"The newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador, was gleeful during the election when he told his compadres they should all move to America, illegally. His encouragement along with his pro-poverty policies will set the stage for another tsunami of illegal immigration." COLIN FLAHERTY
PELOSI - FEINSTEIN'S REAL MEXIFORNIA
"California’s public education system, once the envy of the world, now ranks 49th in the nation." ROBERT J. CRISTANO, Ph.D
Migrant enclaves already are at the top of the U.S. lists for bad places to live - 10 of the 50 worst places in America to live according to this list are in California, and all of them are famous for their illegal populations. MONICA SHOWALTER
Migrant enclaves already are at the top of the U.S. lists for bad places to live - 10 of the 50 worst places in America to live according to this list are in California, and all of them are famous for their illegal populations. MONICA SHOWALTER
California Appoints Illegal Alien to State Office
California has its first “unprotected” illegal alien in state office, after Senate President pro Tem Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) appointed Lizbeth Mateo to the California Student Opportunity and Access Program Project Grant Advisory Committee.
LIZBETH MATEO IS AN ILLEGAL. SHE IS A
PRACTICING LAWYER IN CALIFORNIA WHERE BEING UNLAWFULLY IN THE STATE DOES NOT
PREVENT YOU FROM BEING AN 'OFFICER OF THE COURT' LAWYER!
HERE SHE WAVES HER MEX FLAG ALONG WITH THE
REST OF HER PACK OF ILLEGALS.
We can even hear it today from Mexican
nationals and their descendants in the U.S. who glorify La Raza at the expense
of their adopted country.
THE REALITY OF THE INVASION:
One in every eleven persons born in Mexico has
gone to the U.S. The National Review reported that in 2014 $1.87 billion was
spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds of
billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr…… for the AMERICAN
THINKER.COM
After all, for Mexico,
illegal immigration into America is a great gig, because it acts as a safety
valve and a source of funds. If they didn't have unlimited access to
America (that is, unlimited by such constraints as visas and immigration
policies), Mexican citizens who have been burdened by decades of corruption and
mismanagement would have no option but to suffer and then, finally, to rise up
in revolution. For decades now, from the government's point of view,
it's been better to give unhappy citizens a pamphlet with advice about crossing
the border safely (albeit illegally) and then sit back and wait for the
remittances ($26.1 billion in 2017) that help keep the Mexican government afloat. ANDREA
WIDBURG
California has its first “unprotected” illegal alien in state office, after Senate President pro Tem Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) appointed Lizbeth Mateo to the California Student Opportunity and Access Program Project Grant Advisory Committee.
Exclusive–Eric Eggers: Democrat Plan Could Mail Ballots to 24M Ineligible Voters
3:13
Government Accountability Insititute (GAI) research director Eric Eggers, author of Fraud: How the Left Plans to Steal the Next Election, says the Democrats’ plan for nationwide mail-in voting would send ballots to 24 million inaccurate and flawed voter registrations.
In an exclusive interview with SiriusXM Patriot’s Breitbart News Tonight, Eggers said nationwide mail-in voting would be wide open to fraud and abuse.
LISTEN:
“The concern I have if we’re trying to mandate national mail-in elections — which by the way was part of the language that Nancy Pelosi and House Democrats inserted in the first version of the most recent stimulus package — would be that we have such massive problems with voter rolls in this country,” Eggers said. “So, now are we going to be mailing ballots to people that authentically don’t exist and or are ineligible voters?”
A 2012 study by Pew Research Center revealed that there are 24 million ineligible or inaccurate voter registrations on state voter rolls. This means 1-in-8 voter registrations are either no longer valid or invalid.
Eggers said mail-in voting ensures voters associated with those flawed voter registrations would get the chance to vote in the 2020 presidential election.
“If you have national mail-in ballots where the supervisor of elections are mailing ballots to everybody on the voter rolls and we know per Pew [Research] Center statistics that we’ve got at least 24 million flawed or inaccurate voter registrations in this country,” Eggers said. “That’s 24 million ballots that are potentially going to people with the wrong address or to people that are dead or to people that have double registered.”
Similarly, nationwide mail-in voting would almost certainly be tied to federal legalization of ballot harvesting, where political operatives are allowed to collect and deliver an endless number of absentee ballots from voters.
“You’ve got these paid political machines whose job it is to manipulate or to capitalize on those errors … the other problem I’d have is another part that was mandated in the Democrat-version of the stimulus bill which would be the legalization of … national ballot harvesting,” Eggers said.
“Democrats are so concerned about the necessity of social distancing but by legalizing ballot harvesting, you’re literally sending in many cases young potentially asymptomatic carriers of the [coronavirus] to the homes of these vulnerable populations including the elderly and the infirm who we all know are more susceptible to the virus,” Eggers continued.
As Breitbart News reported, the George Soros-funded Brennan Center for Justice at the New York University School of Law is spearheading the nationwide mail-in voting initiative.
Today, there are nearly 250 counties across the United States with more registered voters on the voter rolls than eligible citizen voters. There are also nearly three million individuals who are registered to vote in more than one state. In Illinois, alone, close to 580 noncitizen voters were improperly registered to vote in the 2018 election.
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. Follow him on Twitter at @JxhnBinder.
TRANSFORMED: 1 in 10 Voters are Immigrants
February 27, 2020
Daniel
Greenfield
But there's a huge difference
between a reasonable level of immigration, in keeping with the nation's history
and traditions, and a transformative flood that washes everything away. What we've had is effectively open borders migration at a level
most people don't understand and can't even comprehend. That helps explain the
extreme radicalism that has overtaken the country.
When the population
increasingly has little connection to the country's history and traditions, and
little investment in it, the national fabric breaks down, politics becomes
tribal, and all bets are off.
More than 23 million U.S.
immigrants will be eligible to vote in the 2020 presidential election, making
up roughly 10% of the nation’s overall electorate – both record highs,
according to Pew Research Center estimates based on Census Bureau
data.
The number of immigrant
eligible voters has increased steadily over the past 20 years, up 93% since
2000. By comparison, the U.S.-born eligible voter population grew more slowly
(by 18%) over the same period, from 181 million in 2000 to 215 million in
2020.
Just as in the UK, this was
part of a deliberate strategy to transform the country and open the Overton
window.
Most immigrant eligible voters
are either Hispanic or Asian, though they hail from countries across the globe.
Immigrants from Mexico make up the single largest group, at 16% of foreign-born
voters.
And thus knowing the name of
the current El Presidente becomes a major theme of the Democrat race.
At 7.5 million, Hispanics
account for 34% of all immigrant eligible voters in 2018, slightly up since
2000. The 6.9 million Asian immigrant eligible voters make up 31% of the
foreign-born electorate, also slightly up since 2000. White immigrant
eligible voters (4.8 million) are the third largest racial and ethnic group,
making up 22% of the immigrant electorate.
Keep in mind that a lot of the
"white" immigrants might actually be Arab Muslims.
Among Hispanic eligible voters
in 2016, about half (53%) of immigrants voted, compared with 46% of the U.S.
born, a pattern that has persisted since 2000. Among Asian eligible voters in
2016, 52% of immigrants voted, compared with 45% of the U.S. born.
In other words, it's a matter
of time until Texas goes the way of California. That's
the real reason, and not some of the current obsessions of the conservative
movement, that the 2016 election was so urgent. If we don't change this, all
the other stuff that makes for great clickbait and talk radio fare really won't
matter.
Out of California’s 25.9
million eligible voters, 21% (5.5 million) are foreign born, the highest share
of any state through Super Tuesday and in the nation.
This will end up being America.
Period.
And no, the South won't hold
either.
Since 2000, the states with the
fastest growing immigrant eligible voter populations have been Georgia,
Minnesota and North Carolina. All three have seen their numbers of immigrant
eligible voters nearly triple between 2000 and 2018. Georgia increased by 193%
during this time, the nation’s fastest growth.
Notice how few GOP governors
were willing to take a stand against refugee resettlement. This should have
been the dominant outrage issue for conservatives. Instead, few even know that
this happened. But everyone knows the latest conspiracy theories out of
Washington D.C. handfed by political operatives to social media stars and
bloggers.
This
is how we lose America.
Hans
von Spakovsky: DOJ Should Sue States Registering Non-Citizens to Vote
Hans von Spakovsky,
manager of the Heritage Foundation’s Election Law Reform Initiative and a
senior legal fellow of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies, said
Assistant Attorney General Eric Dreiband should sue states illegally
registering non-citizens to vote. He offered his remarks in an interview on
Friday’s edition of SiriusXM’s Breitbart News
Tonight with host Rebecca Mansour and special
guest host Rick Manning.
Left-wing and Democrat advocacy for abolition of the electoral
college is part of a broader plan that includes registration of non-citizens —
including illegal aliens — to vote, explained von Spakovsky.
Mansour noted New York Democrats’
plan to automatically register to vote all
residents applying for driver’s licenses — which including non-citizens and
illegal aliens — unless they “opt-out.”
“This is part and parcel of that whole system-wide movement to
make sure that people who are not citizens are registering [to vote] and not
getting caught or prosecuted for it, and [then] switching [presidential
elections] a national popular vote system so that all those votes will help win
elections.”
LISTEN:
Von Spakovsky added, “Every single U.S. attorney around the
country ought to be investigating and prosecuting … aliens who are
registering and voting. They’re doing it all over the country. So far, only two
U.S. attorneys — one in North Carolina [and] one in Texas — have brought any
kind of cases like that. [U.S. attorneys in] the rest of the states … are
ignoring these cases and not doing anything about it.”
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) can help improve the
accuracy of states’ voter rolls, explained von Spakosvky, by cross-referencing
state databases with its own records.
“[DHS} ought to be going through its records and trying to
compare its database with state voter registration lists across the country to
help the states find, again, non-citizens who are illegally registered to vote.
And that’s not really happening, either, that I’m aware of.”
Von Spakosvky advised, “What [Eric Dreiband] can do is use the
Motor Voter law — that National Voter Registration Act — to sue states that
aren’t properly cleaning up their voter rolls and maintaining the accuracy of
their voter rolls those cases they ought to be filing them because there are
plenty of states that aren’t doing what they’re supposed to be doing under the
law.”
Breitbart News Tonight broadcasts live on SiriusXM Patriot
channel 125 weeknights from 9:00 p.m. to midnight Eastern or 6:00 p.m. to 9:00
p.m. Pacific.
California’s Future: Population
By Hans
Johnson and Marisol Cuellar Mejia
Public
Policy Institute of California, January 2020
Voting integrity group
finds millions of inactive registrations
One of the standard jokes about Chicago
politics is that a lot of people who voted Republican during their lives start
voting Democrat after their deaths. Contrary to Democrats’ obsession with voter
suppression, the truth is that voter
fraud is real and it is, or should be,
a serious concern. Thanks to Judicial Watch, we’re learning that
currently there
are at least 2.5 million inactive registrations up for grabs around America:
Judicial
Watch announced today it is continuing its efforts to force states and counties
across the nation to comply with the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), by sending notice-of-violation
letters to 19 large counties in
five states that it intends to sue unless the jurisdictions take steps to
comply with the law and remove ineligible voter registrations within 90 days.
Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act requires jurisdictions to take
reasonable efforts to remove ineligible registrations from its rolls.
Despite
successful litigation by Judicial Watch to bring counties and states into
compliance with the National Voter Registration Act, voter registration lists
across the country remain significantly out of date. According to Judicial
Watch’s analysis of data released by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission
(EAC) this year, there are 378 counties nationwide that have more voter
registrations than citizens living there and old enough to vote, i.e., counties
where registration rates exceed 100%. These 378 counties combined had about 2.5
million registrations over the 100%-registered mark, which is a drop of about
one million from Judicial Watch’s previous
analysis of voter registration
data. Although San Diego County removed 500,000 inactive names from voter rolls
following Judicial Watch’s settlement with Los Angeles County, San Diego still
has a registration rate of 117% and has one of the highest registration rates
in the country.
These inactive voters are not just extra
paper cluttering up files in various county offices. Instead, explained Tom
Fitton, Judicial Watch’s president, they expose American elections to the
risks of significant corruption:
“Dirty voting
rolls can mean dirty elections and Judicial Watch will insist, in court if
necessary, that states follow federal law to clean up their voting rolls,” said
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “Previous Judicial Watch lawsuits have
already led to major cleanups in California, Kentucky, Indiana, and Ohio – but
more needs to be done. It is common sense that voters who die or move away be
removed from the voting rolls.”
Fitton’s concerns take on special
resonance when one considers that California counties are among the worst
culprits. This is especially true in Central and Southern California, both
regions with high populations of illegal immigrants and legal green
cardholders. After all, as Hillary and her supporters never stop reminding us,
she may have lost the Electoral College, but she won the popular vote. And
while voter
fraud is bipartisan, it’s still interesting to
note that, per a post-election analysis, Hillary’s meaningless popular vote
victory came from . . . California:
As we noted
in this space earlier, while
Clinton's overall margin looks large and impressive, it is due to Clinton's
huge margin of victory in one state — California — where she got a whopping 4.3
million more votes than Trump.
California is
the only state, in fact, where Clinton's margin of victory was bigger than
President Obama's in 2012 — 61.5% vs. Obama's 60%.
[snip]
If you take
California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump wins the rest of the
country by 1.4 million votes. And if California voted like every other Democratic
state — where Clinton averaged 53.5% wins — Clinton and Trump end up in a
virtual popular vote tie.
Because California is a one-party state,
it’s possible that all of Hillary’s votes were legitimate. And it’s also
possible that, with a lot of deadwood in the country registrars’ offices, they
were not. Ultimately, everyone benefits when county registrars follow the law
and maintain accurate, up-to-date records.
“Furthermore,
the much-quoted estimate of 11 million undocumented aliens in the U.S. may be
woefully short of the truth. A new study by Yale University suggests the true
number of illegals is probably in the 20-to-30 million range, more than enough
to kill the two-party system at one stroke, if they eventually receive the
citizenship amnesty promised by Democrats.” JAMES DELMONT…. AMNESTY WILL ENABLE 40 MILLION ILLEGALS TO BRING UP THE REST OF
THEIR FAMILIES. NOW DO THE MATH ON THE LOOMING JOBS, HOUSING AND SOCIAL
SECURITY CRISIS.
"The newly elected president, Andrés López-Obrador,
was gleeful during the election when he told his compadres they should all move to America, illegally. His encouragement
along with his pro-poverty policies will set the stage for another tsunami of
illegal immigration." COLIN FLAHERTY
California’s de facto
status as a one-party state lies at the heart of its poverty problem. With a permanent majority in the
state senate and the assembly, a prolonged dominance in the
executive branch, and a weak opposition, California Democrats have long been free to indulge blue-state ideology while paying little or no political price. The state’s poverty problem is unlikely to improve while policymakers remain unwilling to unleash the engines of economic prosperity that drove California to its golden years. Kerry Jackson
executive branch, and a weak opposition, California Democrats have long been free to indulge blue-state ideology while paying little or no political price. The state’s poverty problem is unlikely to improve while policymakers remain unwilling to unleash the engines of economic prosperity that drove California to its golden years. Kerry Jackson
Is the government of
Mexico behind this? You have seen quotes from a Mexican President and a Mexican
Consul General in support of it. They have everything to gain and little to
lose by pushing it. The Mexican government is also pushing illegal immigration,
which destabilizes our economy. TOM BARRETT
One in every eleven persons born in Mexico has gone to the U.S. The National Review reported
that in 2014 $1.87
billion was spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add
hundreds of billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr
Is Mass Immigration Killing Two-Party Democracy
in the U.S.?
It used to be that
legal immigrants would divide their votes once they became citizens. But that
was then.
Few seem
willing to admit it, but mass immigration appears to be killing democracy in
the United States. Two-party democracy
withstood the unprecedented mass immigration of the 1870-to-1914 period because
the European immigrants tended, for one reason or another, to vote for both
parties. That is not true today. In the 19th century, newcomers voted along
religious lines to a remarkable degree: Irish Catholics 80 percent Democrat and
all Catholics 70 percent Democrat. But after the Civil War, Germans and
Scandinavians, heavily Lutheran, voted Republican, as English Canadian and
British immigrants did. In the famous turning-point presidential election of
1896, urban working-class immigrants tended to vote Republican, organized by
the active and powerful political machines in big cities like New York,
Philadelphia, and Chicago. Very few in the mass migration of that day moved to
the American South, which remained solidly Democrat. The two-party system
survived throughout most of the country as both parties had urban political
machines that provided social services to immigrants.
The present
massive wave of immigration that began in the 1970s, largely as a result of the
extended family clause in the 1965 Kennedy immigration reform bill, has had
remarkably different results. The new immigrants are voting overwhelmingly
Democrat: Hispanics 2 to 1, Asians about 70 percent (all election figures from
the Pew Research
Center). The children of Asian immigrants
voted 82 percent for Barack Obama in 2008. In addition, black Americans who
used to vote Republican now vote 90 percent or more Democrat, as do black
immigrants.
California
not long ago was a state Republicans could win. Two presidents, Richard Nixon
and Ronald Reagan, came from California and major offices such as governor were
regularly won by Republicans. Today California is a permanently blue state,
with its wealth of electoral votes. Its U.S. senators, governor, and most of
its members of Congress are Democrats. Democrats have a supermajority in both
houses of the Legislature and have changed the constitution so that party
primaries have been banned in favor of “open” primaries in which Republicans
are likely not to finish higher than third, thus not making the November
ballot. In the last two U.S. Senate races, 2016 and 2018, voters were offered
Democrat No. 1 and Democrat No. 2 as choices. Unsurprisingly, Democrats won
both elections, and one of the winners, Kamala
Harris, is now running for president.
The
demographic tidal wave of mostly Third World immigrants who vote heavily
Democrat is now running legally at a million a year, an all-time record, and is
turning red states purple and then blue. Arizona
is going, Colorado and Georgia are going, Virginia is gone, North Carolina is
tipping, and Florida is a dead heat but the immigration trends
(south-of-the-border Latinos and Puerto Ricans) are against the GOP. Even Texas
is drifting leftward as Latinos bid to become a solid majority there. There is
the myth, of course — offered by members of the Bush family — that Hispanics
will see the light and begin voting like Indiana Republicans. In
fact, Hispanics have voted Democrat since 1960, and they went for Obama in
2008 by 67-31 percent and for Hillary Clinton in 2016 by 66-28 percent. So much
for the Bush theory. Asians voted 77 percent for Obama in 2012 and 79 percent
for Clinton in 2016. So much for the two-party system.
Furthermore,
the much-quoted estimate of 11 million undocumented aliens in the U.S. may be
woefully short of the truth. A new study by Yale University suggests the true
number of illegals is probably in the 20-to-30 million range, more than enough
to kill the two-party system at one stroke, if they eventually receive the
citizenship amnesty promised by Democrats.
The
two-party system in the U.S. has been healthy since 1796, when Thomas Jefferson
took on John Adams in the presidential contest. They met again in 1800 in a
more famous showdown, by which time the earliest political parties had formed
and taken on ideological hues that still exist today. The ideal situation for a
healthy democracy and a workable two-party system is a stable population. If
the population is stable (and growing slowly), each party has an opportunity to
persuade the public of its merits. That opportunity is disappearing quickly
because the population is not stable. We are not far from the time when the
U.S. will have a Latino majority and will, regrettably, be a one-party state.
Apparently, that is what Democrats want.
James Delmont, author of The
Great Liberal Death Wish, has been
published in Financial Times, USA Today, the Baltimore Sun,
the Weekly Standard, the Saturday Evening Post, the Daily
Caller, the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, the Omaha World-Herald, and
other publications. He has taught at the University of Nebraska-Omaha, the
University of Minnesota, and other institutions.
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
What will America stand for in 2050?
The US should think long and hard about the
high number of Latino immigrants.
high number of Latino immigrants.
By Lawrence Harrison
It's not just a
short-run issue of immigrants competing with citizens for jobs as unemployment
approaches 10 percent or the number of uninsured straining the quality of
healthcare. Heavy immigration from Latin America threatens our cohesiveness as
a nation.
MEXICO WILL DOUBLE U.S.
POPULATION
By Tom Barrett
At the current rate of invasion (mostly through Mexico, but also
through Canada) the United States will be completely over run with illegal
aliens by the year 2025. I’m not talking about legal immigrants who follow US
law to become citizens. In less than 20 years, if we do not stop the invasion,
ILLEGAL aliens and their offspring will be the dominant population in the
United States.
FINISHING AMERICA OFF: THE
FOREIGN INVASION FOR “CHEAP” LABOR
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/09/the-fall-of-america-by-invitation-tens.html
Open the floodgates of our
welfare state to the uneducated, impoverished, and unskilled masses of the
world and in a generation or three America, as we know it, will be gone. JOHN
BINDER
But many
less-skilled migrants play their largest role by simply shifting small slices
of wealth from person to person, for example, by competing up rents in their
neighborhood or by competing down wages in their workplace. The crudest
examples can be seen in agriculture.
Overall, the
Washington-imposed economic policy of economic growth via immigration shifts
wealth from young people towards older people by flooding the
market with cheap
white-collar and blue-collar foreign labor.
CALIFORNIA UNDER THE DEMOCRATS: Worst Lower
Education System in the Nation!
"California’s public education system,
once the envy of the world, now ranks 49th in the nation." ROBERT J. CRISTANO, Ph.D
Accounting for these differences reveals that California's
real poverty rate is 20.6 percent – the
highest in America, and nearly twice the national average of 12.7 percent.
"The public schools indoctrinate their young charges to
hate this country and the rule of law. Illegal aliens continue
overwhelming the state, draining California’s already depleted public
services while endangering our lives, the rule of law, and public safety
for all citizens."
IMMIGRATION AS ECONOMIC WAR ON THE AMERICAN
MIDDLE-CLASS.
However, the dominant force in American politics for the last
two decades has been economic warfare against American citizens.
This economic warfare has two primary components; the use of
government to economically favor one group over another; and the collusion of
immigrant groups to economically inhibit Americans who oppose replacement
migration.
JOSHUA FOXWORTH – AMERICAN THINKER
"This is country
belongs to Mexico" is said by the Mexican Militant. This is a common
teaching that the U.S. is really AZTLAN, belonging to Mexicans, which is taught
to Mexican kids in Arizona and California through a LA Raza educational program
funded by American Tax Payers via President Obama, when he gave LA RAZA
$800,000.00 in March of 2009!
The “mother of all caravans” is forming in Central America, and our
border-enforcement system is at “the breaking point” — all because Democrats in Congress
rejects any effort to plug the legal loopholes that drive the accelerating flood at the
border. In effect, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer are doing just what Cesar
Chavez complained about 40 years ago: placating employers by allowing the
unhindered importation of cheap labor to undermine the efforts of American
workers to negotiate higher wages. MARK KRIKORIAN
THE
AMNESTY HOAX
But the business community will have little
reason to defend Trump, partly because they have gotten their double-shot of
tax cuts and cheap labor. In fact, the legislation does not sunset the amnesty,
meaning it can be quietly expanded with a few legal tweaks that can be attached
to any of the myriad obscure bills annually passed by Congress.
Yes, it is by invitation of the Democrat and
Republican parties on behalf of their rich paymasters!
"Critics argue that
giving amnesty to 12 to 30 million illegal aliens in the U.S. would have an
immediate negative impact on America’s working and middle class — specifically
black Americans and the white working class — who would be in direct
competition for blue-collar jobs with the largely low-skilled illegal alien
population." JOHN BINDER
Most importantly, the newborn is
deportation insurance for its parents. Illegal aliens facing deportation can
argue that to deport one or more parents would create an “extreme hardship” for
the new baby. If an immigration officer agrees, we’ve added a new adult to the
nation’s population. At age 21 the former birthright citizen baby can formally
apply for green cards for parents and siblings, and they, in turn, can start
their own immigration chains.
US now has more Spanish
speakers than Spain – only Mexico has more
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/29/us-second-biggest-spanish-speaking-country
·
US has 41 million native speakers plus 11 million who are
bilingual ·
New Mexico, California, Texas and Arizona have highest
concentrations
AMNESTY
AND WIDE OPEN BORDERS IN THE AGE OF INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM: It's all about
keeping wages depressed!
However, the dominant
force in American politics for the last two decades has been economic warfare
against American citizens.
This economic warfare has
two primary components; the use of government to economically favor one group
over another; and the collusion of immigrant groups to economically inhibit
Americans who oppose replacement migration.
JOSHUA FOXWORTH – AMERICAN
THINKER
MEXICO’S INVASION by invitation!
"The amnesty activist also said that the “border has been a
crooked proposition from the beginning, and it will continue to be twisted to
meet political ends,” adding that many open-borders activists still insist that
“people didn’t cross the border, the border crossed them.”
“At some point we will have to accept the fact that the border
between Mexico and the United States is nothing more than an invention. It was
demarcated in 1848, following a war that cost Mexico about half its territory
(it’s no coincidence that cities like Los Angeles, San Antonio and San
Francisco have Spanish names),” Ramos said. “Also, it’s been said a thousand
times that many people didn’t cross the border, the border crossed them. And
the cultural and commercial ties between the two sides remain in place to this
day. Look at the fellowship exhibited by cities like El Paso, Texas, and Ciudad
Juárez, Mexico even if barbed wire and concrete barriers have been erected in
some places along the divide.” LA RAZA SUPREMACIST JORGE RAMOS
1. What nation
occupied the land for 300 years on which Mexicans now live?
2. What nation purchased 525,000 sq. miles of that land from Mexico for $15 million dollars?
3. What nation has a tougher immigration policy than the one who bought the land?
4. What nation built a wall along its Southern border to keep out illegal aliens?
5. What nation has millions of Mexican and Central American immigrants who came here legally and who don't want any illegal immigrants invading their country, stealing their jobs and bringing gangs, crime, drugs, infectious disease and human trafficking along with them?
6. What nation has millions of legal Latino immigrants who are proud to be citizens of a host country that is a sovereign nation with defined borders and with more individual freedoms and economic opportunities than any place on earth?
7. What people would like to tell the race-baiting, Jose Ramos, "Vete a la mierda!"?
2. What nation purchased 525,000 sq. miles of that land from Mexico for $15 million dollars?
3. What nation has a tougher immigration policy than the one who bought the land?
4. What nation built a wall along its Southern border to keep out illegal aliens?
5. What nation has millions of Mexican and Central American immigrants who came here legally and who don't want any illegal immigrants invading their country, stealing their jobs and bringing gangs, crime, drugs, infectious disease and human trafficking along with them?
6. What nation has millions of legal Latino immigrants who are proud to be citizens of a host country that is a sovereign nation with defined borders and with more individual freedoms and economic opportunities than any place on earth?
7. What people would like to tell the race-baiting, Jose Ramos, "Vete a la mierda!"?
ANSWERS:
1. Spain
2. United States
3. Mexico
4. Mexico
5. United States
6. United States
7. Latino Americans and other Americans who are not liberal Democrats.
2. United States
3. Mexico
4. Mexico
5. United States
6. United States
7. Latino Americans and other Americans who are not liberal Democrats.
America Created Just 20,000 Jobs in February...and
those all went to foreign born!
Exclusive–Mo Brooks:
‘Masters of the Universe’ Want More Immigration to ‘Decrease In mes of
Americans’
Consequently,
the pumping of ultra-cheap money into the financial system,
fueling speculation and parasitism, together with ever-widening
social inequality, is not a temporary measure but must be
made permanent.
The declining living standards of
the working class are feeding directly into the retail apocalypse and
mass layoffs of retail workers will only exacerbate the issue.
Workers’ wages have seen little to no
growth in the last four decades, and any economic growth experienced
since 2008 has gone to
“US household net worth sees biggest fall since crisis”
“Trump Touts Legal Immigration System for
‘Our Corporations’ at Expense of
American Workers “– JOHN
BINDER
Trump’s
shift from a wage-boosting legal immigration system to one that benefits corporations
and their shareholders coincides with recent big business lobby influence over
his White House, at the behest of advisers Jared Kushner and Brooke Rollins.
“Trump Abandons ‘America First’ Reforms: ‘We
Need’ More Immigration to Grow Business Profits” JOHN BINDER
Additionally, Koch spokespeople at the donors’ conference said the
network has its sights set on pushing amnesty for millions of illegal aliens
this year.
DYING AMERICA: Poverty,
Open Borders, Widespread Homelessness, Housing Crisis, Opioids, Corrupt
Politicians and Then Suicide!
"In a state like Florida, where immigrants make up about 25.4
percent of the labor force, American workers have their weekly wages reduced by
perhaps more than 12.5 percent. In California, where immigrants make up 34
percent of the labor force, American workers’ weekly wages are reduced by
potentially 17 percent." JOHN BINDER
"In the
last decade alone, the U.S. admitted ten million legal immigrants,
forcing American workers to compete against a growing population of low-wage
foreign workers. Meanwhile, if legal immigration continues, there will be 69
million foreign-born residents
living in the U.S. by 2060. This would represent an unprecedented electoral
gain for the Left, as Democrats win about 90 percent of
congressional districts where the foreign-born population exceeds the national
average."
THE INVASION!
MEXICO UNDER, OVER
AND OCCUPYING AMERICA AT STAGGERING COSTS
https://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2019/04/mexico-in-meltdown-narco-state-pouring.html
"While other witnesses at Mr. Guzmán’s trial in Federal District Court in
Brooklyn have testified about huge payoffs from traffickers to the Mexican
police and public officials, the testimony about Mr. Peña Nieto was the most
egregious allegation yet. If true, it suggests that corruption by drug cartels
had reached into the highest level of Mexico’s political establishment."
The former president of Mexico, Enrique Peña Nieto, took a $100 million bribe from Joaquín Guzmán Loera, the infamous crime lord known as El Chapo, according to a witness at Mr. Guzman’s trial. ALAN FEUER
“Mexican drug cartels are the “other” terrorist threat to
America. Militant Islamists have the goal of destroying the United
States. Mexican drug cartels
are now accomplishing that mission – from within, every day, in
virtually every community across this country.” JUDICIAL WATCH
Migrant enclaves already are at the top of the U.S. lists for
bad places to live - 10 of the 50 worst places in America to live
according to this list are in California, and all of
them are famous for their illegal populations. MONICA SHOWALTER
California—not Mississippi, New Mexico, or West Virginia—has
the highest poverty rate in the United States. According to the Census Bureau’s
Supplemental Poverty Measure—which accounts for the cost of housing, food,
utilities, and clothing, and which includes noncash government assistance as a
form of income—nearly one out of four Californians is poor. Kerry Jackson
California’s de facto status as a one-party state lies at the
heart of its poverty problem. With a permanent majority in the state senate and
the assembly, a prolonged dominance in the executive branch, and a weak
opposition, California Democrats have long been free to indulge blue-state
ideology while paying little or no political price. The state’s poverty problem
is unlikely to improve while policymakers remain unwilling to unleash the
engines of economic prosperity that drove California to its golden years. Kerry Jackson
As Breitbart
News reported, if chain migration is not ended —
as President Donald Trump has demanded — the U.S. electorate will forever be
changed, with between seven to eight million new foreign-born individuals being
eligible to vote because of chain migration, and overall, an additional 15
million new foreign-born voters.
Missouri Senator Claire McCaskillhas identified
California Senator Kamala Harris as the party leader on issues of immigration
and race. Harris wants a moratorium on construction of new immigration-detention facilities in favor of the old “catch and release” policy for illegal aliens, and has
urged a shutdown of the government rather than compromise on mass amnesty.
No Justice for Taxpaying Americans
By Howie Carr
But the real double standard kicks in when the undocumented Democrat gets to the courtroom. A taxpaying American can only dream of the kid-gloves treatment these Third World fiends get.
By Howie Carr
But the real double standard kicks in when the undocumented Democrat gets to the courtroom. A taxpaying American can only dream of the kid-gloves treatment these Third World fiends get.
Illegal aliens continue
overwhelming the state, draining California’s already depleted public services
while endangering our lives, the rule of law, and public safety for all
citizens. Arthur Schaper
The Federation for
American Immigration Reform estimates that California spends $22 billion on
government services for illegal aliens, including welfare, education, Medicaid,
and criminal justice system costs. STEVEN BALDWIN
Heather Mac Donald of the Manhattan
Institute has testified before a Congressional committee that in 2004, 95% of
all outstanding warrants for murder in Los Angeles were for illegal aliens; in
2000, 23% of all Los Angeles County jail inmates were illegal aliens and that
in 1995, 60% of Los Angeles’s largest street gang, the 18th Street gang, were
illegal aliens.
THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S WAR ON AMERICA’S
LEGAL WORKERS, BORDERS AND LAWS as they build the LA RAZA welfare state on our
backs.
One in every eleven persons born in Mexico has gone to the U.S. The National Review reported that in 2014 $1.87 billion was spent on incarcerating illegal immigrant criminals….Now add hundreds of billions for welfare and remittances! MICHAEL BARGO, Jr.
"Chairman
of the DNC Keith Ellison was even spotted wearing a
shirt stating, "I don't believe in borders" written in Spanish.
According
to a new CBS news poll, 63
percent of Americans in competitive congressional districts think those
crossing illegally should be immediately deported or arrested. This
is undoubtedly contrary to the views expressed by the Democratic Party.
Their
endgame is open borders, which has become evident over the last eight
years. Don't for one second let them convince you otherwise." Evan Berryhill Twitter @EvBerryhill.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/07/assault-on-american-worker-college-grad.html
Mexican
Invasion
By
Tom Barrett (04/19/2005)
At the current rate of invasion (mostly
through Mexico, but also through Canada) the United States will be completely over
run with illegal aliens by the year 2025. I’m not talking
about legal immigrants who follow US law to become citizens. In less than 20
years, if we do not stop the invasion, ILLEGAL aliens and their offspring will
be the dominant population in the United States. According to US Border Control
(see LINK below). “They will have made such inroads into the political and
social systems that they will have more influence than our Constitution over
how the U.S. is governed. The ugly consequence of an ignored U.S. Constitution
is already taking place.” The millions upon millions of illegal aliens
streaming into the US are the foundation for what could be another attempt at
secession by several US states. Many of them will use ill-conceived
programs that reward illegal immigration to become US citizens. Other
illegals will simply go to the polls and vote without taking the trouble to
apply for citizenship. Together, these groups could form a voting block
that could tear our nation apart. Those of you who read the email version
of this column should go to www.ConservativeTruth.org to see the map posted there. It shows the
borders of a new nation proposed by influential Mexican nationals and Hispanic
US Citizens. (See LINK below: Professor Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland'.) It
includes six northern states of Mexican, as well as Texas, New Mexico,
Arizona, California, and southern Colorado. The idea of a Hispanic Homeland
could be ignored as the pipedream of crackpots if a substantial majority of
Mexican citizens did not support it. A Zogby poll of Mexicans done in June 2002
revealed that a substantial majority of Mexican citizens believe that
southwestern America properly belongs to Mexico. They said that Mexicans do not
need the permission of the U.S. to enter this territory. 58 percent of Mexican
citizens agreed with this statement: "The territory of the United States'
southwest rightfully belongs to Mexico." Only 28 percent disagreed with
the statement. Listen to what some Mexican government officials and US leaders
(including politicians and Professors at taxpayer-funded Universities) have to
say on this subject. Jose Angel Gutierrez, professor, University of Texas,
Arlington and founder of La Raza Unida political party screams at rallies:
"We have an aging white America. They are dying. They are ******** in
their pants with fear! I love it! We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what
I mean by that is if the worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill
him!" (See LINK below.) Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council
"They’re afraid we’re going to take over the governmental institutions and
other institutions. They’re right. We will take them over. Mario Obledo,
California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Jerry Brown,
who was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Bill Clinton, says,
“California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn’t like it should
leave." Proposition 187 was the California initiative supported by a
majority of Californians that denied taxpayer funds for services to
non-citizens. Speaking at a Latino gathering in response to Proposition 187’s
passage in 1995, Art Torres, the Chairman of the California Democratic Party,
said: "Power is not given to you. You have to take it. Remember, 187 is
the last gasp of white America in California." The national newspaper of
Mexico, Excelsior: "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning
to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot." Gloria
Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor: "We are politicizing every single
one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country...I gotta
tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I’m going to go out there and
vote because I want to pay them back." Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul
General: “We are practicing ‘La Reconquista’ in California." "Reconquista"
means the reconquest of the US southwest by Mexico. (See LINK below.). These
people are serious! They think they are going to take US territory. The Mexican
President declared it here in our country, and Bill Clinton signed a
Presidential Executive Order that paves the way for at least part of Mexico’s
dream. Mexican President Ernesto Zedillo said in Chicago on July 23, 1997,
"I have proudly affirmed that the Mexican nation extends beyond the
territory enclosed by its borders and that Mexican migrants are an important – a
very important – part of this. For this reason, my government proposed a
constitutional amendment to allow any Mexican with the right and the desire to
acquire another nationality to do so without being forced to first give up his
or her Mexican nationality." Translation: It is next to impossible to
receive Mexican citizenship unless you can prove you are of Mexican descent.
But Mexico knows that the US has soft immigration laws and will grant
citizenship to almost anyone. (After all, we grant citizenship every day to
immigrants from countries who have sworn to destroy us.) So Mexico wants to
take advantage of this ridiculous situation by encouraging their citizens to
apply for US citizenship while keeping Mexican citizenship. That way the
Mexican government can influence the political process here in the US.
Executive Order 13122, signed on May 25, 1999, by the most treasonous president
this nation has ever been cursed with, Bill Clinton, established an Interagency
Task Force on the Economic Development of the Southwest Border. Part of the
Order reads, "The Southwest Border or Southwest Border region is defined
as including the areas up to 150 miles north of the United States-Mexican
border in the States of Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and California." According
to experts on international law, this sets the stage for a 150-mile-wide
“Border Zone” that will neither belong to Mexico or the US. This could then
become the first area of a Hispanic Nation that would eventually encompass the
areas shown in the map of the proposed Republica del Norte (The Northern
Republic). Our government, pushed by liberal Democrats, has been systematically
laying the groundwork for such a breakaway republic. Did you know that
immigrants from Mexico and other non European countries can come to this
country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts? It’s
called affirmative action or racial privilege. Some time ago a vote was taken
in the U.S. Congress to end this practice. It was defeated. Every single Democratic
senator except Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges for
Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants. They were joined by thirteen
Republicans. Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that they believe
that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is good. They have also
backed special privileges for these immigrants. Mexico, a nation that has
benefited enormously from American generosity is now working to destabilize our
country. Is “destabilize” too strong a word? I don’t think so. Whether or not
Mexican leaders think they can actually create enough hatred against “gringos”
to accomplish the creation of a new republic made up of mainly US territory,
they know that pushing that agenda will cause huge political problems here and allow
Mexico to accomplish many of their goals. Is the government of Mexico behind
this? You have seen quotes from a Mexican President and a Mexican Consul
General in support of it. They have everything to gain and little to lose by
pushing it. The Mexican government is also pushing illegal immigration, which
destabilizes our economy. The US Border Control website (see LINK below)
shows an illustration from a Mexican government publication showing their
citizens how to best illegally enter the US. Why? It takes the strain of taking
care of unemployed Mexicans off the Mexican treasury and puts it on the US
treasury. And when the illegals get on welfare, they send some of their money
home, which helps the Mexican economy. All this talk by Mexican and US officials
about the US illegally occupying Mexican territory does nothing but breed
racial hatred. The sad thing is that none of this is about race. It is about
the things that all wars and conflicts are about: Greed, power and money. I
don’t like to talk about a problem without offering a solution. The US
politicians and professors who advocate taking US territory are guilty of
sedition. Remove them from their offices and (hopefully) put them in a federal
penitentiary where they can consider the error of their ways. The Mexican
politicians who do the same are guilty of inciting sedition. This is very close
to an act of war. Immediately cut of all economic aid to Mexico until its
government publicly disavows this lunatic plan. Finally, we must realize that
we can’t stop this by marching US troops into Mexico. We should use troops to
guard our borders, because the US Border Patrol cannot cover the huge US-Mexico
border without help. And we need to use pass laws that will stop the government
from rewarding illegal immigrants at the expense of those who follow the law.
We have a huge immigration problem in this country. This ridiculous Hispanic
Homeland idea is just a symptom of the problem. INTERNET RESEARCH: Professor
Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland' 1. http://www.aztlan.net/homeland.htm
Professor Predicts 'Hispanic Homeland'
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. — A University of New Mexico Chicano Studies professor
predicts a new, sovereign Hispanic nation within the century, taking in the Southwest
and several northern states of Mexico. Charles Truxillo suggests the “Republica
del Norte,” the Republic of the North, is “an inevitability.” He envisions it
encompassing all of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and southern
Colorado, plus the northern tier of Mexican states: Baja California, Sonora,
Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo León and Tamaulipas. Along both sides of the
U.S.-Mexico border “there is a growing fusion, a reviving of connections,”
Truxillo said. “Southwest Chicanos and Norteño Mexicanos are becoming one
people again.” Truxillo, 47, has said the new country should be brought into
being “by any means necessary,” but recently said it was unlikely to be formed
by civil war. Instead, its creation will be accomplished by the electoral pressure
of the future majority Hispanic population in the region, he said.
January 6, 2019
California admits
it has no idea whether non-citizens voted in last primary
After a hard-fought battle to obtain records by the
Sacramento Bee, we now learn that California's electoral officials are
admitting that they have no idea how many illegals and other non-citizens
voted in the last primary, based on the state's motor-voter registration, which
has been shown to have registered thousands of non-citizen voters. The
Bee reports:
California officials still can’t say whether non-citizens voted in
the June 2018 primary because a confusing government questionnaire about
eligibility was created in a way that prevents a direct answer on citizenship.
Apparently, tens of thousands of foreign nationals and other
ineligible voters, maybe 16 year olds, got registered
to vote at the DMV when they applied for
their drivers licenses whether they asked for it or not.
Investigators can see that people marked themselves as ineligible
to vote or declined to answer eligibility questions, but they can’t tell
why.
“We can’t assume why they declined to answer eligibility questions
or why they said they were not eligible,” the Secretary of State’s Office wrote
in an internal memo on Oct. 8, 2018.
That email and other documents The Sacramento Bee obtained through
the Public Records Act shed light on why the Secretary of State has been unable
to say clearly whether non-citizens voted last year. The
Bee filed a legal complaint for
the records when the Secretary of State initially withheld most of them.
The email shows that, for months, California officials have been
examining whether non-citizens voted last year. On Thursday, Secretary of State
Alex Padilla confirmed for the first time that his office has an active
internal investigation into the matter.
“The Secretary of State’s office does not comment on the details
of ongoing investigations,” the office said in a statement. “Determining
whether ineligible individuals who were erroneously registered to vote by the
DMV cast ballots requires a complete review. The Secretary of State’s office is
doing its due diligence by conducting a thorough investigation.”
Spokesmen for the office declined to say how the department could
otherwise determine citizenship of those registered.
This doesn't even include the undoubtedly significant numbers of
voters who answered that they were eligible to vote when they were not. Could
that have happened when the ballot-harvestors were out patrolling illegal
immigrant neighborhoods in search of votes? At a minimum, it most
certainly was possible, especially, since claims to voter-eligibility on
drivers license forms are never checked in California (it's the honor
system), according to voter-integrity activists. It also doesn't help that
California sneakily had residents sign to certify on their yellow mail-in
ballots that they were California residents(rather
than voting-eligible citizens) so as to prevent for illegals any potential
perjury charges in addition to vote-fraud charges.
If California has no idea who's a citizen, and has resisted every
effort out there to get that information (it has defied cooperation with
President Trump's electoral integrity commission), well, then what we can
conclude is that they don't want to know if a non-citizen is voting and now the
word is out that they don't. Apparently, Democratic interests in 'counting all
the ballots' as they say, means counting illegal ones, too.
They don't know, they don't want to know, and they aren't about
to clean this up. Keep after them, Sacramento Bee. In this case, the
Bee is a newspaper that's doing its actual job.
Ballot-harvesting gets just a little harder in California, thanks
to
Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch has forced the state of California and Los Angeles
county to end its practice of keeping 'inactive' voters on the voter rolls as
is required by federal law. Here's the news
from the legal watchdog:
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it
signed a settlement
agreement with the State of
California and County of Los Angeles under which they will begin the process of
removing from their voter registration rolls as many as 1.5 million inactive
registered names that may be invalid. These removals are required by the
National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
The NVRA is a federal law requiring the removal of inactive
registrations from the voter rolls after two general federal elections
(encompassing from 2 to 4 years). Inactive voter registrations belong, for the
most part, to voters who have moved to another county or state or have passed
away.
Los Angeles County has over 10 million residents, more than the populations
of 41 of the 50 United States. California is America’s largest state, with
almost 40 million residents.
The state of California, run completely by Democrats, of course,
resisted this (at least until the midterm was over). They decided that
cleaning up inactive voters from the rolls wasn't in their interest and federal
laws were for other states, little states. And as a result, nearly a quarter of
California's counties had more voters registered than actual eligible voters.
And surprise, surprise, the state has suddenly turned solid blue.
L.A. county's approximately 1.5 million inactive voters on
those rolls (112% of age-eligible citizens alone) had been perfect fodder
for ballot-harvestors, not this last time at midterms (all of the Democratic ballots
harvested in the last midterm have made their voters active voters),
but for upcoming elections. That rich bank of potential Democratic votes
from ballot-harvesting is now gone with this Judicial Watch agreement.
Ballot-harvesting is a disturbing phenomenon so prone to abuse
it's illegal in most states. In California, where it's not, Democratic
operatives selectively pay visits to the homes of indifferent voters who don't
want to go to the polls or mail in their ballots, engage those voters, and
then "help" them fill out their ballots in the way Democrats
want. That's why conservative areas such as Orange County were suddenly flipped
blue and popular candidates such as Young Kim, who had been winning by large
margins on election night - suddenly saw their results flipped. Democrats
learned that by extending the election count for weeks, turning in harvested
ballot after harvested ballot, they could win any election.
But the harvest had been incomplete, and with
many inactive voters, Democrats would need that bank of more
potential votes, which likely explains why California's Democrats resisted any
cleanup of voter rolls. California may have mailed these people ballots
whether they liked it or not or asked for it or not, as they did with all of
us, and well, Democratic ballot-harvestors could have easily gotten hold
of those unasked for ballots in the mailboxes of dead, moved-away, or
incapacitated voters and saw to it that they somehow got cast.
(Judicial Watch is investigating that one, too.)
The state's chief vote counter, Secretary of State Alex Padilla,
insists that not a single voter will be disenfranchised, given all his 'safeguards.' His official plan is to mail in a confirmation form to inactive
voters and strike their names if they don't respond, but somehow, I suspect the
ballot-harvestors will be paying visits to these inactive residents,
who may be indifferent and incapacitated voters, and somehow will get
them to mail those forms in, too, thereby subverting the process.
That said, Judicial Watch's victory is a great one and frees them
up to focus on other areas of abuse that are rife in California, such as
non-citizen registrations (the state still
says it has no idea how many there are),
illegal immigrant votes already cast, ballot harvestors using coercion,
foreign ballot-harvestors, gerrymandering, straight out fraud, and the whole cavalcade of
Democrat tricks that have disenfranchised conservative voters in the
state.
It's a welcome glimmer of light from a one-party state.
January 6, 2019
California admits
it has no idea whether non-citizens voted in last primary
After a hard-fought battle to obtain records by the
Sacramento Bee, we now learn that California's electoral officials are
admitting that they have no idea how many illegals and other non-citizens
voted in the last primary, based on the state's motor-voter registration, which
has been shown to have registered thousands of non-citizen voters. The
Bee reports:
California officials still can’t say whether non-citizens voted in
the June 2018 primary because a confusing government questionnaire about
eligibility was created in a way that prevents a direct answer on citizenship.
Apparently, tens of thousands of foreign nationals and other
ineligible voters, maybe 16 year olds, got registered
to vote at the DMV when they applied for
their drivers licenses whether they asked for it or not.
Investigators can see that people marked themselves as ineligible
to vote or declined to answer eligibility questions, but they can’t tell
why.
“We can’t assume why they declined to answer eligibility questions
or why they said they were not eligible,” the Secretary of State’s Office wrote
in an internal memo on Oct. 8, 2018.
That email and other documents The Sacramento Bee obtained through
the Public Records Act shed light on why the Secretary of State has been unable
to say clearly whether non-citizens voted last year. The
Bee filed a legal complaint for
the records when the Secretary of State initially withheld most of them.
The email shows that, for months, California officials have been
examining whether non-citizens voted last year. On Thursday, Secretary of State
Alex Padilla confirmed for the first time that his office has an active
internal investigation into the matter.
“The Secretary of State’s office does not comment on the details
of ongoing investigations,” the office said in a statement. “Determining
whether ineligible individuals who were erroneously registered to vote by the
DMV cast ballots requires a complete review. The Secretary of State’s office is
doing its due diligence by conducting a thorough investigation.”
Spokesmen for the office declined to say how the department could
otherwise determine citizenship of those registered.
This doesn't even include the undoubtedly significant numbers of
voters who answered that they were eligible to vote when they were not. Could
that have happened when the ballot-harvestors were out patrolling illegal
immigrant neighborhoods in search of votes? At a minimum, it most
certainly was possible, especially, since claims to voter-eligibility on
drivers license forms are never checked in California (it's the honor
system), according to voter-integrity activists. It also doesn't help that
California sneakily had residents sign to certify on their yellow mail-in
ballots that they were California residents(rather
than voting-eligible citizens) so as to prevent for illegals any potential
perjury charges in addition to vote-fraud charges.
If California has no idea who's a citizen, and has resisted every
effort out there to get that information (it has defied cooperation with
President Trump's electoral integrity commission), well, then what we can
conclude is that they don't want to know if a non-citizen is voting and now the
word is out that they don't. Apparently, Democratic interests in 'counting all
the ballots' as they say, means counting illegal ones, too.
They don't know, they don't want to know, and they aren't about
to clean this up. Keep after them, Sacramento Bee. In this case, the
Bee is a newspaper that's doing its actual job.
January 6, 2019
Ballot-harvesting gets just a little harder in California, thanks
to
Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch has forced the state of California and Los Angeles
county to end its practice of keeping 'inactive' voters on the voter rolls as
is required by federal law. Here's the news
from the legal watchdog:
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it
signed a settlement
agreement with the State of
California and County of Los Angeles under which they will begin the process of
removing from their voter registration rolls as many as 1.5 million inactive
registered names that may be invalid. These removals are required by the
National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
The NVRA is a federal law requiring the removal of inactive
registrations from the voter rolls after two general federal elections
(encompassing from 2 to 4 years). Inactive voter registrations belong, for the
most part, to voters who have moved to another county or state or have passed
away.
Los Angeles County has over 10 million residents, more than the
populations of 41 of the 50 United States. California is America’s largest
state, with almost 40 million residents.
The state of California, run completely by Democrats, of course,
resisted this (at least until the midterm was over). They decided that
cleaning up inactive voters from the rolls wasn't in their interest and federal
laws were for other states, little states. And as a result, nearly a quarter of
California's counties had more voters registered than actual eligible voters.
And surprise, surprise, the state has suddenly turned solid blue.
L.A. county's approximately 1.5 million inactive voters on
those rolls (112% of age-eligible citizens alone) had been perfect fodder
for ballot-harvestors, not this last time at midterms (all of the Democratic
ballots harvested in the last midterm have made their voters active
voters), but for upcoming elections. That rich bank of potential
Democratic votes from ballot-harvesting is now gone with this Judicial Watch
agreement.
Ballot-harvesting is a disturbing phenomenon so prone to abuse
it's illegal in most states. In California, where it's not, Democratic
operatives selectively pay visits to the homes of indifferent voters who don't
want to go to the polls or mail in their ballots, engage those voters, and
then "help" them fill out their ballots in the way Democrats
want. That's why conservative areas such as Orange County were suddenly flipped
blue and popular candidates such as Young Kim, who had been winning by large
margins on election night - suddenly saw their results flipped. Democrats
learned that by extending the election count for weeks, turning in harvested
ballot after harvested ballot, they could win any election.
But the harvest had been incomplete, and with
many inactive voters, Democrats would need that bank of more
potential votes, which likely explains why California's Democrats resisted any
cleanup of voter rolls. California may have mailed these people ballots
whether they liked it or not or asked for it or not, as they did with all of
us, and well, Democratic ballot-harvestors could have easily gotten hold
of those unasked for ballots in the mailboxes of dead, moved-away, or
incapacitated voters and saw to it that they somehow got cast.
(Judicial Watch is investigating that one, too.)
The state's chief vote counter, Secretary of State Alex Padilla,
insists that not a single voter will be disenfranchised, given all his 'safeguards.' His official plan is to mail in a confirmation form to inactive
voters and strike their names if they don't respond, but somehow, I suspect the
ballot-harvestors will be paying visits to these inactive residents,
who may be indifferent and incapacitated voters, and somehow will get
them to mail those forms in, too, thereby subverting the process.
That said, Judicial Watch's victory is a great one and frees them
up to focus on other areas of abuse that are rife in California, such as
non-citizen registrations (the state still
says it has no idea how many there are),
illegal immigrant votes already cast, ballot harvestors using coercion,
foreign ballot-harvestors, gerrymandering, straight out fraud, and the whole cavalcade of
Democrat tricks that have disenfranchised conservative voters in the
state.
It's a welcome glimmer of light from a one-party state.
Bienvenidos a Mexico: California's ballot-harvesting, sure
enough, is borrowed from Mexico
In an extraordinary investigative piece on how ballot-harvesting
works by Steve Miller, published on Real Clear Investigations, we learn an
amazing amount of information about how ballot-harvesting works and why it's so
closely connected to election fraud, skewing elections in directions they
normally wouldn't go. Themust-read
piece is focused on how
Texas is dealing with the seedy issue, enforcing the law, prosecuting more
than twice as many cases of electoral
fraud as California, even hampered as Texas is by weak penalties for violators.
But a little detail stands out much deeper into the piece: Ballot-harvesting,
which is at the root of considerable fraud of all kinds, is a practice
specifically borrowed from Latin America, with a very
impressive Latino analyst, K.B. Forbes,
who has electoral experience in both countries, citing Mexico. Here's the
passage:
The practice has its roots in Latin America, said K.B. Forbes, a
political consultant and Hispanic activist who has served as an elections
observer in Sonora, Mexico. “In the Latin culture, they have colonias, which is
‘little colony,’ literally,” he said. “In these, they sometimes have the
equivalent of a precinct boss, and that’s how people move up. The
[politiqueras] deliver the vote and when the candidate moves in, the theory is
that they get a good post inside the government.”
That brings up California, where ballot-harvesting is perfectly
legal, and normal voters have to wonder how the heck that happened.
Ballot-harvesting has been a disaster for Republicans in California, with all
conservatives now shut out from any representation in once-red Orange County.
Most congressional elections there showed Republican candidates in the lead on
election night in the last midterm, but all of them flipped to Democrats as the
Democrat-led ballot-harvesting brought in votes and votes and votes from
supposed precincts, harvested by their political operatives, until the result
went the other way. (This by the way, didn't happen in districts where
Democrats held a small lead, nothing flipped in their cases and ballots did not
keep rolling in).
If ballot harvesting is a practice imported from Mexican politics,
what does that say about California politics, whose legislators would embrace
Mexican electoral practices over the U.S. standard? As I mentioned earlier,
Mexico has been called "a
perfect dicatorship" by none other
than Nobel Prize-winning literary lion Mario Vargas Llosa, owing to the
continuous power of the Mexican Partido
Revolucionario Institucional (or
P.R.I.), which up under a decade or two ago, had a hammerlock monopoly on
Mexican politics, winning every single election in what was then a one-party
state. That's a system so bad people emigrated illegally from that country to
get away from it. Now, the cultural practice is right there waiting for them in
California, albeit, virtually nowhere else.
And like the P.R.I.'s Mexican electoral practice of
ballot-harvesting, it's noteworthy that the ruling Democrats of California also
are famous for doling out the goodies to the loyal voters. They've promised
amazing things to California's illegal immigrant population, with the latest
thing free heath care. California's insurance commissioner, the respected
non-partisan Steve Poizner, was, conveniently, ballot-harvested out of office
after an election-night lead several days after midterm by utterly leftist
Democrat Ricardo Lara who openly declared his support and big plans for free
health care for illegals. He's tried it before in the legislator and now he's
going to do it this time through the executive. California's incoming governor,
of course, is all in for the goody-slinging. In Mexico, they used to pass out
bags of beans for votes. In California, the prizes are considerably higher, and
they go well beyond free health care. I've already noted the weird
similarities to how California is run, and P.R.I-style politics here.
Any wonder California is going way out of its way to welcome
illegal immigrants? "You're all welcome here," as Gov. Jerry Brown
famously said. California already hosts a quarter of the nation's illegals, and
with middle class families now moving out due to high living costs and punitive
taxation, the California P.R.I. likes new bodies coming in who have a lot of
needs, which keeps the congressional seats numerous and the federal funds
flowing.
It all makes a normal person wonder about the weird closeness of
California officials and their Mexican counterparts, too. Newsom has already
paid a visit to Mexico to discuss the caravan with the Mexican government in
Mexico City (not Tijuana, where he would have gotten a earful from the generally
conservative and more dissident-oriented Tijuana locals), and he has declared
he plans to withdraw National Guard troops from the U.S. border. With his party
now embracing the P.R.I's style of governance and having some unnaturally close
ties to Mexican officials (I've seen it myself at Los Angeles functions as a
guest of the Mexican government), it looks like a growing merger of Mexican and
California politics.
Mexico knows how bad the system is, and its citizens did rebel
against it with a Trump-like leftist president, Andres Manuel Lopez-Obrador,
who won on a vow to end corruption. One can safely take that as a sign that
Mexicans are trying to move away from that kind of politics, which of course
would include ballot harvesting. California, on the other hand, is moving
toward it, embracing what Mexico is trying to reject. That speaks pretty poorly
for the sorry state of affairs in California. It's only great for the rulers
and those they patronize, until the money runs out.
Until then, clarification about California's Mexico
borrowings need to stand as an incentive to other states about what not to do.
No comments:
Post a Comment