Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOT EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL WATCH)
*
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts
*
FIGHTING FOR AMERICANS, AND AGAINST THE LA RAZA MEXICAN OCCUPATION:
THE LA RAZA DOCTRINE OF MEXICAN SUPREMACY IS THAT LAWS DON’T APPLY TO ILLEGALS!
OBAMA HISPANDERS TO THE LA RAZA PARTY WITH HIS NON-ENFORCEMENT, AND HIS ASSAULT ON OUR LAWS, SUCH AS HIS SUIT AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE OF ARIZONA!
*
“Two members of Utah’s delegation, U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R) and U.S. Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R) announced their opposition to Utah’s new guest worker amnesty law last week, declaring their belief that the law is unconstitutional.”
*
FAIR Legislative Update March 28, 2011
Lee and Chaffetz Stand Strong against Utah Guest Worker Amnesty Bill
Two members of Utah’s delegation, U.S. Senator Mike Lee (R) and U.S. Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R) announced their opposition to Utah’s new guest worker amnesty law last week, declaring their belief that the law is unconstitutional. Under Utah’s new law, H.B. 116, the state may grant illegal aliens who enter the state before May 10, 2011 guest worker permits, allowing them to continue living and working in Utah—in direct violation of federal law. The bill also allows these illegal workers to sponsor their illegal alien relatives (spouses and children) for permits that allow them to accompany the worker. H.B. 116 will go into effect as soon as the State of Utah obtains a waiver from the federal government or July 1, 2013, whichever is sooner.
Rep. Chaffetz, a member of the House Judiciary Committee and the House Immigration Reform Caucus, denounced the bill at a recent town hall meeting. (Salt Lake Tribune, Mar. 22, 2011) “I feel it’s unconstitutional, and I took an oath to uphold the Constitution,” he said. (Id.) Chaffetz pointed out that by issuing guest worker permits, Utah has “come to the point that the state is trying to do something that clearly is the purview of the federal government.” (Id.) Sen. Lee, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, made similar comments during an interview in his home state last week. “It’s just not going to happen,” he said. (Id.) “I know of no process in federal law that suggests that such a waiver could even be granted, nor do I know of any political inclination in Washington to let that happen….It would take a massive shift in federal law for [H.B. 116] to even be considered, and there’s no appetite to transfer that authority over to the states.” (Id.)
There is solid precedent for Chaffetz and Lee to argue Utah’s new law is unconstitutional. In 1976, the U.S. Supreme Court reaffirmed the federal government's exclusive authority to “regulate immigration.” (De Canas v. Bica, 424 U.S. 351, 354 (1976)) In doing so, the Court narrowly defined “regulation of immigration” as “essentially a determination of who should or should not be admitted into the country, and the conditions under which a legal entrant may remain.” (Id. at 355) Thus, by allowing the State of Utah to determine who receives guest worker permits and under which conditions a guest worker may remain, the Utah Legislature has usurped the federal government’s power to regulate who is admitted into the country and the conditions under which a person may stay.
But despite serious questions about the constitutionality of the law, Utah’s Attorney General, Mark Shurtleff, has been lobbying Department of Justice and White House officials to implement Utah’s new set of immigration laws—referred to as the “Utah Compact”—on a national scale. (Salt Lake Tribune, Mar. 9, 2011) Shurtleff presented the Compact to other state attorneys general at a national meeting earlier this month in Washington, D.C. (Id.) As part of his trip, Shurtleff also met with White House intergovernmental affairs staff as well as U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder. (Id.) “I think they were really impressed,” Shurtleff said in regards to his meetings. (Id.) “They didn’t commit to anything, but they were really excited about what Utah was able to accomplish.” (Id.)
Regardless of the Justice Department’s reaction, there is no process under federal law that would allow it to unilaterally invalidate the federal statutes that make it unlawful for illegal aliens to reside in the U.S. or for employers to hire illegal aliens. Thus, in granting Utah a waiver to implement its guest worker program, the Obama Administration would be affirmatively invalidating an act of Congress. However, if the Obama Administration refuses to grant Utah a waiver on the grounds that doing so would be unconstitutional, Utah’s guest worker bill will still go into effect on July 1, 2013. At that point, Americans will be watching to see if the Obama Justice Department sues the State of Utah as it sued the State of Arizona.
*
http://www.wehirealiens.com/browse/index.asp
*
“At the hearing, Dr. Rakesh Kochar, Associate Director for Research at the Pew Hispanic Center, testified that in the year following the official end of the recession (June 2009), foreign-born workers gained 656,000 jobs while native-born workers lost an additional 1.2 million jobs.”
*
Go to http://www.MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
Eight Out of Ten Illegal Aliens Apprehended in 2010 Never Prosecuted, Says Border Congressman
Thursday, March 17, 2011
By Edwin Mora
Washington (CNSNews.com) – An illegal alien apprehended by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency during the last fiscal year had an estimated 84 percent chance of never being prosecuted, according to figures compiled by the office of Rep. John Culberson (R-Texas).
Culberson submitted the figures for the record during a hearing Wednesday of the House Appropriations subcommittee on homeland security.
Of 447,731 illegal aliens apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol during fiscal year 2010 (which ended last September), only 73,263 (16.4 percent) were prosecuted, according to the submitted data. That means that 374,468 illegal aliens that were taken into custody (83.6 percent) were never prosecuted
*
Now you sound off. Should the United States taxpayer be funding the National Council of La Raza? THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA FOR MEXICAN SUPREMACY
By Dave Gibson (09/17/2006) http://americandaily.com/article/15577
(THESE FIGURES ARE DATED. SEE MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com for 2011 figures of American tax money handed over to advance Mexico’s occupation!
In 2005, the Latino group known as La Raza (The Race) was given $15.2 million in U.S. federal grants.
No comments:
Post a Comment