Who
Invited The World To Infect America?
Hate the Chinese government if you wish, but hold your own
government responsible for hollowing America out like a husk.
By Ilana Mercer
American Greatness
https://amgreatness.com/2020/05/02/who-invited-the-world-to-infect-america/
GLOBALISM: THE RISE OF GLOBALIST CORPORATE FASCISM AND THE
CORPORATE WELFARE STATE AND THE DEATH OF AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS
Why is it all billionaires are Democrats and all Democrat
politicians are globalist for wider open borders?
So long as Americans know that
the Chinese will continue to settle this country by the thousands, while their
relatives back in China supply Americans with essential goods.
So long as Americans know that
the federal government and its corporate cronies do not intend to repatriate
life-sustaining supply chains.
“And it’s not merely for profit. Tech superstars like Gates are
true believers in the borderless multicultural state. These arrogant CEOs and
their minions are social-justice warriors, first; giants of industry, second.”
Who Invited The World To Infect America?
Hate the Chinese government if you wish, but hold your own government
responsible for hollowing America out like a husk.
On March 31, the number of Americans dead
from the Chinese coronavirus stood at 3,900! A
mere month on, at the time of writing, and 63,801 Americans have perished.
American deaths by COVID-19
account for a quarter of the world’s, including those in the undeveloped world.
To ignore this Third-World-like specter is to dismiss the dead and the dying. It’s
tantamount to cancel culture.
China sucks. But if the United
States must rely on the Chinese government to keep its citizens safe, then what
kind of a Mickey Mouse country are we?
If the American people can be
convinced by their government to saddle a foreign power
with the responsibility for their existential welfare—what kind of people are
we?
China didn’t force the traitors
of the American economy to shift crucial production lines to its country and
strand Americans without surgical and N-95 masks and medication; homegrown
turncoats made that decision, all by their lonesome.
Trade Goods, Not Places
Decades ago, the political,
corporate and industrial leaders of the West chose to enmesh the fate of their
pliable people with that of the vigorous, voracious Chinese.
Like the United States, another
hard-hit region—Northern Italy, so progressive and tony—had swung its toll
gates open. Italy outsourced whole production lines to China.
Free trade in goods is great.
But trade goods, not places. The toll gates were
swung open to human trade, or population replacement.
Since the Chinese had begun
settling in Northern Italy and buying up assets, I hazard that, much like youngsters of King
County, in Washington State—local Italian girls and boys
have had a hard time affording life in their homeland.
And now, their grandparents and
parents are dying.
Italy constructed gleaming
tarmacs to accommodate the many direct flights to and from Wuhan. More than 100,000 Chinese citizens moved to Italy. As the
Chinese accrued wealth over the past two decades, still more took up residence
in Northern Italy, and bought up Italian firms.
See if you can spot the trend.
New York City, by Wikipedia’s telling, is home to far and away “the highest Chinese-American population
of any city proper.”
Courtesy of an Italian strain
of COVID-19, the New York metropolitan area has been as badly struck as Italy.
In early April, it was said that “coronavirus was killing a person roughly every four
minutes in New York state, and about every six minutes in New York City.”
In my state of Washington, the
overwhelming majority of Chinese reside in King County and Snohomish
County, where the infection was
seeded and from where it spread.
The West’s political and
corporate leaders, not China’s, had opened their borders to the world’s flotsam
and jetsam. Agreements to exchange goods and people reflected the choices of
these gilded global elites, not those of their people.
Economic Elephantiasis
The sphinxly Bill Gates, we are
told, foresaw the pandemic. Gates also pioneered the outsourcing of American lives to China
(and India). I say “lives,” because, as it has become abundantly clear, in the
wake of COVID, the very stuff of life has been outsourced to
China. Not mere jobs; but careers,
not just some products, but entire production lines;
not one or two manufacturing plants, but the entire means
of production.
Engineers who can think hate
Gates. America’s best and brightest have done time supervising and titivating
squalid, sub-par Chinese factories, when they knew full well that, instead of
cheap, nasty, and disposable, their colleagues back at home could have
delivered classy, attractive, durable and sustainable products and production
capability, around which real communities would have coalesced.
Instead, Gates’ vision has
given us transient labor that flits between Wuhan and Washington, for, these
“global beasts with their vast balance-sheets” aren’t interested in the kind of
economic growth around which authentic, organic, enduring communities
congregate.
The attitude of American
business toward economic growth is rooted not in healthy, community-based
practices (stateside and abroad), but in some aberrant economic gigantism; in
an economic elephantiasis undergirded by hubris and greed.
Bill Gates, the point man,
the pinhead who pontificates about pandemic best practices, was among the powerbrokers
who decided, with his benefactors in D.C., that the “new economy” would hum not
in America, but in China and India.
And it’s not merely for profit. Tech
superstars like Gates are true believers in the borderless multicultural state.
These arrogant CEOs and their minions are social-justice warriors, first;
giants of industry, second. They are cosmopolitans who
believe consumption alone makes the world go round. Community? That’s when you
press flesh with George and Amal Clooney at the World Economic Forum in Davos!
No Multiculturalists in China
To the gilded globalists,
America is not a country to be bound by strictly controlled borders and to be
patrolled and policed against viruses and villains. Rather, Bill Gates’ America
is a territory for trade, not a nation.
A “shopping mall with nukes,”
as a reader put it.
Whereas China has positioned
its cohesive people for success, the American ruling class, Democrat and
Republican, have long since sold their countrymen out. It is American leaders,
left and right, who’ve convinced their population that Americans are nothing
unless strangers are streaming into their country at a rate of 2 million a
year, speaking in tongues and inaugurating wet-markets in New York
City. This is who we are, they tell
us.
No such thing did the Chinese
government perpetrate on its people. It doesn’t welcome immigrants; the Chinese
don’t want immigrants. Several [Chinese] “women vow to leap off the Great
Wall rather than marry a foreigner,” reports The Economist with consternation. Indeed, the Chinese people have no
qualms or fear about expressing Han racial superiority, this, as the West
embraces a multicultural mess of pottage that is now killing it and consigning
us to years of penury.
Stupidity is not a virtue.
Ironically, and although almost
all reinfection in China involves Chinese nationals, “curbs on foreigners are
tightening,” and the “border has been
shut to most of them.” Conversely, the American travel ban—I hope you know—was
nothing more than a rerouting of the Chinese influx to allotted U.S. airports,
where thermometers were pointed at foreheads, and tens of thousands of Chinese
were sent on their merry way, entrusted to go home and self-quarantine.
The outcome of future pandemics
hinges on the American people’s ability to strike fear into the hearts of their
leaders, irrespective of party affiliation—a fear that will make it
impossible for these shiftless characters to shift blame for their failings.
Where Accountability Goes to Die
The U.S. government and its
proxies would like to gull Americans into blaming China alone for
the litany of suffering Americans are enduring.
A free people takes
responsibility for its own welfare. Federalism dictates that this ostensibly
free people delegate certain responsibilities to the state, national, and local
levels. This is what the U.S. Constitution compelled. Defined duties have been
delegated to our governments. Repelling invaders is one of them.
Thus, the same free people must
saddle their own leaders, in D.C. and the Centers for Disease
Control, with mass deaths ongoing.
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
has ordered that China be investigated for concealing “information early
on about the novel coronavirus.”
Fine. I’m not here saying there
is no merit in the allegation or the investigation. Just so long as Americans
understand that government committees are where accountability goes to
die.
Governments create committees
to conceal their own culpability.
So long as Americans know that
the Chinese will continue to settle this country by the thousands, while their
relatives back in China supply Americans with essential goods.
So long as Americans know that
the federal government and its corporate cronies do not intend to repatriate
life-sustaining supply chains.
Hate the Chinese government if
you wish, but hold your own government responsible for hollowing America out
like a husk by inviting the word to invade it and infect it.
THE BUSH CRIME FAMILY HAS BEEN ASSOCIATED
WITH EVERY WAVE OF WALL STREET PLUNDER FOR THE LAST 50 YEARS.
THEY STARTED TWO WARS TO PROTECT THEIR SAUDIS
PAYMASTERS (WHO DO YOU THINK FUNDED THE BUSH PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY?) AND HAVE SABOTAGED
OUR BORDERS AND HOMELAND SECURITY FOR ENDLESS HORDES OF ‘CHEAP’ LABOR.
House of Bush, House of Saud: The Secret
Relationship between the World's Two Most Powerful Dynasties
Audible Audiobook – Abridged
How did the Bushes, America's most powerful
political family, become gradually seduced by and entangled with their Saudi
counterparts?
Why did the Bush administration approve the secret airlift of
140 Saudis, including two dozen relatives of Osama bin Laden, just after
September 11? Did one of the Saudi royals on the planes have any advance
knowledge of the attacks?
What specifically chosen words did George W. Bush say on
national television during the 2000 election campaign to trigger Muslim
support? How did Saudi-funded Islamic groups propel Bush to victory in Florida,
thus winning him the presidency?
The answers to these questions
lie in a largely hidden relationship between the House of Bush and the House of
Saud that began in the mid-1970s. An amazing weave of money, power, and
influence, it takes place all over the globe and involves war, covert
operations, and huge deals in oil and defense industries. But, most
horrifyingly of all, the secret liasion between these two great families helped
trigger the Age of Terror and give rise to the tragedy of 9-11.
Reviewed in the United
States
Verified Purchase
This book will test you.
When you wonder aloud why Congress doesn’t get anything done, foreign wars
continue without reason and deficits are so high, most are unable to see the cause.
Unger doesn’t explain it all but he explains the relationship between money and
power better than any book I’ve read to date.
The storyline of the book takes you through how the rich Saudi ruling class and really a group of Texan oilmen bonded over business. When you read about the genesis of the relationship in the 70s during the first part of the book, it looked merely like the cozy insider-only type of stuff that is common in the fabric of corporate America and most human relationships.
But the nuance Unger uncovers with his hawk-like ability to pull minutiae from rivers of source material outlines a darker agenda. His fact finding mission lays bare a Saudi elite trying to nudge the levers of power in Washington. And with this insight, Unger explains the nearly invisible pattern in which money buys powers in America. Unger’s work uncovers so many conspicuous connections amongst so many smart, ambitious men that coincidence is ruled out as the cause. Complicity makes the case here as well as any outsider like Unger can.
But the circumstantial nature of this book cannot be completely swept away. Unger has grokked the nefarious nature of this relationship but is missing the proverbial smoking gun. There is no ipso facto ‘A funded B which lead to C relationship’ outlined in the book. The closest we get to this as a reader is when the Bin Laden family and other Saudi royals are ferried out of the country while the FAA has all airspace on lockdown, a fascinating story that makes the TSA’s security theatre we endure at every airport comically irksome.
Recommending this book is easy, but to whom I would make that recommendation is difficult. If you sometimes watch/read the news with an open mind and wonder, “How did we get to this place?”, then I’d put this book on your list. If you’re knowledge of the middle east and current events is low, try paying attention to that news first, watch for the patterns and then read this to learn the connections. Most importantly though, any citizen trying to understand the ways in which money buys power in the modern nation-state needs to read this book.
The storyline of the book takes you through how the rich Saudi ruling class and really a group of Texan oilmen bonded over business. When you read about the genesis of the relationship in the 70s during the first part of the book, it looked merely like the cozy insider-only type of stuff that is common in the fabric of corporate America and most human relationships.
But the nuance Unger uncovers with his hawk-like ability to pull minutiae from rivers of source material outlines a darker agenda. His fact finding mission lays bare a Saudi elite trying to nudge the levers of power in Washington. And with this insight, Unger explains the nearly invisible pattern in which money buys powers in America. Unger’s work uncovers so many conspicuous connections amongst so many smart, ambitious men that coincidence is ruled out as the cause. Complicity makes the case here as well as any outsider like Unger can.
But the circumstantial nature of this book cannot be completely swept away. Unger has grokked the nefarious nature of this relationship but is missing the proverbial smoking gun. There is no ipso facto ‘A funded B which lead to C relationship’ outlined in the book. The closest we get to this as a reader is when the Bin Laden family and other Saudi royals are ferried out of the country while the FAA has all airspace on lockdown, a fascinating story that makes the TSA’s security theatre we endure at every airport comically irksome.
Recommending this book is easy, but to whom I would make that recommendation is difficult. If you sometimes watch/read the news with an open mind and wonder, “How did we get to this place?”, then I’d put this book on your list. If you’re knowledge of the middle east and current events is low, try paying attention to that news first, watch for the patterns and then read this to learn the connections. Most importantly though, any citizen trying to understand the ways in which money buys power in the modern nation-state needs to read this book.
Josh Hawley: Abolish the World Trade Organization in Wake of
Coronavirus
Samuel
Corum/Getty Images
5 May 2020414
3:45
Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) says the
World Trade Organization (WTO) should be abolished in the wake of the Chinese
coronavirus.
In an op-ed for the New York Times, Hawley credits
the WTO with helping to empower “China’s rise” while weakening American
workers:
BLOG: BUSH'S VISION OF
'NEW WORLD ORDER' HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH ANYTHING BUT HIS CARLYLE
GROUP/HALLIBURTON WAR MACHINE AND SAUDIS BIG OIL WHICH HIS FAMILY STARTED TWO
WARS AGAINST THE IRAQIS TO ADVANCE.
But in the early 1990s, with America’s
principal adversary gone, Western policymakers were in a messianic frame of
mind. President George H.W. Bush promised a “new world order” of “open
borders, open trade … and open minds,” a new international system based on
liberal values to bring peace to the world. He and other internationalists wanted
a new economic system to match. [Emphasis added]
…
Take the World Trade Organization. Its
mandate was to promote free trade, but the organization instead allowed some
nations to maintain trade barriers and protectionist workarounds, like China,
while preventing others from defending themselves, like the United
States. Foreign agriculture won concession after concession, while
American farmers struggled to get fair access to markets.Meanwhile, the W.T.O.
required American workers to compete against Chinese forced labor but did
next to nothing to stop Chinese theft of American intellectual property and
products. [Emphasis addd]
Under the W.T.O.’s auspices, capital and
goods moved across borders easier than before, no doubt, but so did jobs. And
too many jobs left America’s borders for elsewhere. As factories closed,
workers suffered, from small towns to the urban core. Inflation-adjusted,
working wages stagnated and upward mobility flatlined. [Emphasis added]
Enough is enough. The W.T.O. should
be abolished, and along with it, the new model global economy. The quest
to turn the world into a liberal order of democracies was always
misguided. It always depended on unsustainable American sacrifice and
force of arms. And its companion economic order has, in a similar vein, succeeded
mostly in weakening American workers and industry. [Emphasis added]
The U.S., Hawley writes, ought to “seek
new arrangements and new rules” to restore the nation’s economic sovereignty —
which includes returning to the economic system before the WTO’s creation,
where reciprocal trade “protected our national interests and the nation’s
workers.” Hawley writes:
That means returning production to this
country, securing our critical supply chains and encouraging domestic
innovation and manufacturing. It means striking trade deals that are truly
mutual and truly beneficial for America and walking away when they are not. It
means building a new network of trusted friends and partners to resist Chinese
economic imperialism.
Since the North American Free Trade
Agreement (NAFTA) was enacted and China entered the World Trade Organization
(WTO), nearly five million American manufacturing jobs have
been eliminated from the American
economy — 3.4 million of which are due
to U.S. free trade with China. The mass elimination of working- and
middle-class jobs and depressed U.S. wages due to NAFTA and China’s entering
the WTO have coincided with a more than 600 percent increase in trade deficits.
Of the 3.4 million American jobs lost
due to free trade with China, about 2.6 million — or about three-fourths — were
lost in the crippled manufacturing industry. U.S. trade deficits with China
have eliminated American jobs in all 50 states.
Bush
Center Slams Trump: We Want More Migration
3 May 202022
7:11
The
economics director at President George W. Bush’s advocacy center slammed President
Donald Trump’s popular, pro-American immigration policy.
The May 1 slam came just before Bush posted a May 2 video urging
national unity in the coronavirus crash that has pushed more than 25 million
Americans out of jobs.
“The most important thing to
remember in this is that we don’t want [Trump’s] temporary policy to become
permanent immigration policy,” economic director Laura Collins said a video
posted on the center’s Twitter account. She continued:
We know immigrants are good for the economy. We know they’re
good for our culture. We know they’re in this fight with us together, and we’re
going to meet them working with us side by side in any recovery after the
pandemic is over.
Trump’s April 22 immigration
policy says the
economic needs of American employees are more important than the immigration
preferences of foreigners. His policy temporarily trims the annual inflow of
legal immigrants and directs agencies to review visa worker programs in 30
days.
Polls show the
public — including recent immigrants — is overwhelmingly aligned with Trump in prioritizing
jobs for Americans over welcomes for legal immigrants.
The visa worker programs targeted by
Trump are extremely important to the Fortune 500. In response, the companies’
lobbyists and progressives allies have quickly launched a hard-nosed lobbying campaign and a soft-focus PR campaign to
protect the programs and mass migration.
Immigrants and native-born Americans have
always been on the same team driving American innovation and economic growth.
It will take #AllOfUS, working together, to restore the United States. https://thehill.com/changing-america/respect/diversity-inclusion/495352-jose-andres-naacp-and-others-launch-pro …
Jose Andres, NAACP and others launch pro-immigrant
coronavirus
Congress now accepts 1 million legal immigrants per year.
It also allows companies to keep roughly 2 million cheap and
complaint foreign visa-workers in U.S. jobs. The 2 million workforce includes
roughly 1.5 million foreign white-collar visa workers, plus roughly 400,000
foreign blue-collar guest workers, in professional or seasonal jobs needed by
roughly 26 million unemployed Americans.
Collins touted the corporate PR campaign, dubbed #AllofUs, in
her video slamming Trump’s pro-employee policy.
.@LVTCollins explains how it will take #AllOfUs, immigrants and native-born Americans, to defeat COVID-19. And once our
nation emerges from quarantine, it will take all of us working together to
restart our economy.
“The stated objectives of this executive order were to preserve
medical supplies in a pandemic for American immigrants already here and to
preserve job openings in any recovery for American workers that can be first in
line,” Collins said her video posted May 1.
She continued:
Unfortunately, this executive order is not going to accomplish
either of those objectives.
First of all, the virus affects all of us equally. It doesn’t
care who we are, or where we’re from. Current travel restrictions and
quarantine protocols in place, protect us from viral spread regardless of where
we’re from. And so there’s not really a need to prevent more people from coming
in in terms of slowing down viral spread. We know the virus is here and it’s
spreading. And what we’re doing is working.
However, Collins’ main focus is the economic worry that Trump’s
reform may permanently reduce the unending inflow of foreign workers,
consumers, and renters preferred by CEOs and investors. She said:
We know immigrants are good for the economy. We know immigrants
don’t compete with native-born Americans for jobs. And we know that before the
pandemic, there were millions of unfilled jobs in the United States.
If we assume that in any recovery, all those jobs come back,
every American that wants a job will have the ability to fill the jobs that
were there. We’re still going to have shortages and we’re going to need
immigrants there to help fill those jobs.
We simply don’t have a labor force at full employment, big
enough to fill all the jobs in the economy.
Immigrants — like the birth of Americans’ children — help grow
the economy. They expand the labor force, boost retail sales, spike real estate
values, fuel the stock market, and expand the number of companies. A growing
economy can be good for all — but it is especially good for wealthy people who
can invest in company stocks.
Yet every annual wave of immigrants also causes much economic
harm to the roughly 220 million Americans (and recent legal immigrants) who
work for a living, or who are educating themselves to take jobs in a few years.
Every new wave of legal immigrants
and illegal migrants competes for existing jobs and force down Americans’
wages. The arrivals also expand poverty, reduce pressure on investors to buy productivity-boosting machines, drive up the price of good housing, and add congestion to K-12
schools and universities.
Immigrants, and especially visa
workers, also push Americans out of careers and technological research, and they distort Americans’ politics by expanding cultural diversity and identity politics.
Over the last 30 years, since George Bush’s father signed a 1990 bill roughly doubling
immigration, the government’s massive inflow of immigrants has kept
Americans wages almost flat (until 2018) and so has turbocharged the U.S. stock
market.
The establishment’s immigration policy has worked with free
trade to shift much wealth from middle-class employees and the heartland states
towards the stock market and the major coastal cities.
Trump was elected in 2016 to help reverse the establishment’s
economic policy.
Since 2017, he has mostly stopped illegal migration, and
he pushed wages up for blue-collars in 2018 and 2019. He has also trimmed legal
immigration, and his April 22 policy sets the stage for incremental,
significant reductions in the visa worker programs, such as the little-known
B-1 and OPT visa programs.
Business lobbies strongly oppose reductions in immigration and
visa workers.
Public opinion has shifted strongly against mass migration, so a bipartisan
front of #AllofUScare billionaires is using
Christian & patriotic themes to help preserve their supply of
wage-cutting workers & rent-raising consumers. https://bit.ly/2VUqCXo
'All of Us Care' Billionaires Defend Migration Using
Christianity, Patriotism
Collins’ pro-migration views reflect George W. Bush’s
pro-business leaning and his 2001 push to allow U.S. employers to bypass
Americans and instead hire any willing workers from anywhere on the globe. The
2001 Twin Towers attack stopped Bush’s “Any Willing Worker” plan.
Collins insisted, “We know immigrants don’t compete with
native-born Americans for jobs.”
If immigrants “do jobs that Americans won’t do”, we should be
able to identify occupations in which the workers are nearly all foreign-born.
However, among the 474 separate occupations defined by the Department of
Commerce, we find only a handful of majority-immigrant occupations, and none
completely dominated by immigrants (legal or illegal). Furthermore, in none of
the 474 occupations do illegal immigrants constitute a majority of workers.
For example, companies provide the reward of green cards to
roughly 50,000 foreign visa-workers each year after those foreign workers have
taken technology jobs from Americans via the H-1B and other visa programs.
Business groups warn the Trump administration: 'Extend work permits for our
foreign visa-workers or we'll have "hundreds and thousands" of open
jobs for unemployed American voters.'#H1Bhttps://bit.ly/2YlijWd
Fortune 500 to Agencies: Help Keep U.S. Jobs Filled with
200,000-plus Visa Workers
EconomyImmigrationPoliticsAny Willing
WorkerGeorge W.
BushH-1BImmigrantsimmigrationMigrantsmigrationOpen Bordersvisa workers
Exclusive–Jeff Sessions: Why Bring Foreign Workers to U.S. When
30,000,000 Americans Are Jobless?
12,
4 May 20204,746
3:07
United
States Senate candidate Jeff Sessions says there is no shortage of American
labor, calling out lawmakers and their “corporate friends” for supporting a
continued flow of foreign workers to the U.S. to take jobs in the midst of mass
unemployment.
In an
exclusive interview with Alexander Marlow on SiriusXM Patriot’s Breitbart News Daily, Sessions
said it is critical that lawmakers defend the interests of unemployed Americans
who have been laid off due to forced business closures spurred by the Chinese
coronavirus crisis.
LISTEN:
“We have 30
million unemployed … We don’t have jobs in the United States,” Sessions said.
“There are no jobs now. We’ll lay off more people this week then we did last
week.”
“Why would
we bring in foreign workers to take jobs when we don’t have jobs for the
American people,” Sessions asked. “What theory is it that they’re operating
under when they try to justify such a policy position? It’s certainly not in
the interest of the American people. It’s in the interest of their corporate
friends and some ideology that they adhere to … so I do think that it’s time
for this Congress to deliver on its promises that the president made in the
campaign.”
Sessions
said more Republican lawmakers must be stepping up to the plate to take on China,
holding the communist regime accountable for wrecking the U.S. economy. A
select committee in the House and Senate, Sessions said, ought to be formed to
determine the truth behind China’s role in spreading the coronavirus to the
world.
“Where are
the rest of the Republicans? Where are they? I mean this is a big issue,”
Sessions said. “This party owes it to the American people to defend our
interests — American interests. And I don’t think there’s been near enough
action.”
“I would
think the first thing we need to do is to rally the people who understand the
significance of this and have what I call for, is a select committee to study
this pandemic and how it started,” Sessions continued. “We did that after the
attack on Pearl Harbor … where House and Senate appoint select members of
congress … and the charge is what did China know and what did they do, when did
they act on it or not, and did they lie about it? The world needs to know.”
As Breitbart
has reported, existing U.S. legal immigration law
greatly benefits China. Visa programs such as the EB-5 visa for wealthy foreign investors, the F-1 student visa, and J-1
visas allow about 180,000 Chinese nationals to enter the country every year
in addition to the 60,000 to 70,000 Chinese nationals who secure green cards
annually.
There are
nearly 500,000 Chinese students in the U.S. in
any given year — more than any other nation — taking seats in university
classrooms and looking to eventually obtain Optional Practical Training (OPT)
authorization to take entry-level jobs in white-collar professions.
No comments:
Post a Comment