December 17, 2019
What if Republicans make 2020 about impeaching Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler & Co.?
From sea to shining sea, the rallying cry of Republicans for the next year should be "287 in 2020." Why 287 in 2020? Because that is the number of republicans (or votes) needed in the House of Representatives to expel a member. And the best part is, it doesn't matter if they win their own election by 90% of the vote in their districts. They can still throw the gauntlet down and alert the people trying to unseat a duly elected president that it cuts both ways. Let them know that the aim is to remove them with the same constitutional power they are trying to levy against President Trump. If the people know that this is the intent of the next election, the motivation will draw the largest voter turnout ever. For those who get elected and refuse to follow through on expelling rogue members, have the recall ballots at the ready.
Let the howling begin over how unfair that is. Let the crying and rending of garments run for months over the supposed abuse of power they will claim. But there is no other way to announce, in no uncertain terms, that this lurid display of naked partisanship will not go unpunished. The Three Stooges of this impeachment process (Pelosi, Nadler, and Schiff) are so safe in their districts that voting them out at the ballot box is wishful thinking.
So let the threat be made. Put the cards on the table. Push the chips all in. Dare the Democrats to think we're bluffing. Will they wait to see the river card? Make it the next headline on CNN and the rest of the media enablers. And preach it with all the fire and brimstone of a Baptist sermon replete with the full choir singing it to the heavens.
Motivate the Republicans who didn't vote in 2018 to get off the sofa. They still have a voice in this travesty beyond re-electing President Trump. Give voice to the independents and blue-dog Democrats who see this sham for what it is. We the People can still influence this country as founded. Let the collective voices of sanity send a clear and unmistakable message: shape up, or we'll ship you out, regardless of how your little district enclave of lunatics thinks. It's peaceful, purposeful, and needed. Not only will it rid our government of un-useful idiots, but it will alert both parties that We the People still wield the ultimate power.
I can think of no one better to deliver this message than Representative Jim Jordan. I pray he, and all, be up to the task.
The writer lives in the dream that We the People still matter.
Image: Gage Skidmore via Flickr.
Donald
Trump Questions Nancy Pelosi’s Corruption
President
Donald Trump questioned House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s dubious participation in
stock market initial public offering shares, enriching her family.
Turns
out Biden's family not the only one to benefit from Ukrainian fossil fuels
Donald
Trump Questions Nancy Pelosi’s Corruption
AP
Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta
President
Donald Trump questioned House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s dubious participation in
stock market initial public offering shares, enriching her family.
The president shared a clip Monday
highlighting a CBS 60
Minutes report featuring author and Breitbart senior
contributor Peter Schweizer’s investigation into Pelosi and
her husband participating in at least eight different stock IPOs while in
Congress.
"The House gone rogue! I want to
remind you a little bit about the ring leader in this whole rogue operation
against the President of the United States..." @MarkLevinShow
60 Minutes reporter Steve Kroft confronted Pelosi on
the topic in 2011, but she
denied any impropriety.
The report noted that Pelosi and her
husband participated in an initial public offering of Visa in 2008, while
credit card regulation was underway in the House of Representatives. The
Pelosis bought 5,000 shares at the initial price of $44 and shares were trading
at $64 just two days later, according to the report.
“Congress has never done more for
consumers nor has the Congress passed more critical reforms of the credit card
industry than under the Speakership of Nancy Pelosi,” Pelosi spokesman, Drew
Hammill, said in
a statement, according to CNN after the 60 Minutes report aired.
The
clip was featured on Mark Levin’s Fox News show Life, Liberty and Levin on
Sunday.
Turns
out Biden's family not the only one to benefit from Ukrainian fossil fuels
On Sept. 24, 2019, Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced the official impeachment
inquiry that would be led by the Intelligence Committee and Rep.
Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). At first, this was a curious decision to
objective persons, since the Judiciary Committee has the authority over this
type of procedure. At the time, Pelosi indicated a threat by
President Donald Trump to our national security during the July 25 conversation
between him and President Zelensky of Ukraine. She did this without
the benefit of the transcript, but she doubtless already knew much of the CIA
"whistleblower's" complaint. Further, the Ukrainian president
disputes her version.
But this is not the rationale for her haste to convene the
investigation. It appears that the D.C. swamp benefits another
powerful family. The Biden family has gotten special treatment
from Ukrainian oil interests, and the Pelosi family has a similar
advantage. Paul Pelosi, Jr. was a board member of Viscoil and an
executive at its related company NRGLab, which was involved in energy business
in Ukraine. Perhaps the use of the Intelligence Committee has given
the Democrats the opportunity to limit Republican questioning and maintain
secrecy over the responses from subpoenaed witnesses. This would
prevent any official record implicating Pelosi's son. This also
explains her reluctance to take a vote authorizing the investigation, since the
minority party would gain some rights.
This is interesting also since much of the Democratic Party
rejects carbon-based energy sources. Biden has made this a part of
his campaign. The Green New Deal proposals will eventually end
dependency on oil and gas as an energy source. But this does not
stop these politicos from benefiting financially from this sector of the
economy. This reminds one of the financial benefits that Al Gore's
father had from Occidental Petroleum, which was one of the great polluters
(remember Love Canal?). He chose to make money selling carbon
offsets to atone and make his own name.
The Ukrainian oil company Burisma used
many well connected members of the D.C. establishment connected to the Obama
administration. This interlocking swamp is a threat to the
USA. But the media have managed to convince a vast number of
Americans that Trump is the threat. When Trump railed against Pelosi
in Louisiana on Friday, he was accusing her of not just splitting the nation
politically, but also ignoring the financial benefits to powerful families at
the detriment of our national security. This also helps explain the
constant discussion in public about Biden's son Hunter, in addition to the
political advantage he might gain.
No wonder the establishment (including many Republicans) wants to
impeach Trump. Family security always "trumps" national
security in the D.C. swamp.
NANCY PELOSI GOT RICH OFF ELECTED OFFICE AND SERVICING THE
“CHEAP” LABOR LOBBIES - Jim Gilchrist asked the question about Nancy Pelosi’s
ethics that should be on the minds of every law-abiding American – including
those immigrants who are following the law to become citizens here the proper
way: “Do we really need a House Speaker whose every action is calculated to
enhance her own financial interests, instead of focusing on how porous borders
will affect the security of everyday American citizens?”
SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI HIRES ILLEGALS AT HER NAPA WINERY
CALL LA RAZA NANCY TODAY! PUT THE HEAT ON HER!
EMAIL: NANCY PELOSI
CALL NANCY PELOSI Washington , DC - (202) 225-4965 San Francisco
, CA - (415) 556-4862
EMAIL NANCY PELOSI sf.nancy@mail.house.gov
Gilchrist was reacting to my report several weeks ago in
FrontPage Magazine that Pelosi – who owns non-union vineyards in Napa Valley
where grape-picking depends chiefly on the availability of cheap foreign labor
– is doing everything she can to help open the floodgates to more illegal
immigration. And she wants the American taxpayers to pay their way. As even more
proof of this
than I previously reported, Pelosi
does not want employers like her to be required to pay the cost of illegal
aliens’ hospital care. She voted against a bill that would make
employers liable for the reimbursements if an undocumented employee seeks
medical attention. And she voted in favor of rewarding illegal aliens from
Mexico with Social Security benefits.
Pelosi's Stake in Illegal
Immigration
________________________________________
The Minuteman Project, founded by Jim Gilchrist (who is also the
co-author of the book Minutemen: The Battle to Secure America’s Borders), is
made up of citizen volunteers who watch our border with Mexico and report
illegal entry to the border patrol. For performing that thankless task in full
compliance with the law, Gilchrist and his colleagues have been falsely
maligned as fascists, racists, and even murderers. They have been driven off
the speaker’s platform at Columbia University and vilified by Leftist
politicians and their handmaidens in the liberal press.
So it was no surprise that the mainstream media chose to ignore
a recent press release, issued by his publisher, in which Gilchrist asked the
question about Nancy Pelosi’s ethics that should be on the minds of every
law-abiding American – including those immigrants who are following the law to
become citizens here the proper way: “Do we really need a House Speaker whose
every action is calculated to enhance her own financial interests, instead of
focusing on how porous borders will affect the security of everyday American
citizens?”
Gilchrist did not stop there. He demanded an investigation into
Pelosi’s “economic stake in just the kind of illegal alien exploitation that we
deplore in Minutemen.” But you would never know it from the liberal media, who
- while ignoring this demand - have had no compunctions in calling for Speaker
Hastert’s head in the wake of the Foley page controversy.
Gilchrist was reacting to my report several weeks ago in
FrontPage Magazine that Pelosi – who owns non-union vineyards in Napa Valley
where grape-picking depends chiefly on the availability of cheap foreign labor
– is doing everything she can to help open the floodgates to more illegal
immigration. And she wants the American taxpayers to pay their way. As even
more proof of this than I previously reported, Pelosi does not want employers
like her to be required to pay the cost of illegal aliens’ hospital care. She
voted against a bill that would make employers liable for the reimbursements if
an undocumented employee seeks medical attention. And she voted in favor of
rewarding illegal aliens from Mexico with Social Security benefits.
At the same time, Pelosi has led the Democratic opposition to
any effective border controls or documentation requirements. She opposed the
Secure Fence Act of 2006, signed into law by President Bush, and voted against
final passage of a border security and enforcement bill in 2005 which required
that all businesses must use an electronic system to check if all new hires
have the legal right to work in this country. She voted against a bill to bar
drivers' licenses for illegal aliens in 2005. This year she opposed legislation
requiring presentation of a legitimate government-issued photo ID to prove
eligibility to vote, claiming that “there is little evidence anywhere in the
country of a significant problem with non-citizen voters.” She is dead wrong.
For example, an accused terrorist by the name of Nuradin Abdi was just recently
reported to have illegally registered to vote at the Ohio Bureau of Motor
Vehicles. Nuradin Abdi was indicted earlier this year as part of a conspiracy
to blow up the Columbus Mall.
How many other terrorist suspects may have slipped through the
system because Leftists like Pelosi oppose any meaningful screens? Instead she
continues to advocate our recognition of the flimsy, non-validated ID card that
the Mexican consulates provide to illegal aliens before they cross over our
border, called the “matricula consular”, which gives them phony documentation
to set up bank accounts, apply for jobs, obtain social benefits, board
airplanes, identify themselves to police, enter buildings that require IDs,
obtain drivers’ licenses and then perhaps use those drivers’ licenses to try to
illegally register to vote in our elections.
Pelosi also believes in giving sanctuary to illegal aliens. She
opposed legislation to deny federal homeland security funding to state and
local governments who refuse to share information they learn about an
individual's immigration status with Federal immigration authorities. Pelosi’s
hometown of San Francisco is one of the sanctuary cities she voted to protect
for the benefit of illegal aliens. Pelosi even voted against strengthening our
immigration law with regard to the deportability of alien terrorists.
Jim Gilchrist cut to the chase with this devastating observation
that the mainstream media does not want you to read:
"As we’ve shown again and again in ‘Minutemen,’ the
Democrats aren’t just hypocrites, but are working actively to subvert our
legislative system to their own ends. Their only goal is votes, votes and more
votes, no matter where they come from, no matter if they’re cast legally, no
matter whether the person casting them is dead, alive, a citizen or an illegal
alien."
Pelosi sees Jim Gilchrist’s Minutemen Project as a threat to her
pro-illegal alien agenda. More illegal aliens mean more votes for the Democrats
and more grape-pickers for Napa Valley vineyards like hers. So she even voted
against a measure that would have cut off the use of U.S. taxpayers’ funds to
tip off illegal aliens as to where the Minutemen citizen patrols may be
located! She obviously wants to see the Minutemen put out of business –
permanently. She can count on the liberal press to distort the work of the
Minutemen and to keep out of the public eye Gilchrist’s pointed questions about
her motivations for helping illegal aliens during the run-up to the mid-term
elections that may make her the next Speaker of the House.
Gilchrist, of course, is accustomed to being vilified and
prevented by the Left from getting his message out. In early October, he was
prevented from finishing his speech at the "Minutemen Forum"
sponsored by the Columbia College Republicans. Gilchrist had spoken for just a
few minutes and managed to utter the words “I love the First Amendment” when a
group of radical protestors took the stage and interrupted him, displaying a
big banner saying "There are no illegals." More protestors then
stormed the stage. Chaos erupted and the audience members who had come to hear
Gilchrist speak never got the chance, which was precisely the protestors’
objective. As reported online by the staff of Columbia’s undergraduate
newspaper, “a mosh pit of triumphal students and community members danced and
chanted outside, "Asian, Black, Brown and White, we smashed the Minutemen
tonight!" They also put out a statement declaring:
“The Minutemen are not a legitimate voice in the debate on
immigration. They are a racist, armed militia who have declared open hunting
season on immigrants, causing countless hate crimes and over 3000 deaths on the
border. Why should exploitative corporations have free passes between nations,
but individual people not? No human being is illegal.” (Emphasis added)
We have come to the point in this country where a bunch of
radical protestors get to decide who is and who is not a legitimate voice in
the debate on as critical a public policy issue as immigration. Such Leftists
think that migration in a borderless world is a basic human right. They want no
barriers, no guards, and no proof of lawful residency. They certainly do not
want the Minutemen watching the border and reporting illegal entry to the
authorities.
Leftist slogans like “no human being is illegal” are red
herrings. It is not the human being who is illegal; it is what the human being
does that may be illegal. One’s conduct is the test, not simply who one is.
Immigrants who follow our rules are welcome here. Those who do not abide by our
laws have no right to be here. A person who breaks into your house without your
permission does not deserve room, board and a job as a reward, even if the
intruder may be much poorer than you. He has broken the law and deserves to be
punished for what he has done. Our country’s boundaries and rules for entry and
residency similarly define who is permitted to be here and how we choose to
protect ourselves. We are a land of immigrants, but we are also a land of laws
with certain core values. Those seeking to enter our country and remain here
must learn to accommodate to our laws and values, not the other way around.
That is the way prior generations of immigrants did it, including those who
passed through Ellis Island. Why should the law be thrown aside now?
What we are witnessing is a frontal challenge to our nation’s
sovereignty. Mexico’s Foreign Secretary wants to drag us before the United
Nations for intending to build a fence on our side of the border with our money
to keep out aliens who seek to enter our country illegally. They will probably
get a sympathetic ear as some UN bureaucrats believe there should be no such
thing as “illegal” immigrants in the first place. For the first time in our
history, Americans are being asked to cede the right to decide how we define
ourselves as a nation and protect our own borders to a globalist governance
body. Will Pelosi lead her liberal loyalists as House Speaker to support the UN
against America’s right to control its own borders? Do we really want to risk
finding out?
It is high time, as Jim Gilchrist demanded in the press release
ignored by the mainstream media, that Pelosi come clean under oath as to her
personal stake in the illegal immigration issue before she can do even more
damage as House Speaker.
Pelosi - Illegals - Sunkist - Her investments!
Pelosi's corrupt insider
passing of bills that make her rich.
Check for yourself
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home House
District includes San Francisco.
Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San
Francisco, Pelosi's home district.
Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a
major contributor to Pelosi.
Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa
employing 75% of the Samoan workforce.
Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 million
dollars of Star-Kist stock.
In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was
increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the
increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make
Del Monte products less expensive than their competition's.
Last week when the huge bailout bill was passed,
Pelosi added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an
"economic development credit in American Samoa".
Pelosi has called the Bush Administration
"corrupt".
Check some more for yourself
Conservative Activist Jumps Pelosi's Fence With
Illegal Aliens to Prove a Vital Point
Conservative activist Laura Loomer, who is known for going undercover
with James O'Keefe, took alleged illegal aliens from Mexico and Guatemala to
Speaker Nancy Pelosi's home in California. There, the group jumped the fence
and Loomer demanded the group be let into the home. The group set up a pop up
tent with the word "morality" on it and hung the pictures of those
who were killed by illegal aliens, The Daily Caller reported.
No comments:
Post a Comment