THE
NEXT MEXICAN INVASION IS AT HAND:
"Mexican president candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador called for
mass immigration to the United States, declaring it a "human right".
We will defend all the (Mexican) invaders in the American," Obrador said,
adding that immigrants "must leave their towns and find a life, job,
welfare, and free medical in the United States."
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/07/mexican-president-andres-manuel-lopez.html
"Fox’s
Tucker Carlson noted Thursday that Obrador has previously proposed granting
AMNESTY TO MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS. “America is now Mexico’s social safety net,
and that’s a very good deal for the Mexican ruling class,” Carlson added."
"Many Americans forget is that our country is located
against a socialist failed state that is promising to descend even further into
chaos – not California, the other one. And the Mexicans, having reached the
bottom of the hole they have dug for themselves, just chose to keep digging by
electing a new leftist presidente who wants to surrender to the cartels and who
thinks that Mexicans have some sort of “human right” to sneak into the U.S. and
demographically reconquer it." KURT SCHLICHTER
Billionaire Mexicans tell their poor to JUMP U.S. OPEN BORDERS and LOOT THE STUPID GRINGO… and loot they do!
Billions of dollars are sucked out of
America from Mexico’s looting!
1) Mexico
ended legal immigration 100 years ago, except for Spanish blood.
Klobuchar: Momentary Forgetfulness Does Not Reflect What I Know About Mexico
By Melanie Arter | February 20, 2020 | 11:26am EST
(Photo by MARK RALSTON/AFP via Getty Images)
(CNSNews.com) - Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) on Thursday defended herself against the accusation that she does not know enough about Mexico to be president after she couldn’t name Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador or discuss any of his policies during a Telemundo interview last week.
“Shouldn’t our next president know more about one of our largest trading partners?” Telemundo reporter Guadalupe Venegas asked at MSNBC’s Democratic presidential debate in Las Vegas, Nev.
“Shouldn’t our next president know more about one of our largest trading partners?” Telemundo reporter Guadalupe Venegas asked at MSNBC’s Democratic presidential debate in Las Vegas, Nev.
Klobuchar: Of course, of course, and I don't think that that momentary forgetfulness actually reflects what I know about Mexico and how much I care about it, and I first want to say, greetings to President Loprez Obrador. Secondly, what I meant by the game of Jeopardy Is that I think we could all come up with things, how many members are there in the Israeli Knesset? 120. Who is the president of Honduras? Hernandez.
When it comes to Mexico, I am the one person on the stage that came out first to say I was for the U.S./Mexican/Canadian trade agreement. That is going to be one of the number one duties of a president --
Venegas: Senator Klobuchar, my colleague specifically asked you if you could name the president of Mexico, and your response was no.
Klobuchar: Yes. Yes, that's right. And I said that I made an error. I think having a president that maybe is humble and is able to admit that here and there, maybe wouldn't be a bad thing.
Venegas: Mayor Buttigieg --
Klobuchar: If you would let me --
Buttigieg: I wouldn't liken this to trivia. I actually didn’t know how many members were in the Knesset, so you got me there.
Klobuchar: There you go.
Buttigieg: But you are staking your candidacy on your Washington experience. You're on the committee that oversees border security. You're on the committee that does trade. You're literally part of the committee that's overseeing these things and were not able to speak to literally the first thing about the politics of the country to our south?
Klobuchar: Are you trying to say that I'm dumb? Are you mocking me here, Pete?
Buttigieg: I'm saying you shouldn't trivialize that knowledge.
Klobuchar: I said I made an error. People sometimes forget names. I am the one that has, number one, has the experience based on passing over 100 bills --
Venegas: Thank you, senator.
Klobuchar: If I could respond, this was a pretty big allegation. He's basically saying that I don't have the experience to be president of the United States. I have passed over 100 bills as the lead Democrat since being in the U.S. Senate. I am the one, not you, that has won statewide and congressional district after congressional district, and I will say when you tried in Indiana, Pete, to run, what happened to you? You lost by over 20 points to someone who later lost to my friend Joe Donnelly. So don't tell me about experience. What unites us here is we want to win, and I think we should put a proven winner in charge of the ticket.
Buttigieg: This is a race for president. If winning the race for Senate in Minnesota translated directly to becoming president, I would have grown up under the presidency of Walter Mondale. This is different, and the reason that I think we need to talk about Washington experience is that we should ask what that experience has led to. Experience and certainly tenure is not always the same thing as judgment. If we're going to talk about votes in the Senate in Washington, let’s talk about it.
Warren: Can I just defend Senator Klobuchar for a minute? This is not right. I understand that she forgot the name. It happens. It happens to everybody on this stage. Look, you want to ask about whether or not you understand trade policy with Mexico? Have at it, and if you get it wrong, man, you ought to be held accountable for that. You want to ask about the economy, and you get it wrong, you ought to be held accountable. You want to ask about a thousand different issues and you get it wrong, you ought to be held accountable, but let's just be clear. Missing a name all by itself does not indicate that you do not understand what’s going on.
Klobuchar: You have just invoked my name again, and I would ask to you look at the interview did I directly after the forum, which we went into great detail on Latin American policy, and I want to say one thing about Mayor Pete where we just disagree. He was asked on the debate stage about the Mexican cartels, which are bad, bad criminal organizations. He said that he would be open to classifying them as terrorist organizations. I actually don't agree with that. That is a very valid debate to have. I don't think that would be good for our security coordination with Mexico, and I think you got that wrong.
Mexico: Where Is Your Shame?
At a demonstration Wednesday in
Mexico City against Arizona's law.
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Immigration: Mexico's government
gloated triumphantly after a federal judge's injunction blocked Arizona's
immigration law. But it's no victory for Mexico. In fact, Mexico's leaders
ought to be mortified.
As radical immigration activists
crowed with glee and the Obama administration claimed victory, Mexico's
government joined the applause.
Calling Judge Susan Bolton's
injunction Wednesday "a step in the right direction," Mexican Foreign
Minister Patricia Espinosa declared: "The government of Mexico would like
to express its recognition for the determination demonstrated by the federal
government of the United States and the actions of the civil organizations that
organized lawsuits against the SB 1070 law."
In reality, it ought to be ashamed.
Supposedly framed as an issue of federal power pre-empting state power, it's
hardly Mexico's business. But Mexico made a big show of saying its interest was
in protecting its nationals from the dreadful racism of Arizona that its own
citizens, curiously enough, keep fleeing to.
Espinosa said her government was busy
collecting data on civil rights violations and her department had issued an
all-out travel warning to Mexican nationals about Arizona.
That's where Mexico's hypocrisy is
just too much.
First, Mexico encourages illegal
immigration to the U.S. Oh, it says it doesn't, but it prints comic book guides
for would-be illegal immigrants and provides ID cards for illegals once they
get here. In Arizona alone, Mexico keeps five consulates busy.
That's not out of love for its
own citizens, but because Mexicans send cash back to Mexico that helps finance
the government.
Instead of selling its wasteful state-owned oil company or
getting rid of red tape to create jobs in Mexico, Mexico spends the hard
currency from remittances. It fails to look at why its citizens leave.
According to the Heritage
Foundation-Wall Street Journal 2010 Index of Economic Freedom, Mexico's big
problem is — no shock — government corruption, where it ranks below the world
average.
That's where Mexico's cartels come in.
Mexico's encouragement of illegal
immigration undercuts its valiant war against its smuggling cartels. The
cartels' prowess and firepower have made them the only ones who can smuggle
effectively across the border. U.S. law enforcers say they now control
human-smuggling on our southern border.
Feed them immigrants and they grow
more cash-rich — and right now, immigrant smuggling is about a third of the cartels'
income.
Mass graves and car bombings are
signs of criminal organizations getting bigger, and more powerful. Juarez,
which has lost 5,000 people this year, bleeds because cartels fight over not
just who gets the drug routes, but who gets the illegal-immigrant smuggling
routes, too.
Aside from the cartel mayhem in
Mexico, the bodies are piling up in the Arizona desert and U.S. Border Patrol
rescues of abandoned illegals left to die have risen.
It's not the desert's fault,
and it's certainly not Uncle Sam's fault, as activists claim. No, it's the fact
that Mexicans are encouraged to emigrate. Criminal cartels don't fear
abandoning their human cargo in the desert, as long as Mexico does nothing and
blames Uncle Sam.
Hearing Mexico's government now cheer
the Arizona ruling, which will only encourage more illegal immigration, gives
the country's regime a pretty inhuman face.
If Mexico had any decency, it would
do all it could to discourage illegal immigration and keep a respectful silence
about Arizona.
It needs U.S. support for its war on
cartels. Instead of insulting American citizens, Mexico should confront
directly the reasons why its people are so desperate to leave, and do all in
its power to destroy the cartels that are slowly killing the nation. That
includes defunding the murderous gangs by halting illegal immigration.
WHAT DOES MEXICO DO
WITH THEIR OWN ILLEGALS???
THEY DEPORT THEM ON
THE SPOT!!!
Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign
visitors and immigrants are:
1.) in the country legally;
2.) have the
means to sustain themselves economically;
3.) not destined
to be burdens on society;
4.) of economic
and social benefit to society;
5.) of good
character and have no criminal records; and
6.) contributors
to the general well-being of the nation.
The law also
ensures that:
7.) immigration
authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
8.) foreign
visitors do not violate their visa status;
9.) foreign
visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;
10.) foreign
visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;
11.) foreign
visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
GET THIS:
12.) those who aid in illegal immigration will be
sent to prison!!!!!!!!!
BORDER AGENT RESCUES
DROWNING MIGRANT INVADERS…. Mexico ships them back over the border to register
Democrat and collect their anchor baby welfare!
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/12/pelosis-open-borders-border-patrol.html
*
"The
newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador, was gleeful during the election
when he told his compadres they should all move to America,
illegally. His encouragement along with his pro-poverty policies
will set the stage for another tsunami of illegal immigration." COLIN
FLAHERTY
*
"They will destroy America
from within. The leftist billionaires
who orchestrate these plans are wealthy. Those tasked with representing us in
Congress will never be exposed to the cost of the invasion. They have nothing
but contempt for us who must endure the consequences of our communities being
intruded upon by gangs, drug dealers and human traffickers. These people have no intention of becoming
Americans; like the Democrats who welcome them, they have contempt for
us." PATRICIA McCARTHY
*
The immigration debate has been raging for years. Advocates
for open borders can be found on both sides of the political aisle and in a
wide variety of special interest groups who have come to see the immigration
system that delivers an unlimited supply of cheap and exploitable labor, an
unlimited supply of foreign tourists, and unlimited supply of foreign students
and, for the lawyers, an unlimited supply of clients. MICHAEL CUTLER
vicente fox of narcomex says “muck america!!! yOU
BELONG TO US!
bUT DOES FOX BELONG TO THE LA RAZA HEROIN CARTELS?
"Also, Rubin did not
mention the moral responsibility of the child’s father who brought her through
the desert in an apparent effort to use the catch-and-release Flores loophole to get past
border guards. The loophole was created by Judge Dolly Gee who has ordered
border officials to release migrants after 20 days if they bring a child with
them."
THE
INVASION SPONSORED BY THE DEMOCRAT PARTY
Congressional
Democrats are apparently fine with catch-and-release policies because they see
the likely electoral benefits. According to Customs and Border Protection
(CPB), of the 94,285 Central American family units apprehended last year, 99
percent of them remain in the country today. CPB also reports that 98 percent
of the 31,754 unaccompanied minors from the Northern Triangle of Central
America remain in the country. CAL THOMAS
THE NARCOMEX INVASION OF AMERICA…. By
invitation of the Democrat Party
HOW MANY HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS WILL WE LET
MEXICO SUCK OUT OF OUR OPEN BORDER?
There are many reasons
why, for the first time, the government of Mexico would agree to work
cooperatively with the United States over an extremely serious
immigration-related issue. It is likely, of course that President Trump was not
just posturing when he said he would cut off aid to Mexico and other countries
who permit the United States to be invaded by illegal aliens.
*
Under Guzman’s leadership,
the Sinaloa Cartel became the largest drug trafficking organization in the
world with influence in every major U.S. city.
*
The
allegations against Pena Nieto are not new. In 2016, Breitbart
News reported on an investigation by Mexican journalists
which revealed how Juarez Cartel operators funneled money into the
2012 presidential campaign. The investigation was carried out by Mexican
award-winning Journalist Carmen
Aristegui and
her team….The subsequent scandal became known as “Monexgate” for the cash
cards that were given out during Peña Nieto’s campaign. The allegations
against Pena Nieto went largely unreported by U.S. news outlets.
THE INVASION!
MEXICO UNDER, OVER
AND OCCUPYING AMERICA AT STAGGERING COSTS
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2019/04/mexico-in-meltdown-narco-state-pouring.html
"While other witnesses at Mr. Guzmán’s trial in Federal District Court in
Brooklyn have testified about huge payoffs from traffickers to the Mexican
police and public officials, the testimony about Mr. Peña Nieto was the most
egregious allegation yet. If true, it suggests that corruption by drug cartels
had reached into the highest level of Mexico’s political establishment."
*
The former president of
Mexico, Enrique Peña Nieto, took a $100 million bribe from Joaquín
MEXICO’S INVASION, OCCUPATION and LOOTING OF
AMERICA by INVITATION OF THE GLOBALIST LA RAZA SUPREMACY DEMOCRAT PARTY for
WIDER OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED
"Fox’s Tucker Carlson noted Thursday that
Obrador has previously proposed ranting AMNESTY TO MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS.
“America is now Mexico’s social safety net, and that’s a very good deal for the
Mexican ruling class,” Carlson added."
*
"The man likely to be the
next president of Mexico just called for mass migration to the US" RICK
MORAN
*
“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in the world,” Obrador said, adding that immigrants “must leave their towns and find a life in the United States.” RICK MORAN
“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in the world,” Obrador said, adding that immigrants “must leave their towns and find a life in the United States.” RICK MORAN
Guzmán Loera, the
infamous crime lord known as El Chapo, according to a witness at Mr. Guzman’s trial.
ALAN FEUER
“Mexican drug cartels are the “other” terrorist threat to
America. Militant Islamists have the goal of destroying the United
States. Mexican drug cartels
are now accomplishing that mission – from within, every day, in
virtually every community across this country.” JUDICIAL WATCH
"In 2016, according
to my analysis of the data, more Americans were reported killed by homicide in
Mexico than the combined total of Americans killed by homicide in every other
country abroad." MONICA SHOWALTER
Mexico cynically wades into El Paso shooting debacle, brimming
with hypocrisy
As if the El Paso mass murder couldn't be a more noxious showcase for
political bad behavior, in wades the Mexican government, launching lawsuits
against the U.S. for supposedly failing to protect its citizens, which is
something they've never bothered about before. According to NBC
News:
Mexico on Sunday threatened to take legal action against the
United States for failing to protect its citizens after this weekend's mass
shooting in the border city of El Paso.
Of the 20 people gunned down at a Walmart at the Cielo Vista Mall,
at least seven were Mexican citizens, and Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard
promised Mexico City will act.
In a statement, the Foreign Ministry called the attack in El Paso
a "terrorist
act against innocent Mexicans."
Apparently, they've seen how their individual illegals can
exploit loopholes in U.S. law to their advantage, and now that bastion of peace
and tranquility to our south would like a serving of the same. Instead of
warning Mexican potential illegals to stay out of the U.S. the way a normal
country would do, they want to muscle the U.S. legal system to their benefit,
creating a sort of right to protection in the U.S. which is something Mexicans
certainly don't have back home.
And more to the point, the Mexican state would like to blame
the U.S. for the action of the lone freak who shot up the Wal-Mart in El
Paso, same as the average Democratic politician. The fact that the freak is
going to the executioner's table is irrelevant, because what they're really
after is putting the U.S. and President Trump in particular on trial.
According to a summary of their doings from Axios:
Mexico threatened legal action Sunday against the U.S. for
failing to protect its citizens after a shooting in the border city of El Paso, Texas, killed 20 people, including 6 Mexican nationals, the New
York Times reports.
Details: Mexico's Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard said the
Mexican government was looking into extraditing the suspect to Mexico on a
terrorism charge over Saturday's shooting, per CNN. Mexico also plans legal action against the seller who provided
the weapon used in the attack, according to the NYT.
What they're saying: Ebrard said in a Twitter video, translated by NBC
News, that President Andrés
Manuel López Obrador wants to "ensure that Mexico’s indignation
translates" into "expeditious and forceful" legal action for the
country to take a role and demand that conditions are established that protect
Mexicans in the U.S.
The big picture: Many Mexicans are aware of an
anti-immigrant screed apparently posted online by the suspect just before the
shooting and they see the attack as an expression of tensions between the U.S.
and Mexico over immigration, guns and violence, often fueled by President
Trump's policies and rhetoric, the Times notes.
On those grounds, any American who's attacked, assaulted, drinks
poisoned liquor, or is killed in Mexico, should have grounds to do the
same. Failure to protect, don't you know. Such irony. Turns out more
Americans (75 of them) have been killed in Mexico than all the remaining
countries of the worldcombined. Here's what Forbes reported last year:
In 2016, according to my analysis of the data, more Americans were
reported killed by homicide in Mexico than the combined total of Americans
killed by homicide in every other country abroad.
More than 31 million Americans visited Mexico in 2016, the
National Travel & Tourism Office says, and State Department data
shows there were reports of 75 American homicide victims there. In
comparison, 49 million Americans traveled to all other foreign countries, and
69 were reported killed by homicide.
That's quite some hypocrisy they've got, given the number of
American dead bodies they've got on their record. Think they'll go along with
reciprocity? Not the Mexican government we know. The double standard stands.
But that's hardly their only hypocrisy. Here's another
logic joke from them:
They encourage their nationals to emigrate illegally
(remember the Mexican government comic
books? Apparently, they're still distributing
them) to get rid of potential discontents, and now they complain when the
place, loaded as it is with unvetted migrants they don't want around, is
somehow not safe? Any city loaded with illegals is a den of crime -- just look
at the crime in Chicago, Baltimore or any sanctuary city. Apparently,
those killings are O.K. by the Mexicans so long as they are done by other
Mexicans or maybe Central Americans. But this Dallas-area white interloper
doing the killing is something different, something sue-worthy? They've
tolerated crime for years on both sides of the border, not doing a thing so
long as the distilled remittances keep coming. Now at this late date, with this
lone freak, they are suddenly upset.
Now for a third hypocrisy: They say they want to
extradite the maggot? What the heck would that be for? Like El Chapo Guzman,
he'd be in a fine position to continue his Internet postings in a Mexican
prison because all kinds of contraband is tolerated in Mexican prisons,
particularly cell phones, and anything can be bribed for. For that matter, he'd
be in a great position to escape, much as Guzman did from Mexican prisons, more
than once. The creep, under Mexican law, would also be spared the death
penalty, something he's not going to be spared if he stays in Texas. It looks
like this extradition move is some sort of revolting bid to save him and
allow him to flourish. You can bet he'd be a happy camper if somehow he got
extradited to Mexico. Sorry amigos: The maggot is going to pay.
What we are seeing here is plain old garden variety Mexican
meddling in our internal affairs, this time rooted in some icky festering
wounded national pride, some bid from Mexico to assert itself over U.S. laws in
the wake of Trump's muscle on Mexico over the illegal migrant surge, using the
U.S. courts with their continuous anti-Trump rulings to make itself the
sovereign here. Mexico has already sent their illegals and now they want
to take over gubernatorially through the courts, which puts this act on a
continuum.
This garbage should be smacked down for the hypocrisy it is and as
fast as possible. We don't need their government ruling over here and we sure
as heck shouldn't be paying them.
No comments:
Post a Comment