Man confronts Elizabeth Warren about her plan to wipe out student loans
While attending a “community conversation” in Grimes, Iowa, this past Monday, a man approached Elizabeth Warren to ask her a question about her student loan plan. He was irked by having debt redistributed and Warren was decidedly unsympathetic.
Warren wants to wipe out student debt – and she claims she can do it with a stroke of her pen via executive order:
[T]he Department of Education already has broad legal authority to cancel student debt, and we can’t afford to wait for Congress to act. So I will start to use existing laws on day one of my presidency to implement my student loan debt cancellation plan that offers relief to 42 million Americans -- in addition to using all available tools to address racial disparities in higher education, crack down on for-profit institutions, and eliminate predatory lending.[snip]Here’s how it will work:
- I’ll direct the Secretary of Education to use their authority to begin to compromise and modify federal student loans consistent with my plan to cancel up to $50,000 in debt for 95% of student loan borrowers (about 42 million people).
- I’ll also direct the Secretary of Education to use every existing authority available to rein in the for-profit college industry, crack down on predatory student lending, and combat the racial disparities in our higher education system.
The plan, of course, ignores the fact that students blithely take on debt despite getting majors in areas that will never result in jobs that enable them to pay off that debt. That is, she intends to reward them – or their families – for being completely irresponsible.
And it is that reward for irresponsibility that saw an irritated man approach Elizabeth Warren to complain about her proposal – and to get from her, in return, her dismissal of his concerns, a laugh, and a smirk.
OUCH
Lizzie is confronted by a father who worked double shifts to pay for his daughters education and wants to know if he gets his money back..
Lizzie smirks..@realDonaldTrump #IOWA
The audio is a bit difficult to hear, but it appears that the man opens the conversation by saying, “My daughter is getting out of school. I’ve saved all my money. She doesn’t have student loans. Am I going to get my money back?”
Warren doesn’t even have the grace to praise him for being responsible. Instead, she responds instantly: “Of course not.”
The man, beginning to be upset, asks, “So you’re going to pay for people who didn’t save any money, and then those of us who did the right thing get screwed?”
And that’s when Warren’s tin-ear and lack of compassion kicks in. She smirks, she shrugs, and she says, “No, it’s not anyone got [sic] screwed….”
“Of course, we did,” says the man. “My buddy had fun, bought a car, went on vacation. I saved my money. He made more than I did, but I worked a double shift for the extra money for my daughter since she was 10. So you’re laughing at me.”
“I’m not,” says Warren.
The man knew what he had seen. “Yeah, that’s exactly what you’re doing. We did the right thing, and then we get screwed.”
As if she’d heard nothing he said, Warren reaches out to shake the man’s hand, saying as she does, “I appreciate it.”
He's having none of it. “Nah, that’s all right,” he says, waving off her proffered hand and walking away.
Not only is Elizabeth Warren a wannabe tyrant who intends to implement plan after plan to incrementally nationalize America’s wealth, she’s also a dumb bunny who, once she’s off-script, has little to say for herself and no compassion. Indeed, that lack of compassion hints that she’s a sister-under-the-skin to the woman who once called half of America “deplorables.”
Democrats Seek Civil War, But Will Get Revolution
Northam and his minions planned all this. They needed to build enough tension to foment the violence necessary to taint all legal gun owners as illegitimate nuts. Members of his administration have threatened calling out the National Guard to seize guns from people whom they hoped would refuse to obey their new legislation. These threats were in response to more than 100 towns, cities, and counties declaring themselves 2nd Amendment “sanctuary” entities where the new laws would not be enforced.
Democrats Seek Civil War, But Will Get Revolution
Democrats conspired with foreign agents, lied, cheated, and denied due process to Donald Trump. If they were willing to do that to a duly elected president in order to obtain power, what should Americans expect them to do to them should they refuse attempts to be disarmed?
Democrats understand that an armed America can say, “No!” And they can’t have that. If they want to radically change the America extant for more than two centuries, they need to first disarm Americans. And they realize asking nicely is not going to accomplish this.
Therefore, the ever-equable Democrats have suffered a recrudescence of their desire for the disease of civil war… a disease that has lain dormant for more than 160 years.
Democrats will do their utmost to create a situation where blood is spilled and lives are lost to engender this war. They believe that only bloodshed will finally get the people on their side, willing to cede to them the control they need to “fundamentally transform the United States of America.”
And they have reached a point where they think they can win.
The solipsist left believes they are on the side of all that is good, just, and reasonable and if Americans must die for them to be in control, it is a small price to pay to attain the country they believe America should be.
In their minds, they have no choice. It is only with solemnity and prayerfulness they make this decision. They, along with their partners in the media, have tried convincing; they’ve tried disguising legislation; they’ve tried imprecation of law-abiding gun owners as un-American. But nothing has worked. Virginia gun laws are about the realization by Democrats that the only way to win is to make Americans the enemy. And the only way to do that is to put blood on their hands.
Finally, with full control of state government, including the governorship, Democrats in Virginia acted with celerity, passing legislation which would result in gun confiscation and negation of our Constitution. Only through a violent and bloody confrontation can they unleash the dogs of war on law-abiding Americans. Virginia may have once been for lovers but after the Democrat machinations, they’re going to need a new tag line.
Virginia is a harbinger of what is to come nationwide. If they succeed in Virginia, they can be expected to try the same tactics in other states run by Democrats.
Governor Northam (most famous for wearing blackface and his positive views on abortion after birth) did his best to provoke bloodshed at the Second Amendment rally held in Richmond this past Monday. He put up fences and declared a state of emergency, illegally banning legally owned and carried guns. He meretriciously dissembled about multiple intelligence agencies warning of imminent violence, even terrorism.
Media, of course, did their part, with serial warnings of violence by the right-wingers and white supremacists the nation was told would comprise the many tens of thousands attending the rally. Their message gleefully warned of inevitable bloodshed deliberately spilled by bad people.
Northam and his minions planned all this. They needed to build enough tension to foment the violence necessary to taint all legal gun owners as illegitimate nuts. Members of his administration have threatened calling out the National Guard to seize guns from people whom they hoped would refuse to obey their new legislation. These threats were in response to more than 100 towns, cities, and counties declaring themselves 2nd Amendment “sanctuary” entities where the new laws would not be enforced.
Obviously, the left only supports “sanctuary” for illegal aliens.
Virginia Democrats don’t realize that making war on Americans who support the Second Amendment while trashing the constitution will not get them the new civil war they think they can win. It will only precipitate a new revolution that will destroy them and their party for a generation.
With the rally having been 100% patriotic and peaceful, with not a single arrest, much less rife with endemic violence, the Democrats have put all their cards on the table. Americans everywhere now understand what is coming. The left is coming for them -- coming for their constitutional rights -- coming for their guns.
Americans are a stubborn and independent people. They are not a passive citizenry; they will never be French. They will never surrender their rights when demanded to by an unholy alliance of politicians, media, and an unelected elite.
They will fight. Americans will never give up their guns. The “left” does not understand what will happen when they task the National Guard and LEOs to take legally owned guns. They live in an echo chamber and can’t conceive of anyone telling them, “no,” much less, “Hell no!”
There will be bloodshed, but it won’t be on their terms. It won’t be civil war, or even civil disobedience, it will be guerilla warfare. It will be revolution.
Some estimate that there are more than 400 million guns in America owned by more than a hundred million citizens. This in a nation of 330 million. Americans are the most well-armed and martially trained electorate to have ever existed in the history of humanity.
Remember, every hunter is something of a sniper.
And with the left concentrated on the coasts and in the big cities, the bulk of America’s landmass is inhabited by hunters and other gun owners who believe owning a gun is a constitutional right.
Discounting the assured defections by LEOs and National Guardsmen -- few people want to kill their neighbors to enforce an unnecessary law -- there are simply not enough men they can deploy to even have a slim chance of success.
Yet, ignoring the aphorism “the enemy always has a say,” the left seems intent on forcing war. They have shown gun owners what they can expect, but are oblivious to the ramifications.
They should expect targeted assassinations of leftist leaders, the targeting of power plants serving the cities and coasts, as well as pipelines and electrical grids. They should expect blockades of cities and the sabotage of telecommunications.
There will be bloodshed and it will probably be widespread. They are foolish in their desires and ignorant of the consequences.
Democrats want this war. Someone should tell them they should be careful what they wish for.
Please follow the author on Twitter @williamlgensert
Democrats Have Become a
Disfigured Reflection of the Party They Once Were
Democrats' Contempt for the Sanctity of Life
Hillary's going to get in
Democrats Have Become a
Disfigured Reflection of the Party They Once Were
In
an amazingly prophetic story by Isaac Bashevis Singer entitled "The Gentleman
from Cracow," about life in the village of Frampol, where "the food
was scarce and the water foul," one day, a young man, a doctor,
arrives in a carriage drawn by eight horses. He tells the villagers
that his wife and baby have just died in childbirth, and his rabbi had advised
him that his melancholy would disappear in Frampol. He begins to
spend a lot of money in the town, and the town prospers as never
before. He finally decides to marry one of the local
women. On the day of the wedding, "the gentleman from Cracow
revealed his true identity." Who is he? Singer
reveals him to us: "He was no longer the young man the villagers had
welcomed, but a creature covered with scales, with an eye in his chest, and on
his forehead a horn that rotated at great speed. His arms were
covered with hair, thorns, and elflocks, and his tail was a mass of live
serpents, for he was none other than Ketev Mriri, Chief of the Devils."
The
above story could be a parable about the Democratic Party, which can now
rightly be called the Leftocratic Party, as it has embraced extremist socialist
and communist views. Its members have morphed from being a voice of
hope as one of America's two great parties to being properly characterized as
unbelievable liars in their animus toward Pres. Donald J. Trump, voices of
perversion as they publicly condemn any reservations expressed about
"gender fluidity," and anti-prosperity as they wax indignant about
Trump's disengagement from various multilateral deals that drain our
economy. Practical and realistic concerns about Islamic terrorist
threats are dismissed with outraged, scowling faces as vicious, maniacal
racism. Further, the so-called impeachment hearings distorted or
discarded almost every time-honored legal norm under our rule of law.
The
Leftocrats are apologists for evil (not just disagreeable) foreign regimes and are against
fundamental Constitutional ideas and structures such as the Tenth Amendment as
they resist federal disengagement from setting nationwide education
priorities. Leftocrats have been vehemently calling for abolition of
the Electoral College. They are cursing the president from every
podium and venue that presents itself and thereby undermine the separation of
powers and demonstrate disrespect for the law of the land since our president
is head of the Executive Branch.
We
see in their contempt for federal marijuana laws, the institution of sanctuary
cities, and their hostility to border enforcement a deranged lack of
perspective regarding the health of our citizens, many of whom are struggling
with or dying from drug usage. The opioid epidemic we face is clearly
connected to the opioid supply, and that, in turn, is clearly a border
issue. Yet they put aside the well-being of so many poor souls
caught by the hook of addiction into ignoring border enforcement in order to
score political hate points against the president. Instead of
looking at border issues in terms of law and national health, they turn
enforcement into an ugly, defamatory argument about American and Trumpian
racism. Only 14 years ago, they were able to agree with Republicans
on the need for stronger border enforcement, whereas now they try to block
every Trump attempt — mandated by the American people — to bring order out of
chaos on our southern border.
Their
ideas of fairness, justice, family, morality, generosity, love, responsibility
are not American in any meaningful way. Instead of promoting
political ideals consistent with the U.S. history of Judeo-Christian ideas and
ideals (based upon a Protestant foundation derived from English speaking
Protestants, albeit with overlays of other Protestant, Catholic, and Jewish
traditions), they have derived most of their ideas from abstractions based
in cultural Marxism.
The
phrase "melting pot" had gained wide currency in 1908, during the
great wave of Slavic, Jewish, and Italian immigration, when Israel Zangwill's
play "The Melting Pot" was produced. In it, a character says with enthusiasm, "America is God's
crucible, the great melting-pot where all the races of Europe are melting and
re-forming!"
Beginning
in the 1960s, instead of the melting pot, the multiculturalists — rooted in the
cultural Marxism of Theodor Adorno, Herbert Marcuse, Eric
Fromm, Antonio Gramsci, and others — began
affirming the diversity "salad bowl" image. Our national
motto: E pluribus unum ("out of many one") has
been stood on its head, whereby the goal of the nation is purported as
fulfilled only by highlighting and praising the distinctions of every
sub-cultural group in the U.S. by age, ethnicity, immigrant status, sexual
deviancy (preference), and all "protected classes." The
cultural Marxists want us to believe that the melting pot ideal was a deception
imposed on society as a whole by white, male, straight Christians and that the
melting pot ideal lacked truth, democratic values, and social
vigor. The masses and certain groups in particular were shunted
aside, dispossessed, ignored, or brutalized. America, despite its
apparent successes, was sucking the hope and lifeblood out of the masses of
people.
For
those of us who have witnessed the progress of African-Americans since the days
of Jim Crow and have experienced the economic and social progress of
generations produced by the dirt-poor, non-English-speaking immigrants, the
harsh criticisms of America by the Leftocrats has morphed into an outrageous
and almost demonic defiance of reason. Where is the balance, the
display of reasonableness, the acceptance of others? Instead, we see
an unbridled, vulgar, destructive mindset on display everywhere in the party of
derangement. Just consider the language used about Trump by Robert De Niro or the mock bloody beheadings of our
president. Consider the evil assassin who tried to kill Republican congressmen in Florida.
The
Democrats now rightly can be renamed Leftocrats. Their hostility to
President Trump has reached pathological dimensions or worse. Their
mantras about the "top 1%" or "top 0.1%" have become the
tip of a spear of seemingly bottomless hatred for our president, our history,
our legal structures, our institutions, our religious heritage, our language,
and our achievements in every sphere of human endeavor. They have
left the realm of constructive criticism and have moved even beyond destructive
criticism into the pathological domain of hysterical dementia — or, as with
Singer's story, a level of unhingedness even beyond the ken of psychiatry.
Democrats' Contempt for the Sanctity of Life
Ed Buck, a prominent Democrat donor and fundraiser, has
been charged with battery,
administering illegal drugs, and operating a drug house. The charges
paint a disturbing picture of this wealthy scion of liberal
politics. At this time, two men have been identified as having died
and a third having been seriously harmed, but prosecutors are said to have
found hundreds of photographs "of men in compromising positions" who may have
been lured to Buck's home with the promise of money, shelter, and drugs.
This case raises many questions, not just concerning the several
felonies with which Buck has been charged, but about the morality of this and
other prominent liberals. On what basis could any human being engage
in sexual conduct with "hundreds" of unfortunate human beings, using
them like playthings and then casting them aside? What does such
conduct suggest about the capacity of some individuals to use others for their
personal pleasure, regardless of the dangerous consequences
involved?
Certainly, conservatives are far from perfect, but at least
conservatives do not flaunt their iniquities. Conservatives as
individuals possess all the imperfections of other men, but they still ascribe
to an ideal of goodness and virtue. The same cannot be said for
liberals, who believe that they should rack up as much pleasure as possible in
this world because they are sure there's no life after death.
For liberals, what happens in the Oval Office stays in the Oval
Office. Many Democrats thought Bill Clinton was just being Clinton
and that there was nothing especially immoral about conducting affairs with
aides, state employees, actresses, and nursing home managers. Was this
because they did not appreciate the sanctity of those who served as mere
diversion for our 42nd president?
Just what is so appealing to liberals about promiscuity,
anyway? Is it just sex, or is there a special satisfaction in
transgressing traditional moral codes? Is it the idea that one is
"bigger" than the law? Or is it that liberals believe that
the rules no longer apply? Is it beneath them to believe in marital
fidelity and lifetime devotion to one's spouse? Liberals think they
are too sophisticated for this kid of trust, just as they think telling the
truth is Boy Scout stuff and election promises are made to be
broken. "If you like your doctor, you can keep your
doctor." Yeah, right.
Conservatives are different. We at least hold up the
ideal of devotion, honesty, and truth-telling, and though we're not perfect, we
try to be. That's especially the case when it involves the sanctity
of life. Conservatives defend the unborn, defend their families, and
defend their God-given liberties. Conservatives know that all of
God's creation is sacred, and it is that knowledge that makes them act with
restraint and care. That is the essence of conservatism.
The essence of liberalism, as I see it, is a lack of restraint
rooted in egotism and self. The Warren presidential campaign is a
perfect example. If elected, Elizabeth Warren will, according to her
own admission, attempt
to closely regulate all large businesses, eliminate fracking
and the jobs that go with it, provide Medicare for All, dictate health care
decisions (including practically unlimited abortion "rights"),
eliminate capital punishment, raise taxes on the wealthy and on corporations,
provide free college, cancel student debt, eliminate the Electoral College, ban
assault weapons, open our borders, legalize marijuana, and significantly cut
the defense budget.
Warren's policies show her
to be an extremist driven by ideology rather than concern for the individuals whom
she would tax, endanger, disenfranchise, and tyrannize with regulation and
social mandates. Where is her concern for the individuals whose
lives she would alter so radically with her sweeping reforms? Those
lives are sacred, their right to prosper and save is sacred, and their right to
safety and security is sacred. Warren does not seem to have thought
much about the dangers of unrestrained immigration or the fact that a weakened
national defense will put all Americans at risk. What is she
describing is tyranny, plain and simple.
The most obvious example of liberal denial of the sanctity of
life, of course, is liberals' position on abortion. For any person
who truly believes in the sanctity of life, abortion must be
repugnant. One point six million abortions, terminating
approximately one quarter of all pregnancies, are performed every year in the
U.S. At this rate, that would amount to 80 million abortions over
the past 50 years. Imagine the loss of those beautiful human souls.
Or are they
beautiful? Liberals do not believe so. They tell us that
the earth has become overpopulated. It is "the earth" that
matters and not human beings. Or they say the mothers of those
unborn children would not be able to care for them and that the children would
just become a burden on the State. The "burden on the
State" is more important than the unborn child.
What you will never hear from a liberal is the idea that every
child, born and unborn, is sacred. A child is worth that burden and
worth the stress he purportedly places on "the earth." A
time is coming when America will wish that it had those 80 million souls to
defend it and help it prosper. That ability to contribute to society
and pursue economic opportunity, and to fight if necessary to defend one's
home, is another side of what makes every child sacred. Children are
sacred because of their capacity for goodness, beauty, and life, but also
because they will grow into adults who take responsibility for themselves and
for their neighbors.
Would any conservative vote to end the life of 80 million human
beings?
I believe that every human being is God's creation and that
everyone is born with the potential to contribute and achieve. Our
Founders believed in limited government because they too believed in human
potential, and they feared the tyranny of authoritarianism. They had
reason to fear, having lived under the yoke of British colonial rule.
It is no accident that those who seek a vast expansion of
government power today also oppose the sanctity of life. A free
people engaged in productive endeavors will never vote for a socialist who will
suppress their freedom. What today's tyrants fear above all is a
public that believes in the sanctity of life and is willing to stand up for it.
Jeffrey Folks is the author
of many books and articles on American culture including Heartland
of the Imagination (2011).
So is running for president now a corrupt Democrat's 'get out of jail free'
card?
Based on today's
standards, promoted in Congress and the press, Democratic Party candidates,
such as Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden, can greatly enrich their
families with massive amounts of money from foreign parties, and a Republican
president or its Justice department are not even allowed to bring up their
names, let alone research their obvious corruption. Most of the media and
other Democrats are now calling President Trump's bid to get to the bottom of
the ongoing corruption we see 'impeachable' and they couldn't care less about
corruption as they preach that no one is above the law.
Democrats can seek trash
on their Republican opponents from foreign nationals and not only do most
journalists and other Democrats not care, they can use a fake dossier
full of opposition research as grist for an FBI investigation in their bid to
take out Trump. Then, if Trump brings up Biden’s name to a foreign leader, they
call that illegal and impeachable.
A Democrat, her staff and
many at the State Department and other agencies can continually violate the
nation's security laws (as Clinton did) and the Justice Department inexplicably
lets her off. Most journalists and other Democrats support her and call it
partisan to look at the clear violations of the law as they lecture everyone
that no one is above the law.
A Democrat and her spouse
can physically and mentally abuse women (again, the Clinton pair) and seek to
destroy anyone who gets in their way as they amass power. Most
journalists and other Democrats don’t give a damn about any of the abused women
with credible claims against Bill or Hillary Clinton even as they say how
pro-women they are.
A Democrat commits fraud
throughout her adult life by lying about her heritage to move up the economic
ladder (Elizabeth Warren) and most journalists and other Democrats will support
her. In fact, they've made her the frontrunner in the current Democratic
nomination for president polls.
Democrat candidates can
seek to destroy and impeach Judge Brett Kavanaugh based on articles the media
has published with no evidence to support the stories. And the media pretends
their stories are based on facts. How can they expect the public to believe
them when they ran years of stories on Russian collusion when there was never
any evidence?
Democrat candidates
continually lie about what Trump said in Charlottesville and lie about
Ferguson, Missouri to gin up racial hate and violence and they are
supported wholeheartedly by the complicit media as they pretend they are the
party of unity and the truthful party.
Democrat bureaucrats in
the Obama administration, at Justice, CIA, other intelligence agencies and at
the State Department continually lie to justify spying to take out Trump while
they protect Hillary from prosecution. But if the Trump administration looks at
the origins of the fake Russian collusion narrative, that is impeachable and
partisan. The compliant media doesn’t give a darn about the clear violations of
the law and abuse of power while they continually say that no one is above the
law.
A Democrat president
can violate the Constitution with DACA, be flexible with Russia, give kickbacks
to Iran tyrants, stop an investigation into drug running by terrorists to
appease Iran, violate bankruptcy laws, have slush funds at Justice, CFPB and
EPA to reward political supporters, illegally unmask names of people
surrounding Trump, leave Americans to die in Libya while concocting a lie, spy
illegally on thousands of Americans, imprison reporters, look the other way as
his Secretary of State violates security laws and takes kickbacks, Look the
other way as Obama administration officials such as Eric Holder, John Brennan,
James Clapper, Susan Rice and others commit perjury, withhold documents from
Congress for years on Fast and Furious, prosecute whistleblowers for violation
of the espionage act, cage and separate children at the border and all his
conversations with foreign leaders will remain private.
As the media watched all
this clear corruption unfold throughout eight years of Obama, almost all
journalists and other Democrat supported him, called him brilliant and to this
date pretend the Obama administration was scandal-free as they tell the public
that no one is above the law.
Known serial liars
Clapper, Brennan, Holder, plus creepy porn lawyer Michael Avenatti are
treated as reliable sources by almost all media outlets as they trash Trump.
Meanwhile, whatever Trump
does is impeachable, even if it is only bringing up Biden’s name to investigate
clear corruption. According to the media, as they collude with other Democrats,
it appears that every one of Trump’s phone calls should be made public.
And any disgruntled
Democrat bureaucrat who leaks information, whether or not they had firsthand
knowledge, should be treated as a protected whistleblower instead of a leaker.
Republicans are welcome
as reliable sources in the media, like Senators Mitt Romney, John McCain or
Jeff Flake, as long as they are trashing Trump. Otherwise they are not
welcome.
It is so hard to spot the
bias as the media trashes Trump and his supporters, daily, with every name in
the book and lecture the public that no one is above the law and how the
Democrat party is the party of unity.
Image credit: Photo illustration by
Monica Showalter with use of image by Michael Vadon, via
Wikimedia Commons // CC BY-SA 2.0.
Hillary's going to get in
It
is no longer a matter of if but of when. All doubts about Hillary's 2020
plans should have been erased by her appearances this week promoting the book
that she and her daughter “wrote” to say nothing about her mien! She
endlessly reprised her absurd claim
that the election was stolen from her, called for Trump's impeachment, and even
admitted to her gutsiness for standing by her man.
I
think she has always been in the race, covertly, and that she and Bill always
assumed that no candidate would arrive at the convention with enough delegates
to win the nomination on the first ballot, at which point she could be put
forth as a compromise.
Biden's
done for; there is no way he is going to survive the imbroglio surrounding his
son's machinations and profiteering in Ukraine and China. There's too
much there there. It will become inescapable, even to the unwashed, that
the only reason money flowed to Hunter Biden was to gain influence with Joe or
gain benefits through Joe and his network of friends and allies.
Joe’s
always been a placeholder for Hillary, whether he realizes it or not. It’s all
has changed now because Biden's done, and could precipitate Hillary's early
entry into the fray, as not only Biden but Bernie Sanders may be leaving the
field. With their supporters potentially up for grabs, Elizabeth Warren could
end up with a first ballot victory.
Hillary
has to know that she is considered to be unlikable, but I think it is a given
that no one likes Warren,
either. Daniel Greenfield compares her to Hillary here:
Warren’s likability deficit has nothing to do
with her gender....[She ripped] off asbestos victims while pocketing a tidy
sum....The ‘Hillariness’ of Warren doesn’t [just] lie in their shared fabulism
or lack of ethics....[her] a complete lack of qualifications....[or because
both are] inauthentic scolds who suffer from hall monitor syndrome. They spent
their entire lives breaking every rule they could find while awkwardly
fantasizing about running every tiny detail of everyone else’s
lives....[They're] both unlikable because you can’t picture either one having
any fun....[C]ombine that with an obsessive need to monitor, regulate and
eradicate other people’s fun, and you have the miserable essence of the
progressive movement.
Hillary,
and Bill, know that this is their [third] last chance, and they're not going to
let another woman snatch it from her, as that “articulate and
bright and clean and a nice-looking” black guy or that entitled creep
did. So, keep an eye out, for “when” is going to be sooner than anyone
expected.
Now,
can she win this time? Only a fool would count her out. She won't
lose Biden's supporters. Just being a woman will get her many of Warren's
female supporters. Despite Trump's inroads with African-American and
Hispanic voters, she'll find considerable support in those groups. Wall
Street, Hollywood, and the MSM love her. Traditional Democrats, not
wanting four more years of uproar, may return to the fold over Ukraine and the
like.
She'll
work harder this time, if she can uphold under the effort, bringing
Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Michigan, and Wisconsin into the picture.
She'll be better prepared to debate Trump, but that may not mean much since
Trump's hard to out-debate.
Settle
into the chair, get out the popcorn, the show's about to begin. If you
doubt it, then I have a walking trail in Chappaqua to sell you.
The author is retired, his profile may be
found on LinkedIn, and he usually responds to emails sent
to ringchadburn@hotmail.com
.jpg){kind=link}
No comments:
Post a Comment