CAN YOU NAME EVEN ONE DEM POL WHO IS NOT OUT THERE
ENDLESSLY HISPANDERING AND PROMISING THE ILLEGALS ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING?
AND YET NOT ONE WORD ON THE HOUSING AND HOMELESS CRISIS.
WHAT DO YOU THINK WILL HAPPEN WHEN THEY HAND 40 MILLION
ILLEGALS AMNESTY SO THEY CAN LEGALLY BRING UP THE REST OF THEIR FAMILIES???
“Extensive research by economists
like George Borjas and analyst Steven Camarota reveals that the country’s
current mass legal immigration system burdens U.S. taxpayers and America’s
working and middle class while redistributing about $500 billion in wealth
every year to major employers and newly arrived immigrants. Similarly, research
has revealed how Americans’ wages are crushed by the country’s high immigration levels.” JOHN BINDER
"When we hear stories about the homelessness in California and
elsewhere, why don't we hear how illegal aliens contribute to the
problem? They take jobs and affordable housing, yet instead of
discouraging illegal aliens from breaking the law, politicians encourage them
to come by lavishing free stuff on them with confiscated dollars from this
and future generations." JACK HELLNER
This policy of inflating the labor
supply boosts economic growth for investors because
it transfers wages to investors and ensures that employers do not have to
compete for American workers by offering higher wages and better working
conditions.
This policy of flooding the market with cheap,
foreign, white-collar graduates and blue-collar labor also shifts enormous wealth from young employees
towards older investors, even as it also widens wealth gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens,
and hurts children’s schools and college educations.
The cheap-labor economic strategy
also pushes Americans away from high-tech
careers and sidelines millions of marginalized Americans, including many
who are now struggling with fentanyl addictions. The
labor policy also moves business investment and wealth from the heartland to
the coastal cities, explodes rents
and housing costs, shrivels real
estate values in the Midwest, and rewards investors for creating low-tech, labor-intensive workplaces.
JOHN BINDER
This policy of inflating the labor
supply boosts economic growth for investors because
it transfers wages to investors and ensures that employers do not have to
compete for American workers by offering higher wages and better working
conditions.
This policy of flooding the market with cheap,
foreign, white-collar graduates and blue-collar labor also shifts enormous wealth from young employees
towards older investors, even as it also widens wealth gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens,
and hurts children’s schools and college educations.
The cheap-labor economic strategy
also pushes Americans away from high-tech
careers and sidelines millions of marginalized Americans, including many
who are now struggling with fentanyl addictions. The
labor policy also moves business investment and wealth from the heartland to
the coastal cities, explodes rents
and housing costs, shrivels real
estate values in the Midwest, and rewards investors for creating low-tech, labor-intensive workplaces.
JOHN BINDER
America's housing affordability crisis spreads to the heartland
Prashant Gopal,
Reade Pickert and Noah Buhayar
Low mortgage rates and thriving employment should be the
recipe for a strong housing market. Instead, they’re deepening America’s
affordability crisis.
What began on the coasts, in areas like New York and San
Francisco, is now radiating into the nation’s heartland, as well as to cities
from Las Vegas to Charleston, South Carolina. Entry-level buyers are scrambling
to purchase homes that are in short supply, sending values soaring.
Expectations that the Federal Reserve will reduce interest
rates this week will do little to change the sober reality: For many, prices
have risen much faster than incomes, pushing homeownership out of reach for a
new generation of hopeful buyers. That’s cooling the market, with the 2019
spring season shaping up as the slowest for sales in five years, according to
CoreLogic Inc.
“All signs point to a housing market that should be doing
really well and it’s not,” said Danielle Hale, chief economist for Realtor.com.
“The No. 1 constraint, despite low mortgage rates, is that people can’t find
housing that they feel is affordable.”
Many buyers in expensive West Coast cities have already
retreated after a surge in prices squeezed them out. But in other areas, demand
is still robust, fueled by a strong economy and this year’s rapid decline in
borrowing costs. There’s just too little to buy, and too much competition.
Dean Rusch, a 29-year-old chemical-plant worker, has been
trying to buy a starter home for less than $200,000 in Louisville, Kentucky,
since April. On three occasions, houses he planned to tour were snapped up
before he could get there. He was outbid on another. He finally had an
above-asking offer accepted Sunday on a house listed for about $199,000, but
only after his agent locked the door during a showing, keeping another buyer
out. For much of his hunt, it was slim pickings.
“I’ve looked at some crappy ones,” Rusch said. “I used to
be in the fire department, and smelled some crazy stuff. But one smelled so
horrible that it gave me a headache.”
Recent months have shown a growing divergence between the
high and low ends of the U.S. market. Prices in the bottom third jumped about
9% in June from a year earlier, compared with 1.1% growth for the top third,
data from Redfin show. Meanwhile, sales for lower-priced homes plunged almost
20% as buyers struggled to find properties in their range, according to Zillow.
“We have a lot more buyers pre-approved for mortgages than
people closing on homes,” said Jeff Davis, Rusch’s agent. “What that means is
the struggle is not in the financing. The struggle is in the inventory.”
That makes for a particularly bleak outlook for first-time
buyers. The number of new homeowners created in the second quarter was the
lowest since 2006, and just a third as many as a year earlier, the Census
Bureau reported last week. Black homeownership fell to the lowest level since
at least 1970.
Unequal Recovery
The housing recovery that began in 2012 has been unequal
from the start. About 6 million Americans lost homes in last decade’s crash and
needed time to rebuild their credit. Private equity firms such as Blackstone
Group Inc. swept in to buy foreclosed properties at deep discounts and rented
them back to many of those displaced former homeowners.
Now those people are back in the market, along with the
bulging population of millennials eager for their first crack at homeownership.
But many of the properties they want have already been picked over. Builders
have focused on wealthier buyers willing to pay bigger price tags, and now some
areas have too many expensive homes, and not enough where they’re needed.
Affordable homes disappeared first in technology and
financial hubs like Silicon Valley and New York, where buyers with big
paychecks pushed up prices. Now values are flattening after many would-be
homeowners have been forced to the sidelines. In some areas, demand has also
been hit by a pullback in foreign buyers and new federal limits on property-tax
deductions -- as well as fears that a recession may be around the corner.
But even in traditionally affordable parts of the country,
renters worry that if they don’t act, their piece of the American Dream will go
to the higher bidder.
“People do at this point in the cycle start getting a
little panicked that they need to get into the market,” said Jenny Schuetz, a
fellow in the Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institution. And,
with lower mortgage rates, “a lot of people who were on the fence between
renting and owning, may look at owning.”
In Louisville, fewer than one-fifth of listings were
affordable to buyers in the bottom 30% of incomes in April, according to
Realtor.com. That’s down from 23% a year earlier and 38% in 2015. The trends
are similar in other low-cost cities from Grand Rapids, Michigan, to Charleston,
where only 6% of listings meet that affordability threshold.
Clogged Up
Las Vegas, which was hit hard by the last crash and then
sharply rebounded, now is seeing a rapid decline in sales because there’s
little on the low end worth buying. Many single-family houses were purchased by
investors, and now are rentals. The result is there aren’t enough owners of
entry-level homes to move up to the next rung of the ladder, said Thomas
Blanchard, president elect of the Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors.
“Our inventory is clogged up, causing a backup of people
that want to buy,” Blanchard said. “It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy -- nobody
is willing to move anywhere because they’re afraid they won’t find a house to
buy.”
Mike Manesiotis, a 28-year-old who works in software sales
in Charleston, says his friends in Seattle and the Bay Area would say home
prices where he lives are a steal. But the salaries are also much lower, he
said.
Manesiotis wants to live in or near downtown, within a
short walk or Uber ride to bars and restaurants, and pay less than $350,000 --
near the median price for a single-family home in the city. But he hasn’t found
anything he likes. The return of low mortgage rates hasn’t helped.
“It’s not the interest rate; it’s the sheer cost,” he said.
“You’re spending $300,000 on a home that’s 1,000 square feet. You get two
bedrooms, one bath and it needs a lot of work.”
More bad news for renters in SF's already insane market, report says
Anna Marie Erwert
Has San Francisco's rent finally convinced you that renting a one-bedroom alone isn't economically feasible? According to a new report, sharing a two-bedroom might not be cheaper for long.
Overall, San Francisco's rent didn't grow dramatically this
year: In June rents were up 1.2 percent, according to ApartmentList.com. This
is less than the national inflation of 1.6 percent. But what is dramatic is the
steady creeping upward of two-bedroom rents. Apartment List found that over the
past six years, the median rent for a 2-bedroom apartment in San Francisco has
increased by 10.7 percent.
In 2014, the median rent for a two-bedroom in San Francisco
was $2,804 ... Today, median rents in San Francisco stand at $3,100 for a
two-bedroom.
Apartment List isn't the only online rental site to notice
this trend. Rental site Zumper's most recent National Rent Report showed that
"one bedroom rent have another flat month, staying at $3,700. Two
bedrooms, on the other hand, jumped 4.9 percent to settle at $4,720."
Why the disparity?
The disparity in median rent price reports is down to
methodology. Every rental site collects data differently, and their findings
reflect calculations based on their particular methodology. Zumper says it
aggregates data from "over one million active listings [and] includes new
constructions but excludes listings that are no longer available or are
currently occupied."
Apartment List, on the other hand, takes a different
approach. "Data from private listing sites, including our own, tends to
skew toward luxury apartments, which introduces sample bias when estimates are
calculated directly from these listings," says the site's methodology
section. To address this issue, Apartment List uses median rent statistics from
the Census Bureau, then "extrapolate them forward to the current month
using a growth rate calculated from our listing data."
Whichever method we think more accurate, what is not in
dispute is that renting a two-bedroom is getting more expensive in San
Francisco.
And if the past six years are an indicator, it looks poised
to get even more so.
Why? Because, frankly, one bedrooms are already pushing
maximum affordability, while previously two bedrooms were more affordable if
shared. The relatively less expensive unit has the most room to grow in price,
and growing it is.
Moving may not be the answer
Lest you hope that moving south or east of the city will
make life easier, you should know that this June, San Jose is the fourth-most
expensive city for renters looking to share, with two-bedrooms hovering around
$3,000 a month by Zumper's figures and $2,670 by Apartment List's.
Oakland comes in sixth, with two-bedrooms at around $2,800
according to Zumper and $2,200 according to Apartment List.
What can you rent for SF's new median 2-BR rent?
If we average Zumper and ApartmentList data, we come up
with $3,910. That means $46,920 per year on rent alone, sharing a two-bedroom
in San Francisco.
The gallery above shows you what you get for your money, as
well as data used to make these projections.
Overall, it seems if you want to spend less by renting a
two-bedroom, you better do it soon. Renting these units is getting more
expensive by the day.
Anna Marie Erwert writes from both the renter and new buyer
perspective, having (finally) achieved both statuses. She focuses on national
real estate trends, specializing in the San Francisco Bay Area and Pacific
Northwest. Follow Anna on Twitter: @AnnaMarieErwert.
Homeless Surge
Hits Oakland, Silicon Valley, San Francisco Suburbs
JOEL B. POLLAK
San Francisco saw its homeless population rise by 17% in
the last two years, but the rise in many surrounding counties has been worse.
A report Monday by Curbed San Francisco summarizing the
figures noted: “Five out of nine Bay Area Counties—i.e., all of those not
located in the North Bay—saw their homeless counts spike during the same
period, with each other county showing worse homelessness surges than SF.”
As Breitbart News has noted, homelessness has been rising
rapidly in urban areas throughout the state. San Francisco’s rise in
homelessness has been accompanied by a spike in Los Angeles that some say has
brought the city to the brink of an outbreak of deadly disease — perhaps
bubonic plague. San Diego recently suffered an outbreak of hepatitis A among the
homeless, partly due to a plastic bag ban making it harder for homeless people
living on the streets to dispose of excrement.
Now the problem is leaving downtown areas and hitting the
suburbs. Curbed reports:
• San Mateo
County: rise of more than 20% in two years
• Santa Clara
County: rise of more than 31% in two years
• Alameda
County: rise of more than 42.5% in two years
• Contra Costa
County: rise of 42.8% in two years
In addition, the San Francisco Chronicle reported Monday
that homelessness in the City of Oakland alone rose 47% over the past two
years.
The Curbed report adds some “good news”: ‘While the rest of
the Bay Area saw the levees break, homelessness actually declined significantly
all over the North Bay during the same period.”
President Donald Trump has warned that federal intervention
may be necessary to deal with the problem — a suggestion that has met with
protest from the state’s Democratic leaders.
Exclusive–Michael Savage Backs Trump on San Francisco: ‘Junkies Shoot Up in Front of Children’
4:16
4:16
Talk radio legend and New York Times bestselling author Michael Savage is once again sounding the alarm on the deterioration of San Francisco, California, in the wake of President Donald Trump criticizing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) over the conditions in her “failing” district.
On Sunday, President Trump shifted his fierce critiques from Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) over Baltimore to Pelosi, warning San Francisco will soon decline beyond repair unless immediate action is taken. “Speaking of failing badly, has anyone seen what is happening to Nancy Pelosi’s district in San Francisco.” the president wrote on Twitter Sunday. “It is not even recognizable lately. Something must be done before it is too late.”
In a statement to Breitbart News, Savage, a longtime resident of the Bay area, joined President Trump in eviscerating California’s Democrat leadership by highlighting San Francisco’s worsening crime and crumbling infrastructure:
Where has all the Federal and State highway funding gone? The streets are worse than some African nations! Even the roadway going on to the iconic Golden gate bridge is a disgrace! The streets are littered, bums rule the sidewalks. Junkies shoot up in front of children. People are afraid to go out at night. Assaults by bums are swept under the radar by the non-newspaper. Over 30,000 cars are broken into each year! Police do nothing because the psycho-lib ‘judges’ dismiss those few cases that are prosecuted. Need I mention the well-known epidemic of human feces on the sidewalks? Have you ever eaten dinner and seen a filthy human being drop his pants and crap outside the restaurant as you are attempting to eat? Where are Pelosi, Feinstein and the other oh-so compassionate rulers?
The conservative media star’s condemnation of Pelosi comes as Democrats are expressing outrage over President Trump spotlighting the worsening state of long-run Democrat cities. On Saturday, the president blasted Cummings for shouting at Acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan during a recent congressional hearing and said Baltimore, the Maryland Democrat’s district, has “far worse” conditions than immigration detention centers at the U.S.-Mexico border.
“Rep, Elijah Cummings has been a brutal bully, shouting and screaming at the great men & women of Border Patrol about conditions at the Southern Border, when actually his Baltimore district is FAR WORSE and more dangerous. His district is considered the Worst in the USA,” he tweeted. “As proven last week during a Congressional tour, the Border is clean, efficient & well run, just very crowded. Cumming District is a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess. If he spent more time in Baltimore, maybe he could help clean up this very dangerous & filthy place.”
Without skipping a beat, Democrats raced to denounce the president’s comments, calling them racist and bigoted.
“Rep Cummings is a champion in the Congress and the country for civil rights and economic justice, a beloved leader in Baltimore, and deeply valued colleague,” Pelosi replied in a tweet. “We all reject racist attacks against him and support his steadfast leadership.”
President Trump shot back at the criticism, saying his comments directed at Cummings were in no way racist.
“[T]here is nothing wrong with bringing out the very obvious fact that Congressman Elijah Cummings has done a very poor job for his district and the City of Baltimore.” he tweeted. “Just take a look, the facts speak far louder than words!”
The president then said Democrats were playing the race card in an attempt to discredit his argument.
“The Democrats always play the Race Card, when in fact they have done so little for our Nation’s great African American people,” he stated. “The Dems should stop wasting time on the Witch Hunt Hoax and start focusing on our Country!”
Through 2015-2018, Baltimore homicides topped 300 each year and are on track to pass such figure in 2019, making it the fifth consecutive year to occur. As President Trump pointed out, the city does indeed suffer from a rodent problem, which was detailed in the documentary film Rat Film, which aired on PBS in 2018. The Baltimore Sun even published an opinion-editorial in November 2016 — Trump’s right: Declare Baltimore a ‘disaster’ and rebuild it — in which Sean Kennedy, a visiting fellow at the Maryland Public Policy Institute, called for the city to be official label a “disaster” and undergo extensive rebuilding effort.
Aaron Klein, Breitbart News’ Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter, contributed to this report.
On Sunday, President Trump shifted his fierce critiques from Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD) over Baltimore to Pelosi, warning San Francisco will soon decline beyond repair unless immediate action is taken. “Speaking of failing badly, has anyone seen what is happening to Nancy Pelosi’s district in San Francisco.” the president wrote on Twitter Sunday. “It is not even recognizable lately. Something must be done before it is too late.”
In a statement to Breitbart News, Savage, a longtime resident of the Bay area, joined President Trump in eviscerating California’s Democrat leadership by highlighting San Francisco’s worsening crime and crumbling infrastructure:
Where has all the Federal and State highway funding gone? The streets are worse than some African nations! Even the roadway going on to the iconic Golden gate bridge is a disgrace! The streets are littered, bums rule the sidewalks. Junkies shoot up in front of children. People are afraid to go out at night. Assaults by bums are swept under the radar by the non-newspaper. Over 30,000 cars are broken into each year! Police do nothing because the psycho-lib ‘judges’ dismiss those few cases that are prosecuted. Need I mention the well-known epidemic of human feces on the sidewalks? Have you ever eaten dinner and seen a filthy human being drop his pants and crap outside the restaurant as you are attempting to eat? Where are Pelosi, Feinstein and the other oh-so compassionate rulers?
The conservative media star’s condemnation of Pelosi comes as Democrats are expressing outrage over President Trump spotlighting the worsening state of long-run Democrat cities. On Saturday, the president blasted Cummings for shouting at Acting Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kevin McAleenan during a recent congressional hearing and said Baltimore, the Maryland Democrat’s district, has “far worse” conditions than immigration detention centers at the U.S.-Mexico border.
“Rep, Elijah Cummings has been a brutal bully, shouting and screaming at the great men & women of Border Patrol about conditions at the Southern Border, when actually his Baltimore district is FAR WORSE and more dangerous. His district is considered the Worst in the USA,” he tweeted. “As proven last week during a Congressional tour, the Border is clean, efficient & well run, just very crowded. Cumming District is a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess. If he spent more time in Baltimore, maybe he could help clean up this very dangerous & filthy place.”
Without skipping a beat, Democrats raced to denounce the president’s comments, calling them racist and bigoted.
“Rep Cummings is a champion in the Congress and the country for civil rights and economic justice, a beloved leader in Baltimore, and deeply valued colleague,” Pelosi replied in a tweet. “We all reject racist attacks against him and support his steadfast leadership.”
President Trump shot back at the criticism, saying his comments directed at Cummings were in no way racist.
“[T]here is nothing wrong with bringing out the very obvious fact that Congressman Elijah Cummings has done a very poor job for his district and the City of Baltimore.” he tweeted. “Just take a look, the facts speak far louder than words!”
The president then said Democrats were playing the race card in an attempt to discredit his argument.
“The Democrats always play the Race Card, when in fact they have done so little for our Nation’s great African American people,” he stated. “The Dems should stop wasting time on the Witch Hunt Hoax and start focusing on our Country!”
Through 2015-2018, Baltimore homicides topped 300 each year and are on track to pass such figure in 2019, making it the fifth consecutive year to occur. As President Trump pointed out, the city does indeed suffer from a rodent problem, which was detailed in the documentary film Rat Film, which aired on PBS in 2018. The Baltimore Sun even published an opinion-editorial in November 2016 — Trump’s right: Declare Baltimore a ‘disaster’ and rebuild it — in which Sean Kennedy, a visiting fellow at the Maryland Public Policy Institute, called for the city to be official label a “disaster” and undergo extensive rebuilding effort.
Aaron Klein, Breitbart News’ Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter, contributed to this report.
Democrats Promise to Welcome Illegal Migrants ‘Like One of Our Own’
4:13
4:13
Democrats in the July 30 CNN Democrat debate promised to welcome foreign migrants, and none mentioned migrants’ economic damage to blue-collar Americans’ wages and rents.
“Immigrants don’t diminish America, they are America,” said Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who told Fox News in February 2019 that “we need workers” because unemployment was too low for business groups. “We have people all over the country who simply want to work and obey the law,” she said about the nation’s population of illegal immigrants.
“We need to expand legal immigration,” said Sen. Liz Warren. “We need to create a path for citizenship, not just for ‘dreamers’ but for grandmas, and for people who have worked in the farms and students who have overstayed their visas.”
She reaffirmed her promise to end decriminalization of illegal migration: “We cannot make it a crime when someone comes here.”
Migrants are Americans and should not be criminalized, argued Montana Gov. Steve Bullock. “You don’t have to decriminalize everything [but] what you have to do is have a president in there with the judgment and decency to treat someone who comes to the border like one of our own,” he said.
“If [migrants] are seeking asylum, of course, we want to welcome them. We’re a strong enough country to be able to welcome them,” said Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan.
“Americans wants comprehensive immigration reform … [with] protections for ‘Dreamers,’ [and] making sure we have a pathway to citizenship for the undocumented,” claimed Pete Buttigieg, using the establishment’s code phrase for mass amnesty.
Buttigieg also reaffirmed his promise to decriminalize illegal migration, saying: “If fraud is involved, that is suitable for the criminal statute — if not, then it should be handled under civil law.”
His White House would stop “criminally prosecuting families and children for seeking asylum and refuge,” promised Beto O’Rourke. “Asylum” is a legal term, complete with legal tests and deportation rules, but the term “refuge” suggests O’Rourke is making an open-ended promise of welcome.
O’Rourke also promised to decriminalize illegal migration: “I expect people who come here to follow our laws, and we reserve the right to prosecute them if they do not.”
“If a mother and a child walk thousands of miles on a dangerous path, in my view, they are not criminals,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders. “They are people fleeing violence.”
Immigration Numbers:
Each year, roughly four million young Americans join the workforce after graduating from high school or university. This total includes roughly 800,000 Americans who graduate with skilled degrees in business or health care, engineering or science, software or statistics.
But the federal government then imports about 1.1 million legal immigrants and refreshes a resident population of roughly 1.5 million white-collar visa workers — including approximately one million H-1B workers and spouses — plus roughly 500,000 blue-collar visa workers.
The government also prints out more than one million work permits for foreigners, tolerates about eight million illegal workers, and does not punish companies for employing the hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants who sneak across the border or overstay their legal visas each year.
This policy of inflating the labor supply boosts economic growth for investors because it transfers wages to investors and ensures that employers do not have to compete for American workers by offering higher wages and better working conditions.
This policy of flooding the market with cheap, foreign, white-collar graduates and blue-collar labor also shifts enormous wealth from young employees towards older investors, even as it also widens wealth gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, and hurts children’s schools and college educations.
The cheap-labor economic strategy also pushes Americans away from high-tech careers and sidelines millions of marginalized Americans, including many who are now struggling with fentanyl addictions. The labor policy also moves business investment and wealth from the heartland to the coastal cities, explodes rents and housingcosts, shrivels real estate values in the Midwest, and rewards investors for creating low-tech, labor-intensive workplaces.
“Immigrants don’t diminish America, they are America,” said Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, who told Fox News in February 2019 that “we need workers” because unemployment was too low for business groups. “We have people all over the country who simply want to work and obey the law,” she said about the nation’s population of illegal immigrants.
“We need to expand legal immigration,” said Sen. Liz Warren. “We need to create a path for citizenship, not just for ‘dreamers’ but for grandmas, and for people who have worked in the farms and students who have overstayed their visas.”
She reaffirmed her promise to end decriminalization of illegal migration: “We cannot make it a crime when someone comes here.”
Migrants are Americans and should not be criminalized, argued Montana Gov. Steve Bullock. “You don’t have to decriminalize everything [but] what you have to do is have a president in there with the judgment and decency to treat someone who comes to the border like one of our own,” he said.
“If [migrants] are seeking asylum, of course, we want to welcome them. We’re a strong enough country to be able to welcome them,” said Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan.
“Americans wants comprehensive immigration reform … [with] protections for ‘Dreamers,’ [and] making sure we have a pathway to citizenship for the undocumented,” claimed Pete Buttigieg, using the establishment’s code phrase for mass amnesty.
Buttigieg also reaffirmed his promise to decriminalize illegal migration, saying: “If fraud is involved, that is suitable for the criminal statute — if not, then it should be handled under civil law.”
His White House would stop “criminally prosecuting families and children for seeking asylum and refuge,” promised Beto O’Rourke. “Asylum” is a legal term, complete with legal tests and deportation rules, but the term “refuge” suggests O’Rourke is making an open-ended promise of welcome.
O’Rourke also promised to decriminalize illegal migration: “I expect people who come here to follow our laws, and we reserve the right to prosecute them if they do not.”
“If a mother and a child walk thousands of miles on a dangerous path, in my view, they are not criminals,” said Sen. Bernie Sanders. “They are people fleeing violence.”
Immigration Numbers:
Each year, roughly four million young Americans join the workforce after graduating from high school or university. This total includes roughly 800,000 Americans who graduate with skilled degrees in business or health care, engineering or science, software or statistics.
But the federal government then imports about 1.1 million legal immigrants and refreshes a resident population of roughly 1.5 million white-collar visa workers — including approximately one million H-1B workers and spouses — plus roughly 500,000 blue-collar visa workers.
The government also prints out more than one million work permits for foreigners, tolerates about eight million illegal workers, and does not punish companies for employing the hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants who sneak across the border or overstay their legal visas each year.
This policy of inflating the labor supply boosts economic growth for investors because it transfers wages to investors and ensures that employers do not have to compete for American workers by offering higher wages and better working conditions.
This policy of flooding the market with cheap, foreign, white-collar graduates and blue-collar labor also shifts enormous wealth from young employees towards older investors, even as it also widens wealth gaps, reduces high-tech investment, increases state and local tax burdens, and hurts children’s schools and college educations.
The cheap-labor economic strategy also pushes Americans away from high-tech careers and sidelines millions of marginalized Americans, including many who are now struggling with fentanyl addictions. The labor policy also moves business investment and wealth from the heartland to the coastal cities, explodes rents and housingcosts, shrivels real estate values in the Midwest, and rewards investors for creating low-tech, labor-intensive workplaces.
No comments:
Post a Comment