KNOW OF EVEN ONE BILLIONAIRE WHO IS NOT FOR WIDER OPEN BORDERS, AMNESTY, NO E-VERIFY, AND NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!
Globalism and the Hoodwinking of the American Elite
Every society has always been controlled by a small portion of the population. These leaders of society have been called by many names; today, they are often called the elite. In modern free societies like the United States, there is more economic mobility so that some of the elite are individuals who were born in poverty, but there is still an elite even in societies that are founded on equality. There is still a small portion of society who have much greater influence than everyone else.
Historically, the elite in every nation have aligned themselves with the common people in their own nation. In the past, the most wealthy and influential people were among the first to enlist in time of war. The elite in each nation aligned themselves with the common people in their own nation and against the elite in other nations.
Today, there is globalism. This is the "new world order." The elite of today believe that it is in their best interest and everybody's best interest if they can end nationalism and come together as one big global family. This coming together has not been a global coming together of all people; it has been a coming together of only the elite in many different nations, and they have been joined by a shrinking portion of the common people who are still under their influence.
The elite of the U.S. and Europe have aligned themselves not only with each other, but also with the elite of China and the Middle East. They have intertwined the world economy to such a degree that decoupling seems impossible. They are promoting open borders. Since they believe that humanity is becoming one big happy family, it makes sense that they have never noticed any potential problem with the move of manufacturing to China. They facilitated this move. The working people in the West have been devastated by the loss of manufacturing jobs, and they are increasingly turning against the elite.
With globalism, the elite no longer see the elite of other nations as their enemy, but instead they see the common people of their own society as their enemy. The elite of many different nations are aligned against the working class of those same nations. The elite see themselves as morally superior, as they believe they are bringing about world unity and peace, and they see the common people of their own society as selfish simpletons for opposing them.
The elite don't seem to realize that globalism is almost exclusively a Western movement. The Chinese and the Muslims are not actually singing "kumbaya," but are only moving their lips.
China is like one big slave plantation, and the Chinese government has used its control over its own economy and the manipulation of the currency to take control of world industrial production. This has made China the world's greatest industrial and economic power, but it's an economic power with an enslaved working class who are able to consume only a portion of the goods they produce. The surplus Chinese production must be sold to the working class of America, who have been decimated by the loss of manufacturing jobs. This has created an unsustainable world economy.
We have transformed China from a Marxist totalitarian regime to a fascist totalitarian regime, and a fascist regime that is solidly nationalist. The U.S. should have stood up to China years ago. It's too late now. China controls industrial production, and the U.S. borrows a trillion dollars a year just to maintain a "post-industrial" economy where most people live from paycheck to paycheck. Yet our political and media elite still don't see any problem with opening our markets to China, just as they still think the Muslim Brotherhood is a secular organization that supports freedom and equality.
Our elite's alliance with the Chinese elite has been catastrophic, but it is their alliance with the elite of the Muslim world that defies common sense.
Our elite enthusiastically supported the Arab Spring, believing that it would bring about freedom and democracy in the Middle East as part of the global march to peace and unity. They believed this because this is what their friends in the Muslim world told them. The "Arab Spring" was actually an Islamist movement heavily influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood. It was a movement to overthrow secular dictators. There were some secular reformers trying to hijack the movement, but they never had a chance.
It is the Islamist elite of the Middle East who befriended our elite and convinced them to support the Arab Spring. The Islamist elite have convinced our elite that they must silence all critics of Islam. They have convinced them that this is way to stop terrorism, since criticism of Islam is used by the terrorists for recruitment. Mean-spirited criticism of Islam or Muslims can obviously be used by Islamic terrorists for recruitment, but the jihadists do not repeat legitimate criticism of Islam. They merely try to kill the person who says it.
Amazingly, the Islamists have also convinced our elite that we should shine a spotlight on all attacks on Muslims. When an inebriated passenger stabs a Muslim cab driver, or when a school official calls the police because a Muslim student brought a bomb to school, our elite are convinced that the way to respond is to put it on the front page, make it the lead story, shout it from the rooftop. Yet, clearly, events like these can be used by the terrorists for recruitment. This doesn't make sense until you realize that our elite will believe what they are told by their friends. Their friends, the Islamist elite, want to magnify attacks against Muslims in order to encourage Islamic terrorism, but they want to silence critics of Islam since legitimate criticism of Islam can weaken the faith, including the faith of the terrorists.
Our elite are convinced that attacks on Muslims like the one in Christchurch should receive a great deal of attention because an act of violence against Muslims could never be used for recruitment by Islamic terrorists, unlike legitimate criticism of Mohammed, which the terrorist would never repeat.
Our elite are being played because they view themselves as global citizens. They view the elite of other nations as their fellow citizens, and they view their fellow Americans as their enemy.
Watch–
Rep. Matt Gaetz: Republicans, Democrats Have Been ‘the Valets’ for
Multinational Corporations
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) says
past Republican and Democrat presidents have been “the valets” for
multinational corporations and business lobbyists with their support for
job-killing multilateral free trade deals.
Why Democrats Oppose The Wall: Trump Will Actually Build It
One of the most disgusting things to come out of the
Obama administration was "Operation Fast and Furious," where members
of the Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) allowed
illegal gun sales to go through – commonly referred to as "gun
walking" – in order to track buyers and sellers they believed were
connected to the Mexican drug cartels. Nearly 2,000 firearms were sold and were
eventually found throughout the United States and Mexico. Two of them were used
to kill Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. BETH BAUMANN
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/11/frontpage-hidden-agenda-of-pueblo-sin.html
THE DEMOCRATS’ SEISMIC SHIFT ON IMMIGRATION
Erasing
boundaries, embracing chaos.
Justin Trudeau’s Canada Embraces a World Without Borders
THE BILLIONAIRES’S GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR WIDER
OPEN BORDERS
the true cost of all that “cheap” labor is passed
along to the middle class.
"This doesn't include the costs of illegal immigration to society, which provides health care,
housing, education, child care, and legal services to illegal
aliens. Even though immigration advocates claim that illegal aliens
do indeed pay taxes, the dollar amount pales in comparison to the cost of the many services they
receive."
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-globalist-democrat-party-for-wider_29.html
THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS WAGES WAR ON AMERICA!
Obamanomics:
How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends,
Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses
BARACK OBAMA
GLOBALIST FOR BANKSTERS AND THE SUPER RICH and
OPEN BORDERS TO FINISH OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/09/barack-obama-and-his-muslim-style.html
“Democrats Move Towards ‘Oligarchical
Socialism,’ Says Forecaster Joel Kotkin.”
FAKEBOOK and
GOOGLE ASSAULT FREE SPEECH TO BUILD THE GLOBALISTS’ BILLIONAIRES’ DICTATORSHIP
FOR THE RICH
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/10/facebook-and-google-assault-free-speech.html
Watch–
Rep. Matt Gaetz: Republicans, Democrats Have Been ‘the Valets’ for
Multinational Corporations
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/17/matt-gaetz-republicans-democrats-valets-multinational-corporations/
2:31
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) says
past Republican and Democrat presidents have been “the valets” for
multinational corporations and business lobbyists with their support for
job-killing multilateral free trade deals.
During an interview on Fox News’s Lou Dobbs Tonight, Gaetz called
out former Republicans and Democrats who have allowed the big business lobby,
Chamber of Commerce, and corporations to dictate U.S. trade policy.
Gaetz said:
Breitbart TV
CLOSE | X
Well, this president will take [the
business lobby] on. The difference is that
presidents that are Republican and Democrat in the past have been the valets
for the special interest on K Street and the multinational companies.
Those people didn’t elect Donald Trump. [Emphasis added]
Donald Trump was elected in
spite of the millions of dollars that big business put against him. So he has a unique opportunity to
actually fight for the American worker. [Emphasis added]
You look at where this 2020
election is going to be won, in Pennsylvania, in Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota,
there are a lot of people there who want a fair shake at putting the best product out into the world
without being the laughing stock as a consequence of bad trade deals. Reciprocal trade will get the job done. [Emphasis
added]
Gaetz, who is co-sponsoring Rep.
Sean Duffy’s Reciprocal Trade Act, encouraged House and Senate Democrats
to sign onto the effort for fair trade that gives Trump the authority to impose
reciprocal tariffs on specific foreign imports.
“A lot of Democrats represent these
districts in Michigan and Pennsylvania and Minnesota and what are they going to
say to their workers when multinational companies keep trying to offshore
jobs,” Gaetz said. “We’ve got this president and a few Republicans fighting for
the American worker. We could use a few of those pro-Trump Democrats here in
the Congress.”
The outsourcing and offshoring of
American jobs to foreign countries is a business model that has been used by
multinational corporations with little to no government repercussions.
Corporations like AT&T, Harley-Davidson, Ralph Lauren, Nike, Verizon, and IBM have
all laid off Americans in order to send their jobs overseas to countries like
China, India, and the Phillippines.
Why Democrats Oppose The Wall: Trump Will Actually Build It
The
conservative consensus is that Democrats don't want to fund President
Trump's wall because they hate him. Well, yes, Democrats
do indeed hate President Trump, and yes, it's a deep-seated hatred, a visceral,
soul-rotting hatred, but that's not the real reason they won't fund the
wall.
The
biggest reason Democrats won't even partially fund the wall is their absolute
certainty that given the money, the president will actually build the
thing.
President
Trump's not some out-of-the-loop politician who can be outmaneuvered
by a Deep State whose embedded bureaucrats will tell him everything's going
swimmingly while they sabotage the project with cost overruns and endless
delays. No, the president will know how much it should and will
cost, how long it should and will take, and how to overcome government
roadblocks. This is his wheelhouse. He's done it his
whole adult life.
And,
since the wall is his signature issue, his personal passion, President Trump's
going to be all over the construction. That looming steel
show-stopper will be blocking invaders in record time, under budget and ahead
of schedule.
Knowing
that the wall will become a reality if the President gets the cash brings out
the cheap-labor-express, wealthy power brokers like the Billionaires for Open Borders: Michael Bloomberg; Rupert Murdoch;
other distinguished members of the Forbes 500; and, as Lou Dobbs often reminds us, the "globalists, the Chamber of Commerce, the
Business Roundtable, Koch brothers and Wall Street."
But
it's not just the Washington insiders who like cheap renewable
labor. Retailgiants like Target, Walmart, and others reap the benefits of
illegal immigration. In fact, most industries get in on the deal.
- 22% in legal services, advertising,
employment services, landscaping and waste management, dry cleaning, nail
salons, car washes and religious organizations.
- 18% in the leisure and hospitality
sector, lodging, food services, theme parks, transportation, and other
tourism oriented products and services
- 16% in the construction
industry
- 12% wholesale and retail trade
So
most of the corporate world has some interest in stopping a border
wall. It's a top priority for many. These interests make
for a powerful force, and they will not back down.
The
second reason Democrats will never fund the wall is their voter base – not
unions or teachers, but illegal aliens, who broke our laws, crashed our border,
and now infringe on American's sacred right to elect their government by
illegally casting votes.
One
glaring example was the 2016 presidential election, where Hillary Clinton
"garnered more than 800,000 votes from non-citizens." How
many of those illegal votes decided congressional or state races?
Democrats
continue to find creative ways for illegals to vote. There's ballot-harvesting, where a third party collects ballots
from voters then drops them off at polling places. Once on the
rolls, political campaigns have free license to go find that person, or even if
they don't find him, just turn in a ballot in his name.
Then
there's the Motor-Voter debacle: a million illegal aliens in California have
Driver's Licenses. California admitted that over 1,500 people were
illegallyregistered under new automatic voter registration.
California's
not an anomaly. Twelve states and the District of Columbia have now enacted laws to allow
illegal aliens to obtain a driver's license – the gold standard for
identification.
So there's
cheap labor and a growing Democrat base, but those issues were there when
Democrats voted for previous "barriers," so what's the real
problem?
The
deal-breaker is a missing out clause. As I said, construction is
President Trump's wheelhouse, so the wall will go up quickly. No
time to pull the legislation back or rewrite it, as they did with President
Bush.
Bush
signed the Secure Fence Act of 2006 into law after it was passed by
huge bipartisan majorities in the House and Senate. The law ordered
the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to construct 700 miles of fencing
along the southern border and authorized the addition of lights, cameras,
and sensors to enhance security. The law explicitly required the
wall to be constructed of "at least two layers of reinforced
fencing."
When
Democrats took control of Congress a few months later, an amendmentwas
added to the 2008 spending bill that gutted the law. So Democrats
and open-border Republicans were able to avoid a politically unpopular vote
against the wall, then quietly gut its construction. President Trump
will not allow that recourse.
Herein
lies the real threat to the open-border gang: that the wall a will be built and
is a permanent fixture, not a fence drug dealers can build a ramp to roll over and deliver their poisonous drugs. It
is not a fence easily scaled or easily dismantled by future Democrat
presidents.
No,
the Trump wall will be steel, will be permanent. If a Democrat is
elected POTUS at a future date, he will not be able to simply undo the wall and
reopen the border. That's the non-negotiable piece: the fact that a
steel wall is irreversible. No escape clause.
Is
the Trump wall impenetrable? No, even a steel wall can be
breached. A Department of Homeland Security test of a steel slat prototype proved that it could be cut
through with a saw, a "common tool".
The steel bollard design is internally
reinforced with materials that require time and multiple industrial tools to
breach, thereby providing U.S. Border Patrol agents additional response time to
affect a successful law enforcement resolution. In the event that
one of the steel bollards becomes damaged, it is quick and cost-effective to
repair.
Rush
Limbaugh said the conventional wisdom is that the president will declare a national
emergency to build the wall, then reopen the government, making Schumer and
Pelosi the winners on the government shutdown, the ones who held the
line.
I'm
all in for the national emergency, but hopefully the President will then resume
negotiations. At that point, the wall will no longer be a sticking
point, so surely Democrats will fund drones, 750 U.S. Border Patrol agents,
2,000 new officers for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), more judges
and attorneys to reduce the 650,000 immigration case backlog;" and
new technology along the southern border".
After
all, Democrats advocate for many of these solutions instead of a wall, so why
wouldn't they eagerly embrace these security measures once the wall's off the
table? Or is their position going to be no border security of any
kind?
The
standoff over the wall looks like a lose-lose, a Mexican standoff, but the
president can be totally victorious in this battle.
In
every battle there comes a time when both sides consider themselves beaten,
then he who continues the attack wins. Ulysses S. Grant
Stay
strong, Mr. President, the American people are with you.
THE (REALITY) OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY:
Anti-Semitic, open borders for cheaper labor and
funded by criminal banksters… and these pols are making vast fortunes sucking
the blood of America!
We must not let them cheat their way to power
over the rest of us. Their ongoing vote fraud must be stopped and
the Democrats need to take a look at themselves and at what they have become.
It's not a pretty picture. What they have become threatens to
destroy the greatest nation on the planet and they are doing it on
purpose. They have nothing but contempt for the US as founded and
for those of us who love this country. PATRICIA McCARTHY – AMERICAN THINKER
“Then we suffered the rattling election of Barack Obama,
whose active membership in a white-, Jewish-, and America-hating church was
well known to the electorate. His close personal relationship
with the likes of his adored Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan was no
secret. Obama was open about his goals. He told us he was
out to "fundamentally transform America" and the world.” ALAN BERGSTEIN
“There is a deep racist and anti-Semitic disease in the
leadership of the Democrats. As Senator Cory Booker brings his hatred for the
Jewish State to the Senate, he should be asked whether he agrees with his hero,
“The only good Zionist is a dead Zionist we must take a lesson from Hitler”. DANIEL GREENFIELD
OBAMANOMICS
TO SERVE BANKSTERS
AND
GLOBAL BILLIONAIRES
"One of the premier institutions of
big business, JP Morgan Chase, issued an internal report on the
eve of the 10th anniversary of the 2008 crash, which warned that
another “great liquidity crisis” was possible, and that a
government bailout on the scale of that effected by Bush and Obama
will produce social unrest, “in light of the potential impact
of central bank actions in driving inequality between
asset owners and labor."
ISLAMIST BARACK OBAMA
*
“Of
course, one of the main reasons the nation is now “divided, resentful and angry” is because
race-baiting, Islamist, class warrior Barack Hussein Obama was
president for eight long years." MATTHEW VADUM
*
"But the Obamas are the center of the most delusional
cult of personality that the media has yet spawned. And so we get bizarre
pieces like these." MONICA SHOWALTER
*
"Along with Obama, Pelosi and
Schumer are responsible for incalculable damage done to this country over the
eight years of that administration." PATRICIA McCARTHY
GLOBALIST BARACK OBAMA
AND NANCY PELOSI’S CONSPIRACY TO SABOTAGE HOMELAND SECURITY AND KEEP AMERICA FLOODED
WITH DEM VOTING ILLEGALS
"Along with Obama, Pelosi and
Schumer are responsible for incalculable damage done to this country over the
eight years of that administration." PATRICIA McCARTHY
One of the most disgusting things to come out of the
Obama administration was "Operation Fast and Furious," where members
of the Department of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) allowed
illegal gun sales to go through – commonly referred to as "gun
walking" – in order to track buyers and sellers they believed were
connected to the Mexican drug cartels. Nearly 2,000 firearms were sold and were
eventually found throughout the United States and Mexico. Two of them were used
to kill Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry. BETH BAUMANN
THE CONSPIRACY TO
SABOTAGE HOMELAND SECURITY
The Democrat Party’s secret agenda for wider open borders,
more welfare for invading illegals, more jobs and free anything they illegally
vote for…. All to destroy the two-party system and build the GLOBALISTS’
DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR WIDER OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED.
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/11/frontpage-hidden-agenda-of-pueblo-sin.html
Demonstrably and irrefutably the Democrat Party became the
party whose principle objective is to thoroughly transform the nature of the
American electorate by means of open borders and the mass, unchecked
importation of illiterate third world peasants who will vote in overwhelming
numbers for Democrats and their La Raza welfare state. FRONTPAGE MAG
THE DEMOCRATS’ SEISMIC SHIFT ON IMMIGRATION
Erasing
boundaries, embracing chaos.
January 10, 2019
The
Apostle James might not have thought much of Chuck Schumer or Nancy Pelosi or
Dianne Feinstein or Bill Clinton or even Barack “He-Who-Can-Do-No-Wrong” Obama.
They are just some of the political prodigies who change their policies as
often as Lady Gaga changes her clothes—about
five times a day.
James
has a juicy jibe for such political pendulums. He calls them “double-minded,”
warning his readers that “a double-minded man is unstable in all his ways.” If
you are going to swing from policy to policy like Tarzan the Ape Man, at least
clarify and justify your political flip-flopping.
A
little over a decade ago, the Democrats were singing in four-part harmony to
President Trump’s “we need another brick in the wall” anthem. “We simply cannot
allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented,
unchecked, and circumventing the line of people who are waiting patiently,
diligently and lawfully to become immigrants into this country,” belted out Barack Obama.
Cue
prima donna Pelosi, 2008: “Do we have a commitment to
secure the border? Yes.” Why? “Because we do need to address the issue of
immigration and the challenge we have of undocumented people in our country. We
certainly do not want any more coming in.” Solo from Chuck Schumer, Georgetown,
2009: “Illegal immigration is wrong. A primary goal of comprehensive
immigration reform must be to dramatically curtail future illegal immigration.”
In
2013, each of the 54 Democrats in the Senate voted for $46 billion in border
security, which included 700 miles in border fencing. Blaring through their
Marxist megaphones they pleaded the plight of low-skilled American workers
whose wages were hit by cheap immigrant labor. The burden on America’s welfare
state would be intolerable, they wailed.
So
what are the sirens luring the Democrats to the perilous shores of open
borders? Why now? Why so radically? Why display this double-mindedness in such
a short span of time?
Commentators
from conservative Dan
Bongino to leftwing The Atlantic posit two
political explanations. First, more illegals means more votes for the
Democrats. Second, given the contagion of the Trump Derangement Syndrome,
“Democrats hate the wall because Trump loves it” as the National Review puts it bluntly.
There
is an economic explanation: globalists like George Soros, Mark Zuckerberg and
Bill Gates (the latter duo helped found the border-busting FWD.us) have made a
Faustian bargain with their Democratic hangers-on. The UN and the EU are in the
vanguard of an open borders agenda and the Democrats are keen to keep up with
the globalist Joneses (or, in this case, Merkels) and pro-migrant Pope Francis. If not for Trump, it
the US would have possibly signed up to the UN global compact on migration in
December 2018.
Maybe
the Democrats were lying like Pinocchio on steroids when they said a decade ago
they believed in border security and immigration control. Maybe they never
really changed their position but simply used taqiyya—the Islamic doctrine of
deception—to consolidate their position with gullible voters.
The
Democrat ideological pedigree would surely predispose its activists to share
Marx’s vision of nation states collapsing and workers of the world uniting in
the new egalitarian heaven on earth.
Islam,
in some sense, shares the Left’s doctrine of open borders. Especially potent in
the West over the last decade, Islam’s dream is a universal Caliphate that will
bulldoze national borders and unite the Umma—the international Muslim
community—under the rule of Shariah. Moreover, Muslims are seeking to migrate
to Western countries to push their proselytizing agenda. “Muhammad mapped a migration master plan centuries before Merkel,”
is how I put it.
A
boundary demarcates a nation. Tear down borders and you wipe a nation off the
map—never mind casting cartographers into outer darkness! Marriage between a
man and a woman demarcates a family—the basic unit of society. Destroy marriage
and you destroy the family. If a family can mean anything—from serial orgies to
sologamy—a family will ultimately mean nothing.
Just
before the Democrats changed their position on geographical boundaries—they did
a 180 on the boundary protecting marriage and family. The anarchist U-turn on
marriage by the Democrats defies a number of the above explanations that
explain this flip-flop with political or economic explanations.
Above
all, Trump wasn’t the tectonic factor when Democrats made a seismic shift from
heterosexual to gay marriage.
In
September 1996, US Congress passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA). The law
defined marriage as a strictly opposite-sex institution. Not a single
Republican senator voted against the legislation; in the House of
Representatives only Republican Steven Gunderson voted against it.
Democrats
strongly supported the legislation (Nancy Pelosi an exception among leading
Democrats) with House members voting in favor by a nearly two-to-one margin
(118-65) and Senate Democrats surpassing that mark (32-14). President Bill
Clinton signed DOMA into law.
By
the time America’s first legal same-sex marriage took place in 2004, the
Democrats had dramatically reversed their position. In the same year, House
Democrats vigorously opposed the Marriage Protection Act by a 176-27 margin.
Darel Paul in From Tolerance to Equality: How Elites brought America to
Same-Sex Marriagedocuments the “tremendous collapse of
support within the party’s House caucus for a traditionalist definition of
marriage, from 64% in 1996 to a mere 13% in 2004.”
He
notes: “In the 1990s even the most liberal Democrats avoided clear public
endorsements of same-sex marriage” but by “2004 all three minor Democratic
candidates for president were calling openly for national same-sex marriage.”
There
is a fundamental parallel between the volte-face on
immigration and on marriage by the Democrats. Both have to do with
distinctions—and making distinctions is a biblical imperative that goes back to
the archetypal story of creation in the first chapter of the book of Genesis.
I
first spotted this when studying intermediate Hebrew. I was memorizing Genesis
1 in Hebrew but hit the brakes when I reached verse 4b: “And God separated the
light from the darkness.” ‘Separate’ was a funny verb! But it recurred again
and again in the chapter. Later I discovered commentator and biblical scholar
Dennis Prager’s stunning exposition on
distinctions in the Torah, explaining how separations are God’s signature tune
in creation. God himself creates separations or distinctions or barriers or
boundaries, says Prager.
The
deep-rooted problem with the Democrats is not political, economic or even
Donald Trump. It is spiritual. Radical secularization has led to a radical
removal of all boundaries—beginning with feminist bulldozing of the boundary
between man and woman and culminating paradoxically with the gender fluidity
non-existence of this boundary—much to the outrage of some radical feminists.
Laws
are predicated on boundaries. If Democrats no longer believe in markers that
distinguish right from wrong, good from evil, lawful from lawless, order from
anarchy, electing them as lawmakers can only be self-defeating at best,
suicidal at worst.
There
is, of course, one great benefit to be had from a complete erosion of borders
and boundaries—whether in the area of immigration or in the realm of the
family.
In
biblical religion, God’s boundaries in creation keeps order in place: the sea
and the land; light and darkness; day and night; human and animal; etc. The separations
serve to sustain creation and prevent it from backsliding into primeval chaos.
In
the religion of Leftism, the great monster of chaos is a prelude to the
Leviathan of the State emerging and subduing the chaos with a view to establish
its own idolatrous hegemony.
If this is the ultimate goal of the Democratic Party, the Chuck
Schumers and Nancy Pelosis of this world might not be so double-minded or
unstable after all. On the contrary, they will be pursuing their master plan of
achieving totalitarian State control with remarkable and ruthless
single-mindedness.
Justin Trudeau’s Canada Embraces a World Without Borders
The Liberal government of Prime Minister
Justin Trudeau is set to sign the UN
Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration at an intergovernmental meeting in Marrakech, Morocco, on
December 10, 2018.
Few Canadians are aware of what this UN Global Compact represents;
even fewer have been consulted, and without any mandate except for a parliamentary
majority, Justin Trudeau is committed in signing Canada into an agreement with
far-reaching conseque
nces -- not only for Canadians. Canada agreeing to abide
by the agreement will also have consequences for Americans, as among migrants
entering Canada might well be those intending to sneak into the United States
across the world’s longest open border.
The UN Global Compact spells out, in 34 pages of fine print,
requirements for member-states to adopt as policy accommodating unfettered mass
migration from the global South to the North.
Human migration is as old as human history. But in modern times,
especially in the period following the end of the Second World War, resulting
in massive dislocation of the European population, settlement of migrants was
arranged and conducted by national governments with support of their citizens.
The Global Compact, instead, is a UN top-down arrangement to deal with
the migration problem turned into the most disruptive global crisis in recent
years. This time, the crisis is the result of the massive failure of
UN-engineered policies of socio-economic development of post-colonial societies
in Africa, Asia, and Central and South America.
What we have witnessed since the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989
and the end of the Cold War in 1992, is a spike in wars, genocide, failed
states, and terrorism. These have cumulatively resulted in mass migration as an
escape from the collective failure of people in those countries to build and
administer an orderly society, despite trillions of aid dollars provided by
countries of the North, directly or through the UN agencies.
And despite this record of the failure of UN-driven development
policies, the UN remains insistent on demanding more of the same in its 2030
Agenda for Sustainable Development. The Global Compact is a critical part of
this agenda, based on the notion that “Migration contributes to positive
development outcomes.”
There is little or no evidence of migration from the global South
providing for positive development in the developing countries of that global
South. Instead, the Global Compact turns migration into a human rights issue
and confers “rights” on migrants that are the same as those of the citizens of
the host countries, “rights” those governments are obliged to “respect, protect
and fulfil.”
Any relationship at a minimum has two parties involved. The
Global Compact claims for itself “a 360-degree vision of international
migration…to optimize benefits of migration.” But it focuses entirely on the
needs and rights of one party, the migrants, without taking into account the
rights of the people of host countries, given the mounting evidence of how
costly, unsettling and disruptive the “invasion” of migrants from the global
South to the North has been.
The so-called Arab Spring of 2011, heralding demands for democracy
and overthrow of repressive authoritarian governments, very rapidly turned into
Arab nightmare. Civil wars in Libya and Syria, with poorly planned
interventions by the UN, became uncontainable and spread anarchy. As central
authorities collapsed, internal movements of people turned into a mass
migration from the Middle East and North Africa, and joined by people from
Central Asia and sub-Saharan Africa as economic migrants, headed for Europe.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s invitation in 2015 to Syrian
migrants was a detonator of what has now become the migration crisis from the
global South to Europe and North America.
The current wave of migrants from the Middle East and North Africa
might only be the harbinger of an approaching tide gathering force to head
north in the near future. It is expected that the African population will
double to 2.5 billion by 2050. Africa will remain the poorest continent, and
this doubling of population will make it the most crowded continent with a military
age cohort of young men ready to march. The trajectory of African migration can
only be in one direction: due north.
The answer to this ballooning migration crisis came from Angela
Merkel in Berlin in the week when the world marked the 100th anniversary of the
end of World War One. In speaking to an audience of German parliamentarians and
foreign guests, Merkel said, “In this day nation-states must today – should today, I say – be
ready to give up sovereignty.”
And to whom, we may ask?
Since nation-states are obsolete in Merkel’s view, they should
fold up and make way for a world without borders administered by multinational
organizations under the authority of the UN. But, ironically, Merkel’s advice
is primarily directed to the long-standing old and stable nation-states of
Europe and North America, and not to the newly established post-colonial states
of the global South, such as China, India or South Africa.
The Global Compact that Justin Trudeau has already committed to
sign is one among the many agreements the UN has been pushing in the making of
a borderless world, including also the Paris
Agreement for climate change and R2P or “Responsibility
to Protect.”
The UN needs advanced democracies of the North to become
signatories and help finance UN-prepared agreements and treaties as
international laws, regardless of the customs and legal traditions of these
long existing independent sovereign nation-states.
There are, however, a number of developed countries – Austria,
Australia, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Israel, Poland, Slovakia, the
United States – that have indicated they will not sign the Global Compact in
Morocco.
The Global Compact is also Shariah-compliant, since the 57-member
Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) is the largest bloc of member-states
in the UN. And OIC partnership with the EU in the UN makes for a formidable
Red-Green alliance in European and North American politics of the traditional
Left joining hands with the Shariah-promoting Islamic organizations, such as
the Muslim Brotherhood.
In accordance with the OIC demand at the UN, the European Human
Rights Court has ruled any criticism or insult of Islam and its prophet is not
protected free speech, and it might be penalized under “hate speech” provisions
of criminal codes.
Similarly, Justin Trudeau’s Liberal parliamentary majority in 2017
adopted motion M-103, which condemns any critical discussion of Islam and
Muslims as “Islamophobia,” and under the “hate speech” provision of the human
rights commissions in Canada might be subject to prosecution.
Moreover, the Global Compact requires, in terms of UN-speak a
controlled media that abides by the UN norms and censors any critical
discussion of UN policies relating to migrants as not “ethical.”
The recently announced hand-out of $600
million to the Canadian media over
5 years by Justin Trudeau is in keeping with with the Global Compact’s requirement
for a docile media trained in UN-speak to enable the making of a UN-envisioned
borderless global order.
Justin Trudeau’s readiness to sign the Global Compact comes as no
surprise, since in his publicly stated view, Canada is a post-nationalist state
with no core identity. Hence, in Trudeau’s version of Canada, there is no
tradition to revere, no sacred values to defend, and no identity or history
worth preserving.
Justin Trudeau is the poster face of the UN-envisioned borderless
world. And into this UN-designed global order for the 21st century Trudeau-led
“Canada without borders” is headed.
Salim Mansur teaches at
Western University, London, Canada and is the author of The Qur’an Problem and
Islamism (2017).
THE BILLIONAIRES’S GLOBALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR WIDER
OPEN BORDERS
the true cost of all that “cheap” labor is passed
along to the middle class.
"This doesn't include the costs of illegal immigration to society, which provides health care,
housing, education, child care, and legal services to illegal
aliens. Even though immigration advocates claim that illegal aliens
do indeed pay taxes, the dollar amount pales in comparison to the cost of the many services they
receive."
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/11/the-globalist-democrat-party-for-wider_29.html
Meanwhile, despite the
highest taxes in the nation, California is $1.3 trillion in debt – unemployment
is at a staggering 11%. California's wacko giveaways to illegals
include in-state tuition, amounting to $25 million of financial
aid. Nearly a million illegals have California driver's
licenses. L.A. County has
144% more registered voters than there are residents of legal voting
age. Clearly, illegals are illegally
voting.
THE (REALITY) OF THE GLOBALIST
DEMOCRAT PARTY AS IT SERVES THE RICH:
Anti-Semitic, open borders for
cheaper labor and funded by criminal banksters… and these pols are making vast
fortunes sucking the blood of America!
We must not let them cheat their
way to power over the rest of us. Their ongoing vote fraud must be
stopped and the Democrats need to take a look at themselves and at what they
have become. It's not a pretty picture. What they have become
threatens to destroy the greatest nation on the planet and they are doing it on
purpose. They have nothing but contempt for the US as founded and
for those of us who love this country. PATRICIA McCARTHY – AMERICAN THINKER
“Then
we suffered the rattling election of Barack Obama, whose active membership in a
white-, Jewish-, and America-hating church was well known to the
electorate. His close personal relationship with the likes of
his adored Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Louis Farrakhan was no
secret. Obama was open about his goals. He told us he was
out to "fundamentally transform America" and the world.” ALAN BERGSTEIN
“There is a deep racist and
anti-Semitic disease in the leadership of the Democrats. As Senator Cory Booker
brings his hatred for the Jewish State to the Senate, he should be asked
whether he agrees with his hero, “The only good Zionist is a dead Zionist we
must take a lesson from Hitler”. DANIEL GREENFIELD
“The radicals seek nothing less than
secession from the United States whether to form their own sovereign state or
to reunify with Mexico. Those who desire reunification with Mexico are
irredentists who seek to reclaim Mexico's "lost" territories in the
American Southwest.” Maria Hsia Chang
Professor of Political Science, University of Nevada Reno
THE OBAMA – CLINTON – GLOBALIST CONSPIRACY: Finish off the
middle-class and build a “cheap” labor Mex servant class.
“Our
entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and Republican alike, has become
a kleptocracy approaching par with third-world hell-holes. This
is the way a great country is raided by its elite.” ---- Karen
McQuillan THEAMERICAN THINKER.com
THE BILLIONAIRE CLASS WAGES WAR ON AMERICA!
"GOP estb. is
using the $5 billion border-wall fight to hide up to four blue/white-
collar cheap-labor
programs in lame-duck DHS budget. Donors are worried that
salaries are too
damn high, & estb. media does not want to know."
TOP EVIL CORPORATIONS LOOTING
AMERICA
Goldman Sachs TRUMP CRONIES – CLINTON CRONIES
JPMorgan Chase OBAMA CRONIES
ExxonMobil
Halliburton BUSH
CRIME FAMILY CRONIES
British American Tobacco
Dow Chemical
DuPont
Bayer
Microsoft
Google CLINTON CRONIES
Facebook OBAMA CRONIES
Amazon
Walmart
GET THIS BOOK!
Obamanomics:
How Barack Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends,
Corporate Lobbyists, and Union Bosses
BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY
Editorial Reviews
Obama Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same “special
interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are profiting
handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers, small
businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative reporter
Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and the White
House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is delivering
corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling corporate
America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s OBAMANOMICS TO
SERVE THE RICH AND GLOBALIST BILLIONAIRES.
BARACK OBAMA
GLOBALIST FOR BANKSTERS AND THE SUPER RICH and
OPEN BORDERS TO FINISH OFF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/09/barack-obama-and-his-muslim-style.html
“Democrats Move Towards ‘Oligarchical
Socialism,’ Says Forecaster Joel Kotkin.”
FAKEBOOK and
GOOGLE ASSAULT FREE SPEECH TO BUILD THE GLOBALISTS’ BILLIONAIRES’ DICTATORSHIP
FOR THE RICH
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/10/facebook-and-google-assault-free-speech.html
THE INVITED INVADING
HORDES: IT’S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED!
"In the decade
following the financial crisis of 2007-2008, the capitalist class has delivered
powerful blows to the social position of the working class. As a result, the
working class in the US, the world’s “richest country,” faces levels of
economic hardship not seen since the 1930s."
"Inequality has
reached unprecedented levels: the wealth of America’s three richest people
now equals the net worth of the poorest half of the US population."
No comments:
Post a Comment