Cruz: New Allegation 'Shows the Obsession' to Smear Kavanaugh; 'There's Nobody They Don't Want to Impeach'
MICHELLE
MALKIN
It is my contention that this grand
unearth-and-destroy spectacle was planned, coordinated and facilitated by (Sen.
Dianne Feinstein) Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats and their staffers.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/10/michelle-malkin-witches-of-kavanaugh.html
BUT
WHAT DID WE EVER HEAR FROM THEIR MASSIVE FOUL AND CORRUPT MOUTHS ABOUT THE
CRIMES OF OBOMB AND THE CLINTON CRIME DUAL???
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
Another spurious Kavanaugh smear proves the depravity of the left
Each time we think the left can stoop no lower into the gutter of the politics of personal destruction, they prove us wrong and descend further into yet another of Dante's circles of hell. And who is right there leading the charge? The New York Times, perhaps the most despicable news outlet on the planet, and long ago re-formulated into an arm of the DNC intent upon foisting their particular agenda upon the masses. Keep in mind that they have nothing but contempt for said masses whom they believe to be dumber than rocks and so easily led down the destructive path of socialism. So how stupid do they think we are with their latest story, a smear on Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh? How stupid could we be, really, that we would fall for another fabricated allegation of sexual impropriety by a man they already put through the wringer? This time, they've thrown out to us an allegation that even the supposed "victim" does not recall.
There are not words that adequately express the noxious corruption of these craven people: Kavanaugh's original accuser, during his confirmation hearings, was Christine Blasey-Ford. Her accusations and the subsequent circus of hearings during which three of those people running for the presidency and every other Democratic member of the House Judiciary Committee behaved like fourth-grade bullies, were a disgrace of monumental proportions.
The whole thing was entirely false from the outset, conceived and mounted by a sleazy group of leftist activists to prevent a decent man from being confirmed, not because he did anything wrong, but because, as it later came out, they feared the undoing of Roe v. Wade.
They did it earlier to nominee Robert Bork and won; they lost when they did it to Clarence Thomas, to this day a national treasure on the SCOTUS as was Antonin Scalia. The same bunch of retrogrades has again attempted to see Justice Kavanaugh impeached and destroyed in the face of Ruth Bader Ginsburg's imminent retirement and the coming appointment of a new Justice by President Trump.
These scoundrels are well and truly a menace to society, not just the United States but to Western civilization at large. They want to see it shattered so they can rebuild it in their authoritarian vision that brings to mind the socialist and genocidal demise of Venezuela, not to mention Nazi Germany, Lenin's and Stalin's Soviet Union and Mao's China. Does anyone think the rich elites of Venezuela give a damn about the Venezuelan people who are literally starving? No, they do not. The folks at the NYT and their acolytes in the media and politics who so loathe those of us deemed deplorable are all on board to shut us up, no matter what it takes. Smear a good man again and again without a shred of evidence? Works for them. They have no scruples. None. If they win the day, we will all be starving in the streets and eating our pets, too. Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden and the rest of this shabby group of wannabes know that if they gain the power to control how the rest of us live, they will be sitting pretty without a care in the world.
Naturally Harris, Warren, Beto O'Rourke, and Julian Castro were johnny-on-the spot to again call for Kavanaugh's impeachment within minutes of the NYT's repellant implication. Apparently, not one of them grasps the constitutional constraints of "innocent until proven guilty." There is not a person of honor among them. No, the people in their way are always guilty by allegation, no evidence, no trial needed. Their plan is ruination by rumor and innuendo. These Alinskyites who are attempting to take us all down according to the Cloward-Piven formula need to be stopped. They are not only un-American, they are criminally unprincipled.
Hopefully, no sentient American will fall for this new scheme to ravage Justice Kavanaugh. This gambit proves without a doubt that the NYT is an anti-American agent of misery and shame. If only every voter would read Mark Levin's Unfreedom of the Press! Long may Justice Kavanaugh serve on the Supreme Court. May those collaborating to yet again bring him down be brought low, be seen for the reprehensible villains they are. The NYT should by now be extinct for its decades of traitorous attempts to undermine our democratic republic in favor of a tyranny of the elitist, authoritarian left. President Trump is exactly right when he calls them the enemy of the people.
Image credit: Photo illustration by Monica Showalter from public domain sources
Yes, Justice Kavanaugh should sue!
The left can't let go of Justice Brett Kavanaugh. I guess that's what Roe v Wade has done to them.
The latest attack is familiar and it involves the New York Times:
Times reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly stated in a piece published Saturday that well before Kavanaugh became a federal judge "at least seven people" had heard about how Kavanaugh allegedly exposed himself to Deborah Ramirez at a party.The report also included a new allegation that Kavanaugh similarly thrust his penis at an unwilling woman at an alcohol-fueled college party.The president defended Kavanaugh, whom he nominated to the court in 2018.
At some point, this malicious reporting has to stop.
First, this "new" story is simply a replay of one retailed last year in whcih Deborah Ramirez claimed to be the victim. It was thoroughly debunked at the time and the Times story adds no new evidence.
Second, the alleged attack occurred in the 1980s at a college party. Did anyone actually see it? The Times reportage doesn't mention anyone.
Third, I think that there should be limits on attacking public people, especially allegations like this that go back 35-plus years.
President Trump is right. Justice Kavanaugh should sue and force his critics to take the stand in a trial. Maybe it will never happen, but enough with these attacks on Justice Kavanaugh, and, more specifically, judges who think that voters rather than courts should decide the matter of abortion.
P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.
BURN THE WITCHES AT
THE STAKE and then BOIL THEM IN GREASE!
Where were these
evil women when serial rapist BILL CLINTON, BILL COSBY and CLINTON CRONY,
HARVEY WEINSTEIN were on a roll???
FEINSTEIN, BOXER,
CLINTON, HITLERMALA, PELOSI, WARREN and MAXINE WATERS… faces of staggering
corruption and evil!
Her lawyers and Dianne Feinstein have
abused her horribly and used her as their tool to ruin Kavanaugh. PATRICIA
McCARTHY / AMERICANTHINKER
NANCY PELOSI, and her LA RAZA SISTERS, SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN,
FORMER SEN. BARBARA BOXER and NOW SEN. KAMALA HARRIS are a pantheon of
staggering self-serving corruption.
They and their families have all gotten filthy rich off of
these women’s elected office.
Their endless hispandering for the illegals’ votes has turned
California into Mexifornia, a drug, gang and anchor baby welfare third-world
dumpster!
After Running Smear Filled Story on Kavanaugh, New York Times
Issues a 'Correction,' Then Continues Lying
|
Source:
AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File
Over
the weekend the New York Times, the alleged
"paper of record" for America, ran an excerpt from a new book about
Justice Brett Kavanaugh. In the excerpt, Kavanaugh is accused of sexual
misconduct similar to allegations made by Deborah Ramirez during his Supreme
Court confirmation hearing.
The latest and newest
allegation was completely made up and the woman who was supposedly "the
victim" said she has no recollection of any situation involving Kavanaugh.
This lie was pushed by Max Stier, a former Clinton lawyer who battled Kavanaugh
during the Whitewater scandal in the 1990s.
The
book notes, quietly, that the woman Max Stier named as having been supposedly
victimized by Kavanaugh and friends denies any memory of the alleged event.
Seems, I don’t know, significant.
NYT
Reporters’ essay about a supposed second Yale incident omitted their own book
reporting that completely undercuts it: alleged victim denies any memory of it.
Journalistically indefensible, though gullible additional reporters are
spreading it of course.
And
for the record, the Ramirez allegations also had zero evidence or credibility.
From a 400-page
report published by the Senate Judiciary Committee in November
2018 (bolding is mine):
In a
September 23, 2018, story published in
the New Yorker, Deborah
Ramirez, who attended Yale at the same time as Justice Kavanaugh,
alleged that he “exposed himself at a drunken dormitory party, thrust his penis
in her face, and caused her to touch it without her consent as she pushed him
away.” Almost immediately after its publication, the New York Times
posted a story that said its staff had
interviewed several dozen people but could
find no one to corroborate Ramirez’s account or
anyone with firsthand knowledge of the
alleged event. The Times also reported that
Ramirez, in effort to refresh her
recollection, “contacted former Yale classmates asking if
they recalled the episode and told some
of them that she could not be
certain Mr. Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself." Hours
after the New Yorker published the story,
the Committee contacted Ramirez’s attorney.
According to the article, Ramirez had investigated her claims and the
Committee asked for any evidence—including statements
from witnesses—that she had gathered to
support her allegations.
Through her attorney, she refused each of the Committee’s seven
requests for such material. The Committee also asked her to either speak
to Committee investigators or to provide a written statement directly to the
Committee, to which she also refused. Ultimately,
her attorneys agreed only to contact the FBI
to demand that she be included in
the supplemental background investigation. The FBI reportedly
interviewed Ramirez on Sunday, September 30, 2018. Despite the refusal of
Ramirez’s legal team to assist the Committee in its investigation, Committee
investigators attempted to investigate her
claims to the greatest extent possible,
and interviewed seven witnesses regarding the allegation. They
included Justice Kavanaugh’s former roommate at Yale, James
Roche, several of his college classmates,
and classmates and friends associated with Ramirez.
Committee investigators also reviewed documents submitted by several
former Yale classmates. The Committee also reviewed public statements
from three other Yale classmates but found them
immaterial because the speakers had no
knowledge of the event. Finally, Committee
investigators interviewed Justice Kavanaugh in
a transcribed phone call on September 25.
He unequivocally denied that the alleged incident ever took place.
Committee investigators
found no verifiable evidence to support Ramirez’s allegations.
After being exposed by
The Federalist's Mollie Hemingway for failing to include that the
"victim" refused to be interviewed for the book (because it didn't
happen), the NYT issued the following statement and tried to explain on
Twitter.
Editors’ Note: Sept. 15, 2019
An earlier version of
this article, which was adapted from a forthcoming book, did not include one
element of the book's account regarding an assertion by a Yale classmate that
friends of Brett Kavanaugh pushed his penis into the hand of a female student
at a drunken dorm party. The
book reports that the female student declined to be interviewed and friends say
that she does not recall the incident. That
information has been added to the article.
We
would like to address the questions we’re seeing related to a book excerpt in
today’s Sunday Review section.
The
book, “The Education of Brett Kavanaugh: An Investigation” by New York Times
reporters Robin Pogrebin and Kate Kelly, is a well-reported and newsworthy
account that reveals new details and sheds new light on a matter of significant
national interest.
The
excerpt of the book was published in the Sunday Review, a section that includes
both news analysis and opinion pieces. The section frequently runs excerpts of
books produced by Times reporters.
The
new revelations contained in the piece were uncovered during the reporting
process for the book, which is why this information did not appear in The Times
before the excerpt.
The
new revelations contained in the piece were uncovered during the reporting
process for the book, which is why this information did not appear in The Times
before the excerpt.
Oh,
and then there's this. After issuing the "correction," the NYT
continues to push the lie in a separate article.
Recommended
Cortney
O'Brien
You
know how NYT added editor's note saying Brett Kavanaugh alleged victim is said
not to recall new alleged incident from 35 years ago? Times again leaves that
out of new piece, this one about Dem calls for impeachment. ow.ly/Zi2V50wbjCm
Here's
the bottom line and the answer is no:
Question:
Would this NYT editor’s note have been published if @MZHemingway
had not gotten ahold of a copy of the book and found the passage indicating
that the alleged victim doesn’t recall the incident? I doubt it.
No comments:
Post a Comment