THESE SHITBAGS WILL DESTROY AMERICA AND STILL BE SUCKING IN THEIR BRIBES!
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and
Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with
third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by
its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan AMERICAN THINKER.com
Donald Trump Questions Nancy Pelosi’s Corruption
1:23
President Donald Trump questioned House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s dubious participation in stock market initial public offering shares, enriching her family.
The president shared a clip Monday highlighting a CBS 60 Minutes report featuring author and Breitbart senior contributor Peter Schweizer’s investigation into Pelosi and her husband participating in at least eight different stock IPOs while in Congress.
"The House gone rogue! I want to remind you a little bit about the ring leader in this whole rogue operation against the President of the United States..." @MarkLevinShow
60 Minutes reporter Steve Kroft confronted Pelosi on the topic in 2011, but she denied any impropriety.
The report noted that Pelosi and her husband participated in an initial public offering of Visa in 2008, while credit card regulation was underway in the House of Representatives. The Pelosis bought 5,000 shares at the initial price of $44 and shares were trading at $64 just two days later, according to the report.
“Congress has never done more for consumers nor has the Congress passed more critical reforms of the credit card industry than under the Speakership of Nancy Pelosi,” Pelosi spokesman, Drew Hammill, said in a statement, according to CNN after the 60 Minutes report aired.
The clip was featured on Mark Levin’s Fox News show Life, Liberty and Levin on Sunday.
Turns out Biden's family not the only one to benefit from
Ukrainian fossil fuels
On Sept. 24, 2019, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced the official
impeachment inquiry that would be led by
the Intelligence Committee and Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). At
first, this was a curious decision to objective persons, since the Judiciary
Committee has the authority over this type of procedure. At the time,
Pelosi indicated a threat by President Donald Trump to our national security
during the July 25 conversation between him and President Zelensky of
Ukraine. She did this without the benefit of the transcript, but she
doubtless already knew much of the CIA "whistleblower's" complaint. Further,
the Ukrainian
president disputes her version.
But this is not the rationale for her haste to convene the
investigation. It appears that the D.C. swamp benefits another
powerful family. The Biden family has
gotten special treatment from Ukrainian oil interests, and the Pelosi family
has a similar advantage. Paul Pelosi, Jr. was a board member of
Viscoil and an executive at its related company NRGLab, which was involved in
energy business in Ukraine. Perhaps the use of the Intelligence
Committee has given the Democrats the opportunity to limit Republican
questioning and maintain secrecy over the responses from subpoenaed
witnesses. This would prevent any official record implicating
Pelosi's son. This also explains her
reluctance to take a vote authorizing the investigation, since the minority
party would gain some rights.
This is interesting also since much of the Democratic Party
rejects carbon-based energy sources. Biden has made this a part of
his campaign. The Green New Deal proposals will eventually end
dependency on oil and gas as an energy source. But this does not
stop these politicos from benefiting financially from this sector of the
economy. This reminds one of the financial benefits that Al Gore's
father had from Occidental Petroleum, which was one of the great polluters
(remember Love Canal?). He chose to make money selling carbon
offsets to atone and make his own name.
The Ukrainian oil company Burisma used
many well connected members of the D.C. establishment connected to the Obama
administration. This interlocking swamp is a threat to the
USA. But the media have managed to convince a vast number of
Americans that Trump is the threat. When Trump railed against Pelosi
in Louisiana on Friday, he was accusing her of not just splitting the nation
politically, but also ignoring the financial benefits to powerful families at
the detriment of our national security. This also helps explain the
constant discussion in public about Biden's son Hunter, in addition to the
political advantage he might gain.
No wonder the establishment (including many Republicans) wants to
impeach Trump. Family security always "trumps" national
security in the D.C. swamp.
Pelosi - Illegals - Sunkist - Her investments!
Pelosi's corrupt insider
passing of bills that make her rich.
Check for yourself
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home House
District includes San Francisco.
Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San
Francisco, Pelosi's home district.
Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a
major contributor to Pelosi.
Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa
employing 75% of the Samoan workforce.
Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 million
dollars of Star-Kist stock.
In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was
increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the
increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make
Del Monte products less expensive than their competition's.
Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed,
Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an
"economic development credit in American Samoa".
Check some more for yourself
Conservative Activist Jumps Pelosi's Fence With
Illegal Aliens to Prove a Vital Point
Conservative activist Laura Loomer, who is known for going undercover
with James O'Keefe, took alleged illegal aliens from Mexico and Guatemala to
Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home in California. There, the group jumped the fence
and Loomer demanded the group be let into the home. The group set up a pop up
tent with the word "morality" on it and hung the pictures of those
who were killed by illegal aliens, The Daily Caller reported.
NANCY PELOSI GOT RICH OFF ELECTED OFFICE AND SERVICING THE
“CHEAP” LABOR LOBBIES - Jim Gilchrist asked the question about Nancy Pelosi’s
ethics that should be on the minds of every law-abiding American – including
those immigrants who are following the law to become citizens here the proper
way: “Do we really need a House Speaker whose every action is calculated to
enhance her own financial interests, instead of focusing on how porous borders
will affect the security of everyday American citizens?”
SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI HIRES ILLEGALS AT HER NAPA WINERY
CALL LA RAZA NANCY TODAY! PUT THE HEAT ON HER!
EMAIL: NANCY PELOSI
CALL NANCY PELOSI Washington , DC - (202) 225-4965 San
Francisco , CA - (415) 556-4862
Gilchrist was reacting to my report several weeks ago in
FrontPage Magazine that Pelosi – who owns non-union vineyards in Napa Valley
where grape-picking depends chiefly on the availability of cheap foreign labor
– is doing everything she can to help open the floodgates to more illegal
immigration. And she wants the American taxpayers to pay their way. As even
more proof of this
than I previously reported, Pelosi does not want employers
like her to be required to pay the cost of illegal aliens’ hospital care. She
voted against a bill that would make employers liable for the reimbursements if
an undocumented employee seeks medical attention. And she voted in favor of
rewarding illegal aliens from Mexico with Social Security benefits.
Pelosi's Stake in Illegal Immigration
________________________________________
The Minuteman Project, founded by Jim Gilchrist (who is also
the co-author of the book Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America’s Borders),
is made up of citizen volunteers who watch our border with Mexico and report
illegal entry to the border patrol. For performing that thankless task in full
compliance with the law, Gilchrist and his colleagues have been falsely
maligned as fascists, racists, and even murderers. They have been driven off
the speaker’s platform at Columbia University and vilified by Leftist
politicians and their handmaidens in the liberal press.
So it was no surprise that the mainstream media chose to
ignore a recent press release, issued by his publisher, in which Gilchrist
asked the question about Nancy Pelosi’s ethics that should be on the minds of
every law-abiding American – including those immigrants who are following the
law to become citizens here the proper way: “Do we really need a House Speaker
whose every action is calculated to enhance her own financial interests,
instead of focusing on how porous borders will affect the security of everyday
American citizens?”
Gilchrist did not stop there. He demanded an investigation
into Pelosi’s “economic stake in just the kind of illegal alien exploitation
that we deplore in Minutemen.” But you would never know it from the liberal
media, who - while ignoring this demand - have had no compunctions in calling
for Speaker Hastert’s head in the wake of the Foley page controversy.
Gilchrist was reacting to my report several weeks ago in
FrontPage Magazine that Pelosi – who owns non-union vineyards in Napa Valley
where grape-picking depends chiefly on the availability of cheap foreign labor
– is doing everything she can to help open the floodgates to more illegal
immigration. And she wants the American taxpayers to pay their way. As even
more proof of this than I previously reported, Pelosi does not want employers
like her to be required to pay the cost of illegal aliens’ hospital care. She
voted against a bill that would make employers liable for the reimbursements if
an undocumented employee seeks medical attention. And she voted in favor of
rewarding illegal aliens from Mexico with Social Security benefits.
At the same time, Pelosi has led the Democratic opposition to
any effective border controls or documentation requirements. She opposed the
Secure Fence Act of 2006, signed into law by President Bush, and voted against
final passage of a border security and enforcement bill in 2005 which required
that all businesses must use an electronic system to check if all new hires
have the legal right to work in this country. She voted against a bill to bar
drivers' licenses for illegal aliens in 2005. This year she opposed legislation
requiring presentation of a legitimate government-issued photo ID to prove
eligibility to vote, claiming that “there is little evidence anywhere in the
country of a significant problem with non-citizen voters.” She is dead wrong.
For example, an accused terrorist by the name of Nuradin Abdi was just recently
reported to have illegally registered to vote at the Ohio Bureau of Motor
Vehicles. Nuradin Abdi was indicted earlier this year as part of a conspiracy
to blow up the Columbus Mall.
How many other terrorist suspects may have slipped through
the system because Leftists like Pelosi oppose any meaningful screens? Instead
she continues to advocate our recognition of the flimsy, non-validated ID card
that the Mexican consulates provide to illegal aliens before they cross over
our border, called the “matricula consular”, which gives them phony
documentation to set up bank accounts, apply for jobs, obtain social benefits,
board airplanes, identify themselves to police, enter buildings that require
IDs, obtain drivers’ licenses and then perhaps use those drivers’ licenses to
try to illegally register to vote in our elections.
Pelosi also believes in giving sanctuary to illegal aliens.
She opposed legislation to deny federal homeland security funding to state and
local governments who refuse to share information they learn about an
individual's immigration status with Federal immigration authorities. Pelosi’s
hometown of San Francisco is one of the sanctuary cities she voted to protect
for the benefit of illegal aliens. Pelosi even voted against strengthening our
immigration law with regard to the deportability of alien terrorists.
Jim Gilchrist cut to the chase with this devastating
observation that the mainstream media does not want you to read:
"As we’ve shown again and again in ‘Minutemen,’ the
Democrats aren’t just hypocrites, but are working actively to subvert our
legislative system to their own ends. Their only goal is votes, votes and more
votes, no matter where they come from, no matter if they’re cast legally, no matter
whether the person casting them is dead, alive, a citizen or an illegal
alien."
Pelosi sees Jim Gilchrist’s Minutemen Project as a threat to
her pro-illegal alien agenda. More illegal aliens mean more votes for the
Democrats and more grape-pickers for Napa Valley vineyards like hers. So she
even voted against a measure that would have cut off the use of U.S. taxpayers’
funds to tip off illegal aliens as to where the Minutemen citizen patrols may
be located! She obviously wants to see the Minutemen put out of business –
permanently. She can count on the liberal press to distort the work of the
Minutemen and to keep out of the public eye Gilchrist’s pointed questions about
her motivations for helping illegal aliens during the run-up to the mid-term elections
that may make her the next Speaker of the House.
Gilchrist, of course, is accustomed to being vilified and
prevented by the Left from getting his message out. In early October, he was
prevented from finishing his speech at the "Minutemen Forum" sponsored
by the Columbia College Republicans. Gilchrist had spoken for just a few
minutes and managed to utter the words “I love the First Amendment” when a
group of radical protestors took the stage and interrupted him, displaying a
big banner saying "There are no illegals." More protestors then
stormed the stage. Chaos erupted and the audience members who had come to hear
Gilchrist speak never got the chance, which was precisely the protestors’
objective. As reported online by the staff of Columbia’s undergraduate
newspaper, “a mosh pit of triumphal students and community members danced and
chanted outside, "Asian, Black, Brown and White, we smashed the Minutemen
tonight!" They also put out a statement declaring:
“The Minutemen are not a legitimate voice in the debate on
immigration. They are a racist, armed militia who have declared open hunting
season on immigrants, causing countless hate crimes and over 3000 deaths on the
border. Why should exploitative corporations have free passes between nations,
but individual people not? No human being is illegal.” (Emphasis added)
We have come to the point in this country where a bunch of
radical protestors get to decide who is and who is not a legitimate voice in
the debate on as critical a public policy issue as immigration. Such Leftists
think that migration in a borderless world is a basic human right. They want no
barriers, no guards, and no proof of lawful residency. They certainly do not
want the Minutemen watching the border and reporting illegal entry to the
authorities.
Leftist slogans like “no human being is illegal” are red
herrings. It is not the human being who is illegal; it is what the human being
does that may be illegal. One’s conduct is the test, not simply who one is.
Immigrants who follow our rules are welcome here. Those who do not abide by our
laws have no right to be here. A person who breaks into your house without your
permission does not deserve room, board and a job as a reward, even if the
intruder may be much poorer than you. He has broken the law and deserves to be
punished for what he has done. Our country’s boundaries and rules for entry and
residency similarly define who is permitted to be here and how we choose to
protect ourselves. We are a land of immigrants, but we are also a land of laws
with certain core values. Those seeking to enter our country and remain here
must learn to accommodate to our laws and values, not the other way around.
That is the way prior generations of immigrants did it, including those who passed
through Ellis Island. Why should the law be thrown aside now?
What we are witnessing is a frontal challenge to our nation’s
sovereignty. Mexico’s Foreign Secretary wants to drag us before the United
Nations for intending to build a fence on our side of the border with our money
to keep out aliens who seek to enter our country illegally. They will probably
get a sympathetic ear as some UN bureaucrats believe there should be no such
thing as “illegal” immigrants in the first place. For the first time in our
history, Americans are being asked to cede the right to decide how we define
ourselves as a nation and protect our own borders to a globalist governance
body. Will Pelosi lead her liberal loyalists as House Speaker to support the UN
against America’s right to control its own borders? Do we really want to risk
finding out?
It is high time, as Jim Gilchrist demanded in the press
release ignored by the mainstream media, that Pelosi come clean under oath as
to her personal stake in the illegal immigration issue before she can do even
more damage as House Speaker.
Schweizer:
Biden Needs to Address Ukraine Accusations ‘Front and Center’
11 Oct 201910
1:18
Breitbart
News senior contributor Peter Schweizer, author of “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class Hides
Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends,” on Friday
stressed the importance of 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden
addressing the Ukraine issue involving him and his son, Hunter.
Schweizer said the former vice
president needs to address his family’s dealings in Ukraine “front and center”
rather than ignoring because polling indicates most people believe it needs
further investigation.
“[Hunter Biden] has been radio
silent, and I think if you look at the way the Bidens have handled this issue,
it’s been to not answer any questions, which I think just raises further
suspicions,” Schweizer told Fox News Channel’s “America’s
Newsroom.” “Hunter Biden is somewhere, allegedly in California hiding out,
and Joe Biden won’t answer any questions on this. He gets angry.”
“I think at some point they’re going
to have to address these issues front and center because as it stands right
now, polls indicate that most people believe this needs further investigation
and needs to be looked at,” he added.
No comments:
Post a Comment