"The newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador, was gleeful during the election when he told his compadres they should all move to America, illegally. His encouragement along with his pro-poverty policies will set the stage for another tsunami of illegal immigration." COLIN FLAHERTY
California’s de facto status as a one-party state lies at the heart of its poverty problem. With a permanent majority in the state senate and the assembly, a prolonged dominance in the executive branch, and a weak opposition, California Democrats have long been free to indulge blue-state ideology while paying little or no political price. The state’s poverty problem is unlikely to improve while policymakers remain unwilling to unleash the engines of economic prosperity that drove California to its golden years. Kerry Jackson
Do Democrats really care about election integrity?
What does "election integrity" actually mean to Democrats? A perspective is provided by the Democrat-sponsored "For the People Act" (H.R.1 in the current Congress), a dreadfully misnamed legislative mess that purports to improve election integrity and transparency. Some of its features are:
• Mandates automatic, universal voter registration, and makes it a crime to interfere with registration
• Allows voter registration at age 16
• Mandates early voting of at least 15 days and requires paper ballots
• Restricts and impedes routine voter roll maintenance
• Prescribes strict rules for redistricting and authorizes court takeover of redistricting
• Regulates digital political advertising outright, and restricts corporate political engagement
• Requires disclosure of donors by Super PACs and so-called "dark money" groups
• Requires presidential candidates and incumbents to release 10 years of tax returns
• Supports a Constitutional amendment to overturn the Citizens United decision
• Supports statehood for the District of Columbia
You can see where this goes -- a grandiose "big picture" reform program that mostly suppresses free speech, cements Leftist influence, and protects incumbents -- but does virtually nothing to address actual, on-the-ground election integrity.
In any plain understanding, "election integrity" demands two things: The trustworthiness of the voting process, and responsible voters. So, what exactly does genuine election integrity look like? And how can the election process help to ensure responsible voting? Here are some necessary characteristics:
Citizen-Only Voting. Allowing non-citizens to vote is, effectively, allowing foreign interference in our elections. Illegal aliens in particular have by their action disrespected our laws and evaded any formal obligation to the nation. The right to vote extends properly only to the nation's citizens, citizenship being a useful marker of allegiance and commitment.
Voter ID. Affirmative identification is necessary to guarantee that only citizens vote, and only once per election. Voter ID is often criticized as a barrier to voting designed to exclude certain segments of the population. But, let's be real -- no legitimate voter in society today is unable to get proper identification.
Advance Registration. Bluntly, if you can't get off your butt one time to go out to register in advance of elections, you plainly don't give a damn about participatory democracy and you simply cannot be counted as a responsible voter. Automatic voter registration and election-day registration are detrimental to both election integrity and responsible voting.
Election-Day-Only Voting. Same as above. Apart from a few legitimate reasons for absence on voting day, all of which are adequately covered by absentee ballots, you need to express your commitment to participative democracy by voting in person, on voting day. Early voting facilitates "ballot harvesting," bribery, and similar forms of vote fraud.
Election Roll Purging. Voter lists need to be pruned of citizens who have moved, died, were convicted, or failed to vote over a period of time. This is just basic, sound election-management practice. Failure to maintain the accuracy and currency of election rolls opens up vast opportunities for election fraud.
These are commonsense features of a well-designed election process that can go a long way toward minimizing election abuses while advancing responsible voting. But apart from paper ballots, you won't find Democrats supporting any of it. Instead, Democrats seek to thwart such controls, suppress political speech, and cite money and influence as the corruptors of our elections, while in other venues they advocate for non-citizen voting "rights" and other electoral vandalisms.
One purpose of H.R.1, and the ostensible goal of free-voting advocates, is to make it "easy" to vote. This is entirely wrong. The goal instead must be to ensure conscientious voting, and only by legitimate voters, period. Affirmative voter registration and in-person election-day voting are small but significant acts of citizenship that demonstrate a voter's civic commitment. Making it easy to vote conversely invites reckless voting, enables voter manipulation and facilitates fraud -- which plausibly are the true goals of unrestricted voting.
But what about electronic voting technologies, both for voter convenience and to help prevent election fraud? Do we really have to use "dark-ages" methods to achieve trustworthy elections?
Technology-enabled free-for-all voting can have outcomes such as Boaty McBoatface and similar absurdities. Beyond that, so long as even facial-recognition and fingerprint authentication technologies can be compromised, there is much to be said in favor of the assurances that physical voting processes, paper ballots (which H.R.1 surprisingly supports) and in-person voting can provide, despite their archaic nature. While you can generate thousands of bogus votes either way, electronic means of doing so are fast, low-cost, and can be difficult to trace and audit. Hardcopy voting records are tangible proof of election results and invaluable evidence in discovering and prosecuting election fraud. Though technology may improve over time, we cannot today afford the purported "efficiency" and "economy" of voting technology, in light of the risks and with so much at stake.
Accepting all that, shouldn't every citizen vote? H.R.1 requires universal voter registration. It is an almost mechanical assertion: Isn't 100% election participation a worthy objective?
Emphatically not.
Voting without civic engagement is a dereliction of civic duty. You can perhaps compel every citizen to vote, but you can hardly make them all vote responsibly. The proper thing for disinterested citizens to do is not vote, something that can be largely self-selecting -- and would be, if they were left alone. Let engaged, conscientious citizens, those whose diligence reflects their stake in the outcome, vote instead. Others should stay home.
Of course, all law-abiding citizens have the right to vote. But your fellow citizens have an equal right to expect that you will vote responsibly. Responsible voting begins with a genuine interest in the substance of governance; it means being properly informed of issues and candidates, including being skeptical of personality and unpersuaded by propaganda and emotion. It demands a knowledge of history and of the processes and institutions of government. In short, it means civic engagement. It means applying sober, informed judgment to electoral decisions.
Democrats of course reject such requirements or qualifications for voting, conveniently ignoring the essential connection of rights with responsibilities whenever it suits their purposes.
On-the-ground election interference has a long and ignoble history -- backroom ballot creation, voter intimidation, bribery facilitated by "walking-around money," with "vote early and often" a semi-facetious characterization of common corrupt practices. But modern tendencies toward relaxed voting requirements, wholesale elimination of vital election controls and, more recently, voting by illegal aliens, are now presented fully above-board, unapologetically proclaimed as proper and just. Today, any measure that has the effect of denying the vote to any individual is summarily dismissed as "discriminatory" and "racist" voter suppression. This is patently obnoxious. Unrestricted voting is arguably more corrupting than "big money" in our elections. Requiring citizens to vote on their own initiative is hardly nefarious; it is honest common sense.
Finally, while elections may be the expression of the people's will, voting alone is neither the sole nor the overriding determinant of our governance. The claim that "Hillary beat Trump" because of the popular vote total is as ignorant as it is meaningless, besides being boldfaced Leftist deceit. Such a solitary focus on "the will of the people" and elevation of the popular vote is seductive but misguided. The United States is constituted as a democratic republic, in which the brilliant inventions of the Senate and the Electoral College provide representation for the 50 sovereign states. (Remember them? They still matter.) Every vote counts, but only in the context of limited, representative government. In both lawmaking and the election of presidents, the popular vote is only one component of "what counts" for our self-governance. If consistency mattered to leftists, they ought to embrace the Electoral College inasmuch as it embodies our country's authentic "diversity." Instead, they call for its destruction.
The Founders trusted the people, but realized that effective self-governance needs engaged, informed citizens. Enabling and respecting the will of the people requires trustworthy, responsible voting. You have to wonder why the Democrats have a problem with that.
Democrats Vs. the People
California passes same-day voter registration, rigging elections
even bluer
Voting integrity group
finds millions of inactive registrations
"The newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador,
was gleeful during the election when he told his compadres they should all move to America, illegally. His encouragement
along with his pro-poverty policies will set the stage for another tsunami of
illegal immigration." COLIN FLAHERTY
FINISHING AMERICA OFF: THE
FOREIGN INVASION FOR “CHEAP” LABOR
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/09/the-fall-of-america-by-invitation-tens.html
Open the floodgates of our
welfare state to the uneducated, impoverished, and unskilled masses of the
world and in a generation or three America, as we know it, will be gone. JOHN
BINDER
But many
less-skilled migrants play their largest role by simply shifting small slices
of wealth from person to person, for example, by competing up rents in their
neighborhood or by competing down wages in their workplace. The crudest
examples can be seen in agriculture.
Overall, the
Washington-imposed economic policy of economic growth via immigration shifts
wealth from young people towards older people by flooding the
market with cheap
white-collar and blue-collar foreign labor.
The “mother of all caravans” is forming in Central America, and our
border-enforcement system is at “the breaking point” — all because Democrats in Congress
rejects any effort to plug the legal loopholes that drive the accelerating flood at the
border. In effect, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are doing just what Cesar
Chavez complained about 40 years ago: placating employers by allowing the
unhindered importation of cheap labor to undermine the efforts of American
workers to negotiate higher wages. MARK KRIKORIAN
THE
AMNESTY HOAX
But the business community will have little
reason to defend Trump, partly because they have gotten their double-shot of
tax cuts and cheap labor. In fact, the legislation does not sunset the amnesty,
meaning it can be quietly expanded with a few legal tweaks that can be attached
to any of the myriad obscure bills annually passed by Congress.
US now has more Spanish speakers
than Spain – only Mexico has more
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/29/us-second-biggest-spanish-speaking-country
THE INVASION!
MEXICO UNDER, OVER
AND OCCUPYING AMERICA AT STAGGERING COSTS
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2019/04/mexico-in-meltdown-narco-state-pouring.html
*
One in every eleven persons born in Mexico has gone to the U.S. The National Review reported that in 2014 $1.87 billion was spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds of billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/07/assault-on-american-worker-college-grad.html
According to Attorney General Xavier Becerra, once on Hillary
Clinton’s short list as a running mate, more than 10 million illegals reside in
California. When the illegals get driver’s licenses, the DMV automatically
registers them to vote. More than one million “new” voters were registered by
2018, but Padilla won’t say how many actually voted and refuses to comply with
federal probes of voter fraud.
Democrats Vs. the People
The conflict didn’t start
in 2016.
January 21, 2020
Lloyd Billingsley
After Russia collusion, quid
pro quo, “obstruction of Congress” and such, it’s clear that Democrats are
still trying to overturn the 2016 election. It’s hard to blame them, given the
great success of Donald Trump’s predecessor in the White House.
POTUS 44, formerly known as
Barry Soetoro, put time back on the clock for Cuba’s Communist regime and
helped Iranian mullahs with their cash flow, in exchange for exactly nothing.
On the domestic side, the president’s eponymous health plan took away the right
to choose. This prepared the way for his chosen successor, Hillary Clinton, to
implement “single payer” and complete the complete transformation prophesied in
2008.
Hillary lost, Trump won, and
Democrats still refuse to accept the voice of the people. Long before 2016,
this rejection of the people was on display in California.
In 1978, when Jerry Brown was
governor, soaring property taxes were literally driving people from their
homes. Embattled Californians responded with Proposition 13, the People’s
Initiative to Limit Property Taxation. This measure capped property tax rates
for residential and commercial properties at 1 percent of the assessed value
and prevented assessed value from growing more than 2 percent a year. The
initiative also required a two-thirds vote of the legislature to enact any
change in state taxes designed to increase revenues.
Proposition 13 mandated no
spending or state hires, but Brown called it a fraud and a rip-off. In June of
1978, a full 65 percent of California voters approved the measure, a landslide
victory. Governor Brown then proclaimed himself a born-again tax cutter but has
since spearheaded a tax counterrevolution, and Proposition 13 remains under relentless attack from
Democrats and their allies.
On November 4, 1986, California
voters passed Proposition 63, the Official Language of California Amendment.
This measure directs the state legislature to “preserve the role of English as
the state’s common language” and refrain from “passing laws which diminish or
ignore the role of English as the state’s common language.” A full 73 percent
of California voters approved the measure, a landslide by any definition, but
the people got no respect.
“In short, state legislators
and public officials acted as if Prop. 63 never existed, “wrote Orange County Register columnist Gordon Dillow in 2006. Some level of proficiency in English
is a requirement for American citizenship, in turn a requirement for voting.
Yet, in 2016, the California voter guide came in English, Spanish, Korean,
Chinese, Japanese, Tagalog, and Vietnamese. For 2018, Secretary of State Alex
Padilla, a Democrat, added Punjabi, Hmong, Syriac, Armenian, Persian, and Arabic.
The University of California
serves the top 12.5 percent of the graduating high-school class. Since the
seventies, the UC had been rejecting highly qualified applicants and reserving
spots for “minorities” not academically qualified. In 1996, Californians passed
the California Civil Rights Initiative, Proposition 209, ending racial,
ethnic, and gender preferences in state-college admissions, state employment,
and state contracting.
University of California boss
Janet Napolitano, a high-profile Democrat and former Arizona governor, derided the measure as a “legal barrier,” to “diversity.” Napolitano hailed a “partnership” with
Mexico and made the UC a sanctuary system, founding and funding the UC Center for Undocumented Student
Legal Services. The 4,000 or so illegals now
in the UC system pay in-state tuition and Napolitano granted them a $25.2 million aid package, with no compensation from the governments of the illegals’ home
countries.
In K-12, California had been
teaching Mexican students primarily in Spanish, which hurt their prospects in
higher education and the job market. In 1998, Californians passed Proposition 227, the English
Language in Public Schools statute, which ended so-called “bilingual
education.” Democrats have done everything in their power to block the measure
and reforms through ballot measures now face more obstacles.
According to Attorney General
Xavier Becerra, once on Hillary Clinton’s short list as a running mate, more
than 10 million illegals reside in California. When the illegals get driver’s
licenses, the DMV automatically registers them to vote. More than one million
“new” voters were registered by 2018, but Padilla won’t say how many actually
voted and refuses to comply with federal probes of voter fraud.
The Democrats give illegals
welfare, taxpayer-funded health care, in-state tuition and protect them from deportation
through sanctuary laws. In return, the illegals vote for Democrats and the
ballot measures the want. The illegals function as the Democrats imported
electoral college, canceling the vote of legitimate citizens and legal
immigrants, blocking reform and keeping Democrats in power. Maybe that is what
Michael Bloomberg had in mind when he called California “a great example for the rest of this country.”
Meanwhile, in 2020, Democrats
don’t want the people to select the president. They want their party to remove
the president from office, and some never-Trump Republicans will doubtless go
along. As President Trump says, we’ll have to see what happens but one thing
remains clear.
Under any Democrat running for
office, particularly Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, you wouldn’t get what
you want. You would get only what the government wants you to have. That was
the plan of POTUS 44’s chosen successor, and that’s why Democrats have never
accepted the voice of the people in 2016.
California passes same-day voter registration, rigging elections
even bluer
As if ballot-harvesting by illegal
aliens were not enough, California has come up with a new way to rig
elections to ensure one-party permanent Democratic Party rule.
According to the Los
Angeles Times:
SACRAMENTO — Californians
will be able to register to vote on election day at local polling places and
voting centers under legislation signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom on Tuesday, a
potentially significant step toward boosting turnout in key contests next year.
The
new law provides for a significant expansion of so-called conditional voter
registration, which allows a new voter to cast a ballot that is counted after
eligibility is determined during the 30-day vote-counting period after an
election. That process began in last year's statewide election, but
registration was available only in county elections offices. Starting next
year, voters can register on election day anywhere ballots are cast.
"This
simply enfranchises more people to vote," said state Sen. Tom Umberg
(D-Santa Ana), the author of the new law. "The presidential race is one
thing, but this is going to make an even bigger difference in turnout for local
races."
California's Gov. Gavin Newsom, who's
been curiously silent on his Facebook page about the gargantuan blackouts
slamming the Bay Area, proudly has this news right there at the top of his page
as his signature achievement.
Suffice to say, this is a recipe for
disaster. As voting tallies roll out in real time on election day,
Democratic operatives, illegally here or not, will be right onto the matter,
with lists of unregistered potential voters, going to their homes and signing
them up to make the tally go their way. The political muscle used is
going to be amazing.
With California already not checking
who's legally allowed to vote, and often, through the Department of Motor
Vehicles' automatic voter registration system, you can bet that a lot of those
newly registered voters are not going to be here legally. The
sanctuary state, after all, does not check.
Now that they've got a
register-or-else system of political muscling for registrations in elections
going the Republican way, you can bet they will muscle illegals to register —
with a warning that they'll be reported to authorities as illegal if they
don't.
They'll be additionally shielded from
scrutiny based on the fact that the state has refused to cooperate
with federal investigators about who's registered legally, so it's a perfect
game for them.
What's stunning is why they did it at
all. After all, haven't they already gotten the solid blue state
they've wanted, based on their past rigging? They've even gotten
deep red Orange County in their column, which has a whiff of
fraud. They've enacted driver's licenses for illegal aliens and now
automatic motor voter registration, which can be halted only on the honor
system, if someone says he is not allowed to vote due to being a
non-citizen. Plenty of "errors" have already happened.
They've also enacted automatic
mail-in ballots, even if people do not ask for them, putting physical paper
ballots on every kitchen table in the state if not in the mailboxes of people
who have moved away. Based on that, they've enacted
ballot-harvesting, where Democratic operatives break the chain of custody in
first counting votes coming in and, once they see a result they don't like,
fanning out and going to people's houses who still have not voted — and
"collecting" those votes, once they've "helped" these
indifferent or unwilling voters to fill them out. You can see how
easy it would be to coerce an illegal alien in such
conditions. Worse still, the fate of the ballot of someone who
voted the "wrong" way is anyone's guess. No one knows if
they turn all the ballots in.
Rest assured: there's more
rigging. They've enacted a first-two-out-the-gate primary system,
which keeps Republicans off the ballot entirely, forcing voters to choose
between just two Democrats, one hideous and the second even worse. That
was the nightmare Republicans faced when they were forced to choose between
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, who'd just got caught employing a Chinese spy for 20
years, and a crazed leftist affiliated with what's unaffectionately known as
the "Mexican mafia" of California's political machinery, named Kevin
de León. The map here shows
how bad it is.
With this kind of rigging, it's no
wonder California, which still has a sizable conservative contingent, has
nearly zero representation in any public office, state or national.
Yet the :eft still can't trust the
good thing it's got and still doesn't trust those unreliable
voters. This measure to stack the total with same-day registrations
is just the latest scheme to ensure permanent power. It stinks to
high heaven.
Democrats turning California into a third-world hellhole: Going
without electricity edition
Democrats are turning California into
a third-world hellhole without electricity, water, and freedom.
Due to Democrats' love for trees, at
least 800,000 Californians will be without power for
several days. Instead of properly managing California forests to
reduce the chances of big fires, Democrats are saying Californians have to go
without lights, refrigerators, and air-conditioning. Democrats could
also avoid this by not making the power company financially liable for all
forest fire damages, but since PG&E is a company, not an illegal alien, the
Democrats couldn't care less about doing what's best for California.
While they try to blame climate
change and the infrastructure, the reality is that neither of those has caused
any significant changes in the last ten years — but now, suddenly, due to
Democrat policies, Californians have to start living in the 18th century.
The Democrats who run California also
refuse to build more water storage capacity even though the state's population
has dramatically increased, ensuring that water has to be rationed during
droughts.
Democrats are turning
California into a third-world country economically. The income
inequality between the über-rich Silicon Valley workers and the rest of Californians
is huge, just like in third-world countries, while the elites live in luxury
and the rest live in squalor.
Democrats are doing a great job
manufacturing poverty and homelessness even as they fail to instill hope in
Californians.
California has four times more
homeless per capita and three times more poor per capita than the rest of
America. Half the homeless in America are in California, even though
California has only 12% of the U.S. population. Also, blacks are six
times more prevalent in
the San Francisco homeless population than they are in California in general.
The homeless explosion has brought
the return of third-world diseases like typhus to California — not to mention
streets littered with human feces.
Democrats are trying to
keep people from having cars, just like the people of the Third World. After
all, a car gives people the freedom to move, and freedom is a bad thing in the
minds of Democrats since it limits the power the government has over citizens.
Recently, Gavin Newsom, the Democrat
governor, transferred millions of dollars that the voters had been ensured
would go to improve the state's failing road infrastructure to a fund designed
to convince Californians to give up their cars.
Democrats are also working to make
cars unaffordable for any but the richest Californians.
Californians pay $1.53 more for a gallon for gasoline than the rest
of America. That's $21 more for a tank of
gasoline. Facebook employees won't notice it, but the poor in
California who can't afford to live near their jobs are paying through the
teeth.
Like all third-world tyrants,
Democrats are doing everything they can to eliminate democracy in California.
The jungle primary, where the top two
candidates in the primaries go against each other, has resulted in many races
where two Democrats are running against each other, giving voters who don't
agree with the Democrats' failed policies no one to vote for.
California is doing
nothing to ensure that people who shouldn't vote don't
vote. Instead, the people running the state are doing everything
possible to let illegal aliens vote. When illegal aliens go pick up
their driver's licenses, they're automatically enrolled to vote unless they say
they're not citizens.
California is also trying to end
democracy by keeping the Republican presidential candidate off the
ballot. Democrats passed an unconstitutional law to keep any
candidate who didn't release his tax returns off the ballot solely to keep
Californians from voting for Trump.
Finally, the Democrats are going
after freedom of the press. An undercover journalist revealed that
Planned Parenthood was selling aborted baby parts. Instead of
investigating that illegal practice, Democrat Kamala Harris decided to put the
journalist on trial.
Democrats keep telling us California
is the future if they get elected. That means that poverty,
homelessness, the end of democracy, and a press that reports only what
Democrats want heard are what Democrats are promising us.
If you're an immensely wealthy Google
employee, California is Heaven. If you're not, it's becoming more
and more like Hell.
You can read more of
Tom's rants at his blog, Conversations
about the obvious, and feel free
to follow him on Twitter.
Hans von Spakovsky: DOJ Should Sue States Registering Non-Citizens to Vote
Hans von Spakovsky,
manager of the Heritage Foundation’s Election Law Reform Initiative and a
senior legal fellow of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, said
Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband should sue states illegally
registering non-citizens to vote. He offered his remarks in an interview on
Friday’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News
Tonight with host Rebecca Mansour and special
guest host Rick Manning.
Left-wing and Democrat advocacy for abolition of the electoral
college is part of a broader plan that includes registration of non-citizens —
including illegal aliens — to vote, explained von Spakovsky.
Mansour noted New York Democrats’
plan to automatically register to vote all
residents applying for driver’s licenses — which including non-citizens and
illegal aliens — unless they “opt-out.”
“This is part and parcel of that whole system-wide movement to
make sure that people who are not citizens are registering [to vote] and not
getting caught or prosecuted for it, and [then] switching [presidential
elections] a national popular vote system so that all those votes will help win
elections.”
LISTEN:
Von Spakovsky added, “Every single U.S. attorney around the
country ought to be investigating and prosecuting … aliens who are
registering and voting. They’re doing it all over the country. So far, only two
U.S. attorneys — one in North Carolina [and] one in Texas — have brought any
kind of cases like that. [U.S. attorneys in] the rest of the states … are
ignoring these cases and not doing anything about it.”
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can help improve the
accuracy of states’ voter rolls, explained von Spakosvky, by cross-referencing
state databases with its own records.
“[DHS} ought to be going through its records and trying to
compare its database with state voter registration lists across the country to
help the states find, again, non-citizens who are illegally registered to vote.
And that’s not really happening, either, that I’m aware of.”
Von Spakosvky advised, “What [Eric Dreiband] can do is use the
Motor Voter law — that National Voter Registration Act — to sue states that
aren’t properly cleaning up their voter rolls and maintaining the accuracy of
their voter rolls those cases they ought to be filing them because there are
plenty of states that aren’t doing what they’re supposed to be doing under the
law.”
Breitbart News Tonight broadcasts live on SiriusXM Patriot
channel 125 weeknights from 9:00 p.m. to midnight Eastern or 6:00 p.m. to 9:00
p.m. Pacific.
Voting integrity group
finds millions of inactive registrations
One of the standard jokes about Chicago
politics is that a lot of people who voted Republican during their lives start
voting Democrat after their deaths. Contrary to Democrats’ obsession with voter
suppression, the truth is that voter
fraud is real and it is, or should be,
a serious concern. Thanks to Judicial Watch, we’re learning that
currently there
are at least 2.5 million inactive registrations up for grabs around America:
Judicial
Watch announced today it is continuing its efforts to force states and counties
across the nation to comply with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), by sending notice-of-violation
letters to 19 large counties in
five states that it intends to sue unless the jurisdictions take steps to
comply with the law and remove ineligible voter registrations within 90 days.
Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act requires jurisdictions to take
reasonable efforts to remove ineligible registrations from its rolls.
Despite
successful litigation by Judicial Watch to bring counties and states into
compliance with the National Voter Registration Act, voter registration lists
across the country remain significantly out of date. According to Judicial
Watch’s analysis of data released by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission
(EAC) this year, there are 378 counties nationwide that have more voter
registrations than citizens living there and old enough to vote, i.e., counties
where registration rates exceed 100%. These 378 counties combined had about 2.5
million registrations over the 100%-registered mark, which is a drop of about
one million from Judicial Watch’s previous
analysis of voter registration
data. Although San Diego County removed 500,000 inactive names from voter rolls
following Judicial Watch’s settlement with Los Angeles County, San Diego still
has a registration rate of 117% and has one of the highest registration rates
in the country.
These inactive voters are not just extra
paper cluttering up files in various county offices. Instead, explained Tom
Fitton, Judicial Watch’s president, they expose American elections to the
risks of significant corruption:
“Dirty voting
rolls can mean dirty elections and Judicial Watch will insist, in court if
necessary, that states follow federal law to clean up their voting rolls,” said
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Previous Judicial Watch lawsuits have
already led to major cleanups in California, Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio – but
more needs to be done. It is common sense that voters who die or move away be
removed from the voting rolls.”
Fitton’s concerns take on special
resonance when one considers that California counties are among the worst
culprits. This is especially true in Central and Southern California, both
regions with high populations of illegal immigrants and legal green
cardholders. After all, as Hillary and her supporters never stop reminding us,
she may have lost the Electoral College, but she won the popular vote. And
while voter
fraud is bipartisan, it’s still interesting to
note that, per a post-election analysis, Hillary’s meaningless popular vote
victory came from . . . California:
As we noted
in this space earlier, while
Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's
huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3
million more votes than Trump.
California is
the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than
President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.
[snip]
If you take
California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump wins the rest of the
country by 1.4 million votes. And if California voted like every other
Democratic state — where Clinton averaged 53.5% wins — Clinton and Trump end up
in a virtual popular vote tie.
Because California is a one-party state,
it’s possible that all of Hillary’s votes were legitimate. And it’s also
possible that, with a lot of deadwood in the country registrars’ offices, they
were not. Ultimately, everyone benefits when county registrars follow the law
and maintain accurate, up-to-date records.
“Furthermore,
the much-quoted estimate of 11 million undocumented aliens in the U.S. may be
woefully short of the truth. A new study by Yale University suggests the true
number of illegals is probably in the 20-to-30 million range, more than enough
to kill the two-party system at one stroke, if they eventually receive the
citizenship amnesty promised by Democrats.” JAMES DELMONT…. AMNESTY WILL ENABLE 40 MILLION ILLEGALS TO BRING UP THE REST OF
THEIR FAMILIES. NOW DO THE MATH ON THE LOOMING JOBS, HOUSING AND SOCIAL
SECURITY CRISIS.
"The newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador,
was gleeful during the election when he told his compadres they should all move to America, illegally. His encouragement
along with his pro-poverty policies will set the stage for another tsunami of
illegal immigration." COLIN FLAHERTY
California’s de facto
status as a one-party state lies at the heart of its poverty problem. With a permanent majority in the
state senate and the assembly, a prolonged dominance in the executive branch,
and a weak opposition, California Democrats have long been free to indulge
blue-state ideology while paying little or no political price. The state’s
poverty problem is unlikely to improve while policymakers remain unwilling to
unleash the engines of economic prosperity that drove California to its golden
years. Kerry Jackson
Is the government of
Mexico behind this? You have seen quotes from a Mexican President and a Mexican
Consul General in support of it. They have everything to gain and little to
lose by pushing it. The Mexican government is also pushing illegal immigration,
which destabilizes our economy. TOM BARRETT
One in every eleven persons born in Mexico has gone to the U.S. The National Review reported
that in 2014 $1.87
billion was spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add
hundreds of billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr
Is Mass Immigration Killing Two-Party Democracy
in the U.S.? BUT ISN'T THAT THE POINT OF DEMOCRAT PARTY SABOTAGE OF VOTING FOR LEGALS ONLY???
It used to be that
legal immigrants would divide their votes once they became citizens. But that
was then.
Few seem
willing to admit it, but mass immigration appears to be killing democracy in
the United States. Two-party democracy
withstood the unprecedented mass immigration of the 1870-to-1914 period because
the European immigrants tended, for one reason or another, to vote for both
parties. That is not true today. In the 19th century, newcomers voted along
religious lines to a remarkable degree: Irish Catholics 80 percent Democrat and
all Catholics 70 percent Democrat. But after the Civil War, Germans and
Scandinavians, heavily Lutheran, voted Republican, as English Canadian and
British immigrants did. In the famous turning-point presidential election of
1896, urban working-class immigrants tended to vote Republican, organized by
the active and powerful political machines in big cities like New York,
Philadelphia, and Chicago. Very few in the mass migration of that day moved to
the American South, which remained solidly Democrat. The two-party system
survived throughout most of the country as both parties had urban political
machines that provided social services to immigrants.
The present
massive wave of immigration that began in the 1970s, largely as a result of the
extended family clause in the 1965 Kennedy immigration reform bill, has had
remarkably different results. The new immigrants are voting overwhelmingly
Democrat: Hispanics 2 to 1, Asians about 70 percent (all election figures from
the Pew Research
Center). The children of Asian immigrants
voted 82 percent for Barack Obama in 2008. In addition, black Americans who
used to vote Republican now vote 90 percent or more Democrat, as do black
immigrants.
California
not long ago was a state Republicans could win. Two presidents, Richard Nixon
and Ronald Reagan, came from California and major offices such as governor were
regularly won by Republicans. Today California is a permanently blue state,
with its wealth of electoral votes. Its U.S. senators, governor, and most of
its members of Congress are Democrats. Democrats have a supermajority in both
houses of the Legislature and have changed the constitution so that party
primaries have been banned in favor of “open” primaries in which Republicans
are likely not to finish higher than third, thus not making the November
ballot. In the last two U.S. Senate races, 2016 and 2018, voters were offered
Democrat No. 1 and Democrat No. 2 as choices. Unsurprisingly, Democrats won
both elections, and one of the winners, Kamala
Harris, is now running for president.
The
demographic tidal wave of mostly Third World immigrants who vote heavily
Democrat is now running legally at a million a year, an all-time record, and is
turning red states purple and then blue. Arizona
is going, Colorado and Georgia are going, Virginia is gone, North Carolina is
tipping, and Florida is a dead heat but the immigration trends
(south-of-the-border Latinos and Puerto Ricans) are against the GOP. Even Texas
is drifting leftward as Latinos bid to become a solid majority there. There is
the myth, of course — offered by members of the Bush family — that Hispanics
will see the light and begin voting like Indiana Republicans. In
fact, Hispanics have voted Democrat since 1960, and they went for Obama in
2008 by 67-31 percent and for Hillary Clinton in 2016 by 66-28 percent. So much
for the Bush theory. Asians voted 77 percent for Obama in 2012 and 79 percent
for Clinton in 2016. So much for the two-party system.
Furthermore,
the much-quoted estimate of 11 million undocumented aliens in the U.S. may be
woefully short of the truth. A new study by Yale University suggests the true
number of illegals is probably in the 20-to-30 million range, more than enough
to kill the two-party system at one stroke, if they eventually receive the
citizenship amnesty promised by Democrats.
The
two-party system in the U.S. has been healthy since 1796, when Thomas Jefferson
took on John Adams in the presidential contest. They met again in 1800 in a
more famous showdown, by which time the earliest political parties had formed
and taken on ideological hues that still exist today. The ideal situation for a
healthy democracy and a workable two-party system is a stable population. If
the population is stable (and growing slowly), each party has an opportunity to
persuade the public of its merits. That opportunity is disappearing quickly
because the population is not stable. We are not far from the time when the
U.S. will have a Latino majority and will, regrettably, be a one-party state.
Apparently, that is what Democrats want.
James Delmont, author of The
Great Liberal Death Wish, has been
published in Financial Times, USA Today, the Baltimore Sun,
the Weekly Standard, the Saturday Evening Post, the Daily
Caller, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, the Omaha World-Herald, and
other publications. He has taught at the University of Nebraska-Omaha, the
University of Minnesota, and other institutions.
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
What will America stand for in 2050?
The US should think long and hard about the high number of
Latino immigrants.
By Lawrence Harrison
It's not just a
short-run issue of immigrants competing with citizens for jobs as unemployment
approaches 10 percent or the number of uninsured straining the quality of
healthcare. Heavy immigration from Latin America threatens our cohesiveness as
a nation.
MEXICO WILL DOUBLE U.S.
POPULATION
By Tom Barrett
At the current rate of invasion (mostly through Mexico, but also
through Canada) the United States will be completely over run with illegal
aliens by the year 2025. I’m not talking about legal immigrants who follow US
law to become citizens. In less than 20 years, if we do not stop the invasion,
ILLEGAL aliens and their offspring will be the dominant population in the
United States.
FINISHING AMERICA OFF: THE
FOREIGN INVASION FOR “CHEAP” LABOR
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/09/the-fall-of-america-by-invitation-tens.html
Open the floodgates of our
welfare state to the uneducated, impoverished, and unskilled masses of the
world and in a generation or three America, as we know it, will be gone. JOHN
BINDER
But many
less-skilled migrants play their largest role by simply shifting small slices
of wealth from person to person, for example, by competing up rents in their
neighborhood or by competing down wages in their workplace. The crudest
examples can be seen in agriculture.
Overall, the
Washington-imposed economic policy of economic growth via immigration shifts
wealth from young people towards older people by flooding the
market with cheap
white-collar and blue-collar foreign labor.
CALIFORNIA UNDER THE DEMOCRATS: Worst Lower
Education System in the Nation!
"California’s public education system,
once the envy of the world, now ranks 49th in the nation." ROBERT J. CRISTANO, Ph.D
Accounting for these differences reveals that California's
real poverty rate is 20.6 percent – the
highest in America, and nearly twice the national average of 12.7 percent.
"The public schools indoctrinate their young charges to
hate this country and the rule of law. Illegal aliens continue
overwhelming the state, draining California’s already depleted public
services while endangering our lives, the rule of law, and public safety
for all citizens."
IMMIGRATION AS ECONOMIC WAR ON THE AMERICAN
MIDDLE-CLASS.
However, the dominant force in American politics for the last
two decades has been economic warfare against American citizens.
This economic warfare has two primary components; the use of
government to economically favor one group over another; and the collusion of
immigrant groups to economically inhibit Americans who oppose replacement
migration.
JOSHUA FOXWORTH – AMERICAN THINKER
"This is country
belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This is a common
teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to Mexicans, which is taught
to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a LA Raza educational program
funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA
$800,000.00 in March of 2009!
The “mother of all caravans” is forming in Central America, and our
border-enforcement system is at “the breaking point” — all because Democrats in Congress
rejects any effort to plug the legal loopholes that drive the accelerating flood at the
border. In effect, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are doing just what Cesar
Chavez complained about 40 years ago: placating employers by allowing the
unhindered importation of cheap labor to undermine the efforts of American
workers to negotiate higher wages. MARK KRIKORIAN
THE
AMNESTY HOAX
But the business community will have little
reason to defend Trump, partly because they have gotten their double-shot of
tax cuts and cheap labor. In fact, the legislation does not sunset the amnesty,
meaning it can be quietly expanded with a few legal tweaks that can be attached
to any of the myriad obscure bills annually passed by Congress.
Yes, it is by invitation of the Democrat and
Republican parties on behalf of their rich paymasters!
"Critics argue that
giving amnesty to 12 to 30 million illegal aliens in the U.S. would have an
immediate negative impact on America’s working and middle class — specifically
black Americans and the white working class — who would be in direct
competition for blue-collar jobs with the largely low-skilled illegal alien population."
JOHN BINDER
The U.S.-born baby is, of course, a
U.S. citizen, whose illegal alien parents are eligible to receive, on the
baby’s behalf, food stamps, nutrition from the Women, Infants, and Children
(WIC) program, and numerous tax benefits, including the EITC.
Most importantly, the newborn is
deportation insurance for its parents. Illegal aliens facing deportation can
argue that to deport one or more parents would create an “extreme hardship” for
the new baby. If an immigration officer agrees, we’ve added a new adult to the
nation’s population. At age 21 the former birthright citizen baby can formally
apply for green cards for parents and siblings, and they, in turn, can start
their own immigration chains.
US now has more Spanish speakers
than Spain – only Mexico has more
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/29/us-second-biggest-spanish-speaking-country
·
US has 41 million native speakers plus 11 million who are
bilingual
·
New Mexico, California, Texas and Arizona have highest
concentrations
AMNESTY
AND WIDE OPEN BORDERS IN THE AGE OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM: It's all about
keeping wages depressed!
However, the dominant
force in American politics for the last two decades has been economic warfare
against American citizens.
This economic warfare has
two primary components; the use of government to economically favor one group
over another; and the collusion of immigrant groups to economically inhibit
Americans who oppose replacement migration.
JOSHUA FOXWORTH – AMERICAN
THINKER
MEXICO’S INVASION by invitation!
"The amnesty activist also said that the “border has been a
crooked proposition from the beginning, and it will continue to be twisted to
meet political ends,” adding that many open-borders activists still insist that
“people didn’t cross the border, the border crossed them.”
“At some point we will have to accept the fact that the border
between Mexico and the United States is nothing more than an invention. It was
demarcated in 1848, following a war that cost Mexico about half its territory
(it’s no coincidence that cities like Los Angeles, San Antonio and San
Francisco have Spanish names),” Ramos said. “Also, it’s been said a thousand
times that many people didn’t cross the border, the border crossed them. And
the cultural and commercial ties between the two sides remain in place to this
day. Look at the fellowship exhibited by cities like El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad
Juárez, Mexico even if barbed wire and concrete barriers have been erected in
some places along the divide.” LA RAZA SUPREMACIST JORGE RAMOS
1. What nation occupied
the land for 300 years on which Mexicans now live?
2. What nation purchased 525,000 sq. miles of that land from Mexico for $15 million dollars?
3. What nation has a tougher immigration policy than the one who bought the land?
4. What nation built a wall along its Southern border to keep out illegal aliens?
5. What nation has millions of Mexican and Central American immigrants who came here legally and who don't want any illegal immigrants invading their country, stealing their jobs and bringing gangs, crime, drugs, infectious disease and human trafficking along with them?
6. What nation has millions of legal Latino immigrants who are proud to be citizens of a host country that is a sovereign nation with defined borders and with more individual freedoms and economic opportunities than any place on earth?
7. What people would like to tell the race-baiting, Jose Ramos, "Vete a la mierda!"?
2. What nation purchased 525,000 sq. miles of that land from Mexico for $15 million dollars?
3. What nation has a tougher immigration policy than the one who bought the land?
4. What nation built a wall along its Southern border to keep out illegal aliens?
5. What nation has millions of Mexican and Central American immigrants who came here legally and who don't want any illegal immigrants invading their country, stealing their jobs and bringing gangs, crime, drugs, infectious disease and human trafficking along with them?
6. What nation has millions of legal Latino immigrants who are proud to be citizens of a host country that is a sovereign nation with defined borders and with more individual freedoms and economic opportunities than any place on earth?
7. What people would like to tell the race-baiting, Jose Ramos, "Vete a la mierda!"?
ANSWERS:
1. Spain
2. United States
3. Mexico
4. Mexico
5. United States
6. United States
7. Latino Americans and other Americans who are not liberal Democrats.
2. United States
3. Mexico
4. Mexico
5. United States
6. United States
7. Latino Americans and other Americans who are not liberal Democrats.
America Created Just 20,000 Jobs in February...and
those all went to foreign born!
Exclusive–Mo Brooks:
‘Masters of the Universe’ Want More Immigration to ‘Decrease In mes of
Americans’
Consequently,
the pumping of ultra-cheap money into the financial system, fueling speculation
and parasitism, together with ever-widening social inequality, is not
a temporary measure but must be made permanent.
The declining living standards of
the working class are feeding directly into the retail apocalypse and
mass layoffs of retail workers will only exacerbate the issue.
Workers’ wages have seen little to no
growth in the last four decades, and any economic growth experienced
since 2008 has gone to
“US household net worth sees biggest fall since crisis”
“Trump Touts Legal Immigration System for
‘Our Corporations’ at Expense of
American Workers “– JOHN
BINDER
Trump’s
shift from a wage-boosting legal immigration system to one that benefits corporations
and their shareholders coincides with recent big business lobby influence over
his White House, at the behest of advisers Jared Kushner and Brooke Rollins.
“Trump Abandons ‘America First’ Reforms: ‘We
Need’ More Immigration to Grow Business Profits” JOHN BINDER
Additionally, Koch spokespeople at the donors’ conference said the
network has its sights set on pushing amnesty for millions of illegal aliens
this year.
DYING AMERICA: Poverty,
Open Borders, Widespread Homelessness, Housing Crisis, Opioids, Corrupt
Politicians and Then Suicide!
"In a state like Florida, where immigrants make up about 25.4
percent of the labor force, American workers have their weekly wages reduced by
perhaps more than 12.5 percent. In California, where immigrants make up 34
percent of the labor force, American workers’ weekly wages are reduced by
potentially 17 percent." JOHN BINDER
"In the
last decade alone, the U.S. admitted ten million legal immigrants,
forcing American workers to compete against a growing population of low-wage
foreign workers. Meanwhile, if legal immigration continues, there will be 69
million foreign-born residents
living in the U.S. by 2060. This would represent an unprecedented electoral
gain for the Left, as Democrats win about 90 percent of
congressional districts where the foreign-born population exceeds the national
average."
THE INVASION!
MEXICO UNDER, OVER
AND OCCUPYING AMERICA AT STAGGERING COSTS
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2019/04/mexico-in-meltdown-narco-state-pouring.html
"While other witnesses at Mr. Guzmán’s trial in Federal District Court in
Brooklyn have testified about huge payoffs from traffickers to the Mexican
police and public officials, the testimony about Mr. Peña Nieto was the most
egregious allegation yet. If true, it suggests that corruption by drug cartels
had reached into the highest level of Mexico’s political establishment."
*
The former president of Mexico, Enrique Peña Nieto,
took a $100 million bribe from Joaquín
Guzmán Loera, the infamous crime lord known as El Chapo, according to a witness at Mr. Guzman’s trial. ALAN FEUER
Guzmán Loera, the infamous crime lord known as El Chapo, according to a witness at Mr. Guzman’s trial. ALAN FEUER
“Mexican drug cartels are the “other” terrorist threat to
America. Militant Islamists have the goal of destroying the United
States. Mexican drug cartels
are now accomplishing that mission – from within, every day, in
virtually every community across this country.” JUDICIAL WATCH
Migrant enclaves already are at the top of the U.S. lists for
bad places to live - 10 of the 50 worst places in America to live
according to this list are in California, and all of
them are famous for their illegal populations. MONICA SHOWALTER
California—not Mississippi, New Mexico, or West Virginia—has
the highest poverty rate in the United States. According to the Census Bureau’s
Supplemental Poverty Measure—which accounts for the cost of housing, food,
utilities, and clothing, and which includes noncash government assistance as a
form of income—nearly one out of four Californians is poor. Kerry Jackson
California’s de facto status as a one-party state lies at the
heart of its poverty problem. With a permanent majority in the state senate and
the assembly, a prolonged dominance in the executive branch, and a weak
opposition, California Democrats have long been free to indulge blue-state
ideology while paying little or no political price. The state’s poverty problem
is unlikely to improve while policymakers remain unwilling to unleash the
engines of economic prosperity that drove California to its golden years. Kerry Jackson
As Breitbart
News reported, if chain migration is not ended —
as President Donald Trump has demanded — the U.S. electorate will forever be
changed, with between seven to eight million new foreign-born individuals being
eligible to vote because of chain migration, and overall, an additional 15
million new foreign-born voters.
Missouri Senator Claire McCaskillhas identified
California Senator Kamala Harris as the party leader on issues of immigration
and race. Harris wants a moratorium on construction of new immigration-detention facilities in favor of the old “catch and release” policy for illegal aliens, and has
urged a shutdown of the government rather than compromise on mass amnesty.
No Justice for Taxpaying Americans
By Howie Carr
But the real double standard kicks in when the undocumented Democrat gets to the courtroom. A taxpaying American can only dream of the kid-gloves treatment these Third World fiends get.
By Howie Carr
But the real double standard kicks in when the undocumented Democrat gets to the courtroom. A taxpaying American can only dream of the kid-gloves treatment these Third World fiends get.
Illegal aliens continue
overwhelming the state, draining California’s already depleted public services
while endangering our lives, the rule of law, and public safety for all
citizens. Arthur Schaper
The Federation for
American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on
government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid,
and criminal justice system costs. STEVEN BALDWIN
Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan
Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of
all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in
2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that
in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were
illegal aliens.
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S WAR ON AMERICA’S
LEGAL WORKERS, BORDERS AND LAWS as they build the LA RAZA welfare state on our
backs.
One in every eleven persons born in Mexico has gone to the U.S. The National Review reported that in 2014 $1.87 billion was spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds of billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr.
"Chairman
of the DNC Keith Ellison was even spotted wearing a
shirt stating, "I don't believe in borders" written in Spanish.
According
to a new CBS news poll, 63
percent of Americans in competitive congressional districts think those crossing
illegally should be immediately deported or arrested. This is
undoubtedly contrary to the views expressed by the Democratic Party.
Their
endgame is open borders, which has become evident over the last eight
years. Don't for one second let them convince you otherwise." Evan Berryhill Twitter @EvBerryhill.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/07/assault-on-american-worker-college-grad.html
Mexican
Invasion
By
Tom Barrett (04/19/2005)
At the current rate of invasion (mostly
through Mexico, but also through Canada) the United States will be completely
over run with illegal aliens by the year 2025.
I’m not talking about legal immigrants who follow US law to become citizens. In
less than 20 years, if we do not stop the invasion, ILLEGAL aliens and their
offspring will be the dominant population in the United States. According to US
Border Control (see LINK below). “They will have made such inroads into the
political and social systems that they will have more influence than our
Constitution over how the U.S. is governed. The ugly consequence of an ignored
U.S. Constitution is already taking place.” The millions upon millions of
illegal aliens streaming into the US are the foundation for what could be another
attempt at secession by several US states. Many of them will use
ill-conceived programs that reward illegal immigration to become US citizens. Other
illegals will simply go to the polls and vote without taking the trouble to
apply for citizenship. Together, these groups could form a voting block
that could tear our nation apart. Those of you who read the email version
of this column should go to www.ConservativeTruth.org to see the map posted there. It shows the
borders of a new nation proposed by influential Mexican nationals and Hispanic
US Citizens. (See LINK below: Professor Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland'.) It
includes six northern states of Mexican, as well as Texas, New Mexico,
Arizona, California, and southern Colorado. The idea of a Hispanic Homeland
could be ignored as the pipedream of crackpots if a substantial majority of
Mexican citizens did not support it. A Zogby poll of Mexicans done in June 2002
revealed that a substantial majority of Mexican citizens believe that
southwestern America properly belongs to Mexico. They said that Mexicans do not
need the permission of the U.S. to enter this territory. 58 percent of Mexican
citizens agreed with this statement: "The territory of the United States'
southwest rightfully belongs to Mexico." Only 28 percent disagreed with
the statement. Listen to what some Mexican government officials and US leaders
(including politicians and Professors at taxpayer-funded Universities) have to
say on this subject. Jose Angel Gutierrez, professor, University of Texas,
Arlington and founder of La Raza Unida political party screams at rallies:
"We have an aging white America. They are dying. They are ******** in
their pants with fear! I love it! We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what
I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill
him!" (See LINK below.) Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council
"They’re afraid we’re going to take over the governmental institutions and
other institutions. They’re right. We will take them over. Mario Obledo,
California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Jerry Brown,
who was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Bill Clinton, says,
“California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn’t like it should
leave." Proposition 187 was the California initiative supported by a
majority of Californians that denied taxpayer funds for services to
non-citizens. Speaking at a Latino gathering in response to Proposition 187’s
passage in 1995, Art Torres, the Chairman of the California Democratic Party,
said: "Power is not given to you. You have to take it. Remember, 187 is
the last gasp of white America in California." The national newspaper of
Mexico, Excelsior: "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning
to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot." Gloria
Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor: "We are politicizing every single
one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country...I gotta
tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I’m going to go out there and
vote because I want to pay them back." Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul
General: “We are practicing ‘La Reconquista’ in California." "Reconquista"
means the reconquest of the US southwest by Mexico. (See LINK below.). These
people are serious! They think they are going to take US territory. The Mexican
President declared it here in our country, and Bill Clinton signed a
Presidential Executive Order that paves the way for at least part of Mexico’s
dream. Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo said in Chicago on July 23, 1997,
"I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the
territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important – a
very important – part of this. For this reason, my government proposed a
constitutional amendment to allow any Mexican with the right and the desire to
acquire another nationality to do so without being forced to first give up his
or her Mexican nationality." Translation: It is next to impossible to
receive Mexican citizenship unless you can prove you are of Mexican descent.
But Mexico knows that the US has soft immigration laws and will grant
citizenship to almost anyone. (After all, we grant citizenship every day to
immigrants from countries who have sworn to destroy us.) So Mexico wants to
take advantage of this ridiculous situation by encouraging their citizens to
apply for US citizenship while keeping Mexican citizenship. That way the
Mexican government can influence the political process here in the US.
Executive Order 13122, signed on May 25, 1999, by the most treasonous president
this nation has ever been cursed with, Bill Clinton, established an Interagency
Task Force on the Economic Development of the Southwest Border. Part of the
Order reads, "The Southwest Border or Southwest Border region is defined
as including the areas up to 150 miles north of the United States-Mexican
border in the States of Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and California." According
to experts on international law, this sets the stage for a 150-mile-wide
“Border Zone” that will neither belong to Mexico or the US. This could then
become the first area of a Hispanic Nation that would eventually encompass the
areas shown in the map of the proposed Republica del Norte (The Northern
Republic). Our government, pushed by liberal Democrats, has been systematically
laying the groundwork for such a breakaway republic. Did you know that
immigrants from Mexico and other non European countries can come to this
country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts? It’s
called affirmative action or racial privilege. Some time ago a vote was taken
in the U.S. Congress to end this practice. It was defeated. Every single Democratic
senator except Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges for
Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants. They were joined by thirteen
Republicans. Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that they believe
that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is good. They have also
backed special privileges for these immigrants. Mexico, a nation that has
benefited enormously from American generosity is now working to destabilize our
country. Is “destabilize” too strong a word? I don’t think so. Whether or not
Mexican leaders think they can actually create enough hatred against “gringos”
to accomplish the creation of a new republic made up of mainly US territory,
they know that pushing that agenda will cause huge political problems here and allow
Mexico to accomplish many of their goals. Is the government of Mexico behind
this? You have seen quotes from a Mexican President and a Mexican Consul
General in support of it. They have everything to gain and little to lose by
pushing it. The Mexican government is also pushing illegal immigration, which
destabilizes our economy. The US Border Control website (see LINK below)
shows an illustration from a Mexican government publication showing their
citizens how to best illegally enter the US. Why? It takes the strain of taking
care of unemployed Mexicans off the Mexican treasury and puts it on the US
treasury. And when the illegals get on welfare, they send some of their money
home, which helps the Mexican economy. All this talk by Mexican and US officials
about the US illegally occupying Mexican territory does nothing but breed
racial hatred. The sad thing is that none of this is about race. It is about
the things that all wars and conflicts are about: Greed, power and money. I
don’t like to talk about a problem without offering a solution. The US
politicians and professors who advocate taking US territory are guilty of
sedition. Remove them from their offices and (hopefully) put them in a federal
penitentiary where they can consider the error of their ways. The Mexican
politicians who do the same are guilty of inciting sedition. This is very close
to an act of war. Immediately cut of all economic aid to Mexico until its
government publicly disavows this lunatic plan. Finally, we must realize that
we can’t stop this by marching US troops into Mexico. We should use troops to
guard our borders, because the US Border Patrol cannot cover the huge US-Mexico
border without help. And we need to use pass laws that will stop the government
from rewarding illegal immigrants at the expense of those who follow the law.
We have a huge immigration problem in this country. This ridiculous Hispanic
Homeland idea is just a symptom of the problem. INTERNET RESEARCH: Professor
Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland' 1. http://www.aztlan.net/homeland.htm
Professor Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland'
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A University of New Mexico Chicano Studies professor
predicts a new, sovereign Hispanic nation within the century, taking in the Southwest
and several northern states of Mexico. Charles Truxillo suggests the “Republica
del Norte,” the Republic of the North, is “an inevitability.” He envisions it
encompassing all of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and southern
Colorado, plus the northern tier of Mexican states: Baja California, Sonora,
Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo León and Tamaulipas. Along both sides of the
U.S.-Mexico border “there is a growing fusion, a reviving of connections,”
Truxillo said. “Southwest Chicanos and Norteño Mexicanos are becoming one
people again.” Truxillo, 47, has said the new country should be brought into
being “by any means necessary,” but recently said it was unlikely to be formed
by civil war. Instead, its creation will be accomplished by the electoral pressure
of the future majority Hispanic population in the region, he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment