Monday, March 14, 2011

Mexican Owned NEW YORK TIMES - Mouthpiece For LA RAZA FASCISM

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com


*

Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com and read articles and comments from other Americans on what they’ve witnessed in their communities around the country. While most of the population of California is now ILLEGAL, the problems, costs, assault to our culture by Mexico is EVERYWHERE. copy and pass it to your friends.



*

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SPENDS 37 MILLION... ONE MONTH... WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS!

*

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts

*





PERHAPS ONE OF THE REASONS STATES HAVE BACKED OFF FENDING FOR LEGALS AGAINST LA RAZA IS DUE TO OBAMA’S ASSAULT ON ARIZONA.



OBAMA’S ADMINISTRATION, FROM THE DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, NOW AN ADVOCACY FOR LA RAZA AND OPEN BORDERS, IS LA RAZA PARTY INFESTED.



OBAMA KNOWS HE WON’T PUNK A NATION AGAIN, SO HE’S COUNTING ON EVEN MORE ILLEGALS TO VOTE HIM IN AGAIN.



WELL, MAYBE!



MEANWHILE, MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL POUR OVER OUR BORDERS AND INTO OUR JOBS YEARLY. STATES ARE FACED WITH BANKRUPTCY DUE TO THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE THEY SUPPORT. ILLEGALS IN CA ALONE COLLECT $20 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES!!! LOS ANGELES COUNTY PAYS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR TO HEAVY BREEDING MEXICAN ILLEGALS!



OBAMA’S VISION IS SAME AS THAT OF THE U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, WHICH DEMANDS OPEN BORDERS TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED, THE FORTUNE 500, MOST OF WHICH ARE GENEROUS DONORS TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA, and MEXICO… OPEN BORDERS FOR A GRINGO SUBSIDIZED WORKFORCE OF “CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR.



WHO PAYS FOR THE STAGGERING CRIME TIDAL WAVE THAT COMES WITH THE MEXICAN INVASION?



*

KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED WITH HORDES OF ILLEGALS. BUT WHO PAYS FOR THEIR WELFARE AND CRIME SPREES?





“In Kansas and Oklahoma, even though Republicans control the legislatures and the executive branch, immigration proposals have encountered unusually vocal opposition from business.”





MEXICAN OWNED NEW YORK TIMES – MOUTHEPIECE FOR LA RAZA!



State Legislatures Slow on Immigration Measures

By JULIA PRESTON



Under newly fortified Republican control, many state governments started the year pledging forceful action to crack down on illegal immigration, saying they would fill a void left by the stalemate in Washington over the issue.

Now, with some legislatures winding down their sessions, the lack of consensus that has immobilized Congress has shown up in the legislatures as well, and has slowed — but not stopped — the advance of bills to penalize illegal immigrants.

No state has passed a law that replicates the one adopted last April in Arizona, which greatly expanded the powers of police officers to question the immigration status of people they stop.

Still, immigrant advocates in many states say the debate has clearly shifted in favor of tougher enforcement. They say they have had to fight just to hold the line on immigration issues that they thought were long settled.

Bills similar to Arizona’s are advancing in Florida, Kansas, Oklahoma and South Carolina. In Kansas and Oklahoma, even though Republicans control the legislatures and the executive branch, immigration proposals have encountered unusually vocal opposition from business.

Arizona-style bills died early in Colorado, and Nebraska decided this month to end its debate on one. Arizona’s law requires state and local police officers to inquire about the immigration status of anyone they stop if they have a “reasonable suspicion” the person is an illegal immigrant.

States also wrestled with other kinds of immigration initiatives. In New Mexico and Washington, Democrats backed by immigrant advocates defeated efforts to repeal laws granting driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants. Those two states and Utah are the only ones that give licenses to illegal immigrants.

In New Mexico, the repeal effort was championed by Gov. Susana Martinez, a Republican and a Hispanic, who had promised such a move in her campaign last year. A bill she supported was defeated by the Democratic-controlled State Senate on Wednesday. Instead, it approved a bill that added requirements, including fingerprinting, for immigrants without a Social Security number who apply for licenses.

If that bill wins final approval and the governor’s signature, it will create a two-tiered system in which licenses issued to people without proof of legal residence will be distinctively marked. According to license authorities, about 83,000 illegal immigrants are driving in New Mexico.

Ms. Martinez vowed to continue to fight for the repeal, although this is the final week of the legislative session. She called the current law “dangerous” and accused Democrats of “partisan political gamesmanship” for blocking its repeal.

Marcela Díaz, executive director of Somos Un Pueblo Unido, a group that led the license fight, said, “It’s a good sign that we will be able to maintain licenses for folks who are living, working and paying taxes in our state, regardless of their immigration status.”

But, she said, “We don’t take anything for granted.”

In Washington State, the debate over driver’s license rules polarized a state that has been relatively tolerant of illegal immigrants, an important part of the work force that picks apples. Several Democrats joined Republicans in supporting a repeal of the license law.

State fiscal authorities estimated that the repeal would cost about $1.5 million a year in new verification technology and monitoring expenses. That swayed some budget-minded lawmakers, and the bill was killed Monday.

“We saw tremendous momentum against us,” said Pramila Jayapal, executive director of OneAmerica, an immigrant advocate group. “But there was a realization that the debate was very divisive, and it was not going to solve the immigration problem.”

In Utah, where the Legislature finished its session on Thursday, lawmakers passed a novel package of three immigration laws. One was a revised version of the Arizona bill, without the most controversial parts. It requires the police to verify the immigration status of people they arrest on suspicion of committing a felony or serious misdemeanor. It allows, but does not require, the police to inquire about the status of people booked for lesser crimes.

“My bill is quite different than Arizona’s,” said State Representative Stephen Sandstrom, a Republican who was the main author of the measure.

Another law authorized the creation of a state guest worker program by 2013, and instructed the governor and the state attorney general to negotiate with federal authorities for a waiver to allow Utah employers to hire illegal immigrants.

Mr. Sandstrom said he was “completely against” the guest worker bill, which he called “a tragedy for the state.” He said that the law was unconstitutional and unlikely to take effect, but that it would still lure illegal immigrants to Utah.

Utah’s attorney general, Mark Shurtleff, acknowledged that the proposed waiver does not exist in federal immigration law.

“It’s a federal crime to employ an illegal alien,” he said in an interview. “I don’t know how you get a waiver for a federal crime. I’m going to try. But it’s definitely an uphill battle.”

Those two measures venture into terrain generally reserved for federal immigration authorities and are likely to draw legal challenges from advocacy groups, although they appear less likely to be challenged by the Obama administration.

Utah’s third new immigration law creates a labor commission to work with Nuevo León State in Mexico to bring laborers to Utah through existing federal guest worker programs. Mr. Shurtleff, who is a Republican, was the force behind that law.

The initiatives had the support of Utah businesses and law enforcement agencies.

In a national meeting of attorneys general last week, Mr. Shurtleff unveiled a proposal for a “national compact” to serve as a model for immigration legislation in Congress, based on Utah’s approach of enforcement measures paired with an opening to legal status for illegal workers.

In Texas, the biggest news from the immigration debate was a bill by State Representative Debbie Riddle, a Republican. Her legislation would penalize employers hiring illegal immigrants, with an exception for family households employing baby sitters or gardeners.

Immigrant groups and Democrats accused Ms. Riddle of hypocrisy, saying she wanted to deport illegal immigrants, except for her friends’ nannies.

Dan Frosch contributed reporting.

*

"Where there's a Mexican, there's Mexico!" President Calderon... SO TRUE, A MEXICAN DUMPSTER



*

MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com



*

“PUNISH OUR ENEMIES”… does that mean assault the legals of Arizona that must fend off the Mexican invasion, occupation, growing criminal and welfare state, as well as Mex Drug cartels???



Friends of ALIPAC,



Each day new reports come in from across the nation that our movement is surging and more incumbents, mostly Democrats, are about to fall on Election Day. Obama's approval ratings are falling to new lows as he makes highly inappropriate statements to Spanish language audiences asking illegal alien supporters to help him "punish our enemies."



*



“A recent Pew poll indicated that a very large percentage of Americans of Mexican descent regard themselves as Mexicans. Not Mexican-Americans, not American-Mexicans. Just Mexicans.”



“In Mexico, a recent Zogby poll declared that the vast majority of Mexican citizens hate Americans. [22.2] Mexico is a country saturated with racism, yet in denial, having never endured the social development of a Civil Rights movement like in the US--Blacks are harshly treated while foreign Whites are often seen as the enemy. [22.3] In fact, racism as workplace discrimination can be seen across the US anywhere the illegal alien Latino works--the vast majority of the workforce is usually strictly Latino, excluding Blacks, Whites, Asians, and others.”



Just over half, 54 percent, say it is important that they change to assimilate into society, yet about two-thirds, 66 percent, say Latinos should maintain their distinct culture.





*

EXPORTING POVERTY... we take MEXICO'S 38 million poor, illiterate, criminal and frequently pregnant

The Mexican Invasion................................................

Mexico prefers to export its poor, not uplift them

http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0330/p09s02-coop.html

*

http://blogs.mcclatchydc.com/mexico/2011/01/getting-over-the-border-fence-fast.html



*

Obama Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)





Article Link:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=240045



*

Lou Dobbs Tonight

Monday, September 28, 2009





And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.



*



CONTACT THE HISPANDERING LA RAZA PARTY PRESIDENT HERE:



You can contact President Obama and let him know of your opposition to amnesty for illegal aliens:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/



*

*

Are you connecting the dots finally? Below are further dots to connect.



1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state 20 governments.



*



2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.

Verify 20 at! : http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html



*



3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

*





4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English!

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

*





5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.

Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html



*



6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

*





7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html



*



8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html



*



9. $200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are cause d by the illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

*





10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US .

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt.01.html



*



11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S from the Southern border.

Verify at: Homeland Security Report: http://.com/t9sht

*



12. The National policy Institute, estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average cost of between $41 and $46 billion annually over a five year period.'

Verify at: http://www.nati onalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=deportation



*



13. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances to their countries of origin.

Verify at: http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm>;

*





14. ' The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration:! Nearly One million sex crimes Committed by Illegal Immigrants In The United States .'

Verify at: http: // http://www.drdsk.com/articles.html



*



The total cost is a whopping $ 338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR.









No comments: