WHEN DID
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY DESTROY AMERICA?
The Democrat Party, now the
Globalist La Raza Supremacy Democrat Party, partners with Mexico and the
Mexican drug cartels to destroy the GOP, U.S. borders and the American (Legals)
Born worker.
*
*
"This
is how they will destroy America from within. The leftist
billionaires who orchestrate these plans are wealthy. Those tasked
with representing us in Congress will never be exposed to the
cost of the invasion of millions of migrants. They have nothing
but contempt for those of us who must endure the consequences of
our
communities being intruded upon by gang members, drug dealers and
human
traffickers. These
people have no intention of becoming Americans; like the Democrats
who welcome them, they have contempt for us." PATRICIA
McCARTHY
THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY’S VISION OF AMERICA; 49 MORE MEXIFORNIA WELFARE STATES!
"When we hear stories about the
homelessness in California and elsewhere, why don't we hear how illegal aliens
contribute to the problem? They take jobs and affordable housing,
yet instead of discouraging illegal aliens from breaking the law, politicians
encourage them to come by lavishing free stuff on them with
confiscated dollars from this and future generations." JACK
HELLNER
2020 Democrats Align with Billionaire Koch Brothers on DACA Amnesty
2:50
2020 Democrat presidential primary candidates have aligned themselves with the billionaire GOP mega-donor Koch brothers and their network of organizations in their support for giving amnesty to illegal aliens eligible and enrolled in former President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.
During the second Democrat presidential primary debate, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) attacked the Koch brothers directly, saying, “We restore the power of democracy into the hands of the voters, not into the hands of the Koch brothers.”
Gillibrand, though — and other Democrats running for the presidential nomination — has taken the same stance on amnesty for DACA illegal aliens as the Koch brothers.
For years, the Koch brothers and their network of economic libertarian organizations have lobbied and pushed for giving amnesty to at least 3.5 million DACA-enrolled and eligible illegal aliens. Likewise, Democrat candidates for president have made giving amnesty to DACA illegal aliens their primary focus on the immigration issue.
“I will … reinstate DACA status and DACA protection to those young people,” Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) said about the plan Koch-funded organizations have lobbied Congress to enact. “I will further extend protection for deferral of deportation for their parents and for veterans who … have served our country and fought for our democracy.”
“First, I would fight for comprehensive immigration reform with a pathway to citizenship,” Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) said, also agreeing with the Koch-funded organizations’ position on immigration.
Democrat candidates during the first debate on Wednesday agreed with the Koch brothers’ network of organizations that millions of DACA illegal aliens should receive amnesty and a pathway to obtaining American citizenship.
A DACA amnesty would put more citizen children of illegal aliens — known as “anchor babies” — on federal welfare, as Breitbart News reported, while American taxpayers would be left potentially with a $26 billion bill.
Additionally, about one-in-five DACA illegal aliens, after an amnesty, would end up on food stamps, while at least one-in-seven would go on Medicaid.
Any plan to give amnesty to DACA illegal aliens that does not also include provisions to halve legal immigration levels — the U.S. admits about 1.2 million legal immigrants a year at the expense of America’s working and middle class — would give amnestied illegal aliens the opportunity to bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country.
At the southern border, a DACA amnesty has the potential to trigger a border surge that could triple the number of illegal aliens pouring through the border. Since DACA’s inception, more than 2,100 recipients of the program have been kicked off because they were found to either be criminals or gang members.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
MARK LEVIN:
‘Unbridled Immigration, Legal and Illegal, Is
Taking the Country Down’
*
“Through love of having children we're going to
take over." Augustin Cebada,
Information Minister of Brown Berets, militant para-military soldiers of Aztlan
shouting at U.S. citizens at an Independence Day rally in Los Angeles, 7/4/96
*
This annual
income for an impoverished American family is $10,000 less than the more than
$34,500 in federal funds which are spent on each unaccompanied minor border
crosser.
A study by Tom
Wong of the University of
California at San Diego discovered that more
than 25
percent of DACA-enrolled illegal
aliens in the program have anchor babies.
That
totals about 200,000 anchor babies who
are the children of DACA-enrolled
illegal
aliens. This does not include the anchor
babies of DACA-qualified
illegal aliens. JOHN
BINDER
Every Legal is one paycheck and One
Hundred Illegals away from homelessness….
a rape, murder or molestation!
NANCY PELOSI’S VISION OF AMERICA: 49
MORE MEXIFORNIAS AND A 50 STATE EXPANDED ANCHOR BABY WELFARE STATE
THE DEM CONSPIRACY HITS SAN DIEGO
Let’s briefly review the sordid history of DACA. DACA was a
program concocted by the Obama administration to overcome the failure of
Congress to pass a massive amnesty program known as Comprehensive Immigration
Reform and the follow-up attempt to pass a massive amnesty program known as
“The DREAM Act.” By Michael Cutler
*
*
The
concept behind the DREAM Act and DACA was to exploit the well-known empathy and
compassion Americans have for children. Both of those efforts were sold as
means of helping children who were brought to the United States by their
parents. By Michael Cutler
*
A study by Tom Wong of the University of
California at San Diego discovered that more than 25 percent of DACA-enrolled
illegal aliens in the program have anchor babies. That totals about 200,000
anchor babies who are the children of DACA-enrolled illegal aliens. This does
not include the anchor babies of DACA-qualified illegal aliens. JOHN BINDER
No
Right to College for Illegal Immigrants
https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=5440581937224467578#editor/target=post;postID=1242653707746926792
At a time when Americans believe immigration to be the most important issue facing the nation,
the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has ruled that Georgia’s state
colleges and universities can’t be forced to admit illegal immigrants as
students. And that includes aliens who qualified under the Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program implemented by former president Barack Obama
in 2012.
In an opinion handed down earlier this month,
a three-judge panel upheld the right of the Georgia Board of Regents, which
runs the state-university system, to verify the “lawful presence” of applicants
before granting them admission as students to the “more selective schools in
the University System.” Selective schools are defined as any Georgia college or
university that “did not admit all academically qualified applicants” in the
“two most recent academic years.” That applies to at least three state
colleges, including the Georgia Institute of Technology, one of the best-known
engineering schools in the country.
This policy denies admission to aliens who received “deferred
action” under the 2012 DACA memorandum issued by the Department of Homeland
Security. That memo provided what amounted to a temporary administrative
amnesty to aliens who entered the U.S. illegally before their 16th birthday and
met certain other criteria. The government agreed to defer removing DACA
beneficiaries from the country under the exercise of “prosecutorial
discretion.” But as the court pointed out, the DACA memo specifically stated
that DACA recipients “are not considered lawfully present in the United
States.”
Despite that qualification, in Estrada v. Becker, three DACA recipients who were
denied admission to Georgia colleges filed suit, alleging that the board’s
policy is preempted by federal law and violates their right to “equal
protection” under the 14th Amendment.
Thus, the lawsuit dealt simultaneously with two important
questions: Does DACA actually confer “lawful presence” onto illegal immigrants?
And do states have a legal obligation to any illegal immigrants when it
comes to a college education?
“Lawful presence” is a classification that designates whether a
person who is not a citizen is legally in the United States. It is a status
enjoyed by green-card recipients, visa holders, and others.
The plaintiffs in Estrada v. Becker claimed that DACA provides them with lawful presence, but
the DACA memo explicitly states otherwise. It also says that it “confer[s] no
substantive right, immigration status or pathway to citizenship.”
Under federal immigration law, simply living in the United
States for an extended period does not entitle one to lawfully present status —
a fact usually overlooked by DACA advocates.
Yet the students argued that the board’s policy conflicts with
federal law because it creates a new alien classification. The court disagreed.
It concluded that the board’s policy verifies lawful presence based on
classifications established by Congress and written into federal immigration
law. According to the court, the DACA program grants recipients nothing more
than “a reprieve from potential removal.”
Given that no federal statutory authority exists for classifying
DACA recipients as lawfully present, the plaintiffs also argued that the
constitutional doctrine of preemption (i.e., federal law overrides state law)
prohibits states from regulating a policy area that is within the authority of
the federal government. Under the Constitution, the power to regulate
immigration is exclusively a federal one.
Yet, as noted earlier, the Board’s policy creates no new regulation. It simply uses
existing federal immigration statutes to “verify lawful presence, and it does
not require a state agent to make any independent determination,” according to
the court. DACA confers no residency status onto illegal immigrants and does
not prohibit state entities from using existing federal statutes to shape their
policies. Thus, there is no preemption.
The plaintiffs additionally alleged that their right to equal
protection under the laws is being abridged, since their classification burdens
a fundamental right, the right to an education. But as the court pointed out,
the Georgia “policy deals with postsecondary education, and the Supreme Court
has never said that education is a fundamental right.”
According to the Eleventh Circuit, the plaintiffs “may pursue
postsecondary education outside these three schools, and the Policy in no way
undermines appellants’ deferred action status.” Lawful-presence checks are
rationally related to a government’s interest “in responsibly investing state
resources” in residents who are most likely to remain in the state. Thus,
states have no obligation to admit illegal immigrants — whether they are
DACA-qualified or not — to their university systems.
Outside of Georgia, 18 other states are doing their best to
expressly disobey federal immigration law by providing in-state tuition rates
to illegal aliens who reside in that state. 8 U.S.C. §1623 prohibitsstates from providing in-state tuition rates
or any other post-secondary benefit to an illegal alien if the same benefit is
not available to a citizen of the United States. In other words, states such as
California and Texas that provide in-state tuition rates to illegal aliens
while charging higher tuition rates to out-of-state students who are citizens
are doing so in direct violation of federal law.
Unfortunately, the U.S. Justice Department has never enforced
this provision against any state, to the detriment of the public. These states
are encouraging illegal immigration and forcing
taxpayer parents to subsidize the education of illegal immigrants while
disadvantaging students who are citizens.
That is fundamentally unfair.
Hans A. von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow, and Caleb Morrison
is a member of the Young Leaders Program, at The Heritage Foundation. Mr. von
Spakovsky is the co-author, along with John Fund, of Who’s Counting? How Fraudsters
and Bureaucrats Put Your Vote at Risk and Obama’s Enforcer: Eric Holder’s
Justice Department.
KILLING AMERICA!
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY AND THE WASTELAND OF AMERICAN
CITIES THEY CONTROL AND SURRENDER TO LA RAZA
*
A study by Tom
Wong of the University of California at San Diego discovered that more than 25
percent of DACA-enrolled illegal aliens in the program have anchor babies. That
totals about 200,000 anchor babies who are the children of DACA-enrolled
illegal aliens. This does not include the anchor babies of DACA-qualified
illegal aliens. JOHN BINDER
*
*
“The Democrats had
abandoned their working-class base to chase what they pretended was a racial
group when what they were actually chasing was the momentum of unlimited
migration”. DANIEL GREENFIELD / FRONT PAGE MAGAZINE
*
"It extends to each issue the Democrats embrace. Every city
that has come under Democrat control is proof positive that instead of raising
the standard of living for the occupants, the city falls to crime, gangs, and
drugs. In fact, "America is awash with troubled, dysfunctional
cities that have been electing Democrat Party mayors for decades." EILEEN F TOPLANSKY
OBAMA’S CATCH and RELEASE TO GO VOTE
DEM FOR MORE GRINGO WEFLARE….
Emmanuel Jesus Rangel-Hernandez, 19, was charged in February
with three counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of three
people in Charlotte, N.C, including a 19-year-old former America’s
reported.
(CNSNews.com) --
An illegal alien and known gang member who has been charged with first-degree
murder in North Carolina was granted deferred deportation under President
Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program (DACA), despite
having been placed in removal proceedings for drug charges in 2012, according
to a press release from Senate Judiciary
Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.).
No comments:
Post a Comment