*
OBAMA’S PROMISE TO HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE:
OPTION ONE
AMNESTY, AND EXPANDED LA RAZA SUPREMACY – There is a reason
why his administration is infested with LA RAZA part members!
OPTION TWO
CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT
NO PRESIDENT IN HISTORY HAS SABOTAGED OUR BORDERS MORE AS
HE’S SQUANDERED TRILLIONS ON MUSLIM BORDERS.
THERE IS NOTHING BARACK OBAMA WILL NOT DO FOR THE ILLEGALS’
VOTES!
VIVA LA RAZA SUPREMACY? OBAMA IS FUNDING IT FROM YOUR WHITE
HOUSE WITH YOUR TAX DOLLARS!
*
Senators
Tell DHS To Stop Ignoring Illegal Alien Sanctuaries
By Judicial
Watch Blog
Created 4
Nov 2011 - 12:22pm
While
the Justice Department focuses on taking action against state laws to combat
illegal immigration, a group of U.S. Senators is asking the Obama
Administration to stop ignoring local ordinances that undermine federal laws by
offering undocumented aliens sanctuary.
In
battling local immigration control measures nationwide, the DOJ has claimed
that they conflict with federal
immigration law [1]and undermine the government’s
careful balance of immigration enforcement priorities and objectives. The Obama
Administration has made this argument recently in cases against Arizona and
Alabama.
But
what is the administration doing about local governments that refuse to cooperate
with federal immigration authorities and blatantly ignore the legal status of
arrested individuals? A group of Senate Judiciary Committee members posed the
question to Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano this week.
They
specifically mentioned Cook County Illinois where local authorities openly flip
the finger at the feds by refusing to report illegal immigrants who come in
contact with police, even dangerous criminals. In fact, in 2007 Judicial Watch
took legal action [2] against the Chicago Police
Department—which has a don’t-ask-don’t-tell immigration policy—after learning
of an illegal immigrant sanctuary resolution that was being considered by Cook
County’s Board of Commissioners at the time.
In
a letter [3] to Napolitano this week, the
Judiciary Committee members—senators Chuck Grassley (Iowa), John Cornyn
(Texas), Tom Coburn (Oklahoma) and Jeff Sessions (Alabama)—cite a recent
meeting with a high-ranking Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official
who confirmed that Cook County creates a major problem for enforcement efforts.
In fact, the ICE associate director of removal operations said Cook County’s
egregious example of sanctuary city policies presents “an accident waiting to
happen.”
So
the senators ask Napolitano: “We would like to know what specific steps have
been and will be taken by your Department to compel Cook County to reverse its
policy of ignoring immigration detainers. In addition, we would request an
overview of meetings held between federal officials and Cook County, including
any emails or other documentation that exist, to understand how the federal
government has been or is attempting to rectify the situation.”
Napolitano
is urged to take a direct role in the matter by the lawmakers who remind the
Homeland Security Secretary that Cook County’s ordinance creates a “serious
threat to the public’s safety” that requires Napolitano’s “immediate and
personal attention.” It’s a matter of national security, the veteran senators
assert.
Americans
shouldn’t hold their breath. The Obama Administration is too busy fighting
local measures that are viewed as “discriminatory” and “anti-immigrant” by the
open borders movement. In fact, the DOJ even created a secret group [4] within the bloated civil
rights division to monitor laws passed by states and local municipalities to
control illegal immigration.
Judicial
Watch has been a frontrunner in the nationwide battle to combat illegal
immigration and earlier this year filed a motion [5] on behalf of the Arizona
State Legislature in the Obama Administration’s lawsuit challenging its tough
law. JW has also sued police departments across the country for practicing
don’t-ask-don’t-tell immigration policies and has led an effort to shut down
taxpayer-funded day laborer centers. Read all about JW's work involving illegal
immigration here [6].
*
Obama Administration Refuses to Sue Sanctuary Cities
Obama Administration Refuses to Sue Sanctuary Cities
Less than a week after suing Arizona to block its immigration law, SB 1070, critics are pressing the Obama administration to go after “sanctuary cities” that deliberately look the other way when it comes to illegal immigration. The Department of Justice last week responded that it will not sue these cities, which prohibit local law enforcement from inquiring about an individual’s legal status or alerting immigration authorities when they encounter illegal immigrants, because it believes passive refusal to follow the law is not as egregious as Arizona’s passage of a law that “actively interferes” with federal law. Justice Department spokeswoman for Attorney General Eric Holder inexplicably argued, “There is a big difference between a state or locality saying they are not going to use their resources to enforce a federal law, as so-called sanctuary cities have done, and a state passing its own immigration policy that actively interferes with federal law.” (The Washington Times, July 14, 2010).
Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX), who authored the 1996 federal law which requires states and localities to cooperate with federal authorities on immigration enforcement, criticized the Justice Department’s politically convenient stance on sanctuary cities. "For the Justice Department to suggest that they won't take action against those who passively violate the law …. is absurd," said Rep. Smith. "Will they ignore individuals who fail to pay taxes? Will they ignore banking laws that require disclosure of transactions over $10,000? Of course not." (The Washington Times, July 14, 2010).
Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has also noted the irony of the Obama administration’s refusal to sue localities to strike down their sanctuary policies, which she said could also be considered a “patchwork” of immigration laws across the country. (Brewer Statement, July 6, 2010). Senator David Vitter (R-LA) similarly noted, “This administration’s idea of immigration enforcement is to go after the states and local officials actually trying to enforce the laws on the books. They are demonizing those that look to protect our border and end illegal immigration while giving a wink and nod of approval to sanctuary cities that don't enforce our laws.” (Vitter Press Release, July 15, 2010).
Less than a week after suing Arizona to block its immigration law, SB 1070, critics are pressing the Obama administration to go after “sanctuary cities” that deliberately look the other way when it comes to illegal immigration. The Department of Justice last week responded that it will not sue these cities, which prohibit local law enforcement from inquiring about an individual’s legal status or alerting immigration authorities when they encounter illegal immigrants, because it believes passive refusal to follow the law is not as egregious as Arizona’s passage of a law that “actively interferes” with federal law. Justice Department spokeswoman for Attorney General Eric Holder inexplicably argued, “There is a big difference between a state or locality saying they are not going to use their resources to enforce a federal law, as so-called sanctuary cities have done, and a state passing its own immigration policy that actively interferes with federal law.” (The Washington Times, July 14, 2010).
Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX), who authored the 1996 federal law which requires states and localities to cooperate with federal authorities on immigration enforcement, criticized the Justice Department’s politically convenient stance on sanctuary cities. "For the Justice Department to suggest that they won't take action against those who passively violate the law …. is absurd," said Rep. Smith. "Will they ignore individuals who fail to pay taxes? Will they ignore banking laws that require disclosure of transactions over $10,000? Of course not." (The Washington Times, July 14, 2010).
Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has also noted the irony of the Obama administration’s refusal to sue localities to strike down their sanctuary policies, which she said could also be considered a “patchwork” of immigration laws across the country. (Brewer Statement, July 6, 2010). Senator David Vitter (R-LA) similarly noted, “This administration’s idea of immigration enforcement is to go after the states and local officials actually trying to enforce the laws on the books. They are demonizing those that look to protect our border and end illegal immigration while giving a wink and nod of approval to sanctuary cities that don't enforce our laws.” (Vitter Press Release, July 15, 2010).
*
8 New American Gateways For
Immigrants
By Neema P. Roshania, Kiplinger.com
Jun 29th, 2010
The economic recovery may be slow and uncertain. Immigration
remains a hot button political issue. But there's one positive trend that will
keep benefiting smaller cities in the years ahead: Their growing appeal to
immigrant poppulations.
Though New York, Los Angeles, Miami, Chicago and other large U.S. cities remain hubs for immigrants,
newcomers from abroad are increasingly settling in smaller communities across
the U.S., lured by a lower cost of living, more job opportunities, and a
support structure of fellow immigrants. In return, these communities get a
rejuvenated work force and a consumer base.
Here are eight rapidly emerging gateway communities for
immigrants. All are likely to remain popular with foreign newcomers, despite stepped-up
enforcement of federal immigration laws. Some may surprise you.
Benton/Washington Counties,
Ark.
Home to large employers such as Wal-Mart in Bentonville and Tyson Foods in nearby Springdale, these northwest Arkansas counties have seen enormous
growth in their immigrant populations over the past decade.
Foreign born residents now make up more than 20% of Springdale's population. The area's chicken farms, construction
industry, corporate headquarters, and low cost of housing remain a strong
magnet.
With Hispanics accounting for most of the increase, the
region is seeing more ethnic bakeries, restaurants, media outlets, and other
businesses. The once nearly homogeneous local school districts have added
English as a second language to their curricula in addition to special programs
to help involve parents in their children's education.
Portland and Salem, Ore.
(Marion/Multnomah counties)
The growth of the area's technology industry draws highly skilled immigrant workers
to northwest Oregon, where they're joining earlier arrivals -- refugees from
Southeast Asia, Africa, eastern Europe and Russia.
Fairfax County, Va.
In this large suburban county bordering Washington, D.C., immigrants make up almost 30% of the population. The
recession hasn't been felt here as much as it has in other parts of the country
and construction, and service jobs are still plentiful. Fairfax County is across the Potomac River from the nation's
capital, which, along with other large cities, has long been a draw for
immigrants.
There's also a strong immigrant presence among service
workers, especially in health care, restaurants, and cleaning services. Nearly
40% of the region's immigrant population arrived within the past decade. Many
own their own businesses. And they are encouraging more family members and
friends from the old country to join them.
Shelbyville, Tenn. (Bedford
County)
Though the foreign born population in Shelbyville hovers around the national average, the small city and its
environs have become a mecca for refugees from Egypt, Myanmar (formerly known
as Burma), and Somalia. There are jobs in Shelbyville's food processing plants and other factories.
Cape Coral, Fla. (Lee County)
Southwest Florida's Gulf Coast has strong agriculture and service sectors. In
2000, Cape Coral's foreign born population was 8.7%, relatively low compared
with national average of 11.1%. In the past decade it has increased by about
250% -- putting it above the national average.
Boise, Id. (Ada County)
Attracted to the area by job opportunities in agriculture
and an affordable cost of living, Boise's immigrant population has climbed by more than 50% over the
past decade.
Gwinnett County, Ga.
The foreign born population in Gwinnett County has more than doubled since 2000, and now represents about
25% of the county's total population. Drawn to the area by an abundance of jobs
in the service sector and the low cost of housing, the immigrants are mostly
Hispanic. They are carving out a livelihood in a region where blacks have
traditionally been the most visible minority. Gwinnett also has one of the
highest rates of illegal immigration in the U.S. -- authorities estimate that
half of all foreign born residents of the county are unauthorized.
Raleigh-Durham-Cary, N.C.
(Wake/Durham/Chatham Cos.)
North Carolina's 394% immigrant growth rate in the 1990s was the fastest
among Southern states, and the trend has continued in the 21st century. The Raleigh-Durham area has been hub to much of this growth.
The draw? Affordable housing and jobs at Research Triangle Park -- one of the country's
largest technology development centers -- as well as in the construction and
service sectors. The recession and stricter enforcement of immigration laws in
the Tar Heel State are slowing immigration growth -- at least for now. But many
experts think migration could pick up again as the economy recovers.
Sources: Census Bureau, University of Southern California,
Moody's Economy.com
Showing page 1 of 1
No comments:
Post a Comment