CAN YOU THINK OF EVEN ON THING BARACK OBAMA DID FOR BLACK
AMERICA EVEN AS HE OPERATED 'LA RAZA' OUT OF THE WHITE
HOUSE?
By the end of the speech, Obama had skillfully twisted the events to the point where theoretical, faceless white racism was to blame for the actual, documented racism of Xavier Johnson.
On a fundamental level, Obama understands that America is not the systemically racist cesspool he allowed it to be portrayed as under his watch. Yet he was Machiavellian enough to let this yarn spin itself for the purpose of political advantage.
"That phase of the takeover was started in 2008 by President Barack Obama. Throughout his eight years in office, Obama practiced divisiveness and hammered away at the Second Amendment while pouring gallons of fuel on the fire of the "Black Lives Matter" lie. His administration was rampant with corruption, pushing the envelope with every new scandal." RICK HAYES
“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.” Washington Times
“Make no mistake about it: the Latino community holds this election in your hands. Some of the closest contests this November will be in states like Florida, Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico -- states with large Latino populations.” PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA
“I know how powerful this community is. Just think how powerful you could be on November 4th if you translate your numbers into votes.” PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA
WELFARE
CHEAT BARACK OBAMA FUNDS HIS EGO TOWER off tax payers backs!
I am sure
that Obama and his friend and former chief of staff Rahm would not like to see
pols running for mayor on a platform of halting the giveaway."
But that halt to lawlessness hasn't stopped the
Windy City's politicians rushing to hand over almost 20 acres of precious
lakefront park land to the private foundation controlled by Barack and Michelle
Obama. The Obama Foundation (Obama.org) promises to build a monument
to his presidency, called the Obama Presidential Center (OPC). It
has to be called the OPC because it will not be an actual presidential library,
under the control of the National Archives, but rather a privately controlled
entity, free to focus on whatever pleases the 44th president.”
Michelle Obama castigates whites for ‘running from us’
Speaking at an event in Chicago called the “Obama Foundation Summit” (were any heads of state present?), Michelle Obama let slip her resentment of white people. The grudge goes back to her childhood, and she does not seem to see much progress in the behavior she attributes to Caucasian-Americans. Fox News reports what the New York Times doesn’t:
White Americans are “still running” elsewhere when minorities and immigrants move into their communities, Michelle Obama observed Tuesday. (snip)In a sit-down interview with journalist Isabel Wilkerson, in which Obama was accompanied by her brother, Craig Robinson, an executive with the NBA’s New York Knicks, Obama described when she first became conscious of what’s been called “white flight.”We were doing everything we were supposed to do – and better,” Obama said of her family, recalling when they got a new address on Chicago’s South Side. “But when we moved in, white families moved out.“I want to remind white folks that y’all were running from us,” she continued, according to the Chicago Sun-Times. “And you’re still running.”
This is remarkably un-self-aware, considering that the Obamas currently reside in Kalorama and Martha’s Vineyard. How many blacks live near their two mansions?
“I can’t make people not afraid of black people,” she said, according to The Hill. “I don’t know what’s going on. I can’t explain what’s happening in your head."
Maybe what’s going on in the heads of white people is the same as what was going on in Jesse Jackson’s head when he said:
“There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps... then turn around and see somebody white and feel relieved.”
It would be wonderful if black crime rates were similar to those of whites and Asians, but they aren’t. That’s is why many minorities flee from ghettos as soon as they are financially able – a group that includes Barack and Michelle Obama.
Mrs. Obama is stoking racial resentment with her remarks, an emotion that the Democrats use as part of their electoral strategy to drive black turnout.
At least her statement castigating whites is consistent with her oft-expressed position that she has “zero interest” in running for president.
Here is video of her remarks on race:
Photo credit: YouTube screen grab
Hat tip: Ed Lasky
Pollak: Barack Obama Wrote the Playbook on
Political Division
Left-wing pundits have accused President
Donald Trump of using his tweets last weekend to launch a divisive re-election
campaign.
David Axelrod, former adviser to
President Barack Obama, tweeted: “With his
deliberate, racist outburst, @realDonaldTrump wants to raise the profile of his
targets, drive Dems to defend them and make them emblematic of the entire
party. It’s a cold, hard strategy.”
That is debatable — but if so,
Axelrod should know; Obama did it first.
By 2011, Obama knew that re-election
would be difficult. The Tea Party had just led the Republicans to a historic
victory in the 2010 midterm elections, winning the House and nearly taking the
Senate. The economy was only growing sluggishly, and Obama’s stimulus had
failed to keep unemployment below eight percent, as projected. Moreover, the
passage of Obamacare had provoked a backlash against Obama’s state-centered
model of American society.
Facing a similar situation in the
mid-1990s, President Bill Clinton had “triangulated,” moving back toward the
middle, frustrating the GOP by taking up their issues, such as welfare reform.
But Obama rejected that approach.
Having watched his icon, Chicago mayor Harold Washington, settle for an
incremental approach when faced with opposition in the 1980s, only to die of a
sudden heart attack before fulfilling his potential, Obama chose the path of
hard-left policy — and divide-and-rule politics.
The first hint of his strategy
emerged during the debt ceiling negotiations in the summer of August 2011. As
Bob Woodward recounted in his book
about the crisis, The Price
of Politics, then-Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) had
wanted to reach a “grand bargain” with the president on long-term spending
cuts. But Obama blew up that agreement by demanding $400 billion in new taxes,
to his aides’ surprise. Obama wanted an opponent, not a deal. (Last week,
Boehner told Breitbart News
Tonight that Obama’s decision was his worst disappointment in
35 years of politics.)
In the fall of 2011, a new left-wing
movement, Occupy Wall Street, was launched. A mix of communists, anarchists,
and digital pranksters, the Occupy movement cast American society as a
struggle between the “99 percent” and the “one percent.”
Obama and then-House Minority
Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
embraced the movement — and failed to distance themselves from it even as
it collapsed into
violence, sexual assault, and confrontations with police.
Instead, Obama picked up on Occupy’s
themes and used them to shape his campaign.
In December 2011, Obama gave a speech at
Osawatomie, Kansas — a place steeped in radical
symbolism — at which he doubled down on his left-wing policies. He focused on
the issue of economic inequality, and attacked the idea that the free market
could lift the middle class to prosperity. “This isn’t about class warfare.
This is about the nation’s welfare,” he insisted.
Then, in the spring of 2012, Obama
made a controversial play on race. When a black teen, Trayvon Martin, was
killed in Florida during a scuffle with neighborhood watch volunteer George
Zimmerman, Al Sharprton — who was serving as an informal adviser to Obama at
the time — made the local crime story
into a national racial controversy. Obama, following Sharpton’s lead, weighed
in: “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon,” Obama said at the time.
Poll numbers suggest that race
relations, which had been improving, dropped precipitously after that. But to
Obama, it was worth it: the campaign needed to find a way to motivate minority
voters. (Vice President Joe Biden did his part, telling black voters
that GOP nominee Mitt Romney was “gonna put y’all in chains.”)
Trump is pushing a non-racial,
nationalist message. But if he actually wanted to divide America for political
gain, he could learn from the master.
Joel B.
Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He earned an A.B. in Social
Studies and Environmental Science and Public Policy from Harvard. He is a
winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. He is also the co-author
of How Trump Won: The Inside
Story of a Revolution, which is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter
at @joelpollak.
Heading for civil war
Donald Trump’s opponents are completely
unhinged. The hate and slander directed towards the president and his supporters
is off the charts. The vitriol comes not just from the Democrat party, the
media, and the world of entertainment, but also from a sizable proportion
of the federal bureaucracy and many seemingly ordinary people.
The media coordinates this campaign and
amplifies the hate at every opportunity. Media twist every event, be it
big or small, into a criticism of the president. The goal is always to present
Trump in not just an unfavorable light but to make him appear too loathsome for
polite society. And Trump is not the sole target of this demonization. It is
directed at his supporters, too.
Where will all this lead? No less
than Angelo M. Codevilla fears it could ultimately result in a bloody civil
war. And if it comes to that, there's no doubt where he places the blame.
The story of the contemporary American
Left's sponsorship of hate and violence began around 1964, when the Democrats
chose to abandon the Southern constituencies that had been its mainstay since
the time of Jefferson and Jackson. In less than a decade, the party found
itself increasingly dependent on gaining super-majorities among
blacks, upscale liberals, and constituencies of resentment in general
-- and hence on stoking their hate.
For the past half century, America's
political history has been driven by the Democrats' effort to fire up
these constituencies by denigrating the rest of America.
Codevilla notes that prominent Democrats
like Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Hillary Clinton have led millions of their
followers "to think and act as if conservatives were simply a lower level
of humanity, and should have their faces rubbed in their own inferiority."
It’s not surprising that many ordinary
followers have concluded that harassing conservatives in restaurants, airports,
and public functions is "not just permissible but praiseworthy,
and if thousands of persons who exercise power over cities, towns, and schools
have not concluded that facilitating such harassment and harm is their duty."
This is the toxic environment that the
Democrats, in conjunction with the media, have created. Has Pandora's box been
opened? Are we beyond the point of no return? Are leftists and their liberal
soulmates too obtuse not to expect that hate and violence will someday be
answered in kind? These questions are up in the air. Right now, one thing is
clear. As Yeats wrote: "The best lack all conviction while the worse
are full of passionate intensity."
Codevilla's worry about a civil war
dovetails with The Fourth Turning,: What the Cycles of History Tell
Us About American's Next Rendezvous with Destiny (1997) by William Strauss
and Neil Howe. To my reading, these authors predict a Fourth Turning Crisis
period around the years 2020-2022. Then, many things that Americans have always
taken for granted will unravel.
Just to touch on a few of the changes that
Strauss and Howe see: today's soft criminal justice system will become swift
and rough. Vagrants will be rounded up and the mentally ill recommitted.
Criminal appeals shortened and executions hastened. Pension funds will go
bust and Social Security checks become iffy. The full spectrum of society
will be under distress. All the problems will be combined into one -- the
survival of society.
Aren't the seeds already planted for a
crisis? Trust in Washington and in government institutions is at an all-time
low. Political violence is tacitly condoned and often openly encouraged by
Democratic officeholders. The political establishment encourages massive Illegal
immigration. The
mainstream media is highly partisan and corrupt beyond reform. The American
flag, the country's history, and even its nationhood are openly
despised in universities. American public schools are a disgrace despite
the money poured into them. The country is burdened by a $22 trillion
national debt to which many trillions more of unfunded government liabilities
must be added. Students owe a trillion dollars in school loans that can never
be repaid.
Someday there has to be a reckoning for
all this dysfunction. Irrespective of the election results in 2020, the time
frame of 2020-2022 sounds about the right for things to come to a head. It
would be prudent to be ready.
SCRATCH THE SURFACE OF BARACK OBAMA IS A PRO-MUSLIM,
ANTI-AMERICAN, ANTI-CHRISTIAN, ANTI-JEWISH DICTATOR IN THE MAKING FOR GLOBALIST
BANKSTERS AND BILLIONAIRES.
When
Obama found religion (or feigned the motions of doing so for future electability),
he chose out of the near 1,000 available options to
him in Chicago a church whose pastor was an outspoken anti-American,
anti-white, and anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist. For the next 20 years,
Obama and Michelle chose to sit in the pews of that swine and devour the filth
he shoveled out from the trough at his altar.
The Crisis Obama Let Go to Waste
Barack
Obama's legacy is nothing if not consequential. In his decades as
"community organizer" among Chicago's poorest, most desperate
neighborhoods, he did nothing other than perpetuate complete dependence on Big
Brother. His Affordable Care Act, and its accompanying criminal penalties
for not engaging in commerce, scythed a mile-wide berth into
the already frayed concept of a citizenry living free from government coercion.
More ominously, Obama was able to entwine his instinctive Marxism with
a vision for America's path forward in a way his predecessors had been unable
to.
The
singular cunning of Obama was his success in realigning the "victim"
hierarchy almost completely from class to race. Free citizens in a market
society can climb or descend the social ladder, but race remains a constant
throughout. Race is our most recognizable difference, no matter its
superficial nature. In the deepest recesses of our prejudices, race is
pure tribalism. And in the darkest hours of human history, at our most
trying moments, and during our most vicious wars, people of all tribes have
taken refuge not within their class, but within their race or ethnicity.
The examples of Nazi Germany, of Bosnia, of Rwanda, and of the Armenians
in Turkey are but a few examples of the horrors lifelong friends and neighbors
of the same class can inflict on one another in the name of racial identity
politics.
This
isn't to say Marxism hasn't been peddled before under the guise of racial
identity grievance. Indeed, Lenin himself was able to provoke satellite
regions like Ukraine and Kazakhstan to revolt from czarist Russia in the name
of ethnic separatism. In the United States, it has been tried repeatedly
since the 1960s. But as our nation's first (half) black president, Obama
was able sow division with absolute authority, and with minimal criticism by a
political class that either openly supported his aims or was petrified of
soliciting unsubstantiated accusations of racism.
And
sow division he did, with every chance he got.
When
Obama found religion (or feigned the motions of doing so for future
electability), he chose out of the near 1,000 available options to him in Chicago a
church whose pastor was an outspoken anti-American, anti-white, and
anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist. For the next 20 years, Obama and
Michelle chose to sit in the pews of that swine and devour the filth he
shoveled out from the trough at his altar. When asked to justify
his close association with this shameless bigot, Obama shrugged off such
concerns, comparing Wright to "an
old uncle who sometimes will say things that I don't agree with."
Obama distanced himself from Wright only when it started affecting his poll
numbers.
When
armed Black Panthers were caught threatening voters outside a Philadelphia
polling station in 2008, the Department of Justice under the Bush
administration charged (and convicted) them with violations of the Voting
Rights Act. Once in office, Obama had political appointees in the
DOJ dismiss the charges.
When
Cambridge Police (both white and black, not that it should matter) arrested his
black friend Henry Gates for disorderly conduct, Obama, after admitting that he
didn't know all the facts, stated that the police
"acted stupidly."
After
Trayvon Martin was shot by Afro-Peruvian (AKA "white Hispanic")
George Zimmerman, Obama intoned, "If I had a son,
he'd look like Trayvon." This implies that Martin was shot because
he was black, and not because he was repeatedly pummeling Zimmerman's head into
the pavement. Even Eric Holder's investigation concluded otherwise.
After
black nationalist Xavier Micah Johnson opened fire and murdered five Dallas
police officers in 2016 (as they protected a Black Lives Matter march), Obama
gave a eulogy at their funeral. The eulogy itself stands as perhaps one
of the most despicable moments of the Obama presidency. He used the
podium to equate the murder of the
Dallas police officers with the recent shootings of Alton Sterling and Philando
Castile (both of which were investigated and found justifiable, and neither man
was "unfairly targeted" because he was black, as Obama asserted).
It
was a speech as deft as it was cynical. Reading through the text, one
realizes more clearly the manipulation taking place that, when spoken, is less
detectable. He subtly but unmistakably steers the speech from a tribute
to the murdered officers to a damning indictment of our alleged systemic
racism, coupled with a defense of the paranoid style of the Black Lives Matter
movement. By the end of the speech, Obama had skillfully twisted the
events to the point where theoretical, faceless white racism was to blame for
the actual, documented racism of Xavier Johnson.
One
wonders if, had he attended Sterling's funeral, he would have lectured the
audience about murdered police.
At
this point, I must interject a side note regarding the aforementioned
shootings. Philando Castile was shot in a horrible case of mistaken identity. He closely
matched the description of a suspect from a recent armed robbery, and the
officer thought he was reaching for a gun he admitted to having. Alton
Sterling (who had a long arrest record that included
battery, burglary, and weapons charges) was shot because he was physically
fighting with police, despite being tasered several times. Police shot
him when he reached for the loaded .38 caliber revolver in his pants. His
shooting was completely warranted, and Baton Rouge is a safer place without
him. Neither the tragic shooting of Castile nor the justified shooting of
Sterling can in any reasonable way be attributed to racism, nor can they be
remotely likened to the premeditated slaughter of the five Dallas
officers. But such are the dots that Obama connected to hustle his race
narrative.
Obama
is notoriously thin-skinned to criticism, or to the suggestion that someone,
somewhere, might be smarter than he. This is the guy who claimed, with a straight face,
that he was a better speechwriter than his speechwriters, more knowledgeable
about policy than his policy directors, and a better political director than
his political director. Still, one assumes he was adroit enough to recognize
that objections to his policies, or questions of their constitutionality, were
not the default reactions of repressed racism. If he had thought they
were, he would have said so. On a fundamental level, Obama understands
that America is not the systemically racist cesspool he allowed it to be
portrayed as under his watch. Yet he was Machiavellian enough to let this
yarn spin itself for the purpose of political advantage.
Obama
also understood the political pitfalls inherent in hiding behind the race card
in efforts to deflect policy debates he could not win. So he did one
better. He let his media sycophants do it for him. For the duration
of his presidency and beyond, these shrieking curs claw the flesh off their
faces at the slightest hint of criticism of Obama, his policies, or his style
of governance. I am unaware of a single instance in which he publicly
censured his groupies for their utter lack of nuance.
Therein
lies the biggest tragedy of Obama's legacy. As a biracial president, he
had a foot in both black and white America. He was uniquely positioned to
use this to the advantage of the entire country, to serve as a bridge of
healing and progress between races who have butted heads for far too long.
Instead, for eight continuous years, he chose to do the exact
opposite. He entrenched identity politics as deeply as he could, ripping
open wounds in the process, and divided this great nation perhaps past the
point of no return. He did this to spread a thoroughly debunked ideology,
the achievability of which his ego will never allow him to
admit he was mistaken about.
In
a 2008 speech in which Obama attempted to justify Jeremiah Wright's irrational
hatred, he said, "At times, that
anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to
make up for a politician's own failings." Never before has a poker
player so inadvertently revealed his own hand. When Obama spoke those
words, he was no doubt doing what he does best: thinking of himself.
Malia,
Michelle, Barack and the College Admissions Scandal https://globalistbarackobama.blogspot.com/2019/03/malia-michelle-barack-and-college.html
*
Michelle was the next to attend Harvard, in her case Harvard
Law School. “Told by counselors that her SAT scores and her grades weren’t good
enough for an Ivy League school,” writes Christopher Andersen in Barack and
Michelle, “Michelle applied to Princeton and Harvard anyway.”
GOOGLE WHAT THE OBOMB DID FOR HIS SAUDIS
PAYMASTERS
Barack Obama’s back door, however, was unique to him. Before
prosecutors send some of the dimmer Hollywood stars to the slammer for their
dimness, they might want to ask just how much influence a Saudi billionaire
peddled to get Obama into Harvard.
“Of course,
one of the main reasons the nation is now “divided, resentful and angry”
is because race-baiting, Islamist, class warrior Barack Hussein
Obama was president for eight long years." MATTHEW VADUM
MICHELLE OBAMA ANNOUNCES SHE WILL RUN FOR THE WHITE HOUSE AND
BE BARACK’S THIRD TERM FOR LIFE.
MEXICO WILL ELECT HER!
The
main objective of “political animals” like Obama and the Clintons is to get
elected; it’s not to fix a broken America, nor to protect her. There are people
who govern and there are people who campaign; Obama and the Clintons are the
latter. Just look at the huge Republican electoral gains under Obama and the
Clintons. It’s amazing that Democrats who still care about their party still
support the very people who have brought it down.
“Of course, one of the main reasons the nation is now “divided, resentful and angry” is because race-baiting, Islamist, class warrior Barack Hussein Obama was president for eight long years. MATTHEW VADUM
“Of course, one of the main reasons the nation is now “divided, resentful and angry” is because race-baiting, Islamist, class warrior Barack Hussein Obama was president for eight long years. MATTHEW VADUM
Editorial Reviews: Obama
Is Making You Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
GET THIS BOOK!
Obamanomics: How Barack
Obama Is Bankrupting You and Enriching His Wall Street Friends, Corporate
Lobbyists, and Union Bosses
BY TIMOTHY P CARNEY
Editorial Reviews
Obama Is Making You
Poorer—But Who’s Getting Rich?
Goldman Sachs, GE, Pfizer, the United Auto Workers—the same
“special interests” Barack Obama was supposed to chase from the temple—are
profiting handsomely from Obama’s Big Government policies that crush taxpayers,
small businesses, and consumers. In Obamanomics, investigative
reporter Timothy P. Carney digs up the dirt the mainstream media ignores and
the White House wishes you wouldn’t see. Rather than Hope and Change, Obama is
delivering corporate socialism to America, all while claiming he’s battling
corporate America. It’s corporate welfare and regulatory robbery—it’s
OBAMANOMICS TO SERVE THE RICH AND GLOBALIST BILLIONAIRES.
No comments:
Post a Comment