January 6, 2019
California admits it has no idea
whether non-citizens voted in last primary
After a hard-fought battle to obtain records by the
Sacramento Bee, we now learn that California's electoral officials are
admitting that they have no idea how many illegals and other non-citizens
voted in the last primary, based on the state's motor-voter registration, which
has been shown to have registered thousands of non-citizen voters. The
Bee reports :
California officials still can’t say whether non-citizens voted in
the June 2018 primary because a confusing government questionnaire about
eligibility was created in a way that prevents a direct answer on citizenship.
Apparently, tens of thousands of foreign nationals and other
ineligible voters, maybe 16 year olds, got registered
to vote at the DMV when they applied for
their drivers licenses whether they asked for it or not.
Investigators can see that people marked themselves as ineligible
to vote or declined to answer eligibility questions, but they can’t tell
why.
“We can’t assume why they declined to answer eligibility questions
or why they said they were not eligible,” the Secretary of State’s Office wrote
in an internal memo on Oct. 8, 2018.
That email and other documents The Sacramento Bee obtained through
the Public Records Act shed light on why the Secretary of State has been unable
to say clearly whether non-citizens voted last year. The
Bee filed a legal complaint for
the records when the Secretary of State initially withheld most of them.
The email shows that, for months, California officials have been
examining whether non-citizens voted last year. On Thursday, Secretary of State
Alex Padilla confirmed for the first time that his office has an active
internal investigation into the matter.
“The Secretary of State’s office does not comment on the details
of ongoing investigations,” the office said in a statement. “Determining
whether ineligible individuals who were erroneously registered to vote by the
DMV cast ballots requires a complete review. The Secretary of State’s office is
doing its due diligence by conducting a thorough investigation.”
Spokesmen for the office declined to say how the department could
otherwise determine citizenship of those registered.
This doesn't even include the undoubtedly significant numbers of
voters who answered that they were eligible to vote when they were not. Could
that have happened when the ballot-harvestors were out patrolling illegal
immigrant neighborhoods in search of votes? At a minimum, it most
certainly was possible, especially, since claims to voter-eligibility on
drivers license forms are never checked in California (it's the honor
system), according to voter-integrity activists. It also doesn't help that
California sneakily had residents sign to certify on their yellow mail-in
ballots that they were California residents (rather
than voting-eligible citizens) so as to prevent for illegals any potential
perjury charges in addition to vote-fraud charges.
If California has no idea who's a citizen, and has resisted every
effort out there to get that information (it has defied cooperation with
President Trump's electoral integrity commission), well, then what we can
conclude is that they don't want to know if a non-citizen is voting and now the
word is out that they don't. Apparently, Democratic interests in 'counting all
the ballots' as they say, means counting illegal ones, too.
They don't know, they don't want to know, and they aren't about
to clean this up. Keep after them, Sacramento Bee. In this case, the
Bee is a newspaper that's doing its actual job.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Friday signed an executive order permitting all registered voters in the Golden State to vote by mail in the upcoming presidential election, citing concerns stemming from the Chinese coronavirus pandemic.
“I signed an executive order that will allow every registered voter in California to receive a mail-in ballot,” Newsom said. “That mail-in ballot is important but it’s not an exclusive substitute to physical locations.”
“People that are otherwise not familiar with mail-in ballots, are uncomfortable with them, may have disabilities, may have other issues that may preclude that as an appropriate option, we still want to have the appropriate number of physical sites for people to vote as well,” the governor added.
Newsom said while offering voters the chance to vote by mail, he is committed to providing the ability to vote at a physical location on election day.
“There’s a lot of concern and excitement around this November’s election in terms of making sure that you can conduct yourself in a safe way and to make sure your health is protected and to make sure we are reaching out to all registered, eligible voters,” the governor stated. “And giving them the opportunity, giving them the choice not to feel like they have to go into a concentrated, dense environment where their health may be at risk but provide an additional asset and additional resources by way of voting by mail.”
In a statement to CNN, Trump campaign communications director Tim Murtaugh slammed the move by Newsom, calling it a “thinly-veiled political tactic” to “undermine” election security.
Newsom’s order comes as Democrats across the country are pushing efforts to allow voters to vote-by-mail in the 2020 election, despite concerns of potential voter fraud. On Wednesday, Reps. Joe Kennedy III (D-MA) and Mark Pocan (D-WI) went as far as to call for vote-by-mail to be permitted beyond the election.
“If we don’t act fast, we will jeopardize participation in what may be the most important election of our lifetime. People will stay home. Disproportionately, those people will be of color, who live in neighborhoods most likely to lose polling locations,” the Democrat lawmakers wrote in an op-ed for The Hill. “They’ll be students, single parents, and low-wage workers, who can’t put their lives on hold to go vote. They’ll be seniors and medically-vulnerable patients, who would be literally risking their lives just to cast their ballots. So a privileged few will get to decide our country’s trajectory while the people most impacted by this crisis are forced to forfeit their voice.”
Recent data has not shown a compelling public health justification for vote-by-mail. Wisconsin is one of the only U.S. states that held its primary election with in-person voting after the coronavirus lockdown began. Only a few dozen people at maximum were confirmed to have contracted the virus after participating either as voters or poll workers, and none of those cases were fatal. Out of the 413,000 participants, that equals an infection rate below two-hundredths of one percent. Just days later, South Korea held national elections which did not result in any new coronavirus cases.
Voter Fraud Goes Viral
Democrats exploit the pandemic with a push for mail-in
ballots.
May 5, 2020
Lloyd Billingsley
Last
month, California governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive
order for “all-mail” ballots for elections in May and
June. In similar style, Democrats in Congress have been pushing for ballots to
be mailed to every
registered voter for the November election . What could possibly go
wrong? Consider the California experience, starting back in 2004.
Proposition
71, the California
Stem Cell Research and Cures Initiative featured Christopher
Reeve, Brad Pitt, and Michael J. Fox touting life-saving cures for Alzheimer’s,
Parkinson’s and other diseases. The $3 billion proposition, backed by Democrat
tycoon Robert Klein, created the California Institute for Regenerative
Medicine (CIRM). The new state agency promptly hired former state senator and
Democrat Party boss Art Torres, and at one point handed out more
than 90 percent of its grants to institutions with
representatives on its governing board.
By
2020, CIRM had blown through the $3 billion but a ballpark figure for the
number of cures and therapies was zero, perhaps the biggest bust in state
history. Even so, CIRM is going back to the voters with the $5.5
billion California Stem Cell Research, Treatments, and Cures Initiative of 2020 . To
get the measure on the ballot, Klein’s Americans for Cures needed
950,000 signatures by April 18, and backers opted to push the envelope.
Signature
gatherers have been telling voters the measure was seeking only $1.5 billion, a
blatant falsehood. As the deadline approached, Don Reed, Americans for Cures
vice president of public policy, began pushing for mail-in signatures. “Your
signatures might literally save CIRM, helping us put a $5.5 billion
renewal bill on the ballot,” Reed
wrote . “Its purpose is to fight chronic diseases, like COVID-19, the
dread coronavirus—and so much more!!”
Reed
directed readers to a website with instructions to print out 16 pages, including
an “address block to fill out, with yourself as the signature collector, and
then four (just four!) signatures from people in your county. Your next door
neighbors, perhaps.” This package was to be mailed in to Melissa King,
executive director of Americans for Cures. She would take care of it from
there.
With
their fraudulent signature harvesting, the stem cell scammers replicate the
“ballot harvesting” of 2018. If things weren’t going the Democrat’s way, party
activists simply dredged up fake ballots by any means necessary, and that was
enough to push their candidate over the finish line. As it happens, the ballot
and signature harvesting comes on comes on top of massive voter fraud already
going on in California.
After
the 2016 election, California secretary of state Alex Padilla refused to
participate in a federal
probe of voter fraud . Democrats were already gearing up the “motor voter” plan, a boon
for foreign nationals illegally present in the United States. When the illegals
get driver’s licenses, the Department of Motor Vehicles automatically
registers them to vote .
By
2018, more than one million “new” voters were added to the rolls but Padilla
won’t say how many actually voted. Democrats now want mail-in ballots sent to
every registered voter across the country, and that would include millions of
illegals.
More
than 22 million people are illegally present in the United States, according to
a recent study by scholars
at MIT and Yale . The previous default figure of 11 million is more like the
number illegally present in California alone. Last year, when he challenged
Trump’s public-charge rule, attorney general Xavier Becerra displayed a chart
reading: “California is home to over 10
million immigrants ,” code for false-documented illegals.
State
Democrats protect the illegals from deportation through sanctuary laws, even
the many violent criminals in their ranks. Democrats also give illegals a host
of public benefits, including health care, in-state college tuition and
welfare, with zero compensation from the governments of the illegals’ own
countries. In return for the benefits and protection, the illegals serve as the
Democrats’ imported electoral college. This is what Democrats would like to see
on a national scale, but there’s a problem.
Democrats
and their deep state allies failed to prevent Donald Trump from becoming
president and the Russia and Ukraine hoaxes failed to remove him from office.
Trump is meeting the challenge of the pandemic, and with November coming up
fast, Democrats see viral voter fraud as their best shot to get Joe Biden, or
whoever replaces him, into the White House.
Nancy
Pelosi, once Gavin Newsom’s aunt by marriage, says Republicans are “ afraid
of the voice of the people . And that’s one of the reasons they want
to stand in the way of a more open democratic system at a time of a pandemic.”
In reality, the pandemic makes a stronger case for beefing up voter ID rules.
If
people are being tested for coronavirus on a massive scale, it makes sense to
verify that all voters are legitimate American citizens as the law
requires. To be fair, congressional candidates with unbelievable back
stories should also be required to provide full documentation. Munich
terrorist’s grandson Ammar Campa-Najjar comes to mind, but others
doubtless need scrutiny.
Meanwhile,
the signature count for the $5.5 billion California stem cell measure must be
completed by June 15. The election takes place on November 3. As President
Trump says, we’ll have to wait and see what happens.
Ballot-harvesting gets just a little harder in California, thanks
to Judicial Watch
Judicial Watch has forced the state of California and Los Angeles
county to end its practice of keeping 'inactive' voters on the voter rolls as
is required by federal law. Here's the news
from the legal watchdog :
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it
signed a settlement
agreement with the State of
California and County of Los Angeles under which they will begin the process of
removing from their voter registration rolls as many as 1.5 million inactive
registered names that may be invalid. These removals are required by the
National Voter Registration Act (NVRA).
The NVRA is a federal law requiring the removal of inactive
registrations from the voter rolls after two general federal elections
(encompassing from 2 to 4 years). Inactive voter registrations belong, for the
most part, to voters who have moved to another county or state or have passed
away.
Los Angeles County has over 10 million residents, more than the
populations of 41 of the 50 United States. California is America’s largest
state, with almost 40 million residents.
The state of California, run completely by Democrats, of course,
resisted this (at least until the midterm was over). They decided that
cleaning up inactive voters from the rolls wasn't in their interest and federal
laws were for other states, little states. And as a result, nearly a quarter of
California's counties had more voters registered than actual eligible voters.
And surprise, surprise, the state has suddenly turned solid blue.
L.A. county's approximately 1.5 million inactive voters on
those rolls (112% of age-eligible citizens alone) had been perfect fodder
for ballot-harvestors, not this last time at midterms (all of the Democratic
ballots harvested in the last midterm have made their voters active
voters), but for upcoming elections. That rich bank of potential
Democratic votes from ballot-harvesting is now gone with this Judicial Watch
agreement.
Ballot-harvesting is a disturbing phenomenon so prone to abuse
it's illegal in most states. In California, where it's not, Democratic
operatives selectively pay visits to the homes of indifferent voters who don't
want to go to the polls or mail in their ballots, engage those voters, and
then "help" them fill out their ballots in the way Democrats
want. That's why conservative areas such as Orange County were suddenly flipped
blue and popular candidates such as Young Kim, who had been winning by large
margins on election night - suddenly saw their results flipped. Democrats
learned that by extending the election count for weeks, turning in harvested
ballot after harvested ballot, they could win any election.
But the harvest had been incomplete, and with
many inactive voters, Democrats would need that bank of more potential
votes, which likely explains why California's Democrats resisted any cleanup of
voter rolls. California may have mailed these people ballots whether they
liked it or not or asked for it or not, as they did with all of us, and well,
Democratic ballot-harvestors could have easily gotten hold of those
unasked for ballots in the mailboxes of dead, moved-away, or
incapacitated voters and saw to it that they somehow got cast.
(Judicial Watch is investigating that one, too.)
The state's chief vote counter, Secretary of State Alex Padilla,
insists that not a single voter will be disenfranchised, given all his ' safeguards .' His official plan is to mail in a confirmation form to inactive
voters and strike their names if they don't respond, but somehow, I suspect the
ballot-harvestors will be paying visits to these inactive residents,
who may be indifferent and incapacitated voters, and somehow will get
them to mail those forms in, too, thereby subverting the process.
That said, Judicial Watch's victory is a great one and frees them
up to focus on other areas of abuse that are rife in California, such as
non-citizen registrations (the state still
says it has no idea how many there are),
illegal immigrant votes already cast, ballot harvestors using coercion,
foreign ballot-harvestors , gerrymandering, straight out fraud, and the whole cavalcade of
Democrat tricks that have disenfranchised conservative voters in the
state.
It's a welcome glimmer of light from a one-party state.
Bienvenidos a Mexico: California's
ballot-harvesting, sure enough, is borrowed from Mexico
In an extraordinary investigative piece on how ballot-harvesting
works by Steve Miller, published on Real Clear Investigations, we learn an
amazing amount of information about how ballot-harvesting works and why it's so
closely connected to election fraud, skewing elections in directions they
normally wouldn't go. The must-read
piece is focused on how
Texas is dealing with the seedy issue, enforcing the law, prosecuting more
than twice as many cases of
electoral fraud as California, even hampered as Texas is by weak penalties for
violators. But a little detail stands out much deeper into the piece:
Ballot-harvesting, which is at the root of considerable fraud of all kinds, is
a practice specifically borrowed from Latin America, with a very
impressive Latino analyst, K.B. Forbes ,
who has electoral experience in both countries, citing Mexico. Here's the
passage:
The practice has its roots in Latin America, said K.B. Forbes, a
political consultant and Hispanic activist who has served as an elections
observer in Sonora, Mexico. “In the Latin culture, they have colonias, which is
‘little colony,’ literally,” he said. “In these, they sometimes have the
equivalent of a precinct boss, and that’s how people move up. The
[politiqueras] deliver the vote and when the candidate moves in, the theory is
that they get a good post inside the government.”
That brings up California, where ballot-harvesting is perfectly
legal, and normal voters have to wonder how the heck that happened.
Ballot-harvesting has been a disaster for Republicans in California, with all
conservatives now shut out from any representation in once-red Orange County.
Most congressional elections there showed Republican candidates in the lead on
election night in the last midterm, but all of them flipped to Democrats as the
Democrat-led ballot-harvesting brought in votes and votes and votes from
supposed precincts, harvested by their political operatives, until the result
went the other way. (This by the way, didn't happen in districts where
Democrats held a small lead, nothing flipped in their cases and ballots did not
keep rolling in).
If ballot harvesting is a practice imported from Mexican politics,
what does that say about California politics, whose legislators would embrace
Mexican electoral practices over the U.S. standard? As I mentioned earlier,
Mexico has been called " a
perfect dicatorship " by none other
than Nobel Prize-winning literary lion Mario Vargas Llosa, owing to the
continuous power of the Mexican Partido
Revolucionario Institucional (or
P.R.I.), which up under a decade or two ago, had a hammerlock monopoly on
Mexican politics, winning every single election in what was then a one-party
state. That's a system so bad people emigrated illegally from that country to
get away from it. Now, the cultural practice is right there waiting for them in
California, albeit, virtually nowhere else.
And like the P.R.I.'s Mexican electoral practice of
ballot-harvesting, it's noteworthy that the ruling Democrats of California also
are famous for doling out the goodies to the loyal voters. They've promised
amazing things to California's illegal immigrant population, with the latest
thing free heath care. California's insurance commissioner, the respected
non-partisan Steve Poizner, was, conveniently, ballot-harvested out of office
after an election-night lead several days after midterm by utterly leftist
Democrat Ricardo Lara who openly declared his support and big plans for free
health care for illegals. He's tried it before in the legislator and now he's
going to do it this time through the executive. California's incoming governor,
of course, is all in for the goody-slinging. In Mexico, they used to pass out
bags of beans for votes. In California, the prizes are considerably higher, and
they go well beyond free health care. I've already noted the weird
similarities to how California is run, and P.R.I-style politics here .
Any wonder California is going way out of its way to welcome
illegal immigrants? "You're all welcome here," as Gov. Jerry Brown
famously said. California already hosts a quarter of the nation's illegals, and
with middle class families now moving out due to high living costs and punitive
taxation, the California P.R.I. likes new bodies coming in who have a lot of
needs, which keeps the congressional seats numerous and the federal funds
flowing.
It all makes a normal person wonder about the weird closeness of
California officials and their Mexican counterparts, too. Newsom has already
paid a visit to Mexico to discuss the caravan with the Mexican government in
Mexico City (not Tijuana, where he would have gotten a earful from the
generally conservative and more dissident-oriented Tijuana locals), and he has
declared he plans to withdraw National Guard troops from the U.S. border. With
his party now embracing the P.R.I's style of governance and having some unnaturally
close ties to Mexican officials (I've seen it myself at Los Angeles functions
as a guest of the Mexican government), it looks like a growing merger of
Mexican and California politics.
Mexico knows how bad the system is, and its citizens did rebel against
it with a Trump-like leftist president, Andres Manuel Lopez-Obrador, who won on
a vow to end corruption. One can safely take that as a sign that Mexicans are
trying to move away from that kind of politics, which of course would include
ballot harvesting. California, on the other hand, is moving toward it,
embracing what Mexico is trying to reject. That speaks pretty poorly for the
sorry state of affairs in California. It's only great for the rulers and those
they patronize, until the money runs out.
Until then, clarification about California's Mexico
borrowings need to stand as an incentive to other states about what not to do.
Former President Barack Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder
admitted he saw coronavirus as “an opportunity” to permanently change the way
Americans voted.
“Coronavirus gives us an
opportunity to revamp our electoral system so that it permanently becomes more
inclusive and becomes easier for the American people to access,” Holder said in
an interview with TIME magazine.
He called for a “sea change” in
voting systems, allowing Americans to vote from home, using prepaid mail-in
ballots and unlimited absentee voting. Holder did not discuss concerns about
voter fraud in his interview but posited that any special exceptions made to
the voting process during the coronavirus should remain permanent.
“It would be foolhardy to take
these pro-democracy measures off the table after we get on the other side of
the virus,” he said. “These are changes that we should make permanent because
it will enhance our democracy.”
Holder’s comments align with
former President Barack Obama, who voiced support for mail-in voting and
joined forces with former First Lady Michelle Obama and prominent celebrities
to press the United States for more
mail-in voting.
Failed presidential candidate
Hillary Clinton and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have also called for mail-in voting in the
2020 election.
“Judicial Watch’s records request is designed
to expose how California state
legislators are
wasting tax dollars to take
care of another
corrupt politician – Eric
Holder – under the
guise of resisting the rule of
law on
immigration and other matters, ” stated
Judicial Watch president Tom
Fitton. “His
record at the Clinton and Obama
Justice
Departments demonstrates a
willingness to
bend the law in order to
protect his political
patrons. ”
CALIFORNIA COMRADES CHOOSE
COMRADE HOLDER
Any attorney general who is not an activist is not doing his or
her job.
Eric Holder
In Part One of this series, we exposed the Chicano Marxist take over
of the California legislature and their plans to defy federal immigration
laws and expected actions of the incoming Trump administration. Gov. Jerry
Brown’s nomination of Xavier Becerra to be California’s next Attorney General was the first of
many steps to protect the pervasive lawlessness of the radical left. Becerra
has already taken an aggressive and combative stance against President-elect
Donald Trump, vowing to fight Trump’s efforts to enforce immigration laws, and
even block attempts to deport criminal illegal aliens. Trump’s campaign
centered on building a wall along the United States border with Mexico to
keep out illegal immigrants, violent gangs, and terrorists posing as
immigrants.
Xavier Becerra, currently a
12-year member of Congress, is an admitted member of MEChA, or “Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan,”
often likened to a Latino KKK.
Becerra’s Radical Plans
Recently, the State Assembly
Committee on the Office of the Attorney General asked nominee Becerra to
detail his plans on the issues of immigration, civil rights, the environment,
policing and consumer protection – apparently the only issues the California
Legislature is interested in Becerra defending.
In a letter released Saturday, Becerra praised California’s policies
helping illegal aliens get driver’s licenses, free college tuition, and free
lawyers to represent them in deportation cases, calling it “national
leadership.”
“All of these policies and
programs are representative of California’s values as a welcoming state,”
Becerra wrote to the Assembly committee.
Becerra also took a shot at
Trump for proposing to create a registry of Muslim immigrants during the
campaign.”Disturbing statements uttered during the recent Presidential campaign
have given rise to legitimate fears that the new federal administration might
seek to adopt policies that would discriminate against people based on factors
such as their religious belief,” Becerra wrote. “Any such policies would be
antithetical to the deepest constitutional values and traditions of this nation
— a nation founded in part by men and women fleeing religious
persecution.”
“I have no intention of
allowing this policy through the doors of California,” he wrote.
Like a good
progressive foot soldier, Becerra also vowed to fight for abortion,
calling it “reproductive freedom.”
Becerra said he will support
California’s recent legislation expanding voter registration and participation
in elections. He might want to look into the 650,000 newly registered
California voters, registered online only weeks before the election. According to the Los Angeles Times, “98% of all the growth in
California’s voter ranks in 2016 happened in just the last 45 days of the
registration season.”
As Attorney General,
Becerra has vowed to continue enforcing policies to combat climate change and
work to “transition Californians to a low-carbon way of life.” Becerra added
that a part of environmental protections is safe drinking water and vowed to
“pursue the goal of providing safe drinking water to all Californians.” Perhaps
Becerra can begin by supporting the safe drinking water bills that Assemblyman
Devon Mathis has tried to get passed over the last two years? In Mathis’
district, wells began going dry in East Porterville more than three years ago,
with more continuing to dry up every day.
Assemblyman Devon Mathis,
R-Porterville, authored the bills to provide $10 million to
homeowners (not farmers) to dig deeper wells and clean contaminated ones.
Both bills passed through the
Assembly and a state Senate committee without opposition, only to have Senate
Appropriations Chairman Ricardo Lara, D-Los Angeles and Mecha activist, put
both bills on suspense– one after the other, killing them and depriving 10,000+
low-income individuals access to running water. Sen. Lara was playing politics
with this Republican bill, despite the 10,000 poor people who need the clean
water.
Sanctuary Cities
California, through its 35
Sanctuary Cities, is clearly violating U.S. Federal Immigration law. Recently,
Democrat members of the State Legislature proposed two bills: SB 6 by Sen. Ben
Hueso, to create a state program to fund legal representation for illegal
aliens facing deportation, and AB 3 by Assemblyman Rob Bonta to create taxpayer-funded training
for defense attorneys and public defenders on immigration law for illegal
aliens.
And now California is going
to try to prevent the new Presidential administration from enforcing federal
immigration law despite the fact that the Constitution clearly imposes a duty
on the president and the executive branch, to enforce the law.
Hiring Eric Holder… for what?
Democrats in the California
State Legislature apparently decided Becerra isn’t enough legal muscle, and
recently hired former Obama Attorney General Eric Holder to fight a “clear and
present danger” from President-elect Trump… the same former Attorney General
Eric Holder who was once blasted for helping to
trigger a “war” on police and called America
“ a nation of cowards ” on the issue of race. However, he now says he sees his
“younger” self in Black Lives Matter activists… this is who California hired to
assist California’s top law enforcement officer?
Since Trump — who is not
referring to himself as “ The Office of President-Elect ,” as his predecessor did — has not yet taken office, nor
any official actions, it is hard to see specifically for what purpose Holder
has been hired.
There certainly is poetic
justice in hiring the failed Attorney General of the failed Obama
Administration to defend the failed and deteriorating policies of the Jerry
Brown administration and radical Democrats running the state.
Described as a “devious,
power-hungry, racial zealot,” Eric Holder is also a dubious choice since he is
the only U.S. Attorney General in history to be held in contempt of Congress,
when he refused to turn over Operation Fast and Furious documents to Congress. One of the most reckless law
enforcement operations ever conducted by the Justice Department, it involved
selling guns to Mexican drug cartels, and resulted in the death of a U.S.
border patrol agent, Brian Terry, as well as hundreds of Mexican citizens.
Under Holder’s watch at the
DOJ Civil Rights Division, more than half of all the lawyers hired were chosen
from four radical, anti-American organizations: the ACLU, National Council of
La Raza, NAACP, Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, and the
Lawyer’s Committee for Civil Rights, John Fund and Hans von Spakovsky outlined
in their 2014 book, “ Obama’s Enforcer: Eric Holder’s
Justice Department .”
Additionally, the Justice
Department under Holder, and now Loretta Lynch, has one of the worst records before the U.S. Supreme Court, losing
significantly more cases than either of the Bush or Clinton Departments of
Justice. “In most administrations, the department wins about 70 percent of the
cases before the Supreme Court; Mr. Holder’s department has a losing record and
has lost at least nine cases 9-0–even with Obama appointees Elena Kagen and
Sonia Sotomayor on the court,” wrote Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, in a review of “ Obama’s Enforcer: Eric Holder’s
Justice Department .”
Judicial Watch announced today
that it filed a records request with the California Legislature Joint Rules Committee
seeking to examine legislative records regarding the state’s employment of
former Obama U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Jr. The record request
includes:
All
contracts between the California Legislature and former U.S. Attorney General
Eric Holder Jr. or Covington and Burling.
All
communications between the California Legislature and former U. S. Attorney
General Eric Holder Jr. or Covington and Burling about the Legislature’s
retention of Holder and/or Covington and Burling.
“Judicial Watch’s records request is designed to expose how
California state legislators are wasting tax dollars to take care of another
corrupt politician – Eric Holder – under the guise of resisting the rule of law
on immigration and other matters, ” stated Judicial Watch president
Tom Fitton. “His
record at the Clinton and Obama Justice Departments demonstrates a willingness
to bend the law in order to protect his political patrons. ”
The hiring of Eric Holder by
the California Legislature confirms a lack of confidence in Xavier Becerra
by Gov. Brown and Democrats in the Legislature–which must be quite humiliating
for Becerra, especially after his promise to uphold California’s “progressive”
policies on immigration, Obamacare, energy, and criminal justice. “If you want
to take on a forward-leaning state that is prepared to defend its rights and interests,
then come at us,” Becerra said, directing his comment to Trump. Choosing
Holder also reiterates the anti-American, anti-Constitution, anti-religion
movement of Marxists in America, but particularly in California.
The biggest obstacle standing between Marxism and Marxist domination
of the world is America, and the U.S. Constitution. And standing between a
Marxist takeover of America is California – only when California is destroyed
can Marxists proceed.
No comments:
Post a Comment