“Our
entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become
a kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes. This
is the way a great country is raided by its elite.” – Karen McQuillan AMERICAN
THINKER.com
SAN FRANCISCO IN MELTDOWN
THE CITY OF DIANNE FEINSTEIN, KAMALA HARRIS, GAVIN NEWSOM and NANCY
PELOSI IS NOW ONE OF AMERICA’S GREATEST DISASTERS COMPARABLE TO MEXICO’S SECOND
LARGEST CITY OF LOS ANGELES!
May
19, 2019
larceny, shoplifting, and vandalism are included under this
ugly
umbrella. The rate of car break-ins is particularly striking: in
2017
day. Other low-level offenses, including
drug dealing, street
harassment, encampments, indecent exposure, public
intoxication,
simple assault, and disorderly conduct are also rampant.
Many in law enforcement blame the crime wave on Proposition 47,
which in 2014 downgraded possession of illegal narcotics for personal use and
theft of anything under $950 in value from felonies to misdemeanors.
Anti-incarceration advocates disagree with that argument, but theft is
indisputably booming, and narcotics activity is exploding on sidewalks, parks,
and playgrounds. When compounded with other
troubles for which the city is now infamous (human feces, filth, and homelessness, which
is up 17 percent since 2017), San
Franciscans find themselves surrounded by squalor and disorder.
“A lot of people are ready to leave because the crimes are causing
depression,” says Susan Dyer Reynolds, editor-in-chief of the Marina Times, an independent
community newspaper. “Navigation centers” for the
homeless, says Reynolds, “are not sober
facilities, and people steal and break into cars to feed their habits. Crime
will go up. We know this.”
Property and other supposedly low-level crimes are intensifying
the destruction of the retail market. Landmark Mission District stores are shuttering, citing theft and lack of security. In April, CVS closed two
pharmacies that had been ravaged by constant shoplifting. Mom-and-pop
businesses, wracked by so-called minor losses, find it impossible to survive.
Empty storefronts dot once-vibrant neighborhoods.
“Property and low-level crimes shrink the space for everyday
people and enlarge them for the people committing them,” says Nancy Tung, a
criminal prosecutor for two decades, who is running for district attorney in
the 2019 election. “If we continue down this path, we will see more people
leave San Francisco.” Tung will face a competitive field of opponents,
including Deputy Public Defender Chesa Boudin, a socialist and the son of two
convicted Weather Underground murderers, who wants to reduce criminal
sentences. Keeping people out of jail is the new social-justice battle; in
March, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that San Francisco’s bail policy violates the rights of poor defendants and brings no public benefit.
Meantime, the poor bear the brunt of low-level and property
crimes. “In the Tenderloin we have vulnerable populations—people of color, the
most children, the second-highest concentration of elders, and they are held
hostage by drug dealers and theft, and the city tells them these crimes are not
that bad,” says Tung. “We are failing to protect them. The police do a good
job, because the criminals are caught, only to be released back on the streets
over and over.”
David Young is board president of his building, located in the
South of Market neighborhood. In a recent six-month period, four windows were
smashed by vandals, and replacement costs are huge. “The everyday wear and tear
on your psyche gets to you,” says Young. “When we walk out the door, we know
that there is a 100 percent chance we’ll see someone on drugs, in various
states of undress, blood on sidewalks, and discarded sharps. These are crimes
no one in city hall seems to care about. When you say something about it,
you’re called a fascist.”
Until recently, Young says, San Francisco was an amazing place to
live. “Now people look at the city as an abscess,” he says. “The cost of
housing compared to the quality of life is way off. Everyone is talking about
it. Crime has been ignored for so long, and it’s gotten so huge. Serial repeat
offenders have no problem making bail, especially drug dealers, as they see it
as the cost of doing business.”
Some citizens are attempting to fight back. Frank Noto
cofounded Stop Crime: Neighborhood for Criminal Justice Accountability after an onslaught of break-ins. Neighbors had come together
for an art project, which drew crowds—but also crime rings. First tourists’
cars were hit, then residents’ cars, and then homes. So the group started a
court-watch program. They attended hearings and observed decisions, and they
noted a casual judicial approach to these cases. Their presence didn’t go
unnoticed. Judges know that they’re being scrutinized; one actually recused
himself. “We have to take a stand,” says Noto. “We talked to one guy, an
electrician, who’s been burglarized six times, and all of his tools have been
stolen. All we want is for the DA and judges to take this seriously.”
As for the San Francisco Police, they’re doing their best. “It
looks like hell here, but we are getting those people,” says San Francisco
Police Department Captain Carl Fabbri, who helms the Tenderloin police station.
“In our district, robberies are down 17 percent, burglaries are down 28
percent, and auto break-ins are down 26 percent. These results don’t just
happen. We’re getting the people off the streets even for two days. When
they’re in jail, we see an impact.”
The community benefits when criminals are incapacitated by being
locked up, but Fabbri, like Tung and Noto, thinks that low-level criminals are
released too quickly. “We could be keeping them and be giving services while
they’re in jail,” says Fabbri. “It could really be effective. We need changes
in the law and policies, to amend Proposition 47 and strengthen quality-of-life
laws.” Bail, too, should remain in place. “There is so much support of the
police here, more than you’d think,” says Fabbri. “Social media has turned the
tide. If you follow what we’re doing, you can see the difference we are
making.”
San Francisco’s lure persists. “There are more people from
different parts of the world coming here to build a life all the time,” says
Young. “It’s unquestionably a great place for opportunity, and culturally what
we have is incredible. But we’re not solving our problems when we pretend
low-level crimes aren’t important.” Committed residents are digging in, but if
the city doesn’t start changing its approach, how long will they last?
Erica Sandberg is a widely published consumer-finance
reporter based in San Francisco and the author of Expecting Money: The Essential Financial Plan for New and Growing
Families. As a community advocate, she focuses on homelessness and crime
and safety issues.
Pelosi’s Pacific Heights needs refugees
Pacific
Heights is one of San Francisco’s most expensive neighborhoods. It boasts
dramatic views of the Golden Gate Bridge, the Marin Headlands, and the blue waters
of San Francisco Bay.
Oracle
founder Larry Ellison is one of its more prominent and distinguished residents,
as is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
For all
its attractiveness as a neighborhood with its boutique shops and upscale
restaurants, Pacific Heights lacks two vital ingredients to make it a truly
great American neighborhood -- economic and cultural diversity.
That’s
why President Donald Trump’s plan to resettle “refugees” in sanctuary cities
should be embraced by Pacific Heights’ residents.
By inviting
the refugees now stranded at the border, Pacific Heights would not only
strengthen the sinew of its community but also contribute to alleviating the
humanitarian crisis at the border.
Our
strength is our diversity, and Pacific Heights lacks that strength. It is
culturally homogenous in a city that is diverse.
In San
Francisco, earning $117,000 a year or less makes you a low-income earner. Placing refugees in Pacific Heights where housing and
other costs are truly astronomical would require the compassion and economic
assistance of its residents. The former they have long signaled, and the latter
they are more than able to do.
Nancy
Pelosi lives in a walled mansion on a large expanse of land with majestic views. Her
mansion could easily house thirty or forty refugee families, and she is hardly
there. The expansive grounds could house dozens of refugee families in tents.
Imagine
refugee children who survived the arduous and life-threatening journey from
Central America playing on Pelosi’s lawn while breathing the clean and
invigorating air from off the San Francisco coastline. Imagine alleviating
the humanitarian crisis by creating additional tent cities in Pacific Heights’
splendid parks.
Pelosi,
through her holdings in local restaurants and vineyards, is reputed to be one
of the largest employers of illegal labor in Northern California.
Consequently, the people she would compassionately house might be able to find
work in her network of businesses, especially her fabled vineyard on the banks of the Napa River.
Pelosi
also owns a second mansion in the Wine Country north of San Francisco. This too
is walled and could hold dozens of refugee families.
Neither
Pelosi herself nor the community of Pacific Heights can solve the refugee
problem, but they could set a standard that other wealthy and pro-sanctuary
communities could easily emulate.
Just a
few miles away from Pacific Heights, my liberal acquaintances “Ann” and
“Christopher” live in a complex that is more difficult to enter than the
Central Intelligence Agency. They both support the sanctuary status of San
Francisco and think the border wall, but not their complex’s barrier, is immoral.
Ann is a big DACA supporter although she has been seen adroitly ignoring and
bypassing the homeless that proliferate in her neighborhood and sleep on her
streets. Her compassion obviously has its limits.
Their
complex boasts extensive patios between the stacks of apartments. These could
host a dozen or more tents and port-a-potties that could alleviate the cagelike
situations at the border that they lament as deplorable. Although these
facilities would constitute an eyesore and block the light and view Ann and
Christopher currently enjoy, creating a tent community for refugees would
demonstrate the concern and compassion that people like Ann and Christopher
love to remind the rest of us that they possess.
Real
compassion in Western Civilization derives from the Biblical sense of the term
and means to share in the suffering and emotions of others. When Jesus saw his
friends weeping at the grave of Lazarus, He wept with them and acted.
Compassion means to suffer with and to be motivated to take immediate action to
alleviate the suffering of others.
So, let
the virtue-signaling liberals in sanctuary cities who incessantly lecture us on
their commitment to taking in everyone, liberals who find the rest of us
insensitive and heartless, let them manifest in deed the compassion they so
relentlessly embrace in word. Let them fulfill the Biblical imperative to
suffer with and take immediate action.
And they
will be rewarded for this in knowing that their upscale white communities can
find new strength in the economic and cultural diversity that the refugees will
provide. I am looking forward to the sprouting of tent cities in Pacific
Heights and elsewhere in the upscale parts of San Francisco. Diversity is truly
a community’s strength.
Abraham
H. Miller is an emeritus professor of political science, University of
Cincinnati and a distinguished fellow with the Hyam Salomon Center
Pelosi - Illegals - Sunkist - Her investments!
ANYONE KNOW IF THE OL’ BARONESS AND CLOSET REPUBLICAN USES
ILLEGALS AT THER ST. HELENA, NAPA WINERY? SHE’S LOTHE TO PAY LEGALS A LIVING
WAGES. BUT THEN THE CATASTROPHIC NAPA FIRE WAS CAUSED BY ONE OF HER ILLEGALS,
SO PERHAPS HER PLACE BURNED DOWN!
Pelosi's corrupt insider passing of bills that make her rich.
________________________________________
Check for yourself
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home House District includes
San Francisco.
Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San Francisco, Pelosi's home
district.
Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor
to Pelosi.
Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of
the Samoan workforce.
Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 million dollars of
Star-Kist stock.
In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to
$7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so Del Monte would
not have to pay the higher wage. This would make Del Monte products less
expensive than their competition's.
Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed, Pelosi added an
earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an "economic
development credit in American Samoa".
Pelosi has called the Bush Administration "corrupt".
Check some more for yourself
San Francisco Homelessness Rises
17% After City Spends $300 Million Annually to Solve Problem
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2019/05/18/san-francisco-homeless-rises-17-after-city-spends-300-million-annually-to-solve-problem-n2546530
The San Francisco Chronicle reports that homelessness in the Golden City has risen by
17% since 2017 as more and more people live in their vehicles and as the city
spends hundreds of millions of taxpayer money in an attempt to solve the
problem.
The
report released Thursday shows that studies "indicate at least 1,153 more
homeless people are in the streets compared with two years ago, when the
federal tally set the total number at 6,858." The number, 8,011, was
determined using federal guidelines. According to the paper, this number is
actually most likely much lower than the city's own estimation set to be
released in July which uses different standards for homelessness.
Accordingly,
"The number of people living in cars, RVs and other vehicles has risen by
45% since the last one-night count was taken two years ago."
“I’m
really disappointed in these numbers,” said Jeff Kositsky, head of the city
Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing told the Chronicle. “I can
make no excuses. These numbers are bad, and we have to own that.
San
Francisco holds the most homeless people in the state of California, but
overall California has an astonishing 24% of the nation's homeless
population.
San
Francisco Mayor Breed says the answer to the problem, despite spending $300
million each year, is simply more spending. The somewhat recently elected mayor
is calling for help from regional and federal resources. "We need more
resources from the federal and state governments for housing, period, and we need to build housing faster. S.F. can’t do it alone," she told the paper.
“There’s
not just one thing that’s going to fix this,” she added. “I know this count
will discourage a lot of people, but it’s important to remember where we were
last year. Last year you saw a lot of big tent camps — like at 13th Street, and
now we have a beautiful Navigation Center (shelter) there. We’ve helped 1,200
people out of homelessness since I came into office. We have made progress.”
FROSTY WOOLDRIGE
DOUBLING AMERICA’S POPULATION: A tragedy in
the making!
Do you want your children to face the ominous ecological,
sociological and cultural clashes they will encounter with an added 50 million
legal immigrants? Do you want your kids to face 100 different languages in your
schools? In Denver, my city, we must contend with 173 different languages
in our classrooms. Do you want to pay ever-increasing amounts of your
taxes toward housing, feeding, medicating, educating and caring for 50 million
foreign-born immigrants who lack any qualifications, any cultural affinity,
and/or any educational abilities to contribute to our first world economy and
society?
If you think the future will be pretty for your kids, just look at
what’s happening in Detroit-istan, Minneapolis-istan, Miami-istan, Los Angeles-Mexico
or the murder capital of America—Chicago. If you think the 60,000 plus
homeless living in tent cities in Los Angeles and 11,000 homeless in San
Francisco can’t be solved, how do you think we will solve millions of
immigrants from Africa, Indochina, India, Mexico and heaven knows where else in the world?
HAVE YOU EVER HEARD ANY POL TALK ABOUT AMERICA’S HOMELESS?
Nope! It’s only amnesty, amnesty, amnesty…. keep them coming to keep wages
depressed!
*
The City by the Bay’s
homelessness problem is profound even for California, where as much as 30
percent of the country’s homeless live.
*
*
Illegal aliens continue overwhelming the state, draining
California’s already depleted public services while endangering our lives, the
rule of law, and public safety for all citizens. Arthur Schaper
*
*
The Federation
for American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on
government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid,
and criminal justice system costs. STEVEN BALDWIN
MEX MURDERS MOTHER IN PELOSI, FEINSTEIN, KAMALA
HARRIS, GAVIN NEWSOM'S ! SANCTUARY ! CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO!
*
Steinle’s
murderer, Jose Zarate and been deported 5xs!
*
"While walking with her father on a pier
in San Francisco in 2015, Steinle was shot by the illegal alien. Steinle
pleaded with her father to not let her die, but she soon passed in her father’s
arms."
*
In the last two years, ICE officers made
266,000 arrests of aliens with criminal records, including those charged or
convicted of 100,000 assaults, 30,000 s ex crimes, and 4,000 violent k illings.
Over the years, thousands of Americans have been brutally k illed by those who
illegally entered our country, and thousands more lives will be lost if we
don't act right now.
THIS IS WHAT THE DEMOCRAT PARTY OF CORRUPTION AND OPEN
BORDERS HAS DONE TO ONE CITY!
SANCTUARY CITY
SAN FRANSISCO
AMERICA’S
DUMPSTER CITY OF FILTH AND DRUG DEALERS
HOME TO SENATOR
DIANNE FEINSTEIN, SENATOR KAMALA HARRIS, REP. NANCY PELOSI and GAVEN NEWSOM
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/10/monica-showalter-sanctuary-city-san.html
“It’s almost
impossible to get convicted in this city,” said [Sgt. Kevin] Healy,
who works in the Police Department’s narcotics division. “The message
needs to be sent that it’s not OK to be selling drugs. It’s not allowed
anywhere else. Where else can you walk up to someone you don’t know and
purchase crack and heroin? Is there such a place?”…
Police say drug
dealers from the East Bay ride BART into San Francisco every day to prey
on the addicts slumped on our sidewalks, and yet the city that claims to
so desperately want to help those addicts often looks the other way.
Steinle’s
murderer, Jose Zarate and been deported 5xs!
"While walking with her father on a pier
in San Francisco in 2015, Steinle was shot by the illegal alien. Steinle
pleaded with her father to not let her die, but she soon passed in her father’s
arms."
THE STAGGERING COST OF THE WELFARE STATE MEXICO AND
THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY DEMOCRAT PARTY HAVE BUILT BORDER to OPEN BORDER’
According
to the Federation for American Immigration Reform’s
2017 report, illegal
immigrants, and their children, cost American taxpayers a net $116 billion
annually -- roughly $7,000 per alien annually. While high, this number is not
an outlier: a recent study by the Heritage Foundation found that low-skilled immigrants
(including those here illegally) cost Americans trillions over the course of
their lifetimes, and a study from the National Economics Editorial found that illegal immigration
costs America over $140 billion annually. As it stands, illegal immigrants are
a massive burden on American taxpayers.
HOMELESS IN SANCTUARY
CITY SAN FRANCISCO…
Ever heard pro-amnesty
and wider open border advocates SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN and KAMALA HARRIS, NANCY PELOSI
OR GOV GAVIN NEWSOM TALK ABOUT THE STAGGERING NUMBER OF HOMELESS IN MEXIFORNIA?
The prospect of a 225-bed homeless
shelter on the Embarcadero, one of San Francisco’s most scenic and economically
vital areas, took residents by surprise. Only eight days earlier, the proposal
had been unveiled to turn what is now a parking lot—Seawall Lot 330—into the
largest homeless shelter of its type in the city. Neighbors arrived en masse at
the Port Commission hearing to express their views. It was standing-room only,
with people crowded on floors and in aisles, and spilling out the door.
After a brief
presentation by Jeff Kositsky, executive director of the Department of
Homelessness and Supportive Housing, who touted the merits of the “Navigation
Center”—as the new shelters are called—local homeowners, renters, and workers
were granted two minutes each at the mic. All spoke passionately about
their ties to the neighborhood and how the shelter would erode safety and
quality of life. They worried that it would intensify drug use and other
illegal activity and draw additional homeless people onto their property,
leaving more needles and feces behind. Several described how their toddlers
have already been poked by discarded syringes and had to take HIV tests. A
father explained that his baby stroller was stolen as he was placing her in her
car seat; a senior citizen recounted being chased by “a crazy person.”
Their
testimonies were often agonizing. A few broke down as they pleaded with the
commissioners to reject the proposal. Many emphasized that the waterfront is a
jewel of the city. Placing an enormous homeless shelter in the center of it, in
such close proximity to the prized Ferry Building, is bizarre. The location,
they pointed out, is also a poor choice because few amenities like hospitals or
grocery stores are nearby, and police response time in the area is slow. With
no requirement for shelter residents to be sober, drug dealing, overdoses, and
crime would proliferate.
Port
Commissioners Kimberly Brandon, Willie Adams, and Doreen Woo Ho sat
poker-faced. The Port of San Francisco owns Lot 330, and the proposal depends
on their consent, which seems likely. Mayor London Breed supports the
idea. The site itself was likely chosen for expediency, because the Port
of San Francisco oversees the location, and commissioners are appointed by the
mayor and approved by the Board of Supervisors.
“The
community is feeling blindsided and shortchanged in regard to public process or
a sincere desire for public input,” says Jamie Whitaker, who lives a block away
from the site. “They cast us as millionaires who don’t care about the homeless,
which is completely wrong. We just do not have faith in the city to provide the
right kind of place for them and us. For example, there should be serious talk
of building a mental hospital. It’s clear we have schizophrenic people in this
city and they need help.”
After
community members expressed their objections, a small contingent of
homeless-rights activists spoke, trivializing their neighbors’ concerns as
NIMBYism, and, predictably, accusing them of hating the poor. Most of the
residents, however expressed compassion and praised the nearby Delancey Street Foundation,
a self-supporting residential community for ex-convicts, addicts, and homeless
people, because it provides vocational and social skills training in a drug and
alcohol free setting. It’s a critical difference but the activists are deaf to
nuance and unconcerned about anyone with homes, children, or businesses.
More
crucial, though, is the attitude of city leaders and the media. The San Francisco Chronicle ran an editorial headlined, “San
Francisco Neighbors are Wrong to Fight A New Homeless Facility,” dismissing
the concerns of residents as “the magnetizing fear of a homeless influx,” and
implying that elitism fueled their protest. But the Chronicle also admitted that those living on
the streets are “often struggling with addiction or mental illness.” The
proposed Navigation Centers are neither psychiatric hospitals nor
substance-abuse facilities, both of which the city desperately needs.
Further, the
Navigation Centers have not reduced homelessness. At last count, approximately 7,500 people
were living on the city’s streets on any given night; shelters aren’t making a
dent because so many homeless people are “service-resistant.” No one is
required to go or stay, and many don’t. Tents and illegal activity mushroom
around the shelters, despite so-called good-neighbor policies that are supposed
to maintain a modicum of safety in the surrounding area.
The city,
however, refuses to guarantee that there will be no uptick in crime and
vagrancy. “We feel swindled,” says Wallace Lee, a retiree living in the
area. “Something strange is going on. I used to be a lawyer and how this city
works is confusing even to me. What I do know is that city officials don’t care
about our concerns. I’ve been coordinating people to show up at these meetings.
We will challenge the legislation. I’ve made this my full-time job, I stay up
until midnight. I heard from a lot of people who want to continue to fight and
I’m encouraged.”
And now
Mayor Breed claims that she is “ready
for battle over housing, homeless.” Her attitude is making enemies
of tens of thousands of San Franciscans. An us-versus-them approach is
counterproductive. At worst, she’ll get what she’s preparing for: a war with
the people who care most profoundly about the city. The commission vote is
expected on April 23.
Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Another line
they cut into: Illegals get free public housing as impoverished Americans wait
Want some perspective on why so many blue sanctuary cities have so
many homeless encampments hovering around?
Try the reality that illegal immigrants are routinely given free
public housing by the U.S., based on the fact that they are uneducated,
unskilled, and largely unemployable. Those are the criteria, and now importing poverty has
never been easier. Shockingly, this comes as millions of poor Americans
are out in the cold awaiting that housing that the original law
was intended to help.
Thus, the tent cities, and by coincidence, the worst of these
emerging shantytowns are in blue sanctuary cities loaded with illegal immigrants
- Orange County, San Francisco, San Diego, Seattle, New York...Is there a
connection? At a minimum, it's worth looking at.
The Trump administration's Department of Housing and Urban
Development is finally trying to put a stop to it as 1.5 million illegals
prepare to enter the U.S. this year, and one can only wonder why they didn't do
it yesterday.
The plan would scrap Clinton-era
regulations that allowed illegal immigrants to sign up for assistance without
having to disclose their status.
Under the new Trump rules, not only would the leaseholder using public housing
have to be an eligible U.S. person, but the government would verify all
applicants through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE)
database, a federal system that’s used to weed illegal immigrants out of other
welfare programs.
Those already getting HUD assistance would have to go through a new verification,
though it would be over a period of time and wouldn’t all come at once.
“We’ve got our own people to house and
need to take care of our citizens,” an administration official told The
Washington Times. “Because of past loopholes in HUD guidance, illegal aliens were able to live in free public
housing desperately needed by so many of our own citizens. As illegal aliens
attempt to swarm our borders, we’re sending the message that you can’t live off
of American welfare on the taxpayers’ dime.”
The Times notes that the rules are confusingly contradictary, and
some illegal immigrant families are getting full rides based on just one member
being born in the U.S. The
pregnant caravaner who calculatingly slipped across the U.S. in San Diego late
last year, only to have her baby the next day, now, along with her entire
family, gets that free ride on government housing. Plus lots of cheesy news coverage about how heartwarming it all is.
That's a lot cheaper than any housing she's going to find back in Tegucigalpa.
Migrants would be almost fools not to take the offering.
The problem of course is that Americans who paid into these
programs, and the subset who find themselves in dire circumstances, are in fact
being shut out.
The fill-the-pews Catholic archbishops may love to tout the
virtues of illegal immigrants and wave signs about getting 'justice"
for them, but the hard fact here is that these foreign nationals are
stealing from others as they take this housing benefit under legal
technicalities. That's not a good thing under anyone's theological law. But
hypocrisy is comfortable ground for the entire open borders lobby as they
shamelessly celebrate lawbreaking at the border, leaving the impoverished
of the U.S. out cold.
The Trump administration is trying to have this outrage fixed
by summer. But don't imagine it won't be without the open-borders lawsuits, the
media sob stories, the leftist judges, and the scolding clerics.
No comments:
Post a Comment