DOJ Fast and Furious Document Dump: More Evidence Holder
Lied to Congress
In another "document dump" late last Friday evening, the Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) released 500 pages of records, including internal email correspondence, regarding the exploding scandal known as "Fast and Furious," where the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) allowed guns to "walk" into the hands of Mexican drug cartels, leading to the death of at least one U.S. federal agent. NPR detailed one of the key finds: For the first time, the Justice Department has made public a series of sensitive messages that passed to the highest levels of the agency within hours of an ambush that killed a U.S. border patrol agent along the Southwest border in December 2010, igniting a national scandal over a gun trafficking investigation gone wrong.… |
|
|
And
yet, we still do not have an investigation of Holder's alleged perjury. Perhaps
it is because he continues to get cover not only from President Obama, but from
congressional Democrats as well.
On Wednesday, one day before Holder testified again before the House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, congressional Democrats rallied around the attorney general releasing a report that places the blame squarely on the shoulders of local ATF agents in Phoenix in an effort to shift the focus from the Obama DOJ. Senate Republican Charles Grassley, who has been helping lead the charge to investigate Fast and Furious, said the report did not "pass the laugh test." House Committee on Government Reform and Oversight Chairman Darrel Issa (R-CA) did not back down one bit from his previous threats to hold Holder and DOJ officials in contempt of Congress for failing to turn over documents regarding the scandal in what he suggests is a massive cover-up. Meanwhile, in his congressional testimony on Thursday before Issa's committee Holder continued to contemptuously deflect criticism and blame. While noting that, thus far, no one at the DOJ has been disciplined for the Fast and Furious scandal, Holder then used his testimony to blame the scandal on Congress for failing to pass more gun control laws. He also suggested the whole Fast and Furious mess was just a political witch hunt. As reported by The Washington Examiner: Attorney General Eric Holder attributed the difficulty preventing gun-trafficking into Mexico to weak gun controls laws, when he blamed on the U.S. House, with particular reference to the House investigators asking him about Operation Fast and Furious.This was no "flawed law enforcement operation." This was an unlawful, dangerous and deadly blunder by the Obama DOJ that has led to the death of one person, and will likely kill many more - by Holder's own admission. The attorney general must pay for this monstrous scandal with his job. A criminal investigation of his possible perjury is also warranted. As you know, Judicial Watch has commenced a full investigation into the Fast and Furious scandal, filing Freedom of Information Act requests and related lawsuits. (You can read more about our investigation here.)
PERHAPS HOLDER AND OBAMA SHOULD DECIDE IF THEY WORK FOR THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE, OR THE LA RAZA NARCOmex INVADERS!
Attorney General Eric Holder Disgusted by Personal Attacks at Fast and
Furious Hearing
By
Jason Ryan | ABC OTUS News – 22 hrs ago
Attorney
General Eric Holder faced attacks on his character and tenure as attorney
general at a congressional committee hearing on the gun program known as
"Fast and Furious," which was run by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco,
Firearms and Explosives.
Holder
defended his record but the hearing yielded little information about the gun
trafficking investigation. Instead, Republican members of the House Oversight
and Government Reform Committee attacked Holder for previous testimony, his
role in the pardoning of Marc Rich at the end of the Clinton administration and
his decision to open a criminal investigation into torture by CIA operatives
against terrorism detainees.
The
House committee has been investigating the actions by ATF and Justice
Department officials involving the gun trafficking case that resulted in about
2,000 guns being allowed to go to drug cartels and criminal groups in Mexico.
The ATF operation took a tragic toll when two guns linked to the operation were
found near slain U.S. Border Patrol agent Brian Terry on Dec. 14, 2010.
A
staff memo prepared by congressional investigators working for the committee
with Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa,
released before the hearing offered a new detail about the ATF's failure to
identify two targets in its gun trafficking case. However, the issue was
glossed over by committee members in their questioning.
The
report noted that one of the two members of a drug cartel had already been
identified in a DEA wiretap log and was under investigation by the DEA and the
FBI.
The
report noted, "DEA and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) had
jointly opened a separate investigation specifically targeting these two cartel
associates. As early as mid-January 2010, both agencies had collected a wealth
of information on these associates. Yet, ATF spent the next year engaging in
the reckless tactics of Fast and Furious in attempting to identify them."
"During
the course of this separate investigation, the FBI designated these two cartel
associates as national security assets. In exchange for one individual's guilty
plea to a minor count of 'Alien in Possession of a Firearm,' both became FBI
informants and are now considered to be unindictable." the report said.
"This means that the entire goal of Fast and Furious - to target these two
individuals and bring them to justice - was a failure."
Holder
faced some tough questioning about why the Justice Department has turned over
only 6,400 pages of documents when the Justice Department inspector general has
access to an estimated 80,000 pages of documents as part of the internal
review.
"It
appears as though we're being stonewalled, and there's something that's being
hidden," said Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind.
Justice
Department officials have said that the inspector general's review allows the
internal DOJ investigators to have access to all grand jury materials and all
unredacted documents such as wiretap transcripts.
"I've
heard, you know, the magic word here, 'cover-up,' and I want to make clear that
there is no attempt at any kind of cover-up. We have shared huge amounts of
information. We will continue to share huge amounts of information,"
Holder said later in the hearing.
Holder
faced a torrent of questions about his character and his time at the Justice
Department.
Rep.
Ann Marie Buerkle, R-N.Y., asked Holder, "So let me ask it this way: How
many more Border Patrol agents would have had to die as a part of Operation
Fast and Furious for you to take responsibility?"
Holder
bristled at the question telling the congresswoman, "You know, I mean,
really, is that the way in which you want to be seen, you want to be known? You
know, I should be held accountable for, certainly, my role in whatever I did or
didn't do in connection with the supervision of Fast and Furious, but I'm
attorney general of the United States and I should also be accountable and
perhaps even given some credit - imagine that - given some credit for the
things that this Justice Department has done under my leadership, whether it
deals with national security, revitalized antitrust, revitalized civil rights
enforcement effort. And so one has to balance all of these things.
"I
get up every day and try to do the best job that I can. I have great faith in
the people who work in the department. And, you know, that kind of question, I
think, is, frankly - and again, respectfully - I think that's beneath a member
of Congress," Holder said.
Although
Issa tried to limit the scope of the hearing to only focus on Fast and Furious
controversy, Rep. Tim Walberg, R-Mich., blasted Holder for his handling of the
Marc Rich pardon and for Holder's decision to reopen a criminal investigation
into abuse and torture of terrorism detainees by CIA operatives and
interrogators.
"Given
the decision to almost engage in character assassination, I'm going to respond
to at least some of that." Holder said. "I'm the attorney general of
the United States. OK? And when it comes to deciding what I'm going to
investigate, how I'm going to investigate, I take into account a wide variety
of things. The decision I made to open up those CIA matters - and I was aware
that this was something that was opposed by a great many people … that
investigation has run its course. We are at a point where we are about to close
those investigations."
Towards
the end of the hearing, Rep. Raul Labrador, R-Idaho, told Holder that he should
resign and said, "You either lied or you were grossly incompetent in your
actions when it came to finding out about Fast and Furious and your handling of
this matter."
Labrador
then showed the committee a series of statements Holder had made about the Marc
Rich pardon, which drew the ire of a disgusted attorney general.
"That
was among the worst things I think I've ever seen in Congress," Holder
said, "You took a whole series of statements out of context, with no
context."
Holder
added, "The Marc Rich thing was considered in my confirmation, talked
about it then. There is a whole bunch of things that I could say about what you
just did, and maybe this is the way you do things, you know, in Idaho or
wherever you're from. But understand something. What I've done - I'm proud of
the work that I've done as attorney general of the United States. And looked at
fairly- I think that I've done, you know, a pretty good job. Have I been
perfect? No. Have I made mistakes? Yes. Do I treat the members of this
committee with respect? I always hope that I do. And what you have just done
is, if nothing else, disrespectful. And if you don't like me, that's one thing,
but you should respect the fact that I hold an office that is deserving of
respect. And, you know, maybe you're new to this committee. I don't know. I
don't know how long you've been here. But my hope would be that, you know, we
can get beyond that kind of interaction, that kind of treatment of a witness,
whether it's me or somebody else, because I think in some ways what you did was
fundamentally unfair, just not right."
|
No comments:
Post a Comment