ILLEGALS &
WELFARE
WE CAN’T TAKE
CARE OF OUR OWN, AND YET WE LET MEXICO BUILD THEIR BILLION DOLLAR WELFARE STATE
ON OUR BACKS!!!
70% OF ILLEGALS GET WELFARE!
“According to the Centers for Immigration
Studies, April '11, at least 70% of Mexican illegal alien families receive some
type of welfare in the US!!! cis.org”
So when cities
across the country declare that they will NOT be sanctuary, guess where ALL the
illegals, criminals, gang members fleeing ICE will go???? straight to your
welcoming city. So ironically the people fighting for sanctuary city status,
may have an unprecedented crime wave to deal with along with the additional
expense.
*
$17 Billion
dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal
aliens, known as anchor babies.
*
$12 Billion dollars
a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children
here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English.
*
$22 billion is
spent on (AFDC) welfare to illegal aliens each year.
*
$2.2 Billion
dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as (SNAP) food
stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.
*
$3 Million
Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.
30% percent of
all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens. Does not include local jails and
State Prisons.
*
2012 illegal
aliens sent home $62 BILLION in remittances back to their countries of
origin. This is why Mexico is getting involved in our politics.
*
$400 Billion
Dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.
THE DISUNITED STATES: The world’s welfare office!
America is a nation with a severe housing crisis, a
million legals who are homeless, tens of millions of legals who have given up
finding a job that pays living wages and yet the borders are wide open to keep
the hordes coming simply to keep wages DEPRESSED.
THE
SLOW DEATH OF PELOSI’S STATE of CALIFORNIA, A WELFARE STATE AND COLONY OF
MEXICO
With
crime soaring, rampant homelessness, sanctuary state status attracting the
highest illegal immigrant population in the country and its “worst state in the U.S. to do business” ranking for more
than a decade, California and its expansive, debt-ridden, progressive
government is devolving into a third-world country. JANET LEVY
AMERICA:
THE WORLD’S WELFARE OFFICE
With
crime soaring, rampant homelessness, sanctuary state status attracting the
highest illegal immigrant population in the country and its “worst state in the U.S. to do business” ranking for more
than a decade, California and its expansive, debt-ridden,
progressive government is devolving into a third-world country. JANET
LEVY
"This
is how they will destroy America from within. The leftist
billionaires who orchestrate these plans are wealthy. Those tasked with
representing us in Congress will never be exposed to the cost of the
invasion of millions of migrants. They have nothing but contempt for
those of us who must endure the consequences of our communities being intruded
upon by gang members, drug dealers and human traffickers. These
people have no intention of becoming Americans; like the Democrats who welcome
them, they have contempt for us." PATRICIA McCARTHY
"Most
Californians, who have seen their taxes increase while public services
deteriorate, already know the impact that mass illegal immigration is having on
their communities, but even they may be shocked when they learn just how much
of a drain illegal immigration has become." FAIR President Dan Stein
WE
SAT AND WATCHED WHILE THEY DESTROYED OUR COUNTRY!
We
are now in the process of destabilizing our own country. FROSTY WOOLDRIGE
Welfare for
Refugees Cost Americans $123 Billion in 10 Years ….YOUR TAX DOLLARS AT WORK!
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/10/frosty-wooldridge-let-us-open-us.html
THE CONSPIRACY TO
SABOTAGE HOMELAND SECURITY
The
Democrat Party’s secret agenda for wider open borders, more welfare for
invading illegals, more jobs and free anything they illegally vote for…. All to
destroy the two-party system and build the GLOBALISTS’ DEMOCRAT PARTY FOR WIDER
OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED.
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/11/frontpage-hidden-agenda-of-pueblo-sin.html
Demonstrably
and irrefutably the Democrat Party became the party whose principle objective
is to thoroughly transform the nature of the American electorate by means of
open borders and the mass, unchecked importation of illiterate third world
peasants who will vote in overwhelming numbers for Democrats and their La Raza
welfare state. FRONTPAGE MAG
Washington, D.C., political establishment blocks minimum wage increase for city’s tipped workers
The Washington Post published an article last week which further exposes the fraudulent character of the Democratic Party’s supposed concern for the interests of working people.
The article, titled “D.C. officials passed a law to help tipped workers after repealing a wage increase. It was never funded,” notes that “[m]ore than a year after D.C. lawmakers overturned a voter-approved initiative to raise the wages of tipped workers, city officials have yet to implement measures to improve working conditions for food servers and bartenders.”
In October 2018 the Democratic Party-controlled Council of the District of Columbia, the legislative body of the United States’ capital city, repealed a voter-approved ballot item, Initiative 77, which would have eliminated the minimum-wage exemption businesses use to heavily exploit tipped workers—ranging from waitresses and waiters, bartenders, parking attendants, and nail salon workers, to name a few.
The initiative was ratified by voters in June 2018 by over a 10-point margin despite heavy opposition from Democratic Mayor Muriel E. Bowser and the council. In a brazen act of subservience to the restaurant and tourist industry, the legislature overturned the public’s vote, replacing it with a toothless bill titled “Tipped Wage Workers Fairness Amendment Act of 2018.”
“If the law is a bad law, it should be amended or repealed. It does not matter if the law was adopted by the council, the voters or Congress,” D.C. Council Chairman Phil Mendelson declared at the time. A subsequent effort to amend the initiative by exempting bartenders and other workers who expressed concern that raising their wages would decrease tips was likewise shot down by the legislature’s majority.
The new bill, which did nothing to raise wages for tipped workers who can make as low as $3.89 per hour plus gratuity in a city where the average rent for a two-bedroom apartment is an outrageous $3,100 a month, was supposed to create a Tipped Worker Coordinating Council, along with a hotline for workers to report wage theft and sexual harassment along with minimum-wage law training for restaurant managers. The city, moreover, said it would set aside $700,000 for a website informing workers about their labor rights and an additional $100,000 for a public awareness campaign.
However, even this pitiful consolation proved to be too much for the city’s government. Fully in the pocket of big business, Mayor Bowser and Chairman Mendelson, who draws a yearly salary of $210,000 for his work on the council, never included the $2.6 million in the city’s latest budget necessary to enforce these cosmetic initiatives.
The callous behavior of the city’s lawmakers provoked denunciation even from supporters. “It’s egregious because they overturned a vote and they claimed they were going to do all this stuff to get at the issues people cared about and never did. It tells voters they don’t matter, they don’t count,” Reverend Grayland Hagler told the Post.
Mendelson placed the blame on the public for his legislature’s blatant disregard for low wage workers, citing the group responsible for placing Initiative 77 on the ballot, Restaurant Opportunities Center D.C., for failing to “lobby us as far as I know.”
ThinkProgress and Public Citizen analyzed the past two District election cycles starting in 2018 and discovered that restaurant industry lobbyists contributed more than $236,000 to the campaigns of Mayor Bowser as well as multiple council members. Over half went to three people: Bowser, Mendelson, and former Democratic mayor and current member of the council, Vincent Gray, all of whom opposed the ballot.
On Wednesday, Bowser denounced the District legislature after an ethics probe of long-serving Democratic councilman Jack Evans revealed numerous conflicts of interest, forcing the latter to announce his resignation. After admitting Evans made “some very significant mistakes,” Bowser, referring to the few council members who had expressed support for the wage bill, lamented the existence of “enemies of economic development on the council, and that concerns me.”
Restaurant and other tipped workers comprise one of the most exploited sections of the working class. If the total earnings of a worker fall short of city’s current poverty-level minimum wage of $14, employers are, according to law, supposed to make up the difference. Under such conditions, a worker earning the minimum wage working full-time would earn less than $30,000 a year.
The overturned Initiative 77, though slightly increasing the wages of workers, would have done nothing to decrease poverty and low wages in the nation’s capital. As with many cities across the country that have instituted minimum wage increases, Initiative 77 would not have allowed tipped workers to make the minimum wage until 2026; by then, inflation would have eaten up most of the increase in wages.
According to SmartAsset, in 2019, the average amount of rent paid annually for a two-bedroom apartment in the nation’s capital is an outrageous $37,200 a year, making D.C. the third most expensive city in the US. The average rent accounts for nearly half of the median household income which is $82,000 a year. As of 2018, the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness reported there were 6,904 individuals living homeless in the District of Columbia. According to the U.S. Census, over 111,000 people, or 17.4 percent of the city’s population, live in poverty.
THE DEMOCRAT AMNESTY IS NON-ENFORCEMENT OR DISMANTLING OUR
BORDERS INCH BY ILLEGAL
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY IS THE PARTY OF OPEN BORDERS, CHEAP LABOR, WELFARE FOR ILLEGAL AND NO LEGAL NEED APPLY!
Democrat
Attorneys General Demand Fast-Track Work Permits for Illegals and Migrants
15 Jan 20201,570
11:03
Twenty-one top Democrat state
officials are trying to block a White House reform that would protect
Americans’ jobs and wages from hundreds of thousands of illegal migrants and
economic migrants who try to get U.S. jobs.
“That’s
bad for immigrants,” said a tweet from New Jersey’s Democrat attorney
general, Gurbir Grewal. Agency officials “want to delay & deny work permits
for asylum seekers.”
“This
proposal is cruel and legally questionable at best,” said California’s
Democrat attorney general, Xavier Becerra. Migrants “who do not enter the
country through a port of entry or have resided in the United States for more
than a year would now be summarily denied access to a work permit,” he said.
The draft
proposal would end the long-standing agency practice of quickly giving one-year
work permits to migrants who ask for asylum, and also illegal immigrants who
ask for green cards. For example, it would withhold work permits from Central
American asylum seekers for more than a year after they present themselves at a
U.S. border post, and it would end the policy of providing
temporary work permits to long-term illegals. The rule would also deny work
permits to migrants who apply for asylum after sneaking into the United States.
The lax work
permit policies were pushed by Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama. The
policies have provided millions of work permits to migrants. That huge supply
of imported labor boosts investors and companies by undercutting blue-collar
and white-collar wages, and it encourages more illegal migration.
The scale of
this work permit economy is sketched by the Department of Homeland Security. A
January 14 chart shows that at least
1,726,688 got work permits in 2019, alongside the roughly four million
Americans who turned 18 during the year.
The federal
government “estimates that 305,000 asylum seekers will be affected by the
Proposed Rule in the first year alone, with just under 300,000 affected in
subsequent years,” according to the complaint by the 21 attorneys
general.
“This
important new regulatory initiative has had far less media coverage than it
merits,” said Dale Wilcox, general counsel of the Immigration Reform Law
Institute (IRLI).
“The new regulation is complex but cohesive
in its three-part strategy to deter aliens from filing fraudulent or otherwise
defective asylum claims,” said a January 14 statement from the IRLI:
Aliens who
illegally cross the border instead of applying for asylum at a port of entry
will be ineligible to work until they are actually granted asylum. All
applicants must appear at USCIS offices to provide fingerprints, photos, and
other biodata before becoming eligible to apply for work permission. IRLI
agrees with the government that this will greatly improve screening for
ineligible criminal aliens, a major problem in this area.
…
Longstanding
federal statutes bar asylum applications filed more than a year after arrival,
and sanction applications that are “frivolous.” The new reforms restrict or
eliminate more than a dozen loopholes in the regulations implementing these
statutes. These loopholes have been used by immigration lawyers and
anti-borders activists to make incomplete and often dishonest applications,
many thousands of which are received eight or even ten years after the aliens
first illegally crossed our borders.
“The
[courtroom] backlogs in adjudicating all these [asylum] claims result in almost
automatic employment authorization, which depresses the wages of American
workers and is a magnet for further illegal entry,” said the IRLI statement. “We applaud the
administration for taking this important step to protect American workers and
gain control of the border.”
A Rasmussen survey shows likely voters by 2:1 want
Congress to make companies hire & train US grads & workers instead of
importing more foreign workers.
The survey also shows this $/class-based view co-exists
w/ much sympathy for illegal migrants. #S386http://bit.ly/2ZA6WIE
Rasmussen Shows 2:1 Opposition to Cheap Labor Legal
Immigration
The Democrat attorneys
general submitted their objections during the comment
period on draft regulations.
The
regulation contradicts the pro-migration “Nation of Immigrants” narrative, say
the Democrats:
We, the
undersigned Attorneys General of New Jersey, California, the District of
Columbia, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington (“The States”), write …
An animating
value of the United States is embodied in the now-famous lines inscribed on the
Statue of Liberty: “Give me your tired, your poor / Your huddled masses
yearning to breathe free.” The United States has committed itself to providing
asylum seekers a haven from persecution, regardless of whether they are rich or
poor. Indeed, in establishing the framework for today’s asylum system in the
Refugee Act of 1980, Congress made clear it was codifying “one of the oldest
themes in America’s history—welcoming homeless refugees to our shores.”
The
regulation will deter further migration into U.S. jobs, disadvantaging
employers and state governments, the Democrats complain:
By barring
many applicants from EADs completely and indefinitely delaying others’ EADs,
the Proposed Rule imposes economic hurdles that will harm both asylum seekers
and States and serve as a deterrent to seeking asylum in the first instance.
Limiting EAD access will push asylum seekers into the underground economy,
impede their ability to take care of themselves and their families, and harm
their health and wellbeing. The States, too, will feel these consequences. The
States, for their part, welcome thousands of asylum seekers each year who
contribute greatly to their communities and economies.1 The Proposed Rule will
lower tax and spending revenue in the States and harm businesses within the
States that will have to find replacements and alternative labor. It will also
increase reliance on state-funded programs, and hinder the States’ ability to
enforce their own labor and civil rights laws.
…
The Proposed
Rule will make it much more difficult, if not impossible, for many to legally
work, costing the States millions of dollars in lost tax revenue and diminished
economic growth. Second, the resulting delays and denials of work authorization
will lead to increased healthcare costs shouldered by the States. Third, the
Proposed Rule will burden the States’ other social service providers, including
state funded non-profit service providers. Fourth, and finally, the Proposed
Rule will make it more difficult for the States to enforce their own laws,
particularly those designed to protect workers from unfair and abusive
conditions of employment.
…
Although
unauthorized workers pay taxes, tax revenue increases when immigrants can
legally work, and the States could stand to lose substantial revenue if the
Proposed Rule is implemented. Currently, undocumented immigrants residing in
the States pay approximately $7.4 billion in state and local taxes annually.
This would increase by approximately $1.4 billion if undocumented immigrants
were given legal status.
The Democrats
complain the regulation will make it difficult for migrants to hire the lawyers
needed to win asylum:
Under the
Department’s restrictive approach to work authorization, fewer asylum seekers
will have the resources to hire legal counsel to navigate them through the
complex and evolving immigration bureaucracy.4 That matters a great deal. In
2017, 90 percent of those without legal representation were denied asylum in
immigration court while only 54 percent of those with legal representation were
denied.
The
regulation will impact many migrants, the state attorneys general write:
USCIS asylum offices
within the States are considering 40 percent of the 327,984 pending affirmative
asylum applications. Based on calculations involving the most recent available
data, these offices receive an average of approximately 45,615 asylum
applications per year. The States also hosted over 10,000 or 80 percent of the
13,248 total immigration court grants of asylum in 2018.
The rule will
hurt the businesses that earn revenues from illegal migrants, they say:
The Proposed
Rule will also significantly reduce the spending power of asylum seekers,
thereby weakening the economies of the States. Curtailing work authorization
for asylum seekers or cutting others off from EADs prematurely will result in
lost wages and money that does not flow to the States’ businesses and
economies. The New American Economy estimates that immigrants exercise billions
in spending power each year, totaling over $724.8 billion in the States.
Indeed, the Department itself recognizes that up to $4.4 billion could be lost
in wages.
Businesses will
have to hire Americans instead of migrants and illegals, the attorneys general
complain:
By the
Department’s own admission, businesses will not only lose potential labor, but
also will likely have to find replacement labor because the Proposed Rule cuts
short asylum seekers’ ability to continue working, even if their asylum cases
are ongoing in federal court. Although the Department asserts that businesses
potentially could find other labor to substitute for the jobs that asylum
applicants currently hold, its own analysis belies that premise. The Department
acknowledges that with the unemployment rate at a “50-year low [. . .] it could
be possible that employers may face difficulties finding reasonable labor
substitutes.”
Migrants —
including illegals — provide a large part of the labor force hired by employers
in many states, they say:
While the
Department makes no inquiry into the “wages, occupations, industries, or
businesses that may employ such workers,” there is substantial data that
several sectors of the States’ economies disproportionately employ immigrants
and are likely to face costs while trying to find labor substitutes. In New
Jersey, for example, service providers report that many asylum seekers are
employed as home health aides, engineers, dental assistants, construction
workers, and in farming and agriculture. Immigrants fill over two-thirds of the
jobs in California’s agricultural and related sectors, almost half of those in
manufacturing, 43 percent of construction jobs, and 41 percent of those in
computer and sciences. Likewise, approximately 43 percent of employed
undocumented workers in Illinois are employed in the food services and
manufacturing industries. In New York, immigrants account for 71.4 percent of
taxi drivers and chauffeurs; 68.3 percent of workers in private households,
including maids, housekeepers, and nannies; 57.9 percent of those working as
chefs and head cooks; 57.3 percent of nursing, psychiatric, and home health
aides; and 44.7 percent of the state’s workers in traveler accommodation.
Almost 50% of U.S. employees got higher wages in 2019, up
from almost 40% in 2018.
That's useful progress - but wage growth will likely rise
faster if Congress stopped inflating the labor supply for the benefit of
business. http://bit.ly/2SyaLg7
Pay Raises and Training Expand in Donald Trump's Tight
Labor Market
EconomyImmigrationPoliticsasylumEADsIllegal
ImmigrantsMigrantsNation of
ImmigrantssalarieswagesWork Permits
No comments:
Post a Comment