Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee, handed down Roger Stone’s sentence today: 40 months. That's 40 months longer than anything done to James Comey, Andrew McCabe, Hillary Clinton, James Clapper, or the other Deep State actors, but it’s significantly less than the 7-9 years that Mueller’s rabid crew sought for him. To offset the more lenient sentence, Jackson went on an anti-Trump rant.
Roger Stone is not an appealing character, but even unappealing characters can get railroaded. The broad outlines of what happened are that James Comey inveigled Trump into pointing Robert Mueller as an “independent prosecutor” charged with investigating whether Trump conspired with Russia to win the election; that Mueller and his attack dogs knew within days of beginning the investigation that the foundational accusations were lies; that the Mueller team nevertheless dragged the investigation out for 2 years and $35 million, all the while trying to find something against Trump; and that, along the way, the Mueller team set out to ruin anyone close to Trump, tangling them up with process crimes and threats of personal destruction.
Roger Stone was one of those caught in the tainted Mueller net. He told lies that are the normal currency in Washington, D.C. People such as Comey, Clinton (both Clintons, actually), McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, and others told similar lies but nevertheless were able to walk away with TV gigs and book deals. He also fulminated at another witness, issuing threats and asking him to lie, demands and threats so impotent that the witness considered them laughable.
When the FBI arrested Stone, instead of talking to Stone’s lawyer to arrange for him to turn himself in, the FBI did a pre-dawn SWAT raid, with the CNN camera conveniently located nearby. Then, Mueller’s attorneys put Stone in front of Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee.
Interestingly enough, before Trump’s presidency, Berman was a slightly left-leaning, but otherwise reasonably even-handed judge. Sure, she ruled that the Roman Catholic Diocese of Washington had to provide contraceptives under Obamacare, but she also ruled against the National Labor Relations Board, the Obama-era EPA, and U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr., who got a 30-month sentence, in his case for misusing campaign funds.
When Trump came into office, though, Jackson became a resistance judge. She dismissed a wrongful death complaint against Hillary brought by parents of two of the men who died in Benghazi. She placed Paul Manafort in solitary confinement, muzzled Manafort’s and Rick Gates’ attorneys, and allowed special counsel to walk away from a plea deal. She’s been equally draconian with Roger Stone, placing gag orders on him and his attorneys and insisting on sentencing him before conducting a hearing about the jury foreperson who lied about the fact that she was a rabid Trump and Stone hater.
It should be no surprise, then, that Jackson used the sentencing hearing to go off on a rant about Trump:
[S]he turned his sentencing hearing into a stunning rebuke not just of Stone but of the president himself, saying the prosecution was not brought by 'political enemies,' and that there was no 'anti-Trump cabal' at the hear of the case.'He was not prosecuted, as some have complained, for standing up for the president, he was prosecuted for covering up for the president,' she said.'There was nothing unfair, phony or disgraceful about the investigation or the prosecution.'
Democrats, of course, pointed to Trump’s earlier tweets against Jackson to justify her partisan attack:
Is this the Judge that put Paul Manafort in SOLITARY CONFINEMENT, something that not even mobster Al Capone had to endure? How did she treat Crooked Hillary Clinton? Just asking! twitter.com/KatiePhang/sta…
What both Jackson and the Democrats fail to understand is that Trump is a political figure who does not need to appear impartial. Jackson, however, is a judge, and the entire basis of trust in the judicial system is the belief that judges are impartial. Jackson exploded that myth.
Trump-the-politician, meanwhile, gets the final word as to this political witch hunt:
“They say Roger Stone lied to Congress.” @CNN OH, I see, but so did Comey (and he also leaked classified information, for which almost everyone, other than Crooked Hillary Clinton, goes to jail for a long time), and so did Andy McCabe, who also lied to the FBI! FAIRNESS?
A VERY STABLE GENIUS
“This taut and terrifying
book is among the most closely observed accounts of Donald J. Trump’s shambolic
tenure in office to date.” - Dwight Garner, The
New York Times
Read
an excerpt:
‘You’re a bunch of dopes and babies’: Inside Trump’s stunning tirade against generals
‘You’re a bunch of dopes and babies’: Inside Trump’s stunning tirade against generals
THE BOOK
Washington
Post national investigative reporter Carol Leonnig
and White House bureau chief Philip Rucker, both Pulitzer Prize winners,
provide the definitive insider narrative of Donald Trump’s unique presidency
with shocking new reporting and insight into its implications.
“I
alone can fix it.” So went Donald J. Trump’s march to the presidency on July
21, 2016, when he accepted the Republican presidential nomination in Cleveland,
promising to restore what he described as a fallen nation. Yet over the
subsequent years, as he has undertaken the actual work of the commander in
chief, it has been hard to see beyond the daily chaos of scandal,
investigation, and constant bluster. It would be all too easy to mistake
Trump’s first term for one of pure and uninhibited chaos, but there were
patterns to his behavior and that of his associates. The universal value of the
Trump administration is loyalty - not to the country, but to the president
himself - and Trump’s North Star has been the perpetuation of his own power,
even when it meant imperiling our shaky and mistrustful democracy.
Leonnig
and Rucker, with deep and unmatched sources throughout Washington, D.C., tell
of rages and frenzies but also moments of courage and perseverance. Relying on
scores of exclusive new interviews with some of the most senior members of the
Trump administration and other firsthand witnesses, the authors reveal the
forty-fifth president up close, taking readers inside Robert Mueller’s Russia
investigation as well as the president’s own haphazard but ultimately
successful legal defense. Here for the first time certain officials who have
felt honor-bound not to publicly criticize a sitting president or to divulge
what they witnessed in a position of trust tell the truth for the benefit of
history.
This
peerless and gripping narrative reveals President Trump at his most unvarnished
and exposes how decision making in his administration has been driven by a
reflexive logic of self-preservation and self-aggrandizement - but a logic
nonetheless. This is the story of how an unparalleled president has scrambled
to survive and tested the strength of America’s democracy and its common heart
as a nation.
The Lessons of Theodore Roosevelt
To get out of our Second Gilded Age, look no
further than how we got out of the first one.
September 6, 2019
We’ve been rocked by scandals over the past year involving the
nation’s most wealthy and powerful. We’ve learned that a twisted
multimillionaire allegedly procured and raped girls in his Manhattan mansion
and on his private Caribbean Island; entitled celebrities and corporate
plutocrats paid millions of dollars in bribes to get their kids into elite
universities; pillars of the Hollywood and media establishments have used their
stature to sexually prey upon underlings; and, yes, our president was caught
lying about possibly violating campaign finance laws with hush money payoffs to
a porn star and Playboy bunny.
This moral corruption
is accompanied by the regressive government policies of a scandal-stained
administration. President Donald Trump is rolling back programs that protect
consumers, voting rights, the environment, and competitive commerce faster than
Congress can issue subpoenas. His cabinet includes 17 millionaires, two
centimillionaires, and one billionaire with a combined worth of $3.2
billion, according to Forbes. He
presides over the most corrupt administration in American history, one marked
by nepotism and self-dealing. His so-called “A Team” of senior officials has
undergone a record 75 percent turnover since he took
office—most of whom resigned under pressure, often caught up in
scandal.
Commerce Secretary
Wilbur Ross, whose net worth is estimated at $600 million,
reflected the arrogance and empathy deficit that typifies the Trump White House
during last winter’s record-long government shutdown. He suggested that federal
workers just take out loans until they got paid.
But nobody tops the
swamp king, Trump himself. Forget the sleaze, forget the obstruction of
justice, forget the constant dissing of Congress. His defying the
Constitution’s emoluments clause alone would, in a normally functioning
American democracy, make him the subject of impeachment. Instead, he flouts the
rules as if they don’t apply to him. If he gets his way and hosts next year’s
G-7 summit at Mar-a-Lago, we may as well send the Constitution to the shredder.
And yet, as more recent controversies have shown us, including the Varsity
Blues college admissions scandal and Jeffery Epstein’s sex trafficking racket,
this kind of indifference to moral values is not confined to government
grandees.
So, what gives? Is
America drowning in a marsh of unchecked corruption and entitlement brought on
by latter-day Louis XVI’s and Marie Antoinettes? Are the uber-wealthy out of
control? There’s something rotten in America and, if we don’t fix it soon, we
invite a new wave of national decline and social disintegration.
The good news is that
we have faced similar challenges before. Some prescriptions from a previous era
may provide a lodestar for a future Democratic president to steer the country
in the right direction. As Mark Twain, who coined the term “the Gilded Age,” once
said, “The external glitter of wealth conceals a corrupt political core that
reflects the growing gap between the very few rich and the very many poor.” He
was talking about the original Gilded Age, but that diagnosis could just as
easily apply to our current American condition.
The first Gilded Age
was marked by rapid economic growth, massive immigration, political corruption,
and a high concentration of wealth in which the richest one percent owned 51 percent of
property, while the bottom 44 percent had a mere one percent. The oligarchs at
the top were popularly known as “robber barons.”
Theodore Roosevelt, who
was president at the time, understood that economic inequality itself becomes a
driver of a dysfunctional political system that benefits the wealthy but few
others. As he once famously warned, “There can be no real
political democracy unless there is something approaching economic democracy.”
His response to the
inequities of his times, which came to define the Progressive Era, have much to
teach us now about how to sensibly tackle economic inequality. It’s worthwhile
to closely examine the Rooseveltian playbook. For instance, his “Square Deal”
made bold changes in the American workplace, government regulation of industry,
and consumer protection. These reforms included mandating safer conditions for
miners and eliminating the spoils system in federal hiring; bringing forty-four
antitrust suits against big business, resulting in the breakup of the largest
railroad monopoly, and regulation of the nation’s largest oil company; and
passing the Meat Inspection Act and Pure Food and Drug Act, which created the
FDA. He prosecuted more than twice
as many antitrust suits against monopolistic businesses than his three
predecessors combined, curbing the robber barons’ power. And he relentlessly
cleaned up corruption in the federal government. One-hundred-forty-six
indictments were brought against a bribery ring involving public timberlands,
culminating in the conviction and imprisonment of a U.S. senator, and
forty-four Postal Department employees were charged with fraud and bribery.
Now, we are in a Second
Gilded Age, facing many of the same problems, and, in some ways, to an even
greater degree. The gap between the rich and everyone else is even greater than
it was during the late 19th Century, when the richest two percent of Americans
owned more than a third of the nation’s wealth. Today, the top one percent owns
almost 40 percent of the nation’s wealth, or more than the bottom 90 percent
combined, according to the
nonpartisan National Bureau of Economic Research. The first Gilded Age saw the
rise of hyper-rich dynastic families, such as the Rockefellers, Mellons,
Carnegies, and DuPonts. Today, three individuals—Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, and
Warren Buffett—own more wealth than the bottom half of the country combined.
And three families—the Waltons, the Kochs, and the Mars—have enjoyed a nearly
6,000 percent rise in wealth since Ronald Reagan took the oath as president,
while median U.S. household wealth over the same period has declined by three percent.
The consequences of
this wealth gap are dire. Steve Brill explains in his book Tailspin that,
by manipulating the tax and legal systems to their benefit, America’s most
educated elite, the so-called meritocracy, have built a moat that excludes the
working poor, limiting their upward mobility and increasing their sense of
alienation, which then gives rise to the populist streak that allowed
politicians like Trump to captivate enough of the American electorate.
Similarly, psychologist
Dacher Keltner’s research shows that power in and of itself is a corrupting
force. As he documents in The
Power Paradox, powerful people lie more, drive more aggressively, are more
likely to cheat on their spouses, act abusively toward subordinates, and even
take candy from children. Too often, they simply do not respect the rules.
For example, in
monitoring an urban traffic intersection, Keltner found that drivers of the
least expensive vehicles virtually always yielded to
pedestrians, whereas drivers of luxury cars yielded only about half of the
time. He cites surveys covering 27
countries that show that rich people are more likely to admit that it’s
acceptable to engage in unethical behavior, such as accepting bribes or
cheating on taxes.“The experience of power might be thought of as having
someone open up your skull and take out that part of your brain so critical to
empathy and socially appropriate behavior,” says Keltner.
That’s why we need to
reform our political system if we are to survive the rampant amorality and
lawlessness of the Second Gilded Age. Simply put, so very few should not wield
so much sway over so many.
One of the first
priorities of an incoming administration should be to narrow the wealth and
income gap. French economist Thomas Picketty favors a progressive annual wealth
tax of up to two percent, along with a progressive income tax as high as 80
percent on the biggest earners to reduce inequality and avoid reverting to “patrimonial capitalism” in which inherited
wealth controls much of the economy and could lead essentially to oligarchy.
The leading 2020
Democratic candidates favor raising taxes, as well. Elizabeth Warren has
proposed something commensurate to Picketty’s two percent wealth tax for those
worth more than $50 million, and a three percent annual tax on individuals with
a net worth higher than $1 billion. She has also proposed closing corporate tax
loopholes. Joe Biden wants to restore the top individual income tax rate to a
pre-Trump 39.6 percent and raise capital gains taxes. Bernie Sanders has
proposed an estate tax on the wealth of the top 0.2 percent of Americans.
Following Theodore
Roosevelt’s example, we need to aggressively root out the tangle of corruption
brought on by Trump and his minions. This has already begun with multiple and
expanding investigations led by House Democrats into the metastasizing
malfeasance within the Trump administration. Trump’s successor, however, should
work with Congress to appoint a bipartisan anti-corruption task force to
oversee prosecutions and draw up reform legislation to prevent future abuses.
“Of all forms of tyranny, the least attractive and the most
vulgar is the tyranny of mere wealth, the tyranny of a plutocracy,” Roosevelt
once warned. The free market has made America the great success it is today.
But history has shown that unconstrained capitalism and a growing wealth gap
leads to an unhealthy concentration of wealth in the hands of a few. When the
gap between the haves and the have-nots goes unchecked, populism takes hold,
leading to the election of dangerous demagogues like Trump, and the disastrous
politics they bring with them. It is not too late to reverse course. But first,
we need to re-learn the lessons from our first Gilded Age if we are going to
get out of the current one.
“Our entire crony capitalist system, Democrat and
Republican alike, has become a kleptocracy approaching par with
third-world hell-holes. This is the way a great country is raided by
its elite.” ---- Karen McQuillan AMERICAN THINKER.com
Peter Schweizer, author of “Secret Empires: How the American Political Class
Hides Corruption and Enriches Family and Friends,”
#1 New York Times Bestseller!
Peter Schweizer
has been fighting corruption―and winning―for years. In Throw Them All Out, he
exposed insider trading by members of Congress, leading to the passage of the
STOCK Act. In Extortion,
he uncovered how politicians use mafia-like tactics to enrich themselves. And
in Clinton Cash,
he revealed the Clintons’ massive money machine and sparked an FBI
investigation.
Now he explains
how a new corruption has taken hold, involving larger sums of money than ever
before. Stuffing tens of thousands of dollars into a freezer has morphed into
multibillion-dollar equity deals done in the dark corners of the world.
An American bank
opening in China would be prohibited by US law from hiring a slew of family
members of top Chinese politicians. However, a Chinese bank opening in America
can hire anyone it wants. It can even invite the friends and families of
American politicians to invest in can’t-lose deals.
President Donald
Trump’s children have made front pages across the world for their dicey
transactions. However, the media has barely looked into questionable deals made
by those close to Barack Obama, Joe Biden, John Kerry, Mitch McConnell, and
lesser-known politicians who have been in the game longer.
In many parts of
the world, the children of powerful political figures go into business and
profit handsomely, not necessarily because they are good at it, but because
people want to curry favor with their influential parents. This is a relatively
new phenomenon in the United States. But for relatives of some prominent
political families, we may already be talking about hundreds of millions of
dollars.
Deeply researched and packed with shocking revelations, Secret Empires identifies
public servants who cannot be trusted and provides a path toward a more
accountable government.
Coulter: All Hail President Javanka!
ANN COULTER
10 Apr 2019111
2:52
While other
reporters waste their time examining Donald Trump’s public statements, interviewing
his high school classmates and poring over legal filings, investigative
reporter Vicky Ward has produced the definitive book on our current president.
For example, did you know our president got breast implants in
high school (Ivanka claimed she was just “curvy”), bought his way into Harvard
(Jared is even dumber than you thought), and together have no books in their
New York apartment? (Some dispute that there are no books,
citing “a few art books” or “decorator-curated books.”)
Ward’s recently released blockbuster, Kushner, Inc.: Greed. Ambition. Corruption. The Extraordinary Story of Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump, tells you all this and more about our actual commander in chief: President Javanka.
On the bright side, Jared has stopped rolling his eyes so much about his father-in-law now that Trump is president, er, “president.” Until Trump’s nomination was a virtual lock, Jared was back in New York pretending not to be related to him.
Only after Trump had racked up a slew of primary wins did a lightbulb go on in Jared’s head: Hey! This presidential campaign could be great for business! According to a close associate, Jared viewed the campaign as a terrific “networking opportunity.”
In short order, Jared moved himself in, and moved campaign manager Corey Lewandowski out.
Ward’s recently released blockbuster, Kushner, Inc.: Greed. Ambition. Corruption. The Extraordinary Story of Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump, tells you all this and more about our actual commander in chief: President Javanka.
On the bright side, Jared has stopped rolling his eyes so much about his father-in-law now that Trump is president, er, “president.” Until Trump’s nomination was a virtual lock, Jared was back in New York pretending not to be related to him.
Only after Trump had racked up a slew of primary wins did a lightbulb go on in Jared’s head: Hey! This presidential campaign could be great for business! According to a close associate, Jared viewed the campaign as a terrific “networking opportunity.”
In short order, Jared moved himself in, and moved campaign manager Corey Lewandowski out.
Trump’s loyal campaign manager had been with
him through the “Mexican rapists” speech, Macy’s dumping Trump’s ties, the
“McCain isn’t a war hero” controversy, the Muslim ban, the “hand size”
embarrassment, and on and on and on. But when all was said and done and Trump
was still cruising to victory, Jared and Ivanka walked in and delivered an
ultimatum to Trump: “It’s Corey or us.”
Jared would later shyly cop to being “[The Man Who] Won Trump the White House,” as a Forbes magazine cover story put it.
And who understood the beating heart of the Trump voter like Jared and Ivanka? With Javanka in charge, the campaign schedule was soon bristling with such items as “women’s empowerment week,” “education week” and “entrepreneur week.”
In no time, Trump was 16 points down and sinking fast. Steve Bannon was brought in, whereupon he promptly threw out all the Working Women’s Intersectional Global Warming weeks and got back to Trump’s issues.
Jared assured Bannon that the campaign had $25 million on hand. That’s when Bannon had to explain “debits” to Kushner. The campaign had $25 million — provided you didn’t count all the unpaid expenses. When those were included, it turned out the campaign was in debt.
As the SAT board had discovered, math wasn’t Jared’s strong suit.
Although it has been well reported that Jared’s Harvard admission was purchased for him by his father, Ward produces a shocking new detail. Of the five tracks at Jared’s high school, he wasn’t at the bottom of track one, perhaps suitable for a lesser Ivy League with solid SAT scores. He wasn’t even in track two. Jared was in track three. But now he has co-opted the Make America Great Again movement for his own personal advancement. I guess that makes him smarter than Trump.
Apart from staging photo-ops, including her “princess moment” at the inaugural ball (her words), Ivanka’s first order of business upon winning the presidency was assigning White House office space. Her map showed a big office for her, a big office for Jared — and also a nice corner office, which was designated “Trump family office.”
Transition officials, Ward reports, “were surprised that the first lady did not appear to have an office. So, too, was Melania Trump, who quickly put an end to Ivanka’s scheming.”
Jared’s BFF, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), and the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, Muhammad bin Zayed (MBZ), refer to Jared as “the clown prince.” Bone-cutter MBS assured those around him that he had Jared “in my pocket.”
MBS and MBZ derided Jared’s Middle East peace plan as infantile, while using him to achieve their objective: war with Qatar. According to an American businessman’s leaked emails, their attitude was, “Nobody would even waste a cup of coffee on him if it wasn’t for who he is married to.”
As one former top White House official explained: “Jared never understands the details of anything. He’s just impressed by names.”
Following meetings at the White House and also with the Kushners over their 666 Fifth Avenue property, former Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim reported back to the emir that “the people atop the new administration were heavily motivated by personal financial interest.”
After Ivanka’s speech introducing her father at the Republican National Convention — rivaled only by Billy Carter’s introduction of his brother, Jimmy! — she tweeted from her personal account: “Shop Ivanka’s look from her #RNC speech.”
After the Trump family was interviewed on CBS’s “60 Minutes,” Ivanka’s company emailed out a “style alert” advertising the $10,800 diamond bracelet she’d worn on the show — “available from Ivanka Trump Fine Jewelry.”
Ivanka has managed to win a slew of trademarks in China since her father became the Figurehead President, with several approvals being fast-tracked at about the same time Trump was hosting Chinese President Xi Jinping at Mar-a-Lago.
Instead of “Make America Great Again,” the motto of the Trump presidency is, as one of Trump’s legal spokesmen put it: “The advance team for Jared and Ivanka.”
This is not what anyone voted for.
Jared would later shyly cop to being “[The Man Who] Won Trump the White House,” as a Forbes magazine cover story put it.
And who understood the beating heart of the Trump voter like Jared and Ivanka? With Javanka in charge, the campaign schedule was soon bristling with such items as “women’s empowerment week,” “education week” and “entrepreneur week.”
In no time, Trump was 16 points down and sinking fast. Steve Bannon was brought in, whereupon he promptly threw out all the Working Women’s Intersectional Global Warming weeks and got back to Trump’s issues.
Jared assured Bannon that the campaign had $25 million on hand. That’s when Bannon had to explain “debits” to Kushner. The campaign had $25 million — provided you didn’t count all the unpaid expenses. When those were included, it turned out the campaign was in debt.
As the SAT board had discovered, math wasn’t Jared’s strong suit.
Although it has been well reported that Jared’s Harvard admission was purchased for him by his father, Ward produces a shocking new detail. Of the five tracks at Jared’s high school, he wasn’t at the bottom of track one, perhaps suitable for a lesser Ivy League with solid SAT scores. He wasn’t even in track two. Jared was in track three. But now he has co-opted the Make America Great Again movement for his own personal advancement. I guess that makes him smarter than Trump.
Apart from staging photo-ops, including her “princess moment” at the inaugural ball (her words), Ivanka’s first order of business upon winning the presidency was assigning White House office space. Her map showed a big office for her, a big office for Jared — and also a nice corner office, which was designated “Trump family office.”
Transition officials, Ward reports, “were surprised that the first lady did not appear to have an office. So, too, was Melania Trump, who quickly put an end to Ivanka’s scheming.”
Jared’s BFF, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), and the crown prince of Abu Dhabi, Muhammad bin Zayed (MBZ), refer to Jared as “the clown prince.” Bone-cutter MBS assured those around him that he had Jared “in my pocket.”
MBS and MBZ derided Jared’s Middle East peace plan as infantile, while using him to achieve their objective: war with Qatar. According to an American businessman’s leaked emails, their attitude was, “Nobody would even waste a cup of coffee on him if it wasn’t for who he is married to.”
As one former top White House official explained: “Jared never understands the details of anything. He’s just impressed by names.”
Following meetings at the White House and also with the Kushners over their 666 Fifth Avenue property, former Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim reported back to the emir that “the people atop the new administration were heavily motivated by personal financial interest.”
After Ivanka’s speech introducing her father at the Republican National Convention — rivaled only by Billy Carter’s introduction of his brother, Jimmy! — she tweeted from her personal account: “Shop Ivanka’s look from her #RNC speech.”
After the Trump family was interviewed on CBS’s “60 Minutes,” Ivanka’s company emailed out a “style alert” advertising the $10,800 diamond bracelet she’d worn on the show — “available from Ivanka Trump Fine Jewelry.”
Ivanka has managed to win a slew of trademarks in China since her father became the Figurehead President, with several approvals being fast-tracked at about the same time Trump was hosting Chinese President Xi Jinping at Mar-a-Lago.
Instead of “Make America Great Again,” the motto of the Trump presidency is, as one of Trump’s legal spokesmen put it: “The advance team for Jared and Ivanka.”
This is not what anyone voted for.
One
cautionary example is President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, whose ticket
into Harvard, according to the 2006 book The Price of Admission:
How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way into Elite Colleges, was his
father’s $2.5 million dollar gift to the university. Jared got his Harvard
degree, but he has been the butt of social-media taunts precisely because his
daddy had to pay a fortune to get the school to admit him. The cost of a
brag-worthy degree? Millions. The cost of the right- and left-brain stuff?
Priceless.
No comments:
Post a Comment