MEXIFORNIA IN METLDOWN: First, illegal immigration is the problem. CA has spent hundreds of billions on illegal aliens and their bills — public schools, free meals at school, special bi-lingual teachers, healthcare, housing allowances, low income energy assistance, aid to families with dependent children, prisons, cops, courts, public defenders, welfare, food stamps, and a hundred other gov handouts. And don’t forget lower college tuition for illegal immigrants. WAYNE ALLYN ROOT
Tuesday, July 9, 2019
ELIZABETH WARREN VOWS TO MEXICO WIDER OPEN BORDERS AND MORE WELFARE WHEN LA RAZA ELECTS HER PRESIDENT
Warren Doubles Down On Supporting Open Borders
candidate and Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren doubled-down on Monday
regarding her stance that crossing the border illegally should be
decriminalized, reports LifeZette.
When asked if she supports repealing Section 1325 of the
immigration code, Sen. Warren responded, "I am...I think that the whole
notion of criminalizing the approach to coming across the border without
documentation is not making anybody any safer. We just need to be in a
different position on this."
That portion of the immigration code reads:
Section 1325 sets forth criminal offenses
relating to (1) improper entry into the United States by an alien, (2) entry
into marriage for the purpose of evading immigration laws, and (3) establishing
a commercial enterprise for the purpose of evading immigration laws. The
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) amended 8
U.S.C. § 1325 to provide that an alien apprehended while entering or attempting
to enter the United States at a time or place other than as designated by
immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty.
“It’s really important on immigration that we concentrate our
resources on the people who pose threats to us, and that’s not children,” the
potential 2020 Democratic nominee said. “It’s not mamas fleeing terror from
gangs down in Central America. It’s not people trying to build a life who have
Warren's comments come just weeks after she, along with much of the rest of the
Democratic presidential field, expressed support
for open borders. Even Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) has
adopted the position.
said just a few minutes ago that crossing the border illegally should not be a
crime -- "But you just cannot say...that anybody coming across the border is
breaking the law." And the Left keeps saying it's not for open borders?
Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, the twin nutters of Congress, were certain they could
beat Trump at his own game, but have made fools of themselves, as
usual. The stand-off is not over but with each passing day, the
Democrats reveal more of their anti-American, pro-illegal immigration agenda.
Conservatives have been sounding the alarm for years: Democrats do not
care about American citizens!" PATRICIA McCARTHY
In the next two decades, should the country’s
legal immigration policy go unchanged, the U.S. is set to import about
15 million new foreign-born voters. About eight million of these new
foreign-born voters will have arrived through the process known as “chain
migration,” whereby newly naturalized citizens are allowed to bring an
unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country. JOHN BINDER
of flooding the market
with cheap, foreign, white-collar graduates and
blue-collar labor also shifts
enormous wealth from young employees
towards older investors, even as it also widens wealth
gaps, reduces high-tech
investment, increases state and
local tax burdens, and hurts children’s schools and college educations.
It also pushes Americans
away from high-tech careers and sidelines millions of marginalized Americans,
including many who are now struggling with
fentanyl addictions. The labor policy also moves business investment and
wealth from the heartland to the coastal cities, explodes rents
and housing costs, shrivels real estate
values in the Midwest, and rewards investors for creating low-tech, labor-intensive workplaces.
Other than offering
some vague nods to “border security,” Democrats never put forth any policy that
would prevent the hundreds of thousands of unknown people streaming into the
U.S. Yet if you point out that the party doesn't care about securing the
border, a confounded news anchor will insist, “Silly fool! Why, everyone
supports border security!”
It’s a cover-up for
what Democrats truly believe in: An open border that discriminates against no
one from anywhere.
Look at any one of the
Democrats running for the party’s presidential nomination, and you will not
find a single policy proposal that would stop a single illegal entrant. Or even
just the top five of them in the RealClearPolitics national average.
Former Vice President
Joe Biden’s plan on his website: “We have got to
address the root causes of migration that push people to leave behind their
homes and everything they know to undertake a dangerous journey for the chance
at a better life." It says nothing about halting the obscene numbers of
migrants showing up at the border with bogus claims for asylum or the illegal
border crossers with histories of child sex abuse
and violent gang affiliations caught daily. Ah, but it does check the
empty “secure our border and enforce our laws” banality.
Vermont Sen. Bernie
Sanders calls for expanding protections for illegal immigrants already in the
U.S., “developing a humane policy for those seeking asylum," and virtually
eliminating the deportation and detention of illegal aliens altogether.
Sanders’ website doesn’t even bother nodding to the “border security” cliché.
Elizabeth Warren doesn’t mention immigration at all on her website. But in
interviews, she says the same nothing that every Democrat says. “We need an
immigration system that is effective, that focuses on where problems are,” she
said Wednesday on CNN, though Democrats
never seem to find “where the problems are” when talking about the topic. They
deny that even one illegal immigrant might be a rapist or drug dealer, even
though there are scores of them. They deny that there’s a “crisis” at the
border, where five children have died in recent weeks. They deny that illegal
immigrants soak up welfare benefits (even though they do). So where exactly are
the “problems”? Warren said in the interview that “we need immigration laws
that focus on people who pose a real threat,” but how exactly do Democrats
define “real threat”? They apparently see no threat, otherwise they wouldn’t
oppose the construction of a border wall with the fury of a volcano god.
California Sen. Kamala
Harris has compared Immigration and Customs Enforcement to the Ku Klux Klan,
called on Senate Democrats to resist funding any measure or resource on the
border that functions to apprehend and detain illegal border crossers, and made
protections for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients among her top
issues. I think we know where
she stands on “border security.”
South Bend, Ind., Mayor
Pete Buttigieg finally got some policy positions on his website and he proposes
“immigration laws to reflect today’s humanitarian and economic needs” as well
as “reasonable security measures at the border.” Well, I feel better now, how
about you? Last month, Buttigieg said he would be happy to
welcome an infinite number of immigrants, legal or not, to his
city, where he thought they would contribute to the snowplowing and need for
more firefighters. Aw, shucks! Is that what the tiny Guatemalan woman who
arrived at the Texas border with seven children wanted to do all along? Why
didn’t they say so? Hand them each a helmet and hose!
The 2020 Democrats,
with the media’s help, will either avoid the immigration issue as long as
possible, or keep repeating “border security, border security, border security”
in hopes that no one notices what they’re really after: Open borders and
The murder of legal immigrant and Newman
Police Corporal Ronil Singh on Christmas
night by an illegal alien in the sanctuary state of California shows
not only that the claims by Chuck Schumer and the “bride of Chucky”
Nancy Pelosi that
the Democrats support border
security is a deadly and bald-faced lie.
California became a Democratic
stronghold not because Californians became socialists, but because
millions of socialists moved there. Immigration turned
California blue, and immigration is ultimately to blame for California's
high poverty level.
Heights is one of San Francisco’s most expensive neighborhoods. It boasts
dramatic views of the Golden Gate Bridge, the Marin Headlands, and the blue
waters of San Francisco Bay.
founder Larry Ellison is one of its more prominent and distinguished residents,
as is House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.
all its attractiveness as a neighborhood with its boutique shops and upscale
restaurants, Pacific Heights lacks two vital ingredients to make it a truly
great American neighborhood -- economic and cultural diversity.
why President Donald Trump’s plan to resettle “refugees” in sanctuary cities
should be embraced by Pacific Heights’ residents.
inviting the refugees now stranded at the border, Pacific Heights would not
only strengthen the sinew of its community but also contribute to alleviating
the humanitarian crisis at the border.
strength is our diversity, and Pacific Heights lacks that strength. It is
culturally homogenous in a city that is diverse.
San Francisco, earning $117,000 a year or less makes you a
low-income earner. Placing refugees in Pacific Heights
where housing and other costs are truly astronomical would require the
compassion and economic assistance of its residents. The former they have long
signaled, and the latter they are more than able to do.
Pelosi lives in
a walled mansion on a large expanse of land with
majestic views. Her mansion could easily house thirty or forty refugee
families, and she is hardly there. The expansive grounds could house dozens of
refugee families in tents.
refugee children who survived the arduous and life-threatening journey from
Central America playing on Pelosi’s lawn while breathing the clean and
invigorating air from off the San Francisco coastline. Imagine alleviating
the humanitarian crisis by creating additional tent cities in Pacific Heights’
Pelosi, through her holdings in local restaurants
and vineyards, is reputed to be one of the largest
employers of illegal labor in Northern California.
Consequently, the people she would compassionately house might be able to find
work in her network of businesses, especially her fabled
vineyard on the banks of the Napa River.
also owns a second mansion in the Wine Country north of San Francisco. This too
is walled and could hold dozens of refugee families.
Pelosi herself nor the community of Pacific Heights can solve the refugee
problem, but they could set a standard that other wealthy and pro-sanctuary
communities could easily emulate.
a few miles away from Pacific Heights, my liberal acquaintances “Ann” and
“Christopher” live in a complex that is more difficult to enter than the
Central Intelligence Agency. They both support the sanctuary status of San
Francisco and think the border wall, but not their complex’s barrier, is
immoral. Ann is a big DACA supporter although she has been seen adroitly
ignoring and bypassing the homeless that proliferate in her neighborhood and
sleep on her streets. Her compassion obviously has its limits.
complex boasts extensive patios between the stacks of apartments. These could
host a dozen or more tents and port-a-potties that could alleviate the cagelike
situations at the border that they lament as deplorable. Although these
facilities would constitute an eyesore and block the light and view Ann and
Christopher currently enjoy, creating a tent community for refugees would
demonstrate the concern and compassion that people like Ann and Christopher
love to remind the rest of us that they possess.
compassion in Western Civilization derives from the Biblical sense of the term
and means to share in the suffering and emotions of others. When Jesus saw his
friends weeping at the grave of Lazarus, He wept with them and acted.
Compassion means to suffer with and to be motivated to take immediate action to
alleviate the suffering of others.
let the virtue-signaling liberals in sanctuary cities who incessantly lecture
us on their commitment to taking in everyone, liberals who find the rest of us
insensitive and heartless, let them manifest in deed the compassion they so
relentlessly embrace in word. Let them fulfill the Biblical imperative to
suffer with and take immediate action.
they will be rewarded for this in knowing that their upscale white communities
can find new strength in the economic and cultural diversity that the refugees
will provide. I am looking forward to the sprouting of tent cities in Pacific
Heights and elsewhere in the upscale parts of San Francisco. Diversity is truly
a community’s strength.
Abraham H. Miller is an emeritus
professor of political science, University of Cincinnati and a distinguished
fellow with the Hyam Salomon Center
Pelosi - Illegals - Sunkist - Her investments!
Pelosi's corrupt insider
passing of bills that make her rich.
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home House
District includes San Francisco.
Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San
Francisco, Pelosi's home district.
Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a
major contributor to Pelosi.
Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa
employing 75% of the Samoan workforce.
Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 million
dollars of Star-Kist stock.
In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was
increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the
increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make
Del Monte products less expensive than their competition's.
Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed,
Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an
"economic development credit in American Samoa".
Pelosi has called the Bush Administration
Conservative activist Laura Loomer, who is known for going undercover
with James O'Keefe, took alleged illegal aliens from Mexico and Guatemala to
Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home in California. There, the group jumped the fence
and Loomer demanded the group be let into the home. The group set up a pop up
tent with the word "morality" on it and hung the pictures of those
who were killed by illegal aliens, The Daily Caller reported.
When talking about
immigration, Democrats like to conflate illegal and legal immigration, dropping
the word “illegal” and spouting meaningless babble about no human being
illegal. They like to preach that illegal immigrants commit crimes at a
lower rate than American citizens, a factoid that has been exposed as a
The murder of legal immigrant and Newman Police Corporal Ronil Singh on
Christmas night by an illegal alien in the sanctuary state of California shows
not only that the claims by Chuck Schumer and the “bride of Chucky” Nancy
Pelosi that the Democrats support border security is a deadly and bald-faced
highlights the difference between legal and illegal immigrants, between those
who love America and want to be Americans and those who murder them.
Ronil Singh came to the
U.S. from his native Fiji to fulfill a lifelong dream of becoming an officer,
joining a small-town police force in California and working to improve his
English. The day after Christmas, he stopped another immigrant, this one in the
country illegally, who shot and killed the corporal, authorities said Thursday…
"This suspect is in
our country illegally. He doesn't belong here. He is a criminal,"
Stanislaus County Sheriff Adam Christianson, whose agency is leading the
investigation, told reporters.
Newman Police Chief Randy
Richardson fought back tears as he described Singh, a 33-year-old with a
newborn son, as an "American patriot."
"He came to America
with one purpose, and that was to serve this country," Richardson said…
"He was living the
American dream," said Stanislaus County Sheriff's Deputy Royjinder Singh,
who is not related to the slain officer but knew him. "He loved camping,
loved hunting, loved fishing, loved his family."
And now he is dead. The
blood of Kate Steinle, Mollie Tibbetts, and
now Ronil Singh and others is on the hands of open border advocates and the
sanctuary city loons who provide no sanctuary for the American citizen victims
of illegal alien criminals.
Even if it were true that
illegal aliens commit crimes, including murder, at rates lower than American
citizens, that would be irrelevant. The murder rate for illegal aliens should
be zero because none of them should be here and the indisputable fact is that
Jamiel Shaw Jr., Kate Steinle, and Mollie Tibbetts would be alive today if the
illegal aliens who slew them were still staring at the other side of a border
wall liberals refuse to build.
One-third of the world’s
nations have border walls or barriers with their neighbors.
Pelosi believes this is
Tell that to Israel,
Hungary, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, India, Pakistan, Spain, Greece, Cyprus, Ireland,
And Nancy Pelosi has a
wall around the backyard at her home in San Francisco.
What is immoral is a policy endorsed by Pelosi and Schumer of
sanctuary cities and even states that allows such criminal aliens in our
country to murder Americans and a Democratic caucus that would abolish I.C.E.
and those who risk their lives daily to provide some semblance of border
What is immoral is politicians such as Oakland Mayor Libby
Schaaf not only refusing to cooperate with I.C.E. butgiving illegal aliens a heads-up when
I.C.E. raids are imminent.
In the wake of the Singh
murder, Schaaf still insists that warning illegal aliens about I.C.E. raids was
and is the right thing to do, the lives of American citizens she is sworn to
protect be damned:
Oakland Mayor Libby
Schaaf -- who once warned Northern California residents about an impending ICE
raid -- said she has “no regrets” for her actions and said the federal
immigration agency “has gone astray.”
“I have no regrets, none.
The more time goes by, the more certain I feel that I did the right thing in
standing up for our community and pointing out our values are not aligned with
our laws,” Schaff toldBuzzFeed in an interview. “That’s hopefully the
message that is sent out.”
The father of an
8-year-old Guatemalan boy who died in U.S. custody took his son to the border
after hearing rumors that parents and their children would be allowed to
migrate to the United States and escape the poverty in their homeland, the
boy's stepsister told the Associated Press.
Felipe Gomez Alonzo died
Monday at a New Mexico hospital after suffering coughing, vomiting and fever,
authorities said. It was the second such death this month. Another Guatemalan
child, 7-year-old Jakelin Caal, died in U.S. custody on Dec. 8.
The fact is that if we
had a wall, or whatever the hair-splitters want to call it, both these children
would be alive today. And it is American kids are dying too, killed and
murdered by illegal aliens who have no right to be here. Just ask the parents
of Justin Lee, 14, who was killed in a hit-and-run
accident by an illegal alien:
An illegal immigrant has
pleaded guilty to a hit and run that killed a Wixom teen in June.
Miguel Ibarra-Cerda, 22,
entered his plea Thursday, the day his trial was set to begin before Judge
Cheryl Matthews in Oakland County Circuit Court.
Ibarra-Cerda is charged
with failing to stop at the scene of an accident when at fault, resulting in
death, and reckless driving causing death for the collision which killed Justin
Lee, 14. Ibarra-Cerda faces up to 15 years in prison and a $10,000 fine for the
first charge and 15 years in prison and a $2,500-$10,000 fine on the second
charge. Matthews will sentence him Dec. 20.
Police in Connecticut
have arrested an 18-year-old undocumented immigrant from Jamaica on murder
charges related to the shooting death of an innocent 12-year-old boy a week
Bridgeport Police Chief
Armando Perez on Monday announced the charges against Tajay Chambers stemming
from the December 18 death of Clinton Howell outside his family's home on
Chambers has been charged
with murder; murder with special circumstances; use of a firearm during the
commission of a felony; illegal possession of a firearm without a permit; risk
of injury to a child; reckless endangerment, and larceny….
CTpost.com reported, citing
police sources, that earlier that evening, Chambers and his alleged
co-conspirators were driving in a stolen car when they got into an argument
with some people walking along Willow Street, among them Howell’s relative.
The wall would in fact
pay for itself, if only in the reduced cost of crimes that would be eliminated,
saving both dollars from overburdened social services and the cost of illegal
alien crimes, particularly the cost in human lives such as that of Ronil Singh,
who is survived by his wife and young son.
His death, the death of a
legal immigrant pursuing the American dream, and countless other American
citizens, including children, is on the hands of Nancy Pelosi and Chuck
Schumer. Perhaps Pelosi can attend Singh’s funeral and explain how his death
and the deaths of others in the absence of a wall is all President Trump’s
fault and that not building the wall is the moral thing to do.
John Sobieski is a freelance writer whose pieces have appeared inInvestor’s Business Daily, Human
Events, Reason Magazine and the ChicagoSun-Times among
the RISE OF THE LA RAZA MEXICAN FASCIST WELFARE STATE
"The public schools
indoctrinate their young charges to hate this country and the rule of
law. Illegal aliens continue overwhelming the state, draining
California’s already depleted public services while endangering our lives,
the rule of law, and public safety for all citizens."
now overwhelmingly represented by the Democratic Party, have a single overriding
interest: their self-indulgent lifestyle."
many decades, the American Left, the Democratic Party and their mutual
propaganda arm, the self-styled “mainstream media,” have successfully portrayed
conservatives and the Republican Party as a coalition of the wealthy and
intolerant. Further, the Democrats and the left have claimed that they
are the true champions of the working or middle class as they unceasingly fight
to defeat and marginalize this evil menace.
reality, however, is that this cabal has virtually no interest in defending or
aiding the working class as they are, in fact, the party of a bifurcated
constituency: the wealthy and those dependent on the largess of the government.
the fifty wealthiest congressional districts throughout the country, the
Democrats now represent
forty-one. Of the remaining nine
represented by Republicans, three are in Texas, the only red state on the list
of fifty districts. Not coincidentally the residents of these same fifty
districts are supposedly among the most well-educated and sophisticated.
This transformative process is not a recent phenomenon as the trend began
in the 1980’s and accelerated rapidly in the early 2000’s.
elites, now overwhelmingly represented by the Democratic Party, have a single
overriding interest: their self-indulgent lifestyle. This is
manifested in their mistaken belief that conservatives (i.e. the “right”) are
hell bent on enforcing their version of morality on the nation, thus
potentially calling into question the lifestyles of the rich and
veracity of this claim is immaterial as it would require an element of
deliberation not emotion -- a trait in extremely short supply among the
nation’s privileged class, nearly all of whom have difficulty in generating an
original thought due to the ill-education rampant in America’s universities.
Thus, the mindless accusations of racism, misogyny and Fascism directed at the
conservative rubes in middle America are acceptable, and in far too many
instances believed, particularly as many had the temerity to vote for Donald
Trump – who, although wealthy and Ivy League educated, is considered the
ultimate unsophisticated rube.
conservatives are the dominant force in the Republican Party and this nation
cannot function politically with more than two major political parties, the
alternative is the Democratic Party. An entity dominated by the American
Left, an assemblage whose core philosophy is antithetical to the interests of
the wealthy and privileged. Yet, determined to protect their lifestyles
and vilify conservatives, they willingly ally with the left and overwhelmingly
support virtually any Democratic candidate. In the recent 2018 mid-terms,
Democratic House candidates outspent their Republican opponents by a two to one
margin thanks primarily to this wealthy but myopic assemblage.
colleagues in the Democratic Party, and the preponderance of the membership,
are those dependent on the largess of the federal and state governments.
On the other hand, the growing segment of the citizenry who are working and
self-sufficient are increasingly joining those who believe in limited
government in migrating to the Republican Party-- a process that is
accelerating with the policies and tactics of Donald Trump in combating the
entrenched left and their determination to culturally and economically transform
the nation. The Republican Party will inevitably become the party of the
working or middle class. As such, they could potentially dominate the
political agenda for the foreseeable future.
left and the Democratic Party, in order to offset this possibility, must
aggressively seek to increase the number of dependents by promoting the
legalization and ultimate citizenship for untold millions of illegal immigrants
and promising all Americans cradle to grave economic security. In order
to enact this strategy to defeat the Republicans, the left must have the active
participation and financial support of the nation’s wealthy-- which they
Democratic Party has evolved into essentially an incompatible two-tier
class-driven entity encompassing the nation’s wealthiest and the nation’s
poorest. Nonetheless, it is at present a convenient home for the elites
to hold off the imaginary horde of conservatives outside their gilded
the voting numbers within the party are overwhelmingly with those who generally
support the leftist philosophies of redistribution (e.g. socialized medicine
and guaranteed incomes) and curtailing of freedom (e.g. speech, assembly and
religion). While it may not manifest itself to the affluent who have cast
their lot with the Democrats, the redistribution of wealth must, by necessity,
come from the wealthy, as that is where the bulk of the nation’s wealth
resides. It is also this same small-in-numbers group that benefits
the most from freedom of speech and assembly.
fully embroiled in this marriage of convenience, a divorce will be impossible
as the co-inhabitant of the Democratic Party, the dependent class, must
continue grow in order to electorally defeat the Republicans and protect the
left’s agenda. Further, the oversold expectations promulgated by the left
will never be satisfied regardless of how many promises are made or token
redistributive programs are enacted by the current ruling class. Only a
complete transformation of this nation into a failed socialist state will
satiate the left, their acolytes and their attendant army of dependency.
A goal more in reach than ever thanks to the inability of the nation’s elites
to give a damn about the future of the country.
is not a more short-sighted and self-absorbed group of citizens in this nation
than the white, wealthy well-educated urban and suburban voters. They are willing to rend the fabric of this nation in order to protect
their privilege and lifestyle. While the vast majority of Americans will
ultimately pay the price, the current ruling class and their progeny will have
far more to lose.
This figure includes 2.4 million illegal aliens, although a recent
study from Yale University suggests that
the true number of aliens is at least double that. Modifying
the initial figure implies that nearly one in three Californians is an
immigrant. This is not to disparage California's immigrant
population, but it is madness to deny that such a large influx of people has
changed California's society and economy.
immigrants vote Democrat by a ratio higher than 2:1, according to a report
from the Center for
Immigration Studies. In California,
immigration has increased the pool of likely Democrat voters by nearly 5
million people, compared to just 2.4 million additional likely Republican
voters. Not only does this almost guarantee Democratic victories,
but it also shifts California's political midpoint to the left. This
means that to remain competitive in elections, the Republicans must abandon
or soften many conservative positions so as to cater to the center.
California became a
Democratic stronghold not because Californians became socialists,
but because millions of socialists
moved there. Immigration turned California blue,
and immigration is ultimately to blame for California's high poverty
It certainly is a good time to be an illegal alien
in California. Democratic State Sen. Ricardo Lara last week pitched a bill to permit
illegal immigrants to serve on all state and local boards and commissions. This
week, lawmakers unveiled a $1
billion health care plan that would include spending
$250 million to extend health care coverage to all illegal alien adults.
“Currently, undocumented adults are explicitly and
unjustly locked out of healthcare due to their immigration status. In a matter
of weeks, California legislators will have a decisive opportunity to reverse
that cruel and counterproductive fact,” Assemblyman Joaquin Arambula said in
His legislation, Assembly
Bill 2965, would give as many as 114,000 uninsured illegal
aliens access to Medi-Cal programs. A companion bill has been sponsored by
State Sen. Richard Lara.
But that could just be a drop in the bucket. The
Democrats’ plan covers more than 100,000 illegal aliens with annual incomes
bless than $25,000, however an estimated 1.3 million might be eligible based on
In addition, it is estimated that 20 percent of
those living in California illegally are uninsured – the $250 million covers
just 11 percent.
So, will politicians soon be asking California
taxpayers once again to dip into their pockets to pay for the remaining 9
Before they ask for more, Democrats have to win the
approval of Gov. Jerry Brown, who cautioned against spending away the state’s
surplus when he introduced his $190 billion budget proposal in January.
Given Brown’s openness to expanding Medi-Cal
expansions in recent years, not to mention his proclivity for blindly
supporting any measure benefitting lawbreaking immigrants, the latest fiscal
irresponsibility may win approval.
And if he takes a pass, the two
Democrats most likely to succeed Brown – Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom and former Los
Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa – favor excessive
social spending and are actively courting
illegal immigrant support.
COST to AMERICANS of the LA RAZA MEXICAN
OCCUPATION in CALIFORNIA ALONE: $2,370 per legal.
Californians, who have seen their taxes increase while public services
deteriorate, already know the impact that mass illegal immigration is having on
their communities, but even they may be shocked when they learn just how much
of a drain illegal immigration has become." FAIR President Dan Stein.
Californians bear an enormous fiscal burden as a result of an illegal
alien population estimated at almost 3 million residents. The annual
expenditure of state and local tax dollars on services for that population is
$25.3 billion. That total amounts to a yearly burden of about $2,370 for a
household headed by a U.S. citizen.
The Gospel According to Nancy: No
Borders, Kill Babies (UNLESS THEY'RE LA RAZA ANCHOR BABIES!)
Carlson pointed out a few days
ago how the already insufferable leader of the
Congressional Democrats has recently been "ordained….an archbishop in the
church of progressive sanctimony." For a while now, Nancy
Pelosi's been the country's expert on morality (e.g., border wall: immoral;
abortion on demand: moral). She's now taken to telling the country
how much she prays, and she's urging others to do it, too – at least that old
sinner, Donald Trump. After last Thursday's televised squabble in
the Oval Office, Pelosi shared with reporters how she told Trump she was praying for
him and urged the president (whom she also called
while ridiculing his manhood) to accept the Democrats' budget proposal with no
funding for a border wall. "In fact," she said with
stomach-turning piety, "I asked him to pray over it."
a smug person ends an argument by telling you to "pray over it,"
she's really saying, "Ask God. He knows I'm
her and Chuck Schumer's meeting with Trump, she told the media, "I myself
thought we should open the meeting with a prayer, which I did. I told
him about King Solomon, when he was to become king of the Jews, he prayed to
God, he said: 'I need you to give me great understanding and wisdom,
Solomon is Pelosi's favorite Bible character, especially because he proposed
solving a problem by cutting a baby in half.
Sister Nancy's praying for
Trump to keep the government open so federal
employees can finish their Christmas shopping.
an axiom that if a conservative says his faith informs his political decisions,
he'll be condemned for establishing a state religion, while liberals get to
veer back and forth over the church-state centerline as freely as those motorists
who love to text while driving. Right now the liberal media are
applauding the way Pelosi "schooled President
Donald Trump about the Bible," but it's not clear why. It's not
as if they're suddenly in favor of anyone being schooled in the Bible,
especially anyone in a public
never bats an eye without a political motive. This Saint Nancy act
might be her attempt to occupy the spiritual high ground that, obviously,
Donald Trump has shown no interest in occupying himself. Pelosi wouldn't
dare try this with a president like George W. Bush, who, while he didn't boast
about his piety on TV, was recognized as genuine in his Christian faith –
prompting the left's usual reaction: Ross
Douthat wrote in 2006 that "the fear of theocracy
has become a defining panic of the Bush era."
was less of an issue for liberals during the Obama years; he was their messiah,
and they just worshiped him. Meantime, Obama conspicuously dissed
orthodox Christians with everything from calculated snubs and criticism to
gratuitously tormenting the Little
Sisters of the Poor, all the while devotedly celebrating
the unblemished virtues of
Islam. In 2015, Hillary bluntly
stated that "[d]eep-seated ... religious beliefs
... have to be changed" to accommodate the unlimited abortion
license. Then, last year, Democratic National Committee chairman Tom
Perez said it is "not
negotiable" that "[e]very Democrat" support
abortion. Pelosi tried to mitigate Perez's remarks by saying "of course"
there's room for pro-lifers in the Democratic Party, but try to find one who's
not actually voting Perez-style.
year, Pelosi watched the Democrats lurch wildly to the extreme
left. For decades before that, they were trusted allies in the
left's war on conventional morality and religion (except Islam!) for being
repressive, patriarchal, and counterrevolutionary. It may be that,
alarmed that the Democrat brand has become too materialistic, amoral, and
atheist, she thinks she can give it religion. Maybe she can draw an
unfavorable comparison between the reprobate and undisciplined Donald Trump and
herself: the "ardent, practicing Catholic," who exhorts the President
to beg for "the great understanding and wisdom" that she (and Chuck
Schumer?) have already been granted by God. Haven't Republicans
marched under the banner of morality and Christian values long
enough? Now that they've elected the unholy Trump, why can't the
Democrats seize that banner for themselves?
one thing, because no evangelical or conservative Catholic would ever buy
it. Sure, the Democratic Party is crowded with Catholics, but the
serious ones left years ago. The leading unserious Catholic is
Pelosi herself, who professes her devotion to the faith but does it while
living in open, willful defiance of the Church's crystal-clear teaching against
abortion: "It is the
teaching of the Catholic Church from the very beginning
that the killing of an unborn child is always intrinsically evil and can never
her duplicity threatened to become an issue in 2004, Pelosi pretended that,
moved by her "ardent" devotion to the Church, she had been studying
the Church's teaching on the beginning of life "a long time," and she
stated falsely to Tom Brokaw on Meet the Press that the
Church has never
defined it. Asked when human life begins, she
replied, "We don't know," and that "[t]he point is, that it
shouldn't have an impact on the woman's right to choose" – the
"it" being when a human life begins, which shouldn't have an
impact on the decision to get an abortion. Easy mistake to
make when your catechism is Roe v. Wade.
when a reporter mentioned the Gosnell infanticides and challenged her own
support for partial-birth abortion, an agitated Pelosi snarled back that
"[a]s a practicing and respectful Catholic, this is sacred
ground to me when we talk about this[.] ... This
shouldn't have anything to do with politics." But as a
politician, she never stops talking about it, and the sacred ground she was
talking about wasn't human life, but the exercise of a mother's "free
will" to terminate her child. In response, New York's Cardinal
Egan said, "Anyone who dares to
defend that [the unborn] may be legitimately killed
because another human being 'chooses' to do so or for any other equally
ridiculous reason should not be providing leadership in a civilized democracy
worthy of the name." Her own bishop reluctantly corrected her
misstatements in a public
letter, necessitated by "the widespread consternation
among Catholics" of her deliberate distortions of Catholic
doctrine. Pope Benedict counseled her, in person, on
the Church's express teaching, "which enjoins all Catholics, and
especially legislators," to protect "human life at all stages of its
development." Pelosi, " the respectful Catholic" who
presumed to tell Trump to pray for wisdom, emerged from thatmeeting no
wiser for it, obtusely extolling the "Church's leadership in fighting
poverty, hunger and global warming."
warned against hypocrites who make a public display of praying "that they
may be seen by men." The way Pelosi pretends to exemplify
"prayerful" politics, and the way she told Trump "in
private" that she's praying for him – and immediately announced it in a
televised press conference – is pure Pelosi: cynical, addlebrained,
phony. If it might hurt Trump, she'll pontificate how every MS-13
killer retains a "spark of divinity,"
then goes right back to her life's work snuffing out that spark from 60 million
innocents and counting. The Bible never says it's intrinsically evil
to build a wall or protect a border, but it's still got that commandment
the Democrats canonize this Pharisee if they need a patron
saint. Her feast day can fall on January 22.
T.R. Clancy looks at the world from Dearborn,
Michigan. You can email him at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, the twin nutters of Congress, were certain they could
beat Trump at his own game, but have made fools of themselves, as
usual. The stand-off is not over but with each passing day, the
Democrats reveal more of their anti-American, pro-illegal immigration
agenda. Conservatives have been sounding the alarm for
years: Democrats do not care about American citizens!
are an annoying inconvenience, especially those of us who do not buy what they
are selling. We vote against them, which makes them
angry. They lash out at us, call us names, impugn our intelligence
with fervor. All of the late-night comics, the Bill Mahers of the
comedy branch of the entertainment industry, are especially
venal. Jimmy Kimmel has decried those who have contributed to
page to fund the border wall as meth addicts. It was begun by
a Vet, Brad
Kolfage, who lost three limbs and it's raised nearly
appears that Democratic members of Congress are as snowflakey as millennials on
our university campuses. They assume that anyone who opposes their
ridiculous socialist, genderless, climate-alarmist, virtue-signaling
directives is a Neanderthal, unfit to have an opinion. It is then
thoroughly acceptable to malign such people, those of us who oppose every
aspect of their anti-America-as-founded agenda, in any and
every disgusting manner they can devise.
left is all about identity politics. They assign all of us to a
group -- racial, class, and/or all of their fabricated gender
categories. The right is all about individuals, their
character, their talent, their contributions to society. We do
not care about skin color, economic class or sexual orientation. We
do care about good vs. evil, right vs. wrong. This makes us
quite villainous in the eyes of the left for whom everything is relative. For
example, we do not think poverty causes crime, unlearned values of Western
Civilization do. Try to steal an election? It is moral if it takes
out an opponent. We are, it appears, the left vs. the right, very
different on a neurological level.
Schumer and Pelosi have armed guards whenever they are amongst the
public. But they are both fervent in their quest to deny us the right
to bear arms and to prevent a wall on the southern border to protect us from
the flood of lethal drugs that flow into the US. They are impervious
to the crimes of the barbaric gangs like MS13, no matter how many innocent
Americans they kill. They do not give a thought to the many illegals
from terrorist nations that also seek to enter the country on a daily
basis. Schumer, Pelosi and their willing subjects in Congress ignore
completely the horrific hazards that cross the border every day. They
want cheap labor, no matter how many Americans are left jobless, and they want,
more than anything, a dependent underclass whom they mean to give the right to
vote. They already vote anyway, thanks to the Left's rejection of
Common-sense voter ID.
there were a television program based on Schumer and Pelosi, it would have to
be a comedy; the two of them are so inept, so childish. They would
be Dumb and
Dumber redux. Each of them seems to
believe they run the country and can dictate to the president how he will
govern. They demand that Trump abandon the wall. They have no
intention of compromising; they only want to deny Trump and his supporters what
they want -- border security that works. So enraged, so
benighted, by Trump's presidency, they would rather see us overrun by
migrants from third-world nations, like those who have destroyed the UK,
Germany, Sweden, and the rest of Europe, than protect America as a sovereign
"government shutdown" is just a ploy, many times overused by now,
relatively meaningless to the lives of most Americans. The Schumer & Pelosi
show will do everything they can to hype it as a disaster, but we all know it
is nothing of the kind. Trump must hold out for funding of the
there have been some bad actors in our government in the past, Schumer and
Pelosi are the worst of the worst. They are equally arrogant, each
thoroughly ignorant of reality beyond the bubble of wealth and privilege they
inhabit. They both believe themselves to be smarter than the rest of
us, when in fact they are both really dim bulbs, long past their sell-by
date. Yes, Pelosi is good at raising money; how and why is a
mystery. That each of them is repeatedly re-elected does not
say much for their constituents' familiarity with the Constitution, the law,
American history or the facts in their own communities.
Francisco, Pelosi's district is now a hell-hole but for her walled
compound. New York too, like California, is a
state that residents are fleeing as fast as they can. Both
states have been destroyed by moonbatty leftists; high taxes, dumbing down of
education for political purposes, and the sacrifice of common sense to global
warming alarmists. Schumer and Pelosi have for years been on board
with every silly attempt to restructure, to transform, American
society. They both jumped on the Obama bandwagon the moment he was
elected. Along with Obama, they are responsible for incalculable
damage done to this country over the eight years of that
administration. While their constant appearances on television are
so often humorous (Pelosi's silly, practiced hand gestures and
Schumer's relentless badgering of Trump), they are not one bit
funny. They are just loathsome.
The Minuteman Project,
founded by Jim Gilchrist (who is also the co-author of the book Minutemen: The
Battle to Secure America’s Borders), is made up of citizen volunteers who watch
our border with Mexico and report illegal entry to the border patrol. For
performing that thankless task in full compliance with the law, Gilchrist and
his colleagues have been falsely maligned as fascists, racists, and even
murderers. They have been driven off the speaker’s platform at Columbia
University and vilified by Leftist politicians and their handmaidens in the
So it was no surprise
that the mainstream media chose to ignore a recent press release, issued by his
publisher, in which Gilchrist asked the question about Nancy Pelosi’s ethics
that should be on the minds of every law-abiding American – including those
immigrants who are following the law to become citizens here the proper way:
“Do we really need a House Speaker whose every action is calculated to enhance
her own financial interests, instead of focusing on how porous borders will
affect the security of everyday American citizens?”
Gilchrist did not stop
there. He demanded an investigation into Pelosi’s “economic stake in just the
kind of illegal alien exploitation that we deplore in Minutemen.” But you would
never know it from the liberal media, who - while ignoring this demand - have
had no compunctions in calling for Speaker Hastert’s head in the wake of the
Foley page controversy.
Gilchrist was reacting to
my report several weeks ago in FrontPage Magazine that Pelosi – who owns
non-union vineyards in Napa Valley where grape-picking depends chiefly on the
availability of cheap foreign labor – is doing everything she can to help open the
floodgates to more illegal immigration. And she wants the American taxpayers to
pay their way. As even more proof of this than I previously reported, Pelosi
does not want employers like her to be required to pay the cost of illegal
aliens’ hospital care. She voted against a bill that would make employers
liable for the reimbursements if an undocumented employee seeks medical
attention. And she voted in favor of
rewarding illegal aliens from Mexico with Social Security benefits.
At the same time, Pelosi
has led the Democratic opposition to any effective border controls or
documentation requirements. She opposed the Secure Fence Act of 2006, signed
into law by President Bush, and voted against final passage of a border
security and enforcement bill in 2005 which required that all businesses must
use an electronic system to check if all new hires have the legal right to work
in this country. She voted against a bill to bar drivers' licenses for illegal
aliens in 2005. This year she opposed legislation requiring presentation of a
legitimate government-issued photo ID to prove eligibility to vote, claiming
that “there is little evidence anywhere in the country of a significant problem
with non-citizen voters.” She is dead wrong. For example, an accused terrorist
by the name of Nuradin Abdi was just recently reported to have illegally
registered to vote at the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles. Nuradin Abdi was
indicted earlier this year as part of a conspiracy to blow up the Columbus
How many other terrorist
suspects may have slipped through the system because Leftists like Pelosi
oppose any meaningful screens? Instead she continues to advocate our
recognition of the flimsy, non-validated ID card that the Mexican consulates
provide to illegal aliens before they cross over our border, called the
“matricula consular”, which gives them phony documentation to set up bank
accounts, apply for jobs, obtain social benefits, board airplanes, identify
themselves to police, enter buildings that require IDs, obtain drivers’
licenses and then perhaps use those drivers’ licenses to try to illegally
register to vote in our elections.
Pelosi also believes in
giving sanctuary to illegal aliens. She opposed legislation to deny federal
homeland security funding to state and local governments who refuse to share
information they learn about an individual's immigration status with Federal
immigration authorities. Pelosi’s hometown of San Francisco is one of the
sanctuary cities she voted to protect for the benefit of illegal aliens. Pelosi
even voted against strengthening our immigration law with regard to the
deportability of alien terrorists.
Jim Gilchrist cut to the
chase with this devastating observation that the mainstream media does not want
you to read:
"As we’ve shown again
and again in ‘Minutemen,’ the Democrats aren’t just hypocrites, but are working
actively to subvert our legislative system to their own ends. Their only goal
is votes, votes and more votes, no matter where they come from, no matter if
they’re cast legally, no matter whether the person casting them is dead, alive,
a citizen or an illegal alien."
Pelosi sees Jim
Gilchrist’s Minutemen Project as a threat to her pro-illegal alien agenda. More
illegal aliens mean more votes for the Democrats and more grape-pickers for
Napa Valley vineyards like hers. So she even voted against a measure that would
have cut off the use of U.S. taxpayers’ funds to tip off illegal aliens as to
where the Minutemen citizen patrols may be located! She obviously wants to see
the Minutemen put out of business – permanently. She can count on the liberal
press to distort the work of the Minutemen and to keep out of the public eye
Gilchrist’s pointed questions about her motivations for helping illegal aliens
during the run-up to the mid-term elections that may make her the next Speaker
of the House.
Gilchrist, of course, is
accustomed to being vilified and prevented by the Left from getting his message
out. In early October, he was prevented from finishing his speech at the
"Minutemen Forum" sponsored by the Columbia College Republicans. Gilchrist
had spoken for just a few minutes and managed to utter the words “I love the
First Amendment” when a group of radical protestors took the stage and
interrupted him, displaying a big banner saying "There are no
illegals." More protestors then stormed the stage. Chaos erupted and the
audience members who had come to hear Gilchrist speak never got the chance,
which was precisely the protestors’ objective. As reported online by the staff
of Columbia’s undergraduate newspaper, “a mosh pit of triumphal students and community
members danced and chanted outside, "Asian, Black, Brown and White, we
smashed the Minutemen tonight!" They also put out a statement declaring:
“The Minutemen are not a
legitimate voice in the debate on immigration. They are a racist, armed militia
who have declared open hunting season on immigrants, causing countless hate
crimes and over 3000 deaths on the border. Why should exploitative corporations
have free passes between nations, but individual people not? No human being is
illegal.” (Emphasis added)
We have come to the point
in this country where a bunch of radical protestors get to decide who is and
who is not a legitimate voice in the debate on as critical a public policy
issue as immigration. Such Leftists think that migration in a borderless world
is a basic human right. They want no barriers, no guards, and no proof of
lawful residency. They certainly do not want the Minutemen watching the border
and reporting illegal entry to the authorities.
Leftist slogans like “no
human being is illegal” are red herrings. It is not the human being who is
illegal; it is what the human being does that may be illegal. One’s conduct is
the test, not simply who one is. Immigrants who follow our rules are welcome
here. Those who do not abide by our laws have no right to be here. A person who
breaks into your house without your permission does not deserve room, board and
a job as a reward, even if the intruder may be much poorer than you. He has
broken the law and deserves to be punished for what he has done. Our country’s
boundaries and rules for entry and residency similarly define who is permitted
to be here and how we choose to protect ourselves. We are a land of immigrants,
but we are also a land of laws with certain core values. Those seeking to enter
our country and remain here must learn to accommodate to our laws and values,
not the other way around. That is the way prior generations of immigrants did
it, including those who passed through Ellis Island. Why should the law be
thrown aside now?
What we are witnessing is
a frontal challenge to our nation’s sovereignty. Mexico’s Foreign Secretary
wants to drag us before the United Nations for intending to build a fence on
our side of the border with our money to keep out aliens who seek to enter our
country illegally. They will probably get a sympathetic ear as some UN
bureaucrats believe there should be no such thing as “illegal” immigrants in
the first place. For the first time in our history, Americans are being asked
to cede the right to decide how we define ourselves as a nation and protect our
own borders to a globalist governance body. Will Pelosi lead her liberal
loyalists as House Speaker to support the UN against America’s right to control
its own borders? Do we really want to risk finding out?
It is high time, as Jim
Gilchrist demanded in the press release ignored by the mainstream media, that
Pelosi come clean under oath as to her personal stake in the illegal
immigration issue before she can do even more damage as House Speaker.
Sunday bombshell: Pool for
deportation is up to 1 million illegals who have already had due process
"They're ready to just perform their
mission, which is to go and find and detain and then deport the approximately
one million people who have final removal orders," Acting USCIS Director
Ken Cuccinelli said on "Face
on Sunday, referring to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) branch charged with removal operations.
Cuccinelli, an immigration hardliner who
took the helm of the agency last month, said it is within ICE's discretion to
determine who among those with final orders of deportation will be targeted in
operations, suggesting the full pool of approximately one million immigrants
might not face deportation after all.
"They've been all the way through
the due process and have final removal orders. Who among those will be targeted
for this particular effort ... is really just information kept within ICE at
this point," he added. "The pool of those with final removal orders
number one million has tremendous resonance: it is what first comes to mind as
a really big number. It signals "mass deportations" — a bugaboo
for Democrats and advocates of illegal immigration.
Cuccinelli lay out this number serves two functions.
It is a signal to Trump's base that he will deliver on their concerns about
illegal immigration. Many are disappointed that the border wall has not
been completed or even adequately funded. Trump needs them to turn out in
2020. He cannot afford to discourage them.
It is also bait to lure the Democrats into hysteria over "dividing
families" and all the other heartstring-tugging memes they can devise.
Trump wants this reaction because the Democrats, by advocating for people
who have received due process and have flouted court orders, are defending
outright lawlessness. Let them go out on that limb, and Trump will gladly
saw it off during a presidential debate.
that Cuccinelli is a former NeverTrump who has agreed to serve in the Trump
administration. If he handles this well, there may be greater things
ahead for him, as he is a very smart and capable guy. I don't know him
well, but I have spoken to him and regard him as rock-solid, despite his early
reservations about and serious opposition to
Speaking with the White House in the background makes it
unmistakable that he is on board and speaking for the president.
Ilhan Omar: We Should
Debate Whether to Eliminate All Border and Immigration Enforcement Agencies
Healthcare for Illegal Aliens Latest Democrat Effort to Turn U.S. into
5 Jul 201971
Providing free, American taxpayer-funded
healthcare to all illegal aliens is just the latest effort to use mass
immigration to turn the United States into the sanctuary state of California,
Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL) says.
As Breitbart News reported, the majority of
2020 Democrat presidential candidates have endorsed a plan to force taxpayers
to pay for free healthcare for all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens living
across the country. The plan would cost taxpayers at least $660 billion a
Brooks told SiriusXM Patriot’s Breitbart News Tonight that
Democrats’ “primary motivation” behind offering healthcare to illegal aliens is
not compassion, but rather an effort to transform the U.S. into the state of
California through mass illegal and legal immigration.
The motivation for all for this is
even worse. They don’t have compassion for these illegal aliens. That’s not
their primary motivation. Their primary motivation is the desire to
acquire raw political power. That’s what it’s all about. [Emphasis added]
If you limit votes to American
citizens, Democrats do not fair to well with us. So what they’re trying to do
is import people who do not understand the foundational principles that have
combined to make America a great nation and who … are
much more likely to vote Democrat once Democrats give them voting rights.
Brooks detailed how California, the
state where former President Ronald Reagan was governor, has been forever
changed due to the country’s mass illegal and legal immigration policy that
imports about 1.5 million foreign nationals a year.
“Let’s learn from history.
California used to be a purple state. Remember, Ronald Reagan came from there …
the Democrats have flooded California with noncitizens,” Brooks said. “And why
do noncitizens vote Democrat so often? Well, let’s look at illegal aliens. The
data shows that 70 percent of households that have an illegal alien in them are
on welfare. The data shows that 60 percent of households that have a lawful
immigrant in them are on welfare. So, you’ve got three different themes that
the Democrat Party now relies on: One is racism, two is sexism, and three is
“In California, what used to be a
purple state, now out of 53 congressional seats, only seven are Republican … 46
are Democrat and seven are Republican,” Brooks said. “So they have seen how
that strategy of importation of foreign voters has worked in California.
They’re trying to do it in Texas, Nevada, New Mexico, Arizona, in every state
where they can possibly do it. They want to flood the voting booths with people
who are dependent on welfare and who do not understand the principles that have
made us a great nation. That’s how they change the voter pool and they’re doing
Health insurance expert Linda
Blumberg told theNew York Times that any of
the Democrats’ plans that offer free health care to illegal aliens is could
likely to drive a mass migration of foreigners with “serious health problems to
enter the country or remain longer than their visas allow in order to get
Likely U.S. voters, by a majority,
said they oppose being forced to pay for the healthcare of millions of illegal
aliens living in the country, as Breitbart News reported. The latest
Rasmussen Reports poll found that 55 percent of voters said they opposed such a
plan, including 8-in-10 Republican voters, about 6-in-10 swing voters, and 62
percent of middle-class voters.
In the next two decades, should the
country’s legal immigration policy go unchanged, the U.S. is set to import about 15 million new foreign-born voters. About eight
million of these new foreign-born voters will have arrived through the process
known as “chain migration,” whereby newly naturalized citizens are allowed to
bring an unlimited number of foreign relatives to the country.
is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
The Mexican Invasion & Occupation