Barack Obama’s plot for a third term for life
A Muslim dictatorship like his crony paymasters, the 9-11
invading Saudis who have financed him for decades.
“Obama has the totalitarian impulse.
After all, he went around saying he didn't have Constitutional authority to
legalize the illegals, and then he tried anyway. The courts stopped him.”
What was Obama’s motive? Simple, he knew if he did that
for Hillary, he’d own the next President of the United States, and could blackmail
her with the truth till the end of time. It literally would have given him a
3rd and 4th term.
THE OBAMA – CLINTON RUSSIAN CONNECTION
WITH THESE
TRAITORS, JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY!
How President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton aided
Russia’s quest for global nuclear dominance.
OBAMA’S WAR ON THE JEWS
Abunimah’s piece -- and Obama’s numerous
anti-Semitic associations -- got little attention. Throughout his life Barack
Obama has been close friends with numerous virulent anti-Semites: Jeremiah
Wright, Bill Ayers, Khalid al-Mansour, Rashid Khalidi and others. PAMELA GELLER
THE OBOMBS AND HARVARD
OBAMA AND HIS SAUDIS
PAYMASTERS… Did he serve them well?
Malia,
Michelle, Barack and the College Admissions Scandal https://globalistbarackobama.blogspot.com/2019/03/malia-michelle-barack-and-college.html
*
Michelle was the next to attend Harvard, in her case Harvard
Law School. “Told by counselors that her SAT scores and her grades weren’t good
enough for an Ivy League school,” writes Christopher Andersen in Barack and
Michelle, “Michelle applied to Princeton and Harvard anyway.”
GOOGLE WHAT THE OBOMB DID FOR HIS SAUDIS
PAYMASTERS
Barack Obama’s back door, however, was unique to him. Before
prosecutors send some of the dimmer Hollywood stars to the slammer for their
dimness, they might want to ask just how much influence a Saudi billionaire
peddled to get Obama into Harvard.
“Of course,
one of the main reasons the nation is now “divided, resentful and angry”
is because race-baiting, Islamist, class warrior Barack Hussein
Obama was president for eight long years." MATTHEW VADUM
Our efforts in showing what an insult it was to the American
people and to the victims of 9/11, and how many Muslims worldwide would inevitably
view it as a triumphal mosque built on the site of a jihad attack, defeated it.
The Ground Zero Mosque
Project Is Back
The
news was buried under two dense paragraphs and five large photos in an article in New York YIMBY
about a different project: "Construction has also yet to begin on 51 Park
Place, which is slated to become a 71-foot-tall, 16,000-square-foot Islamic
cultural center." The infamous Ground Zero Mosque project, a
long-buried effort to build a triumphal mosque at the site of the worst jihad
terror attack in American history, is back.
Construction
has yet to begin, but it will: the shady developer behind the Ground Zero
Mosque scheme, Sharif El-Gamal, has been working to build this sinister
structure for years.
We
defeated the Ground Zero Mosque project once before. The 16-story
mosque that El-Gamal initially planned to build there has not been
built. Our efforts in showing what an insult it was to the
American people and to the victims of 9/11, and how many Muslims worldwide
would inevitably view it as a triumphal mosque built on the site of a jihad
attack, defeated it. Tens of thousands of people came out for
our rallies in lower Manhattan against this celebration of this 9/11 attacks,
and El-Gamal was beaten in the court of public opinion.
It was a
long battle. President Obama announced his
support for the mosque at an Iftar dinner, no less. Then-mayor of New York
City and current presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg supported the
mosque as well, claiming hysterically that "if we don't build it, the
terrorists will win!" The media actively campaigned for it
— the elites in their increasingly fragile ivory towers relentlessly
stumped for the Cordoba mosque (euphemistically called an Islamic center with a
prayer space) for years.
And
yet despite all this opposition and much more, the people stood up and fought
the Ground Zero Mosque and won. An
army of Davids.
But
that wasn't the end of the story. Crains New York reported
on El-Gamal's new project in 2015 in a story that demonstrated how the
developer was hoping to sneak his triumphal mosque into existence: "Mr.
El-Gamal's Soho Properties has proposed a 667-foot condominium tower at lower
Manhattan's 45 Park Place. The glass skyscraper, which has yet to
break ground, will include at least 15 full-floor units of 3,200 to 3,700
square feet, and average prices higher than $3,000 a square foot, according to
plans released to Bloomberg by the developer."
That
sounded normal enough. But then the article added: "Adjacent
to the tower, Soho Properties will build a public plaza connected to a
three-story Islamic museum and prayer space." An Islamic
prayer space is a mosque. The article also said: "An Islamic
museum 'is just as much of an insult,' Pamela Geller, a blogger and one of the
center's most vocal opponents, wrote in an email. 'It will be like
having a museum touting the glories of the Japanese Empire at Pearl Harbor.'"
I
think an Islamic museum at Ground Zero dedicated to the half-billion victims of
jihadi wars, land appropriations, sharia, cultural annihilations, enslavements,
and sharia enforcement is an excellent idea, but is that what Sharif El-Gamal
had in mind? Of course not. And how did El-Gamal plan to
finance this? The answer was predictable. The New York Post reported
in May 2016 that "the developer of the failed Ground Zero Mosque has
nailed down 'Sharia-compliant financing' for a new, luxury condominium tower
and Islamic cultural museum on the same site, he and his banking partners said."
Then
in May 2017, the New York Times ran
a story entitled "Condo Tower to Rise Where Muslim Community Center Was
Proposed." The Times said that "45 Park Place, a 43-story
condominium that will soon rise three blocks from the World Trade Center,"
was "something of a consolation prize for the developer," as it
"replaces the developer's 2010 plan to build a 15-story Islamic mosque and
cultural center on this site, an idea that erupted into a national controversy
and cable news network bonanza."
In the
last couple of years, there has been virtually no news about this "Islamic
museum." But the New York YIMBY story shows that the project
has been advancing under cover of darkness. A 71-foot-tall structure
is three stories high, as in the revised plans announced in 2015.
El-Gamal
has many friends and allies among New York City's political and media
elites. It is likely that de Blasio city officials and the New York
Times and other city papers all met with El-Gamal and agreed to keep the
reporting on this project to an absolute minimum, so that it could get built
without incurring the righteous anger of the public again. The
first time around, they courted publicity and tried to make El-Gamal a
hero. We demolished that and destroyed their plans. So
now they've clearly decided to go ahead surreptitiously.
It is
disgusting that El-Gamal continues to taunt Americans and poke at America's
most egregious recent memory. El-Gamal was there when we had tens of
thousands in the streets opposing his Ground Zero mosque. He knows
how angry and upset people get at these Islamic structures on the site of jihad
war. The 9/11 Muslim terrorists extolled Allah no fewer than 90 times
in their last letters. Will those letters be on display at this
Islamic cultural center/museum?
There
is an important lesson to be learned here — and one we would be wise to
adopt. They never stop. No matter how absolutely they
lose, how many setbacks they suffer, they keep on pursuing their supremacist
goals.
The
Ground Zero Mosque project was and is a middle finger to the American
people. There has never been a mosque of reconciliation and healing
built on the site of a jihadi attack. Ever. It is, on the
other hand, an Islamic pattern to build triumphal mosques on the cherished
sites of conquered lands. History is riddled with triumphal mosques
built on the sites of jihad attacks or appropriated from other religions: the Dome of the Rock and
the al-Aqsa Mosque on the site of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem, the Hagia Sophia in
Istanbul, the Umayyad Mosque in
Damascus, and innumerable mosques built on the sites of Hindu temples that
were demolished by Muslims all attest to that.
And
now it looks as if Sharif El-Gamal is going to be able to build his own
triumphal mosque at Ground Zero after all.
Pamela
Geller is the president of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI),
publisher of The
Geller Report, and author of the bestselling book, FATWA: Hunted in America as well as The Post-American Presidency: The Obama
Administration's War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A
Practical Guide to the Resistance. Follow her on Twitter and Facebook.
“Of course,
one of the main reasons the nation is now “divided, resentful and angry”
is because race-baiting, Islamist, class warrior Barack Hussein
Obama was president for eight long years." MATTHEW VADUM
OBAMA’S AGENDA:
BUILD A MUSLIM-STILE DICTATORSHIP
The Case for
Impeaching Barack Obama
Listen to the Article!
Yes, you read the title of this missive
correctly.
As a career military officer, we
never believed that you win on defense. During the constant, incessant, and
insidious attacks on President Trump, I believe there should be a full-fledged
attack to evidence the abject, utter hypocrisy of the progressive socialist
left. If I were on any news program and was asked about the “impeachment
inquiry” of President Trump, I would pivot and discuss the case for impeaching
Barack Obama…and why the progressive socialist left defended his indefensible
actions.
If in this current frenzy by the
left and their media accomplices about Ukraine, the issue is about national
security, I can counter that.
Early in 2009, Barack Obama
traveled to Cairo, Egypt to deliver an address to the Muslim world. I have no issue
with his wanting to have an outreach. But we should all agree that Obama’s
requesting members of the Muslim Brotherhood to be in attendance, front and
center, was ill advised. All one need to do is understand the history of the
Muslim Brotherhood, the grandfather of modern-day Islamic jihadism.
This is the terrorist
organization responsible for the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar
Sadat. Anyone can read the Muslim Brotherhood’s website and realize what their
goals and objectives are, and they are not consistent with those of the United
States. Yet, Barack Obama supported the Muslim Brotherhood candidate for
President, Mohammed Morsi, as he undermined the office of Hosni Mubarak. Sure,
Mubarak was not the best, but he was not supportive of Islamic jihadism.
When Morsi won the election,
quite questionably, it was Barack Obama who congratulated him and offered US
support, to include military aid…to a Muslim Brotherhood backed president. The
people of Egypt were indignant, and in the end, revolted against Morsi and
overthrew him for a new President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi. Barack Obama condemned
Egypt and its so-called coup, threatening to cut off any US aid…which he was
willing to supply to a Muslim Brotherhood backed government.
Second point, Barack Obama
claimed that there was a major crisis in Libya and ended up outsourcing our
military support and aid to Islamic jihadist organizations against President
Muammar al-Gaddafi. There was evidence that Gaddafi was willing to negotiate
his removal and departure from Libya, but instead, Obama supplied weapons,
intelligence, and air support to Islamic terrorists who did overthrow, and
execute, Gaddafi. Since when did the United States provide military aid to
Islamic terrorists?
In the aftermath, the Obama administration
attempted a weapons buy back program from these same jihadists. And that led to
the debacle we came to know as Benghazi. Amazingly enough a US Ambassador,
Chris Stevens, was brutally murdered and paraded in the streets, along with
Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty during an Islamic terrorist attack.
But where was our support to those brave men who fought off the attacks? Why
was it that Barack Obama lied about this very sad day in US history, and was
never held accountable and responsible? This was not about some anti-Islam
video, which was the Obama talking point. And sadly, those four Americans who
lost their lives, Barack Obama did not even send a US military aircraft to
retrieve their remains.
Third point in the case for
impeaching Barack Hussein Obama, the off-mike comment by Obama to Russian
President Dmitry Medvedev. Yes, remember when Obama whispered, “tell Vladmir
that after my reelection I will have more flexibility”. It was 2012 and no one
dared ask of President Obama, that is from the left, what was meant by
flexibility? Here was a sitting US President making overt guarantees to Russia.
Funny thing, when Obama was in office Russia was not this enemy, dark specter,
matter of fact, the Obama administration offered a “reset button” to Russia.
Recall in the final presidential debate between Obama and Mitt Romney how Obama
chastised and ridiculed Romney on his assertion that Russia was our number one
geopolitical threat? Obama said to Romney that the 80s was calling for their
foreign policy back, now the progressive socialist left runs around screaming
Russia, Russia, Russia ad nauseum.
When Russia was overrunning
Ukraine, and Ukraine asked the Obama administration for support, Obama sent
socks and MREs. President Trump has sent A-10s and increased military support
to include increased military to military training and cooperation in the
Baltic States and Poland. And somehow, we are being told by Nancy Pelosi that
we must impeach President Trump for threatening national security and our
foreign policy?
Lastly, Iran is the number one
state sponsor of Islamic terrorism. Why then did Barack Obama sent pallets of
laundered cash in a blacked out unmarked plane to Iran? And no, it had nothing
to do with past weapons deals, those deals, agreements, had been made with the
Iranian Republic when the Shah of Iran was the leader. When the Shah was
deposed by the Ayatollah Khomeini, that agreement was null and void. Several US
Presidents, Republican and Democrat, had not sent cash to Iran, until Obama.
That was, and is, a violation of US Code, Statute, in aiding and abetting the
enemy, which Iran used the funds to advance its terrorist support, especially
to its proxy army, Hezbollah.
As well, why was it that Obama
did not bring the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the Iranian nuclear
agreement, before the US Senate as a treaty for ratification? Instead he made
it a unilateral executive decision, which is in violation of our US
Constitution. There was nothing said about impeaching Obama, but I am saying it
now.
I am tired of Republicans playing
right into the traps, games, of the progressive socialist left, instead of
putting them on defense. I would love to have someone, anyone, ask of Nancy
Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Jerrold Nadler, and Rashida Tlaib, who wants to use US
Marshals to remove Trump administration officials from office, to answer these
points I have presented.
The progressive socialist left is
mad that they lost the 2016 presidential election. They realize that, as Rep.
Al Green said, they will probably not be able to defeat President Trump at the
ballot box, unless they use tricks like ballot harvesting. So, what it their
only recourse, the Banana Republic, kangaroo court tactics of using impeachment
as a political weapon...this is nothing more than an unsophisticated coup.
The case for impeaching Barack
Obama was easy, yet the left and their propagandized media dismissed it. Let’s
stop allowing the progressive socialist left to dominate the narrative, it is
time to put them on defense.
(Allen West is a retired
Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Army. Mr. West is a Senior Fellow at
the Media Research Center, supporting its mission to expose and neutralize
liberal media bias. Mr. West also writes daily commentary on his personal
website theoldschoolpatriot.com)
Pollak:
Everything Joe Biden Said About Donald Trump’s Foreign Policy Actually
Describes Barack Obama’s
Johannes Eisele / AFP Getty
12 Jul 20193
3:48
Everything
former vice president Joe Biden said about President Donald Trump’s foreign
policy speech on Thursday actually applies to the policy that Biden carried out
together with former President Barack Obama — and not Trump.
In his speech, at City University of New York, Biden called
Trump an “extreme” threat to the country’s national security. No one has yet
taken Biden to task for describing the sitting commander-in-chief in such
alarmist terms.
But that wasn’t even the most bizarre aspect of Biden’s speech.
He said the main problem in Trump’s foreign policy was … Charlottesville,
Virginia. Biden went on to recite a version of the debunked “very fine people”
hoax, claiming that Trump had drawn a “moral equivalence between those who
promoted hate and those who opposed it.” That, he said, was a threat to
America’s mission of standing for democratic values in the world.
But in fact, Trump
specifically condemned the neo-Nazis
in Charlottesville on multiple occasions. The entire premise of Biden’s speech
was a lie.
Biden went on to claim that Trump’s foreign policy rejects
democratic values and favors the rise of authoritarianism worldwide. He cited
Trump’s warmth to Russian president Vladimir Putin and North Korean dictator
Kim Jong-un. And he claimed that Trump has undermined America’s alliances with
democracies in favor of flattery from dictators.
Apparently Biden forgot that Obama literally bowed to the Saudi
king; that he abandoned the pro-democracy protests during the Green Revolution
in Iran; that he pushed for a “reset” with Russia and abandoned our Czech and
Polish allies on missile defense; that he promised Putin he would be even more
“flexible” after he won re-election; that he tried to normalize relations with
the Cuban dictatorship without securing any democratic reforms there; that he
gave the store away to the communist dictatorship in China; and that he
abandoned Israel, a betrayal in which Biden himself played a direct and
shameful role, condemning Israel for building apartments in a Jewish
neighborhood of Jerusalem.
Trump praises dictators as a negotiating tactic; Obama praised
them because he, too, thought America was a problem.
One of the few times the Obama administration embraced
democratic change was during the Arab Spring, when “democracy” meant the rise
of the Muslim Brotherhood — which had no interest in freedom, only in power.
In 2008, the Obama campaign cast Biden as a foreign policy guru,
though he had been wrong on almost every foreign policy issue in his career. On
Thursday, he mostly ignored his own record.
Astonishingly, Biden claimed credit
for Trump’s success in crushing the so-called “Islamic State,” saying he worked
with Obama “to craft the military and diplomatic campaign that ultimately
defeated ISIS.” In fact, Biden was complicit in the rise of ISIS. He was
Obama’s point man on Iraq when the U.S. suddenly pulled out of the country,
leaving a vacuum that ISIS filled. He did not object when Obama called the
terror group “junior varsity.”
Biden offered nothing new in terms
of solutions to current foreign policy challenges. He claimed that the Iran
nuclear deal had been a success — on the very day Iran was reportedto have been
cheating all along. He said the U.S. should re-enter the deal once Iran did,
offering no idea how to ensure that it did so. On North Korea, Biden promised
he would “empower our negotiators,” whatever that means.
He said that he would get “tough”
with China, which Trump is already doing (and which Biden previously suggested he
would not do).
And on immigration, he ridiculed the very idea
of borders — literally: “I respect no borders.”
And this is the best Democrats have on
foreign policy.
Joel B.
Pollak is Senior Editor-at-Large at Breitbart News. He earned an A.B. in Social
Studies and Environmental Science and Public Policy from Harvard. He is a
winner of the 2018 Robert Novak Journalism Alumni Fellowship. He is also the
co-author of How
Trump Won: The Inside Story of a Revolution, which is available from
Regnery. Follow him on Twitter at @joelpollak.
OBAMA POSED WITH FARRAKHAN, ACCUSES REPUBLICANS OF "RACIAL NATIONALISM"
https://www.frontpagemag.com/point/271281/obama-posed-farrakhan-accuses-republicans-racial-daniel-greenfield
September 9,
2018
See if you can spot the
Republican racial nationalism in these pictures.
In his Trump-bashing
speech, Barack Hussein Obama accused Republicans of an "appeal to racial
nationalism that’s barely veiled". I don't see a whole lot of veils up
there.
ANTI-SEMITE LOUIS
FARRAKHAN SPOTTED IN THE FRONT ROW AT ARETHA FRANKLIN’S FUNERAL
Amber Athey | Media and Breaking
News Editor
Louis Farrakhan, the anti-Semitic
leader of the Nation of Islam, managed to snag a front-row seat at Aretha
Franklin’s funeral on Friday.
A live broadcast of the Queen of
Soul’s funeral shows Farrakhan seated in the same row with Rev. Al Sharpton,
Rev. Jesse Jackson and President Bill Clinton.
On
stage in front at Aretha Franklin’s funeral are Min. Louis Farrakhan, Rev. Al
Sharpton, Rev. Jesse Jackson, and former president Bill Clinton https://www.freep.com/story/entertainment/music/aretha-franklin/2018/08/31/aretha-franklin-funeral-live-stream/1151529002/ … #ArethaHomegoing
·
·
Farrakhan is a black nationalist
who has called for an end to white men and repeatedly gone on angry rants
against Jewish people. (RELATED: Seven Louis
Farrakhan Quotes On Jews, Gays, And White People)
“Some of you think that I’m just
somebody who’s got something out for the Jewish people. You’re stupid. Do you
think I would waste my time if I did not think it was important for you to know
Satan? My job is to pull the cover off of Satan so that he will never deceive
you and the people of the world again,” Farrakhan said in 2011.
In 2015, he asserted, “White
people deserve to die, and they know, so they think it’s us coming to do
it.” (RELATED: Louis Farrakhan Issues A
Sunday Call For An End To White Men)
BARACK Hussein OBAMA: THE CLOSET MUSLIM
PSYCHOPATH WHO HATED AMERICA!
"But the Obamas are the center of the most delusional cult of
personality that the media has yet spawned. And so we get bizarre
pieces like these."
The mullahs rolled in cash as a result of rolling
Obama and his gullible team over the deal, knowing that Obama was desperate for
some sort of legacy. MONICA SHOWALTER
MUSLIM DICTATORS, INCLUDING THE 9-11 INVADING SAUDIS,
FUNDED THE PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES OF BUSH, CLINTON and OBAMA!
ISLAMIST BARACK OBAMA
“Of
course, one of the main reasons the nation is now “divided, resentful and angry” is because
race-baiting, Islamist, class warrior Barack Hussein Obama was president
for eight long years." MATTHEW VADUM
"But the Obamas are the center of the most delusional
cult of personality that the media has yet spawned. And so we get bizarre
pieces like these." MONICA SHOWALTER
"Along with Obama, Pelosi and
Schumer are responsible for incalculable damage done to this country over the
eight years of that administration." PATRICIA McCARTHY
The Left Lines Up With the Terrorists
Britain's voters rejected soundly the Labor Party, whose former leader Jeremy Corbyn has called Hamas and Hezb'allah terrorists "his friends" and for whom Hamas expressed reciprocal support. Americans must similarly ostracize and marginalize politicians, organizations, and religious institutions that give tacit support to Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Hezb'allah, and other terrorist organizations.
There is a huge legal difference (no criminal liability versus up to 15 years in prison), but little moral difference, between giving material support to terrorists and seeking to damage Israel's economy through boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS). Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who endorsed Jeremy Corbyn, supports BDS, as do Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and 14 other House Democrats. So does Jewish Voice for Peace, which I call "Jews for Jihad."
The Presbyterian Church USA, Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, and American Friends Service Committee also deserve to be ostracized, shunned, and boycotted for supporting BDS and therefore (indirectly) Palestinian abuse of not only Jews, but also Arab Christians, women, and LGBT people. If you want to show proper respect for these organizations, as well as the United Nations, please donate to the One Israel Fund; I did.
Rewarding Terrorism
It is very easy to reward terrorism without providing material or even verbal support for terroristic violence. Ongoing support for a two-state solution assures the terrorists that there are no long-term consequences, such as permanent loss of their aspirations for independence or even autonomy, regardless of how many treaties they break, how many pizza parlors and Seders they bomb, how many little girls whose heads they bash in with rifle butts, how many Jewish families they cut up with knives, how many rockets they launch at Israel, and how many wildfires they start with incendiary balloons while they talk openly about destroying Israel. (Noting how wildfires release carbon dioxide while destroying carbon sinks, maybe Greta Thunberg should tell Hamas, "How dare you?") They have also, like the Nazis, spoken openly about how they want to exterminate all the Jews and rule the world.
Jews might be first on their list, but Sultan Erdoğan has made it clear that Christians and peaceful Muslims are next. "[T]he borders of Turkey span 'from Vienna to the shores of the Adriatic Sea.'" (How did that work out for the Turks in 1683?) The Palestinian children's show Tomorrow's Pioneers, meanwhile, talks about becoming "masters of the world" and "ruling of the world by an Islamic leadership." Didn't we hear rhetoric (in German) along those lines back in the 1930s?
Democratic frontrunner Elizabeth Warren has nonetheless expressed her willingness to pressure Israel to accept a two-state solution, and J Street also supports a two-state solution. While Bernie Sanders has condemned BDS and anti-Semitism, he also wants to re-legitimize the United Nations Human Rights Council despite its infestation by totalitarian nations like China, Egypt, and Cuba. Sanders also calls Israeli settlements illegal. The Democrat-controlled House voted to reward terrorism by continuing to support a two-state solution.
What Would Air Marshal Sir Arthur Harris Do?
The Israeli town of Sderot is so close to the terrorists that its residents have only fifteen seconds to reach a bomb shelter before terrorist rockets arrive. British civilians in London usually had, in contrast, adequate time to take shelter from Nazi bombs; cruise missiles; and, to a lesser degree, supersonic but radar-detectable ballistic missiles. The Royal Air Force's response was to turn Dresden and Hamburg into crematoria, and Winston Churchill apparently intended to drop a nuclear bomb on Berlin. The Nazis fired a total of 3,172 V2 rockets at all Allied targets during the war; the Palestinians have fired more than 20,000 rockets at Israel.
I can see no reason other than pressure from the United Nations, European Union, and pre-Trump United States as to why Israel has not similarly applied Admiral John Fisher's advice to every single rocket launcher, terrorist, and other military target in Gaza: "The essence of war is violence. Moderation in war is imbecility." The political and religious Left, on the other hand, continue to reassure the terrorists that they will suffer no meaningful consequences for exactly the same behavior that caused the United Kingdom to go dracarys on every German city within reach of the RAF.
President Trump Slashes Material Support for Terrorists
Thirty-four Democratic senators including Elizabeth Warren, and also Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), signed a letter opposing President Trump's decision to cut $200 million in aid to the Palestinians and another $300 million to UNRWA, which has been complicit in promoting violent hatred of Israel. The Palestinians' "pay to slay" program provides financial assistance to terrorists and their families. Money given to the Palestinians, and probably UNRWA, is therefore fungible with material support for terrorists. "Fungible" means that the Palestinian government can use the aid money to feed its people while diverting its own resources to buy weapons, pay terrorists, and indoctrinate Palestinian children to hate Jews and others, much as the Hitlerjugend indoctrinated German children, "products of the worst educational crime in the history of the world." (Yes, Dr. Seuss wrote "Your Job in Germany.") The Palestinian Hitlerjugend includes Tomorrow's Pioneers, "a cheaply-produced children's television program in which young children are brought onto a pastel-colored set and taught the wonders of killing the inhabitants of Israel." The show even says openly, "We will annihilate the Jews." I don't speak Arabic, but I did recognize "Yahud" in that sentence.
Norway has cut funding for violent indoctrination, but most Senate Democrats seem comfortable with giving the Palestinians U.S. taxpayer money regardless of its fungibility with hatred and violence.
Leftists Accuse Trump of Anti-Semitism for Fighting Anti-Semitism
The Simon Wiesenthal Center "Commends President Trump's Executive Order on Anti-Semitism," which will penalize on-campus anti-Semitism. Progressive Jews, however, denounce Trump's order as defining Jews as a separate nationality (it doesn't), while one critic complained that Trump's action is "an obvious attempt to kill the BDS 'Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions' movement on college campuses," as if that were somehow a Bad Thing. The Left has gone even farther by arguing that Trump's executive order somehow violates the First Amendment.
The First Amendment says only that BDS-supporters cannot be prosecuted criminally for, as an example, telling Jews to "go back to the ovens." It does not entitle these people, or organizations like Students for Justice in Palestine or many Muslim Student Associations, to financial support via publicly funded universities, or entry visas for the international students involved. If terrorist sympathizers want to advocate BDS and praise the Holocaust, they are free to do it without either taxpayer-funded university support or fear of criminal prosecution, just as racist white nationalists can call black people the N-word without fear of prosecution — and without taxpayer support.
Michigan Democrats are meanwhile about to elect a governor who supports BDS and a lieutenant governor who openly supports Hamas. "Hamas is a legitimately elected party that only rose to power b/c of Israeli aggression & Western complicity/enablement." The Palestinians therefore proved themselves as unfit to govern themselves as the Germans who legitimately elected the Nazis in 1932. The fact that Michigan voters, including those who elected Rashida Tlaib, are supporting this pair is another strong argument for Keeping America Great in 2020.
Civis Americanus is the pen name of an American Thinker contributor who remembers the lessons of history and wants to ensure that our country never needs to learn those lessons again the hard way.
President Trump Again Does the Right Thing for the Jewish People
I was honored to be present at the White House on the day President Trump signed an Executive Order protecting Jewish students from the harassment, bullying, and intimidation on American campuses coming primarily from Islamic student associations and leftwing professors and groups.
This harassment of Jewish students has been going on since the beginning of the Obama administration, and for all their supposed good intentions, the Obama presidency and the House under Nancy Pelosi never signed or passed an order or legislation to protect Jewish students on campus who are being uniquely targeted. Obama’s and Pelosi’s failure to stop this had resulted in an escalation and growing ferocity each succeeding academic year. I and some other Jewish leaders have spoken out and written about this calamity for years.
President Trump’s Executive Order does not attack free speech.
YouTube screen grab
Those who as a profession dislike Israel, and those who dislike Jews and use criticism of Israel to demonize Jews and Zionism remain free to spew forth their bias. What is now prohibited is the following: any speech that has as its goal the incendiary purpose of hostile and discriminatory actions against Jewish students. It is obvious that many of the Islamic and leftwing speakers on campus are fiercely prodding the audience to ostracize Jewish students from campus activities and clubs and to bully and physically and verbally intimidate Jewish students and invade their privacy by harassing them even in dormitories. The Islamic and leftwing groups scream and pound on locked doors where Jewish students congregate.
While the ACLU and other groups will go to court against the implementation of the Executive Order, there is no question that if a similar Executive Order were issued to protect black students or LGBTQIA students this would be heralded as a gesture against corrosive hate speech and a plea for tolerance and inclusivity.
There are some Never-Trumpers in the Jewish community who have condemned this Executive Order as anti-Semitic. These are the same people who condemned President Trump when moving our Embassy to Jerusalem as somehow anti-Israel. In their hatred for our President, they twist pro-Israel and pro-Jewish actions by Mr. Trump as anti-Jewish; yet they saw in former President Obama’s capitulation and giveaways to Iran something “pro-Israel”. Either their hate blinds them to common sense or their partisanship eases them into making lies for the sake of their political goals. No one should listen to them.
Groups such as J Street have come out against the Executive Order. It is obvious that J Street wishes the continuance on campus of unfettered anti-Israel pronouncements, calling Israel the worst names possible. Though criticism of Israel will certainly be allowed to continue, the Executive Order withholds federal funds when speakers advocate for the elimination of Israel or speak of it as an illegitimate state.
No one’s speech is outlawed; but federal funding will not be provided if speech is used to incite against and ostracize Jewish students or defame the very existence of the State of Israel. Federal funding should have long ago been halted to colleges whose deans and boards, in un-American fashion, continue to promote anti-Jewish campus Islamic groups and continue to hire leftwing professors known precisely for their work toward eliminating the Jewish State.
The Executive Order expands the definitions in Title VI of the Civil Rights Act to include discrimination based not only on race and color but also on ethnicity and nationality. By expanding these contours, aggressive Muslim and leftwing students will no longer be able to weasel out of their violence and guilt by claiming they are not against the Jewish religion. If they attack Jews for being Jews, they are attacking them as a people and members of a nationality. This, according to the President’s Order, is no longer tolerated on campuses wishing to receive federal funds.
Some leftwing Jewish detractors of the President hysterically condemned the President for expanding the definition of Jewishness beyond religion to include nationality. They are ignorant. Since it began, beyond being a religion, Jews were part of a people. They were called “The Jewish People.” The Bible, the Torah itself, refers to them as Am Yisrael, which means “the nation of Israel.” These same liberal Jews were against the recent legislation passed by the Knesset in Israel which labeled Israel a Jewish state and nation.
Our gratitude goes out to President Trump, who has been, without doubt, the greatest friend Israel and the Jewish people have ever had among our presidents and among world leaders. Those whose partisanship and hatred have blinded them should no longer be viewed as worthwhile or serious participants in our national conversation. Their toxicity should be contained to themselves. Let the nation be spared.
Rabbi Aryeh Spero is spokesman for the Conference of Jewish Affairs, president of Caucus For America, author of Push Back, and a frequent guest on Fox News.
No comments:
Post a Comment