True
Muslim believers therefore become the enforcers, hit men and mercenaries for
their god, in order to establish a global caliphate for their parasitic
clergy. Their targets are artificially constructed adversaries.
Muslim
believers hence are instructed to fear the "great Satan" and are told
that if they do not live up to Allah's calls to jihad, they themselves are
offensive to Allah and to their families.
Now,
the only question that remains is the extent of a Muslim's obedience to the
Qur'an and the Sunna, the life examples of Muhammad. To be sure, a
great many Muslims are not following the dictates of the Qur'an verbatim, as
they should, since they consider it to be the literal immutable perfect words
of Allah.
Furthermore,
nowhere do I say all Muslims believe in shedding the blood of
others. Yet the commandments of the Qur'an to believers are clear
and emphatic. It is for this reason that an innumerable number of
Muslims do engage in jihad and suicide volunteers vie with one
another to offer their services to their handler leaders.
A
true Muslim does not and cannot believe in freedom of choice. In the
religion of Islam – Submission – everything is up to Allah, as clearly and
repeatedly stipulated in the Qur'an. The raison
d'ĂȘtre for the Muslim is to be unconditionally submissive to the will
and dictates of Allah. Everything a "good" Muslim does is
contingent upon the will and decree of Allah, he is indoctrinated to believe.
To
cut to the chase, we need to eliminate some disinformation and myths about the
"war on terror." We are not fighting
terrorism. We are engaging in an ideological battle between freedom,
conservatism, democracy, individual rights, capitalism, and
"Christian" ethics and Islamofascism, communism-socialism, theocracy,
and tyranny.
There
are also internationalist, dictatorial, globalist forces that seek to use the
conflict to create an international government and the unification of all
religions by the destruction of nationalism, patriotism, individual rights, and
sectarianism.
It
is not "fanatical," "radical," or "extreme" Islam
that we are fighting, but normal, orthodox, canonical, typical, accepted,
traditional Islam, straight from the mouth of Muhammad. Islam is
violent in direct proportion to its mission and scripture. The
so-called fanatics and terrorists are only upholding the truth of their
principles.
In
short: We must begin to declare Islam evil, not from a sectarian perspective,
but from a universal, humanist one. Every encroachment of Islam as a
religion must be rejected and discouraged by all people
everywhere. Any leftist who attempts to give aid and comfort to this
religion of hate must be denounced and frustrated at every turn. Otherwise,
get used to your radioactive suit and your fallout shelter, a standard of
living – and a level of freedom – one tenth of what you have today.
‘I Will Kill You and Eat Your Corpses’: Deported Radical Imam Told Prison Guards
13 Jan 2019149
1:59
Tunisian radical imam Mahmoud Jebali, who is set for deportation
after coming to Italy as an illegal immigrant, threatened to kill prison
officers.
The
31-year-old imam came to Italy illegally through the port in Lampedusa and was
well-known to police having committed several violent crimes in the past.
Italian authorities initially jailed him on a conviction for robbery but were
finally able to expel him to Tunisia this week, Il Giornale reports.
While in a prison in Padua, the Tunisian is said to have
become a leader among the radical Muslims with an officer from the Central
Investigation Unit of the Penitentiary Police (NIC) saying, “He had never
had a quiet attitude, he was controversial and arrogant with the
agents, he had begun to intensify his religious practice so much that he became
a charismatic leader for other Muslim prisoners.”
Breitbart TV
“The Friday prayer ceremony was held in his cell and
he dressed in the typical tunic of an imam,” they added.
Italy’s Salvini Deports Islamic Extremist
Who Wanted to Kill ‘White Tourists’ and ‘Christians’ https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2018/10/13/italys-salvini-deports-islamic-extremist-who-wanted-to-kill-white-tourists-and-christians/ …
Italy's Salvini Deports Islamist Wanting to Kill ‘White
Tourists,’ ‘Christians’
The officer also explained that Jebali had made threats
against prison officers telling them, “Sooner or later you will all die, we
will go into your houses and kill you and eat your corpses.”
“We began to keep an eye on him after he threatened an
officer,” the NIC officer said and noted that the Tunisian had also liked
a video on Facebook celebrating the death of Christians. Following the
investigation against the 31-year-old, they established he could pose a terror
threat and could deport him.
Jebadi joins
a long list of deported radical Islamists deported from Italy under Interior
Minister Matteo Salvini, who has set the record for the most radicals deported from a European Union
member state in 2018, with the country deporting around ten radicals per month.
Former Jihadist Reveals Network Smuggling
Islamic Radicals to Europe as Illegal Migrants https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2019/01/10/former-jihadist-reveals-islamic-radicals-coming-italy-illegal-migrants/ …
Italy Uncovers Network Smuggling Islamic Radicals as
Illegal Migrants
Follow Chris Tomlinson on
Twitter at @TomlinsonCJ or email
at ctomlinson(at)breitbart.com
1,400 Years of Jihad and
Islamic Terror, Well Told by Robert Spencer
Robert Spencer is the man,
the best prepared person to write a comprehensive history of the horrors of
Islam.
And he has.
Spencer's The History of Jihad: From Muhammad to ISIS is an amazing book, extraordinary in
its detail and riveting in its narratives and analysis.
This book documents the history of
horrors, violence, brutality, oppression, conquests by the sword, beheadings of
hundreds of thousands (probably millions), destruction of civilizations and
cultures, corruption, deception, and lies that are part of the Islamist
culture, and every other evil that you can imagine that one group of humans
could impose on others in the name of an ideology or, in this case, a
pseudo-religion. The book is a comprehensive history of the role of
war and terror in the spread of Islam, and the book details 1,400 years of
sheer evil with no relief, imposed on the Middle East, Eastern Europe, North
Africa, the Iberian Peninsula, India, and Asia. The only let-up in
these killings that ever came was when some of the cultures and
civilizations successfully repulsed the monsters, or else were conquered and
then violently and rapidly subdued.
Spencer briskly traces the 1,400-year war
of Islamic jihadis against the rest of the world, detailing the jihad against
Europe, including the 700-year struggle to conquer Constantinople; the jihad in
Spain, where non-Muslims fought for another 700 years to get the jihadi
invaders out of the country; and the jihad against India, where Muslim warriors
and conquerors wrought unparalleled and unfathomable devastation in the name of
their religion.
Spencer adds to the drama and impact by telling much of the tale in the words of contemporary chroniclers themselves, both Muslim and non-Muslim. The History of Jihad shows that jihad warfare has been a constant of Islam from its very beginning, its major focus. In fact, in reading the stories and considering the historical realities, it is safe to say that the Islamists were constantly on the hunt and constantly bloodthirsty – thirsty for conquest and focused on plunder. That is what proves that the history of Islamism is consistent with present-day jihad terrorism, and that present-day jihad proceeds along exactly the same ideological and theological foundations as did the great Islamic warrior-states and jihadi commanders of the past.
The book is worthwhile now as a lesson in history in an age when Islamic jihadis are more assertive in Western countries than they have been for centuries, and propaganda and deception are tools well developed in a culture that approves of deception and promotes conquest. Taqiyya is the Muslim word for approved deception of the non-believer, which raises the question for today: at which point can a non-Muslim trust the promise of a jihadi or any Muslim?
Spencer adds to the drama and impact by telling much of the tale in the words of contemporary chroniclers themselves, both Muslim and non-Muslim. The History of Jihad shows that jihad warfare has been a constant of Islam from its very beginning, its major focus. In fact, in reading the stories and considering the historical realities, it is safe to say that the Islamists were constantly on the hunt and constantly bloodthirsty – thirsty for conquest and focused on plunder. That is what proves that the history of Islamism is consistent with present-day jihad terrorism, and that present-day jihad proceeds along exactly the same ideological and theological foundations as did the great Islamic warrior-states and jihadi commanders of the past.
The book is worthwhile now as a lesson in history in an age when Islamic jihadis are more assertive in Western countries than they have been for centuries, and propaganda and deception are tools well developed in a culture that approves of deception and promotes conquest. Taqiyya is the Muslim word for approved deception of the non-believer, which raises the question for today: at which point can a non-Muslim trust the promise of a jihadi or any Muslim?
Read this book and understand that
faithful and observant Muslims are part of the jihad, as commanded by Islam and
Allah, whether armed or not, and thus cannot be assumed to be
"peaceful" since Islam is all about conquest at any cost and
oppression or destruction of the kafir non-believer
(infidel). Consider the attitude of Islamists for the non-believer
in this 1,300-plus-year saga that extends all the way into the early
21st century – the Muslim philosophy that is nothing but hair-on-fire
murderous when directed at non-believers. That is why beheading is
so common among their jihadis. They hate, and they want to strike
terror in the hearts of their enemies. Their enemies are anyone who
is not a Muslim.
With this logic, an easy argument to make
is that there is no place for national loyalties in the mind of a Muslim –
and in fact, one of the internal conflicts in Islam itself is
its rejection of secular, or less than sharia law,
nations. However, a method for conquest that includes some deception
is approved by Islam, and when a Muslim swears an oath to the United States, for
example, it is a deception for the benefit of the conquest, and
that certainly that would be approved by Allah. Muhammad
himself broke treaties and lied to advance his cause, and he clearly taught
that deception to advance the cause of Islam is not immoral, but to be promoted
and utilized for jihad.
This brings us to today.
This book is indispensable to
understanding the geopolitical situation of the twenty-first century and
ultimately to formulating strategies to deal with the Islamist threat and defeating
radical Islamist terror.
It's critical to know and understand this
for context, yet that's not being done. It's certainly not being
done by the wimpy Western intellectuals and politicians, intimidated by the
well-developed Islamic propaganda machine.
Knowing the enemy is essential to survival
and victory. To underestimate a threat and the nature of the enemy
is suicide. Spencer has long been the leading historian of the
nature of Islamic violence and conquest, and now he's telling the story of
the monstrous movement that is Islam. His grasp of the history
of, and the important events and figures within, Islam from the beginnings to
the present is unexcelled. In reading this book, it's obvious he is
the go-to guy for scholarship on the theology, or what is more properly the
ideology dressed up like theology, of Islam as we can see it.
It's also important that he be listened
to. These days, it is taken for granted, even among many
Washington policymakers, that Islam is a fundamentally peaceful religion and
that Islamic jihad terrorism is something relatively new, a product of the
economic and political ferment of the twentieth century. It's not
true. In The History of Jihad, Spencer proves
definitively that Islamic terror is as old as Islam itself, as old as Muhammad,
the prophet of Islam, who said: "I have been made victorious through
terror." He had been a highwayman and terrorist for years
before he founded his religion, dying in 632.
Reading the details of the killings is not
only alarming, but exhausting. I learned that some Islamist leaders
spent all their time killing and torturing people and taking woman and children
as slaves, both sex slaves and house slaves.
I also learned that Islam had a limited
economic base – effectively confined to conquest and
slavery. Muslims were effectively a criminal enterprise, and
anything they acquired of value came from the end of a sword or the threat
of death or torture.
The book is a long serial of bloodbaths
and terrorist outrages.
I challenge any reader to keep track of
the killers and the magnitude of the killing (millions died) in places such
as North Africa and the Asian subcontinent, or the number of churches,
shrines, temples of the non-believers destroyed and replaced with
mosques. Civilizations decimated – it is a disgusting thing, Islam,
and to keep track of the appalling conduct requires copious note-taking
and remains difficult to grasp. Spencer tells a terrible tale,
indeed, yet all Western intellectuals can do is talk about the conduct of
the crusaders.
The Spencer book will cure the reader of
that silly nonsense. One reads too many stories in the book of
Muslim victors doing mass executions of enemies to have any fury left for
crusaders. Muslim conquerors were positively steeped in violence and
bloodshed – stacking the heads of their enemies high and raping all of
their women, executing hundreds of thousands, and far more than can be
accurately counted.
I spent uncomfortable hours reading the of
the horrors of Islam and sometimes had to take a break from the bloodletting –
it is and was a movement of prodigious killing and torture – but then one must
remember that it is an ideology and a movement built on terror. If
you hang in and wade through the gore and the blood, which is the main
story for more than 400 pages, you will realize that the Islamist conquest was
rivaled only by communism in the number of people annihilated and the
civilizations destroyed, by terror, torture, oppression. Only a
fanatic ideology can produce killing and evil on this prodigious scale.
Most important, Spencer is our ally in the
war against the evil and treacherous phony "religion" that is nothing
more than a corrupt ideology of conquest, xenophobia, and
misanthropy. What is unfortunate is that people don't pay attention
to Spencer, who can, in a wink, extinguish the idea that Islam is a religion,
and with certainty demonstrates that it has no place in any credible vision of
peace, as the Western politicians and intellectuals have claimed and as so
many leftists continue to babble on about. To try to make a case for
Islam as a religion of peace after reading what Islamists did for the last
1,400 years is nonsense. Spencer underlines that Islam, and its practitioners,
above all, are all about conquest.
A TINY
MINORITY OF HALF A MILLION JIHADISTS
Islamic terrorists are the world’s eighth
largest military.
Islamic terrorists are a “tiny minority of extremists”. That’s the
message we’ve been hearing ever since 9/11. They’re only a handful of “guys in
a cave” or a few “lone wolves” radicalized over the internet.
How tiny is that tiny minority?
According to a study by
the Center for Strategic and International Studies, there are 230,000
Jihadists.
Put this tiny minority of extremists together in a city and you
would have Boise, Idaho, or Richmond, Virginia, or Des Moines, Iowa. But that’s
not a roster of Muslim civilians who support Islamic terrorism, just active
members of terrorist groups. And so a better point of comparison is to national
armies.
At 230,000, Sunni Islamic Jihadists outnumber the British Armed
Forces (149,000), the French Armed Forces (117,000), and Germany's Bundeswehr
(179,753). That should be troubling since those are some of the militaries and
countries on the front lines of Europe’s reluctant fight against Islamic
incursions.
The list of Sunni fighters has a lot of questions marks and is incomplete.
Sunnis outnumber Shiites, but under the Iranian umbrella, Shiites have fielded
sizable terror forces in Iraq, Lebanon and Yemen.
Hezbollah in Lebanon boasts between 25,000 to 65,000 Jihadists.
The Houthis in Yemen, currently the beneficiaries of a massive propaganda
campaign in the media, have around 25,000 to 30,000 Jihadists. Iraqi PMU’s add
another 90,000 to 150,000 Jihadists to these numbers. And finally there’s
Iran’s own Revolutionary Guard, a regional terror hub with another 120,000
members.
These numbers add between 260,000 and 365,000 Jihadists on the
Shiite side for a total of over half a million Sunni and Shiite Jihadists
making Islamic terrorists the world’s eighth largest military.
That’s not a tiny minority of extremists and it’s not a few guys
in a chat room or a cave.
This dark army of terror grew by leaps and bounds under the Obama
administration which fractured Sunni countries by overthrowing their
governments in and bringing Islamists to power in the Arab Spring, while the
Iran nuke deal fed and freed up billions for Iran to invest in Shiite
expansionism.
The CSIS report notes that the
number of Salafi Jihadists and allied terror groups more than doubled between
2008 and 2016. Despite the Iraq War, during Bush’s second term, the increase
was fairly light. The stratospheric increase, from the thirties to the sixties,
took place during the Obama years.
The estimated number of Jihadist fighters rose from a high of
100,000 in 2008 to 250,000 in 2016.
The mass deaths in Syria, Libya and Yemen (to name some of the
worst Arab Spring trouble spots) are a direct result of the policies and, in Libya
of the military intervention, of the Obama administration.
Lefty twitter brims with propagandas photos of supposed Yemeni
children starving to death. The media has tried to blame the religious war
between Sunnis and Shiites (and their Saudi and Iranian backers) on President
Trump. But dead children in Yemen are the wages of the foreign policy of Hope
and Change.
As the Democrats and the Republican foreign policy establishment
advocate for Jamal Khashoggi, intervention in Syria and support for the Palestinian
Authority, it is urgent to remember that these are the same old failed policies
that led to a 150% increase in Jihadists and killed over 500,000 people in
Syria, and cost the lives of tens of thousands more in Yemen and Libya. And
elsewhere in the region.
“Democratization” is a poisoned Islamist chalice. At its cloudy
bottom lie terror and death.
The media has accused President Trump of a callous indifference to
human life for putting American national interests ahead of Khashoggi, an
Islamist pal of Osama bin Laden. But it’s the media radicals whose horrid
idealism put half a million people into the ground in the service of the
region’s Islamists.
Khashoggi’s Islamist political agenda killed enough people to
qualify as its own genocide.
Half a million dead and half a million Jihadists rampaging around
the world are the outcome of an idealistic foreign policy in which chattering
class lefties allowed Islamists like Khashoggi to call the shots. The tiny
minority of extremists was never that tiny, but it grew to a monstrous size
with massive infusions of cash and military interventions plotted by Islamists
and implemented by Washington D.C.
Many of the 70,000 Jihadists in Syria were directly or indirectly
funded by the Obama administration. As were many of the 5,000 Jihadists in
Libya, where Obama’s illegal military intervention led to everything from a
near Al Qaeda takeover of Mali to the flow of surface-to-air missiles to Hamas
terrorists.
Major terror groups and state sponsors of terror from Pakistan to
Iran to the Palestinian Authority also saw huge cash transfers from American
taxpayers to Islamic terrorists.
In his first year in office, Obama signed off on a $7.5 billion
aid package for Pakistan. The Islamic terror state repaid us by harboring Osama
bin Laden and aiding Islamic terrorists killing American soldiers.
This year, President Trump made drastic cuts to foreign aid to
Pakistan after tweeting, “The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more
than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us
nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools.”
We’re still foolishly funding Jihadists, including the tens of
thousands of members of the Palestinian Authority’s security forces, even after
their leader, Abbas, called for the destruction of the White House.
CSIS doesn’t list the Islamic terror militias in the Terrorist
Occupied Territories in Israel. That leaves the tens of thousands of Jihadists
in Hamas, Fatah and other Palestinian Authority TOT terror groups out of the
calculations. These groups are not just a threat to Israel. Hamas is an arm of
the Muslim Brotherhood and is backed by Iran. Its skills and resources are at
the disposal of allied terror groups.
That’s how Iran’s Hezbollah assisted Al Qaeda in its preparations
for 9/11. It’s why Iran is aiding the Taliban today. An Islamic terror group or
terrorist anywhere is a link in a global terror network.
That is the understanding that made ISIS so deadly, striking from
Iraq to Paris to New York.
Islamic terrorists are not a tiny minority of half a million. They
are not an aberration. They are everywhere. And the failed foreign
establishment funded and aided many of them.
Military interventions spread them, democratization brought them
to power and immigration transplanted them from war zones into our countries.
Their numbers have more than doubled in a decade. If the Left gets to set
foreign policy again, in another generation there will be millions.
If we want to avert that outcome, our interventions, regime change
and immigration policies must all objectively meet the test of making
societies, including our own, less Islamist, not more so. Foreign aid should be
barred by law from going to any country or militia whose goal is to establish
Islamic theocracy by force. Any intervention must be objectively shown to make
a society less bound to Islamic law. And immigration policy must be aimed at
reducing the percentage of Islamists in the United States.
Otherwise the next Islamic civil war won’t be fought in Syria, but
in the United States of America.
FROM COUNTERING ENEMY
PROPAGANDA TO PROMOTING
IT
How
we produce enemy propaganda against ourselves.
November 27, 2018
The
West, particularly the left, not only believes the enemy’s big lie that “Islam
means peace”, but we propagate the lie ourselves. And we do this while blaming
ourselves for the Islamic enemy’s jihad on us. This corrupt state of ours began
with our pretending that inferior cultures aren’t inferior and superior
cultures aren’t superior. It began when we told nice lies about rotten cultures
and rotten lies about great cultures. It began with the double poison of
political correctness and multiculturalism, which spawned Islamic correctness.
This self-destructive rot in the West allows the enemy to remain undefeated 17
years after 9/11, and it allows many of us to utter “Islam means peace” no
matter what Islam preaches, no matter what Muslims do, no matter what horrors
we witness with our own eyes.
And
our refusal to challenge the enemy’s big lie, besides a number of disparate
individuals across the West, and a handful of organizations like The Freedom
Center and others, has corrupted the West on all levels, from art, to politics,
to news, to media, to academia, to think tanks. According to some reports,
Saudi Arabia is considering buying Legendary Entertainment, which produces
comic books and movies. And if that goes through, (other reports say Legendary
isn’t interested in selling to Saudi Arabia) it is guaranteed to produce more
Islam-friendly entertainment. But looking at how Islam-friendly 99% of our
entertainment is, why is the Saudi government bothering? They used to have to
buy people to kiss Islam’s ass, but now it’s done for free.
In
comic books, Muslim superheroes are being shoved down reader’s throats, without
demand, and without much interest even from Muslims. In TV, there’s always that
kind, wise Muslim teaching Westerners the errors of their ways. And this goes
for movies as well, where Muslims are only portrayed as victims or heroes.
Just
today, the illiberal New York Times celebrated Mohammad, the warlord founder of
Islam whose religion motivates the Islamic enemy’s war on the West. They
published a piece of enemy propaganda by a Muslim, Haroon Moghul, called “Happy Birthday, Muhammad.” This
is disgraceful. The civilized world’s newspapers shouldn’t be celebrating a
warlord whose war continues to murder innocents over a thousand years after his
death. A newspaper located in the same city of the worst attack against
non-Muslims ever perpetrated by Mohammad’s followers.
And
yet only a minority will find this to be intolerable, as most people have
become inured to it, thanks to Islam’s rabid propagandists, coupled with the
left’s rabid propagandists. I still get shocked at how much undeserved praise
Islam gets, and how much it gets away with murder. And I’m glad I still have
the capacity to get shocked, as I’ve never made peace with this intolerable
state of ours, and I never will. But the truth does break out from time to
time, even in unexpected places, and millions are exposed to it, in a
surprising way.
The
BBC TV series, Bodyguard, was such a big hit in
the UK, and now on Netflix, not only because it’s well done, with great
writing, acting and production quality, but because it tells the truth, in the
end. In the end, it shows us a truth that nearly no entertainment does today, regarding
the Islamic enemy and our willful blindness about it. That’s why the UK went
crazy over it. Westerners are dying to hear the truth. We’re sick and tired of
being lied to every single day about what we’re facing in the Islamic threat.
SPOILER:
The
show saved the best for last, as it revealed a truth about us and the Islamic
enemy. Seeing the hero of the story, who fought the Islamic enemy overseas as a
British soldier, and who should be wise to it, get fooled by a Muslim who
played victim in the premiere, only to reveal herself as a cold-blooded
jihadist in the finale, speaks to the West’s refusal to see the enemy for what
it is. This enemy is as brutal as it is deceitful. Everything is a weapon to
it, including words and emotions. And the Islamic enemy, through this show,
reveals itself in a way I don’t recall seeing in post-9/11 shows that deal with
terrorism. And yes, I’ve seen nearly all the ones that have been offered in TV
and movies, and I’ve enjoyed some, particularly 24, but these shows always push
the lie that jihadists are perverters of Islam, or that they’re noble in their
own way, or that they’re mere dupes to some evil politicians and businessmen,
etc., and we’re so used to those lies, that when the truth is told, it lifts a
good show to great heights.
END
SPOILER
So
while many in the West have allowed themselves to fall for the lies about
Islam, the truth still breaks out in unexpected ways. So of course the show has
been branded “Islamophobic” by Muslims and leftists. The show has a killer
ending, and yes, I’m Shocked that the BBC aired it. But I’m not shocked that it
was a major success with Millions of viewers.
And one last thing: Leftist Hollywood has had 17 years to show how
down they are for Islam, but even they haven’t pulled the trigger and had a
Muslim play the lead in one of their blockbuster action films. I know someone
will tell me, “Don’t give them any ideas”, or “You know that’s just around the
corner”, or even, “They Already Have!”, but the fact is, in 17 years, they
haven’t put their millions where their mouths are. Why? Because even they know
that they can’t get away with completely ignoring jihad as they have, and then
hit us with a hero who shares the same religion as the enemy at war with us.
They can’t get away with it. And they know it. So things are bad, but the truth
always gets out, no matter the lies that are concocted to stifle it. The Truth
Always Gets Out.
A radical muslim wants to cut your head off. A peaceful muslim
is praying that a radical muslim cuts your head off.
ISLAM: FROM THE DELUSIONAL TO THE
DANGEROUS
A 1,400-year-old primeval testimony of indoctrination and conquest.
October 3,
2018
It has been widely asserted by many
psychologists that human beings act upon their beliefs. Well, if this is true,
we can deduce that beliefs direct people in life, and while some beliefs are
harmless, some are the motivating force for good, others are delusional,
misguided, and even outright dangerous.
In my opinion, every version of the belief
called “Islam” ranges from the delusional to the dangerous.
Islam is a fantasy, birthed by Muhammad’s
delusion that he relayed to his first wife and employer, Khadija. Greatly frightened, he
told Khadija that he was visited by a jinn (devil) in the Hira cave. Khadija
comforted the distraught man by assuring him that the episode was Allah’s way
of choosing him as his messenger.
Muhammad believed his rich wife/employer,
who was 15 years his senior and the delusion became a belief: Islam. Remarkably
enough, under the early tutelage of Khadija, Muhammad succeeded in attracting
influential followers. Before long, the movement gathered more and more power
through violent campaigns, and the faith was taken to new people and foreign
lands.
This impressive delusion, Islam, presently
has in its stranglehold in over a billion humans, posing an existential threat
to all non-Muslims.
Islam is rooted in the primitive tribal
mentality of “Us against Them,” “We the righteous against the heathens,” “We
the servants submissive to the Great Allah against the rebellious enemies of
Allah.” Islam is a polarizer. Islam is an enemy-maker. To Islam, a non-Muslim
is a combatant against Allah, and he is fair game to be subjugated and killed.
When some billion and a half people adhere to the pathological belief of Islam
and use it as their marching orders for life, the rest of humanity can ignore
the threat only at its own peril.
After 1400 years, Islam is still on a
campaign of conquest throughout the known world. Hordes of life-in-hand
foot-soldier fanatical Muslims are striving to kill and get killed. All they
want is the opportunity to discharge their homicidal-suicidal impulse, on their
way to Allah’s promised glorious afterlife. And in the background, granting the
foot-soldiers’ wishes, are their handlers, the puppeteers, who pull the strings
and detonate these human bombs.
Those who cherish life must recognize these
emissaries of death, what makes them, what motivates them, and how best to
defend against them. The campaign of death waged by these Islamic jihadists, be
he a puppet or a puppeteer, is energized by the belief of delectable rewards
that await the faithful implementer of Allah’s dictates.
Through a highly effective indoctrination,
the jihadist has come to believe firmly in Islam’s absolute delusion. He
believes that Allah is the one and only supreme creator of the heavens and the
Earth; that it is his duty and privilege, to abide by Allah’s will and carry
out his plans at all costs. He believes firmly in a gloriously wonderful
immortal afterlife in paradise, for which a martyr’s death is the surest quickest
admission. Although the dominating theme of the delusion is quasi-spiritual,
the promised rewards of the afterlife awaiting the martyr are sensual and
material.
All the things and activities that the
jihadist desires and cannot attain or practice, and rejects in his earthly
life, will be purified and proffered to him in the paradise of the next life.
Thus goes the delusion.
As I have asserted in my previous articles,
it is important to understand that the human mind is not a perfect discerner of
objective reality. Reality is in the eye of the beholder. The outside world
only supplies bits and pieces of raw material that the mind puts together to
form its reality. Depending on the type and number of bits and pieces that a
given mind receives, its reality can be very different from that of another
mind. The more prescribed and homogeneous a group, the greater is the group’s
consensual reality, since the members share much in common, experiential input
and reinforce each other’s’ mindset.
Thus members of a given religious order,
for instance, tend to think much more similarly to one another than to members
of other groups with different experiential histories. Various approximations
of the objective reality, therefore, rule the mind. The degree to which these
approximations deviate from the larger group’s consensual reality determines
its delusional extent and severity.
A methamphetamine user’s reality
is often distorted in a different way. Under the influence of the drug, an
intense paranoia overtakes him. His reality is dominated by the belief that one
or more people are lurking about to harm or kill him. He may wield a deadly
weapon, going from room to room, from closet to closet, in search of the
assailants.
If you believe that a bug is camping deeply
inside your body, then you might go ahead and try to dig the non-existent bug
out. If you believe that people are lurking around the house to harm or kill
you, you go after them before they get to you. If you believe that all the
troubles of the world are due to the evil-doings of the non-Muslims who war
against Allah, then you do all you can to fight and kill them, particularly
since Allah tells you to do so in the Quran. The drug-induced delusions are
hallucinations.
They are dramatic and usually transitory, while
religiously-based implantation of ideas program the mind with lasting
delusions. Delusions, even when they are at great variance from the objective
reality, can rule the mind without the need for drugs, or because of
neurological dysfunctions or other factors. The young and the less-educated are
most vulnerable to believe the claims of charlatans, con artists, and cunning
clerics, as truth and reality.
The repeated intense indoctrination of the
children even changed the perception of some of the charlatan mullahs or the
imams, who believed their own lies and rushed to their own death clinging to
trinkets. Hence some of the puppeteers, in this instance, became puppets
themselves. Such are the folly and fallibility of the human mind.
It is, therefore, understandable that many
of the higher-up Islamic puppeteers, who are usually brainwashed from early
childhood, devote their fortunes and persons to the implementation of their
deeply ingrained delusions. Deluded by the threats and promises of Islam, Muslims,
rich or poor, vie with one another in furthering the violent cause of Allah.
Many non-Muslims are also victims of a
different, yet just as deadly, delusion. They believe that Islam is a religion
of peace, that only a small minority of Muslims are jihadists, and that Muslims
can be reasoned with to abandon the Quran-mandated elimination of
non-believers. These well-meaning simpletons are just as deluded as the fanatic
jihadists by refusing to acknowledge the fact that one cannot be a Muslim and
not abide by the dictates of the Quran.
No comments:
Post a Comment