What We’ve Learned From Recent Allegations Surrounding Jeffrey Epstein
Photo: Uncredited/AP/Shutterstock
The coronavirus may have pushed the Jeffrey Epstein story off the front pages, but in recent weeks fresh reporting and a trickle of new allegations have kept the saga alive. In early May, a Harvard University report shed new light on the convicted sex offender’s relationship with the institution. More recently, two newly released projects unearthed new details about the deceased financier’s alleged sex-trafficking ring: a four-part Netflix documentary, Filthy Rich, and a book by reporters Alana Goodman and Daniel Harper, A Convenient Death. Here are the new details these projects have unearthed.
Epstein’s Harvard ties were more extensive than previously known
A 27-page report released by Harvard University, the product of an investigation by the school’s general counsel and an outside law firm, outlines Harvard’s 25-year relationship with with Epstein. The financier exploited these connections to rehabilitate his image following his 2008 sex-crimes conviction. Epstein had his own office at the school’s Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, and had visited over 40 times between 2010 — when he was first released from custody — and 2018. According to the Boston Globe, he was often accompanied on his visits by “young women who acted as his assistants.” (The practice sounded quite similar to his frequent check-ins at the M.I.T. Media Lab down the road in Cambridge, where an alumni coordinator recalled asking the assistants “on the off chance” if they weren’t there by choice.)
Bill Clinton allegedly visited Little St. James
Steve Scully – the former IT contractor on Epstein’s private island, Little St. James – has previously offered some details about what went on there, but in the Netflix documentary Jeffrey Epstein: Filthy Rich he makes an explosive new allegation. Scully says that at some point during his employment from 1999 to 2005, President Bill Clinton visited Epstein on “Pedophile Island.”
“I saw Bill Clinton sitting with Jeffrey on the living-room porch area, which was Jeffrey’s favorite spot,” Scully said. “I saw no other guests there at that time at all. I just thought, ‘Hey, wow, Jeffrey’s sitting with Bill Clinton.’”
In court documents, Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre also recalled seeing the former president on the convicted sex offender’s island: “I remember having a dinner with Clinton. He was there, and I never saw him do anything improper … I wish, you know, he would just come clean about, like, ‘Yeah, I was there. So what? Who cares? I didn’t see anything going on.’” (According to a lawsuit filed in January by the attorney general of the U.S. Virgin Islands against Epstein’s estate, the financier had allegedly trafficked children as young as 11 to the island.)
A Clinton spokesperson denied such an appearance: “This was a lie the first time it was told, and it isn’t true today, no matter how many times it’s repeated,” said Angel Ureña. The two, however, were known to be friends prior to Epstein’s initial arrest in 2005, and Clinton flew on the financier’s private plane a total of 26 times, according to its flight logs.
Joseph Berlinger, the executive producer on Filthy Rich, told the Guardian that the project began in spring 2018 — prior to the Miami Herald’s pivotal Epstein reporting and the arrest of the financier in July. Berlinger said the inspiration for the project was James Patterson’s book on Epstein. In another example of the close connections among the elite circles Epstein traveled in — and a potential conflict of interest for a documentary in which Patterson has an executive-producer credit — Patterson is now writing his second political novel with Bill Clinton.
Bill Clinton allegedly had an affair with Ghislaine Maxwell
In A Convenient Death: The Mysterious Demise of Jeffrey Epstein, authors Alana Goodman and Daniel Halper report that the former president had an affair with Epstein’s alleged madam, Ghislaine Maxwell. “[Clinton] and Ghislaine were getting it on,” a source who witnessed the relationship told the authors. “That’s why he was around Epstein — to be with her.” A spokesperson for Clinton denied this allegation as well: “It’s a total lie today, it’s a total lie tomorrow, and it’ll be a total lie years from now,” said Angel Ureña.
Allegations of presidential impropriety aren’t new for Halper: An editor at the Drudge Report, he has written critically about the Clintons in his first book, Clinton Inc.: The Audacious Rebuilding of a Political Machine, in which he spoke with a source who alleged the former president was still cheating on his wife as of 2014.
Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and
perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions.
DEBORAH C TYLER
Tick...tick...tick -- The
stench of Epstein closing in on Bill Clinton
And there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't
naive at all about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible
accuser Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual
predator by others earlier.
Hillary the Punisher: Ronan Farrow says he was cut dead from
Clinton circles after he exposed Weinstein
Bill and Hill - and the Evil that Men Do
Hillary Clinton Is not just a sore loser, she is a total loser
Monica Lewinsky says Bill Clinton hinted she should perjure
herself, arranged a farewell Christmas tryst before dumping her
Allegation: S-exual assault
Anonymous female student at Yale University (1972)
Anonymous female student at the University of Arkansas (1974)
Anonymous female lawyer (1977)
Juanita Broaddrick (1978)
R-ape
Carolyn Moffet (1979)
Elizabeth Ward (1983)
Sally Perdue (1983)
Paula Jones (1991)
Sandra Allen James (1991)
Christy Zercher (1992)
Kathleen Willey (1993)
Monica Lewinsky. 22-year-old intern working for the President
Ronan
Farrow: Bill Clinton ‘Credibly’ Accused of Rape, Investigation Is ‘Overdue’
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/11/03/ronan-farrow-bill-clinton-credibly-accused-of-rape-investigation-is-overdue/
Pulitzer
Prize-winning journalist Ronan Farrow said on HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher, that
“credible” accusations of rape had been
made against former President Bill Clinton by Juanita Broaddrick, adding that
an investigation into the allegations is now “overdue.”
Where were the HOWLERS
when serial rapist Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein were on the
prowl?
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/07/30-lies-of-hillary-clinton-and-thats.html
Leaked Julian Assange
Message:
Hillary Is A ‘Well Connected,
Sadistic Sociopath’
Bill Clinton Accusers Speak
Out After Ronan Farrow Says Ex-President Was ‘Credibly Accused of Rape’
Then-Republican presidential candidate
Donald Trump (C) sits with, (L-R)Paula Jones, Kathy Shelton, Juanita
Broaddrick, and Kathleen Willey, before the second presidential debate with
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at Washington University in
St. Louis, on Oct. 9, 2016. (Evan Vucci/AP Photo)
O.K., Prince Andrew's out
of public life. Why isn't Bill Clinton?
MeToo movement "never wanted anything to do with the
victims of Bill Clinton” | Sky News Australia
Is someone gonna ask the
Clintons about all those trips to Epstein's 'cowboy village'?
Convicted sex offender and Mueller witness
George Nader indicted for illegal contributions to boost Hillary Clinton
Is that you, Bill Clinton?
New book says Epstein blackmailed politicians
How Stupid Do They Think
We Are?
We know Biden has roaming hands, but how far have they roamed?
Hillary Clinton on Women
Uncomfortable With Biden Touching Them: ‘Get Over It’
Ashton Carter (R) makes remarks after he
was sworn in as Secretary of Defense as his wife Stephanie (2nd L) Vice
President Joe Biden (L) listen in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in
Washington on Feb. 17, 2015. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and
perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions.
DEBORAH C TYLER
Tick...tick...tick -- The
stench of Epstein closing in on Bill Clinton
Much
of the fallout of the Jeffrey Epstein pedophilia among the powerful scandal has
fallen onto Prince Andrew of U.K., an insignificant second son of Queen
Elizabeth II. The pervert's suicide, though, and the increasingly
suspicion-arousing circumstances point to much more important people. As I've
argued before, the media scrum around Andrew seemed to be an attempt to deflect
attention from more powerful players involved with Epstein as the story burns
out and the public loses interest.
Beneficiary number
remains is Bill Clinton, whose associations with Epstein are pretty
astonishing. He's been listed on the flight logs of more than two
dozen Epstein "Lolita Express" flights. He's been a regular at
Epstein's "cowboy village" in New
Mexico with its group showers which, based on the word of maintence staff,
seemed to be all about perversion out of the public eye. He's been seen
with all those candy stripers.
Well,
now the lid's starting to bounce on that boiling pot, and maybe too soon for
Bill's tastes. The Sun of the U.K.'s new U.S. edition, now has an
astonishing series of photos of Clinton livin'
it up on Epstein's airplanes, Clinton posing with Epstein's accused pimp,
Ghislaine Maxwell, and Clinton whooping it up with underage staff, generally partying
hearty on the pervert's dime. Yet to this day he claims to know nothing about
what Epstein was about, never noticed a thing.
BILL Clinton poses side-by-side with suspected
pimp Ghislaine Maxwell - as the pair board pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s
notorious private jet.
The former US President is seen smiling on
the steps of the plane – dubbed the Lolita Express - next to Maxwell, in astonishing pictures exclusively obtained by
The Sun.
All
it can do is raise suspicions about whether Epstein's prison
"suicide" was in any way authentic - a question that even
(tick, tick, tick) 60 Minutes gave credibility
to, given the mounting evidence - and what Clinton might be trying to hide.
It's possible there are still pictures and cell phones and other
paraphernalia out there if it's not been preemptively destroyed. (After all, if
someone could have taken Epstein out to keep him from talking, how much more
likely they'd be to break and enter into some of Epstein's redoubts to destroy
the evidence.) It's conspiracy stuff, sure, but it's linked to a strange
chain of events.
Why
on earth would Clinton hang out with a revolting human being like Epstein
anyway? As Andrea Widburg has noted here, it's almost as if the
world's elites have some kind of power racket going, given that pedophilia is
all about power over the powerless. Clinton himself was out of power when he
started associating with the monster, and his wife Hillary had it while he
didn't. She even blithely ignored him when he warned her to go to Wisconsin in
2016, which cost her the election. His association had some kind of roots in
power.
What's
really strange is why the media is so intent on protecting Bill. Shouldn't he,
and for that matter, his longtime enabler Hillary Clinton be answering a few
questions from the press. To date, they are amazingly incurious. Yet as
pictures like the Sun's get out, the clock is now ticking.
And there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't
naive at all about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible
accuser Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual
predator by others earlier.
She is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and
criminally corrupt, and these are her good qualities. KENNETH ELIASBERG
Harvey
Weinstein has been exposed in the media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN
THINKERcom
Hillary the Punisher: Ronan Farrow says he was cut dead from
Clinton circles after he exposed Weinstein
Apparently, the queen and her moneymen are not to be
challenged.
Young Ronan Farrow learned that the hard way when he found
out he was persona
non grata from charmed social circles of Hillary Clinton
following his investigation into Hollywood movie producer Harvey Weinstein's
long career of sexual harassment and intimidation, an investigation which won
him the Pulitzer prize.
Which culminates a long road of indignities for the young
man. Seems the threats from Weinstein's minions to him were not enough. Nor was
the rejection he encountered from assorted media organizations who refused to
run his work until the New Yorker finally picked it up. Nope, the punishment
Farrow endured also extended to House Clinton, which cut him dead.
Which, to the rest of us, seems like a good thing, given their
long history of moral turpitude. But to young Ronan, it was another sling and
arrow, because he was a Democrat and that was his social circle.
“It’s remarkable how quickly even people with a long relationship
with you will turn if you threaten the centres of power or the sources of funding
around them,” Farrow told the Financial Times.
“Ultimately, there are a lot of people out there who operate in
that way. They’re beholden to powerful interests and if you go up against those
interests, you become radioactive very quickly,” he said.
Clinton appointed Farrow as her special adviser on global youth
issues in 2011 when she was secretary of state. Farrow said he had worked with
Clinton “for years” when he was looking into the Weinstein story.
Instead of praising young Ronan for standing up for the
interests of sex-harrassed women, for igniting the #MeToo movement, Hillary,
that supposed big champion of women's progress, shut him out, probably
refusing to take his calls, and in his view, solely on the grounds that
one of her most important moneymen was put out of commission. He was dead to
her.
And that tells us a lot more about Clinton than it does about
Farrow.
It's a reminder of Clinton's pay-to-play orientation, and
privilege-of-kings morality. Rules of decency do not apply to her. Women's
rights, or anyone's rights, are window dressing. Money talks. Maybe that
can be brought up next time someone bruits about her name for president
again.
Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his
women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political
ambitions.
Bill and Hill - and the Evil that Men Do
If you asked one
hundred people what they think about when they hear the name Bill Clinton, a
goodly number will say womanizer, cheater – a few will use the dreadful word
rapist. And that number will increase. Time and neurology are working against
the Clintons.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
People tend to cut
quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh because there’s a lot of
that going around. But Hillary will gain no benefit from that latitude.
Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a
psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions. Before
the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around
her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet,
Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A
majority of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did,
and their legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding
lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
If you asked one
hundred people what they think about when they hear the name Bill Clinton, a
goodly number will say womanizer, cheater – a few will use the dreadful word
rapist. And that number will increase. Time and neurology are working against
the Clintons.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
People tend to cut quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh because there’s a lot of that going around. But Hillary will gain no benefit from that latitude. Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions. Before the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet, Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
Most memory training programs are simply a matter of learning how to associate memories with emotionally charged ideas. This is because the brain is designed to remember where the dangers and the goodies lie and to forget the dry statistics. The brain is more inclined to remember Jennifer Flowers than the unemployment rate in 1996. This effect has tainted the collective memory of many presidents, for example, disclosures about the mistresses of Franklin Delano Roosevelt and John Kennedy. This effect will increase for Bill Clinton both because of the outrageous nature of his conduct and the way it has and will be reported.
People tend to cut quite a bit of slack for the weaknesses of the flesh because there’s a lot of that going around. But Hillary will gain no benefit from that latitude. Everyone knows she stood by her man, blamed his women, and perhaps was a psychological co-rapist for the sake of her political ambitions. Before the next president is elected, Hillary will not only have an albatross around her neck, she will be covered with names like Wellstone, Broaddrick, Moffet, Ward Gracen, Brown, Dowdy, Jones, Ferguson, Zercher, Willey, and more. A majority of those one hundred people will remember the evil the Clintons did, and their legacy will be lost in the folds of tattered dresses and bleeding lips.
Lives -- after them, the good is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with the Clintons.
Hillary Clinton Is not just a sore loser, she is a total loser
As one can readily see, Hillary Clinton has been unable to recover
from having lost the 2016 presidential election -- a self-inflicted wound that
she will never cop to. Or, possibly, an act of divine intervention. She has
come up with well over a dozen reasons for her defeat -- every one but the real
one, i.e. she is a loser -- not just a sore loser, but a total loser. She
is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and criminally corrupt, and
these are her good qualities. In addition, she is bereft of a trace of
integrity or character, has absolutely no judgment, and is devoid of people
skills ( she’s very easy to dislike and distrust and thereby become a member of
her deplorables). The 2016 race was hers to lose, and by failing to listen to
advice on where to campaign, she managed to do just that -- lose! Thank God --
a Hillary Clinton presidency would be the last nail in America’s coffin.
We could go through the litany of Hillary Clinton’s failures –
Cattlegate, Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate, her clumsy and opaque handling of
the health care assignment her husband handed her, her tour of duty in the U.S.
Senate, or her stint at the State Department, starting with her failure to get
the Russian word for “reset” correct and ending with her dereliction of duty in
the case of Benghazi (which produced four dead Americans, including her
“friend” Ambassador Christopher Stevens), which, on testifying before Congress,
she fobbed off with “what difference, at this point, does it make?”
But, for present purposes, I would just like to focus on the liberties
that she has always taken with the truth. When Bill Safire of the New York Times called her a
congenital liar, he flattered her. You see,
the Clintons don’t just tell lies, they live them.
Consider her most recent whopper -- the one in which she observed,
on being asked what was her most difficult decision, that it was remaining in
her marriage. Why was this her biggest whopper? Because she had no choice but
to remain in her marriage, if, indeed, the arrangement that the Clintons have
qualifies as a “marriage,” rather than a political partnership looking to
advance the ambitions of each of the partners.
Some have applauded her incredible loyalty to Bill in view of his
tawdry behavior. However, if all they had was an “arrangement” to advance their
ambitions, his infidelities were irrelevant as far as hurt feelings were
concerned.
But they were necessary to make her both the object of sympathy
(although one has to wonder why you are deserving of pity on your husband’s
1000th marital transgression). Also, every time he got caught, so it goes,
he owed her one. Ergo, the health care assignment, her Senate term, and,
finally, her stint as Secretary of State. In each of these situations
she distinguished herself more for her failures than any accomplishment.
The point here is that Hillary had no choice but to stay in her
marriage. Without her connection to Bill Clinton, Hillary could not be
nominated for, let alone be elected to, dog catcher of even the smallest of
communities. Her successes in securing all of these positions was
achieved by attaching herself to Bill’s coattails and riding them to each one
of these positions.
So why did Hillary lose the 2016 Presidential election? Because
she’s Hillary Clinton, a born loser. And, more to the point, Hillary Clinton
belongs in the Big House, not in the White House.
BILL CLINTON: SERIAL RAPIST and his enabler, Hillary!
MONICA’S VIDEO ON SERIAL RAPIST BILL CLINTON, HUSBAND OF
SWAMP EMPRESS HILLARY CLINTON, CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
Monica Lewinsky says Bill Clinton hinted she should perjure
herself, arranged a farewell Christmas tryst before dumping her
Why is no
one helping or caring about all these women? Who Hillary Viciously went after. The
hypocrisy right now on the left is utterly stunning me. Bill Clinton-12 women
on record telling their stories of him sexually assaulting them starting back
in college! Imagine all the women who still have never told their stories about
him?
Eileen Wellstone (1969)
Allegation: S-exual assault
Anonymous female student at Yale University (1972)
Anonymous female student at the University of Arkansas (1974)
Anonymous female lawyer (1977)
Juanita Broaddrick (1978)
R-ape
Carolyn Moffet (1979)
Elizabeth Ward (1983)
Sally Perdue (1983)
Paula Jones (1991)
Sandra Allen James (1991)
Christy Zercher (1992)
Kathleen Willey (1993)
Monica Lewinsky. 22-year-old intern working for the President
Ronan
Farrow: Bill Clinton ‘Credibly’ Accused of Rape, Investigation Is ‘Overdue’
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2019/11/03/ronan-farrow-bill-clinton-credibly-accused-of-rape-investigation-is-overdue/
3 Nov 20192,510
2:29
Pulitzer
Prize-winning journalist Ronan Farrow said on HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher, that
“credible” accusations of rape had been
made against former President Bill Clinton by Juanita Broaddrick, adding that
an investigation into the allegations is now “overdue.”
Maher asked Farrow, who is
best known for helping uncover the Harvey Weinstein sexual assault scandal,
whether Clinton could have survived in today’s political climate of
hyper-awareness about sexual misconduct.
“I think that it is very important
to interject that Bill Clinton is a different conversation,” responded Farrow.
“He has been credibly accused of rape. That has nothing to do with gray areas.
I think that the Juanita Broaddrick claim has been overdue for revisiting.”
Broaddrick, a former nursing administrator,
first made the allegations against Clinton in 1999, claiming that he raped her
in her hotel room in Little Rock in 1978, when he was Arkansas attorney general
and running for governor. Clinton has denied the allegation through his
attorney.
Farrow recently accused Hillary
Clinton in his best-selling book Catch
and Kill of pressuring him during his investigations into
Harvey Weinstein’s behavior. According to Farrow, Clinton’s publicist Nick
Merrill described the story as “a concern” for her reputation.
Meanwhile,
Maher also pressed Farrow on longtime rumors that he is the son of singer
Frank Sinatra, with his mother Mia Farrow having been romantically involved
with the singer and the pair bearing a strong physical resemblance.
“Now, what do you think your father
would think about what you’re doing now?” Maher asked Farrow, in reference to
his investigative reporting.
“I knew I was walking into that so I
asked,” Farrow said. “I didn’t want to give you the sound-bite of ‘Which one?’”
In
2013, Mia Farrow said in an interview with Vanity Fair that Sinatra could
“possibly” be her son’s biological father.
“I feel like there’s no one more
#MeToo-y than Frank Sinatra,” Maher said, asking. “You do own a mirror, don’t
you?”
Farrow eventually admitted that he
“doesn’t know” what Sinatra would have thought of his journalism, but joked
that Maher could “ask my mom” for answers.
Where were the HOWLERS
when serial rapist Bill Clinton, Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein were on the
prowl?
http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2016/07/30-lies-of-hillary-clinton-and-thats.html
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
Leaked Julian Assange
Message:
Hillary Is A ‘Well Connected,
Sadistic Sociopath’
"But what the
Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the
American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it
to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal.
Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to
every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
Hillary, Billary,
Cosby, Buttman Affleck, Oliver Stone, Harvey Weinstein and their boy Obomb…..
new definitions of
degradation and
sleaze.
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary
Clinton has been exposed as the craven money-grubber she is; money over
morality is the mantra she lives by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN THINKERcom
"But
what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of
the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power,
use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and
venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear
to every person on the planet by now."
---- Patricia McCarthy -
AMERICANTHINKER.com
DO
YOU GET SICK AND TIRED OF HOLLYWOOD’S STAGGERING HYPOCRISY???
RICH LIBERALS AND
THEIR CELEBRATES P IMPS AND PERVS
…. The parasitism
of Hillary, Billary, Obomb, Heffner, Cosby, Buttman
Affleck, Oliver Stone, Weinstein and the rest.
Harvey Weinstein has been exposed in the
media as the sexual predator he is, and Hillary Clinton has been exposed as the
craven money-grubber she is; money over morality is the mantra she lives
by. PATRICIA Mc CARTHY – AMERICAN
THINKERcom
Former
President Bill Clinton speaks during a plenary session at a Clinton Global
Initiative meeting in Marrakech, Morocco, on May 6, 2015. (Abdeljalil
Bounhar/AP Photo)
Bill Clinton Accusers Speak
Out After Ronan Farrow Says Ex-President Was ‘Credibly Accused of Rape’
November 6, 2019 Updated: November 6, 2019
Share
Juanita Broaddrick, who has long accused
former President Bill Clinton of sexual assault, said that she
agrees with comments made by reporter Ronan Farrow.
Farrow wrote
the book “Catch and Kill: Lies, Spies and a Conspiracy to Protect Predators,”
touching on NBC News’ attempts to silence his reporting about Harvey Weinstein.
He told “Real Time with Bill Maher” that Broaddrick had credibly
accused Clinton of rape.
“Bill Clinton is a different conversation.
He has been credibly accused of rape … That is, I think the Juanita Broaddrick
claim has been overdue for revisiting,” he said on Nov. 1.
He was
answering a question from Maher, who asked a panel, “Could Bill Clinton,
if he had done what he did in 1998 survived today? Or would his own party have
thrown him under the bus?”
According to the Daily Caller, three women who have accused Clinton of assault,
including Broaddrick, said they are hoping for justice.
Clinton has
denied all of the allegations.
“I always have
thought that this should be revisited. … I would like for something to be done
in order to expose this man for all of the things that he has done and possibly
get all of his past presidential perks taken from him,” Broaddrick told the
website. “That would be my biggest goal, because I don’t think anything else can
be done after 40 years.”
Broaddrick
said that the allegations of assault never amounted to anything because of the
power he wielded.
“I think it’s
because of who it was,” she said. “[Lauer and others] are all lower characters.
Who should have been exposed was the president of the United States.”
She accused
him of rape when he was campaigning for governor of Arkansas in 1978.
Leslie
Millwee, another Clinton accuser, told the Daily Caller that she was pleased to
hear Farrow’s interest in the allegations.
“I absolutely
agree that it’s long overdue. … I think that more things are going to come to
light,” Millwee said. “I’m really excited that Ronan’s looking into it. I was
sexually assaulted three times by Bill Clinton … and I would not only like for
Juanita to get justice, you know, I’d like to get justice. I’m elated that he’s
looking into this.”
“I don’t care
what your political affiliation is—whether you lean left or right—sexual
assault is bad and wrong and it should be looked at in that way, and nothing to
do with political affiliation,” said Millwee, a former Arkansas reporter.
And Kathleen
Willey, a former aide in the White House, said that she doesn’t believe
Farrow’s interest in the topic will actually lead to charges against Clinton.
“The world
knows that the Clintons have everybody in their back pocket, and I just don’t
know who’s willing to come forward and take something like that on,” she told
the news outlet. “I certainly agree with what Ronan Farrow said. … What
does ‘revisit’ mean? Is the [district attorney] going to look into this? Is the
special counsel?” Willey said. “It’s been 40 years, and I can’t see anybody
picking the ball up and running with it.”
Willey claimed
that Clinton assaulted her in 1993 in the Oval Office while she volunteered as
an aide, according to Business Insider. Clinton denied the allegations.
Millwee alleged that the former president
sexually assaulted her in 1980 several times at the television station where she
worked. She came forward with the allegations in 2016, speaking to Breitbart.
Clinton
eventually was impeached in 1998 by the House of Representatives for lying
under oath and obstruction of justice following the publication of his
relationship with Monica Lewinsky.
The Senate
ultimately acquitted him in 1999 and he served out his second term until
January 2001.
O.K., Prince Andrew's out
of public life. Why isn't Bill Clinton?
The press is making a big deal out of Britain's Prince Andrew now
being ousted from public life, based on his pretty gamy associations with
pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. He had his hand draped around the bare midriff of a
17-year old, in one photo. He kibbitzed with Epstein after his Florida
slap-on-the-wrist conviction and there's a photograph there, too. Flight
records show he rode the Lolita Express. And incredibly, he claims he
never knew anything untoward was going on.
U.K.'s Daily Mail has this comprehensive report, reasonably
explored from a U.K. perspective. But the U.S. press has been all over it,
too. Here's CNN, Washington Post, Vanity Fair, CNBC, Time, Fox News...
It's good clean fun for the American press, given that the British
royal family is unimportant here, and relies on a pristine public image to
maintain U.K. public support which is pretty incompatible with jetting around
with Epstein, but it also raises questions about why that other famous friend
of Epstein's, Bill Clinton, who rode the Lolita Express again, and again, and
again, isn't getting the same pariah treatment. Fact is, the press hasn't
brought the disgusting thing up at all, even as Clinton's wife (and daughter)
gallivant around the country on a thinly disguised campaign for Hillary as
president.
Joe Biden's gotten all kinds of questions based on his son
Hunter's gamy business dealings. But Hillary Clinton remains immune -- and
not a word has been said in the media about hubby Bill, who's still carrying on
his public life as usual. It's as if he's out of the picture, and all those
denials he's thus far made are simply factual ... albeit about as factual
as Prince Andrew's denials.
And there's more than a few indicators that Clinton wasn't
naive at all about Epstein. Though he wasn't accused by Epstein's credible
accuser Virginia Giuffre, Clinton's been accused repeatedly being a sexual
predator by others earlier. Someone like Clinton turning up with Epstein, is pretty
obviously a matter of public interest, particularly with his wife's presidential
ambitions. Just recently, one of Clinton's accusers, Juanita Broaddrick,
gave this interview to Australia's Sky News, bringing up the constant
issues with the much-vaunted Democratic ex-president, and still seeking
justice. She's not getting any so far:
My
interview with Sky News Australia this evening
MeToo
movement "never wanted anything to do with the victims of Bill Clinton” |
Sky News Australia https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6108127574001 …
MeToo movement "never wanted anything to do with the
victims of Bill Clinton” | Sky News Australia
Which brings up again why Clinton isn't getting any attention, let
alone ostracization, on his well-known relationship with Epstein. Why not? The
Brit press is interested in British angles, the American press should be
similarly interested in American angles. But only Prince Andrew gets the full
press attention. Maybe that's because he's not a Democrat to protect?
It just shows the press's credibility problem in conveniently
attempting to protect another Democrat from any uncomfortable questions.
Is someone gonna ask the
Clintons about all those trips to Epstein's 'cowboy village'?
The press is piling on against the U.K.'s
Prince Andrew, who's been probably credibly accused of participating in
"suicide" pervert Jeffrey Epstein's sex-with-little-girls operations.
Yes, it's wretched and
appalling. It's bad for a royal family that for decades has
portrayed itself as the embodiment of middle-class values. This
is Shaka Zulu or Genghis Khan territory.
But it's also of limited interest, given
that Prince Andrew is not even important in the royal succession lineup, and
frankly, who cares what some rich overseas princeling is up
to? The media sure didn't, up until now.
There's likely a reason for it — to
deflect attention from the growing evidence that Bill, Hillary, and
even Chelsea Clinton have had a pretty spectacularly intense association
with the very same pervert.
The Daily Mail has been on the job and has
found another credible witness, a former contractor of Epstein's at his
New Mexico "cowboy village" ranch who says the Clintons jetted in
annually on Epstein's Lolita Express and had a grand old time on Epstein's
many-camera'ed grounds. Some opening points from the Mail:
- Bill and Hillary
Clinton would stay at Jeffrey Epstein's New Mexico ranch frequently after
they left the White House, former estate workers told DailyMailTV
- The former president
was Epstein's closest 'celebrity mate' and the Clintons visited Zorro
Ranch 'a whole bunch of times', a former contractor who ran the IT system
at the property said
- The family never
stayed in the main house but bunked down in a special cowboy-themed
village created by Epstein, which lies a mile south of his own villa,
sources said
- The guest homes are
next to other traditional Wild West-style buildings such as an old
schoolhouse and saloon bar, which are all near Epstein's private airstrip,
where he arrived on his private planes
And to read the details of the report is
enough to give the gross-outs to anyone. Why were the Clintons going
to a place Epstein called his "baby-making ranch"? What
was that about Epstein having an eight-person "party
shower"? Did the Clintons do the "party
shower"? Was it on film? How many
times? And who else was in the pen with
them? What about that party room with the stripper
poles? Did the Clintons go there, too? What was the
Secret Service thinking, or did Bill bug out again on his Secret
Service? And why are taxpayers paying for this farce?
Why again did Epstein have that icky
portrait of Bill Clinton wearing a blue dress on his Manhattan mansion wall?
'My contact
was Brice, their main concern was that there was no video surveillance on the
property at all. I thought this was a simple request, as they wanted
surveillance to protect their investment. It's a huge site.
'But what was
weird was that the whole time I was on site, Brice would be bragging about how
the Clintons would visit, the whole family. Not just Bill, but Bill, his wife,
their kid, and they would stay on the ranch itself.
More ickiness about Epstein's obsession
with cameras:
Instead of
using an expensive, robust camera system, which used underground cables, he
wanted a 'point-to-point wireless fluid mesh design', which means cameras are
operating via antenna, and is considerably cheaper.
After Kellogg
did an estimate and sent in a plan, he never heard back.
He said:
'They had this huge facility, but it felt like they didn't have the money to do
anything. They were trying to find the most cost-effective way to transmit
video footage and we had to come up with a point-to-point wireless fluid mesh
design because normally we want to trench everything. It saves money as you
don't have to build a trench and put in a cable.
Sound like someone who's been
blackmailed? You decide.
Now, arguably, one could argue that the
press is saying nothing about this, given that the contractor was a different
kind of witness from Virginia Giuffre, the credible young woman who says
Epstein trafficked her with Prince Andrew when she was a teenager.
But the Mail slips in something that
hasn't appeared significantly in the press at all: that Giuffre also says she
saw Bill Clinton at Epstein's pervert haunts being honored by the pedophile
himself.
Why aren't the media covering
that? Now we have the Clintons pinned at two places — the
"cowboy ranch" and the Caribbean pervert island — and no one's saying
anything. It's all about Prince Andrew.
Yet Eptein was obsessed with cameras and
obviously blackmail. He roped in Prince Andrew. But the
real question is to what extent he got the Clintons. With all these
new revelations rolling out, why is the press silent?
Image
credit: Photo montage by Monica Showalter from public domain sources.
Convicted sex offender and Mueller witness
George Nader indicted for illegal contributions to boost Hillary Clinton
Convicted sex offender George Nader, who was a key witness in
special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation, has been indicted by
United States prosecutors for his alleged role in a scheme to conceal large
sums of illegal campaign contributions to help Hillary Clinton in the 2016
election.
Nader, a 60-year-old Lebanese American lobbyist, is accused of
conspiring with Ahmad “Andy” Khawaja, the Los Angeles-based 48-year-old chief
executive of Allied Wallet, to conceal the source of more than $3.5 million in
campaign contributions to political committees associated with a presidential
candidate to gain influence during and after the 2016 campaign.
Nader and Khawaja were charged on Nov. 7 as part of a 53-count
indictment dealt by a federal grand jury in the District of Columbia. The
indictment was unsealed on Tuesday.
Khawaja gave more than $4 million to Clinton's campaign and
other Democrats during the 2016 cycle but later donated $1 million to President
Trump's inaugural committee after Clinton lost, according to the Associated Press. As he shifted his focus to Republicans after the 2016
election, the Lebanese-born Khawaja met with Trump at a Manhattan fundraiser
and got a photo with the president in the Oval Office.
The Justice Department announced on Tuesday that Khawaja
allegedly conspired with Nader to make $3.5 million in straw donations to boost
a presidential candidate from March 2016 through January 2017.
No candidate is mentioned by name, but the indictment and
campaign finance records make it clear that the money was directed towards
helping Clinton during the 2016 campaign.
"By design, these contributions appeared to be in the names
of Khawaja, his wife, and his company. In reality, they allegedly were funded
by Nader," Assistant Attorney General Brian Benczkowski of the Justice
Department’s Criminal Division and FBI Washington Field Office chief Timothy
Slater announced in a statement.
"Khawaja and Nader allegedly made these contributions in an
effort to gain influence with high-level political figures, including the
candidate. As Khawaja and Nader arranged these payments, Nader allegedly
reported to an official from a foreign government about his efforts to gain
influence," they continued.
According to the indictment, after the election Khawaja used his company to steer $1
million to Trump's inaugural committee and attended Trump's inauguration with
Nader.
The other charges in the indictment allege Khawaja and six
associates — Roy Boulos, Rudy Dekermenjian, Mohammad “Moe” Diab, Rani El-Saadi,
Stevan Hill, and Thayne Whipple — conspired to conceal executive contributions,
totaling more than $1.8 million, to various political committees in 2016
through 2018. "Among other things, these contributions allegedly allowed
Khawaja to host a private fundraiser for a presidential candidate in 2016 and a
private fundraising dinner for an elected official in 2018," Benczkowski
and Slater said.
Khawaja is also charged with obstructing the grand jury
investigation in the summer by providing a witness called to testify in the
case with false information about Nader and his connection to Khawaja’s
company, while four of his associates are charged with obstruction by lying to
the FBI.
Nader is already in federal custody on other charges. In July,
he was charged with
sex trafficking for allegedly transporting a 14-year-old boy from Europe and
then abusing him. Nader pleaded not guilty in federal court in Alexandria,
Virginia.
Part of a rap sheet dating to the 1980s, Nader pleaded guilty in
1991 to a federal child porn charge involving footage of 13- or 14-year-old
boys and received a six-month sentence, served at a Baltimore halfway house.
Nader acted as a connection between Trump’s circle and Russian,
United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabian officials in 2016 and 2017 as he
pursued business deals in the Middle East. This included helping to set up a
January 2017 meeting in the Seychelles between Trump associate and Blackwater
founder Erik Prince and a Russian official with close ties to Russian President
Vladimir Putin.
As reported by the Washington Examiner, records indicate Nader visited the White House at least 13
times to meet with Trump’s then-chief strategist Steve Bannon.
Nader was interviewed by Mueller's team on multiple occasions
regarding possible UAE efforts to influence members of Trump's campaign, and was mentioned in
Mueller's final report more than 100 times.
An attorney for Nader declined
to comment to the Washington
Post, and an attorney for Khawaja could not immediately be reached by the
outlet.
Federal Election Commission records detail the
millions of dollars Khawaja admitted donating to Democratic candidates,
campaigns, and political action committees.
Khawaja told the Federal Election Commission he donated $2,700
in October 2015 and $2,700 in July 2016 to Clinton’s 2016 presidential
campaign, Hillary for America. He said he donated $135,000 in March 2016,
$150,000 in April 2016, $68,400 in June 2016, and $60,000 in September 2016 to
the Clinton campaign’s joint fundraising committee, the Hillary Victory Fund.
The records also show a donation totaling $200,400 in July 2016 to the Hillary
Action Fund, a joint fundraising effort between Clinton’s campaign and the
Democratic National Committee.
Khawaja told the FEC about donations to the DNC totaling
$231,100, in addition to donations to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign
Committee totaling $33,400 in 2016 and $43,900 in 2017 and the Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee totaling $233,400 in 2016, $230,000 in 2017,
and $237,300 in 2018.
Khawaja also reported donating massive sums to liberal PACs,
including $1,100,000 to Priorities USA Action, the primary super PAC supporting
Clinton's campaign, and $100,000 to Senate Majority PAC in 2016. He also
donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to Senate and congressional races
around the country with a special focus on his home state of California,
including $4,200 in 2016 and $3,900 in 2017 to Schiff for Congress, the
campaign committee for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff.
In addition, Khawaja’s company, Allied Wallet, reported giving
$550,000 to the Philadelphia 2016 Host Committee, the Democratic National
Convention’s fundraising arm, in July 2016. The business also donated hundreds
of thousands of dollars to Democratic super PACs in 2017 and 2018.
FEC records show Nader reported giving $595 in donations to
Trump’s presidential campaign committee in 2016, as well as $100 dollars to Ben
Carson's campaign, but not to any Democrats that election cycle.
Nader was a business associate of Elliott Broidy, a top Republican fundraiser and deputy
finance chairman of the Republican National Committee who resigned from
that position in April 2018 after reports that Trump lawyer Michael Cohen
negotiated a $1.6 million settlement in 2017 between Broidy and a former
Playboy model who said Broidy impregnated her. Nader and Broidy worked to influence U.S.
foreign policy in the Middle East prior to Broidy's resignation and Nader's
arrest in June.
Is that you, Bill Clinton?
New book says Epstein blackmailed politicians
Jeffrey Epstein was a bizarre
creep. Not only was he a pedophile, but he seemed to be drawn to
pulling in famous people to his pedophilery, in the interests of blackmail.
A new book lays out how strange it was,
stating that Epstein got his entire spy operation from the media empire of the
late Robert Maxwell, a sleazy tabloid-media character who was Epstein
girlfriend Ghislane Maxwell's father, and who died under mysterious
circumstances himself on his yacht, years ago. Apparently, he was
useful to the Mossad for blackmailing politicians, so they all had some kind of
relationship, and Epstein, a pedophile, was brought in. Here's an
interesting review with excerpts from Medium:
According to
the former spy, the ultimate order to embrace Epstein and involve him in the
ongoing arms deals came from "the bosses" at Israeli intelligence
headquarters.
"They
were agents of the Israeli Intelligence Services," he told James
Robertson.
"Later
on [Ghislaine] got involved with Israeli intelligence together with him. But
not in this arms deal with Iran business," Ben-Menashe also told Zev Shalev,
former CBS News executive producer and investigative journalist for the
website Narativ.
"These
guys were seen as agents. They weren't really competent to do very much. And so
they found a niche for themselves — blackmailing American and other political
figures."
He told
Robertson, "Mr. Epstein was the simple idiot who was going around providing
girls to all kinds of politicians in the United States. See, f------ around is
not a crime. It could be embarrassing, but it's not a crime. But f------ a
fourteen-year-old girl is a crime. And he was taking photos of politicians
f------ fourteen-year-old girls — if you want to get it straight. They would
just blackmail people, they would just blackmail people like that."
This, if true, tells us two things: that
Epstein was able to get away from the long arm of the law due to politics, but
he also may have had some nefarious sway over a lot of politicians, what with
his tabloid spy ties via House Maxwell and, apparently, the Israeli spy
apparat, too.
So imagine a guy like Bubba Clinton
strolling into this and indulging his enormous appetites, and not a clue as to
the forces circling him.
If even a scintilla of this is what was
going on, there may be forces out there with the wherewithal to rub out Epstein
in his prison, as well as hold enormous sway over many gullible and immoral
Western politicians.
It once again raises questions as to where
Bill Clinton was in all this. He's intersected the Epstein world all
too often for something of this nature not to ensnare. And with a
compliant media establishment, he's still getting away with saying nothing was
going on.
Image credit:
Photo illustration by Monica Showalter from public domain sources.
How Stupid Do They Think
We Are?
These days it seems like coincidence
abounds in the precincts of leftism. And an unquestioning Deep State Media are
only too happy to label anyone who points out the absurdities of the supposed
coincidences as “conspiracy theorists,” having long ago abandoned journalistic
inquisitiveness for allegiance to a political ideology.
A few examples spring to mind:
Jeffrey Epstein’s supposed suicide; a “chance” encounter on June 27, 2016
on the tarmac of Phoenix’s Sky Harbor International Airport between
then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton, whose
wife would be interviewed by FBI agents over her illegal email server five days
later; and the failure by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz to find
“political bias” in the initiation of the Obama administration’s
outrageous and utterly illegal spying operation on the Trump presidential
campaign and presidency.
Take the case of the “suicide” of Jeffrey
Epstein. There’s a reason the phrase “Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself”
being tacked onto otherwise disconnected topics by people making public
statements became a hilarious meme for a while. At the core of all good humor
is an unspoken truth. It was a populist way of saying, “We’re not buying what
you fake news media types are selling anymore.” And the flat-footed responses
of the Deep State Media reporters confronted by these unexpected “Jeffrey
Epstein didn’t kill himself” truth bombs were the best part of all.
At an LSU-Alabama football game that
President Trump attended, MSNBC reporter Monica Alba asked a Trump-voting student on live television, “What [Trump] policies stand out to
you?” The young man gamely replied, without cracking a smile or missing a beat,
“Just mainly the no-nonsense policies and especially since Jeffrey Epstein
didn’t kill himself.” Alba visibly had difficulty maintaining her
composure but being part of today’s toadying Fourth Estate that must protect
the Clintons at all cost, dutifully ignored the student’s non sequitur tweak
and edto another question.
MSNBC REPORTER: “What [Trump] policies stand out to you?”
ALABAMA STUDENT: “Just mainly the no nonsense policies and especially since Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself.”
ALABAMA STUDENT: “Just mainly the no nonsense policies and especially since Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself.”
She
gets the joke, but knows she can’t acknowledge it, as the word has gone out to
the entire corporate media class that no one is allowed to question the
circumstances of the death of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who was as thick as thieves
with Bill Clinton.
And
the circumstances of Epstein’s supposed “suicide” are so outrageously
questionable that any sentient person looking at the facts would have to have
undergone a lobotomy not to conclude that a giant scam and cover-up occurred in
relation to his death. But Epstein’s ability to expose rich and powerful
liberals like Mr. Clinton, Prince Andrew and who knows how many others in his
web of sexual perversion meant that the Bat Signal had to go out to Deep State
Media members everywhere that no discussion of the possible murder of Epstein
could be tolerated.
Consider
the “coincidences” and anomalies that took place in Epstein’s final days and
hours. Here you have the most high-profile criminal defendant in the United
States, who had explosively damaging information on sexual predations involving
perhaps scores or hundreds of the world’s most elite and powerful occurring
aboard Epstein’s private 727 jet dubbed “The Lolita Express,” at his Caribbean
estate wags nicknamed “Orgy Island,” at his sprawling New Mexico would-be baby
farm, and at his Manhattan manse.
He
finally ends up in jail at Manhattan’s Metropolitan Correctional Center in the
custody of the federal Bureau of Prisons. He then supposedly attempted to kill
myself but survived, yet was taken off suicide watch after only six days. Then
lo and behold, both guards assigned to check on him fell asleep –
simultaneously – and missed their rounds, both cameras trained on the area
around Epstein’s cell failed, simultaneously, and the night before his death,
Epstein’s one cellmate inexplicably was removed from the cell.
After
his body was found on August 10, 2019, an autopsy performed by the city’s Chief
Medical Examiner’s office determined the cause of death to be suicide after
only five days, even before all of the evidence has been collected. Famed
pathologist Dr. Michael Baden, who attended the autopsy at the behest of
Epstein’s brother, gave a must-see interview to Fox News. He
noted that the three bones fractured in Epstein’s neck were indicative of
homicide, not suicide. Baden said that Epstein’s neck “had been crushed.” It
was not the result of a ligature (like a noose made from bedsheets), as was
claimed. He noted the scene of the death appeared staged to suggest suicide.
Yet,
the Deep State Media pushed the suicide narrative nonetheless, pooh-poohing
anyone who suggested otherwise. They attacked the esteemed Dr. Baden for
questioning the Epstein autopsy, with New York Magazine describing him as
having “demi-celebrity status” and being fond of “self-aggrandizement.” Never
mind the fact pattern he points to that is wildly divergent from a “suicide”
determination. But this is our corporatist media today. Accept the Deep State
narrative and move on.
Then
we have Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton “bumping into” each other at the
culmination of the FBI’s pseudo-investigation into Hillary Clinton’s
outrageously criminal conduct in running highly classified government records
over a ridiculously unsecure personal server, surely in violation of the
Espionage Act and Federal Records Act, if not other laws.
The
advance planning that goes into the travel of both a former president and a
current Attorney General by their protective details and logistics personnel is
immense. Two such officials do not simply have their respective airplanes sidle
up to each other on the tarmac of an airport like you might bump into an old
high school chum at Starbucks. The impropriety of the Attorney General meeting
privately with the spouse of the subject of a high-profile FBI investigation
was off the charts. But, we were told, they just discussed golf outings
and grandchildren. Nothing to see here either folks. And the likes of CNN dutifully reported that it was only
congressional Republicans who saw fit to question the circumstances.
And
finally, we have DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz testifying to the Senate that, “We found no
bias” on the part of those who initiated the counterintelligence operation
targeting the Trump campaign, called Operation Crossfire Hurricane. His report
itself said, “We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that
political bias or improper motivation influenced his decision [to open an
investigation surveilling the Trump campaign].”
One
might reasonably ask: When top FBI lawyer and principal in Operation Crossfire
Hurricane, Lisa Page, says in an August 2016 text to fellow Crossfire Hurricane
principal, FBI official Peter Strzok, that Trump is “not ever going to become
president, right? Right?!” And Strzok responds “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop
it,” isn’t that perhaps documentary evidence of a political bias?
Perhaps
Mr. Horowitz was looking for an FBI “To Do List” entitled “Steps We Will Take
to Undermine the Presidential Candidacy of Donald J. Trump” and came up blank.
Nonetheless,
the Deep State Media, like NBC News, dutifully and
breathlessly declared in its headline on the story: “Internal Justice watchdog
finds that Russia probe was justified, not biased against Trump.”
A
representative republic is severely impaired, indeed threatened, when its
constitutionally protected watchdogs in the Fourth Estate abandon their most
basic critical faculties in favor of advancing the agenda of their preferred
political party. Eventually, the absurdities they foist upon a skeptical
populace lead inevitably to their deserved reputation as discredited Deep State
handmaidens, not to be believed.
William F. Marshall has been an
intelligence analyst and investigator in the government, private, and
non-profit sectors for more than 30 years. He is a senior investigator for
Judicial Watch, Inc., and a contributor to Townhall, American Thinker, and The Federalist. (The views expressed are the
author’s alone, and not necessarily those of Judicial Watch.)
We know Biden has roaming hands, but how far have they roamed?
Before you
even begin to read this post, remember what Hillary Clinton, the voice of the left
in 2015, said about sexual assault allegations: "Every survivor of sexual
assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported." With
that fixed in your mind, it's time to talk about Joe Biden.
The #MeToo
movement in America reached the top of its crescendo in 2017. The
diminuendo phase happened soon after, when it seemed as if every Democrat man
in America, especially in Hollywood and the media, had been playing fast and loose
with women, even while pandering to feminists.
Up until
spring 2019, when he began his presidential run, Joe Biden seemed
immune. That was when Lucy Flores, a Bernie Sanders–supporter,
claimed that, in 2014, when he was still vice president, Joe Biden touched her
inappropriately and kissed her head at a campaign rally. In other
words, she claimed that he did to her what he did to the women and girls in
this video:
Biden denied
the accusation. And because Biden seemed like the best hope to beat
President Trump, he got a pass. (Recall that back in 1998, feminist
reporter Nina Burleigh said of Clinton, "I would be happy to give him
a blowjob just to thank him for keeping abortion
legal." Politics before principles...)
Tara Reade,
however, believed Flores's claims. To support Flores, she went
public with her own story about the time that Biden had "put his hand on
my shoulder and run his finger up my neck." However, because
Reade was threatening the man who would save America from Trump, the Democrats
threw at her the worst insult they could think of, calling her a Putin puppet. Reade retreated.
As the
Democrat Party began to consolidate around Biden, Reade decided that, for her
daughter's sake, it was time to tell the whole story about Joe. She
reached out to Time's Up, a post-#MeToo organization that was established to
help survivors of sexual assault and harassment tell their
stories. Because Reade supported Sanders, Time's Up bowed out of
helping her. The organization was afraid that doing supporting
her would look like a political act and threaten its non-profit
standing. Additionally, Reade had written nice things about Putin,
which gave credence to the charge that she was a Russian operative.
Eventually,
Reade found her way to Katie Halper, a podcaster and journalist who often works
with Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi (one of the last honest left-leaning
journalists). On Wednesday, Katie Halper released a short excerpt of a more extended interview
with Reade. In the excerpt, Reade gives graphic details about what
Biden allegedly did to her in 1993.
According to
Reade, she was working in Joe Biden's office in 1993. Her supervisor
asked that she deliver a gym bag to Biden. Reade reached Biden just
as he was finishing a conversation with someone, after which they were alone.
Suddenly,
Biden pushed Reade up against a wall, slithered his hand down the outside of
her skirt and up the inside, and then thrust his fingers, not just into her
underwear, but into her. At the same time, he started kissing her
and asking her if she wanted to go somewhere else.
Reade's body
language must have alerted Biden to the fact that, no, she didn't want to go
somewhere else, for Biden pulled away. He then said
either, "Come on, man. I heard you liked me" or, perhaps,
"Come on, man. I thought you liked me."
Reade was
shattered. Up until then, she'd admired Biden, whom she considered a
father figure, for he was the same age as her father. More than
that, "[h]e was, like, this champion of women's rights in my eyes, and I
couldn't believe it was happening. It seemed surreal."
Even worse
than the assault, said Reade, was what Biden did when it was
over. "He took his finger. He just, like, pointed at
me and said, 'You're nothing to me.'" And at that moment, Reade
truly felt like nothing. While she told her brother and a close
friend what happened immediately after the event, she remained silent until
Flores's words, and the treatment meted out to Flores, caused her to act.
Keeping in
mind Hillary Clinton's words, which were the mantra of the Democrat Party until
too many Democrat men got hit by them, Reade must be believed. And
frankly, listening to her, she sounds believable, not least because it's so
easy to envision gropey, arrogant, hair-sniffing Biden being gropey and
arrogant with Reade — and then calling her "man," as he does everyone
else.
Hillary
Clinton speaks in Baltimore on June 5, 2017. (Patrick Semansky/AP Photo)
Hillary Clinton on Women
Uncomfortable With Biden Touching Them: ‘Get Over It’
September 30, 2019 Updated: September 30, 2019
Former first
lady, secretary of state, and presidential contender Hillary Clinton dismissed women and
girls who have expressed how uncomfortable they became when touched by former
vice president and current presidential hopeful Joe Biden.
Clinton, 71,
was with her daughter Chelsea Clinton, 39, promoting the new book they wrote
together.
“For goodness’
sake, I’m sorry, I have to jump in because I’ve heard a little bit about that,”
Clinton told People magazine. “I mean, I don’t think that the Twitterverse is the American
electorate, but there are lots of vocal voices that say all kinds of things.”
She said
Biden, 76, “is a thoroughly decent human being who has served our country
honorably and well for decades.”
“You could
take any person who sticks their little head above the parapet and says, ‘I’m
going to run for president,’ and find something that … a little annoying habit
or other kind of behavior that people are going to pick apart and disagree
with,” she continued.
Today's News Updates
Biden for
years has come under scrutiny for his physical contact that includes repeatedly
touching women and girls he comes into contact with, although some women, like Stephanie Carter, have defended him.
Support our independent journalism and donate a 'Coffee' now.
On the other
side, former Nevada lieutenant governor candidate Lucy Flores wrote an essay in
March describing a 2014 interaction with Biden, who attended a political event
to endorse Flores.
She said Biden
came up behind her and put his hands on her shoulders before leaning in and
inhaling her hair.
“I was
mortified,” she wrote. “I thought to myself … ‘What in the actual [expletive]?
Why is the vice-president of the United States smelling my hair?'”
She was
embarrassed and shocked, she wrote, and even more so when he kissed the back of
her head, leaving her temporarily paralyzed.
“He made me
feel uneasy, gross, and confused. The vice-president of the United States of
America had just touched me in an intimate way reserved for close friends,
family, or romantic partners—and I felt powerless to do anything about it,”
Flores wrote.
Biden released
a statement saying he’d never acted inappropriately.
Social norms are
changing. I understand that, and I’ve heard what these women are saying.
Politics to me has always been about making connections, but I will be more
mindful about respecting personal space in the future. That’s my responsibility
and I will meet it.
“In my many
years on the campaign trail and in public life, I have offered countless
handshakes, hugs, expressions of affection, support and comfort,” Biden said.
“And not once—never—did I believe I acted inappropriately. If it is suggested I
did so, I will listen respectfully. But it was never my intention. I may not
recall these moments the same way, and I may be surprised at what I hear.”
Biden said in
a Twitter video he would change his behavior, citing changing social norms, but
soon after touched a 10-year-old while at a campaign event.
Soon after,
several other women, including 43-year-old Amy Lappos, said Biden touched them
inappropriately.
Lappos said
Biden grabbed her during a 2009 fundraiser.
“It wasn’t
sexual, but he did grab me by the head,” Lappos said. “He put his hand around my neck and pulled me in to rub noses with me.
When he was pulling me in, I thought he was going to kiss me on the mouth.”
In a Facebook
post, she blasted people who think the “grossness of men invading women’s
boundaries to sniff and touch is debatable.”
No comments:
Post a Comment