Monday, February 1, 2021

REVOLUTION SPREADS ACROSS RUSSIAN - DICTATOR OF SYRIA OFFERS PUTIN ASYLUM

 

Thousands of Navalny supporters rally across Russia despite fierce crackdown

Nataliya Vasilyeva
Updated 
Mr Navalny and his allies had called on supporters to rally against the 'lawless' Kremlin  - Ap
Mr Navalny and his allies had called on supporters to rally against the 'lawless' Kremlin - Ap

Thousands are rallying across Russia as nationwide protests in support of jailed opposition leader Alexei Navalny continue to grow.

For the second straight weekend, Russians took to the streets on Sunday in the Far East and Siberia as Moscow geared up for the rally with a strict security lockdown.

Defying minus 20 degrees temperatures, more than 6,000 people marched across Russia’s third-largest city of Novosibirsk on Sunday, chanting “Down with the czar!” after riot police sealed off the main square.

In Vladivostok on the Pacific Ocean, police pushed the crowds on the frozen Amur Bay where officers chased protesters in the snow.

More than 500 arrests were reported across the country by Sunday morning.

Police officers detain a man during the Moscow protest on Sunday  - AP
Police officers detain a man during the Moscow protest on Sunday - AP

Last Saturday saw the country’s biggest wave of public discontent with the Kremlin in a decade as more than protesters in more than 130 cities took to the streets to protest Mr Navalny’s arrest.

The politician, who earlier this month returned to Russia for the first time since he was poisoned, was jailed for 30 days for violating terms of his suspended sentence in an impromptu hearing that caused outcry even among many apolitical Russians.

Emboldened by last weekend’s strong showing, Mr Navalny’s allies called on opposition supporters to rally on Sunday on Lubyanka Square, an iconic location in central Moscow which is also home to the headquarters of the formidable FSB agency where President Vladimir Putin began his career when it was part of the KGB.

Moscow authorities mounted unprecedented security measures ahead of the rally, shutting down eight underground stations, diverting a dozen bus routes and closing off several central streets in a security lockdown not seen since violent civil disturbances in 1993.

In St Petersburg, the Ekho Moskvy radio station reported that the entire Nevsky prospekt, the city’s main street was entirely blocked and all underground stations in the centre were shut down.

The protests were also spurred by Mr Navalny’s bombshell investigation that came out the day after he was locked up.

In a sleek YouTube video, Mr Navalny exposed a billion-pound property on the Black Sea as President Putin’s secret palace financed by his friends’ slush fund.


Putin's Palace


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2P154dMR_c


Navalny reveals investigation into ‘Putin's Palace’ | DW News

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8J2dW-QYQY


Putin's palace. History of world's largest bribe

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipAnwilMncI

Political crisis in Russia deepens as Navalny protests continue

Renewed protests in support of jailed opposition leader Alexei Navalny drew several tens of thousands of people on Sunday. Demonstrations took place in at least 80 Russian cities. In an indication of extreme nervousness and concern about the protests, the Kremlin again cracked down violently: over 4,000 people were arrested, and entire Moscow subway stations were shut down for the duration of the protests.

Navalny is set to appear before a court on Tuesday on charges of breaching the terms of probation for an indictment of fraud in 2014. He may be sentenced to up to three and a half years in prison.

Sunday’s protests were reportedly smaller than the previous week ’s. As before, all slogans were confined to demanding the release of Navalny, and calling for Putin to be removed. The protests have drawn support from various political forces, including monarchist tendencies, far-right nationalist formations and pseudo-left tendencies such as the Pabloite Russian Socialist Movement.

Alexei Navalny [Wikimedia Commons]

The Stalinist Communist Party of Russia (KPRF), which has long been a key prop of the Putin regime, is widely reported to be on the verge of a split because of Navalny. The online outlet Gazeta.Ru has noted that “chaos” was reigning within the party. Its official head, Gennady Zyuganov, continues to support Putin and denounces Navalny as a “foreign agent”, while a growing wing around Valery Rashkin is openly rallying behind Navalny. The Stalinist United Communist Party of Russia (OKP) of Daria Mitina, whom the World Socialist Web Site has exposed as an agent of the Kremlin several years ago, has also officially endorsed the protests.

The Russian Foreign Ministry has issued a statement on Facebook, accusing the US of fostering these protests as part of a strategy that had been laid out by a 2019 report by the RAND Corporation, a think tank that has historically exerted significant influence on the foreign policy of Washington. The report proposed a combination of a series of foreign, military, economic and domestic political provocations as part of “a campaign designed to unbalance the adversary, leading Russia to compete in domains or regions where the United States has a competitive advantage, and causing Russia to overextend itself militarily or economically or causing the regime to lose domestic and/or international prestige and influence.”

There is no question that both US and German imperialism have been bolstering these protests and Navalny, in particular, in an effort to destabilize the Putin regime. Navalny is an extremely right-wing figure with well-documented ties to Washington and Russia’s far-right—ties which he never renounced nor tried to hide. The entire story of the “poisoning” of Navalny by the Kremlin, which has been broadly propagated by the bourgeois press in the West, has been shot through with glaring contradictions .

The video that allegedly exposes a palace on the Black Sea owned by Putin was shot while Navalny was in Germany and has now been watched by over 100 million people. With the video, Navalny and his imperialist backers no doubt tried to tap into the enormous anger about staggering levels of social inequality. The Kremlin has tried to contain the fall-out from the video by arguing that Arkadi Rotenberg, a widely hated oligarch and judo partner of Putin, owned the palace.

The political crisis in Russia, the growing divisions within the oligarchy and the state, can only be understood within its broader historical and international context. As across the world, the COVID-19 pandemic has deeply destabilized Russian society. The Putin regime, which has pursued a policy of “herd immunity” like its counterparts internationally, bears full responsibility for tens of thousands of dea ths and the social devastation of tens of millions. Overall, half a million people have lost their lives last year in Russia, the most significant population loss in 15 years.

This social and human devastation has come on top of and has been exacerbated by decades of austerity, the destruction of the health care system and other social services, and the general immiseration of the population in the aftermath of the Stalinist dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. Health care workers in Russia have died in much larger numbers than in most other countries because of the lack of personal protective equipment and generally poor working conditions.

According to official numbers, 4.4 million people were unemployed last year, a growth of almost 25 percent (or 1 million people) relative to 2019. Over half of these receive no unemployment benefits whatsoever, leaving these millions and their families to their own fate. A pathetic program by the Labor Ministry that was just announced promises to reinstate just 400,000 of these into some form of employment. At least 19.6 million people out of a population of 140 million now officially count as poor.

This number no doubt represents a gross underestimation of the levels of social despair that prevail in the overwhelming majority of the working class. Over a third of workers reported income losses, and 15 percent had income losses of at least 20 percent. Given the poverty wages most workers have earned before the pandemic, such income losses have been devastating for millions. A significant number of pensioners and workers are unable to afford to buy food in stores, instead forced to provide for their nutrition by collecting mushrooms in the forest and growing vegetables on their own.

At the same time, the richest 1 percent in Russia were able to increase the wealth concentrated in their hands during the pandemic to 50 percent, well above the international average of 44 percent. Even before the pandemic, Russia had become the most unequal large economy in the world: in 2017, the centenary year of the October Revolution, the richest 10 percent of Russians owned 89 percent of the country’s wealth. The ten richest oligarchs in 2020 owned a combined wealth of $151.6 billion. There is enormous social and political anger within broad layers of the working population, not just about the Putin regime, but the existing social system as a whole.

Under these conditions, it is no coincidence that the term “capitalism” has been entirely banned from every article and statement on the Navalny protests. The issue of Putin’s personal wealth is portrayed by the bourgeois media and Navalny’s political supporters as the fault of an individual and his “corruption,” not as the outcome of the restoration of capitalism. Meanwhile, the fact that one of the biggest looting operations in history took place last March with the massive bailout of the major corporations—a bailout for which workers have paid with their lives in the “back-to-work-campaign”, while individuals like Elon Musk could accumulate over $185 billion—is never mentioned. The same objective dynamic—the need to extract surplus value from the working class to ensure the profits of the ruling class—also underlay the back-to-work campaign in Russia and the premature reopening of factories.

What all the political forces which dominate in Russia now have in common, whether they rally around Putin or Navalny, is their unwavering support for capitalism and extreme nationalism. What they fear the most is an intervention of the working class into social and political life on an independent and internationalist basis. Such an intervention, however, is on the agenda and has, in fact, begun to emerge in the US and internationally. The critical question now is to prepare it politically through the assimilation of the record of the Trotskyist movement which opposed the Stalinist betrayal of the October Revolution of 1917, and the fight for a section of the International Committee of the Fourth International in Russia.


SOCIOPATH BRIBES SUCKING LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS PREACHES WE NEED 'VALUE LIFE' UNLESS WE CAN ABORT IT FIRST!

 

Does Church Fund Kamala Harris? And Her Other Shady Shenanigans

https://kamala-harris-sociopath.blogspot.com/2020/09/the-case-of-corrupt-california-lawyer.html

During her decade-and-a-half tenure as a chief prosecutor, Harris would fail to prosecute a single case of priest abuse and her office would strangely hide vital records on abuses that had occurred despite the protests of victims groups. PETER SCHWEIZER

She somehow served as San Francisco district attorney from 2004 to 2011, and then as California attorney general from 2011 to 2017, and never brought a single documented case forward against an abusive priest. PETER SCHWEIZER

According to San Francisco election financial disclosures, high-dollar donations to Harris’s campaign began to roll in from those connected to the Catholic Church institutional hierarchy.” PETER SCHEIZER

“However, I would like to encourage my fellow Democrats to approach Senator Harris with a healthy dose of skepticism. As a prosecutor and California State Attorney General, Harris has engaged in blatantly unethical behavior for her profession and embraced positions that actively hurt her constituents.” JESSER HOROWITZ

 

Harris has often been described as a "politician on the make," someone who will do whatever is expedient.  Writing for RealClearPolitics, Debra Saunders calls Harris a "progressive opportunist."  Yves Smith, looking through her less than progressive record as California prosecutor, would alter that to "opportunist to the core." JEFFREY FOLKS

The best-case scenario is that she’s a progressive who repeatedly violated her own principles so that she could promote her career. In the worst-case scenario, she’s just another corrupt, rotten, regressive prosecutor. JESSER HOROWITZ

How come you wouldn’t prosecute Catholic priests for sexual and child abuse? Where was your empathy?  JACK HELLNER

SHE’S CORRUPT, AMORAL, BRIBES SUCKING BUT ISN’T THAT WHY BIDEN WANTED HER TO BE V.P?

SHE’S A SOCIOPATH LAWYER!

https://kamala-harris-sociopath.blogspot.com/2020/09/kamala-harris-amoral-corrupt-bribes.html

Tucker Carlson of Fox News calls Harris a corrupt and dangerous fraud who sees laws and powers only as means to punish her enemies, pursue her agenda, and get elected. 

Kamala Harris on ‘What We Need to Do to Value Life…What We Need to Do in Terms of the Dignity of Life’

By CNSNews.com Staff | February 1, 2021 | 12:28pm EST

 

(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
(Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) - Vice President Kamala Harris sent out a tweet on Friday featuring a video in which she urges people to get vaccinated for COVID-19, arguing that it is something Americans should do “when we talk about what we need to do to value life, when we talk about what we need to do in terms of the dignity of life.”

The clip shows her talking about and getting her own second COVID-19 vaccine shot.

“Hey, everybody. I got my second shot today,” Harris says. “The booster, the vaccine—and it was painless. And it’s simple, it takes a minute, and not even a minute, it takes seconds—and it’ll save your life.  

“And it’ll save your family’s life. And it will help save lives in your community and in our country,” she said.

“So when we talk about what we need to do to value life, when we talk about what we need to do in terms of the dignity of life, and what we know is that this vaccine is going to make a difference on that,” she said.

In the text of the tweet that Harris sent out, she writes: "Get vaccinated. Save lives."

Here is the full transcript of the video Vice President Harris tweeted out on Friday:

Kamala Harris: “Hey, everybody. I got my second shot today. The booster, the vaccine—and it was painless. And it’s simple, it takes a minute, and not even a minute, it takes seconds—and it’ll save your life.  And it’ll save your family’s life. And it will help save lives in your community and in our country. You know, so many people have been so hard-hit by this. And, in particular, when we look at communities of color: African Americans, Latinos. So when we talk about what we need to do to value life, when we talk about what we need to do in terms of the dignity of life, and what we know is that this vaccine is going to make a difference on that. So please, when it is your turn, when it is time for you to get vaccinated, get the shot. It is safe, it is simple, and it will save lives. “


It is the handmaidens working for Planned Parenthood who have joked about selling aborted baby body parts.  And it was Kamala Harris, when she was A.G. of California, who viciously prosecuted the young man who exposed that scandal, after she had received a hefty donation from Planned Parenthood.

Handmaid's Tale? Leftist handmaidens destroyed the USA

By Diana Mary Sitek

Many rational people who attempted to read Margaret Atwood's dystopian The Handmaid's Tale (1985) found it a big yawn.  But the left loved it.  So Hulu (a Disney company partly owned by Comcast), naturally made a mini-series of it.

Now we have the left opining, on September 21, that people like Amy Barrett were the inspiration for that totalitarian nightmare.  "Amy Coney Barrett, a favorite to be President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee to replace Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, is affiliated with a type of Christian religious group that served as inspiration for Margaret Atwood's dystopian novel, The Handmaid's Tale."

I suggest that the boot is on the other foot!  It has been the women of the left who are first and foremost the handmaidens responsible for the appalling state of the nation and its totalitarian, "woke" culture — and their narcissist soy boys like former President Obama, Trudeau of Canada, Newsom of California, et al.  Looked at in this light, Joe Biden is the perfect Democrat candidate!  As a white, ineffectual, imbecilic male, ready to drop off the perch, he is exactly what Democrat women love — and why they detest his opposite, Donald Trump.

Women now have enormous political power through sheer numbers.  Although there has been no female president as yet, women are heavily represented at all levels of the political, legal, bureaucratic, educational, health, H.R., and local county sectors.  Women are a determinative voting segment, and younger women have been educated to identify with the left.  Therefore, it is their policies, and their values alone, that have been enacted, including claiming the murder of their unborn children as their natural right.

It is the handmaiden founders of Black Lives Matter who have denigrated women's traditional role (part of the "oppressive patriarchy") and who have encouraged street violence.

It is the handmaidens working for Planned Parenthood who have joked about selling aborted baby body parts.  And it was Kamala Harris, when she was A.G. of California, who viciously prosecuted the young man who exposed that scandal, after she had received a hefty donation from Planned Parenthood.

So what area of the dystopian, censored "woke" society we now find ourselves in are women not responsible for?  The Deep State?  Oh, no!  We have the corruption of HRC — and scandal after scandal involving female politicians and officeholders, day after day.  The latest is handmaid Ilhan Omar's treacherous ballot-harvesting in Minneapolis. 

Professor Janice Fiamengo's YouTube "Fiamengo Files" (now very heavily censored) give witness to the diabolical hatred of men that characterizes these feminist handmaidens.  And we have Jane Fonda telling us why women are at the forefront of the unscientific climate change hoax, where men are accused of raping Gaia!  Nancy Pelosi, in an attempt to distract attention from her hairdo hissy fit and the left's mismanagement of forest areas, has told us Mother Nature is angry.  Nor can we overlook that handmaiden of Gaia, the squinty-eyed Greta Thunberg.  As for globalism, the U.N. says women are key to that supra-nationalist organization's sustainable development goals.  Translate: New World Order.

Teenage handmaidens are at the forefront of the LGBT+ gender revolution, as revealed by Abigail Shrier in her book Irreversible Damage:  The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters.  The health industry is on board and immediately affirms the young handmaidens' self-diagnosis, frequently entailing drastic surgery and hormonal intervention.

One can only ask what else remains for these handmaidens to destroy.  Virtually nothing.  Traditional hearth and home demolished.  Constitutional law shredded.  Civil war lit.  Gender confusion.  A.I.-human interface planned.  They have, with the help of their male enablers and those who do not see themselves as the beneficiaries of dead, white males, chopped out, erased, expunged, and revoked the Western heritage, root and branch.  Yet, having accomplished all of this, they are unhappy.  It's not enough.  There are still those who dare to protest against them, like the illustrious signatories of the recent Philadelphia Statement, courteously requesting a return to freedom of speech in the cause of liberal democracy.  They will be canceled out because the Amazon handmaids have debauched the language as well, using the terminology of liberal democracy to mean its opposite (exactly as their buddies, the Chinese, do).

But there is hope.  We know from history that moral decay eventually leads to societal collapse — and the opportunity to rebuild anew.  I believe we may be witnessing not the beginning of a new nightmare, but the final death agonies of the feminist dystopia, paralleled in the fate of Joe Biden.

Intrinsic to the human psyche is a foundational desire to adore the Eternal Good — which many call "God."  When that is replaced by the lust for power, as Faust testified, hell enters.  In making that Faustian bargain, by exchanging womanly graces for vengeful power, the handmaids sowed the seeds of their own destruction.  That is the chaos we now behold. 

 

Kamala Harris -- Planned Parenthood's Choice

By Daniel John Sobieski

Kamala Harris has been nominated by the Democratic Party to be a heartbeat away from the presidency, and judging from presidential nominee Joe Biden’s physical and mental condition these days, that might not amount to a whole lot of heartbeats. Her ascension would bring to power someone who has made war on the unborn, someone who has already used that power to shred the Constitution’s guarantee of the freedom of the press and persecute an investigative reporter who exposed Planned Parenthood’s efforts to harvest and sell aborted fetal body parts.  

David Daleiden heads the Center for Medical Progress, the group that unveiled what really goes on behind the curtain at Planned Parenthood, exposing the ghoulishness of the organization that profits off the destruction of human life and detailing past and future atrocities perpetrated by that organization in a series of revealing and damning videos.

Daleiden’s pro-life investigative reporting did not sit well with then California Attorney General Kamala Harris, who made it her mission to cancel Daleiden and his group, raiding his house, seizing his videos, video equipment, and notes, all with the purpose of ending his livelihood, his career, and his freedom. She prosecuted Daleiden under an obscure, rarely used, and arguably unconstitutional state law. As LiveAction.org reports:

Planned Parenthood relied heavily on its political allies to suppress the First Amendment rights of pro-life investigators David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt after the pair uncovered the corporation’s illegal trafficking of aborted body parts. Former California General Kamala Harris and current California Attorney General Xavier Becerra both pursued charges against the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) journalists instead of prosecuting Planned Parenthood for its criminal activities.

The federal civil rights lawsuit Daleiden filed in response has exposed how far Planned Parenthood’s political contacts will go to defend the organization’s reputation.

A recent update from Daleiden revealed that Planned Parenthood, Harris, and Becerra have all responded to the lawsuit filed against them, adding that all parties named in the suit have admitted the only reason Daleiden is being prosecuted is because the content of what he has said is something Planned Parenthood considers objectionable. The footage from Daleiden’s undercover investigation showed Planned Parenthood staff members coldly discussing the harvesting of fetal organs and negotiating the price of these “specimens.”

The Harris-managed vendetta against Daleiden, including a raid reminiscent of the deep-state raids on the homes of Roger Stone and Paul Manafort, is detailed by Madeline Osburn over at the Federalist:

Sen. Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for vice president Wednesday night, exactly three weeks after journalist and pro-life activist David Daleiden appeared in a San Francisco Superior Court, once again fighting the criminal charges Harris brought against him at the behest of her political donors four years prior. As Harris joins a campaign fighting for the “soul of our nation,” Daleiden continues a years-long battle for countless unborn souls and the First Amendment, both of which Harris has a record of fighting against.

In March 2016, as the California attorney general, Harris met with six Planned Parenthood officials in her Los Angeles office. Email records between Harris’s office and Planned Parenthood officials show the two were corresponding on orchestrating public responses, filing police reports, and even drafting legislation targeting Daleiden for his undercover videos exposing the abortion giant’s illegal practices…

Two weeks following that Los Angeles meeting, on April 5, 2016, Harris ordered state law enforcement agents to raid Daleiden’s home, tasking them with seizing his camera equipment, documents, and unreleased video footage. Daleiden’s attorneys argued Harris’s search warrant should have never been issued according to California’s shield law, which explicitly protects citizen journalists’ unpublished materials…

How blatant was Harris’s targeting of Daleiden and her disregard for a journalist’s First Amendment rights? For starters, Daleiden is the first person to ever be prosecuted for undercover video reporting in California. Her own deputy prosecutor later admitted in court that Daleiden was targeted solely because of the content his videos...

The appalling transcript of one disturbing video provided by the Center for Medical Progress has made clear that the alleged noble crusade against unwanted children is a fraud, and that Planned Parenthood’s interest in abortion is a financial one -- that human life is just a commodity to be bought and sold on the open market.

The video shows Planned Parenthood director of medical services Deborah Nucatola negotiating with two actors posing as agents of a fetal tissue procurement company discussing the body parts of aborted babies as if she was a butcher at the local meat market, as Breitbart.com reports:

“We’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I’m not gonna crush that part,” Nucatola coldly explains. “I’m gonna basically crush [the unborn child] below, I’m gonna crush above, and I’m gonna see if I can get it all intact… And for that reason, most providers will do this case under ultrasound guidance, so they’ll know where they’re putting their forceps.”

Nucatola also goes into great detail to explain how Planned Parenthood is able to use its loose affiliates as a way to protect the parent company from potential legal fallout…

Nucatola explains to the undercover reporters that the butchered body parts (hearts, livers, “lower extremities -- probably for the muscle”) sell for $30 to $100  apiece.

Indeed, immature or improperly dismembered baby parts could dramatically impact Planned Parenthood’s and the abortion industry’s bottom line. The use of aborted fetuses and their tissue is justified by abortionists as the key to medical research, as was using embryos for stem cell research. Planned Parenthood’s operation strays perilously close to the territory of Dr. Joseph Mengele, the Nazi “doctor” who justified his ghastly practices in the name of research.

Planned Parenthood and its supporters got caught with their forceps down, so anything they can do to cloud the issue and cast doubt on the integrity of their accusers is in their interest. Planned Parenthood has already tried to discredit the videos, saying they were carefully edited and that the admissions of Planned Parenthood officials of conducting a for-profit baby body part flea market was taken out of context. It is hard to imagine in what “context” the discussion of the price of a fetal head versus the price of a new Lamborghini is okay. As LifeNews.com comments:

The video of the Houston Planned Parenthood makes it appear the Planned Parenthood abortion business may be selling the “fully intact” bodies of unborn babies purposefully born alive and left to die. The video shows the Director of Research for Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Melissa Farrell, advertising the Texas Planned Parenthood branch’s track record of fetal tissue sales, including its ability to deliver fully intact aborted babies…

Planned Parenthood could be breaking the federal law known as the Born Alive Infants Protection Act that requires abortion clinics, hospitals and other places that do abortions to provide appropriate medical care for a baby born alive after a failed abortion or purposefully birthed to “let die.” That would be one of the potential ways Planned Parenthood could produce a “fully intact” baby to sell to StemExpress for research. Most “crunchy” abortion methods would do damage to the baby’s body.

Kamala Harris decided that Daleiden must be punished for exposing the ghastly activities of her patron Planned Parenthood. A similar fate awaits the rest of us should she grab the reins of power. Tucker Carlson of Fox News has rightly called Kamala Harris a corrupt and dangerous fraud who sees laws and powers only as means to punish her enemies, pursue her agenda, and get elected:

Carlson, who called Biden's vice presidential pick the "most consequential" choice in U.S. history, disputed Sen. Kamala Harris's authenticity on her progressive positions, saying the "front-runner" only stands by issues she knows will get her ahead in the polls. He cited the California Democrat's low polling numbers at the time that she ended her own bid for the presidency and dropped out of the Democratic primary race.

"The wrap on Harris in exit polls is that she’s a fraud," Carlson said. "She doesn’t really believe in anything, she'll say whatever it takes. Of course, that is also Harris’s primary strength."

Carlson also brought up an incident in which anti-abortion activist David Daleiden filed a lawsuit against Harris, alleging she and California Attorney General Xavier Becerra conspired with Planned Parenthood to terminate an investigation he was conducting into the fetal-tissue business. Daleiden accused Harris and Becerra of violating his First Amendment rights and abusing the state's two-party recording law to silence "disfavored speech."

Kamala Harris, like Biden, supports Planned Parenthood’s crimes against the unborn and takes money and endorsements from the abortion industry. One remembers her bitter and vitriolic participation in the Supreme Court confirmation hearing for Justice Brett Kavanaugh, her resorting to lies, falsehoods, and innuendo in an attempt to get what she wants and to keep this pro-life Catholic off the Supreme Court.

Kamala Harris, who slept her way into political power riding former California General Assembly leader Willie Brown’s, er, coattails, is a political dominatrix willing to inflict supreme pain and damage to our Constitution, our civil liberties, and the unborn     

Daniel John Sobieski is a former editorial writer for Investor’s Business Daily and freelance writer whose pieces have appeared in Human EventsReason Magazine, and the Chicago Sun-Times among other publications.     

Image: Michael Steeben       

  

BANKSTERS' RENT BOY LAWYER CHUCK SCHUMER SAYS CLIMATE CRISIS IS REAL - BUT ADDS THAT MEXICO'S INVASION OF UNREGISTERED DEM VOTERS IS IMAGINARY

 

Chuck Schumer: ‘The Climate Crisis is an Emergency’

By CNSNews.com Staff | February 1, 2021 | 3:28pm EST
 
(Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)
(Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

(CNSNews.com) - Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D.-N.Y.) sent out a tweet on Sunday—as a snow storm hit Washington, D.C.—declaring that: “The climate crisis is an emergency.”

In his tweet, Schumer called for Biden to declare a national emergency.

“President Biden should declare a national emergency on the climate crisis,” Schumer said.

“Donald Trump declared a fake emergency for his ineffective, wasteful wall,” Schumer said. “That was no emergency.

“The climate crisis is an emergency,” Schumer said.


Biden Administration Kills Two Trump Foreign Worker Reforms

An unnamed entity to "study the abuses in the Optional Practical Training program", belatedly birthed during the last two weeks of the Trump administration, has already been killed by the Biden administration, according to Breitbart.

The entity was created on January 13 and killed on January 26, when it was less than two weeks old.

The OPT program grants 8.25 percent subsidies to U.S. employers if they hire alien graduates of U.S. colleges and universities, a subsidy not available if the employer hires a citizen (or green-card) graduate. It is a huge program covering hundreds of thousands of aliens, many hoping to get longer-term visas and jobs in the (unsubsidized) H-1B program.

To add insult to injury, the subsidies to employers are taken out of the hides of ailing, elderly, and unemployed Americans, as the nonpayment of these deductions of 8.25 percent of payroll taxes reduce income for the Medicare, Social Security, and federal unemployment insurance trust funds. At least $2 billion a year is lost in this way; the three funds are on shaky enough footings without these OPT-created losses.

Meanwhile, the Biden administration has, according to one news account, decided to withdraw a Trump proposal to eliminate work permits for a specific (and large) subset of aliens, mostly from India. These are spouses (more than 90 percent of them women) married to H-1B workers who are on the long track to green card status; these are H-4s. The Obama administration, without congressional approval, made it possible for them to receive work authorizations.

One thing you can say about the H-4 program, however, is this: There are no subsidies to workers or employers.

Did I find out about these two steps backward from government press releases, or the mainstream media? Hardly.

Breitbart News is the right-wing news source started by the recently pardoned Steve Bannon, and the H-4 news was reported by the Times of India.


Biden Administration Should Enact a National Population Policy

The fifth of several occasional postings from a life-long Democrat

While the previous articles in this series have dealt with highly specific suggestions regarding parts of our immigration system, today we get into a more fundamental discussion: The nation needs an overall population policy, something we have never had.

Creating a population policy would involve recognizing such basic questions as these:

  • We have 20 million or so unemployed people; do we need to import more workers?
  • Can our aging infrastructure, such as our hospitals, accommodate more people?
  • Wouldn't our vaccine crisis be less severe if there were fewer of us?
  • Is our current tax system generating enough revenue to take care of our population-induced problems and to keep us solvent?
  • More specifically, do we need more low-skilled arrivals, the kinds of workers we get through illegal immigration and, as legal migrants, through the family preferences?

To ask these questions is to answer them.

A national population policy would recognize that immigration policy is but part of a much larger picture, and one that should not be shaped by narrow (and often emotional) considerations, such as viewing ours as a "nation of immigrants" or pleas based on power plays by ethnic, commercial, or partisan interests.

Population growth has become based more on immigration than anything else, and population growth is not linked to better lives for those living in the U.S. now.

Immigration policy should be a sub-set of population policy.


North, now a resident of Arlington, Va., was his party's candidate for Congress in New Jersey's Fifth District more than 60 years ago and was, later, assistant to the chairman of the Democratic National Committee and worked on immigration policy in the LBJ White House.



Is Biden Reconsidering Mass Amnesty Legislation?

The Kremlinology of the missing fact sheet and the clue in the Wall Street Journal

By Andrew R. Arthur on January 28, 2021

Shortly after the inauguration on January 20, the new White House website published a fact sheet captioned "President Biden Sends Immigration Bill to Congress as Part of His Commitment to Modernize our Immigration System". It called for an amnesty, increases in legal immigration, and an expansion of employment authorization, but no enforcement reforms. Subsequent developments raise the question of whether Biden wants immigration legislation, or just an issue. Perhaps he has changed his mind.

Why do I say that?

If you click on the link above, it will not take you to the White House website, but to a Google cache of that page as it appeared at 12:07 PM EST, or seven minutes after the new administration took effect. I cannot find it on the White House website (although "Immigration" appears on the site's "Immediate Priorities" page, only in a much more truncated manner).

The disappearance of a major policy document could occur for any number of reasons, but one of them is that it was pulled down, deliberately.

As for the part about Biden sending Congress an immigration bill, subsequent reporting suggests that may not be exact, either. On January 26, Politico, in an article captioned "Biden open to breaking his immigration bill into pieces", made the following statement:

Biden's proposal, introduced hours after he was sworn in, includes a pathway to citizenship for 11 million undocumented immigrants, expanded refugee resettlement and more technology deployed to the border. Though he is leaving Congress to hash out the mechanics of passing his immigration plan, he's also moving ahead with a slate of executive actions on Friday. [Emphasis added.]

For those not familiar with the publication, Politico is kind of a "tip sheet" for Washington insiders. It features leaks (approved and otherwise) from those on the inside in the White House and on Capitol Hill, along with other news from the federal government.

"Mechanics" in the highlighted portion can mean any number of things, from the methods that leadership plans on using to bring the bill to fruition to the actual language of the bill itself.

I note, though, that I have not actually seen any bill language implementing the plans in the missing fact sheet. Nor can I find the "U.S. Citizenship Act" (the purported name of the legislation) on the congressional website, or any other significant immigration legislation there for that matter.

I may be missing something, but this suggests either that bill language was sent by the White House and is still being reviewed by majority Democrats, or that a series of proposals were sent by the White House to be massaged into congressional language. Or maybe Democrats from the White House to Congress are regrouping.

Which brings me to a January 26 column by opinion writer William A. Galston in the Wall Street Journal, captioned "Does Biden Want a Bill or an Issue? He'll accomplish more if he makes a realistic to-do list rather than an ambitious wish list".

As I have previously alluded to, Galston, a staunch liberal, often acts as a sounding board for what insider Democrats are thinking, or he seems to, at least.

Here's what he had to say on Biden's immigration legislation:

Comprehensive immigration reform threatens to become the cap-and-trade of the Biden administration. Although the president's proposal has broad appeal within his party, Republican support is less certain. With the abolition of the filibuster apparently off the table, a comprehensive proposal lacks a viable path to passage.

Mr. Biden could pursue a strategy that has been ignored for many years by presidents of both parties: Test the waters with congressional leaders of both parties and then work with bipartisan groups in the House and Senate to determine the limits of the possible. On immigration, this approach could yield quick agreement on a bill to protect from deportation young adult "Dreamers" brought to the country as children, guarantee their legal status, and define a path to citizenship.

"Cap-and-trade" in the first paragraph refers to an Obama legislative initiative on climate regulation that consumed a lot of political capital and went nowhere in 2010, before Democrats lost control of the House in the off-year election. It is not an analogy to successful legislation.

Candidate Biden had a rather specific immigration agenda during the 2020 campaign, but it was largely ignored in the press and seemingly by voters, for whom "immigration" per se was not as big an issue as the economy, healthcare, and Covid-19. Biden's plan was there for all to see, but few people (aside from me and a few others) commented on it much.

Respectfully, Biden was not elected based on a pledge to shut down immigration enforcement or to enact an amnesty for almost every alien illegally present in the United States. He was elected because he was not Donald Trump (the tagline of his campaign was "Battle for the Soul of the Nation", seemingly admitting as much).

But Biden would not be the first candidate to mistake election for mandate. In this case, however, it has led to his first setback, as a federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order against DHS's plan to halt almost all removals from the United States for 100 days (which I analyzed on January 27) in contravention of a 90-day removal mandate in the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Biden has long had a reputation as a "dealmaker", so a "You'll get nothing, and like it" attitude (as my colleague Mark Krikorian recently put it) toward those who recognize the need for enforcement reforms when it comes to immigration legislation is contrary to his reputation, if not his actual nature. Which makes the now-missing White House fact sheet all the more intriguing.

Perhaps its apparent trip down the memory hole, and the absence of actual immigration legislation that enshrines the proposals set forth in that fact sheet, reflects a pause in the president's consideration of the issue.

Banging on Republicans in Congress who would block amnesty legislation (to whom Galston references above) as "do-nothings" could create a wedge issue for Democratic candidates in the 2022 off-year elections for the House and Senate. Maybe not, though, because again, while immigration underpins many of the issues most important to voters, there has not been a big groundswell for such an amnesty.

Keep in mind that immigration enforcement, though, was a key issue to Donald Trump's administration (although one on which he did not campaign significantly in the last election, either), and that Trump ended up receiving 74,222,593 votes — more than any candidate in history other than Biden — even though he lost.

Sometimes, a disappointed voter becomes a discouraged one. Occasionally, however, they become even more committed. And victory can often breed complacency. No one really knows what the next election will bring.

Given all this, perhaps the White House realized that it acted hastily in releasing its now-missing fact sheet, and that a serious immigration proposal, more limited in scope and with needed reforms (such as statutory language authorizing immigration detainers and limitations on sanctuary jurisdictions, to name two) that could draw in congressional Republicans is under consideration.

Or perhaps not. Figuring out what is happening behind closed doors in Washington is often akin to "Kremlinology", best defined as "the formalized study of hard facts in a closed society, observing appointments, organization, decrees, and formal speeches". There are similar signposts in D.C. You just have to know where to look, and try to get the analysis right.



CLARK: Joe Biden’s Immigration Plan Will Impact Communities Far from Border

Protesters gather near Trump Tower to protest against attacks on immigrants under policies of US President Donald Trump, August 15, 2017 in New York. / AFP PHOTO / Eduardo MUNOZ ALVAREZ (Photo credit should read EDUARDO MUNOZ ALVAREZ/AFP/Getty Images)
EDUARDO MUNOZ ALVAREZ/AFP/Getty Images
6:53

When we think of illegal immigration and its impact on America, opinions are sharply divided. The images invoked are “kids in cages,” large caravans, border rescues, and wild border chases between law enforcement and illegal immigrant smugglers.

The U.S. southern border is just a waypoint for migrants along a much larger journey. One that usually ends far from the deserts of Arizona, the brush country in Texas, or the beaches and mountains near San Diego.

According to the Pew Research Center, most of the undocumented immigrants within the United States live in just 20 major metropolitan areas. Ranking number one is the New York metro area which is home to 1.1 million illegal immigrants. Ranking number two is the Los Angeles metro area — home to an estimated 925,000 illegal aliens.

There is no reason to believe that future illegal immigration patterns will trend away from these select metropolitan areas considering many, including New York and Los Angeles, are sanctuary cities. What is interesting is the outward migration from these areas.

During the COVID-19 Pandemic, New York’s wealthiest residents left the city in record numbers. U.S. Census Bureau statistics indicate over 126 thousand residents left New York state between July 2019 and July 2020. Many of them seeking states with no state income tax such as Texas or Florida.

The same data shows over 135,000 residents left California. Prominent tech giants Oracle and Hewlett Packard announced the relocation of operations from California to Texas. Tesla CEO Elon Musk followed suit.

So far, President Joe Biden promised an immigration plan that will include a pathway to citizenship for over 11 million illegal immigrants currently living in the shadows. His recent executive orders ending the “remain in Mexico” program, also known as the Migrant Protection Protocols, and his executive order reducing interior enforcement of immigration laws have all but decimated the strong anti-illegal immigration measures of the Trump administration. In essence, the welcome mat has been laid out.

So far, the new president has not defined any real position on increasing border security or that it is of any relevance to him. The Immigration Reform and Control Act contained provisions to increase the size of the U.S. Border Patrol by 50 percent each year during the two years after its passage. As a deterrent to future illegal immigration, significant employer sanctions measures were put in place.  This clause was largely to garner bi-partisan support in Congress.

In stark contrast, The U.S. Citizenship Act of 2021, which President Biden has presented to Congress, lacks any substantial enforcement strategy to curtail future illegal immigration once the amnesty portion is concluded.

Far from increasing efforts to deter future illegal immigration, a fact sheet on Biden’s immigration plan provided to reporters by the White House focuses more on providing pathways to relief from our current immigration laws than identifying ways to properly enforce them.

According to the fact sheet:

The bill codifies and funds the President’s $4 billion four-year inter-agency plan to address the underlying causes of migration in the region, including by increasing assistance to El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, conditioned on their ability to reduce the endemic corruption, violence, and poverty that causes people to flee their home countries.

Rather than any increase in personnel needed to ready the Border Patrol to deal with the almost certain influx the bill will promote, the plan lays out enhancements to internal investigation capabilities and oversight.

The fact sheet continues:

The bill provides funding for training and continuing education to promote agent and officer safety and professionalism. It also creates a Border Community Stakeholder Advisory Committee, provides more special agents at the DHS Office of Professional Responsibility to investigate criminal and administrative misconduct, and requires the issuance of department-wide policies governing the use of force.

Much of what little the bill’s fact sheet does say about border security is related to narcotics smuggling at ports of entry and little if any definitive way towards enforcement between the ports of entry. As experience has taught us along the border, if the Border Patrol Agents are processing and caring for thousands of illegal immigrants, very few are patrolling the border. The references to smart technologies are moot if the Border Patrol cannot deploy an adequate response that smart technology will require.

What Biden’s plan does not do is change in any way the existing immigration laws that place people in the shadows in the first place. When all is said and done, it will still be a criminal offense to enter the United States illegally.

Much like the last attempt to provide relief to the illegal immigrant population in 2013 proposed by the “gang of eight,” Bidens plan will surely face significant opposition from certain members of Congress. It is far from a bi-partisan bill at this point.

The mere fact an amnesty plan has been proposed and the lax tenor of other executive actions related to immigration will have implications miles from the border. In states like New York and California, where tax revenues plummeted due to the exodus of wealthy residents, a new wave of illegal immigrants will pose significant financial impacts as they continue to battle COVID-19 and its effect on employment opportunities.

As many businesses look to automation to reduce labor costs and other businesses are suffering COVID-19-related closures, President Biden added tens of thousands of workers to the unemployment line by canceling permits to the Keystone Pipeline.

Biden’s intention to increase the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour poses another risk to the viability of many small businesses.

Many factors influence illegal immigration to the United States. Changes in our economy or the economies abroad, security concerns, and existing employment opportunities in the home country will play a role in future migration to the United States. Although some may disagree, any hope of amnesty in the future will likely cause a future influx as well. For those who currently reside in those major metropolitan areas that historically attract most illegal immigrants, the financial impacts may be felt for years to come.

Randy Clark is a 32-year veteran of the United States Border Patrol. Prior to his retirement, he served as the Division Chief for Law Enforcement Operations, directing operations for nine Border Patrol Stations within the Del Rio, Texas Sector.


NYTimes to Elites: Blame Americans First for Causing Illegal Migration

AP Photo/Alden Pellett
AP Photo/Alden Pellett
10:55

Foreign migrants take American jobs illegally because the federal government will not let them take the jobs legally, according to a new article in the New York Times.

“The Reagan-era amnesty in 1986 caused only a temporary drop in the number of undocumented immigrants because it was not accompanied by a robust system for legally bringing in low-skilled workers,” said the January 27 news article by reporter Miriam Jordan.

The editor-approved headline was “The Reality Behind Biden’s Plan to Legalize 11 Million Immigrants,” referring to illegal migrants.

The New York Times‘ perspective on illegal migration matches George W. Bush’s “Any Willing Worker” strategy, said Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies:

It is the business perspective that the level of immigration should be set by market conditions, that there are no limits. The desires of business and of the immigrants are the two things that determine how many immigrants come here, not the American people’s elected representatives.

The same claim was loudly made in 1990 when Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and President George H. Bush doubled the inflow of legal immigrants and visa workers in the 1990 immigration expansion act.

Nonetheless, 5.5 million illegal migrants moved into the United States from 1900 to 2000, doubling the illegal population to seven million, according to a report by the Department of Homeland Security.

That illegal inflow happened even though Congress also created the blue-collar H-2A and H-2B visa worker programs in 1986 and allowed the J-1 program to quadruple during the 1990s.

The Bush/Kennedy 1990 act also allowed CEOs to push two generations of U.S. professionals out of skilled careers because it allowed the Fortune 500 CEOs to import a huge number of H-1B visa contract workers. That legal inflow still helps investors suppress competition by minimizing the number of innovative Americans and consolidating their control of the sector.

The New York Times report also downplays the civic and economic value of automating and mechanizing lower-skilled jobs, claiming that “Demographers say a shortage of blue-collar workers highlights the need for immigrants, in ever larger numbers, to perform low-skilled jobs.”

There is growing evidence that labor migration reduces pressure on investors to redirect their profits back into the productivity-boosting traininginnovationautomation, and robotics that can keep lower-skilled Americans and America rich, stable, and more equal, amid growing worldwide competition.

“If the [pro-migration advocates] got their way, we would end up with the United Arab Emirates in North America,” where a wealthy elite dominates a population of imported, powerless, and replaceable workers, Krikorian said. He added:

The [advocates] just say, “Well, a rising tide raises all boats, and more immigrants mean there’s also more demand [for American workers] in the economy and so everybody wins.” There is no cost, there are no trade-offs, there are no losers, just a happy-clappy way of looking at the issue.

I think they believe [their own claims] because they don’t want to think beyond that. And [they think] people who put forth a different position are bad people and so [the different position] can’t be right because they’re bad people.

Jordan’s view is commonplace throughout the establishment — and in the White House following the election of President Joe Biden.

“President [Joe Biden] outlined his plan to reduce migration,” said a January 23 White House statement:

by … increasing [migrant] resettlement capacity and lawful alternative immigration pathways [in the United States], improving processing at the [U.S.] border to adjudicate [migrants’] requests for asylum, and reversing the previous administration’s draconian immigration policies.

“One of the things that I think is critical to remember,” said Roberta Jacobson, Biden’s newly hired coordinator for the southern border, in a June 2020 conversation with other migration advocates, is that:

The United States closed off almost every other avenue for migration from Central America, and indeed, from Mexico to the United States, which in some respects, not completely, forced people to seek asylum, right? There aren’t temporary worker programs other than agricultural and low skilled H-2A [programs], and those have struggled, frankly, to keep up with both demand and processing. And so people have sort of resorted to requesting asylum, both for legitimate reasons, but also because they don’t know of any other way to get to the United States.

For years, a wide variety of pollsters have shown deep and broad opposition to labor migration — or the hiring of temporary contract workers into the jobs sought by young U.S. graduates. The multiracialcross-sexnon-racistclass-basedpriority-driven, and solidarity-themed opposition to labor migration coexists with generally favorable personal feelings toward legal immigrants and toward immigration in theory.

The deep public opposition is built on the widespread recognition that migration moves money from employees to employers, from families to investors, from young to old, from children to their parents, from homebuyers to real estate investors, and from the central states to the coastal states.

Migration allows investors and CEOs to skimp on labor-saving technology, sideline U.S. minorities, ignore disabled peopleexploit stoop labor in the fields, shortchange labor in the cities, impose tight control and pay cuts on American professionals, corral technological innovation by minimizing the employment of innovative American graduates, undermine Americans’ labor rights, and redirect progressive journalists to cheerlead for Wall Street’s priorities and claims.

Jordan’s George W. Bush-like statement at the New York Times is echoed by editors at the investor-dominated Wall Street Journal.

Under a January 26 headline, “On Immigration, Compromise Beats Amnesty,” columnist Jason Riley called for investors to compromise with progressive groups:

… the amnesty debate is largely a side issue. Simply legalizing the status of these migrants—most of whom have been in the country for more than a decade—won’t solve the larger problem, which is the imbalance between the number of [worker] visas available and the number of foreigners who want them. After World War II, the federal government’s Bracero program extended work visas to Mexican migrants to address a U.S. labor shortage, and the rate of illegal immigration plummeted … The biggest failure of the 1986 amnesty under Ronald Reagan was that it did little to expand ways to come lawfully. Mr. Biden should avoid making the same mistake.

“The only answer to this [migrant pressure] quandary is to open more legal pathways,” WSJ columnist Mary Anatasia Gray wrote January 24.

The New York Times offers uncritical support for labor migration, but also it reports the spreading poverty in immigrant-dominated suburbs and cities.

On January 29, for example, the New York Times posted a detailed report showing the coronavirus’s spread through the migrant-heavy Los Angeles region:

County officials recently estimated that one in three of Los Angeles County’s roughly 10 million people have been infected with Covid-19 since the beginning of the pandemic. But even amid an uncontrolled outbreak, some Angelenos have faced higher risk than others. County data shows that Pacoima, a predominantly Latino neighborhood that has one of the highest case rates in the nation, has roughly five times the rate of Covid-19 cases as much richer and whiter Santa Monica.

The essential workers who risk getting sick on the job are more likely to be Latino and more likely to live in overcrowded houses and apartments without space to isolate, experts have saidthroughout the pandemic.

Their jobs — including those in warehousesfood processing plantsrestaurant kitchens and factories — are likely to be lower paid, and workers are less likely to be able to take time off when they’re sick.

The large-scale use of migrant labor also leaves American workers more vulnerable to pressure from foremen and hiring managers. The Wall Street Journal reported January 5:

In a 2019 report by Barclays Research that examined data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the bank’s analysts said that opioid use in the U.S. has made workers in the industry less productive and has increased costs to the industry. While the precise number of overdose deaths in the North American construction industry is hard to determine, the workers are roughly six times more likely than workers in other manufacturing, industrial and service industries to become addicted to opioids, according to the report.

Mr. Anderson, a 28-year-old elevator mechanic who works in New York City, became addicted to Percocet and OxyContin when he started his first construction job framing houses at 19 years of age. He found that he could get more work done when he was high and unable to feel the strain of the job.

“I was doing my thing, doing my work, and life didn’t become a mess,” he said. “It was no harm, no foul.” Eventually, however, he found he couldn’t even get to work without the drugs and spent almost all his money on the pills. When those became too expensive or difficult to find, he switched to heroin.

Jordan’s New York Times article included a quote from a California academic who has seen his state transformed by commingled waves of cheap legal and illegal labor since 1990:

“The principle is simple: If you carry out a broad legalization [of illegal migrants], it doesn’t freeze undocumented migration flows as long as labor demand persists,” said Wayne Cornelius, director emeritus of the Center for Comparative Immigration Studies at the University of California, San Diego.

“That’s why you need to increase the number of legal-entry opportunities, to accommodate future migrants,” Cornelius emailed Breitbart News.

However, Cornelis declined to answer any questions about the impact of a migrant-flooded labor market on the distribution of wealth and poverty throughout California and the United States.

Many investors gain from importing a population of poor, taxpayer-aided consumers.