"When we hear stories about the homelessness in California and elsewhere, why don't we hear how illegal aliens contribute to the problem? They take jobs and affordable housing, yet instead of discouraging illegal aliens from breaking the law, politicians encourage them to come by lavishing free stuff on them with confiscated dollars from this and future generations." JACK HELLNER
Census: Texas Adding 9 Hispanics to Population for Every White Resident
2:34
The state of Texas is
adding about nine Hispanic residents to its population for every one white
resident, the United States Census Bureau states.
The Texas
Tribune published the latest Census Bureau data
and projections which indicate that between 2010 and 2018 the Hispanic
population in Texas has grown at nearly four times the rate of the white
resident population and more than three times the rate of the black resident
population.
Today,
the Texas Hispanic population stands at almost 11.4 million. This indicates
that Texas adds nearly 215,000 Hispanic residents every year, while the black
resident population grows by only 60,000 a year and the white resident
population grows by about 54,000, on average, a year.
Last
year, alone, the white resident population of Texas grew by only about 24,000.
(Screenshot
via Texas Tribune)
Hispanics,
the Census data indicates, could become the largest population group in the
state by as early as 2022, outpacing the 11.9 million white residents who
currently live in Texas.
This year, the Census Bureau revealed that legal immigration — where
the U.S. admits about 1.2 million legal immigrants a year, mostly from Central
and Latin America — is driving nearly half of all population growth in the
country.
Since 2011, the level to
which immigration has accounted for overall population growth has increased
more than 13 percent. At the current rate of legal immigration, about 1-in-6 U.S. residents will be
foreign-born by 2060 and about 1-in-10 U.S. voters in the upcoming 2020
election will have been born outside of the country.
In the next two decades,
should the country’s legal immigration policy go unchanged, the U.S. is set to import about 15 million new foreign-born
voters. About eight million of these new foreign-born voters will have arrived
through the process known as “chain migration,” where newly naturalized
citizens are allowed to bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the
country.
Foreign-born voters, as
research by Axios, the New York Times,
University of Maryland, College Park researcher James Gimpel, and Ronald Brownstein has confirmed, are more
likely than native-born Americans to vote for Democrats.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on
Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
Boston
Globe: Mass Immigration Spurs ‘Seismic Demographic Shift’ in Boston
JOHN BINDER
13 May 20191,218
2:53
Mass immigration
to the Greater Boston area has spurred a “seismic demographic shift” over the
last three decades, the Boston Globe writes.
A
report by the Boston Globe titled,
“Immigration has transformed Greater Boston over the last three decades,”
details a new study by researchers from Boston Indicators, the Boston
Foundation, the University of Massachusetts Boston, and the University of
Massachusetts Donahue Institute that reveals how the country’s legal
immigration levels — as more than 1.2 million nationals are brought to the U.S.
every year — are leading to significant changes in the region.
Foreign-born
workers, for example, have made up nearly 80 percent of the increase in the
Massachusetts labor force, underscoring big business’s desire to
increase legal immigration levels to import more workers, more
consumers, and keep U.S. wages low.
Likewise, the study finds that
immigration from around the world is driving more than 90 percent of the new
population growth in the Greater Boston area. Today, nearly three-in-ten, or
almost 30 percent, of Boston’s residents are foreign-born. Throughout the city
of Boston and its surrounding neighborhoods, nearly two-in-ten residents are
foreign-born.
Boston,
the Globe reports,
is forever transforming almost totally due to immigration:
Meanwhile, the
city’s suburbs and outlying enclaves have become even more diverse, with
the nonwhite population outside Boston having increased more than 250 percent
over three decades. [Emphasis added]
…
While foreign-born residents and their families are experiencing
a population boom, the number of whites has sharply declined by nearly 350,000
in Greater Boston since 1990, the researchers said. The
researchers define “Greater Boston” as the five Boston-area counties: Essex,
Middlesex, Suffolk, Norfolk, and Plymouth. [Emphasis added]
Researchers reported that more white people are moving away from
the region than coming in, and that white deaths now outnumber white births. This is
part of a national trend, the report noted. [Emphasis added]
Boston’s
rapidly changing demography from immigration matches national trends that the
Census Bureau most recently revealed. For instance, by 2060, about
one-in-six U.S. residents will be foreign-born, the Census Bureau
predicts if current legal immigration levels remain the same.
The
federal agency also admits that immigration is responsible for at least
half of all U.S. population growth, though some experts say
immigration has become the sole driver of population growth.
Demographic
data from Pew Research Center recently revealed that
Hispanic Americans are set to replace black Americans as the largest minority
voting bloc in the country for the 2020 election, Breitbart News noted.
Similarly, Pew Research now estimates that
about one-in-ten U.S. voters will have been foreign-born in the 2020 election —
a trend that bodes well
for Democrat politicians.
How Many Would Really Come if the Borders Were Open?
Analysis of a recent Gallup poll
By Matthew Sussis on May 8, 2019
A
recent global Gallup poll found
that 158 million adults around the world said they would migrate to the United
States if they could. However, Gallup only polled adults, meaning the actual
total number of people who would come to the United States is much larger
because it would likely include children. Curiously, nowhere in the Gallup
report are child family members mentioned. When one factors in a chain-migration
multiplier, the number of potential migrants is much larger.
There
are obviously a range of variables when it comes to guessing the full impact of
the hypothetical migration of 158 million adults to the United States.
Nonetheless, under different scenarios modeled below, we estimate that anywhere
from 386 to 703 million people around the globe (adults plus children) would
migrate to the United States if they could.
Of
course, as Gallup notes, the number of actual migrants tends to be much smaller
than the number of potential migrants. Still, these eye-opening numbers
highlight the risks of an open-borders scenario, where anyone who'd like to
come to the United States with their family has that option.
Scenario
1: Regional Fertility Rates
In
our first scenario, we consider the fact that Gallup does not clarify which
countries these 158 million adults come from, but it does tell us the total
proportion of adults seeking to move to anywhere — not the United States
specifically — by region. For example, 33 percent of Sub-Saharan African adults
say they would leave Sub-Saharan Africa if they could; 27 percent of Latin
American and Caribbean adults feel the same way.
As
such, certain regions — Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East — are
heavily overrepresented among potential migrants. Currently, most migrants to
the United States come from Latin America and Asia, meaning in a true
"open borders" scenario the migrant flow would shift more toward
Africa and the Middle East where a higher proportion of people want to leave.
Sub-Saharan Africans account for 14 percent of the global population, but 29
percent of total potential migrants.
Table 1.
Potential Migration to the United States
|
||||||||
Region
|
Pct. of Adults Seeking to Move
|
Total Population (millions)
|
Pct. of Global Population
|
Number of Potential Migrants (millions)
|
Pct. of Total Potential Migrants
|
No. of Potential Adult Migrants to U.S. (millions)
|
Fertility (children per woman)
|
Total Potential Immigration Including Children
(millions)*
|
Sub-Saharan Africa
|
33%
|
1,078.0
|
13.9%
|
355.8
|
29.1%
|
46.0
|
4.7
|
154.2
|
Latin America and
Caribbean
|
27%
|
658.3
|
8.5%
|
177.8
|
14.6%
|
23.0
|
2.2
|
48.3
|
Europe (non-European
Union)
|
26%
|
230.5
|
3.0%
|
59.9
|
4.9%
|
7.8
|
1.5
|
13.6
|
Middle East &
North Africa
|
24%
|
418.0
|
5.4%
|
100.3
|
8.2%
|
13.0
|
3.1
|
33.1
|
European Union
|
21%
|
512.6
|
6.6%
|
107.6
|
8.8%
|
13.9
|
1.6
|
25.1
|
Ex-Soviet Commonwealth
|
15%
|
239.8
|
3.1%
|
36.0
|
2.9%
|
4.7
|
1.6
|
8.4
|
Northern America
|
14%
|
366.5
|
4.7%
|
51.3
|
4.2%
|
6.6
|
1.9
|
12.9
|
Wider Oceania
|
9%
|
38.8
|
0.5%
|
3.5
|
0.3%
|
452.1
|
2.4
|
1.0
|
East Asia
|
8%
|
1,658.2
|
21.4%
|
132.7
|
10.9%
|
17.2
|
1.6
|
30.9
|
South Asia
|
8%
|
1,891.0
|
24.5%
|
151.3
|
12.4%
|
19.6
|
2.6
|
45.0
|
Southeast Asia
|
7%
|
641.8
|
8.3%
|
44.9
|
3.7%
|
5.8
|
2.5
|
13.1
|
World
|
16%
|
7,733.7
|
100.0%
|
1,221.1
|
100.0%
|
158.0
|
385.6
|
|
Sources: UN Household Size and Composition
Around the World 2017, Gallup global migration poll, Worldometers global population by
region, 2019, UN World Fertility Patterns, 2015.
* Assumes women represent half of the population. |
||||||||
By
applying those proportions to the 158 million adults who want to move to the
United States, we can estimate the total number of potential migrants by
region. For example, in this scenario we estimate that 23 million of those 158
million people would come from Latin America.
However,
with regard to children, different parts of the world have different family
sizes and different total fertility rates (i.e., the number of children likely
to be born to a woman from that country over the course of her child-bearing
years at current birth rates). Women in Sub-Saharan Africa have an average
fertility rate of 4.7, whereas in East Asia that figure is just 1.6. Scenario 1
uses regional fertility rates to estimate the ratio of children to adults for
each adult migrant coming to the United States.
This
is an imperfect measure because it is likely that fertility rates will decline
once a migrant moves to the United States. Nonetheless, our analysis includes a
mix of potential future parents as well as current parents and the fertility
rate remains a more precise variable than family size, which in many regions
does not easily account for the proportion of dual vs. single parent homes.
Under
this scenario, we estimate that 158 million adults moving to the United States
would bring 227.6 million children with them, for a total migration wave
of 385.6 million people.
Scenario
2: Chain Migration Multiplier
Rather
than attempt to guess what the regional flows of these 158 million adults could
look like, we can also consult existing academic studies for the family
behavior of migrants already in the United States.
According
to the most complete recent studies on chain migration, in recent years each
new immigrant sponsored an average of 3.45 additional immigrants. In the 1980s, that
multiplier was 2.59, or more than 30 percent lower.
In
a hypothetical scenario where 158 million adults move to the United States in a
short period of time, it's quite likely that the multiplier would rise even
more, given that people are more likely to immigrate if they know someone else
who has immigrated, and given that the multiplier has risen over time.
On
the other hand, there is obviously some degree of family overlap among the 158
million adults — such as two brothers who would both come to the United States,
or a husband and a wife.
Given these confounding variables
in both directions, it seems most fair to simply apply the existing 3.45
multiplier to the 158 million people. Doing so would lead to an additional
545.1 million migrants, for a total migration of 703.1 million people.
///
FROSTY WOOLDRIGE
DOUBLING AMERICA’S POPULATION: A tragedy in the making!
Do you want your children to face the ominous ecological,
sociological and cultural clashes they will encounter with an added 50 million
legal immigrants? Do you want your kids to face 100 different languages in your
schools? In Denver, my city, we must contend with 173 different languages
in our classrooms. Do you want to pay ever-increasing amounts of your
taxes toward housing, feeding, medicating, educating and caring for 50 million
foreign-born immigrants who lack any qualifications, any cultural affinity,
and/or any educational abilities to contribute to our first world economy and
society?
If you think the future will be pretty for your kids, just look at
what’s happening in Detroit-istan, Minneapolis-istan, Miami-istan, Los
Angeles-Mexico or the murder capital of America—Chicago. If you think the
60,000 plus homeless living in tent cities in Los Angeles and 11,000 homeless
in San Francisco can’t be solved, how do you think we will solve millions of
immigrants from Africa, Indochina, India, Mexico and heaven knows where else in
the world?
///
DYING AMERICA: Poverty, Open Borders, Widespread
Homelessness, Housing Crisis, Opioids, Corrupt Politicians and Then Suicide!
"In a state like Florida,
where immigrants make up about 25.4 percent of the labor force, American
workers have their weekly wages reduced by perhaps more than 12.5 percent. In
California, where immigrants make up 34 percent of the labor force, American
workers’ weekly wages are reduced by potentially 17 percent." JOHN BINDER
*
*
"In the last decade alone, the U.S. admitted ten
million legal immigrants, forcing American workers to compete against a growing
population of low-wage foreign workers. Meanwhile, if legal immigration
continues, there will be 69
million foreign-born residents living in the U.S. by 2060.
This would represent an unprecedented electoral gain for the Left, as Democrats win about
90 percent of congressional districts where the foreign-born population
exceeds the national average."
///
MEXIFORNIA: The Globalist Democrat
Party’s Vision of America
*
Migrant enclaves already are at the top
of the U.S. lists for bad places to live - 10 of the 50 worst places
in America to live according to this list are
in California, and all of them are famous for their illegal
populations. MONICA SHOWALTER
*
*
California—not
Mississippi, New Mexico, or West Virginia—has the highest poverty rate in the
United States. According to the Census Bureau’s Supplemental Poverty
Measure—which accounts for the cost of housing, food, utilities, and clothing,
and which includes noncash government assistance as a form of income—nearly one
out of four Californians is poor. Kerry Jackson
*
California’s de facto
status as a one-party state lies at the heart of its poverty problem. With a
permanent majority in the state senate and the assembly, a prolonged dominance
in the executive branch, and a weak opposition, California Democrats have long
been free to indulge blue-state ideology while paying little or no political
price. The state’s poverty problem is unlikely to improve while policymakers
remain unwilling to unleash the engines of economic prosperity that drove
California to its golden years. Kerry Jackson
*
As Breitbart
News reported, if chain migration
is not ended — as President Donald Trump has demanded — the U.S. electorate
will forever be changed, with between seven to eight million new foreign-born
individuals being eligible to vote because of chain migration, and overall, an
additional 15 million new foreign-born voters.
*
Missouri Senator Claire McCaskillhas identified California Senator
Kamala Harris as the party leader on issues of immigration and race. Harris
wants a moratorium on construction of
new immigration-detention facilities in favor of the old “catch and release” policy for illegal aliens, and has
urged a shutdown of the government rather than compromise on mass amnesty.
*
No Justice for Taxpaying Americans
By Howie Carr
But the real double standard kicks in when the undocumented Democrat gets to the courtroom. A taxpaying American can only dream of the kid-gloves treatment these Third World fiends get.
By Howie Carr
But the real double standard kicks in when the undocumented Democrat gets to the courtroom. A taxpaying American can only dream of the kid-gloves treatment these Third World fiends get.
*
Illegal
aliens continue overwhelming the state, draining California’s already depleted
public services while endangering our lives, the rule of law, and public safety
for all citizens. Arthur Schaper
The costs of illegal
immigration are being carefully hidden by Democrats. MONICA SHOWALTER
The Federation for American
Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on government
services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid, and
criminal justice system costs. STEVEN
BALDWIN
*
Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan
Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of
all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in
2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that
in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were
illegal aliens.
No comments:
Post a Comment