WATCH THE LA RAZA DEMS FIGHT HARD AGAINST E-VERIFY ON BEHALF OF THEIR LA RAZA PARTY BASE! VIVA LA RAZA LOOTING? THE DEMS DO IT EVERY DAY!
OBAMA DID NOT PUT A LA RAZA SUPREMACIST, HILDA SOLIS IN AS SEC. of (ILLEGAL) LABOR BECAUSE HE WAS GOING TO END THE UNEMPLOYMENT CRISIS BY PUTTING AMERICANS (LEGALS) BACK IN OUR JOBS!
LONG FIGHTING THE WAR FOR LA RAZA AGAINST THE AMERICAN WORKER IS OBAMA, FEINSTEIN (WHO HIRES ILLEGALS AT HER S.F. HOTEL), PELOSI (WHO HIRES ILLEGALS AT HER NAPA WINERY), BOXER, WHO WAS REELECTED BY ILLEGALS’ VOTES, REID (WHOSE STATE IS NOW 25% ILLEGAL), AND OBAMA WHO HAS HISPANDERED FOR THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES FROM HIS FIRST DAY IN OFFICE.
*
Newsmax
Obama's 'Hispanicazation' of America
Monday, January 10, 2011 08:28 AM
*
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/08/obamas-hispanicazation-of-america-most.html
OBAMA’S AMERICA: Open & Undefended Borders!
“What we're seeing is our Congress and national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
*
FAIR Legislative Update September 26, 2011
House Judiciary Committee Passes Mandatory E-Verify
In a 22-13 party-line vote, the House Judiciary Committee Wednesday passed legislation by Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) that would require all employers to use the E-Verify employment eligibility verification program. In addition to requiring all employers to use E-Verify, the legislation, entitled the “Legal Workforce Act” (H.R. 2885), makes several important changes including limiting the number of documents employers may accept to verify employment eligibility and increasing the penalties for employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens or fail to use E-Verify.
Members of the Committee offered a number of amendments to the bill during Wednesday’s markup, but accepted only two prior to passing the bill. The first amendment passed by the Committee, offered by Chairman Smith, was a minor change in order to return a provision of the bill to how it appeared in its previous version, H.R. 2164. Smith’s amendment would require employers to attest that they have verified the employment eligibility of an individual within the three-day verification period—which begins on the date an employer extends an offer of employment—rather than on the date of hire. (H.R. 2885 at §2; see Smith Amdt. #1; see also Roll Call Vote #1)
The other amendment passed by the Committee, offered by Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA), struck a provision of the bill in an effort to undermine support for the bill by the agriculture industry. (See Berman Amdt. #1; see also Roll Call Vote #4) The provision— a loophole for agricultural employers—would have modified and codified current regulations by providing that individuals engaged in seasonal agricultural employment returning to work for a previous employer are not considered new hires and thus not subject to verification through E-Verify. (H.R. 2885 at §2; 8 C.F.R. 274A.2(b)(1)(viii)(A)(8)) By striking this provision, the Committee closed a loophole that would have made it easier for illegal agricultural workers to slip through the new E-Verify mandate.
Among the rejected amendments was one authored by Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA) to strike the bill’s preemption provision barring state and local governments from enforcing immigration laws against employers (Section 6). (See Lofgren Amdt. #22, see also Roll Call Vote #6) By attempting to delete the preemption provision, Democrats this time tried to undermine the support of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce—support that is deemed key to the bill’s passage on the House floor.
Under Section 6, the only conduct of employers that state and local governments may punish through the revocation of a business license is failure to use E-Verify when and as required. This alone voids the portion of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting allowing states to revoke business licenses of employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens. (See FAIR Legislative Update, May 31, 2011) However, even with respect to states that wish to strip business licenses from employers that fail to use E-Verify when and as required, the language is ambiguous about who has the authority to determine whether the employer has actually complied with the program. If challenged, a court could plausibly interpret Section 6 to mean that state and local governments could only revoke the business license of an employer AFTER the federal government makes that determination. Such an interpretation seems even more likely when Section 6 is read in conjunction with Section 5. Section 5 provides that if an employer establishes that it has used E-Verify in good faith, it will be deemed to have met the requirements of the law unless the Department of Homeland Security proves by clear and convincing evidence that the employer knew the employee was an illegal alien.
Another amendment to the E-Verify bill that the Judiciary Committee rejected was Rep. Dan Lungren’s (R-CA) amendment to create a new agricultural guest worker program. Rep. Lungren and numerous other Members from agricultural states have made it clear that their support for mandatory E-Verify is contingent on the House also passing a sweeping new agricultural guest worker program. According to Lungren, E-Verify “won’t come to the House floor unless [agricultural workers] are taken care of.” (National Journal, Sept. 21, 2011) Rep. Lungren’s amendment to the E-Verify bill consisted of the same agricultural guest worker bill he introduced earlier this month, H.R. 2895. (See FAIR Legislative Update, Sept. 19, 2011) Lungren intended his bill to be an alternative to the agricultural guest worker program Rep. Smith proposed in H.R. 2847. (See FAIR Legislative Update, Sept. 12, 2011) The House Judiciary Committee was scheduled to mark up Rep. Smith’s agricultural guest worker proposal the same day as the mandatory E-Verify, but postponed consideration of the bill until October.
No comments:
Post a Comment