Dems' self-destructive defense of Biden family corruption
You know those idealized, perfectly conical shapes small children draw to depict hills and mountain peaks? Well, according to the Cambridge Hillwalking Club, the Gaelic term for such a hill or peak so shaped is bidean or bidein. Usually we find depictions of bideins adorning kindergarten walls and refrigerator doors, but in the case of the 2020 Democrat presidential primary, it would seem the pooh-bahs of the party's congressional delegation seem to view, like small children, their own morally faulted, fissured, and distinctly irregular Biden as one of those idealized, perfectly symmetrical bideins, a pinnacle to be defended against all comers, in spite of a widely televised admission of corruption by Joe, involving himself and his son.
If Trump-deranged, impeachment-crazed Democrats were still demonstrating even minor signs of political sanity, one might suppose they would think long and hard before trying to defend such overt dishonesty while simultaneously attempting to impeach the sitting president for a far less serious and less provable act involving largely the same players in the same country. The Democrat leadership are confident that they can pull off this legerdemain because they believe that through their media minions, they control the watching eyes of the American public, keeping the rubes focused on fanciful hearings while the Bidens and their corrupt behavior remain hidden by media sleight of hand. Their confidence is easy to understand; Democrats have long enjoyed the luxury of having the coastal, urban, elite media acting as fang-toothed propagandists for the party while hiding behind a hypocritical hijab of pious impartiality.
Joe and Hunter Biden in the 2009 Obama inaugural parade (photo credit: acaben).
But now the media are no longer making even a token attempt to appear unbiased; their masks have come off, and their role as the publicity arm of a single political party is ever clearer to millions more of the American public. Now the Democrat prestidigitation is being seen for what it truly is: blatant, very high-level corruption during the Obama administration that Dems are trying to ignore and, even worse, condone, while cynically trying to unseat a president for a far less egregious offense. Dems refuse to accept the reality that acknowledging Joe Biden's probably corrupt activities bear investigating might mitigate the stench of hypocrisy that now surrounds their impeachment proceedings.
The Democrat leadership may still feel confident that with the media's one-sided support, they can bamboozle the American public with their Capitol Hill hocus pocus, but they would be well advised to pause first and ask themselves:
"Is this the wrong Bidein to die on?"
Only six
percent of the billions of dollars the "Foundation" takes in goes to
charity. The rest subsidizes the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons
and their sycophants; those people who have sold their souls to rub shoulders
with unadulterated power.
Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now." ---- Patricia McCarthy
Clinton Foundation
bleeding money with no Clintons in high office
The Bill, Hillary and
Chelsea Clinton Foundation can no longer raise enough money to cover its
expenses, ever since Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign failed to propel
her into an office from which she could dispense political favors. Clinton
Foundation reports to the IRS for the last two tax years have demonstrated that
without anyone to grant boons, fewer donors are interested in supporting it.
The
Clinton Foundation reported a loss of more than $16 million in 2018, according
to newly released tax records,
marking the second consecutive year of losses since Hillary Clinton's
humiliating defeat to President Donald J. Trump in 2016.
The
foundation reported total revenue of just $30.7 million, including $24.2
million worth of grants and contributions, a record low for the alleged
"charity." That figure was well short of the foundation's total
expenses for the year—$47.5 million— resulting in a net loss of $16.8 million.
The
previous year, the Clinton Foundation reported a net loss of $16.1 million. In
total, the organization has lost a staggering $32.9 million since Hillary
Clinton's lifelong quest for the presidency crumbled to dust in November 2016.
The contrast with previous
years when political favors were a lure is striking:
The
Clinton Foundation posted its highest revenue haul ($249 million) in 2009, the
year Hillary was sworn in as President Barack Obama's secretary of state. By
2013, the foundation had reported an additional $392.2 million in revenue, and
went on to raise $344.4 million between 2014 and 2016.
Between
2008 and 2016, the Clinton Foundation reported total revenue in excess of $1.1
billion, or an annual average of $130.4 million. Needless to say, Clinton's
stunning failure to defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 election appears to have
had a significant impact on the foundation's ability to raise money.
US Attorney for Utah, John
Huber, has been tasked with investigating the Clinton Foundation. So far there
has not been a single leak out of his office over its work. That could mean
either that they have turned up nothing, or that the investigation and grand
jury are proceeding with the secrecy that the law demands.
VIDEO:
THE FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY FROM THE FIRST DAY!
Is it a signal that she's back in the game because she's
selling her president-ability to the world's global billionaire crowd and
laying the groundwork for more funds? There are all kinds of ways
for foreign billionaires to get money to the U.S. without consequences, after
all. What's more, it's pretty much the biggest base of support she
has, which is at least one reason why she lost the 2016 election.
*
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public
service” into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth,
with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was
a political machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This
consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big
business support for the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their
personal fortunes.
The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid
speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign
contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton
Foundation.”
HILLARY
& BILLARY AND RED CHINA!
“Facilitating
strategic technology transfer in return for money is an old Clinton game.
The Chinese bought their way to access of considerable space technology
when Bill Clinton was president. Remember Charlie Trie, Loral, and the
rest of the crew?”
THE CLINTONS AND RED CHINA:
A MONEY MAKING TRAITORSHIP!
"Ask
Jeff Sessions about the charges. Money was flowing into the Clinton
Foundation from all over the world, disguised, rerouted through a Canadian
charity, all to obscure its origins."
AMERICAN
PREDATORS:
THE
BRIBES SUCKING LIVES OF HILLARY & BILLARY
The Clintons have been a criminal enterprise since they came
to power in Arkansas. The list of scandals they have generated is
long and tawdry. Their principal goal then and now has always been
to enrich themselves. They never once had a moral compunction about
lying, cheating, selling, and stealing their way to wealth. They are the
Perons of America. They eventually set up a "foundation"
and the money kept rolling in.
Only six percent of the billions of dollars the
"Foundation" takes in goes to charity. The rest subsidizes
the lavish lifestyles of the Clintons and their sycophants; those people who
have sold their souls to rub shoulders with unadulterated power.
THE SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her
PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
The
left cared nothing about that bit of collusion.
Hillary and her
campaign aides have long been involved with Russia for reasons of personal
gain. Clinton herself got $145 million in donations to
the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty percent of
all uranium production in the U.S. Her campaign
chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the financial benefits of being on the board
of a Russian company, Joule, which he did not disclose. PATRICIA
McCARTHY
Had
Hillary been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking in even more
millions than it did before. She would be happily selling access, favors
and our remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY
THE
PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION CHARITY slush fund
“There is no controlling Bill Clinton. He
does whatever he wants and runs up incredible expenses with foundation funds,”
states a separate interview memo attached to the submission.
“Bill
Clinton mixes and matches his personal
business
with that of the foundation. Many
people
within the foundation have tried to
caution
him about this but he does not listen,
and
there really is no talking to him,” the
memo
added.
No comments:
Post a Comment