MEX MURDERS MOTHER IN PELOSI, FEINSTEIN, KAMALA
HARRIS, GAVIN NEWSOM'S ! SANCTUARY ! CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO!
Steinle’s
murderer, Jose Zarate and been deported 5xs!
"While walking with her father on a pier
in San Francisco in 2015, Steinle was shot by the illegal alien. Steinle
pleaded with her father to not let her die, but she soon passed in her father’s
arms."
In the last two years, ICE officers made 266,000 arrests of aliens with criminal records, including those charged or convicted of 100,000 assaults, 30,000 s ex crimes, and 4,000 violent killings. Over the years, thousands of Americans have been brutally killed by those who illegally entered our country, and thousands more lives will be lost if we don't act right now.
STEALING AMERICA!
Here’s how California surrendered to Mexico… OR WAS HANDED TO
MEXICO BY NANCY PELOSI, DIANNE FEINSTEIN, KAMALA HARRIS, JERRY BROWN and GAVIN
NEWSOM!
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/08/california-under-mex-occupation-do-not.html
THIS IS WHAT THE
DEMOCRAT PARTY OF CORRUPTION AND OPEN BORDERS HAS DONE TO ONE CITY!
SANCTUARY CITY SAN FRANSISCO
AMERICA’S DUMPSTER CITY OF FILTH AND DRUG DEALERS
HOME TO SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN, SENATOR KAMALA
HARRIS, REP. NANCY PELOSI and GAVEN NEWSOM
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/10/monica-showalter-sanctuary-city-san.html
“It’s almost impossible
to get convicted in this city,” said [Sgt. Kevin] Healy, who works in the
Police Department’s narcotics division. “The message needs to be sent that
it’s not OK to be selling drugs. It’s not allowed anywhere else. Where else can
you walk up to someone you don’t know and purchase crack and heroin? Is there
such a place?”…
Police say drug dealers
from the East Bay ride BART into San Francisco every day to prey on the
addicts slumped on our sidewalks, and yet the city that claims to
so desperately want to help those addicts often looks the other way.
Steinle’s
murderer, Jose Zarate and been deported 5xs!
"While walking with her father on a pier
in San Francisco in 2015, Steinle was shot by the illegal alien. Steinle
pleaded with her father to not let her die, but she soon passed in her father’s
arms."
THE STAGGERING COST OF THE WELFARE STATE MEXICO AND
THE LA RAZA SUPREMACY DEMOCRAT PARTY HAVE BUILT BORDER to OPEN BORDER’
According to the Federation
for American Immigration Reform’s 2017 report, illegal
immigrants, and their children, cost American taxpayers a net $116 billion
annually -- roughly $7,000 per alien annually. While high, this number is not
an outlier: a recent study by the Heritage
Foundation found that low-skilled immigrants
(including those here illegally) cost Americans trillions over the course of their
lifetimes, and a study from the National
Economics Editorial found that illegal immigration
costs America over $140 billion annually. As it stands, illegal immigrants are
a massive burden on American taxpayers.
CNN Fantasizes About Mike Pence Getting Caught up in Impeachment, ‘President Pelosi’
2:43
As House Democrats seek to progress their efforts Thursday to impeach President Donald Trump, CNN is speculating whether one unintended consequence could see Vice President Mike Pence also sidelined, leaving the way clear for Nancy Pelosi to take the reins of office.
The fantasy outcome is contained in an opinion piece by Paul Callan, a contributor and CNN legal analyst.
He speculates Trump and Pence could possibly both be drawn into the Ukraine inquiry, leaving the way clear under constitutional law for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to ascend the White House steps as Commander-in-Chief. He writes:
What might follow could be a double impeachment scenario that would make heads spin and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi the president of the United States. After Pence, she’s next in the line of succession.
He then immediately concedes this may be just a dream because if Trump and Pence were both implicated in the scandal and Pence’s resignation or removal from office occurred first, “Trump could nominate a new vice president under the 25th Amendment.”
This is not the first time left-wing commentators have sought to elevate Nancy Pelosi to the highest office in the land.
Last month the Washington Post examined the same possible scenario in an opinion piece. It stated:
What happens when a Democratic speaker of the House — second in line to the presidency, according to the Presidential Succession Act of 1947 — is suddenly thrust into the Oval Office, succeeding a Republican president and vice president who resign, embroiled in scandal?
Such a scenario is attracting attention — #PresidentPelosi was trending on social media after last week’s announcement of an impeachment inquiry — even though it may seem far-fetched that President Trump and Vice President Pence would be forced from office over abuse of power related to the administration’s dealings with Ukraine or other misdeeds.
The writers, Robert Atkins and Adam Frankel, noted it remains “far-fetched” that Trump and Pence could be forced from office over “abuse of power related to the administration’s dealings with Ukraine or other misdeeds” but they did not rule it out, as Breitbart News reported.
The column writers compared Democrats’ current move to impeach the president to when former Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned amidst charges of tax evasion, which left the office of the vice president temporarily vacant in 1973. At that time, if President Richard Nixon were to have resigned or been impeached, House Speaker Carl Albert (D-OK) would have assumed the presidency.
Walters: California Paradox:
Economy–and poverty–hit record highs
California’s median income rose to among the nation’s
highest in 2018, but it ranked 50th in housing
Democrats turning California into
a third-world hellhole: Going without electricity edition
Democrats are turning California into a third-world hellhole
without electricity, water, and freedom.
Due to Democrats' love
for trees, at least 800,000 Californians will be without power for several
days. Instead of properly managing California forests to reduce the
chances of big fires, Democrats are saying Californians have to go without
lights, refrigerators, and air-conditioning. Democrats could also
avoid this by not making the power company financially liable for all forest
fire damages, but since PG&E is a company, not an illegal alien, the
Democrats couldn't care less about doing what's best for California.
While they try to blame
climate change and the infrastructure, the reality is that neither of those has
caused any significant changes in the last ten years — but now, suddenly, due
to Democrat policies, Californians have to start living in the 18th century.
The Democrats who run
California also refuse to build more water storage capacity even though the
state's population has dramatically increased, ensuring that water has to be
rationed during droughts.
Democrats are turning
California into a third-world country economically. The income
inequality between the über-rich Silicon Valley workers and the rest of
Californians is huge, just like in third-world countries, while the elites live
in luxury and the rest live in squalor.
Democrats are doing a
great job manufacturing poverty and homelessness even as they fail to instill
hope in Californians.
California has four times more homeless per
capita and three times more poor per capita than the rest of
America. Half the homeless in America are in California, even though
California has only 12% of the U.S. population. Also, blacks are six
times more prevalent in the San
Francisco homeless population than they are in California in general.
The homeless explosion
has brought the return of third-world diseases like typhus to California — not
to mention streets littered with human feces.
Democrats are trying to
keep people from having cars, just like the people of the Third
World. After all, a car gives people the freedom to move, and
freedom is a bad thing in the minds of Democrats since it limits the power the
government has over citizens.
Recently, Gavin Newsom,
the Democrat governor, transferred millions of dollars that the voters had been
ensured would go to improve the state's failing road infrastructure to a fund
designed to convince Californians to give up their cars.
Democrats are also
working to make cars unaffordable for any but the richest Californians.
Californians pay $1.53 more for a gallon for
gasoline than the rest of America. That's $21 more for a tank of
gasoline. Facebook employees won't notice it, but the poor in
California who can't afford to live near their jobs are paying through the
teeth.
Like all third-world
tyrants, Democrats are doing everything they can to eliminate democracy in
California.
The jungle primary, where
the top two candidates in the primaries go against each other, has resulted in
many races where two Democrats are running against each other, giving voters
who don't agree with the Democrats' failed policies no one to vote for.
California is doing
nothing to ensure that people who shouldn't vote don't
vote. Instead, the people running the state are doing everything
possible to let illegal aliens vote. When illegal aliens go pick up
their driver's licenses, they're automatically enrolled to vote unless they say
they're not citizens.
California is also trying
to end democracy by keeping the Republican presidential candidate off the
ballot. Democrats passed an unconstitutional law to keep any
candidate who didn't release his tax returns off the ballot solely to keep
Californians from voting for Trump.
Finally, the Democrats
are going after freedom of the press. An undercover journalist
revealed that Planned Parenthood was selling aborted baby
parts. Instead of investigating that illegal practice, Democrat
Kamala Harris decided to put the journalist on trial.
Democrats keep telling us
California is the future if they get elected. That means that
poverty, homelessness, the end of democracy, and a press that reports only what
Democrats want heard are what Democrats are promising us.
If you're an immensely
wealthy Google employee, California is Heaven. If you're not, it's
becoming more and more like Hell.
You can read more of Tom's rants at his blog, Conversations
about the obvious, and feel free to follow him on Twitter.
Income
inequality is on the rise in California. In some Bay Area counties, the
disparities are extreme.
An
analysis of census data found a growing gap between rich and poor
By ERICA HELLERSTEIN | ehellerstein@bayareanewsgroup.com |
PUBLISHED: October 7, 2019 at 5:00 am | UPDATED: October 7,
2019 at 8:44 am
California is the Golden State — at least for those at the
top of the income scale. For everyone else, the nickname may apply more to the
sun than to money.
That’s one takeaway of a recent analysis of U.S.Census Bureau
data by the California Budget and Policy Center (CBPC), which found a widening
gap between the state’s haves and have-nots.
The CBPC analysis found major gains for California’s richest
residents, modest gains for people with median incomes, and losses for the
lowest income earners when adjusted for inflation.
Median household income in California, the CBPC reported,
increased by 6.4%, from $70,744 in 2006 to $75,277 in 2018, adjusting for
inflation. But for the top 5% of households, income grew by 18.6%, from
$426,851 in 2006 to $506,421 in 2018, while households in the bottom 20% saw
their average income fall by 5.3%, from $16,441 in 2006 to $15,562 in 2018. The
analysis was based on the census agency’s latest American Community Survey
report.
An increasing gap between rich and poor is not unique to
California, as recent data from the U.S. Census Bureau show. From 2017 to 2018,
the data indicate, income inequality also widened in eight other states,
including Alabama, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Virginia and New Mexico, although
in most other states it remained constant. Income inequality is typically
measured through the Gini Index, which assigns a score of 0 to indicate perfect
wealth distribution within a population and a score of 1 to represent total
inequality. In 2018, the overall Gini Index for the U.S. was .485, which was
“significantly higher” than its 2017 estimate of .482, the Bureau reported.
The trends in California are especially concerning, said Sara
Kimberlin, senior policy analyst at CBPC, given the increases in the cost of
living across the state. From 2006 to 2017, the organization found,
inflation-adjusted median rent increased by 16% statewide, while median hourly
wages for workers fell by half a percent.
“So that’s where the real challenge is that California has to
face,” Kimberlin said. “We have two trends moving at the same time: Incomes
remaining relatively flat for people in the middle and at the bottom of the
income range, while the cost of living is going up.”
In the Bay Area, where the cost of housing has become a topic
of national conversation, those tensions are felt acutely, said Megan Joseph,
executive director of Rise Together, a regional coalition aimed at reducing
poverty in the Bay Area.
The average income for top earners in many Bay Area counties
in 2018 was even higher than the state average for the richest households,
according to census data. And San Francisco County had the widest income
disparity, with the top 5% of households making an average of $808,105,
compared with $16,184 for the lowest 20%.
In San Mateo County, the richest earned $810,917 in 2018,
while the bottom fifth collected $25,039. Alameda County reflected the
statewide average more closely, with those at the top earning $539,883 and the
bottom, $20,041. The CBPC report on the increasing income gap in the state,
released on Sept. 26, did not include figures for individual counties.
“The Bay Area feels the income inequalities and the disparity
between the numbers at the top and the stagnant wages at the bottom more than
most other areas of California because of the cost of living,” Joseph said.
Alongside rising inequality, the data also showed high levels
of poverty among Californians. An earlier analysis of census data from CBPC in
September — based on the so-called supplemental poverty measure, which takes
into account the cost of housing and other expenses — found that roughly 7.1
million people each year could not afford basic expenses between 2016 and 2018.
OPEN BORDERS: IT’S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED!
"In the decade following the financial crisis of
2007-2008, the capitalist class has delivered powerful blows to the social
position of the working class. As a result, the working class in the US, the
world’s “richest country,” faces levels of economic hardship not seen since the
1930s."
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-class-war-over-paying-living-wages.html
"Inequality has reached unprecedented levels: the wealth
of America’s three richest people now equals the net worth of the poorest half
of the US population."
Report:
California’s Middle-Class Wages Rise by 1 Percent in 40 Years
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
NEIL MUNRO
3 Sep 2019172
6:24
Middle-class wages in progressive California have risen by 1
percent in the last 40 years, says a study by the establishment California
Budget and Policy Center.
“Earnings for California’s workers at the low end and middle
of the wage scale have generally declined or stagnated for decades,” says the
report, titled “California’s Workers Are Increasingly Locked Out of the State’s
Prosperity.” The report continued:
In 2018, the median hourly earnings for workers ages 25 to 64
was $21.79, just 1% higher than in 1979, after adjusting for inflation ($21.50,
in 2018 dollars) (Figure 1). Inflation-adjusted hourly earnings for low-wage
workers, those at the 10th percentile, increased only slightly more, by 4%,
from $10.71 in 1979 to $11.12 in 2018.
The report admits that the state’s progressive economy is
delivering more to investors and less to wage-earners. “Since 2001, the share
of state private-sector [annual new income] that has gone to worker
compensation has fallen by 5.6 percentage points — from 52.9% to 47.3%.”
In 2016, California’s Gross Domestic Product was $2.6
trillion, so the 5.6 percent drop shifted $146 billion away from wages. That is
roughly $3,625 per person in 2016.
The report notes that wages finally exceeded 1979 levels
around 2017, and it splits the credit between the Democrats’ minimum-wage
boosts and President Donald Trump’s go-go economy.
The 40 years of flat wages are partly hidden by a wave of new
products and services. They include almost-free entertainment and information
on the Internet, cheap imported coffee in supermarkets, and reliable,
low-pollution autos in garages.
But the impact of California’s flat wages is made worse by
California’s rising housing costs, the report says, even though it also ignores
the rent-spiking impact of the establishment’s pro-immigration policies:
In just the last
decade alone, the increase in the typical household’s rent far outpaced the
rise in the typical full-time worker’s annual earnings, suggesting that working
families and individuals are finding it increasingly difficult to make ends
meet. In fact, the basic cost of living in many parts of the state is more than
many single individuals or families can expect to earn, even if all adults are
working full-time.
…
Specifically, inflation-adjusted median household rent rose
by 16% between 2006 and 2017, while inflation-adjusted median annual earnings
for individuals working at least 35 hours per week and 50 weeks per year rose
by just 2%, according to a Budget Center analysis of US Census Bureau, American
Community Survey data.
The wage and housing
problems are made worse — especially for families — by the loss of employment
benefits as companies and investors spike stock prices by cutting costs. The
report says:
Many workers are being paid little more today than workers
were in 1979 even as worker productivity has risen. Fewer employees have access
to retirement plans sponsored by their employers, leaving individual workers on
their own to stretch limited dollars and resources to plan how they’ll spend
their later years affording the high cost of living and health care in
California. And as union representation has declined, most workers today cannot
negotiate collectively for better working conditions, higher pay, and benefits,
such as retirement and health care, like their parents and grandparents did. On
top of all this, workers who take on contingent and independent work (often referred
to as “gig work”), which in many cases appears to be motivated by the need to
supplement their primary job or fill gaps in their employment, are rarely
granted the same rights and legal protections as traditional employees.
The center’s report tries to blame the four-decade stretch of
flat wages on the declining clout of unions. But unions’ decline was impacted
by the bipartisan elites’ policy of mass-migration and imposed diversity.
In 2018, Breitbart reported how Progressives for Immigration
Reform interviewed Blaine Taylor, a union carpenter, about the economic impact
of migration:
TAYLOR: If I hired a framer to do a small addition [in 1988],
his wage would have been $45 an hour. That was the minimum for a framing
contractor, a good carpenter. For a helper, it was about $25 an hour, for a
master who could run a complete job, it was about $45 an hour. That was the
going wage for plumbers as well. His helpers typically got $25 an hour.
…
Now, the average wage in Los Angeles for construction workers
is less than $11 an hour. They can’t go lower than the minimum wage. And much
of that, if they’re not being paid by the hour at less than $11 an hour,
they’re being paid per piece — per piece of plywood that’s installed, per piece
of drywall that’s installed. Now, the subcontractor can circumvent paying them
as an hourly wage and are now being paid by 1099, which means that no taxes are
being taken out. [Emphasis added]
Diversity also damaged the unions by shredding California’s
civic solidarity. In 2007, the progressive Southern Poverty Law Center posted a
report with the title “Latino Gang Members in Southern California are
Terrorizing and Killing Blacks.” In the same year, an op-ed in the Los Angeles
Times described another murder by Latino gangs as “a manifestation of an
increasingly common trend: Latino ethnic cleansing of African Americans from
multiracial neighborhoods.”
The center’s board members include the executive director of
the state’s SEIU union, a professor from the Goldman School of Public Policy at
the University of California, Berkeley, and the research director at the
“Program for Environmental and Regional Equity” at the University of Southern
California, Los Angeles.
Outside California, President Donald Trump’s low-immigration
policies are pressuring employers to raise Americans’ wages in a hot economy.
The Wall Street Journal reportedAugust 29:
Overall, median weekly earnings rose 5% from the fourth quarter
of 2017 to the same quarter in 2018, according to the Bureau of Labor
Statistics. For workers between the ages of 25 and 34, that increase was 7.6%.
“The high cost of housing (71%) is the
most common reason given by voters for wanting to leave California,” polling
director Mark DiCamillo said. “However, high taxes (58%) and the state’s
political culture (46%) are also prominently mentioned, particularly by
Republicans and conservatives.”
Walters: California Paradox:
Economy–and poverty–hit record highs
California’s median income rose to among the nation’s
highest in 2018, but it ranked 50th in housing
By
happenstance, events in the final week of September perfectly framed what one
might call the California Paradox — a thriving, world-class economy with
stubbornly high levels of poverty and a widening divide between the haves and
have-nots.
The
week began with Gov. Gavin Newsom’s keynote address to a United
Nations-sponsored forum on the environment and economic growth, in which he
crowed about California’s economic achievements.
“It’s
an interesting fact, while this country is running $1 trillion-a-year deficits,
California is running historic budget surpluses,” Newsom told the international
audience. “It’s an interesting fact that California has enjoyed the lowest
unemployment rate in its history, more consecutive months of net job creation
than at any time in its history, and significantly outperforming the United
States of America in GDP growth over a five-year period — not despite our
environmental strategies, but because of our environmental strategies.
“As
we change the way we produce and consume energy, it is spawning new companies,
new energy, new growth. We lead in venture capital and green tech. Five to one
— five to one, the number of clean energy jobs in the state of California
versus fossil fuel jobs.”
But
a few days later, the Census Bureau released new state-by-state
data on income and poverty, underscoring once again that California is one
of the leaders in both categories.
While
California’s median personal income rose by 2.3% in 2018 to $75,277, one of the
nation’s highest levels, it was one of only five states in which the “Gini
index,” which measures income inequality, increased.
“New
census figures released today show rising income inequality across the state
and millions of California residents who are struggling to get by on extremely
low incomes, while higher-income households experienced more income growth,”
the California Budget & Policy Center said in its analysis of the
Census Bureau data.
The
organization noted that “from 2006 to 2018, the median household income in
California increased by 6.4%, after adjusting for inflation, but the average
real income for the lowest quintile of households (those in the bottom 20%)
actually decreased by 5.3% while the inflation-adjusted average
income for the top 5% of households increased by 18.6%, or nearly three times
as much as the increase in the median income.”
That
analysis is in line with another recent measure of wellbeing by an organization
called the “Social Progress Imperative.” It merges dozens of economic and other
factors to generate a “social progress index” for nations and their
subdivisions, including states — and California doesn’t fare well.
It
ranks 33rd among states and not surprisingly, its housing crisis is a
major reason why. The index places it at 49th in the category of “basic
human needs,” which includes a 50th place in “shelter.”
Finally,
a few days after Newsom bragged about California’s economic achievements to the
elite economic gathering in New York, UC Berkeley’s Institute of Governmental
Studies released its latest poll, revealing that half of the state’s
voters have considered leaving the state.
“The
high cost of housing (71%) is the most common reason given by voters for
wanting to leave California,” polling director Mark DiCamillo said. “However,
high taxes (58%) and the state’s political culture (46%) are also prominently
mentioned, particularly by Republicans and conservatives.”
Moreover,
just 50 percent of those surveyed agree that California is now the best place
to live.
There
you have it, the California Paradox.
No comments:
Post a Comment