Over the next half-century, California's
population will explode by nearly 75%, and
Riverside will surpass its bigger neighbors to
become the second most populous county after
Los Angeles, according to state Department of
Finance projections released Monday. California
will near the 60-million mark in 2050.
372,000 born to
immigrants every year, 33,000 to ‘tourists’
| December 12, 2019 04:13 AM
Illegal and visiting immigrants give birth to enough
children in the United States every year to top the populations of St. Louis,
Pittsburgh, or Anaheim, and at least 33,000 are considered “birth tourists”
eager to win their children birthright citizenship and themselves a quick
ticket in, according to two new reports out Thursday.
The Center for Immigration Studies, using federal
statistics, has found that there are 39,000 births a year to foreign students,
guest workers, and others on long-term temporary visas, plus an additional
33,000 births annually to tourists.
The group that
advocates for immigration reform added, “These births are in addition to the
nearly 300,000 births each year to illegal immigrants.”
Steven Camarota, the
report's lead author and the center's director of research, said, “Our analysis
makes clear that the number of children born to visitors is not trivial; and
over time the numbers are substantial.”
And, he added, “It
seems doubtful that the framers of the Fourteenth Amendment could have
anticipated that tens of thousands of people each year would automatically be
granted citizenship simply because their parents were on a temporary visit to
the United States at the time of their birth.”
“Birth tourism” has
been ripped by critics as a top immigration scam. Not only, under the
Fourteenth Amendment, do children born in the U.S. receive birthright
citizenship, but it opens the door to their parents, and eventually their
extended family, to getting citizenship or legal status.
The key findings from
Camarota’s reports are:
- Primarily foreign students,
guest workers, and exchange visitors, give birth to about 39,000 children
annually or 390,000 each decade.
- Many news stories in recent
years have focused on "birth tourism," which describes the
phenomenon of pregnant women coming to America shortly before their due
dates so their children are born in the U.S. and are awarded U.S.
citizenship. Based on a comparison of birth records and Census Bureau
data, we estimate there were 33,000 births to women on tourist visas in
the second half of 2016 and the first half of 2017. This translates to
perhaps 330,000 such births each decade.
- We estimate that at least 90% of
the fathers of children born to non-immigrant women were not U.S.
citizens, almost all of them on a temporary visa themselves or illegal
immigrants. This means at least 35,000 children were born to a
non-immigrant mother and were awarded U.S. citizenship at birth solely
because they were born on U.S. soil and not because their parents were
citizens or Lawful Permanent Residents (green card holders).
Another line they cut into: Illegals get free public housing as
impoverished Americans wait
Want some perspective
on why so many blue sanctuary cities have so many homeless encampments hovering
around?
Try the reality that
illegal immigrants are routinely given free public housing by the U.S., based
on the fact that they are uneducated, unskilled, and largely unemployable. Those are the
criteria, and now importing poverty has never been easier. Shockingly,
this comes as millions of poor Americans are out in the cold awaiting that
housing that the original law was intended to help.
Thus, the tent cities,
and by coincidence, the worst of these emerging shantytowns are in blue
sanctuary cities loaded with illegal immigrants - Orange County, San Francisco,
San Diego, Seattle, New York...Is there a connection? At a minimum, it's worth
looking at.
The Trump
administration's Department of Housing and Urban Development is finally trying
to put a stop to it as 1.5 million illegals prepare to enter the U.S. this
year, and one can only wonder why they didn't do it yesterday.
The plan would scrap
Clinton-era regulations that allowed illegal immigrants to sign up for
assistance without having to disclose their status.
Under the new Trump rules, not only
would the leaseholder using public housing have to be an eligible U.S. person,
but the government would verify all applicants through the Systematic Alien
Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) database, a federal system that’s used to
weed illegal immigrants out of other welfare programs.
Those already
getting HUD assistance would
have to go through a new verification, though it would be over a period of time
and wouldn’t all come at once.
“We’ve got our own
people to house and need to take care of our citizens,” an administration
official told The Washington Times. “Because of past loopholes in HUD guidance, illegal
aliens were able to live in free public housing desperately needed by so many
of our own citizens. As illegal aliens attempt to swarm our borders, we’re
sending the message that you can’t live off of American welfare on the
taxpayers’ dime.”
The Times notes that
the rules are confusingly contradictary, and some illegal immigrant families
are getting full rides based on just one member being born in the U.S. The pregnant caravaner
who calculatingly slipped across the U.S. in San Diego late last year, only to
have her baby the next day, now, along with her entire family, gets
that free ride on government housing. Plus lots of cheesy news coverage about how
heartwarming it all is. That's a lot cheaper than any housing she's going to
find back in Tegucigalpa.
Migrants would be
almost fools not to take the offering.
The problem of course
is that Americans who paid into these programs, and the subset who find
themselves in dire circumstances, are in fact being shut out.
The fill-the-pews
Catholic archbishops may love to tout the virtues of illegal immigrants and
wave signs about getting 'justice" for them, but the hard fact here
is that these foreign nationals are stealing from others as they take
this housing benefit under legal technicalities. That's not a good thing
under anyone's theological law. But hypocrisy is comfortable ground for the
entire open borders lobby as they shamelessly celebrate lawbreaking
at the border, leaving the impoverished of the U.S. out cold.
The Trump
administration is trying to have this outrage fixed by summer. But don't
imagine it won't be without the open-borders lawsuits, the media sob stories,
the leftist judges, and the scolding clerics.
AMERICA, THE
ANCHOR BABIES FOR WELFARE STATE
“Through love of having children we're going to
take over." Augustin Cebada,
Information Minister of Fascist Brown Berets, militant para-military soldiers
of Aztlan shouting at U.S. citizens at an Independence Day rally in Los
Angeles, 7/4/96 (LOS ANGELES COUNTY HANDS OUT $1 BILLION YEARL TO MEXICO’S
ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS)
“As Breitbart News recently reported, there are more anchor baby births in the Los
Angeles, California metro area than the total U.S. births in 14 states and the
District of Colombia. Every year, American taxpayers are billed
about $2.4 billion to pay for the births of illegal aliens.” JOHN BINDER
Cost to U.S. Taxpayers
$5.3 Billion:
429,000 Annual
Immigrant Birth Costs...
isn't that the same figure
they can't find to
build the wall???
By Frosty Wooldridge
NewsWithViews.com
. . .
https://newswithviews.com/cost-to-u-s-taxpayers-5-3-billion-429000-annual-immigrant-birth-costs/
"According to various estimates, American taxpayers spend
from 110 to 260 billion dollars a year to support illegal
aliens. This large discrepancy is due to exactly how to count, and
who exactly counts." GARY GINDLER
“We have to act now because both parties
failed in the past. Many Democrats
want open borders because they see illegal aliens as future voters. Many
donor-class Republicans have tolerated illegal immigration because of business
demand for cheap labor. That is why both parties have overlooked the laws they
voted to pass and ignored the wishes of the American people.” Joel B. Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News
“Our
border wall will cost upwards of $25
billion. Democrats have the audacity to
say
that the wall is too expensive. Meanwhile,
Democrats shower illegal aliens
with $135
billion annually in
giveaways. How can
Democrats, with a straight face, tell us that
$25 billion is
too much?” LLOYD MARCUS /
AMERICAN THINKER
The Hidden State of Illegalia
All of us have to thank
Nancy Pelosi. She turned out to be not only the speaker of the House
of Representatives, but also an excellent salesperson. Thanks to her
ill conceived tricks, the advertisement of the annual presidential State of the
Union (SOTU) address to the Congress reached unprecedented heights.
If earlier such
traditional performances were simply routine, and only a few people outside
Washington were interested, then this year, the situation (thanks to Pelosi)
was significantly different. She invited Trump to speak on January
3, 2019, then "canceled" her invitation on January
16. Then the partial government shutdown ended, and the SOTU was
rescheduled to February 5.
Pelosi's request for a
cancelation of this traditional presidential address was an unprecedented and
unheard of scandal, which ignores a hundred-year-old tradition. She
was successful in postponing the presidential address, but that was a classic
example of a Pyrrhic victory (hat tip: Ronald Cherry). Trump could
have used this opportunity for his advantage. He talked about the
economy, record low unemployment numbers, legal immigration, and foreign
policy. What he spent less time on than he should have is the State
of Illegalia.
Unfortunately, most
Americans are not aware of such a state. No, it is not the 51st
state in the Union; instead, it is a satellite substate within every legitimate
state of the Union.
For example, in the
state of California alone, there are about 1.2 million children born out of
"tourism" of pregnant illegal aliens. These are official
hospital data. For comparison, the population of the legitimate
state of Wyoming is about 600,000 people.
That is, inside the state
of California, there is a substate — the State of Illegalia — whose population
is twice the state of Wyoming.
California's State of
Illegalia is not alone. All states of the Union contain within them,
hidden from prying eyes, substates of Illegalia. In Illinois, there
are 174,000 illegal children. For comparison, the popular among
legal immigrants Chicago North Shore area contains just half of Illegalia's
population — 86,000. In the state of New York, there are 224,000
such children. For comparison, only 36,000 people live in the
popular among legal immigrants Brighton Beach area of New York City.
This confrontation is
obviously a losing matter for the Democrats. They openly position
themselves as a party that protects illegal aliens and distance themselves from
the protection of American citizens. Pelosi did not want to give
Trump the podium, which he could and did use to once again turn to the common
sense of the American people. Whenever Trump speaks, he speaks
directly to American citizens, and not through the filter of mass
disinformation media.
After the Democrats
attempted to destroy a hundred-year-old tradition, Trump could have made some
unconventional moves, too. In order to emphasize this talk about the
States of Illegalia, he could have invited some non-traditional guests to the
SOTU address.
The composition of these
guests would be the main headache of the Democrats.
Imagine guest seats
filled with parents of those American children who were killed by the citizens
of the State of Illegalia — by illegal aliens. Some of them were
murdered directly, and some indirectly — with the help of drugs transported
across the border with Mexico in tons.
Also, several crying
15-year-old girls from South America could be invited, who were secretly
brought by human-traffickers across the southern border for underground
brothels in the State of Illegalia. Moreover, President Trump could
end the tradition of the one-man-show and give the floor to them all in turn.
Trump could also give the
floor to American doctors, who will tell the public what diseases they face in
the states of Illegalia. Many of these diseases were practically
eliminated in America soon after the Second World War — measles, scarlet fever,
lice, tuberculosis, syphilis. However, these diseases are returning
to America, and they are penetrating — initially through the open border with
Mexico, and then through the States of Illegalia. Also, there are
numerous cases of AIDS and hepatitis, plus widespread rape of women of all
ages.
The U.S. Border Patrol
guards would then be invited to the podium. They would bring with
them a few rugs — the rugs Muslims use to pray. Recently, border
guards have been finding more and more such rugs in the border zones of Arizona
and Texas. Why should representatives of the "peaceful
religion" get into America through the State of Illegalia? Why
resort to such infiltration? What is the level of cooperation
between sharia states and the State of Illegalia?
Trump could also go to
extremes and order a baker's dozen handcuffed MS-13 gang members, with the most
evil faces, entirely covered with scary tattoos, to be seated right next to
Democrats' guests for the SOTU. These bandits — citizens of the
State of Illegalia — could play an excellent backdrop to Trump's pitch for the
country's sovereignty.
According to various
estimates, American taxpayers spend from 110 to 260 billion dollars a year to
support illegal aliens. This large discrepancy is due to exactly how
to count, and who exactly counts. However, regardless of who makes the
estimates and how, all calculations are one in one: the balance is
negative. That is, illegal aliens receive more from American society
than they give, at least 100 billion dollars a year. This number is
the budget of the State of Illegalia.
The Democrats have long
represented the interests of the states of Illegalia, and not the citizens of
the states of the Union. We must hope that Pelosi will play her role
to the end.
Hispanic Family Values?
OR RUNAWAY ILLEGITIMACY paid for by
AMERICANS?
“Through love of having
children, we are going to take over.”
City Journal
Hispanic Family Values?
Runaway illegitimacy is creating a new U.S. underclass.
By Heather Mac Donald
Unless the life chances
of children raised by single mothers suddenly improve, the explosive growth of
the U.S. Hispanic population over the next couple of decades does not bode well
for American social stability. Hispanic immigrants bring near–Third World
levels of fertility to America, coupled with what were once thought to be First
World levels of illegitimacy. (In fact, family breakdown is higher in many Hispanic
countries than here.) Nearly half of the children born to Hispanic mothers in
the U.S. are born out of wedlock, a proportion that has been increasing rapidly
with no signs of slowing down. Given
what psychologists and sociologists now know about the much higher likelihood
of social pathology among those who grow up in single-mother households, the
Hispanic baby boom is certain to produce more juvenile delinquents, more school
failure, more welfare use, and more teen pregnancy in the future.
The government social-services sector has already latched onto
this new client base; as the Hispanic population expands, so will the demands
for a larger welfare state. Since conservative open-borders advocates have yet
to acknowledge the facts of Hispanic family breakdown, there is no way to know
what their solution to it is. But they had better come up with one quickly,
because the problem is here—and growing.
The dimensions of the
Hispanic baby boom are startling. The Hispanic birthrate is twice as high as
that of the rest of the American population. That high fertility rate—even more than unbounded
levels of immigration—will fuel the rapid Hispanic population boom in the
coming decades. By 2050, the Latino population will have tripled, the Census
Bureau projects. One in four Americans will be
Hispanic by mid-century, twice the current ratio. In states such as California
and Texas, Hispanics will be in the clear majority. Nationally, whites will drop from
near 70 percent of the total population in 2000 to just half by 2050. Hispanics
will account for 46 percent of the nation’s added population over the next two
decades, the Pew Hispanic Center reports.
But it’s the fertility surge among unwed Hispanics that
should worry policymakers. Hispanic women have the highest unmarried birthrate
in the country—over three times that of whites and Asians, and nearly one and a
half times that of black women, according to the Centers for Disease Control. Every 1,000 unmarried Hispanic women bore 92 children in 2003 (the
latest year for which data exist), compared with 28 children for every 1,000
unmarried white women, 22 for every 1,000 unmarried Asian women, and 66 for
every 1,000 unmarried black women. Forty-five percent of all Hispanic births occur outside of
marriage, compared with 24 percent of white births and 15 percent of Asian
births. Only the percentage of black out-of-wedlock births—68 percent—exceeds
the Hispanic rate. But the black population is not going to triple over the
next few decades.
As if the unmarried Hispanic birthrate weren’t worrisome
enough, it is increasing faster than among other groups. It jumped 5 percent
from 2002 to 2003, whereas the rate for other unmarried women remained flat.
Couple the high and increasing illegitimacy rate of Hispanics with their higher
overall fertility rate, and you have a recipe for unstoppable family breakdown.
The only bright news in this demographic disaster story
concerns teen births. Overall teen childbearing in the U.S. declined for the
12th year in a row in 2003, having dropped by more than a third since 1991. Yet
even here, Hispanics remain a cause for concern. The rate of childbirth for
Mexican teenagers, who come from by far the largest and fastest-growing
immigrant population, greatly outstrips every other group. The Mexican teen
birthrate is 93 births per every 1,000 girls, compared with 27 births for every
1,000 white girls, 17 births for every 1,000 Asian girls, and 65 births for
every 1,000 black girls. To put these numbers into international perspective,
Japan’s teen birthrate is 3.9, Italy’s is 6.9, and France’s is 10. Even though
the outsize U.S. teen birthrate is dropping, it continues to inflict
unnecessary costs on the country, to which Hispanics contribute
disproportionately.
To grasp the reality behind those numbers, one need only talk
to people working on the front lines of family breakdown. Social workers in
Southern California, the national epicenter for illegal Hispanic immigrants and
their progeny, are in despair over the epidemic of single parenting. Not only has illegitimacy become perfectly acceptable, they say, but so
has the resort to welfare and social services to cope with it.
Dr. Ana Sanchez delivers babies at St. Joseph’s Hospital in
the city of Orange, California, many of them to Hispanic teenagers. To her
dismay, they view having a child at their age as normal. A recent patient just
had her second baby at age 17; the baby’s father is in jail. But what is “most
alarming,” Sanchez says, is that the “teens’ parents view having babies outside
of marriage as normal, too. A lot of the grandmothers are single as well; they
never married, or they had successive partners. So the mom sends the message to
her daughter that it’s okay to have children out of wedlock.”
Sanchez feels almost personally involved in the problem: “I’m
Hispanic myself. I wish I could find out what the Asians are doing right.” She
guesses that Asian parents’ passion for education inoculates their children
against teen pregnancy and the underclass trap. “Hispanics are not picking that
up like the Asian kids,” she sighs.
Conservatives who support open borders are fond of invoking
“Hispanic family values” as a benefit of unlimited Hispanic immigration.
Marriage is clearly no longer one of those family values. But other kinds of
traditional Hispanic values have survived—not all of them necessarily ideal in
a modern economy, however. One of them is the importance of having children
early and often. “It’s considered almost a badge of honor for a young girl to have
a baby,” says Peggy Schulze of Chrysalis House, an adoption agency in Fresno.
(Fresno has one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in California, typical of
the state’s heavily Hispanic farm districts.) It is almost impossible to
persuade young single Hispanic mothers to give up their children for adoption,
Schulze says. “The attitude is: ‘How could you give away your baby?’ I don’t
know how to break through.”
The most powerful Hispanic family value—the tight-knit
extended family—facilitates unwed child rearing. A single mother’s relatives
often step in to make up for the absence of the baby’s father. I asked Mona, a
19-year-old parishioner at St. Joseph’s Church in Santa Ana, California, if she
knew any single mothers. She laughed: “There are so many I can’t even name
them.” Two of her cousins, aged 25 and 19, have children without having
husbands. The situation didn’t seem to trouble this churchgoer too much.
“They’ll be strong enough to raise them. It’s totally okay with us,” she said.
“We’re very close; we’re there to support them. They’ll do just fine.”
As Mona’s family suggests, out-of-wedlock child rearing among
Hispanics is by no means confined to the underclass. The St. Joseph’s
parishioners are precisely the churchgoing, blue-collar workers whom open-borders
conservatives celebrate. Yet this community is as susceptible as any other to
illegitimacy. Fifty-year-old Irma and her husband, Rafael, came legally from
Mexico in the early 1970s. Rafael works in a meatpacking plant in Brea; they
have raised five husky boys who attend church with them. Yet Irma’s sister—a
homemaker like herself, also married to a factory hand—is now the grandmother
of two illegitimate children, one by each daughter. “I saw nothing in the way
my sister and her husband raised her children to explain it,” Irma says. “She
gave them everything.” One of the fathers of Irma’s young nieces has four other
children by a variety of different mothers. His construction wages are being
garnished for child support, but he is otherwise not involved in raising his
children.
The fathers of these illegitimate children are often
problematic in even more troubling ways. Social workers report that the
impregnators of younger Hispanic women are with some regularity their uncles,
not necessarily seen as a bad thing by the mother’s family. Alternatively, the
father may be the boyfriend of the girl’s mother, who then continues to stay
with the grandmother. Older men seek out young girls in
the belief that a virgin cannot get pregnant during her first intercourse, and
to avoid sexually transmitted diseases.
The tradition of starting families young and expand- ing them
quickly can come into conflict with more modern American mores. Ron Storm, the
director of the Hillview Acres foster-care home in Chino, tells of a
15-year-old girl who was taken away from the 21-year-old father of her child by
a local child-welfare department. The boyfriend went to jail, charged with
rape. But the girl’s parents complained about the agency’s interference, and
eventually both the girl and her boyfriend ended up going back to Mexico,
presumably to have more children. “At 15, as the Quinceañera tradition
celebrates, you’re considered ready for marriage,” says Storm. Or at least for
childbearing; the marriage part is disappearing.
But though older men continue to take advantage of younger
women, the age gap between the mother and the father of an illegitimate child
is quickly closing. Planned Parenthood of Orange and San Bernardino Counties
tries to teach young fathers to take responsibility for their children. “We’re
seeing a lot more 13- and 14-year-old fathers,” says Kathleen Collins, v.p. of
health education. The day before we spoke, Scott Montoya, an Orange County
sheriff’s deputy, arrested two 14-year-old boys who were bragging about having
sexual relations with a cafeteria worker from an Olive Garden restaurant. “It’s
now all about getting girls pregnant when you’re age 15,” he says. One
18-year-old in the Planned Parenthood fathers’ program has two children by two
different girls and is having sex with five others, says health worker Jason
Warner. “A lot of [the adolescent sexual behavior] has to do with getting
respect from one’s peers,” observes Warner.
Normally, the fathers, of whatever age, take off. “The father
may already be married or in prison or doing drugs,” says Amanda Gan, director
of operations for Toby’s House, a maternity home in Dana Point, California.
Mona, the 19-year-old parishioner at St. Joseph’s Church, says that the boys
who impregnated her two cousins are “nowhere to be found.” Her family knows
them but doesn’t know if they are working or in jail.
Two teen mothers at the Hillview Acres home represent the
outer edge of Hispanic family dysfunction. Yet many aspects of their lives are
typical. Though these teenagers’ own mothers were unusually callous and
irresponsible, the social milieu in which they were raised is not unusual.
Irene’s round, full face makes her look younger than her 14
years, certainly too young to be a mother. But her own mother’s boyfriend
repeatedly forced sex on her, with the mother’s acquiescence. The result was
Irene’s baby, Luz. Baby Luz has an uncle her own age, Irene’s new 13-month-old
brother. Like Irene, Irene’s mother had her first child at 14, and produced
five more over the next 16 years, all of whom went into foster care. Irene’s
father committed suicide before she was old enough to know him. The four
fathers of her siblings are out of the picture, too: one of them, the father of
her seven-year-old brother and five-year-old sister, was deported back to
Mexico after he showed up drunk for a visit with his children, in violation of
his probation conditions.
Irene is serene and articulate—remarkably so, considering
that in her peripatetic early life in Orange County she went to school maybe
twice a week. She likes to sing and to read books that are sad, she says,
especially books by Dave Pelzer, a child-abuse victim who has published three
best-selling memoirs about his childhood trauma. She says she will never get
married: “I don’t want another man in my life. I don’t want that experience
again.”
Eighteen-year-old Jessica at least escaped rape, but her
family experiences were bad enough. The large-limbed young woman, whose long
hair is pulled back tightly from her heart-shaped face, grew up in the
predominantly Hispanic farming community of Indio in the Coachella Valley. She
started “partying hard” in fifth grade, she says—at around the same time that
her mother, separated from her father, began using drugs and going clubbing. By
the eighth grade, Jessica and her mother were drinking and smoking marijuana
together. Jessica’s family had known her boyfriend’s family since she was four;
when she had her first child by him—she was 14 and he was 21—her mother
declared philosophically that she had always known that it would happen. “It
was okay with her, so long as he continued to give her drugs.”
Jessica originally got pregnant to try to clean up her life,
she says. “I knew what I was doing was not okay, so having a baby was a way for
me to stop doing what I was doing. In that sense, the baby was planned.” She
has not used drugs since her first pregnancy, though she occasionally drinks.
After her daughter was born, she went to live with her boyfriend in a filthy
trailer without plumbing; they scrounged food from dumpsters, despite the
income from his illegal drug business. They planned to get married, but by the
time she got pregnant again with a son, “We were having a lot of problems. We’d
be holding hands, and he’d be looking at other girls. I didn’t want him to
touch me.” Eventually, the county welfare agency removed her and put her in
foster care with her two children.
Both Jessica and her caddish former boyfriend illustrate the
evanescence of the celebrated Hispanic “family values.” Her boyfriend’s family
could not be more traditional. Two years ago, Jessica went back to Mexico to
celebrate her boyfriend’s parents’ 25th wedding anniversary and the renewal of
their wedding vows. Jessica’s own mother got married at 15 to her father, who
was ten years her senior. Her father would not let his wife work; she was a
“stay-at-home wife,” Jessica says. But don’t blame the move to the U.S. for the
behavior of younger generations; the family crack-up is happening even faster
in Latin America.
Jessica’s mother may have been particularly negligent, but
Jessica’s experiences are not so radically different from those of her peers.
“Everybody’s having babies now,” she says. “The Coachella Valley is filled with
girls’ pregnancies. Some girls live with their babies’ dads; they consider them
their husbands.” These cohabiting relationships rarely last, however, and a new
cohort of fatherless children goes out into the world.
Despite the strong family support, the prevalence of single
parenting among Hispanics is producing the inevitable slide into the welfare
system. “The girls aren’t marrying the guys, so they are married to the state,”
Dr. Sanchez observes. Hispanics now dominate the federal Women, Infants, and
Children free food program; Hispanic enrollment grew over 25 percent from 1996
to 2002, while black enrollment dropped 12 percent and white enrollment dropped
6.5 percent. Illegal immigrants can get WIC and other welfare programs for
their American-born children. If Congress follows President Bush’s urging and
grants amnesty to most of the 11 million illegal aliens in the country today,
expect the welfare rolls to skyrocket as the parents themselves become
eligible.
Amy Braun works for Mary’s Shelter, a home for young single
mothers who are homeless or in crisis, in Orange County, California. It has
become “culturally okay” for the Hispanic population to use the shelter and
welfare system, Braun says. A case manager at a program for pregnant homeless
women in the city of Orange observes the same acculturation to the
social-services sector, with its grievance mongering and sense of victimhood.
“I’ll have women in my office on their fifth child, when the others have
already been placed in foster care,” says Anita Berry of Casa Teresa. “There’s
nothing shameful about having multiple children that you can’t care for, and to
be pregnant again, because then you can blame the system.”
The consequences of family breakdown are now being passed
down from one generation to the next, in an echo of the black underclass. “The
problems are deeper and wider,” says Berry. “Now you’re getting the second
generation of foster care and group home residents. The dysfunction is
multigenerational.”
The social-services complex has responded with barely
concealed enthusiasm to this new flood of clients. As Hispanic social problems
increase, so will the government sector that ministers to them. In July, a New
York Times editorial, titled young latinas and a cry for help, pointed out the
elevated high school dropout rates and birthrates among Hispanic girls. A
quarter of all Latinas are mothers by the age of 20, reported the Times. With
the usual melodrama that accompanies the pitch for more government services,
the Times designated young Latinas as “endangered” in the same breath that it disclosed
that they are one of the fastest-growing segments of the population. “The time
to help is now,” said the Times—by which it means ratcheting up the
taxpayer-subsidized social-work industry.
In response to the editorial, Carmen Barroso, regional director
of International Planned Parenthood Federation/Western Hemisphere Region,
proclaimed in a letter to the editor the “urgent need for health care
providers, educators and advocates to join the sexual and reproductive health
movement to ensure the fundamental right to services for young Latinas.”
Wherever these “fundamental rights” might come from,
Barroso’s call nevertheless seems quite superfluous, since there is no shortage
of taxpayer-funded “services” for troubled Latinas—or Latinos. The schools in
California’s San Joaquin Valley have day care for their students’ babies,
reports Peggy Schulze of Chrysalis House. “The girls get whatever they
need—welfare, medical care.” Advocates for young unwed moms in New York’s South
Bronx are likewise agitating for more day-care centers in high schools there,
reports El Diario/La Prensa. A bill now in Congress, the Latina Adolescent
Suicide Prevention Act, aims to channel $10 million to “culturally competent”
social agencies to improve the self-esteem of Latina girls and to provide
“support services” to their families and friends if they contemplate suicide.
The trendy “case management” concept, in which individual
“cases” become the focal point around which a solar system of social workers
revolves, has even reached heavily Hispanic elementary and middle schools. “We
have a coordinator, who brings in a collaboration of agencies to deal with the
issues that don’t allow a student to meet his academic goals, such as domestic
violence or drugs,” explains Sylvia Rentria, director of the Family Resource
Center at Berendo Middle School in Los Angeles. “We can provide individual
therapy.” Rentria offers the same program at nearby Hoover Elementary School
for up to 100 students.
This July, Rentria launched a new session of Berendo’s
Violence Intervention Program for parents of children who are showing signs of
gang involvement and other antisocial behavior. Ghady M., 55 and a “madre
soltera” (single mother), like most of the mothers in the program, has been
called in because her 16-year-old son, Christian, has been throwing gang signs
at school, cutting half his classes, and ending up in the counseling office
every day. The illegal Guatemalan is separated from her partner, who was “muy
malo,” she says; he was probably responsible for her many missing teeth. (The
detectives in the heavily Hispanic Rampart Division of the Los Angeles Police
Department, which includes the Berendo school, spend inordinate amounts of time
on domestic violence cases.) Though Ghady used to work in a factory on Broadway
in downtown L.A.— often referred to as Little Mexico City—she now collects $580
in welfare payments and $270 in food stamps for her two American-born children.
Christian is a husky smart aleck in a big white T-shirt; his
fashionably pomaded hair stands straight up. He goes to school but doesn’t do
homework, he grins; and though he is not in a gang, he says, he has friends who
are. Keeping Ghady and Christian company at the Violence Intervention Program
is Ghady’s grandniece, Carrie, a lively ten-year-old. Carrie lives with her
26-year-old mother but does not know her father, who also sired her 12-year-old
brother. Her five-year-old brother has a different father.
Yet for all these markers of social dysfunction, fatherless
Hispanic families differ from the black underclass in one significant area:
many of the mothers and the absent fathers work, even despite growing welfare
use. The former boyfriend of Jessica, the 18-year-old mother at the Hillview
Acres foster home, works in construction and moonlights on insulation jobs;
whether he still deals drugs is unknown. Jessica is postponing joining her
father in Texas until she finishes high school, because once she moves in with
him, she will feel obligated to get a job to help the family finances. The
mother of Hillview’s 14-year-old Irene used to fix soda machines in Anaheim,
California, though she got fired because she was lazy, Irene says. Now, under
court compulsion, she works in a Lunchables factory in Santa Ana, a condition
of getting her children back from foster care. The 18-year-old Lothario and
father of two, whom Planned Parenthood’s Jason Warner is trying to counsel,
works at a pet store. The mother of Carrie, the vivacious ten-year-old sitting
in on Berendo Middle School’s Violence Intervention Program, makes pizza at a
Papa John’s pizza outlet.
How these two value systems—a lingering work ethic and
underclass mating norms—will interact in the future is anyone’s guess. Orange
County sheriff’s deputy Montoya says that the older Hispanic generation’s work
ethic is fast disappearing among the gangbanging youngsters whom he sees. “Now,
it’s all about fast money, drugs, and sex.” It may be that the willingness to
work will plummet along with marriage rates, leading to even greater social problems
than are now rife among Hispanics. Or it may be that the two contrasting
practices will remain on parallel tracks, creating a new kind of underclass: a
culture that tolerates free-floating men who impregnate women and leave, like
the vast majority of black men, yet who still labor in the noncriminal economy.
The question is whether, if the disposition to work remains relatively strong,
a working parent will inoculate his or her illegitimate children against the
worst degradations that plague black ghettos.
From an intellectual standpoint, this is a fascinating social
experiment, one that academicians are—predictably—not attuned to. But the
consequences will be more than intellectual: they may severely strain the
social fabric. Nevertheless, it is an experiment that we seem destined to see
to its end. Tisha Roberts, a supervisor at an Orange County, California,
institution that assists children in foster care, has given up hope that the
illegitimacy rate will taper off. “It’s going to continue to grow,” she says,
“until we can put birth control in the water.”
The surge in Mexican
breeders in America’s open borders.
MEXICO'S BIGGEST EXPORTS ARE: DRUGS, POVERTY, CRIMINALS and
ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS FOR 18 YEARS OF GRINGO-PAID WELFARE.
“Through love of having children, we are going to take
over.” AUGUSTIN CEBADA, BROWN BERETS,
THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY
PREGNANT WOMEN JUMP AMERICAN BORDERS FOR THE LA RAZA WELFARE
PROGRAM TO ANCHOR AND EXPAND MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE IN U.S. BORDERS
2003: Mexican population in U.S. reported to have increased
10 percent in just three years, mostly as a result of illegal immigration.
Mexicans encouraged to breed at all costs. "A baby a year" Mexican
pride slogan emerges …EVERY ANCHOR BABY GETS MORE WELFARE FOR 18 YEARS. THAT
CHILD IS ALSO STILL A CITIZEN OF MEXICO!
The birthrate among illegals is more than double that of
legal US residents. The Pew Hispanic Center calculates that within seven years,
the children of immigrants, legal and illegal, will account for one in nine
school-age children in the US.
Heritage: Amnestied Illegals Will Get $9.4T in Benefits;
Increase Debt $6.3T'
…. LA RAZA already gets all our jobs!
what is the REAL cost of all that “CHEAP” Mexican labor? Add
it up and then factor in the MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE and the fact that the
MEXICAN now operate in 2,500 American
cities!
“THE AMNESTY ALONE WILL BE THE LARGEST EXPANSION OF THE
WELFARE SYSTEM IN THE LAST 25 YEARS” Heritage Foundation
"The amnesty alone will be the largest expansion of the
welfare system in the last 25 years," says Robert Rector, a senior analyst
at the Heritage Foundation, and a witness at a House Judiciary Committee field
hearing in San Diego Aug. 2. "Welfare costs will begin to hit their peak
around 2021, because there are delays in citizenship. The very narrow time
horizon [the CBO is] using is misleading," he adds. "If even a small
fraction of those who come into the country stay and get on Medicaid, you're
looking at costs of $20 billion or $30 billion per year."
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY HANDS THEIR LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF HEAVY
BREEDING ILLEGALS MUCHO WELFARE!
IMMIGRATION BILL TO BRING IN AT LEAST 33 MILLION PEOPLE IN
ONE DECADE
By Frosty Wooldridge
April 30, 2013
NewsWithViews.com
If the S744 amnesty bill passes, we can expect 33 million
added immigrants within 10 years. That’s for starters. When you add their
progeny, chain migration and our own population momentum of one million
annually, we face the most profound explosion of humanity within our borders
ever in the history of humanity.
It’s the equivalent of
adding one additional New York City, Los Angeles, Houston, Philadelphia,
Phoenix, San Antonio, San Diego, Dallas, San Jose, Jacksonville, Indianapolis,
Austin, San Francisco, Columbus, Fort Worth, Charlotte, Detroit, El Paso,
Memphis and Boston. If the bill passed, it would be the same as adding ALL of
the Top 20 cities in the United States in a short 10 years. That of course does
not include additional population growth driven by birth rates.
“The pending Senate immigration bill would bring a minimum of
33 million people into the country during its first decade of operation,” said
Roy Beck, director of www.numbersusa.org. “By 2024, the inflow would include an
estimated 9.2 million illegal immigrants, plus 2.5 million illegals who arrived
as children — dubbed ‘Dreamers’ — plus roughly 3.4 million company-sponsored
employees with university degrees, said the unreleased analysis.
“The majority of the inflow, or roughly 17 million people,
would consist of family members of illegals, recent immigrants and of
company-sponsored workers. The estimate is likely the first of several that
will be produced by advocates as the Senate grapples with the immigration bill
developed by the “Gang of Eight” senators.
“The 844-page bill was released last week, and was scheduled
for debate and amendment in the Senate’s judiciary committee starting April 25.
However, the amendment process was held up for a week by Republican Senators.
Advocates for the bill have yet to release any estimates of the future inflow.”
“Nobody has a number that is based on the bill right now
that’s accurate,” Lynn Tramonte, deputy director of the pro-immigration
America’s Voice Education Fund, told the Christian Science Monitor in an April
25 article. “It’ll take a bit more [analysis] to get a specific number about
how things will change.”
“An April 20-22 Fox News poll of 1,009 registered voters
showed that 55 percent of respondents want a reduction in the current number of
legal immigrants,” said Beck. “Currently, the country accepts 1 million
immigrants and 700,000 temporary company-sponsored workers each year. The bill
would boost that to roughly 3 million immigrants and 1 million
company-sponsored workers per year. Forty-five percent of non-whites, 53
percent of independents and 62 percent of people without college degrees, favor
a reduction in legal immigrants. Only 18 percent of Republicans and 29 percent
of independents favor an increase in legal immigration, the Fox poll reported.”
The current population of the United States is 316 million.
That estimate includes 40 million immigrants, both legal and illegal. Opponents
of the immigration bill are already highlighting the potentially large inflow.
“I believe the interest that needs to be protected is the
national interest of the United States, and that includes existing workers
today, workers whose wages have been pulled down, without doubt, by a large
flow of low-wage labor into the country,” Alabama Republican Sen. Jeff Sessions
said during one of three hearings on the pending bill. “This bill would
continue that in a way that’s very disturbing to me.”
Beck said, “Estimates of a 33 million inflow are conservative
… [because they do] not attempt to project increases in these categories that are
certain to occur in future years,” once many of the new immigrants seek green
cards for their overseas relatives. Also, some categories of immigrants are
uncapped, and the analysis does not attempt to project increases in these
[family unification] categories that are certain to occur in future years.
“The pending bill allows illegal immigrants to bring their
overseas spouses and children into the country. If that provision is
implemented, it could more than double the [illegal immigrant inflow] number shown
in the chart, bringing the total inflow to 40 million by 2024.”
The analysis shows an inflow of roughly 3.4 million
university trained immigrants. That estimate does not include graduates who get
green cards under the family unification route, or the uncapped inflow of
doctors and PhD-carrying scientists. Roughly 1.8 million Americans graduate
from college each year, including 300,000 with degrees in science and
engineering. Population-growth forecasts will also contribute to the emerging
fight over the bill’s cost, because the award of a green card — or the right to
live in the United States — confers access to some government benefits.
“It is important to note here that each of the individuals
represented in this chart becomes eligible for Obamacare on the day a green
card is issued,” said Beck. “Most of those on the chart will then have to wait
five years before they become eligible for all US welfare benefits … [but some]
will actually become eligible for welfare immediately upon being issued a green
card.” Enrollment in Obamacare is expected to spike the cost of the immigration
bill, partly because federal subsidies are used to offset the annual Obamacare
cost of $20,000 for a family of four. All totaled, The Heritage Foundation
estimate the total cost of this amnesty from a low of $3 trillion to as high as
$5 trillion.
Join me, Frosty Wooldridge, with Dave Chaffin, host of the
Morning Zone at 650 AM, www.KGAB.com, Cheyenne, Wyoming every Monday 7:00 a.m.
to 8:00 a.m., as we discuss my latest commentaries on www.NewsWithViews.com
about issues facing America. You may stream the show on your computer. You may
call in at: 1-888-503-6500.
EVERY DAY THERE ARE 12 AMERICANS MURDERED BY MEXICANS AND 8
CHILDREN MOLESTED.
MEXICANS ARE THE MOST VIOLENT CULTURE IN THE HEMISPHERE.
ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN. KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF OF
ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE NOW BY MEXICAN GANGS.
YOU REALLY WANT LA RAZA AMNESTY AND OPEN BORDERS?
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/02/obamas-amnesty-and-la-raza-child.html
NEWS & VIEWS This Just In
Stepfather of '9-Year-Old' Girl Who Gave Birth Admits to
Fathering Baby
Posted by Lindsay Mannering
on February 15, 2013 at 12:33 PM
The 9-year-old girl who allegedly gave birth last month in a
Mexican hospital may not be as young as originally reported. After authorities
dug a little deeper, it's now believed Dafne is at least 12 or 13, or even as
"old" as 15, says one doctor.
It was Dafne's mother who first claimed her daughter was
impregnated when she was 8-years-old by her 17-year-old boyfriend, but it's
becoming more and more clear that may not be the case. The mother's husband,
Dafne's 44-year-old stepfather, has admitted to having sexwith the girl on a
couple of occasions and has revealed he's the father of her child.
He's now in police custody and will be charged with child
molestation for the alleged rape of his step-daughter.
The circumstances under which Dafne's birth certificate were
obtained are shady -- her mother filed for one in 2011, claiming Dafne was born
in 2003, making her 9. The validity of that claim is still under investigation.
Dafne's story continues to get sadder, though, believe it or
not. Neighbors told MailOnline that Dafne's mother may have lied about her
daughter's age for two reasons: One, because Dafne was never in school, and her
mother wanted to enroll her daughter for the first time -- a feat more likely
accomplished if her daughter was 8 or 9.
Or two, because Dafne's mother, an alleged prostitute, wanted
to sell her daughter as a 9-year-old in the sex trade and was motivated to
shave off a few years since, apparently, there's a bigger prize for girls
younger than 12 or 13-years-old.
Anyone else sick to their stomach right now?
To say Dafne's story is heartbreaking or gut-wrenching is an
understatement. Even though she may not have been 8 when she was impregnated,
is 12 or 13 any better? Doctor's still deemed her body too young to handle a
vaginal birth and had to perform a C-section. This girl was still, in fact, a
child, no matter how you calculate it.
It's hard to find a silver lining to this story, but I
suppose the fact that the stepfather is behind bars is a small one, and the
fact that international light has been shed on Dafne's story is perhaps a
slightly bigger one.
Because the more people invested in learning more about what
happened and how to consequently keep this child who had a child safe from
further abuse and danger, the better.
Do you think it makes a difference whether she's 9 or 12?
WHO ARE AMERICA’S OCCUPIERS?
THE LA RAZA “THE RACE” INVADERS:
AMERICA vs MEXICO: CLASHING CULTURES
By Frosty Wooldridge
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/02/obamas-amnesty-and-la-raza-child.html
Anyone understand why Mexicans fail at a successful culture?
Ever wonder why millions of them invade the United States in search of a better
life? Have you noticed that once they arrive, they create the same kind of
‘society’ in the United States? Unconsciously, they create the same conditions
they left behind. You can take the boy out of the ghetto, but you can't take
the ghetto out of the boy. For example, in Denver in December, illegal alien
Navi dragged his girlfriend to death behind his car. Illegal alien Cruz shot
his girlfriend dead in the back because she wouldn’t reconcile with him.
Illegal alien Ruizz ran over and killed Justin Goodman, but Ruizz drove away
from the scene leaving Goodman to die. In Greeley, Colorado they suffered 270
hit and run accidents in one year. Over 80 percent of hit and run wrecks in
Denver involve illegal aliens. Denver boasts the drug smuggling capital of the
West as well as the people smuggling mecca of the country. Illegals cheat,
distribute drugs, lie, forge documents, steal and kill as if it’s a normal way
of life. For them, it is. Mexico’s civilization stands diametrically opposed to
America’s culture. Both countries manifest different ways of thinking and
operating. With George Bush’s push to create the “Security and Prosperity
Partnership of North America” by dissolving our borders with Mexico, he places
all Americans at risk. Would you become friends with neighbors who throw their
trash on city streets and parks, create ghettoes wherever they enclave their
numbers, promote corruption, deal in violence, encourage drug use, manifest
poverty, endorse exism and downgrade education? America’s culture and Mexico ’s
culture remain diametrically opposed to one another. America’s fought Mexico
and won. Today, Mexico invades America with sheer numbers of poor. However,
cultures rarely change and neither do their people. As you can see from the ten
points below, everything about Mexico degrades everything about America. For
further information, you may visit www.immigrationshumancost.org and
www.limitstogrowth.org where you will find a plethora of information by a
brilliant journalist Brenda Walker. Her original report may be viewed on
www.Vdare.com on January 17, 2007 under the title: “Ten Reasons Why America
Should Not Marry Mexico.” I suggest you read more of her work. She exemplifies
incisive, sobering and shocking information. These ten point stem directly from
Brenda Walker’s work. Let’s examine why America must not entangle itself by
merging with Mexico. The legal age of sexual consent in Mexico is 12 years old.
Sex with children at this age and younger is socially acceptable in Mexico. For
example: A Mexican Lopez-Mendez pleaded guilty to sexual assault on a 10 year
old girl in West Virginia. His excuse: sex with young girls was common with his
people. He said, “I was unaware that it was a crime.” Mexicans remain the most
sexist males next to Islamic men. Both boast the most misogynous cultures in
the world. Rape and other violence toward women are not treated as serious
crimes. In Mexico, a custom known as “rapto” whereby men kidnap women for sex
is regarded as harmless amusement. Mexican society regards women little more
than objects. Crime and violence remain mainstays of Mexican culture. Drug
cartels and the Mexican army coordinate their massive efforts to promote drug
distribution not only in Mexico but into the USA. Mexico City suffers the
second highest crime rate in Latin America. Kidnapping remains second only to
Columbia for ransom money. Beheadings, killings and gun fire erupt at drug
distribution points on the US/Mexican border. Spontaneous hanging continues in
Mexico. A mob beat up and burned to death two policemen on live television in
2004 in Mexico City. As Brenda Walker wrote, “Mexicans do not have the same
belief as Americans that the law is central to the equitable functioning of a
complex nation. It’s the Third World.” Mexicans abhor education. In their
country, illiteracy dominates. As they arrive in our country, only 9.6 percent
of fourth generation Mexicans earn a high school diploma. Mexico does not
promote educational values. This makes them the least educated of any Americans
or immigrants. The rate of illiteracy in Mexico stands at 63 percent. Drunk
driving remains acceptable in Mexico. As it stands, 44,000 Americans die on our
nation’s highways annually. Half that number stems from drunken drivers. U.S.
Congressman Steve King reports that 13 American suffer death from drunken
driving Mexicans each day. Alcoholism runs rampant in Mexican culture. They
suffer the most DUI arrests. Mexicans set the benchmark for animal cruelty.
Mexicans love dog fighting, bullfighting, cock fighting and horse tripping.
Those blood sports play in every arena and backyard in Mexico. They expand into
America as more Mexicans arrive. They also engage in “steer-tailing” where the
rider yanks the animal’s tail in an attempt to flip it to the ground. In horse
tripping, they run the animals at full gallop around a ring, then, use ropes to
trip them at full speed. It’s a death sentence as the horses break their legs,
teeth, shoulders and necks—all to the delight of the cheering Mexican fans. As
La Raza confirms, Mexicans maintain the most racist society in North America .
“For the Hispanic race, everything; for anyone outside the race, nothing!”
Guadalupe Loaeza, a journalist, said, “Mexican society is fundamentally racist
and classist. The color of your skin is a key that either opens or shuts doors.
The lighter your skin, the more doors open to you.” Corruption becomes a
mechanism by which Mexico operates. Corruption remains systemic. The Washington
Post wrote, “Mexico is considered one of the most corrupt countries in the
hemisphere.” They feature drug cartels, sex slave trade, people smuggling, car
theft cartels, real estate scam cartels, murder for money and, you must bribe
your mail man to get your mail. Last, but not least, Mexicans are Marxists.
They promote a one party government. As with any kind of Marxism, brutal
totalitarian rule keeps the rich in power and everyone else subservient. As we
allow millions of Mexicans to colonize our country, we can’t help but be caught
up in these ten deadly cultural traits of Mexicans. With over 12 million
Mexicans here today, the predictions grow to as many as 20 even 40 million
Mexicans in a few decades as they come here for a better life. The fact
remains, as they come to America for a better life, they make our lives a
living hell.
THE AGENDA IS MEXICAN SUPREMACY!
The National Council of La Raza (NCLR) is not only one of the
wealthiest and most politically powerful militant
organizations in
the country, it is also notoriously racist and subversive.
The
group's name, "La Raza," means "The
Race," by which they are
referring to ethnic Mexicans, or more broadly to
"hispanics" or
"latinos." And it is quite clear from their decades
of vitriolic
rhetoric — both spoken and written — that the La Raza
activists
are trying to engender not only race consciousness amongst
hispanic U.S. citizens and Mexican migrants, but also racial
militancy and animosity toward "Gringo America."
FIFTEEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT LA RAZA “THE RACE” and
the LA RAZA DEMS’ PUSH TO EXPAND MEX SUPREMACY TO BUY THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES:
by Michelle Malkin
Only in America could critics of a group called "The
Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing identity
chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have succeeded in
redefining all opposition as "hate."
Both Barack Obama and John McCain will speak this week in San
Diego at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza, the Latino
organization whose name is Spanish for, yes, "The Race." Can you
imagine Obama and McCain paying homage to a group of white people who called
themselves that? No matter. The presidential candidates and the media have
legitimized "The Race" as a mainstream ethnic lobbying group and
marginalized its critics as intolerant bigots. The unvarnished truth is that
the group is a radical ethnic nationalist outfit that abuses your tax dollars
and milks PC politics to undermine our sovereignty.
*
Here are 15 things you should know about "The
Race":
*
15. "The Race" supports driver's licenses for
illegal aliens.
*
14."The Race" demands in-state tuition discounts
for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding U.S. citizens
and law-abiding legal immigrants.
*
13. "The Race" vehemently opposes cooperative
immigration enforcement efforts between local, state and federal authorities.
*
12. "The Race" opposes a secure fence on the
southern border.
*
11. "The Race" joined the American-Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee in a failed lawsuit attempt to prevent the feds
from entering immigration information into a key national crime database -- and
to prevent local police officers from accessing the data.
*
10. "The Race" opposed the state of Oklahoma's
tough immigration-enforcement-first laws, which cut off welfare to illegal
aliens, put teeth in employer sanctions and strengthened local-federal
cooperation and information sharing.
*
9. "The Race" joined other open-borders,
anti-assimilationists and sued to prevent Proposition 227, California's
bilingual education reform ballot initiative, from becoming law.
*
8. "The Race" bitterly protested common-sense voter
ID provisions as an "absolute disgrace."
*
7. "The Race" has consistently opposed post-9/11
national security measures at every turn.
*
6. Former "Race" president Raul Yzaguirre, Hillary
Clinton's Hispanic outreach adviser, said this: "U.S. English is to
Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks." He was referring to U.S.
English, the nation's oldest, largest citizens' action group dedicated to
preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United States.
"The Race" also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and advised
the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while avoiding
the terms "illegal" and "amnesty."
*
5. "The Race" gives mainstream cover to a poisonous
subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de
Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA). The late GOP Rep.
Charlie Norwood rightly characterized the organization as "a radical
racist group … one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has
permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a
racist nation out of the American West."
*
4. "The Race" is currently leading a smear campaign
against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called for TV and cable
news networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off the airwaves -- in
addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut up their foes. The
New York Times reported that current "Race" president Janet Murguia
believes "hate speech" should "not be tolerated, even if such
censorship were a violation of First Amendment rights."
*
3. "The Race" sponsors militant ethnic nationalist
charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars (at least $8 million in
federal education grants). The schools include Aztlan Academy in Tucson, Ariz.,
the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, Ariz., Academia Cesar Chavez Charter School
in St. Paul, Minn., and La Academia Semillas del Pueblo in Los Angeles, whose
principal inveighed: "We don't want to drink from a White water fountain,
we have our own wells and our natural reservoirs and our way of collecting rain
in our aqueducts. We don't need a White water fountain … ultimately the White
way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of life will eventually
lead to our own destruction."
*
2. "The Race" has perfected the art of the PC
shakedown at taxpayer expense, pushing relentlessly to lower home loan
standards for Hispanic borrowers, reaping millions in federal "mortgage
counseling" grants, seeking special multimillion-dollar earmarks and
partnering with banks that do business with illegal aliens.
*
1. "The Race" thrives on ethnic supremacy -- and
the elite sheeple's unwillingness to call it what it is. As historian Victor
Davis Hanson observes: "[The] organization's very nomenclature 'The
National Council of La Raza' is hate speech to the core. Despite all the
contortions of the group, Raza (as its Latin cognate suggests) reflects the
meaning of 'race' in Spanish, not 'the people' -- and that's precisely why we
don't hear of something like 'The National Council of the People,' which would
not confer the buzz notion of ethnic, racial and tribal chauvinism."
*
The fringe is the center. The center is the fringe. Viva La
Raza.
*
“Wherever there’s a Mexican, there is Mexico!”... President
Calderone. As an American living under Spanish speaking Mexican occupation, I
would add to this “Where there’s a Mexican, there’s a violent Mexican gang!”
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General We are practicing
"La Reconquista" in California."
LA RAZA GANG BITCH MARIA “CHATA”
LEON… A MEX MOMMA OPERATING
HER
OWN MASSIVE DRUG CARTEL IN LA
RAZA-OCCUPIED MEXIFORNIA
“In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll declared that the vast
majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans. [22.2] Mexico is a country
saturated with racism, yet in denial, having never endured the social
development of a Civil Rights movement like in the US--Blacks are harshly
treated while foreign Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In fact,
racism as workplace discrimination can be seen across the US anywhere the
illegal alien Latino works--the vast majority of the workforce is usually
strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites, Asians, and others.”
Times Staff Writers
Over the next half-century,
California's
population will explode by nearly 75%, and
Riverside will surpass
its bigger neighbors to
become the second most populous county after
Los
Angeles, according to state Department of
Finance projections released Monday.
California
will near the 60-million mark in 2050, the study found, raising
questions about how the state will look and function and where all the people
and their cars will go. Dueling visions pit the iconic California building
block of ranch house, big yard and two-car garage against more dense, high-rise
development. But whether sprawl or skyscrapers win the day, the Golden State
will probably be a far different and more complex place than it is today, as
people live longer and Latinos become the dominant ethnic group, eclipsing all
others combined. Some critics forecast disaster if gridlock and environmental
impacts are not averted. Others see a possible economic boon, particularly for
retailers and service industries with an eye on the state as a burgeoning
market. "It's opportunity with baggage," said Jack Kyser, chief
economist for the Los Angeles County Economic Development Corp., in "a
country masquerading as a state. "Other demographers argue that the huge
population increase the state predicts will occur only if officials complete
major improvements to roads and other public infrastructure. Without that
investment, they say, some Californians would flee the state. If the finance
department's calculations hold, California's population will rise from 34.1
million in 2000 to 59.5 million at the mid-century point, about the same number
of people as Italy has today. And its projected growth rate in those 50 years
will outstrip the national rate — nearly 75% compared with less than 50%
projected by the federal government. That could translate to increased
political clout in Washington, D.C. Southern California's population is
projected to grow at a rate of more than 60%, according to the new state figures,
reaching 31.6 million by mid-century. That's an increase of 12.1 million over
just seven counties. L.A. County alone will top 13 million by 2050, an increase
of almost 3.5 million residents. And Riverside County — long among the
fastest-growing in the state — will triple in population to 4.7 million by
mid-century. Riverside County will add 3.1 million people, according to the new
state figures, eclipsing Orange and San Diego to become the second most
populous in the state. With less expensive housing than the coast, Riverside
County has grown by more than 472,000 residents since 2000, according to state
estimates. No matter how much local governments build in the way of public
works and how many new jobs are attracted to the region — minimizing the need
for long commutes — Housing figures that growth will still overwhelm the area's
roads. USC Professor Genevieve Giuliano, an expert on land use and
transportation, would probably agree. Such massive growth, if it occurs, she
said, will require huge investment in the state's highways, schools, and energy
and sewer systems at a "very formidable cost."If those things aren't
built, Giuliano questioned whether the projected population increases will
occur. "Sooner or later, the region will not be competitive and the growth
is not going to happen," she said.If major problems like traffic
congestion and housing costs aren't addressed, Giuliano warned, the middle
class is going to exit California, leaving behind very high-income and very
low-income residents. "It's a political question," said Martin Wachs,
a transportation expert at the Rand Corp. in Santa Monica. "Do we have the
will, the consensus, the willingness to pay? If we did, I think we could manage
the growth. "The numbers released Monday underscore most demographers'
view that the state's population is pushing east, from both Los Angeles and the
Bay Area, to counties such as Riverside and San Bernardino as well as half a
dozen or so smaller Central Valley counties. Sutter County, for example, is
expected to be the fastest-growing on a percentage basis between 2000 and 2050,
jumping 255% to a population of 282,894 , the state said. Kern County is
expected to see its population more than triple to 2.1 million by mid-century.
In Southern California, San Diego County is projected to grow by almost 1.7
million residents and Orange County by 1.1 million. Even Ventura County — where
voters have imposed some limits on urban sprawl — will see its population jump
62% to more than 1.2 million if the projections hold. The Department of Finance
releases long-term population projections every three years. Between the last
two reports, number crunchers have taken a more detailed look at California's
statistics and taken into account the likelihood that people will live longer,
said chief demographer Mary Heim. The result? The latest numbers figure the
state will be much more crowded than earlier estimates (by nearly 5 million)
and that it will take a bit longer than previously thought for Latinos to
become the majority of California's population: 2042, not 2038. The figures
show that the majority
of California's growth will be in the
Latino population, said
Dowell Myers, a professor of urban
planning and demography
at USC, adding that "68% of the
growth this decade will be
Latino, 75% next and 80% after
that."That should be a wake-up call for voting Californians, Myers said,
pointing out a critical disparity. Though the state's growth is young and
Latino, the majority of voters will be older and white — at least for the next
decade." The future of the state is Latino growth," Myers said.
"We'd sure better invest in them and get them up to speed. Older white
voters don't see it that way. They don't realize that someone has to replace
them in the work force, pay for their benefits and buy their house."
No comments:
Post a Comment