Tuesday, March 30, 2021

SCARY! - SOCIOPATH LAWYER KAMALA HARRIS - HAS SPENT TOO MUCH OF HER TIME SUCKING OFF BRIBES

 

The meaning behind Kamala's cackle

Video emerged of Kamala Harris recently speaking about the problems parents face when their schools are closed but they can't afford childcare.  This is a serious issue with massive repercussions for children's development and for working mothers.  So what did Kamala do?  She cracked herself up, laughing so hard she could barely get the words out.  What the heck is going on with that woman?

Here's the video, so that you can see I'm not exaggerating.  For some reason, Harris finds it inordinately funny that parents and children are suffering, even as she backs away compulsively from her audience:

This is not the first time we've seen Kamala laugh uncontrollably and inappropriately.  A few more examples show that it's a go-to behavior for her.  For example, when Stephen Colbert asked Kamala ever so delicately how she could accept the offer to become Biden's vice president when she'd agreed that he probably sexually molested someone, Kamala couldn't stop laughing:

Kamala also thought it was hysterically funny that people are suffering along the southern border now that the Biden administration has thrown aside America's immigration laws:

Kamala also couldn't stop laughing when asked if she was a socialist:

And then there was the time in 2018 when Kamala thought it was hysterically funny to joke about killing Republicans, including Trump and Pence — a joke that, were any other person to make it, would earn a knock on the door from the FBI:

If you look up "inappropriate laughter," a few things pop up.  It turns out that it can be a nervous system disorder called Pseudobulbar affect (AKA emotional incontinence).  According to the Mayo Clinic's website,

Pseudobulbar affect (PBA) is a condition that's characterized by episodes of sudden uncontrollable and inappropriate laughing or crying. Pseudobulbar affect typically occurs in people with certain neurological conditions or injuries, which might affect the way the brain controls emotion.

In other words, in addition to a president sliding into dementia, we could have a vice president with a neurological disorder.  Thus, it occurs with people who have:

  • Stroke
  • Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)
  • Multiple sclerosis (MS)
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • Parkinson's disease

It's doubtful Harris suffers from any of the above problems.  (Although wouldn't it be a kick in the pants if she did?)  Additionally, she doesn't laugh at completely random times.  She laughs when she's nervous, and there's even a name for what Harris does: nervous laughter.

Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram conducted one of the earliest and most infamous studies with data about nervous laughter in the 1960s.

His study revealed that people often laughed nervously in uncomfortable situations. People in his study were asked to give electric shocks to a stranger, with the shocks becoming increasingly powerful (up to 450 volts).

But the "strangers" in this case were researchers involved in the study — they weren't actually being shocked. But participants were more likely to laugh at the violence of the situation the higher the volts went.

Neuroscientist V.S. Ramachandran explored this idea in his book "A Brief Tour of Human Consciousness." He proposes that laughter first appeared in human history as a way to indicate to those around us that whatever was making us laugh wasn't a threat or worth worrying about.

So we're essentially reassuring ourselves that whatever's making us uncomfortable isn't that big a deal when we laugh at an uncomfortable situation.

The question, then, is what's making Harris nervous when she (a) glosses over willingly campaigning with someone she accused of sexual assault, or (b) jokes about killing the president, or (c) laughs at the suffering working parents experience when their children cannot go to school?  My guess is that the laughter came about for the following reasons: (a) acknowledging that she has no moral compass and was caught in a lie; (b) knowing she violated a social and legal taboo; and (c) knowing that her administration policies not only aren't helping, but also are making it worse.

That is, in every case, Kamala laughs because she's doing something even she knows is bad and wrong.  I guess it shows she has some semblance of a conscience and therefore isn't a true sociopath.  Imagine, though, when she inevitably takes over for Biden and is responsible for dealing with foreign powers.  She's going to be a disaster, signaling loudly to her opponents (Putin, Xi, the mullahs) that she's lying, doing something wrong, or is about to make things much worse.


Mo Brooks Slams Chamber of Commerce on Immigration — ‘Great Damage’ to Low-Income Families, ‘Impeding the Success’ of Middle Class

 

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.

http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html

Globalism: Google VP Kent Walker insists that despite its repeated rejection by electorates around the world, “globalization” is an “incredible force for good.”

 

Hillary Clinton’s Democratic party: An executive nearly broke down crying because of the candidate’s loss. Not a single executive expressed anything but dismay at her defeat. 

 

Immigration: Maintaining liberal immigration in the U.S is the policy that Google’s executives discussed the most. 

 

IMAGES OF AMERICA UNDER LA RAZA

MEX OCCUPATION:

 

Your neighborhood will be next to fall to LA RAZA!

 

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2013/10/america-la-raza-mexicos-wide-open.html

Mo Brooks Slams Chamber of Commerce on Immigration — ‘Great Damage’ to Low-Income Families, ‘Impeding the Success’ of Middle Class

1:51

Representative Mo Brooks (R-AL), who earlier this week formally declared his candidacy for the U.S. Senate in 2022, explained his view on immigration, particularly as it pertains to labor markets, during an interview that aired on Mobile, AL radio’s FM Talk 106.5.

Brooks explained organizations like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce promote immigration policy that “artificially” influences labor markets, which comes with a cost for low-income earners and the middle class.

“[I]f you don’t have an artificial influence on the labor markets if you don’t artificially inflate the labor supply, then if you want that work done, you have to pay workers more to attract them to the work that you want done,” he said. “There is no job in America that Americans won’t do. There are jobs that Americans won’t do at the paltry wages that some employers want to pay. And the employers will be put in a position where they either have to pay the wages that are necessary to attract the workforce they need that is necessary for their businesses to operate, or they go out of business.”

“But that’s the way it is supposed to be in a free enterprise economy where the market forces allocate resources to what’s profitable and denies it to what is not profitable,” Brooks continued. “So, you’re spot-on with your economic analysis, and that’s a very, very big point for the public to understand, and unfortunately, the Chamber of Commerce is just running over us right now and is doing great damage to struggling low-income American families but also impeding the success, the economic success of our middle-class families.”

REMEMBER RICH, LOOTING, SOCIOPATH LAWYERS ARE ABOVE THE LAW - HILLARY CLINTON EXPLAINS HOW SHE DOES IT.

 

Supreme Court Rejects Efforts to Depose Hillary Clinton over Email Server

Former secretary of state Hillary Clinton attends the premiere of the Hulu documentary "Hillary" at the DGA New York Theater on Wednesday, March 4, 2020, in New York. (Photo by Evan Agostini/Invision/AP)
Evan Agostini/Invision/AP
1:45

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday denied efforts to require former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to face a deposition over her unsecured email setup while she served in the Obama administration.

In an unsigned order issued with no comment, the justices denied an appeal from the conservative legal group Judicial Watch, mainly keeping in place a federal appeals court ruling from last August which stated that Clinton could not be forced to sit for a deposition.

Judicial Watch had wanted to depose Clinton, her aide Cheryl Mills, and other State Department employees over Clinton’s use of an unsecured personal email server — even for classified information — in a case seeking public access to State Department emails.

Clinton’s emails were subject to multiple investigations, including an FBI investigation which declined to charge her with violating federal record-keeping requirements or other crimes, despite clear evidence of violations.

Clinton’s emails were a major political issue in her failed 2016 bid against former President Donald Trump.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton issued a statement accusing the court of upholding a “double standard” and undermining faith in public institutions.

“Hillary Clinton ignored the law but received special protection from both the courts and law enforcement,” he said. “For countless Americans, this double standard of justice has destroyed confidence in the fair administration of justice.”

This case is Judicial Watch Inc. v. Clinton, No. 20-1051 in the Supreme Court of the United States.


Report: Ghislaine Maxwell Allegedly Refused to Help Find Bill Clinton Tapes Because It Would Hurt Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Run

British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly refused to help a CBS producer find videotapes Jeffrey Epstein made of Bill Clinton because it would hurt Hillary Clinton's chances of winning the White House in 2016, according to a recently published book.
DNC, MediaPunch/IPX via AP
2:50

British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell allegedly refused to help a CBS producer find videotapes Jeffrey Epstein made of Bill Clinton because it would hurt Hillary Clinton’s chances of winning the White House in 2016, according to a recently published book.

As the Daily Wire reported Friday:

In his new book, “Ticking Clock: Behind The Scenes At 60 Minutes,” former CBS producer Ira Rosen writes of speaking with Maxwell in 2016, saying he asked for footage of Donald Trump that Epstein might have shot, only to have Maxwell respond, “If you get the tapes on Trump you have to do [Bill] Clinton.”

Rosen admits that at his meeting with Maxwell in early 2016, acting on a “hunch” that such tapes existed, he said, “I want the tapes. I know he [Epstein] was videotaping everyone and I want the tapes of Trump with the girls.” He writes that Maxwell replied, “I don’t know where they are,” tacitly confirming the tapes’ existence.

The former producer said he told Maxwell to “ask Epstein” because the “fate of the country is at stake. … Trump could be elected president and how would you feel if those tapes emerged after he was in office?”

“She gave me a stern look and pointed a finger in my face,” Rosen claimed, adding, “She said: ‘I am the daughter of a press baron. I know the way you people think. If you do one side, you must do the other. If you get the tapes on Trump you have to do Clinton.'”

Maxwell reportedly told Rosen Epstein never revealed to her where the alleged tapes were kept.

Bill Clinton has denied he ever visited Epstein’s Caribbean estate after court documents claimed the former president and “two young girls” were guests of Epstein’s in the early 2000s, Breitbart News reported in July.

However, photos published in August showed Bill Clinton receiving a neck massage from alleged Epstein victim Chauntae Davies, according to Breitbart News.

“The photos were snapped in September 2002 while Clinton, Epstein, and others were in transit to Africa for a humanitarian trip in Epstein’s private plane — Lolita Express,” the article read.

However, Davies stated that “President Clinton was a perfect gentleman during the trip and I saw absolutely no foul play involving him.”

Maxwell was arrested in July and an indictment said she allegedly “‘assisted, facilitated and contributed to Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minor girls by, among other things, helping Epstein to recruit, groom, and ultimately abuse’ girls under age 18,” Breitbart News reported.

Editor’s note: This article was updated to include Davies’ statement about Bill Clinto


Clinton Body Man: Bill Visited Pedophile Island, Had Affairs During Obama Admin

 

 

Doug Band was Bill Clinton's body man, but that doesn't fully describe it. For a while, Band essentially ran Clinton's life. He's also created with the Clinton Global Initiative which turned into the infamous Clinton Foundation.

Except that Jeffrey Epstein also claimed credit for it.

Band built Clinton Inc. into a huge international enterprise. And then got forced out by Chelsea Clinton. (Chelsea is probably the heroine in this story.) Epstein had Band's name in his little black book and Band had flown on the Lolita Express. But now Band has some unhappy tales to tell about the Clintons.

Most of these tales have to do with how much Band gave up for the Clintons and how Chelsea cut him out. Frankly, who cares. But it's the Epstein stuff that is getting people's attention.

Clinton made more than two dozen trips on Epstein’s jet around this time, Epstein’s flight logs show. In January 2003, according to Band, Clinton visited Epstein’s private Caribbean island, Little St. James. Band said it was one of the few trips he declined to go on in his time with Clinton. A Clinton spokesperson said the president had never been to the island and provided detailed travelogue entries of the period in question that did not contain a visit.

Except that the Clintons have been lying about Bill's travels on the Lolita Express for a long time.

Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” — even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com.

Clinton’s presence aboard Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 on 11 occasions has been reported, but flight logs show the number is more than double that, and trips between 2001 and 2003 included extended junkets around the world with Epstein and fellow passengers identified on manifests by their initials or first names, including “Tatiana.” The tricked-out jet earned its Nabakov-inspired nickname because it was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls.

Band, who seems to have plenty of ties to Epstein is now trying to associate Chelsea with Ghislaine Maxwell, which at this late date can't help be anything but spite, but he does have a few grenades to throw.

Band told Clinton that he believed he was allowing Chelsea to destroy Band’s reputation because, deep down, Clinton was guilty for the pain his infidelities had caused the family. Then Band said the unsayable: If Clinton wanted to have girlfriends, he should divorce Hillary and move on with his life. “It’s the honorable and right thing to do,” Band recalled saying. Clinton listened in cold silence, biting his lower lip. 

That's in 2011.

Gabriel Sherman doesn't seem to keen on nailing down the details of just what Band is saying here, but it sounds like Bill Clinton was still cheating on Hillary during the Obama administration and previously when Hillary Clinton was in the Senate.

Consider the timeline here. The 2012 election is coming up. Once Obama secures a second term, Hillary moves to begin her campaign planning for 2016.

Having this leak would have been bad for Hillary's political plans.

Sherman doesn't follow up on the obvious question here. But this is the media. And even though the Clintons are toast, and even though this whole piece is damaging to the Clintons, he never actually clarifies what Bard is alleging.


Clinton gang insider spills sleazy secrets, savages Chelsea

It begins. With no prospect of Bill or Hillary Clinton resuming high office, one former key insider of the Clinton Machine is spilling his guts and telling very unflattering stories about the family business.  Doug Band, who began as a White House intern, moved on the become “body man” and then key aide, went on to mastermind the post-presidency enrichment of the Clintons and (not incidentally) himself. But around 5 years ago, there was a great falling-out, predictably mostly about money, and now he has unburdened himself from various sleazy secrets of the Clinton empire with a series of interviews that has resulted in long article in Vanity Fair authored by Gabriel Sherman.  

I urge you to read the whole thing if you are interested in finally hearing some of the dirt that was such a huge part of the family of grifters that moved from Arkansas to the nation’s capital. But if you are in a hurry, The UK Daily Mail and the New York Post select pieces of gossip to focus on, with Brit paper highlighting Bill’s sabotage of Hillary’s 2008 presidential campaign and Chelsea’s suck-up to Ghislaine Maxwell to obtain access to yachts and cool homes, while the NYP focuses on Band’s rivalry with Chelsea and his disparagement of her abilities and her trading in her name.

Nobody comes out looking good here, which is exactly what one would expect from this bunch of crooks and schemers. Copyright concerns prevent me from excerpting as many sections as I would like. I will focus on Chelsea because if there is to be a future to a Clinton political dynasty, Chelsea will be the standard-bearer.

Band’s allies say he is the victim of a whisper campaign by Clintonworld rivals—Chelsea Clinton most of all—who were jealous of his favorite-son status and business success, which, they point out, has continued after he cut ties with the Clintons. “Doug’s made a lot of money. Was the Clinton connection helpful? One hundred percent. But it discounts how smart Doug is,” a Clinton donor said. The source was one of many Clintonworld insiders who would only speak on background. “The split is real and it is deep. There’s nothing in it for me to get in the middle of it,” a longtime Clinton adviser said, offering an explanation I heard echoed in my reporting. (snip)

 In the spring of 2011, Chelsea Clinton, then 31, became vice chairman of what would be the renamed Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation. After a peripatetic career that included stints at McKinsey, a hedge fund, and NBC News, it was as if she had finally claimed her birthright as heir to the family dynasty. (snip)

Clintonworld sources told me that Chelsea grew to resent Band. “Chelsea hated Doug because he was like a son to her father,” a Clinton friend said. Band took offense that Chelsea treated him at times like hired help. It was a combustible mix that was about to explode into personal grievance. “As a board member, Chelsea had a responsibility to ask questions about Foundation activities she didn’t understand or had reservation about. For some reason, Doug seemed to resent that,” a Clinton spokesperson said.

Around the time Band launched Teneo in June 2011, Chelsea summoned Band and his cofounder Declan Kelly to the Clinton office in Harlem. Band walked in to find Bill flanked by Chelsea and her husband, financier Marc Mezvinsky. According to Band, Chelsea said Band’s $2.5 million offer to put her dad on Teneo’s advisory board wasn’t enough. She wanted Band to give her and Mezvinsky an ownership position in Teneo. To Band, it felt like a shakedown. “I thought she was kidding or deeply sick,” he told me. Band looked across the table at Bill, but he sided with Chelsea. Band refused to give up an equity stake. The meeting ended badly. A Clinton family spokesperson denies that Chelsea asked for equity. (snip)

Chelsea heard from foundation officials that Band was “hustling” donors to become Teneo clients behind Bill’s back. Band heard that she accused Band of planting a Page Six item about troubles in her marriage, which he denied. Band, meanwhile, told foundation staff that Chelsea was vastly underqualified to be in charge. He found it especially galling that Chelsea accused him of cashing in on his Clinton connections when, in his view, Chelsea benefited far more from her famous last name. He told people she got paid $1.2 million by NBC, not $600,000 as was reported. She had a driver, security, a $10 million apartment, a wedding that cost $5 million, and traveled on private planes. “Every job she received was based on her name,” Band said, still vexed. “Mine was based on my reputation, experience, and what I had done.” (A Clinton spokesperson denied Chelsea was paid $1.2 million by NBC.) (snip)

Chelsea had ties to Epstein and Maxwell, Band said; he showed me a photo of Bill and Chelsea posing with Epstein and Maxwell at the King of Morocco’s wedding. Chelsea remained friends with Maxwell for years after the press revealed Maxwell was a close associate of Epstein’s. For instance, Chelsea invited Maxwell to her 2010 wedding at the Brooke Astor estate in Rhinebeck, New York, after Epstein had pleaded guilty in Florida to procuring sex from a minor.

“Ghislaine had access to yachts and nice homes. Chelsea needed that,” Band told me.

A Clinton family spokesperson said Chelsea was on friendly terms with Maxwell because of a mutual friend (Gateway computer founder Ted Waitt) and only took one yacht trip with Maxwell in 2009: “It wasn’t until 2015 that Chelsea became aware of the horrific allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell and she hopes that all the victims find justice. Chelsea was friendly with her because of Maxwell’s relationship with a dear friend. When that relationship ended, Chelsea’s relationship with her ended as well.”

In late October 2011, Band instructed Bill Clinton’s office to bar Maxwell from all Clintonworld events as a way of driving a wedge between Maxwell and Chelsea. “I knew in telling everyone to stop including Ghislaine that Chelsea and her father would be very angry. It made it harder for them to justify being close to her,” Band said.

 But keep in mind that omerta still governs many of the more central schemers in the Clinton machine, because they made peace with the Obama Machine, and now have or aspire to insider roles in what they assume will be a Biden presidency. People like John Podesta and Rahm Emanuel. I suspect most of them will go to their graves before they tell the truth.

Photo credit: Zero Emission Resource Organisation  CC BY 2.0  license


Introducing the Clinton Project

Fighting to restore the era of Democratic politics when crime and welfare were frowned upon, but banging interns wasn't

  •  
  •  
  •  

Joe Biden and the Democratic Party used to stand for American values. As a U.S. senator in the mid-1990s, he worked across the aisle to solve the country's under-incarceration problem. Years later, he voted against impeaching President Bill Clinton for hooking up with his intern and lying about it, because honestly who cares?

The Joe Biden and Democratic Party of 2021 represent an entirely different set of values—those of woke radicalism, coastal elitism, and #MeToo totalitarianism—and have devoted themselves to a movement whose core mission is to destroy America as we know it.

That is why we are announcing the Clinton Project, an effort to revitalize the Democratic Party by purging it of these toxic elements, to restore its soul by electing Republicans, and to reimpose the values that served it so well in the 1990s, when crime and welfare were frowned upon and banging interns wasn't.

While many of us are directly responsible for the Democratic Party's transformation into a woke cult, we will not apologize. This effort transcends partisanship and is dedicated to nothing less than the preservation of American principles that so many have fought for, on battlefields far from home and on social media, the modern-day equivalent of war.

These principles are under attack from the radical left. Chief among them is the sacred notion that politics is a business through which all Americans deserve the right to acquire vast personal wealth. Few, if any, have fought harder to advance this fundamental right than Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Alas, these once-proud standard-bearers for the Democratic Party have been cast aside by radical hijackers who insist the era of Big Government is just beginning. Even Ted Kennedy, the liberal lion whose worst "offense" was leaving a woman to drown in his car, would be unwelcome in today's party.

Over the next 15 fiscal quarters, our efforts will be dedicated to ingratiating ourselves with influential donors and activist groups to amass the funds necessary to defeat Biden and Bidenism at the ballot box—at least in theory. We intend to lead a broad coalition of values-oriented patriots in this fight for the soul of our country and have already secured generous commitments from the following groups:

  • National Republican Senatorial Committee
  • Public Investment Fund of Saudi Arabia
  • Clinton Foundation Expeditionary Force
  • People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals
  • Jerry Falwell Jr. and the Christian Unity Coalition for Kindness
  • Donate Now To Build The Wall For Real This Time, Inc.
  • MyPillow Action Alliance for Election Accountability
  • Ed Buck Legal Defense Fund PAC
  • Free Ghislaine Maxwell Initiative
  • Matt Lauer Association for Unjustly Accused Journalists

We might be old, unattractive, and out of shape, but we are the perfect soldiers for this fight. To our supporters, we promise to spend an unhealthy amount of time on Twitter making snide, belittling remarks about your political opponents and their children.

To our donors, we promise to never abandon you the way the modern Democratic Party abandoned Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein, founding members of the Clinton Project.

We look to Bill as our guide and inspiration. If it felt good, he did it. No questions asked. We look to Hillary as our lodestar, our sherpa in a pantsuit. More than anyone, she understands the importance of cashing in while you still can, of repudiating everything you've ever claimed to believe for personal gain, and owning your enemies with epic tweets.

Bidenism will be defeated, because it must. And when it is, we will be first to take credit.

Watch this space.

Yours in truth and honor,

Biff Diddle

Chief Digital Assassin and Security Liaison 

The Clinton Project


  Clinton Foundation Put On Watch List Of Suspicious ‘Charities’

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2015/04/charity-navigator-clinton-foundation.html

 

"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."  ----  Patricia McCarthy 


BILL CLINTON: SERIAL RAPIST and his enabler, Hillary!

MONICA’S VIDEO ON SERIAL RAPIST BILL CLINTON, HUSBAND OF SWAMP EMPRESS HILLARY CLINTON, CHARITY FOUNDATION FRAUDSTER*

Monica Lewinsky says Bill Clinton hinted she should perjure herself, arranged a farewell Christmas tryst before dumping her

 

https://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/11/video-serial-rapist-and-grifter-bill.html

 

 

Why is no one helping or caring about all these women? Who Hillary Viciously went after. The hypocrisy right now on the left is utterly stunning me. Bill Clinton-12 women on record telling their stories of him sexually assaulting them starting back in college! Imagine all the women who still have never told their stories about him?

 

Eileen Wellstone (1969)


Allegation: S-exual assault


Anonymous female student at Yale University (1972)


Anonymous female student at the University of Arkansas (1974)


Anonymous female lawyer (1977)


Juanita Broaddrick (1978)


R-ape


Carolyn Moffet (1979)


Elizabeth Ward (1983)


Sally Perdue (1983)


Paula Jones (1991)


Sandra Allen James (1991)


Christy Zercher (1992)


Kathleen Willey (1993)


Monica Lewinsky. 22-year-old intern working for the President

 

 

Becerra Hires Former Hillary Clinton Aide



Who Ignored Warnings About Harvey



Weinstein

Lena Dunham says she warned Clinton campaign in 2016 to stop associating with 'rapist' producer

  •  
  •  
  •  

Xavier Becerra, the controversial secretary of health and human services, has hired longtime Democratic strategist Kristina Schake to lead the agency's "public education efforts" on COVID-19.

Schake is perhaps best known for encouraging Michelle Obama to make an "undercover" shopping trip to a Target in Alexandria, Va., where an Associated Press photographer just happened to be waiting with a camera. She is credited with helping the former first lady establish her brand as an "accessible everywoman."

Schake's efforts to do the same for Hillary Clinton in 2016 were not as successful, for obvious reasons. In her role as deputy communications director, Schake was tasked with showcasing the failed candidate's "self-effacing, warm and funny side," according to the New York Times.

The communications guru understandably struggled to capture this side of Clinton during the campaign. More often, Schake was forced to defend the candidate's failure to comply with federal law or the campaign's refusal to release transcripts of the paid speeches Clinton gave to Wall Street financial firms.

Efforts to portray Clinton as likable and down-to-earth were also complicated by events like the celebrity-packed fundraising concert in Manhattan that took place less than a month before Election Day. Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced Hollywood executive and convicted rapist, helped produce the event.

Schake and other members of the Clinton campaign were reportedly urged to stop associating with Weinstein in light of the producer's longstanding reputation as a sexual predator. Celebrity activist Lena Dunham, for example, said she warned Schake in 2016 that it was "a really bad idea for [Weinstein] to host fundraisers and be involved [with the campaign] because it's an open secret in Hollywood that he has a problem with sexual assault."

Dunham said Schake had been surprised by the warning and promised to raise the issue with Clinton's campaign manager, Robby Mook. Regardless of whether the concerns about Weinstein were discussed among senior members of the campaign, no actions appear to have been taken in response.

Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill did not deny Dunham's claim about warning Schake and other campaign officials but questioned why the actress "would tell them instead of those who could stop [Weinstein]."

Days after losing the election, Bill and Hillary Clinton had dinner with Weinstein in part to discuss a documentary TV show about her campaign. Hillary has repeatedly insisted she had no idea that Weinstein was a notorious pervert.

"How could we have known?" Clinton asked the Hollywood Reporter in 2020 when asked about her relationship with the disgraced producer. "He raised money for me, for the Obamas, for Democrats in general. And that at the time was something that everybody thought made sense."

According to journalist Ronan Farrow, who wrote one of the first stories documenting the allegations against Weinstein, the sex pest tried to use his relationship with the Clintons to thwart his reporting. Farrow said his efforts to secure an interview with Hillary Clinton in 2017 prompted a call from Merrill, who expressed concern about the "big story" Farrow was working on about Weinstein's predatory history.

Clinton's team "tried to cancel the interview … over the Weinstein stuff," Farrow said.


Clinton Body Man: Bill Visited Pedophile Island, Had Affairs During Obama Admin

Wed Dec 2, 2020 

Daniel Greenfield

 

Doug Band was Bill Clinton's body man, but that doesn't fully describe it. For a while, Band essentially ran Clinton's life. He's also created with the Clinton Global Initiative which turned into the infamous Clinton Foundation.

Except that Jeffrey Epstein also claimed credit for it.

Band built Clinton Inc. into a huge international enterprise. And then got forced out by Chelsea Clinton. (Chelsea is probably the heroine in this story.) Epstein had Band's name in his little black book and Band had flown on the Lolita Express. But now Band has some unhappy tales to tell about the Clintons.

Most of these tales have to do with how much Band gave up for the Clintons and how Chelsea cut him out. Frankly, who cares. But it's the Epstein stuff that is getting people's attention.

Clinton made more than two dozen trips on Epstein’s jet around this time, Epstein’s flight logs show. In January 2003, according to Band, Clinton visited Epstein’s private Caribbean island, Little St. James. Band said it was one of the few trips he declined to go on in his time with Clinton. A Clinton spokesperson said the president had never been to the island and provided detailed travelogue entries of the period in question that did not contain a visit.

Except that the Clintons have been lying about Bill's travels on the Lolita Express for a long time.

Former President Bill Clinton was a much more frequent flyer on a registered sex offender’s infamous jet than previously reported, with flight logs showing the former president taking at least 26 trips aboard the “Lolita Express” — even apparently ditching his Secret Service detail for at least five of the flights, according to records obtained by FoxNews.com.

Clinton’s presence aboard Jeffrey Epstein’s Boeing 727 on 11 occasions has been reported, but flight logs show the number is more than double that, and trips between 2001 and 2003 included extended junkets around the world with Epstein and fellow passengers identified on manifests by their initials or first names, including “Tatiana.” The tricked-out jet earned its Nabakov-inspired nickname because it was reportedly outfitted with a bed where passengers had group sex with young girls.

Band, who seems to have plenty of ties to Epstein is now trying to associate Chelsea with Ghislaine Maxwell, which at this late date can't help be anything but spite, but he does have a few grenades to throw.

Band told Clinton that he believed he was allowing Chelsea to destroy Band’s reputation because, deep down, Clinton was guilty for the pain his infidelities had caused the family. Then Band said the unsayable: If Clinton wanted to have girlfriends, he should divorce Hillary and move on with his life. “It’s the honorable and right thing to do,” Band recalled saying. Clinton listened in cold silence, biting his lower lip. 

That's in 2011.

Gabriel Sherman doesn't seem to keen on nailing down the details of just what Band is saying here, but it sounds like Bill Clinton was still cheating on Hillary during the Obama administration and previously when Hillary Clinton was in the Senate.

Consider the timeline here. The 2012 election is coming up. Once Obama secures a second term, Hillary moves to begin her campaign planning for 2016.

Having this leak would have been bad for Hillary's political plans.

Sherman doesn't follow up on the obvious question here. But this is the media. And even though the Clintons are toast, and even though this whole piece is damaging to the Clintons, he never actually clarifies what Bard is alleging.

 

SWAMP EMPRESS HILLARY CLINTON

 

Leaked Julian Assange Message:

 

Hillary Is A ‘Well Connected, Sadistic, Sociopath’

 

http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/02/julian-assange-hillary-clinton-is.html

"But what the Clintons do is criminal because they do it wholly at the expense of the American people. And they feel thoroughly entitled to do it: gain power, use it to enrich themselves and their friends. They are amoral, immoral, and venal. Hillary has no core beliefs beyond power and money. That should be clear to every person on the planet by now."  ----  Patricia McCarthy -AMERICANTHINKER.com

CLINTON – OBAMA – TRUMPERNOMICS:

STEAL FROM THE AMERICAN MIDDLE-CLASS and

HAND IT TO THE SUPER RICH ON A SILVER

PLATTER!

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/05/clinton-obama-trumpernomics-rich-get.html

 

"The Wealth-X report shows that the world’s billionaire population has grown by 15 percent, to 2,754 people, since 2016, and that the wealth of these billionaires “surged by 24 percent to a record level of $9.2 trillion,” equivalent to 12 percent of the gross domestic product of the entire planet."

 

VIDEO:

JUDICIAL WATCH GOES AFTER CLINTON AND OBOMB… will they see prison time?

THE OBAMA-CLINTON SWAMP…. How close they came to destroying American democracy…. It’ what happens when two psychopath lawyers are permitted to run for office!

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2018/03/monty-pelerin-drain-swamp-becomes.html

“If the Constitution did not forbid cruel and unusual punishment, the sentence I would like to see imposed would place both Bill and Hillary Clinton in the same 8-by-12 cell.”    ROBERT ARVAY – AMERICAN THINKER com

 

HILLARY & BILLARY: THE CLINTON MAFIA

 

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY GLOBAL THIEVES

 

Their Looting of the Poor of Haiti

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-clinton-mafia-loots-poor-of-haiti.html

 

“The couple parlayed lives supposedly spent in “public service” into admission into the upper stratosphere of American wealth, with incomes in the top 0.1 percent bracket. The source of this vast wealth was a political machine that might well be dubbed “Clinton, Inc.” This consists essentially of a seedy money-laundering operation to ensure big business support for the Clintons’ political ambitions as well as their personal fortunes. The basic components of the operation are lavishly paid speeches to Wall Street and Fortune 500 audiences, corporate campaign contributions, and donations to the ostensibly philanthropic Clinton Foundation.”

 Hillary Clinton Declares ‘Shameless’ Republicans Are ‘Gun Worshipers’

WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 20: Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, speaks about former Rep. Ellen Tauscher, (D-CA) during her memorial service at the Washington National Cathedral, on May 20, 2019 in Washington, DC. Tauscher who served 12 years in Congress also serving as Under Secretary of State for arms control …
Mark Wilson/Getty Images
2:20

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Republicans “gun worshipers,” who are “shameless” because of their “huge advantage” due to the filibuster.

“You know, democracy is the balancing of interests and rights, and unfortunately at this time, the gun worshipers have a huge advantage because of the filibuster and because of their shameless exploitation of people’s unwarranted fears,” Hillary Clinton said.

“The opportunists on the other side, like Cruz and his ilk,” she continued, “they know better and they are in the position of trying to keep people really riled up and scared that sensible gun legislation like we had in the ‘90s for 10 years will somehow undermine their rights.”

“Well, what about the rights of all the rest of us? The rights of us to go to work, go shopping, go on dates to the movie theater, go to school, for heaven’s sake — what about the rest of us?” she asked.

The House of Representatives has proposed legislation to impose background checks on all gun sales and transfers, but the initiative has not totally satisfied Sen. Jon Tester (D-MT), who is an important vote in a Senate that is split 50/50 with 60 votes needed without the nullification of a filibuster or the tactic of reconciliation to circumvent the Senate Democrat’s vote shortfall.

“Background checks are important. I do believe that. But you can go too far on that ship pretty fast, too. I am for background checks. There is a caveat for handing down within the family and not requiring a background check,” Tester specified.

Even so, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) said Thursday he would bring up the legislation for a vote when the Senate returns April 12.

The full interview of Hillary Clinton will be released Thursday.

THE REASON AMERICA ENDED UP WITH THE LIFE-LONG WHITE-COLLAR CRIMINAL DONALD TRUMP IS BECAUSE THEY KNEW HILLARY CLINTON WOULD BE EVEN A GRATER THREAT.

 

History will thank Trump (and Obama) for keeping Hillary Clinton out of office

by Noemie Emery, Contributor | 

Win or may lose in November, there is one thing for which people will forever praise President Trump: Just when it counted, at the moment of crisis with all on the line, he threw his body into the line of incoming fire — and prevented Hillary Clinton from becoming president.

Deserving of thanks also is President Barack Obama, who in the 2008 primary defeated Clinton and kept her out of office through his two terms until Trump could step up to the job. The importance of what these people did becomes more impressive when one recalls that the plot to make Clinton president, whether she had earned it or not, had been decades in the making. Some say it stemmed from the 1980s in Arkansas, or even before that, when she and her husband met at Yale.

BLOG EDITOR: HILLARY FAILED IN ANY ENDEAVOR SHE ATTEMPTED OTHER THAN PAY-TO-PLA BRIBES SUCKING.

“Two for the price of one!" the pair chirped while campaigning in 1992, (happily described as the "Year of the Woman"), while Hillary was sold as a "New Kind of First Lady," seemingly meaning a sort of co-president, until healthcare blew up in her face. With that, she retired into more traditional duties.

Until, of course, she was called on again during the Monica Lewinsky scandal, which made her sympathetic at once to "traditional women," whom she at the beginning appeared to despise. And then at the end, she became "the wronged woman," (as opposed to the wrong one), sold as the victim-survivor deserving of everyone’s praise.

Because she had been forced to listen in excruciating detail to every last fact of her husband’s betrayal, she was given a seat in the Senate representing New York (which she never had lived in) and a fast track to her party’s nomination for president in 2008. With a record of failure on healthcare and no big bills or notable stands or speeches in the Senate, she was considered a shoo-in for president in 2008 — until derailed by the freight train called Obama, a uniquely gifted aspirational speaker whose life story and talents surpassed Clinton's own.

Setting her sights at once on 2016, she put in her time as a member of his Cabinet to gain more experience and made sure, with the help of her husband, that she would not be blindsided again. People who "deserted" her in 2008 for the dashing young stranger faced primary challenges where they didn’t expect them, or didn’t get funded, or saw promised funds not appear. Protected for too long by too many people, she was allowed once to try in 2008, failed, and then was encouraged to run all over again, this time with no legitimate competition running against her, and the winds of the world at her back.

Someday, historians will look back and try to explain just how and why the Republican field of 2016, with its young, diverse field of brilliant young people, managed to end up with Trump after much deep confusion. At the same time, the Democrats of 2020 had much the same field of comers but ended up with Rep. James Clyburn blowing the whistle and telling them to calm down and settle on Joe Biden before they ended up with any one of a large, noisy number of Biden's competitors.

Perhaps starting out with a large, diverse field of young people who haven’t been tested is not the best model. Now we just have to find one that is.

 

HILLARY CLINTON’S VISION:

 

SURRENDER OF OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX AND SUCKING IN GLOBAL BRIBES FOR THE PHONY CLINTON FOUNDATION

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2016/10/hillary-clintons-global-agenda-open.html

 

Even though it has gone virtually unreported by corporate media, Breitbart News has extensively documented the Clintons’ longstanding support for “open borders.” Interestingly, as the Los Angeles Times observed in 2007, the Clinton’s praise for 

globalization and open borders frequently comes when they are speaking before a wealthy foreign audiences and donors.



WILL GRIFTER, CHARITY FOUNDATION HUCKSTER AND SOCIOPATH LAWYER HILLARY CLINTON MURDER JULIAN ASSANGE?

 

SHE WANTS HIM DEAD! HIS PROXIMITY TO THE TRUTH THAT COULD PUT CLINTON IN PRISON IS A SERIOUS THREAT.

 

https://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2020/11/the-crimes-of-hillary-clinton-still-on.html

 

“If the Constitution did not forbid cruel and unusual punishment, the sentence I would like to see imposed would place both Bill and Hillary Clinton in the same 8-by-12 cell.”    ROBERT ARVAY – AMERICAN THINKER com

 

Obama’s Democratic Party administration launched a furious salvo of denunciations, with then Vice President Joe Biden calling Assange a “high-tech terrorist” and Hilary Clinton reportedly asking, “Can’t we just drone this guy?” This opened the floodgates to a torrent of demands from Republicans and the right-wing media for his assassination.

 

 

 Ten years since 

 

WikiLeaks published the

 

US diplomatic cables

 

Today is the tenth anniversary of “Cablegate” when WikiLeaks, leading a group of partner media organisations, began reporting on the contents of hundreds of thousands of leaked United States government diplomatic cables.

The documents revealed the vast scope and global reach of US imperialism’s criminal conspiracies against the international working class, and the brutality and corruption of capitalist governments the world over.

 

Julian Assange (Credit: Newsonline, Flickr)

Of historic significance in their own right, the publications followed WikiLeaks’s extraordinary releases earlier that year of the “Collateral Murder” video—showing the killing of Iraqi civilians, including journalists and first responders, by US soldiers—the Afghan War Logs and the Iraq War Logs.

These publications earned WikiLeaks, and in particular its founder, the journalist and publisher Julian Assange, the undying enmity of the ruling class. A vicious campaign of slander and pseudo-legal persecution was launched against Assange that continues to this day. He is currently locked up in London’s Belmarsh maximum security prison awaiting a verdict on his extradition to the US, where he faces a likely sentence of 175 years in the darkest corner of the American prison system, on charges under the Espionage Act.

Just a small sample of the diplomatic cables exposures gives a sense of their significance.

They revealed that the US had knowledge of and approved the military coup that toppled Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra in 2006. American officials discussed the possibility of a similar overthrow of the Pakistani government in 2009 with the country’s top general. In 2009, Washington privately supported the military coup against Honduran President Manuel Zelaya and worked to cover up the repression which followed.

US intelligence assets helped to engineer Kevin Rudd’s replacement as Australian prime minister by Julia Gillard in 2010, to ensure a continued Australian presence in the criminal US-led occupation of Afghanistan. Rudd was also targeted for suggesting America make minor accommodations to China’s growing influence in the Asia-Pacific region.

The cables demonstrated that the US government was fully aware of the torture, random arrests, and extra-judicial killings carried out by its ally Hosni Mubarak in Egypt. They proved Washington’s detailed knowledge of state corruption in Tunisia and exposed the government’s collaboration in abrogating the rights of Tunisian citizens detained in Guantanamo Bay. Governments in Pakistan and Yemen were shown to have collaborated with US drone operations in their own countries, responsible for the repeated massacres of civilians.

American officials were aware of an explosion at a BP gas rig in the Caspian Sea in 2008 but took no action to investigate the safety of the company’s other sites. Two years later, an explosion at a rig in the Gulf of Mexico killed eleven people and created the largest marine oil spill in history. During the 2009 Copenhagen climate conference, the US successfully bribed and blackmailed poor countries over development aid to gain support for a watering down of climate commitments.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ordered US embassies and UN representatives to gather personal information, including credit card and frequent flyer account numbers, internet passwords, work schedules and even DNA samples, from UN and foreign government officials. The only realistic purpose being to facilitate similar blackmail operations.

Yet more cables detailed the domination of the Nigerian state by Shell Oil.

Contrary to the claims of the US government that WikiLeaks recklessly endangered vulnerable sources named in the cables, a painstaking and collaborative process was established to review and redact the documents before publication. At Assange’s extradition hearing this September, journalists from all over the world testified to WikiLeaks’ “pioneering” use of encryption to protect sources and documents. The cables were scheduled to be released over the course of a year, on a country-by-country basis, making use of the expertise of local partner media organisations to ensure the appropriate redactions took place. In some cases, the US government itself provided suggestions for redactions.

Evidence heard at the hearing also established that it was Guardian journalist David Leigh who was responsible for allowing the release of tens of thousands of unredacted cables, which had been securely stored by WikiLeaks, in September 2011. In a hatchet-job on WikiLeaks, WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange's War on Secrecy, Leigh published the password to a secure online archive containing the cables, making them freely accessible.

Assange called the US State Department to warn them of an impending release but was ignored. He and the other WikiLeaks editors then took the decision to publish the unredacted cables themselves, since the documents were already in the public domain. WikiLeaks’s main media partners, the Guardian, the New York TimesDer SpiegelEl Pais, and Le Monde, used this event as a pretext to break off relations with the organisation and denounce its work.

The American government responded to the initial “Cablegate” publications with an embargo on WikiLeaks. Amazon removed the site from its web servers, PayPal cut off the WikiLeaks account and Mastercard and Visa prevented payments being made to the organisation. Bank of America stopped handling WikiLeaks payments and Swiss bank PostFinance froze Assange’s assets.

WikiLeaks also came under a massive “distributed denial-of-service” (DDoS) attack, effectively preventing users from accessing its site.

Obama’s Democratic Party administration launched a furious salvo of denunciations, with then Vice President Joe Biden calling Assange a “high-tech terrorist” and Hilary Clinton reportedly asking, “Can’t we just drone this guy?” This opened the floodgates to a torrent of demands from Republicans and the right-wing media for his assassination.

Assange was subjected to a sprawling conspiracy, as Sweden launched a manufactured sexual assault investigation to secure his arrest. Swedish prosecutors were encouraged by the UK authorities who used a Swedish extradition request to arbitrarily detain Assange in the Ecuadorian Assembly in London, where he had claimed political asylum. Pseudo-left political organisations abandoned Assange entirely over this smear campaign, or openly attacked him as a “rapist”, despite no charges ever being laid.

In April 2019, the US, UK and a new Ecuadorian government led by Lenin Moreno reached a deal to see Assange illegally seized from the embassy by British police.

THE DEMOCRAT PARTY’S BILLIONAIRES’ GLOBALIST EMPIRE requires someone as ruthlessly dishonest as Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama to be puppet dictators.

http://hillaryclinton-whitecollarcriminal.blogspot.com/2018/09/google-rigged-it-so-illegals-would-vote.html

1.     Globalism: Google VP Kent Walker insists that despite its repeated rejection by electorates around the world, “globalization” is an “incredible force for good.”

 

2.     Hillary Clinton’s Democratic party: An executive nearly broke down crying because of the candidate’s loss. Not a single executive expressed anything but dismay at her defeat.

 

3.   Immigration: Maintaining liberal immigration in the U.S is the policy that Google’s executives discussed the most.