Another prominent Democrat who supports the
anti-capitalist Occupy movement is a self-declared
communist named Bill Ayers, in whose living
room Barack Obama launched his political career.
“Make no mistake about it: the Latino community holds this election in your
hands. Some of the closest contests this November will be in states like
Florida, Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico -- states with large Latino
populations.” PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA
“I know how powerful this community is. Just think how powerful you could
be on November 4th if you translate your numbers into votes.” PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA
Red Tide Rising
On September 21, a protest was held in Aurora, Colorado demanding abolishment of U.S. borders and the Immigration & Customs Enforcement agency. Over the last three years, a myriad of similar anti-ICE, open-border demonstrations have been held in cities across America, all of which have been encouraged and supported, tacitly or otherwise, by the Democratic Party.
One of several Democratic front groups that participated in the protest calls itself the Party for Socialism and Liberation/Denver. To make sure its Marxist ideology doesn’t go unnoticed, the group’s Facebook page reads “Building a Worker’s Paradise in the Heartland of World Imperialism.” PSL/Denver’s name includes the word socialism, but the communist flag flown at its Aurora protest shows that to this profoundly anti-American group, socialism and communism are heads of the same snake.
The open borders demonstration was also attended by members of Rocky Mountain Antifa and Denver Communists, two other openly Marxist Democrat front groups. In this video, a member of Denver Communists confirms that the protestors are demanding elimination of U.S. borders and an end to enforcement of U.S. immigration law. An image on the group’s Facebook
page shows members carrying a banner
demanding no borders and no nations.
A borderless world without nations represents the culmination of the communist dream of a world united under the banner of the hammer and sickle. For that dream to be realized, America’s sovereignty must be yielded to an international governing body run by the UN, a one-world globalist organization run by an international assortment of socialists-cum-communists. Those who call for a borderless world with no nations are effectively calling for a permanent end to the United States in favor of a “new world order,” a world where Americans would be indoctrinated to no longer see themselves as citizens of their country, but as Citizens of the World.
Occupy Denver is another anti-capitalist group that showed up for the demonstration in Aurora. Hundreds of Occupy affiliates are active in cities, towns and campuses across America. Like other Democrat identity politics groups, Occupy affiliates are openly pro-communist -- Occupy Denver’s Facebook profile picture contains an image of “the Raised Fist,” one of communism’s most recognizable call to arms. Like other Democrat front groups, Occupy Denver helps the Democratic Party advance its hostility toward the police by mocking and ridiculing law enforcement officers, as shown in this photo on the group’s Facebook. Another photo on the group’s Facebook supports the Democrats’ class warfare election strategy with an ‘us vs. them’ propaganda graphic declaring that the poor in America are exploited victims of oppression, who therefore have a right to “destroy the system,” by violence if necessary. Victim vs. oppressor ideology is the means of achieving political power outlined in The Communist Manifesto.
The ties that bind the modern Democratic Party to pro-communist groups and organizations are unmistakable. Nowhere is that more evident than its ties to the Occupy movement. At an Aug. 19, 2012 pre-rally “People’s Assembly” meeting in the nation’s capitol, former labor boss/lifelong Democrat Mike Golash, leader of Occupy DC and a member of the openly-communist Progressive Labor Party, left no doubt about the intent of the Occupy movement when he was caught on video telling student occupiers “Our goal is to make revolution in the United States, overthrow the capitalist system and build communism in America.”
Another prominent Democrat who supports the
anti-capitalist Occupy movement is a self-declared
communist named Bill Ayers, in whose living
room Barack Obama launched his political career.
And, when Occupy Wall Street protests burst on the scene in 2011, the two most high profile Democrats in America -- President Obama (“We are on their side”) and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (“God bless them”) -- enthusiastically supported the 99% vs. the 1%, victim vs. oppressor protests, as did virtually every other high level official in the Democratic Party.
The Aurora protestors who demanded no borders and no nations -- and millions more like them who share their borderless world ideology -- have three things in common:
● They all are Americans who harbor deep contempt for their country.
● They all are communist revolutionaries committed to overthrowing America’s two-party capitalist system by any means necessary.
● They all support and are supported by the modern Democratic Party, a once-patriotic party that has quietly defected to the side of the hammer and sickle.
The choice you face in 2020
Overwhelming evidence shows that the red tide of communism is rising in America, and rapidly so. Whether it succeeds in upending our constitutional republic will be determined by the next national elections.
An electrical engineering graduate of Georgia Tech and now retired, John Eidson is a freelance writer in Atlanta.
CAN YOU THINK OF EVEN ON
THING BARACK OBAMA DID FOR BLACK AMERICA EVEN AS HE OPERATED 'LA RAZA' OUT
OF THE WHITE HOUSE?
Michelle Obama castigates
whites for ‘running from us’
Speaking at an event in
Chicago called the “Obama Foundation Summit” (were any heads of state
present?), Michelle Obama let slip her resentment of white people. The grudge goes
back to her childhood, and she does not seem to see much progress in the
behavior she attributes to Caucasian-Americans. Fox News reports what the New York Times
doesn’t:
White
Americans are “still running” elsewhere when minorities and immigrants move
into their communities, Michelle Obama observed
Tuesday. (snip)
In a
sit-down interview with journalist Isabel Wilkerson, in which Obama was
accompanied by her brother, Craig Robinson, an executive with the NBA’s New
York Knicks, Obama described when she first became conscious of what’s been
called “white flight.”
We
were doing everything we were supposed to do – and better,” Obama said of her
family, recalling when they got a new address on Chicago’s South Side. “But
when we moved in, white families moved out.
“I
want to remind white folks that y’all were running from us,” she continued,
according to the Chicago
Sun-Times. “And you’re still running.”
This is remarkably
un-self-aware, considering that the Obamas currently reside in Kalorama and
Martha’s Vineyard. How many blacks live near their two mansions?
“I
can’t make people not afraid of black people,” she said, according to The
Hill. “I don’t know what’s going on. I can’t explain what’s happening
in your head."
Maybe what’s going on in the
heads of white people is the same as what was going on in Jesse Jackson’s head
when he said:
“There
is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the
street and hear footsteps... then turn around and see somebody white and feel
relieved.”
It would be wonderful if
black crime rates were similar to those of whites and Asians, but they aren’t.
That’s is why many minorities flee from ghettos as soon as they are financially
able – a group that includes Barack and Michelle Obama.
Mrs. Obama is stoking racial
resentment with her remarks, an emotion that the Democrats use as part of their
electoral strategy to drive black turnout.
At least her statement
castigating whites is consistent with her oft-expressed position that she has
“zero interest” in running for president.
Here is video of her remarks
on race:
Hat tip: Ed Lasky
"That
phase of the takeover was started in 2008 by President Barack
Obama. Throughout his eight years in office, Obama practiced
divisiveness and hammered away at the Second Amendment while pouring gallons of
fuel on the fire of the "Black Lives Matter" lie. His
administration was rampant with corruption, pushing the envelope with every new
scandal." RICK HAYES
October 3, 2019
The Political Civil War is
real
The
American Political Civil War, which began in November 2016, has so far
witnessed leftist Democrats initiating a series of unsuccessful offensive
maneuvers against the president and his allies. The unrelenting
Russian collusion bombardment did not produce the shock and awe promised by
leftist operatives such as Adam Schiff, Chuck Schumer, and Nancy
Pelosi. And so a new front was opened up against the president,
having the appearance of impeachment proceedings that dealt with a routine
phone call from President Trump to the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky.
Sometimes
aggression must be met head on, with resolve to stop it in its
tracks. History reviles Neville Chamberlain not because he was
unsuccessful in halting German expansion, but because he couldn't identify or
didn't want to acknowledge the clear evidence of imminent war.
Chamberlain's
self-deception and fear helped pave the way in allowing an aggressor to gather
strength and strike when he had amassed enough power. In the same
way, it was the self-deception and cowardice of Republican members of Congress
that allowed the Democrat impeachment machine to gain control of the House
during the midterm elections.
But
the leftist Democratic Party has taken a different approach toward total
political and social conquest. Unlike the German war machine that
promised peace but delivered war, leftist Democrats do not promise any
compromises. Instead, they are openly mobilizing for political war
and are prepared to deliver on that threat, no matter the cost to the country.
And
to be clear, it will continue to be an all-out, extremely aggressive assault on
the president and any American who wants nothing more than to live in peace and
raise a family. To pretend that what is happening today is merely
dirty politics as usual would be the equivalent of British citizens identifying
descending V-1 rockets in the battle of Britain as no more than pesky
mosquitoes.
It
is, thus far, a bloodless, political civil war to change America
forever. And it has already seen a coup attempt against the
president by the Left that desires a winner-take-all conclusion. And
because Leftist Democrats never conceived that anyone other than a person they
selected would become president, the rules, laws, and language must change and
contort to fit their agenda so they can finally seize power. Once in
power, the rules and laws dictated by the Left will become unrecognizable, and
there will be no bridge to cross to get back to the Constitution.
Politically
speaking, these leftist radicals have proven that they will attack all those
who want to remain living in a Republic. As in every past revolution
into socialism, the socialist victors demand complete obedience from the
conquered.
In
their own words, leftist Democrats confirm that they are counting on a
misinformed public in order to gain power. Take, as an example, the
statement made by Jonathan Gruber, the architect of Obamacare, where he brags
to a group of people how in order to pass Obamacare he relied on "the
stupidity of the American voter." Although Gruber doesn't
explain how the American voter becomes so "stupid," the evidence is
clear that the corrupt, indoctrinating media play a crucial
role. They dole out misinformation and deceit, as does the leftist
education system.
There
are no more pretenses, as the corrupt major media have all but announced their
alliance with the far left's aggressive goals. An article in the
October 2018 edition of Investor's
Business Daily points out this blatant one-sided absurdity that passes for
today's media:
To say that the big networks haven't exactly had
a love affair with Donald Trump, as they did with President Obama, is an understatement.
A new survey shows that not only is coverage of Trump overwhelmingly negative,
but the President's biggest accomplishment — the roaring economy — gets almost
no attention.
The
article goes on to say Trump receives 92% negative coverage and that the Media
Research Center watched network TV for four months and found that the coverage
surrounding Trump's economic boom was only 0.7% of the entire coverage.
It
cannot be overstated that for America to "change," there had to be a
push to revoke some or all of the Bill of Rights. That phase of the
takeover was started in 2008 by President Barack Obama. Throughout
his eight years in office, Obama practiced divisiveness and hammered away at
the Second Amendment while pouring gallons of fuel on the fire of the
"Black Lives Matter" lie. His administration was rampant
with corruption, pushing the envelope with every new scandal. Only
because outsider citizen Trump became President Trump do we now know that there
was no chance that justice would have ever been served for the victims of the
scandals of Benghazi, the IRS, and Fast and Furious while Obama was in
office. Just like the leftist Democrats of today, Obama was
protected by America's version of Pravda.
The
ongoing coup attempt against President Trump and his administration will
continue. The American people will get deluged with fake news and
lies from hostile media sources. There still exists a sliver of hope
in the name of William Barr. But even Barr holding a winning hand is
not enough to turn the tide against the waves of corruption slamming into
America. It will also take the selfless efforts of the average
American who demands liberty. It will take the courage and grit of
ordinary men and women to secure a victory — not just for the president, but
for America's bright future and the joy of living in ultimate freedom.
Mecha's (M.E.Ch.A.) own slogan reads, "For the race
everything. For those outside the race, nothing." (CALIFORNIA’S ATTORNEY
GENERAL XAVIER BECERRA IS A MEMBER OF THE MEX FASCIST SEPARATIST MOVEMENT OF
M.E.Ch.A.)
LA
RAZA: The Mexican Fascist Party of LA RAZA “THE RACE” and the Reconquista and
surrender of America to NARCOMEX
VIVA
LA RAZA SUPREMACY?
The comparison to the Nazi
Party is well deserved. La Raza openly supports pushing all but Latino
Americans out of a portion of the United States (ethnic cleansing), they call
for 'Reconquista' or the re-conquest of the American Southwest by Mexico (the
re-occupation of the Sudetanland), and the establishment of 'Atzlan' which is
the utopian all-Latino version of the American Southwestern states (Adolf Hitler
planned to called his utopia Germania).
"Despite the fact that the majority
of documented hispanics oppose illegal immigration, as do the majority of
Americans, Aztlan and La Raza race hate groups have become the
self-appointed voice for a separatist movement that threatens a violent
overthrow of the Constitutional system and a barbaric program of ethnic
cleansing. This is held up by the media as 'diversity' and to vociferously
oppose it is scorned as racism."
Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General We are
practicing "La Reconquista" in California."
"We’ve got an even more ominous enemy within our borders that promotes “Reconquista of Aztlan” or the reconquest of California, Arizona,
New Mexico and Texas into the country of
Mexico."
"Remember 187 -- the Proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services
to non-citizens --- was the last gasp of white America in California." --- Art Torres,
Chairman of the California Democratic Party… NOW THE PARTY for LA RAZA
SUPREMACY… do a search for Barack Obama and LA RAZA.
"The American Southwest
seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a
single shot." --- Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico
“The watchdogs at Judicial Watch discovered documents that
reveal how the Obama administration's close coordination with the Mexican
government entices Mexicans to hop over the fence and on to the American dole.” Washington Times
“Make no mistake about it: the Latino community holds this election in your
hands. Some of the closest contests this November will be in states like
Florida, Colorado, Nevada and New Mexico -- states with large Latino
populations.” PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA
“I know how powerful this community is. Just think how powerful you could
be on November 4th if you translate your numbers into votes.” PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA
SCRATCH THE SURFACE OF BARACK OBAMA IS A PRO-MUSLIM,
ANTI-AMERICAN, ANTI-CHRISTIAN, ANTI-JEWISH DICTATOR IN THE MAKING FOR GLOBALIST
BANKSTERS AND BILLIONAIRES.
When
Obama found religion (or feigned the motions of doing so for future
electability), he chose out of the near 1,000 available options to
him in Chicago a church whose pastor was an outspoken anti-American,
anti-white, and anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist. For the next 20 years,
Obama and Michelle chose to sit in the pews of that swine and devour the filth
he shoveled out from the trough at his altar.
The Crisis Obama Let Go to Waste
Barack
Obama's legacy is nothing if not consequential. In his decades as
"community organizer" among Chicago's poorest, most desperate
neighborhoods, he did nothing other than perpetuate complete dependence on Big
Brother. His Affordable Care Act, and its accompanying criminal penalties
for not engaging in commerce, scythed a mile-wide berth into
the already frayed concept of a citizenry living free from government coercion.
More ominously, Obama was able to entwine his instinctive Marxism with
a vision for America's path forward in a way his predecessors had been unable
to.
The
singular cunning of Obama was his success in realigning the "victim"
hierarchy almost completely from class to race. Free citizens in a market
society can climb or descend the social ladder, but race remains a constant
throughout. Race is our most recognizable difference, no matter its
superficial nature. In the deepest recesses of our prejudices, race is
pure tribalism. And in the darkest hours of human history, at our most
trying moments, and during our most vicious wars, people of all tribes have
taken refuge not within their class, but within their race or ethnicity.
The examples of Nazi Germany, of Bosnia, of Rwanda, and of the Armenians
in Turkey are but a few examples of the horrors lifelong friends and neighbors
of the same class can inflict on one another in the name of racial identity
politics.
This
isn't to say Marxism hasn't been peddled before under the guise of racial
identity grievance. Indeed, Lenin himself was able to provoke satellite
regions like Ukraine and Kazakhstan to revolt from czarist Russia in the name
of ethnic separatism. In the United States, it has been tried repeatedly
since the 1960s. But as our nation's first (half) black president, Obama
was able sow division with absolute authority, and with minimal criticism by a
political class that either openly supported his aims or was petrified of
soliciting unsubstantiated accusations of racism.
And
sow division he did, with every chance he got.
When
Obama found religion (or feigned the motions of doing so for future
electability), he chose out of the near 1,000 available options to him in Chicago a
church whose pastor was an outspoken anti-American, anti-white, and
anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist. For the next 20 years, Obama and
Michelle chose to sit in the pews of that swine and devour the filth he
shoveled out from the trough at his altar. When asked to justify
his close association with this shameless bigot, Obama shrugged off such
concerns, comparing Wright to "an
old uncle who sometimes will say things that I don't agree with."
Obama distanced himself from Wright only when it started affecting his poll
numbers.
When
armed Black Panthers were caught threatening voters outside a Philadelphia
polling station in 2008, the Department of Justice under the Bush
administration charged (and convicted) them with violations of the Voting
Rights Act. Once in office, Obama had political appointees in the
DOJ dismiss the charges.
When
Cambridge Police (both white and black, not that it should matter) arrested his
black friend Henry Gates for disorderly conduct, Obama, after admitting that he
didn't know all the facts, stated that the police
"acted stupidly."
After
Trayvon Martin was shot by Afro-Peruvian (AKA "white Hispanic")
George Zimmerman, Obama intoned, "If I had a son,
he'd look like Trayvon." This implies that Martin was shot because
he was black, and not because he was repeatedly pummeling Zimmerman's head into
the pavement. Even Eric Holder's investigation concluded otherwise.
After
black nationalist Xavier Micah Johnson opened fire and murdered five Dallas
police officers in 2016 (as they protected a Black Lives Matter march), Obama
gave a eulogy at their funeral. The eulogy itself stands as perhaps one
of the most despicable moments of the Obama presidency. He used the
podium to equate the murder of the
Dallas police officers with the recent shootings of Alton Sterling and Philando
Castile (both of which were investigated and found justifiable, and neither man
was "unfairly targeted" because he was black, as Obama asserted).
It
was a speech as deft as it was cynical. Reading through the text, one
realizes more clearly the manipulation taking place that, when spoken, is less
detectable. He subtly but unmistakably steers the speech from a tribute
to the murdered officers to a damning indictment of our alleged systemic
racism, coupled with a defense of the paranoid style of the Black Lives Matter
movement. By the end of the speech, Obama had skillfully twisted the
events to the point where theoretical, faceless white racism was to blame for
the actual, documented racism of Xavier Johnson.
One
wonders if, had he attended Sterling's funeral, he would have lectured the
audience about murdered police.
At
this point, I must interject a side note regarding the aforementioned
shootings. Philando Castile was shot in a horrible case of mistaken identity. He closely
matched the description of a suspect from a recent armed robbery, and the
officer thought he was reaching for a gun he admitted to having. Alton
Sterling (who had a long arrest record that included
battery, burglary, and weapons charges) was shot because he was physically
fighting with police, despite being tasered several times. Police shot
him when he reached for the loaded .38 caliber revolver in his pants. His
shooting was completely warranted, and Baton Rouge is a safer place without
him. Neither the tragic shooting of Castile nor the justified shooting of
Sterling can in any reasonable way be attributed to racism, nor can they be
remotely likened to the premeditated slaughter of the five Dallas
officers. But such are the dots that Obama connected to hustle his race
narrative.
Obama
is notoriously thin-skinned to criticism, or to the suggestion that someone,
somewhere, might be smarter than he. This is the guy who claimed, with a straight face,
that he was a better speechwriter than his speechwriters, more knowledgeable
about policy than his policy directors, and a better political director than
his political director. Still, one assumes he was adroit enough to recognize
that objections to his policies, or questions of their constitutionality, were
not the default reactions of repressed racism. If he had thought they
were, he would have said so. On a fundamental level, Obama understands
that America is not the systemically racist cesspool he allowed it to be
portrayed as under his watch. Yet he was Machiavellian enough to let this
yarn spin itself for the purpose of political advantage.
Obama
also understood the political pitfalls inherent in hiding behind the race card
in efforts to deflect policy debates he could not win. So he did one
better. He let his media sycophants do it for him. For the duration
of his presidency and beyond, these shrieking curs claw the flesh off their
faces at the slightest hint of criticism of Obama, his policies, or his style
of governance. I am unaware of a single instance in which he publicly
censured his groupies for their utter lack of nuance.
Therein
lies the biggest tragedy of Obama's legacy. As a biracial president, he
had a foot in both black and white America. He was uniquely positioned to
use this to the advantage of the entire country, to serve as a bridge of
healing and progress between races who have butted heads for far too long.
Instead, for eight continuous years, he chose to do the exact
opposite. He entrenched identity politics as deeply as he could, ripping
open wounds in the process, and divided this great nation perhaps past the
point of no return. He did this to spread a thoroughly debunked ideology,
the achievability of which his ego will never allow him to
admit he was mistaken about.
In
a 2008 speech in which Obama attempted to justify Jeremiah Wright's irrational
hatred, he said, "At times, that
anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to
make up for a politician's own failings." Never before has a poker
player so inadvertently revealed his own hand. When Obama spoke those
words, he was no doubt doing what he does best: thinking of himself.
Pollak: Barack Obama Wrote the Playbook on
Political Division
Left-wing pundits have accused President
Donald Trump of using his tweets last weekend to launch a divisive re-election
campaign.
David Axelrod, former adviser to
President Barack Obama, tweeted: “With his
deliberate, racist outburst, @realDonaldTrump wants to raise the profile of his
targets, drive Dems to defend them and make them emblematic of the entire
party. It’s a cold, hard strategy.”
That is debatable — but if so,
Axelrod should know; Obama did it first.
By 2011, Obama knew that re-election
would be difficult. The Tea Party had just led the Republicans to a historic
victory in the 2010 midterm elections, winning the House and nearly taking the
Senate. The economy was only growing sluggishly, and Obama’s stimulus had
failed to keep unemployment below eight percent, as projected. Moreover, the
passage of Obamacare had provoked a backlash against Obama’s state-centered
model of American society.
Facing a similar situation in the
mid-1990s, President Bill Clinton had “triangulated,” moving back toward the
middle, frustrating the GOP by taking up their issues, such as welfare reform.
But Obama rejected that approach.
Having watched his icon, Chicago mayor Harold Washington, settle for an
incremental approach when faced with opposition in the 1980s, only to die of a
sudden heart attack before fulfilling his potential, Obama chose the path of
hard-left policy — and divide-and-rule politics.
The first hint of his strategy
emerged during the debt ceiling negotiations in the summer of August 2011. As
Bob Woodward recounted in his book
about the crisis, The Price
of Politics, then-Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) had
wanted to reach a “grand bargain” with the president on long-term spending
cuts. But Obama blew up that agreement by demanding $400 billion in new taxes,
to his aides’ surprise. Obama wanted an opponent, not a deal. (Last week,
Boehner told Breitbart News
Tonight that Obama’s decision was his worst disappointment in
35 years of politics.)
In the fall of 2011, a new left-wing
movement, Occupy Wall Street, was launched. A mix of communists, anarchists,
and digital pranksters, the Occupy movement cast American society as a
struggle between the “99 percent” and the “one percent.”
Obama and then-House Minority
Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA)
embraced the movement — and failed to distance themselves from it even as
it collapsed into
violence, sexual assault, and confrontations with police.
Instead, Obama picked up on Occupy’s
themes and used them to shape his campaign.
In December 2011, Obama gave a speech at
Osawatomie, Kansas — a place steeped in radical
symbolism — at which he doubled down on his left-wing policies. He focused on
the issue of economic inequality, and attacked the idea that the free market
could lift the middle class to prosperity. “This isn’t about class warfare.
This is about the nation’s welfare,” he insisted.
Then, in the spring of 2012, Obama
made a controversial play on race. When a black teen, Trayvon Martin, was
killed in Florida during a scuffle with neighborhood watch volunteer George
Zimmerman, Al Sharprton — who was serving as an informal adviser to Obama at
the time — made the local crime story
into a national racial controversy. Obama, following Sharpton’s lead, weighed
in: “If I had a son, he’d look like Trayvon,” Obama said at the time.
Poll numbers suggest that race
relations, which had been improving, dropped precipitously after that. But to
Obama, it was worth it: the campaign needed to find a way to motivate minority
voters. (Vice President Joe Biden did his part, telling black voters
that GOP nominee Mitt Romney was “gonna put y’all in chains.”)
Trump is pushing a non-racial,
nationalist message. But if he actually wanted to divide America for political
gain, he could learn from the master.
Joel B.
Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He earned an A.B. in Social
Studies and Environmental Science and Public Policy from Harvard. He is a
winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. He is also the
co-author of How Trump Won: The Inside
Story of a Revolution, which is available from Regnery. Follow him on Twitter
at @joelpollak.
Heading for civil war
Donald Trump’s opponents are completely
unhinged. The hate and slander directed towards the president and his
supporters is off the charts. The vitriol comes not just from the Democrat
party, the media, and the world of entertainment, but also from a sizable
proportion of the federal bureaucracy and many seemingly ordinary
people.
The media coordinates this campaign and
amplifies the hate at every opportunity. Media twist every event, be it big
or small, into a criticism of the president. The goal is always to present
Trump in not just an unfavorable light but to make him appear too loathsome for
polite society. And Trump is not the sole target of this demonization. It is
directed at his supporters, too.
Where will all this lead? No less
than Angelo M. Codevilla fears it could ultimately result in a bloody civil
war. And if it comes to that, there's no doubt where he places the blame.
The story of the contemporary American
Left's sponsorship of hate and violence began around 1964, when the Democrats
chose to abandon the Southern constituencies that had been its mainstay since
the time of Jefferson and Jackson. In less than a decade, the party found
itself increasingly dependent on gaining super-majorities among
blacks, upscale liberals, and constituencies of resentment in general
-- and hence on stoking their hate.
For the past half century, America's
political history has been driven by the Democrats' effort to fire up
these constituencies by denigrating the rest of America.
Codevilla notes that prominent Democrats
like Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Hillary Clinton have led millions of their
followers "to think and act as if conservatives were simply a lower level
of humanity, and should have their faces rubbed in their own inferiority."
It’s not surprising that many ordinary
followers have concluded that harassing conservatives in restaurants, airports,
and public functions is "not just permissible but praiseworthy,
and if thousands of persons who exercise power over cities, towns, and schools
have not concluded that facilitating such harassment and harm is their duty."
This is the toxic environment that the
Democrats, in conjunction with the media, have created. Has Pandora's box been
opened? Are we beyond the point of no return? Are leftists and their liberal
soulmates too obtuse not to expect that hate and violence will someday be
answered in kind? These questions are up in the air. Right now, one thing is
clear. As Yeats wrote: "The best lack all conviction while the worse
are full of passionate intensity."
Codevilla's worry about a civil war
dovetails with The Fourth Turning,: What the Cycles of History Tell
Us About American's Next Rendezvous with Destiny (1997) by William Strauss
and Neil Howe. To my reading, these authors predict a Fourth Turning Crisis
period around the years 2020-2022. Then, many things that Americans have always
taken for granted will unravel.
Just to touch on a few of the changes that
Strauss and Howe see: today's soft criminal justice system will become swift
and rough. Vagrants will be rounded up and the mentally ill recommitted.
Criminal appeals shortened and executions hastened. Pension funds will go
bust and Social Security checks become iffy. The full spectrum of society
will be under distress. All the problems will be combined into one -- the
survival of society.
Aren't the seeds already planted for a
crisis? Trust in Washington and in government institutions is at an all-time
low. Political violence is tacitly condoned and often openly encouraged by
Democratic officeholders. The political establishment encourages massive Illegal
immigration. The
mainstream media is highly partisan and corrupt beyond reform. The American
flag, the country's history, and even its nationhood are openly
despised in universities. American public schools are a disgrace despite
the money poured into them. The country is burdened by a $22 trillion
national debt to which many trillions more of unfunded government liabilities
must be added. Students owe a trillion dollars in school loans that can never
be repaid.
Someday there has to be a reckoning for
all this dysfunction. Irrespective of the election results in 2020, the time
frame of 2020-2022 sounds about the right for things to come to a head. It
would be prudent to be ready.
Hatred is Hatred,
whether from the Left or Right
The Reverend Not So
Sharpton is not considered a hater. He was much sought after by 12
of the Democrat presidential candidates, who made the pilgrimage to his humble abode to kiss his
ring.
When it was time to renew
his television show, his credentials were examined (but the ratings were
ignored), and yes, he was qualified because he is still black. That
seems to be the reason Al is a television star. Al is paid $500,000 annually by MSNBC for his television
work, and he pays himself over $200,000 from his civil rights non-profit
organization.
You might think a
television star with a net worth of up to $5 million and annual income of over
$700,000 could pay his bills, but Al still owes $4.5 million in
state and federal taxes, and he often forgets "to pay travel agencies,
hotels, and landlords," according to the records. In 2015, Al
paid almost $2 million on his back taxes.
In 2004, Al bought
himself a Rolls-Royce Phantom for his 50th birthday. That is the
most expensive production car in the world, with a base price of $475,000.
That is one Baptist who
was not held under water long enough!
Just kidding, but he is
not my kind of Baptist.
A black killer in Dallas
who killed five police officers and injured 14 other innocent people said,
"I want to kill white people, especially white cops." When
asked if the shooting should be considered a hate crime, President Obama said,
"It's hard to know what his motives are." Can't Obama
understand clear English? The killer was a hater, and his race or
political position did not matter. By being a defender of hate, does
that make Obama a hater?
It seems hate is
identified depending on the hater and the hatee.
A French rapper
named Nick Conrad has
a song titled "Hang Whites!"
that declares, "I enter day care centres, I kill white babies, Grab them
quickly and hang their parents, Take them apart to pass the
time." In one scene, the rapper and an associate drag a white
person along a street and kick him in the head. The lyrics include
calls to kill white people and their children.
That's hate by a
self-described "black artist, Parisian, proud sophisticate" — or more
precisely, a French jerk who shot to fame with his hate-filled
"song."
Thaddeus Matthews,
Memphis disc jockey, interviewing Charlotte Bergmann, a black,
female conservative Republican candidate for Congress, called her a
"token negro" and "curly-haired nigga." He
added, "I'm so sick of your s---, yourself, and I'm about to put
your a-- up outta here," he said. "You are a token
negro that white folk have control over." As she got up to
leave, she tried to shake his hand, and he refused, saying, "I don't need
to shake your hand. I'm scared because some of that whiteness might
rub off on me."
Thad, the black hater of
whites, is still a disc jockey in Memphis. Charlotte won her primary
but lost in the 2018 general election.
The mother of Michael
Brown (the teen thug who was killed by a police officer in Ferguson after Brown
tried to take the officer's gun) is running for city council! But
Momma's comments will haunt her. She wrote on social media after two
police officers were shot, "If my FAM woulda got JUSTICE in August maybe
those two comps wouldn't have got shot LAST NIGHT..." Also,
"F--- THEM 2 COPS...DON'T GOT NO SYMPATHY FOR THEM OR THEY FAMILIES…Aint
no FUN when the Rabbit got the GUN."
That too is undisguised,
unreasonable, and uncontrolled hate and indicates a problem in public
education.
Maggie Gallagher cited a book that
expresses extreme hatred toward conservative Christians in America who
"tend to hold relatively high levels of social power." So Many Christians, So Few Lions: Is There
Christianophobia in the United States? was authored by George Yancey and David A. Williamson,
who asked people about conservative Christians. "'I want them
[conservative Christians] all to die in a fire,' said one man with a doctorate[.]
... 'The only good Christian is a dead Christian,' said another man with a
doctorate. 'I abhor them and I wish we could do away with them,'
said a woman with a master's degree. 'A tortuous death would be too
good for them,' said a college-educated man. 'They should be
eradicated without hesitation or remorse,' said an elderly woman with a
master's degree."
Hate is not defined by
education, race (and yes, of course blacks can be racists), religion, national
origin, politics, or financial status.
"Look at thus [sic]
chorus of entitled white men justifying a serial rapist's arrogated
entitlement. All of them deserve miserable deaths while feminists
laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their
corpses and feed them to swine? Yes." This was so
eloquently spoken by white Georgetown University professor Christine Fair. Chrisy is no longer teaching at Georgetown; she is "on
leave."
No sane person will
defend hate, but many haters use hate as a weapon and often go into battle with
Christian conservatives. Since the progressive cannot defend his
castle in ruins (liberalism), he fires the only bullet in his possession:
"You're a hater." That is supposed to settle the argument
in favor of progressives!
Pseudo-intellectuals like
Georgetown's Michael Eric Dyson said after George Zimmerman was acquitted in the killing of
Trayvon Martin that it would be a good thing for more white children to be
murdered so Americans could better understand racism. Mike is also a
Baptist preacher, but not a historical or biblical Baptist, for sure.
Sarah Jeong is a member
of the New York Times editorial board. She wrote: "Dumba--
f------ white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs
pissing on a fire hydrant." Also, "Are white people
predisposed to burn faster in the sun, thus logically only being fit to live
underground like groveling goblins[?]" Finally
Sarah's "White men are b-------";
"#CancelWhitePeople"; "oh man it's kind of sick how much joy I
get out of being cruel to old white men" and "f--- white women
lol."
Sarah is still with
the Times!
According to a report from Newsweek,
Trinity College professor Johnny Eric Williams is making waves
again. Breitbart News reported in June 2017 that Williams had argued that
first responders should have let Representative Steve Scalise die after he was
shot during a practice for the congressional baseball game. Williams
also shared a blog post by an anonymous author that asked black people to
withhold life-saving help from white people in need.
In a recent social media
post, Williams wrote that "whiteness is terrorism[]. ... If you see them
[whites] drowning. If you see them in a burning building. If
they are bleeding out in an emergency room. If the ground is
crumbling beneath them. If they are in a park and they turn their
weapons on each other: do nothing," the post read.
Of course, hatred is
hatred whether from the Left or right or in the middle; however, all the haters
quoted today have been from far out in left field.
Dr.
Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives who
ran a large Christian school in Indianapolis and wrote columns for USA
Today for 8 years. Boys authored 18 books, the most
recent being Muslim Invasion: The Fuse is Burning! EBook
is available here with the printed edition (and other
titles) at www.cstnews.com. Follow
him on Facebook at Don Boys,
Ph.D. and visit his blog. Send
request to DBoysphd@aol.com for a free subscription to
his articles, and click here to support his
work with a donation.
Class Conflict within the
Democratic Party
Over many decades, the
American Left, the Democratic Party and their mutual propaganda arm, the
self-styled “mainstream media,” have successfully portrayed conservatives and
the Republican Party as a coalition of the wealthy and intolerant.
Further, the Democrats and the left have claimed that they are the true
champions of the working or middle class as they unceasingly fight to defeat
and marginalize this evil menace.
The reality, however, is
that this cabal has virtually no interest in defending or aiding the working
class as they are, in fact, the party of a bifurcated constituency: the wealthy
and those dependent on the largess of the government.
Of the fifty wealthiest
congressional districts throughout the country, the Democrats now represent forty-one. Of the remaining
nine represented by Republicans, three are in Texas, the only red state on the
list of fifty districts. Not coincidentally the residents of these same fifty
districts are supposedly among the most well-educated and sophisticated.
This transformative process is not a recent phenomenon as the trend began
in the 1980’s and accelerated rapidly in the early 2000’s.
America’s elites, now
overwhelmingly represented by the Democratic Party, have a single overriding
interest: their self-indulgent lifestyle. This is manifested in
their mistaken belief that conservatives (i.e. the “right”) are hell bent on
enforcing their version of morality on the nation, thus potentially calling
into question the lifestyles of the rich and solipsistic.
The veracity of this
claim is immaterial as it would require an element of deliberation not emotion
-- a trait in extremely short supply among the nation’s privileged class,
nearly all of whom have difficulty in generating an original thought due to the
ill-education rampant in America’s universities. Thus, the mindless
accusations of racism, misogyny and Fascism directed at the conservative rubes
in middle America are acceptable, and in far too many instances believed,
particularly as many had the temerity to vote for Donald Trump – who, although
wealthy and Ivy League educated, is considered the ultimate unsophisticated
rube.
As conservatives are the
dominant force in the Republican Party and this nation cannot function
politically with more than two major political parties, the alternative is the
Democratic Party. An entity dominated by the American Left, an assemblage
whose core philosophy is antithetical to the interests of the wealthy and
privileged. Yet, determined to protect their lifestyles and vilify
conservatives, they willingly ally with the left and overwhelmingly support
virtually any Democratic candidate. In the recent 2018 mid-terms,
Democratic House candidates outspent their Republican opponents by a two to one
margin thanks primarily to this wealthy but myopic assemblage.
Their colleagues in the
Democratic Party, and the preponderance of the membership, are those dependent
on the largess of the federal and state governments. On the other hand,
the growing segment of the citizenry who are working and self-sufficient are
increasingly joining those who believe in limited government in migrating to
the Republican Party-- a process that is accelerating with the policies and
tactics of Donald Trump in combating the entrenched left and their
determination to culturally and economically transform the nation. The
Republican Party will inevitably become the party of the working or middle
class. As such, they could potentially dominate the political agenda for
the foreseeable future.
The left and the
Democratic Party, in order to offset this possibility, must aggressively seek
to increase the number of dependents by promoting the legalization and ultimate
citizenship for untold millions of illegal immigrants and promising all
Americans cradle to grave economic security. In order to enact this
strategy to defeat the Republicans, the left must have the active participation
and financial support of the nation’s wealthy-- which they have.
The Democratic Party has
evolved into essentially an incompatible two-tier class-driven entity
encompassing the nation’s wealthiest and the nation’s poorest. Nonetheless, it is at
present a convenient home for the elites to hold off the imaginary horde of
conservatives outside their gilded doors.
However, the voting
numbers within the party are overwhelmingly with those who generally support
the leftist philosophies of redistribution (e.g. socialized medicine and
guaranteed incomes) and curtailing of freedom (e.g. speech, assembly and
religion). While it may not manifest itself to the affluent who have cast
their lot with the Democrats, the redistribution of wealth must, by necessity,
come from the wealthy, as that is where the bulk of the nation’s wealth
resides. It is also this same small-in-numbers group that benefits
the most from freedom of speech and assembly.
Once fully embroiled in
this marriage of convenience, a divorce will be impossible as the co-inhabitant
of the Democratic Party, the dependent class, must continue grow in order to
electorally defeat the Republicans and protect the left’s agenda.
Further, the oversold expectations promulgated by the left will never be
satisfied regardless of how many promises are made or token redistributive
programs are enacted by the current ruling class. Only a complete
transformation of this nation into a failed socialist state will satiate the
left, their acolytes and their attendant army of dependency. A goal more
in reach than ever thanks to the inability of the nation’s elites to give a
damn about the future of the country.
There is not a more
short-sighted and self-absorbed group of citizens in this nation than the
white, wealthy well-educated urban and suburban voters. They are willing to
rend the fabric of this nation in order to protect their privilege and
lifestyle. While the vast majority of Americans will ultimately pay the
price, the current ruling class and their progeny will have far more to
lose.
Xavier Becerra
As Fox News pointed out in a
2003 interview on the Sean
Hannitty Show, Becerra has a devout relationship with MEChA, as well as The Fabian Society. But don’t go
looking for the clip; it is apparent Becerra’s people have been busy at work
cleaning up his inline reputation and record. KATY GRIMES
CHICANO MARXISTS PREPARE FOR BATTLE
WITH TRUMP ADMINISTRATION
https://sacramentocitizen.wordpress.com/2017/01/05/chicano-marxists-prepare-for-battle-with-trump-administration/
As Chicanas
and Chicanos of Aztlán, we are a nationalist movement of Indigenous Gente that
lay claim to the land that is ours by birthright. As a nationalist movement we
seek to free our people from the exploitation of an oppressive society that
occupies our land. Thus, the principle of nationalism serves to preserve the
cultural traditions of La Familia de La Raza and promotes our identity as a
Chicana/Chicano Gente.
By Katy Grimes and Megan Barth
CA Marxists Ramping Up Destabilization of the Golden State
Immediately following the November election, California Governor
Jerry Brown appointed U.S. Rep. Xavier Becerra (D) to replace State Attorney
General Kamala Harris, who won election to the U.S. Senate seat vacated by the
retiring Sen. Barbara Boxer.
Many wonder why Xavier Becerra was chosen by Brown. But all
anyone has to do is peek into the radical California Legislature, and
fanatical Gov. Jerry Brown, to see the trend of militant Marxist,
Socialist, Jesuit, Liberation Theology, Latino activism on the increase.
The goal by these extremists in California is to push
the state, and eventually the country to such a crisis, a reorganization
is the only cure. That is what Communists do. Modern day “Progressives” as they
like to be called, like Brown and Becerra, refer to themselves as
Multiculturalists and Progressives. But as history very clearly demonstrates,
using Marxism as the cure to anything in society is a very dark
fairytale.
The term “progressive” is simply
another way of saying “socialist” or “Marxist;” But it’s as important to
recognize how liberation theology factors into the radical Latino lawmakers: In
Latin America, the big enemy is not Marxism, it is capitalism. And the main
enemy of liberation theology, according to its founder, the Rev. Gustavo
Gutierrez of Peru, and many of its adherents, is the United States–Michael
Novak, the author of the 1984 ”Freedom With Justice: Catholic Social Thought
and Liberal Institutions.” Novak describes liberation theology as
“gaining its excitement from flirting with Marxist thought and speech.”
Xavier Becerra
As Fox News pointed out in a
2003 interview on the Sean
Hannitty Show, Becerra has a devout relationship with MEChA, as well as The Fabian Society. But don’t go
looking for the clip; it is apparent Becerra’s people have been busy at work
cleaning up his inline reputation and record.
“I got to be the first in my
family to go to college” thanks to MEChA, Becerra said.
Hannity repeatedly pressed
Becerra on why he would belong to a group that preaches racial discrimination,
prompting the Bustamente backer to complain, “Are you calling me a racist?”
When the Fox host pointed out
that MEChA favors the return of California to Mexico, Becerra still declined to
criticize the group, saying, “I got a lot of help from people in the
organization who have promoted education for kids and who continue to do that.
… What I know is what they do.”
MEChA is a Hispanic separatist organization (400 chapters
nationwide and in many high schools) that encourages anti-American activities,
civil disobedience, and romanticizes Mexican claims to the “lost Territories”
of California and the Southwestern United States, in a Chicano country called
“Aztlan.” The official national symbol of MEChA is an eagle holding a
machete-like weapon and a stick of dynamite.
The Fabian Society and Fabian
Socialism uses the teachings of John Maynard Keynes as their
catechism of political economy. Like Marxism, it embraced the idea of a
Communist Utopia, where the State owned everything and controlled every aspect
of the public’s lives. They have installed Fabian Socialism and Keynesism as the new faith,
both in the Universities and in Government bureaucracy. Keynes supported
statism and socialism, and managed and planning economies. U.S.
President Barack Obama has long advocated the use of Keynesian economic
concepts — despite the fact that John Maynard Keynes was incompetent, a fraud,
and accused of being a pedophile.
These groups have worked
diligently behind the scenes to implement their Socialist policies
into our government, labor unions and throughout academia. They have infected
the working class, demanding higher and higher wages, resulting often in
welfare and other government handouts once their employers are ruined.
They use illegal
immigrants as messengers of their ideology, demeaning patriotism,
and America. And they have manipulated the political process so that only
those candidates well-versed in Marxism receive the attention of the
corporate Media.
Illegal Immigration and Marxism
Even though the law doesn’t allow them to vote, illegal
immigrants are changing the landscape of the U.S. government, especially in
California, by impacting the census’ through mass migration. California
allows illegal aliens to vote.
Former Mechista Rep. Xavier Becerra, the U.S.
congressman for California’s 31st District, says what all leftist Latino
lawmakers say: their (illegal) constituents still pay taxes
and contribute to society, therefore
they should vote. — “An individual doesn’t have to be a citizen to pay taxes –
you pay taxes if you work in this country, you pay taxes if you purchase
something,” Becerra said.
Led by Los Angeles County Federation
of Labor head Maria Elena Durazo, a group of
socialist and Communist California labor officials and Democrat Party operatives
created a program to target Latinos and immigrants (illegal and legal) to
permanently drive California politics far to the left, Democrat political
consultant Richie Ross wrote in CalBuzz in
2010. Ross openly boasts of targeting the Latino community’s fear of
anti-illegal immigration measures, to drive the community even further into the
arms of the Democratic Party.
In 1994, then-Governor Pete Wilson
put Proposition 187 on the ballot. It was called the nation’s first
anti-immigrant initiative, but in fact the goal of Proposition 187 was to
make illegal aliens ineligible for public benefits including public social
services, public health care services, and public school education. It came in
the middle of a deep recession in California and was popular partly because the
fiscal estimate from the California Legislative
Analyst’s Office said that it would save
the state about $200 million/year.
Latinos and Communists
The two most significant Marxist
groups in the United States, the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of America, are both committed to increasing the Latino vote in order to
give Democrats a permanent electoral majority.
Maria Elena Durazo,Los Angeles County Federation of Labor head,
is closely associated with both groups. She is is also well connected
to former LA Mayor and Gubernatorial hopeful Antonia Villaraigosa, as well as
former California State Senator Gil Cedillo, both long time
immigration activists.
“Durazo, Villaraigosa and Cedillo,
all trained under legendary Los Angles Communist Party USA activist,
Democratic Party activist and “immigration reform” pioneer Bert Corona,”
Trevor Loudon wrote in 2013. All three have
long ties to both the Communist Party USA and Democratic Socialists of
America, and coincidentally were all prominent California supporters of
presidential candidate Barack Obama and long time ally of both the Communists and DSA.
(former mayor of Mexico’s second
largest city of Los Angeles) Villaraigosa has a long history with MEChA. As a
student, he headed the UCLA chapter of MEChA, but left UCLA six weeks before
graduation to become a full-time organizer with Corona’s Centro de Action Social Autonoma.
Another radical activist isRep. Luis
Gutierrez (D-IL), a co-sponsor of the 2010 Comprehensive Immigration Reform.
Gutierrez, a former member of the
Marxist-Leninist Puerto Rican Socialist Party, chairs the Immigration Task Force of the Congressional
Hispanic Caucus. Longtime amnesty activists Gutierrez and Rep. Xavier Becerra (D-CA), both members of the Congressional Progressive
Caucus, worked on the amnesty effort.
Communists seek to use amnestied illegals to build a “permanent
progressive majority.” Most thinking Americans know that Democrats only care
about illegals for the winning voting bloc they can provide, but most are
unaware that this idea was hatched and developed by the American Communist
Party, which Richie Ross clearly explains in his op ed:
The campaigns we developed
broke new ground, organized new union workers, and increased the political
impact Latino voters have had on California politics – simultaneously tripling
their number of registered voters, increasing the Democratic share of that vote
by 50%, and doubling the percentage of the total votes cast in California from
Latinos.
Through the rest of the 1990′s
our campaigns focused on legislative races in Los Angeles. We
succeeded. But it was all small.
In 2000, our message was
controversial (until it worked). “If you want to make a difference,
voting isn’t enough. Don’t bother voting unless you sign our pledge to
get 100% of your family to vote.” Latino turnout rose… and accounted for
14% of the votes cast according to the State’s voter registration and voting
history records.
The Enemies Within
Trevor Loudon’s 2013 book, Enemies Within: Communists, Socialists and Progressives in the
U.S. Congress, “profiles fourteen Senators and more than fifty
Representatives. Their ties to Communist Party USA, Democratic Socialists of
America, Workers World Party, the Institute for Policy Studies, Council for a
Livable World and other radical anti-American organizations.”
Loudon identifies Bert Corona, as the “Communist Father of the
‘Immigrants Rights’ movement” in 1960. In 1964, Corona, Cesar Chavez and future
Democratic Socialists of America member Dolores Huerta forced Congress to end
the guest worker “Bracero” program. Later, Corona sought ways to address
“problems confronting Mexicans in the United States who had no visas or
citizenship documents” – in other words, illegal aliens – including “how to
defend persons detained by immigration authorities and how to help immigrants
acquire disability and unemployment insurance and welfare.”
Loudon writes:
On March 11, 1998, Los Angeles Democratic
Socialists of America leader Steve Tarzynski wrote an email to another
Los Angeles DSA leader Harold Meyerson.
Tarzynski listed 25 people he
thought should be on an “A-list” of “25 or so leaders/activists/intellectuals
and/or “eminent persons” who would gather periodically to theorize/strategize
about how to rebuild a progressive movement in our metropolitan area that could
challenge for power.”
Tarzynski listed himself, Harold Meyerson, Karen Bass, Sylvia Castillo, Gary Phillips, Joe Hicks, Richard Rothstein, Steve Cancian, Larry Frank, Torie Osborn, Rudy Acuna, Aris Anagnos, Abby Arnold, Carl Boggs, Blase
Bonpane, Rick Brown, Stanley Sheinbaum, Alice Callahan, Jim Conn, Peter Dreier, Maria Elena Durazo, Miguel Contreras, Mike Davis, Bill Gallegos, Bob Gottlieb, Kent Wong, Russell Jacoby, Bong Hwan Kim, Paula Litt (and Barry Litt, with a question mark), Peter Olney, Derek Shearer, Clancy Sigal and Anthony Thigpenn.
Included in a suggested elected
officials sub-group were Mark Ridley-Thomas, Gloria Romero, Jackie Goldberg, Gil Cedillo, Tom Hayden, Antonio Villaraigosa, Paul Rosenstein and Congressmen Xavier Becerra, Henry Waxman and Maxine Waters.
In further preparation for battle, the California legislature
just hired former Attorney General, Eric Holder. “Having the former attorney
general of the United States brings us a lot of firepower in order to prepare
and safeguard the values of the people of California.” Kevin de Leon, the
Democratic leader of the Senate, said in an interview. “This means we are very,
very serious.”
Very serious, and very Marxist, indeed.
Part 2 of this series will be
published next we
No comments:
Post a Comment