MEXICO ORDERS OBAMA TO LET MORE OF THEIR LOOTERS IN!
OBAMA RESPONDED THAT HIS ADMINISTRATION IS ALREADY INFESTED
WITH LA RAZA SUPREMACIST. THE ONLY THING ELSE HE COULD DO FOR ILLEGALS IS FLY
THE MEX FLAG OVER THE LA RAZA WHITE HOUSE!
THERE ARE MORE BILLIONAIRES IN MEXICO THAN IN SAUDI ARABIA.
BY EXPORTING MILLIONS OF MEXICO'S POOR, PREGNANT AND CRIMINALS OVER OUR BORDERS
TO LOOT AMERICAN, THE RULING CLASS OF MEXICO CAN MORE EASILY CONTROL THE
ECONOMY AND KEEP IT IN THEIR POCKETS!
THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD IS CARLOS SLIM, WHO OWNS THE
NEW YORK TIMES, IF YOU'VE WONDERED WHY THE TIMES IS SUCH A PROPAGANDA
MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA PROPAGANDA AND OPEN BORDERS!
*
“Mexico,
a country where roughly 40% of the population lives in poverty, has 10 people
on FORBES Magazine's 2008 list of the world's billionaires. While these
individuals have made important contributions to society via the expansion of
services to marginalized areas, job creation, and charitable donations, this
concentration of wealth and economic power hinders Mexico's ability to realize
more and deeper levels of competition in key industries.”
Posted: 09 Mar 2011 07:25 PM PST
The latest Forbes rich list has come out and it’s little surprise that the wealthy got even more money. But before we consider the details, let me bring up an interesting Wikileaks diplomatic cable on Mexico’s rich.
Analysts
talk a lot about how Wikileaks cables have harmed U.S. diplomacy. But I find
myself turning to them for renderings of inequalities in other countries, and
tips on corruption.
In
any case, this
July 2007 cable
is titled “Who are Mexico’s Wealthiest Business Leaders,” and it starts out
thus:
“Mexico, a country where
roughly 40% of the population lives in poverty, has 10 people on FORBES
Magazine's 2008 list of the world's billionaires. While these individuals
have made important contributions to society via the expansion of services to
marginalized areas, job creation, and charitable donations, this
concentration of wealth and economic power hinders Mexico's ability to
realize more and deeper levels of competition in key industries.”
The
wealth of the richest Mexicans represented 10 percent of the value of the
nation’s gross domestic product, the cable says.
It
goes on to say that some of the richest Mexicans took advantage of
shortcomings in its political system to expand their wealth and create private
sector monopolies while “leaving the average Mexican out in the cold.”
“The
negative aspects of this concentration of wealth and economic power cannot be
overlooked because many of these individuals control the monopolies and
oligopolies that hold back economic growth. SLIM, Salinas, and others have
used their influence to sway economic policy and work the system to further
their business interests and hinder their competitors. A World Bank report
found that billionaire-controlled companies in Mexico are more likely to be
involved in monopolistic practices and win amparos, or judicial stays, which
allow them to delay regulatory rulings against them while they mire the
process in appeals. The result is that SLIM still dominates the telecom
market; GE, NBC and others are unable to break into the broadcasting market;
and the Federal Competition Commission (Cofeco) remains unable to impose
significant penalties on anti-competitive conduct.”
If
Forbes is accurate, the concentration of wealth is increasing. While more
than 40 million Mexicans live in poverty, the world's richest man, Mexican
tycoon Carlos Slim, saw his wealth expand ever more, growing to $74 billion.
That’s a rise of $20.5 billion in a year. Slim is in the photo above, to the
right of President Felipe Calderon. Slim’s businesses include
telecommunications, an airline, a bank, a construction company, department
stores (including Sanborns), restaurants, music outlets, insurance, auto
parts, and ceramic tiles.
Coming
in at No. 39 on the rich list is another Mexican, German Larrea Mota Velasco
and family, with a fortune estimated at $16 billion. The chairman of copper
and silver miner Grupo Mexico saw his fortune climb $6.3 billion in the past
year, Forbes says.
At No. 66 on the list is
Alberto Bailleres Gonzalez, of the mining concern Industrias Penoles, with
$11.9 billion. At No. 112 is Ricardo Salinas Pliego, the tycoon owner of TV
Azteca, with $8.2 billion. At No. 268 is Jeronimo Arango with $4 billion,
largely accumulated from the sale of Cifra, their self-made retail chain, to
Wal-Mart. New to the list at No. 310 is Daniel Servitje Montull and family,
with $3.5 billion made from Grupo Bimbo, the world’s largest breadmaker. At
No. 512 is Emilio Azcarraga Jean, heir to the Televisa fortune with a net
worth of $2.3 billion. Then comes Roberto Gonzalez Barrera and family with a
$2 billion fortune from tortillas. At No. 993 is Roberto Hernandez Ramirez
with a $1.2 billion fortune from sale of Banamex, the bank. With a slim $1
billion fortune (chump change!) is Alfredo Harp Helu at No. 1140, who also
made a fortune from the sale of Banamex. Tied in last place at No. 1140 is
Joaquin Guzman Loera, the head of the Sinaloa narcotics cartel.
So
which one is the most admirable and which is the biggest rogue?
|
*
“Among the commodities that Mexico exports is
labor power. US corporations depend on a supply of labor power from Mexican
workers for their plants in Mexico and the United States. The remittances of
the latter, a major source of income for millions of Mexican families, are
crucial for Mexico’s GDP. Those US and foreign plants that operate on the
Mexican side of the US-Mexico border, across from US cities such as Laredo,
McClaren and El Paso, Texas, and San Diego, California, depend on a constant
migration of low-wage workers from southern to northern Mexico. Despite the
draconian controls on immigration, the integration of the labor markets is such
that, according to one estimate, a 10 percent increase in wages for unskilled
workers in the US over time results in a 1.8 percent rise in Mexican wages.”
*
EXPORTING
POVERTY... we take MEXICO'S 38 million poor, illiterate, criminal and
frequently pregnant
........
where can we send AMERICA'S poor?
The Mexican Invasion................................................
Mexico prefers to export its poor, not uplift them
March 30, 2006 edition
http://www.csmonitor.com/2006/0330/p09s02-coop.html
Mexico prefers to export its poor, not uplift them
At this week's summit, failed reforms under Fox should be
the issue, not US actions.
By George W. Grayson WILLIAMSBURG, VA.
At the parleys this week with his US and Canadian
counterparts in Cancún, Mexican President Vicente Fox will press for more
opportunities for his countrymen north of the Rio Grande. Specifically, he will
argue for additional visas for Mexicans to enter the United States and Canada,
the expansion of guest-worker schemes, and the "regularization" of
illegal immigrants who reside throughout the continent. In a recent interview
with CNN, the Mexican chief executive excoriated as "undemocratic"
the extension of a wall on the US-Mexico border and called for the
"orderly, safe, and legal" northbound flow of Mexicans, many of whom
come from his home state of Guanajuato. Mexican legislators share Mr. Fox's
goals. Silvia Hernández Enriquez, head of the Senate Committee on Foreign
Relations for North America, recently emphasized that the solution to the
"structural phenomenon" of unlawful migration lies not with "walls
or militarization" but with "understanding, cooperation, and joint
responsibility." Such rhetoric would be more convincing if Mexican
officials were making a good faith effort to uplift the 50 percent of their 106
million people who live in poverty. To his credit, Fox's
"Opportunities" initiative has improved slightly the plight of the
poorest of the poor. Still, neither he nor Mexico's lawmakers have advanced
measures that would spur sustained growth, improve the quality of the
workforce, curb unemployment, and obviate the flight of Mexicans abroad.
Indeed, Mexico's leaders have turned hypocrisy from an art form into an exact
science as they shirk their obligations to fellow citizens, while decrying
efforts by the US senators and representatives to crack down on illegal
immigration at the border and the workplace. What are some examples of this
failure of responsibility? · When oil revenues are excluded, Mexico raises the
equivalent of only 9 percent of its gross domestic product in taxes - a figure roughly
equivalent to that of Haiti and far below the level of major Latin American
nations. Not only is Mexico's collection rate ridiculously low, its fiscal
regime is riddled with loopholes and exemptions, giving rise to widespread
evasion. Congress has rebuffed efforts to reform the system. Insufficient
revenues mean that Mexico spends relatively little on two key elements of
social mobility: Education commands just 5.3 percent of its GDP and healthcare
only 6.10 percent, according to the World Bank's last comparative study. · A
venal, "come-back-tomorrow" bureaucracy explains the 58 days it takes
to open a business in Mexico compared with three days in Canada, five days in
the US, nine days in Jamaica, and 27 days in Chile. Mexico's private sector
estimates that 34 percent of the firms in the country made "extra
official" payments to functionaries and legislators in 2004. These bribes
totaled $11.2 billion and equaled 12 percent of GDP. · Transparency
International, a nongovernmental organization, placed Mexico in a tie with
Ghana, Panama, Peru, and Turkey for 65th among 158 countries surveyed for
corruption. · Economic competition is constrained by the presence of
inefficient, overstaffed state oil and electricity monopolies, as well as a
small number of private corporations - closely linked to government big shots
-that control telecommunications, television, food processing, transportation,
construction, and cement. Politicians who talk about, much less propose,
trust-busting measures are as rare as a snowfall in the Sonoran Desert.
Geography, self-interests, and humanitarian concerns require North America's
neighbors to cooperate on myriad issues, not the least of which is immigration.
However, Mexico's power brokers have failed to make the difficult decisions
necessary to use their nation's bountiful wealth to benefit the masses.
Washington and Ottawa have every right to insist that Mexico's pampered elite
act responsibly, rather than expecting US and Canadian taxpayers to shoulder
burdens Mexico should assume.
*
FROM JUDICIALWATCH.org
*
“The Obama
Administration seems to be heeding to Mexico’s request by openly halting the
deportation of hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants. Additionally, the
administration has a “backdoor amnesty”
plan to legalize millions of undocumented aliens in case Congress doesn’t pass
legislation to do it.”
*
MEXICO ASKS U.S. TO STOP DEPORTING SERIOUS CRIMINAL… GUESS
OBAMA’S LA RAZA I.C.E WILL SIMPLY LET THEM GO?!?
*
Mexico
Asks U.S. To Stop Deporting Serious Criminals
Last
Updated: Mon, 09/27/2010 - 11:14am
In
a flabbergasting request, a coalition of Mexican lawmakers has asked the United
States to stop deporting illegal immigrants who have been convicted of serious
crimes in American courts.
The
preposterous demand was made at a recent southern California conference in
which the mayors of four Mexican cities that border the U.S. gathered to
discuss cross-border issues. The only American mayor who attended the biannual
event was San Diego’s Jerry Sanders, evidently because his city hosted it this
year at a fancy downtown hotel.
Among
the cross-border topics that were addressed at the conference was the
deportation of Mexican citizens who have committed violent crimes in the U.S.
The felons are persona non grata in their communities, say the mayors of
Tijuana, Ciudad Juarez, Nogales and Nuevo Laredo. They want U.S. officials to
stem the deportation of such convicts to their cities, according to a local newspaper
report that
covered the conference.
To
support the request, the mayor (Jose Reyes Ferriz) of Mexico’s most violent
city, Ciudad Juarez, pointed out that of 80,000 people deported to his
community in the past three years nearly 30,000 had committed serious crimes in
the U.S. Around 7,000 had served sentences for rape and 2,000 for murder. The
criminal deportees have contributed to the escalating drug-cartel violence in
his city, Mayor Ferriz said, so he wants the U.S. to make other arrangements
when prison sentences are completed.
If
this seems unbelievable, consider that a few years ago Mexico’s government
formally complained that too many
Mexicans had been repatriated from the U.S. and that the entire country was overwhelmed
with demands for housing, jobs and schools. Various Mexican legislators
publicly chastised the U.S. for sending illegal immigrants back, explaining
that the country could not accommodate the “repatriated.”
The Obama Administration
seems to be heeding to Mexico’s request by openly halting the deportation of
hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants. Additionally, the administration
has a “backdoor amnesty” plan to
legalize millions of undocumented aliens in case Congress doesn’t pass
legislation to do it.
No comments:
Post a Comment