Joe Biden: Moratorium on Deportations in First 100 Days
Ignorance or indifference by the press? They don't know and they don't care
https://cis.org/Arthur/Joe-Biden-Moratorium-Deportations-First-100-Days
“The figures show that
the majority of California's growth will be in the Latino population, said
Dowell Myers, a professor of urban planning and demography at USC,
adding that "68% of the growth this decade will be Latino, 75%
next and 80% after that.”
"When we hear stories about the homelessness
in California and elsewhere, why don't we hear how illegal aliens contribute to
the problem? They take jobs and affordable housing, yet instead of
discouraging illegal aliens from breaking the law, politicians encourage them
to come by lavishing free stuff on them with confiscated dollars from this
and future generations." JACK HELLNER
“Extensive research by economists
like George Borjas and analyst Steven Camarota reveals that the country’s
current mass legal immigration system burdens U.S. taxpayers and America’s
working and middle class while redistributing about $500 billion in wealth
every year to major employers and newly arrived immigrants. Similarly, research
has revealed how Americans’ wages are crushed by the country’s high immigration levels.” JOHN BINDER
Joe
Biden’s Immigration Plan: Amnesty for Illegal Aliens, Free All Border Crossers
into U.S.
11 Dec 20195,511
3:47
Former Vice President Joe Biden’s national immigration plan
includes an effort to provide amnesty to all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens
living in the United States, freeing border crossers into the country, and
restarting welfare-dependent legal immigration that would cost American
taxpayers billions.
In a plan released on Wednesday,
Biden vows to provide amnesty to every illegal alien currently living in the
U.S., as well as end nearly all of President Trump’s cost-saving reforms such
as restarting a welfare-dependent immigration pipeline, where legal immigrants
are permanently resettled in the country despite immediately needing public
assistance.
“Biden will immediately begin working with Congress to modernize
our system, with a priority on keeping families together by providing a roadmap
to citizenship for nearly 11 million undocumented immigrants,” the outline
states.
Aside from mass amnesty, the plan commits to:
- Releasing all border
crossers into the U.S. interior
- Restarting
welfare-dependent legal immigration to the U.S.
- Ending the National
Emergency Declaration at the southern border
- Ending a travel ban from
foreign counties that sponsor terrorism
- Providing amnesty to 3.5
million DACA-enrolled and DACA-eligible illegal aliens
- Providing federal student
loans and free community college to DACA illegal aliens
- Cracking down on
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents
Biden’s plan would drive up huge
costs for American taxpayers. For example, Biden’s DACA amnesty plan
would cost U.S. citizens
at least $26 billion as about one in five DACA illegal
aliens would end up on food stamps, and at least one in seven would go on
Medicaid, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
This cost would be in addition to
the billions that citizens would again be forced to pay by his restarting of
the welfare-dependent legal immigration. This year, Trump announced that his
administration would effectively end the resettlement of millions of legal
immigrants who are known to be a public charge on taxpayers.
Biden, though, said he will reverse enforcement of the “Public
Charge Rule,” writing:
Allowing immigration officials to
make an individual’s ability to receive a visa or gain permanent residency
contingent on their use of government services such as SNAP benefits or Medicaid, their household income,
and other discriminatory criteria undermines America’s character as
land of opportunity that is open and welcoming to all, not just the
wealthy. [Emphasis added]
The open borders lobby has taken issue with Biden’s
immigration agenda because it does not go far enough in ending all interior
immigration and border enforcement. Pro-mass immigration activists have
demanded, for example, that all 2020 Democrats endorse their plan to
end all deportations of illegal aliens, even those convicted of murder, child
sex crimes, and rape.
Thus far, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT)
has vowed to end all deportations,
while Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) has said she is open to ending
deportations.
Oppositely, Trump has raised
America’s working and middle-class wages by tightening the labor
market through increased immigration
enforcement. Similarly, Trump’s economic nationalist agenda has sought to decrease
overall immigration to the U.S. so foreign labor market competition is reduced
for American workers, not increased.
Study: More than 7-in-10 California Immigrant
Welfare
US Customs and Border Patrol
2:45
More than 7-in-10 households headed by immigrants in the
state of California are on taxpayer-funded welfare, a new study reveals.
The latest Census Bureau data analyzed by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) finds that
about 72 percent of households headed by noncitizens and immigrants use one or
more forms of taxpayer-funded welfare programs in California — the number one
immigrant-receiving state in the U.S.
Meanwhile, only about 35 percent of households headed by
native-born Americans use welfare in California.
All four states with the largest foreign-born populations,
including California, have extremely high use of welfare by immigrant households.
In Texas, for example, nearly 70 percent of households headed by immigrants use
taxpayer-funded welfare. Meanwhile, only about 35 percent of native-born
households in Texas are on welfare.
In New York and Florida, a majority of households headed by
immigrants and noncitizens are on welfare. Overall, about 63 percent of
immigrant households use welfare while only 35 percent of native-born
households use welfare.
President Trump’s administration is looking to soon implement a
policy that protects American taxpayers’ dollars from funding the
mass importation of welfare-dependent foreign nationals by enforcing a “public
charge” rule whereby legal immigrants would be less likely to secure a
permanent residency in the U.S. if they have used any forms of welfare in the
past, including using Obamacare, food stamps, and public housing.
The immigration controls would be a boon for American taxpayers
in the form of an annual $57.4
billion tax cut — the amount taxpayers spend every year on paying for
the welfare, crime, and schooling costs of the country’s mass importation of
1.5 million new, mostly low-skilled legal immigrants.
As Breitbart News reported, the majority of
the more than 1.5 million foreign nationals entering the country every
year use about 57
percent more food stamps than the average native-born American
household. Overall, immigrant households consume 33 percent more cash
welfare than American citizen households and 44 percent more in Medicaid
dollars. This straining of public services by a booming 44 million foreign-born
population translates to the average immigrant household costing American
taxpayers $6,234 in federal
welfare.
No comments:
Post a Comment