Thursday, January 9, 2020

THE NIGHTMARE SCENARIO IF HILLARY CLINTON OR JOE BIDEN CONTROLLED FOREIGN POLICY. FIRST, HILLARY WOULD DEVOTE HER TIME TO SUCKING OFF BRIBES FROM MUSLIM DICTATORS AND JOE, WELL, HE WOULD LET HUNTER SUCK OFF THE BRIBES - Had Hillary been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking in even more millions than it did before. She would be happily selling access, favors and our remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY

The nightmare scenario if Hillary or Biden controlled foreign policy today

A dive into Hillary Clinton’s and Joe Biden’s past statements about Iran reveals that America is very lucky that neither occupies the White House. Looking at their past statements shows that each was an unguided, unprincipled missile who would have made a dangerous Commander-in-Chief.
The DailyWire reports that, since Iran took over the news, the hashtag “#IVotedForClinton” started trending on Twitter:
The hashtag began trending Tuesday night, as word broke that Iran had retaliated against the United States for killing Iranian Maj. Gen. Qassem Soleimani in a surgical strike inside Iraq last week by targeting U.S. military stationed at Iraqi military bases.
[snip]
“My conscience is clean. I saw the danger of trump. I begged folks especially Berniebros that if they threw away their vote, they were putting this country in mortal danger,” one user tweeted, attacking not just President Donald Trump’s supporters but also supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) who refused to cast a ballot for Clinton in 2016 amid claims the former New York Senator rigged the Democrat’s nomination process.
“We voted for intelligence. We voted for experience,” tweeted another. “We voted for respect. We voted for dignity. We voted for justice. We voted for love. #IvotedforHillaryClinton.”
The problem is that Hillary’s past behavior had nothing to do with respect, dignity, or statesmanlike behavior. Hillary, after all, was the Secretary of State who boasted after Muammar Qaddafi’s death, “We came, we saw, he died.” (This of course is the same woman who laughed when describing how she her clever legal tactics protected a child rapist from getting convicted.) When it comes to spiking the football over people’s deaths, Hillary and dignity . . . well, let's just say they're not a matched set.
Moreover, when Hillary was running for president in 2008, Hillary insisted that, if Iran were to attack American interests, she would ensure a “massive retaliation”:
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton warned Tehran on Tuesday that if she were president, the United States could “totally obliterate” Iran in retaliation for a nuclear strike against Israel.
[snip]
“That’s a terrible thing to say but those people who run Iran need to understand that because that perhaps will deter them from doing something that would be reckless, foolish and tragic,” Clinton said.
Hillary's promises are very different from Donald Trump's delicate, targeted retaliation, one that ended with an offer to help Iran give up terrorism and join the world's nations in peace and prosperity. 
Democrat frontrunner Joe Biden’s record about how he would deal with Iran is, quite possibly, even worse. In an October 2011 article that Michael Crowley wrote for The New Republic, Senator Biden, then chair of  the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, “and the Democratic Party’s de facto spokesman on the war against terrorism,” had some interesting ideas about pacifying the Middle East after 9/11:
At the Tuesday-morning meeting with committee staffers, Biden launches into a stream-of-consciousness monologue about what his committee should be doing, before he finally admits the obvious: "I'm groping here." Then he hits on an idea: America needs to show the Arab world that we're not bent on its destruction. "Seems to me this would be a good time to send, no strings attached, a check for $200 million to Iran," Biden declares. He surveys the table with raised eyebrows, a How do ya like that? look on his face.
Aside from the fact that Iran is not part of the Arab world (they're Persians in that country), the article as a whole is a devastating look at Biden’s idiocies and idiosyncrasies, all of which have gotten worse in the ensuing 19 years. It deserves close study should he become the Democrat party presidential candidate.
Americans should thank their lucky stars that the Electoral College saved them from President Clinton, Part II, and should work hard to ensure that Joe Biden never sits in the Oval Office.



Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’



"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."  ----  Patricia McCarthy


///


GRIFTER AND PHONY CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER HILLARY CLINTON’S LONG SERVICE TO AMERICA’S MOST EVIL BANKSTERS


The judge found these releases, together with the publication of Clinton’s secret speeches to Wall Street banks, in which she pledged to be their representative, were “matters of the highest public concern.” They “allowed the American electorate to look behind the curtain of one of the two major political parties in the United States during a presidential election.”

*


“Clinton also failed to mention how he and Hillary cashed in after his presidential tenure to make themselves multimillionaires, in part by taking tens of millions in speaking fees from Wall Street bankers.”

///

VIDEO:
THE FRAUDULENT CLINTON FOUNDATION EXPOSED.
PAY-TO-PLAY FROM THE FIRST DAY!


Is it a signal that she's back in the game because she's selling her president-ability to the world's global billionaire crowd and laying the groundwork for more funds?  There are all kinds of ways for foreign billionaires to get money to the U.S. without consequences, after all.  What's more, it's pretty much the biggest base of support she has, which is at least one reason why she lost the 2016 election.
*
“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service”
into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political
machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of
a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the
Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes.
*
The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”
*
"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."  ----  Patricia McCarthy - AMERICANTHINKER.com
///

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.

http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html

1.     Globalism: Google VP Kent Walker insists that despite its repeated rejection by electorates around the world, “globalization” is an “incredible force for good.”

2.     Hillary Clinton’s Democratic party: An executive nearly broke down crying because of the candidate’s loss. Not a single executive expressed anything but dismay at her defeat.

3.   Immigration: Maintaining liberal immigration in the U.S is the policy that Google’s executives discussed the most.

HILLARY CLINTON’S GLOBALIST VISION:

SURRENDER OF OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AND SUCKING IN GLOBAL BRIBES FOR THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION


Even though it has gone virtually unreported by Corporate media, Breitbart News has extensively documented the Clintons’ 
longstanding support for “open borders.” Interestingly, as the Los Angeles Times observed in 2007, the Clinton’s praise for 
globalization and open borders frequently comes when they are 
speaking before a wealthy foreign audiences and donors.


THE OBAMA – CLINTON RUSSIA CONNECTION
*
WITH THESE TRAITORS, JUST FOLLOW THE MONEY!
*
How President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton aided Russia’s quest for global nuclear dominance.
///

THE SHADY POLITICS OF HILLARY CLINTON and her PAY-TO-PLAY MAFIA
The left cared nothing about that bit of collusion. 
Hillary and her campaign aides have long been involved with Russia for reasons of personal gain.  Clinton herself got $145 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation for allowing Russia to take over twenty percent of all uranium production in the U.S. Her campaign chairman, John Podesta, is reaping the financial benefits of being on the board of a Russian company, Joule, which he did not disclose.  PATRICIA McCARTHY

Had Hillary been elected, the Clinton Foundation would be raking in even more millions than it did before.  She would be happily selling access, favors and our remaining freedoms out from under us. PATRICIA McCARTHY

No comments: