Monday, August 19, 2019

DAN CADMAN - THE LA RAZA CRIME TIDAL WAVE IN AMERICA'S UNDEFENDED BORDERS

MEXICO’S INVASION by invitation!
"The amnesty activist also said that the “border has been a crooked proposition from the beginning, and it will continue to be twisted to meet political ends,” adding that many open-borders activists still insist that “people didn’t cross the border, the border crossed them.”
*
“At some point we will have to accept the fact that the border between Mexico and the United States is nothing more than an invention. It was demarcated in 1848, following a war that cost Mexico about half its territory (it’s no coincidence that cities like Los Angeles, San Antonio and San Francisco have Spanish names),” Ramos said. “Also, it’s been said a thousand times that many people didn’t cross the border, the border crossed them. And the cultural and commercial ties between the two sides remain in place to this day. Look at the fellowship exhibited by cities like El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad Juárez, Mexico even if barbed wire and concrete barriers have been erected in some places along the divide.” LA RAZA SUPREMACIST JORGE RAMOS
*
1. What nation occupied the land for 300 years on which Mexicans now live?
2. What nation purchased 525,000 sq. miles of that land from Mexico for $15 million dollars?
3. What nation has a tougher immigration policy than the one who bought the land?
4. What nation built a wall along its Southern border to keep out illegal aliens?
5. What nation has millions of Mexican and Central American immigrants who came here legally and who don't want any illegal immigrants invading their country, stealing their jobs and bringing gangs, crime, drugs, infectious disease and human trafficking along with them?
6. What nation has millions of legal Latino immigrants who are proud to be citizens of a host country that is a sovereign nation with defined borders and with more individual freedoms and economic opportunities than any place on earth?
7. What people would like to tell the race-baiting, Jose Ramos, "Vete a la mierda!"?
ANSWERS:

1. Spain
2. United States
3. Mexico
4. Mexico
5. United States
6. United States
7. Latino Americans and other Americans who are not liberal Democrats


Holding Aliens Strictly Accountable for the Immigration Consequences of Crimes


FacebookTwitterRedditLinkedInEmailCopy LinkPrint
By Dan Cadman on August 12, 2019
Another appellate court, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, has vitiated conviction of an alien by permitting him to withdraw his guilty plea, as a consequence of not having advised him of the potential immigration deportation consequences of such a plea. The court's findings can be seen here.
The irony is that the presiding judge did, in fact, warn the alien that there might be such consequences, but apparently did not hew to the precise verbiage mandated by the Massachusetts statute that makes this a requirement.
Even in the absence of a specific statute, such warnings have become the court-precedent-mandated law of the land, putting the onus on cops, prosecutors, and judges — and even defense lawyers, lest they later be accused of inadequate counsel — to be sure that each and every alien facing a criminal charge is made aware that conviction carries with it the potential for removal.
This is a puzzle to me. There is no statutory or court-mandated requirement that citizen defendants be told that, should they plead guilty, there is a chance that they will go to jail and be separated from spouses, children, siblings, and parents. That's because it's self-evident. I don't think it's much less so for aliens. To believe otherwise — assuming the alien is of sound mind — is to suppose that he or she lives in a hermetically sealed bubble precluding them from all of the social and sensory input around them that makes clear that there will be consequences. This is a supposition to which I can't readily subscribe, stripping as it does aliens of their social responsibilities to obey the law and ripping apart the causal relationship between misbehavior and consequence.
But the state of the "law" is what it is. For this reason, I have a modest suggestion: Each and every alien seeking admission to the United States should, at the time he or she applies for an immigrant or a nonimmigrant visa, or at the port of entry for visa waiver entrants and parolees, be obliged to sign a short statement of acknowledgement that conviction of criminal statutes may carry with it the consequence of removal from the United States. Maintain those acknowledgements in a database; routinely and periodically make its existence known to police, prosecutors, and the judiciary at every level; and, on request, provide a certified copy of the signed acknowledgement for use in criminal proceedings as evidence of the alien's cognition.
While this procedure of course leaves out the wide universe of aliens who crossed the border illegally and thus have never been admitted, at least some portion of that group could also be provided and obliged to sign an acknowledgement if/when they are apprehended by the Border Patrol or ICE. In that way, if they are later released on bond or their own recognizance, and go on to commit a criminal offense, they cannot claim to be ignorant of the consequences, including the possibility that such a conviction may render them ineligible for asylum or other forms of relief from removal.

No comments: