Elizabeth
Warren Claims Plan to End Corruption in Washington
Justin
Sullivan/Getty Images
16 Sep 2019668
5:37
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) unveiled yet another plan Monday, which
she claims will end corruption in Washington. This comes in the wake of
mounting questions surrounding the lawmaker’s controversial actions in the
past.
Warren
revealed another one of her big plans in a lengthy Medium post on Monday titled , “My Plan
to End Washington Corruption,” teasing it as the “most sweeping set of
anti-corruption reforms since Watergate.”
The
presidential candidate argues that “right-wing politicians have spent a
generation attacking the very idea of government” but concedes that the
government “doesn’t work for most people.” Insurance companies, Warren says,
“put profits ahead of the health and well-being of the American people” and
lobby against Medicare f0r All. Oil companies, Warren continues, deliberately
“conceal” studies on climate change and fund “bought-and-paid-for climate
denial research” while opposing the Green New Deal. She says the same of
pharmaceutical companies, arguing that they want to “squeeze every last penny
out of the people who depend on their prescriptions, while their army of
lobbyists suffocates reform any time there’s a discussion in Congress on drug
pricing.”
She
also places the bulk of the blame on President Trump, calling his
administration “the most corrupt administration of our lifetimes.”
“But
these problems did not start with Donald Trump. They are much bigger than him —
and solving them will require big, structural change to fundamentally transform
our government,” she writes.
Warren’s
lengthy plan to combat corruption in Washington focuses largely on lobbyist
activities and government transparency.
On
lobbying, she pledges to:
Ban “golden parachutes” that provide corporate bonuses to
executives for serving in the federal government.
Restrict the ability of lobbyists to enter government
jobs.
Make it illegal for elected officials and top government
appointees to become lobbyists — ever.
Restrict the ability of companies to buy up former federal
officials to rig the game for themselves.
On
transparency, she pledges to:
Prohibit courts from sealing records involving major
public health and safety issues.
Impose strict transparency standards for federal courts
and remove barriers to accessing electronic judicial records.
Strengthen federal open records laws to close loopholes
and exemptions that hide corporate influence, and increase transparency in
Congress, federal agencies, and nonprofits that aim to influence policy.
She
also promises to open a U.S. Office of Public Integrity and expand the
existing Office of Congressional Ethics.
Warren
plans to reintroduce a
version of her Anti-Corruption and Public Integrity Act as well, Politico reports .
She
is expected to delve deeper into her anti-corruption plan during a speech
Monday evening at New York City’s Washington Square Park.
Tomorrow, September 16th, I’ll be in New
York City to tell the story of how working women organized to change the course
of history after the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire. I hope to see you there:
http:// ewar.ren/warren-nyc #WarrenNYC
Warren,
however, has faced corruption scandals of her own in years – even months –
past. While she has publicly decried corruption in Washington, some say she has
willingly participated in the problem. For instance, Warren advocated for and
accepted money from big defense contractors – particularly Raytheon, which
is based in her home state – in the past. She accepted defense industry money
as recently as 2018.
Still,
Warren’s ties to the defense industry—including another company with facilities
in Massachusetts, General Dynamics—could come up during her presidential
campaign. She reportedly made an effort to reach out to both
companies during her 2012 Senate campaign and time in the Senate, including
facility visits and at least one phone call to Raytheon’s chief executive. She
also accepted more than $80,000 in donations from the defense industry from
2011 to 2018 and in her first year in the Senate fought to stop the
Army from shifting funds away from a General Dynamics-built communications
network that a government watchdog has dinged for cost overruns and performance
deficiencies.
Warren
has also prided herself on funding her presidential campaign without the help
of big, influential donors. However, that is not necessarily true, as Warren is
reportedly using what has been described as a “stockpile” of funds from her
senatorial bid – in which she happily courted big donors, attended fundraisers,
and ultimately accepted their money– to cushion her presidential campaign.
The
Massachusetts senator attended big
fundraising events for her Senate reelection bid in 2018, and while she has
declined big donor involvement in her presidential bid, she reportedly
transferred $10.4 million in “leftover funds from her 2018 Senate campaign to
underwrite her 2020 run.”
Ultimately,
Warren’s $10.4 million cushion gave her more flexibility, allowing her to get
ahead of other candidates, some of whom are still struggling to get their
campaigns off the ground.
Some
of her former donors were quick to call out her hypocrisy, including Gov.
Ed Rendell, who donated $4,000 to Warren in 2018:
Rendell
cohosted a Biden fundraiser earlier this year. To his surprise, the Warren
campaign slammed the event as “a swanky private fund-raiser for wealthy donors”
– despite the fact that Warren benefitted from similar events in the recent
past.
“She
didn’t have any trouble taking our money the year before,” Rendell said,
according to the Times .
“All of a sudden, we were bad guys and power brokers and influence-peddlers. In
2018, we were wonderful.”
Warren
has also faced continuous
criticism for falsely claiming Native American heritage throughout her life and
listing herself as a minority professor for years. A DNA test released last
year revealed that Warren had between 1/64 and 1/1024 Native American
heritage (or 0.1 percent to 1.56 percent) – none of which, if exists, stems from
tribes in the U.S. Warren has denied that she did so to get a leg up in
academia but has refused to go into details on her false claims, telling
potential supporters that she made a “mistake” and apologizing for
“furthering confusion on tribal sovereignty and tribal citizenship and harm
that resulted.”
September 8, 2019
So Hillary Clinton is
the éminence grise behind Elizabeth Warren?
Get a load of how those times have
changed, according to NBC News:
And the pair have been talking a lot,
to the point of Hillary Clinton seemingly backseat-driving the Warren campaign.
According to NBC :
It’s hard to
know exactly how many times they’ve reached out to each other — or precisely
what they’ve discussed — in part because neither camp wants to reveal much of
anything about their interaction and in part because they have each other's
phone numbers, and there are many ways for two high-powered politicians to
communicate that don’t involve their staffs.
One source
was aware of just one additional call between Warren and Clinton since then.
But a person who is close to Clinton said the contact has been substantial
enough to merit attention, describing a conversation between the two as
seemingly recent because it was "front of mind" for her.
Very typical Clintonian - which is to say
behind the scenes and non-transparent.
And while the two share the same
left-wing extremism, and their blonde-white-woman brand of pantsuit suburban
socialism (Hillary was always much farther left than her husband Bill), the
Warren relationship is probably more about exerting political muscle.
Warren may still not be able to stand
Clinton, but Clinton is useful to Warren for rigging the Democratic
nomination.
More
important, an explicit or implicit blessing from Clinton could help Warren if
she finds herself battling for delegates and superdelegates at a contested
Democratic convention next summer.
"Hillary
Clinton would absolutely have influence over a number of delegates to this
convention," said Deb Kozikowski, the vice chair of the Massachusetts
Democratic Party.
So instead of Democratic voters choosing
their candidates freely, quite unlike the 2016 fiasco where Hillary Clinton's
operatives rigged the nomination process against Bernie Sanders, Clinton is
doing the same thing she did in 2016, putting her thumb on the scale of Democratic
party politics, this time for a willing and ambitious Elizabeth Warren, to put
the fix in on delegates. That ought to go over real well for Democratic turnout
once they realize another fix is in.
Meanwhile, Warren is now useful for
Clinton, who still wants to be president, but now can't be. In Warren, she
now has a useful puppet for getting her agenda and surrogates into
the White House. That would not only get her the socialism she craves, it would
also protect her from the long arm of the law.
The personnel issue is interesting
because "the slots" have always been of paramount importance to
Hillary, ever since she fired the White House travel office staff because
"we need the slots."
Back when the pair couldn't stand each
other, Warren was backseat-driving to Clinton's campaign, vetoing Clinton's
"people" in a battle over "slots." Politico reported :
But there’s
tension on the horizon: If Clinton wins, Warren has promised to rattle the
gates of a Clinton White House — as she did to President Barack Obama — pushing
for progressive, anti-Wall Street crusaders to fill posts as top economic
advisers and, most importantly to her of all, Treasury secretary.
Warren and
her staffers have already been feeding to the Clinton campaign lists of
individuals they would consider appropriate for those posts — and signaling in
unsubtle terms those whose appointment they would fight to block.
The reverse could be just as true, with
now Clinton backseat-driving who the appointments would be, who's in, who's
out, as the pair plan a socialist takeover.
None of this is good news for the
Democrats. A jurassic political powermonger, and a far-left fake Indian trying
to come off as having sane ideas, doesn't represent a bright new generation
with fine fresh ideas, just the same old machine politics, rendered worse by
extremism.
If the Democratic emails get hacked again
this year, oh, what a story those emails of this alliance of two
leftists who secretly loathe each other might just tell.
They Destroyed Our Country
“They knew Obama was an unqualified crook; yet they
promoted him. They knew Obama was a train wreck waiting to happen; yet they
made him president, to the great injury of America and the world. They understood
he was only a figurehead, an egomaniac, and a liar; yet they made him king,
doing great harm to our republic (perhaps irreparable.)”
Corruption
blinders of the media and other Democrats
Most journalists
and Democrats didn’t express any concerns when:
VP Biden
threatened (promised) Ukraine that he would cut off a billion dollars in
aid to them if they didn't fire the prosecutor investigating a company his
son was involved with.
Hunter
Biden got paid $50,000 a month as a board member of a corrupt Ukrainian
gas company when he had no expertise on the product of the company.
Obama
promised the very dangerous Russia and Putin that he would be flexible if
he was reelected (somehow no one at FBI or elsewhere was ever concerned
that Russia may have tried to influence the 2012 election to elect the
flexible president.)
Hillary,
Obama and many others violated the nation's security laws by using her
non-government computer.
Obama
gave kickbacks to union supporters when he violated the nation's
bankruptcy law with the bailout of GM.
Obama
used taxpayer dollars to reward political supporters like at Solyndra.
Hillary,
through her family and foundation, got huge amounts of speech money and
donations from foreign countries. Russia, for example, got Uranium for
their generosity. (If there is any doubt about whether they were
kickbacks, that should have disappeared when the donations dried up and
speech fees dropped or dried up when she no longer could return favors)
Obama
shipped over $1 billion in taxpayer money in unmarked bills, to Iran
tyrants, who still pledge death to America, to get a deal.
Obama
dictatorially stopped a years’ long investigation into a billion dollar a year
drug running ring by terrorists to appease Iranian tyrants because he was
more concerned about his legacy than the safety, health and lives of the
American people.
Hillary
and the DNC paying over $10 billion to buy a fake dossier from a foreign
national to destroy Trump. It appears they didn't think they could beat
him based on the truth or their policy proposals.
Obama
and his administration, including the FBI, Justice Department, the
intelligence agencies and the State Department, using the fake dossier as
a source for FISA warrants and to infiltrate the Trump campaign with
informants. (they obviously didn't believe their record or policies would
win the votes). Instead of the media and other Democrats caring about this
pure corruption they have participated in perpetuating the lies about
Russian collusion for over three years.
The
Obama Administration, at the Justice Department, EPA and CFPB using
taxpayer money for political purposes and political supporters by creating
slush funds from money confiscated from businesses that they pretended
would go to victims.
If the media and Democrats want to investigate anything, how
about a possible corrupt payback from Netflix to Obama? Obama gave the very
wealthy Netlfix, Google and others huge financial benefits with net neutrality
and Netflix gave the Obama's a huge contract even though they had no video
production expertise or experience. It is similar to paying Biden's son huge
amounts of money with no expertise.
But now when President Trump may have said something to a
foreign leader about investigating corruption by Biden's son, that is supposed
to be an impeachable offense. Shouldn't a President want political corruption
by politicians to be investigated? Shouldn't the media and other Democrats be
more concerned about the corruption itself than the phone call?
From this story, it appears that the media and other
Democrats believe that every phone call that Trump makes to a foreign leader
should become public knowledge if any bureaucrat makes a whistle blower report
when they disagree with something the president does. That would certainly be
cumbersome, and foreign leaders would no longer want to have discussions if
every discussion could be made public.
Elizabeth Warren says she wants to get rid of corruption but
not once have I heard her complain about the massive corruption during the
Obama years or at her precious CFPB, so she really doesn't care.
Isn't it odd that no bureaucrats seemed to care about the
corruption of Obama/Biden? It shows why we need to drain the swamp.
GRIFTER AND PHONY CHARITY FOUNDATION
FRAUDSTER HILLARY CLINTON’S LONG SERVICE TO AMERICA’S MOST EVIL BANKSTERS
The judge found these
releases, together with the publication of Clinton’s secret speeches to Wall
Street banks, in which she pledged to be their representative, were “matters of
the highest public concern.” They “allowed the American electorate to look
behind the curtain of one of the two major political parties in the United
States during a presidential election.”
*
“Clinton also
failed to mention how he and Hillary cashed in after his
presidential tenure to make themselves multimillionaires, in
part by taking tens of millions in speaking fees from Wall Street
bankers.”
///
VIDEO:
THE FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY FROM THE FIRST DAY!
Is it a signal
that she's back in the game because she's selling her president-ability to the
world's global billionaire crowd and laying the groundwork for more
funds? There are all kinds of ways for foreign billionaires to get
money to the U.S. without consequences, after all. What's more, it's
pretty much the biggest base of support she has, which is at least one reason
why she lost the 2016 election.
*
“The couple
parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the
top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
*
The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid
speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign
contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton
Foundation.”
*
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to
every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
///
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S
BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as Hillary
Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.
1.
Globalism: Google
VP Kent Walker insists that despite its repeated rejection by electorates
around the world, “globalization” is an “incredible force for good.”
2.
Hillary Clinton’s Democratic
party: An executive nearly broke down crying because of the candidate’s loss. Not
a single executive expressed anything but dismay at her defeat.
3. Immigration: Maintaining
liberal immigration in the U.S is the policy that Google’s executives discussed the
most.
Democrats as a protection
racket? Ed Buck makes it a trifecta
The New York Times has been trying to
dismiss the arrest of Ed Buck, a Democratic fatcat who had a thing
for injecting young black men with drugs before paying them for sex, as a
"small-time Democratic donor," but the facts on the ground suggest he
was a rather big one. And maybe that's a function of the paper's desire to
protect its masters, the Democrats. They aren't known as Democratic operatives with
bylines for nothing.
While Buck once identified himself as a conservative Republican,
according to the Los Angeles Times, he became a national figure when he
spearheaded the effort to impeach Arizona’s Republican Gov. Evan Mecham in the
1980s. He later made large donations to Democrats, including more than $500,000
since 2007, according to court documents filed by Moore's mother in a wrongful
death suit pertaining to her son.
At the
federal level, those include contributions to prominent Washington lawmakers as
well as 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. At the local
level, Buck has donated more than $51,000 to Los Angeles city and county
officials ,
candidates, and affiliated parties dating to 2008.
The highest
contribution was $13,000, according to the court papers, to former West
Hollywood Mayor John Duran when he ran for county supervisor in 2014.
That doesn't sound too small-time to me.
And in fact, his ideological
switcheroo sounds as though he found the Democrats a more suitable protection
racket for his perversions than the Republicans. Who needs political beliefs
when the real belief is perversion and that's what he needs protected?
It's actually part of the pattern
with these scandals. Pervert with big vices donates cash to Democrats to ensure
his protection from the cops. Harvey Weinstein knew it, that was what his
Planned Parenthood and other woke cause donations bought for him - a capacity
to prey on young actresses trying to win roles. Jeffrey Epstein knew it too,
donating to leftist Bill Clinton causes in order to buy enough influence to
enable him to prey on underage girls with impunity, spiriting them to his
pervert island for himself along with his highly connected Democrat
buddies. Both had added payoffs in that Weinstein then had the power to
threaten actresses and reporters who threatened to tell on him, while
Epstein had blackmail material on very powerful people which kept them on
his string.
Now we have the sorry case of Ed Buck, a
creep who enjoyed paying for sex with young black men while poisoning them
with drugs, and then relying on his political donations to ensure the cops
looked the other way. Note that quite a few of his donations were to Los
Angeles local officials, all of them Democrats. Assuming this tweet's images
are not manipulated, look at the range of Buck's Democrats :
Combine it with media malfeasance - the
mainstream media tried to turn down Ronan Farrow's report on Weinstein, it
tried to pin the Epstein scandal on President Trump, and now it's trying to
persuade us that Buck was just small fry, and the protection racket
seems complete.
With so many of these perverts turning up
in the Democrat donor base as well as organizations such as Planned Parenthood,
one wonders if these are the only ones out there. Is the Democratic Party held
together in no small part by freaks using politics as their 'vaccination'
from scrutiny? Are their perversions and the need to protect them at the root
of why these groups are so powerful and Democrats are so extreme and inflexible
on issues such as abortion? Might that be why they're so out of step with even
the Democratic voting public? And why are the Democrats the more hospitable
party for such a sorry scenario? Why are they the party of perverts ? It actually isn't just these three, it's quite a few of
them as I noted here . A lot of such characters have turned up in a very, very
short time and the pattern is exactly the same for each. How many more are
there? What does Ted Lieu, Adam Schiff, Hillary Clinton and other Democrats
who've benefited from Buck's bucks have to say about this? And why aren't
all of the Democrats confronting this?
SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN: I got rich, really, rich, selling out
my country as my husband/pimp paid out bribes to other DEM POLS so they would
keep their mouths closed about our corruption!
*
IN THE November 2006 election, the voters demanded congressional
ethics reform. And so, the newly appointed chairman of the Senate Rules
Committee, Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., is now duly in charge of regulating the
ethical behavior of her colleagues. But for many years, Feinstein has been
beset by her own ethical conflict of interest, say congressional ethics
experts.
*
“All
in all, it was an incredible victory for the Chinese government. Feinstein has
done more for Red China than other any serving U.S. politician. “ Trevor Loudon
*
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and
Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with
third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by
its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan AMERICAN THINKER.com
Judicial Watch: Only Crimes in Russia Scandal Are from ‘Obama
Gang’
FOR EIGHT YEARS BARACK OBAMA AND ERIC HOLDER SABOTAGED HOMELAND
SECURITY TO EASE MORE MEXICANS OVER OUR BORDERS AND INTO OUR JOBS AND VOTING
BOOTHS.
OBAMA NEEDED THESE ILLEGALS TO FINISH OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS, WHAT WAS
LEFT OF THEM AFTER OBAMA'S CRONY BANKSTERS' PLUNDER.
“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered
documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with
the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the
American dole.” Washington Times
THE
MAN WHO WOULD BE DICTATOR
Barack
Obama’s Russia Connection
If
Obama was a fully recruited agent of Moscow, tasked with giving Russia a
significant military advantage over the United States, and economically
weakening and socially dividing the nation, how would he have conducted his
presidency (or his post-presidency) any differently? TREVOR LOUDON
*
We are all victims of the Obama cabal’s collusion with Russia –
President Trump’s voters and all Americans who believe in our free and fair
election process.
///
Democrats Allow Communists to Infiltrate Their Party
Across the Nation
“Obama’s new home in Washington has been described
as the “nerve center” of the anti-Trump opposition. Former attorney
general Eric Holder has said that Obama is “ready to roll” and has
aligned himself with the “resistance.” Former high-level Obama campaign
staffers now work with a variety of groups organizing direct action
against Trump’s initiatives. “Resistance School,” for
example, features lectures by former campaign executive
Sara El-Amine, author of the Obama Organizing.”
*
“Professor Paul Kengor has extensively researched the
Chicago communists whose progeny include David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, and
Barack Hussein Obama. Add the openly Marxist, pro-communist Ayers, and
you have many of the key players who put Obama into power.”
*
We
are all victims of the Obama cabal’s collusion with Russia – President Trump’s
voters and all Americans who believe in our free and fair election process.
DESTABILIZE AMERICA TO LAY GROUNDS FOR A MUSLIM-STYLE DICTATORSHIP
*
“Obama’s new home in Washington has
been described as the “nerve center” of the anti-Trump opposition.
Former attorney general Eric Holder has said that Obama is “ready to roll”
and has aligned himself with the “resistance.” Former
high-level Obama campaign staffers now work with a variety of groups
organizing direct action against Trump’s initiatives. “Resistance School,”
for example, features lectures by former campaign executive
Sara El-Amine, author of the Obama Organizing.”
BARACK OBAMA:
Was he America’s first closet Communist president?
Obama choose Communists and Marxists for the highest,
most powerful positions in our land, including his closest political advisors,
and his head of the CIA. These facts are not in dispute. Most are
openly admitted by the people in question, as necessary damage control.
Our press chooses not to report them.
*
Professor Paul
Kengor has extensively researched the Chicago communists whose progeny include
David Axelrod, Valerie Jarrett, and Barack Hussein Obama. Add the openly
Marxist, pro-communist Ayers, and you have many of the key players who put
Obama into power.
WAS THE RUSSIAN
HOAX ONLY OBAMA’S ATTEMPT TO PUT ASIDE TRUMP FOR AN OBAMA THIRD TERM FOR
LIFE???
*
*
They Destroyed Our Country
“They knew Obama was an unqualified crook; yet they
promoted him. They knew Obama was a train wreck waiting to happen; yet they
made him president, to the great injury of America and the world. They
understood he was only a figurehead, an egomaniac, and a liar; yet they made
him king, doing great harm to our republic (perhaps irreparable.)”
*
These people were engaged in a massive political conspiracy. The
Democrats made a decision from the outset—beginning with the election campaign
of the favored candidate of Wall Street and the CIA, Hillary Clinton—that they
would not oppose Trump on his anti-working-class social policy or his
authoritarian hostility to democratic rights and promotion of anti-immigrant
racism, but on issues of imperialist foreign policy.
*
“Obama’s
new home in Washington has been described as the “nerve center” of the
anti-Trump opposition. Former attorney general Eric Holder has said
that Obama is “ready to roll” and has aligned himself with the
“resistance.” Former high-level Obama campaign staffers now work with a
variety of groups organizing direct action against
Trump’s initiatives. “Resistance School,” for example, features
lectures by former campaign executive Sara El-Amine, author of the Obama Organizing.”
Barack Obama’s plot for a third term for life
A Muslim dictatorship like his crony paymasters, the 9-11
invading Saudis who have financed him for decades.
“Obama has the totalitarian impulse.
After all, he went around saying he didn't have Constitutional authority to
legalize the illegals, and then he tried anyway. The courts stopped him.”
*
What was Obama’s motive? Simple, he knew if he did that
for Hillary, he’d own the next President of the United States, and could
blackmail her with the truth till the end of time. It literally would have
given him a 3rd and 4th term.
THE OBAMA – CLINTON RUSSIAN CONNECTION
*
WITH THESE
TRAITORS, JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY!
*
How President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton aided
Russia’s quest for global nuclear dominance.
No comments:
Post a Comment