July 29, 2012
Axelrod: It’s
Amazing ‘We’re Not Getting Blown Away’
David Axelrod’s anxiety
over Barak Obama’s reelection chances is now on full display. In the latest
personal e-mail from the Obama campaign, Axelrod starts to act paranoid:
You know what's kind of
amazing?
That we're not getting
blown away in the face of unprecedented, unlimited spending from super PACs,
Mitt Romney, and all the other shadowy groups trashing Barack Obama nonstop.
Shadowy groups? Is he
hallucinating? Perhaps his boss has reinstituted the Choom Gang and Axelrod has
been puffing away – the donors to Romney’s campaign and pro-Romney Super PACs
has received consistent and brutal scrutiny.
It’s worth noting the
violent language here. For a campaign that whines about incivility on a regular
basis to use the phrase “blown away” is inconsistent, to say the least.
Axelrod continues:
In June, nearly 80
percent of the money Romney and the Republicans raised came from just 6 percent
of the donations they received -- and that's before we count the super PACs.
The other side relies on fewer people giving more, and with this year's new
rules, it's a lot more.
Even with all that, we're
still in a position of strength heading into the final three months of this
race, thanks to grassroots supporters like you. When I talk to a reporter or go
on TV, I'm damn proud to tell people that.
Obama is still in a
position of strength? Oh, like NBC’s polls, which skew the results? Note also
the desperation in tone once again – the cursing has become a hallmark of
Obama’s campaign emails. Axelrod continues:
The story we're telling
is simple: We are a force to be reckoned with, one small donation at a time.
We're facing our next big
fundraising deadline this Tuesday.
Another deadline? Just
how many times can you cry wolf?
When Barack Obama ran for
president in 2008, our campaign changed the way people get involved in
elections.
Undoubtedly true. Just
ask Hillary about the Iowa caucuses of 2008.
He fundamentally believes
that asking everyone to chip in whatever they can, and asking people to get
personally involved -- to go and talk with their neighbors and friends about
why they're a part of it -- is the right way to do this.
Again, Axelrod has a
point. Obama is asking everyone to chip in … and chip in … and chip in. Of
course, there’s not much left at this point.
Today, in the age of
super PACs and outside groups that can spend millions in anonymous money on
misleading attack ads, proving the viability of that kind of politics is even
more important.
Misleading attack ads?
Like the one from your campaign that accused Mitt Romney of being unpatriotic
for once working at Bain? Or the one that accused Romney of lying about Obama’s
words – and which showed Obama actually saying the words?
I love talking about the
way we've built this campaign. Just take a look at last month: more than
700,000 donors in June -- nearly 200,000 of whom had never donated before --
giving an average of over $50 each.
Now here’s a conundrum;
if the Obama campaign has had thousands of supporters giving the requested
minimum of $3, just what are the other supporters giving to raise that average
to $50?
What we have in the bank
at midnight on Tuesday will tell us how big we can go in these critical, final
three months. As of tomorrow, there are 100 days left to make it happen.
If we keep up the
momentum, I know we can make history again.
You just keep on doing
what you do:
Thank you for being part
of this,
David
Read more: http://nation.foxnews.com/david-axelrod/2012/07/29/axelrod-it-s-amazing-we-re-not-getting-blown-away?cmpid=NL_FiredUpFoxNation#ixzz228NKontS
Read more: http://nation.foxnews.com/david-axelrod/2012/07/29/axelrod-it-s-amazing-we-re-not-getting-blown-away?cmpid=NL_FiredUpFoxNation#ixzz228NKontS
*
WHY
OBAMA WILL LOSE… unless enough illegals that he’s handed our jobs to vote for
his expanded version of LA RAZA SUPREMACY!
THERE
IS A REASON WHY OBAMA’S SEC. OF (illegal) LABOR IS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA
SOLIS….
THERE
IS A REASON WHY OBAMA HAS SABOTAGED E-VERIFY… IT’S ALL ABOUT BUYING ILLEGALS’
VOTES WITH OUR JOBS!
KEEPING
WAGES DEPRESSED WITH HORDES OF ILLEGALS PRIMARILY HARMS BLACK AMERICA!
OBAMA
IS NOT AMERICA’S FIRST BLACK PRESIDENT, HE IS LA RAZA’S FIRST HISPANDERER!
July 5, 2012
Why Obama Will Lose in a Landslide
By Wayne Allyn Root
5/30/2012
Most political predictions are made by biased pollsters,
pundits, or prognosticators who are either rooting for Republicans or
Democrats. I am neither. I am a former Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee,
and a well-known Vegas oddsmaker with one of the most accurate records of
predicting political races.
Neither Obama nor Romney are my horses in the race. I
believe both Republicans and Democrats have destroyed the U.S. economy and
brought us to the edge of economic disaster. My vote will go to Libertarian Presidential
candidate Gary Johnson in November, whom I believe has the most fiscally
conservative track record of any Governor in modern U.S. political history.
Without the bold spending cuts of a Gary Johnson or Ron Paul, I don’t believe
it’s possible to turnaround America.
But as an oddsmaker with a pretty remarkable track record of
picking political races, I play no favorites. I simply use common sense to call
them as I see them. Back in late December I released my New Years Predictions.
I predicted back then- before a single GOP primary had been held, with Romney
trailing for months to almost every GOP competitor from Rick Perry to Herman
Cain to Newt- that Romney would easily rout his competition to win the GOP
nomination by a landslide. I also predicted that the Presidential race between
Obama and Romney would be very close until election day. But that on election
day Romney would win by a landslide similar to Reagan-Carter in 1980.
Understanding history, today I am even more convinced of a
resounding Romney victory. 32 years ago at this moment in time, Reagan was
losing by 9 points to Carter. Romney is right now running even in polls. So why
do most pollsters give Obama the edge?
First, most pollsters are missing one ingredient- common
sense. Here is my gut instinct. Not one American who voted for McCain 4 years
ago will switch to Obama. Not one in all the land. But many millions of people
who voted for an unknown Obama 4 years ago are angry, disillusioned, turned
off, or scared about the future. Voters know Obama now- and that is a bad
harbinger.
Now to an analysis of the voting blocks that matter in U.S.
politics:
*Black voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. His
endorsement of gay marriage has alienated many black church-going Christians.
He may get 88% of their vote instead of the 96% he got in 2008. This is not
good news for Obama.
*Hispanic voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. If Romney picks Rubio as his VP running-mate the GOP may pick up an extra 10% to 15% of Hispanic voters (plus lock down Florida). This is not good news for Obama.
*Hispanic voters. Obama has nowhere to go but down among this group. If Romney picks Rubio as his VP running-mate the GOP may pick up an extra 10% to 15% of Hispanic voters (plus lock down Florida). This is not good news for Obama.
*Jewish voters. Obama has been weak in his support of Israel. Many Jewish
voters and big donors are angry and disappointed. I predict Obama's Jewish
support drops from 78% in 2008 to the low 60’s. This is not good news for
Obama.
*Youth voters. Obama’s biggest and most enthusiastic believers from 4
years ago have graduated into a job market from hell. Young people are
disillusioned, frightened, and broke- a bad combination. The enthusiasm is long
gone. Turnout will be much lower among young voters, as will actual voting
percentages. This not good news for Obama.
*Catholic voters. Obama won a majority of Catholics in 2008. That won’t
happen again. Out of desperation to please women, Obama went to war with the
Catholic Church over contraception. Now he is being sued by the Catholic
Church. Majority lost. This is not good news for Obama.*Small Business owners. Because I ran for Vice President last time around, and I'm a small businessman myself, I know literally thousands of small business owners. At least 40% of them in my circle of friends, fans and supporters voted for Obama 4 years ago to “give someone different a chance.” I warned them that he would pursue a war on capitalism and demonize anyone who owned a business...that he’d support unions over the private sector in a big way...that he'd overwhelm the economy with spending and debt. My friends didn’t listen. Four years later, I can't find one person in my circle of small business owner friends voting for Obama. Not one. This is not good news for Obama.
*Blue collar working class whites. Do I need to say a thing? White
working class voters are about as happy with Obama as Boston Red Sox fans feel
about the New York Yankees. This is not good news for Obama.
*Suburban moms. The issue isn’t contraception…it’s having a job to pay for
contraception. Obama’s economy frightens these moms. They are worried about
putting food on the table. They fear for their children’s future. This is not
good news for Obama.
*Military Veterans. McCain won this group by 10 points. Romney is winning by 24
points. The more our military vets got to see of Obama, the more they disliked
him. This is not good news for Obama.
Add it up. Is there one major group where Obama has gained
since 2008? Will anyone in America wake up on election day saying “I didn’t
vote for Obama 4 years ago. But he’s done such a fantastic job, I can’t wait to
vote for him today.” Does anyone feel that a vote for Obama makes their job
more secure?
Forget the polls. My gut instincts as a Vegas oddsmaker and
common sense small businessman tell me this will be a historic landslide and a
world-class repudiation of Obama’s radical and risky socialist agenda. It's
Reagan-Carter all over again.
But I’ll give Obama credit for one thing- he is living proof
that familiarity breeds contempt.
Wayne Allyn Root
Wayne Allyn Root (W.A.R) is a former
Presidential candidate, the 2008 Libertarian Vice Presidential nominee, and a
Tea Party favorite.
*
CAN OBAMA BUY THE ILLEGALS’ VOTES WITH DREAM ACTS WELFARE?
Obama DREAM Amnesty to Cost At Least $585 Million
The Obama Administration's plan to grant deferred action status and work authorization to illegal aliens meeting criteria similar to the DREAM Act could cost over $585 million, internal Department of Homeland Security (DHS) documents reveal. (Arizona Central, July 24, 2012)
The documents, leaked to the Associated Press last
week, provide the first look at the Administration's cost projections for the
amnesty program announced June 15. They include estimates that the federal
government will need to hire over 1,400 new employees and contractors to
process the more than one million anticipated applications. (Id.) In
fact, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) — the agency that the
Inspector General discovered earlier this year was pressuring its employees
into rubber-stamping immigration benefits applications despite questions of
fraud or ineligibility — estimates the amnesty will result in it processing
more than 3,000 applications daily. (Id.; see also FAIR Legislative Update, Jan. 9, 2012 and OIG Report 12-24)
The documents also undermine the Administration's claims that
the amnesty will be fee-driven and not cost U.S. taxpayers. While the internal documents
show DHS is considering charging illegal aliens $465 per application, the
documents also state that depending on how many applicants are granted a waiver
or otherwise do not pay, the government could lose between $19 million and $121
million. (Arizona Central, July 24, 2012)Secretary Napolitano told
Congress last week that DHS would release its plans for implementing the application
process August 1 and that it would begin accepting applications August 15. (See
Bloomberg Government Transcript, July 19, 2012; see also FAIR Legislative Update, July 23) The Department
was scheduled to hold its second stakeholder conference call on the recently
announced deferred action program July 26 (already rescheduled from July 9),
but cancelled the call just hours before it was to occur.
*
“We should not
forget that we are a nation of laws and a nation of immigrants,” Napolitano
said.
*
The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts
by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully
belong to citizens and legal workers.
Illegal Alien Parents to Benefit from President's DREAM Act Decree
Lost in the media frenzy surrounding President Obama's decision to
administratively implement the DREAM Act is the Administration's plans to also
grant a reprieve to the illegal alien parents who brought them here in
violation of U.S. immigration law. In doing so, the Administration is
directly contradicting its own public relations campaign — and that of amnesty
advocates nationwide — which has portrayed its new policy as a way to provide
"a degree of relief" to "innocent young kids." (See White
House transcript, June 15, 2012; to
read more about the President's "deferred action" policy, see FAIR's Legislative
Update, June 19, 2012)
The Administration's decision to
not deport the illegal alien parents of so-called DREAMers was revealed by
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano during a CNN interview. Here is
the exchange between CNN Anchorman Wolf Blitzer and Secretary Napolitano:
BLITZER:
What about the parents of these children? The children come forward now, they
identify themselves. Should the parents be concerned that potentially they
could be deported? They would now be identified as illegal immigrants.
NAPOLITANO:
No. We are not going to do that. We have internally set it up so that the
parents are not referred for immigration enforcement if the young person comes
in for deferred action. However, the parents are not qualified for deferred
action. This is for the young people who meet the criteria that we've set
forth. (CNN transcript, June 15, 2012)
While Napolitano makes the
distinction that the illegal alien parents will not qualify for "deferred
action," the Administration's decision not to deport them essentially
amounts to the same thing. The only major difference is that if the Department
of Homeland Security simply administratively closes the parents' cases, it is
uncertain whether it will grant the parents work authorization.
As if the President's new deferred
action policy were not troubling enough itself, the decision not to deport the
illegal alien parents of DREAMers could triple the number of illegal aliens who
benefit from it. Excluding parents, the Pew Hispanic Center estimates that at
least 1.4 million illegal aliens would qualify for deferred action under the
President's new program. (See Pew Hispanic Center report, June 15, 2012) But
with the Administration's acknowledgment that it will no longer deport the
illegal alien parents of DREAMers, the size of the President's amnesty program
could triple, or perhaps even quadruple, when fraudulent applications are taken
into account.
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the
jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas,
co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on
the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should
support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they
need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."
*
Newsmax
Obama's 'Hispanicazation' of America
Monday,
January 10, 2011 08:28 AM
The truth about the DREAM Act
Published
March 20, 2012
The
DREAM Act has become a rallying cry for President Obama, members of his administration, and liberal
Democrats everywhere. President Obama has vowed to “keep fighting for the DREAM
Act,” which would grant amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants.
It’s
true when listeners or those polled don’t know the facts that the DREAM Act has
some appeal. After all, we are all naturally sympathetic when children are
involved. *
THE MEXICAN CRIME
TIDAL WAVE SPREADS ACROSS THE UNITED STATES
Everyday there are 12 Americans murdered by Mexicans and 8
children molested!
California Attorney Gen Kamala Harris announced that nearly
HALF of all murders in Mex-occupied CA are by MEX GANGS!
*
WILL MEXICO BANKRUPT
AMERICA?
CALIFORNIA UNDER
MEXICAN-OCCUPATION PAYS OUT $22 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO
ILLEGALS!
*
WILL OHIO BE
BANKRUPTED BY THE LA RAZA MEX-OCCUPATION THAT NOT ONE LEGAL VOTED FOR?
*
HOW MANY BILLIONS ARE
MARYLANDERS FORCED TO PAY FOR MEX WELFARE AND LOOTING?
*
BARACK OBAMA, FIRST
HISPANDERING LA RAZA “THE RACE” PRESIDENT – HIS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST INFESTED
ADMINISTRATION:
*
OBAMA AND MEXICO
PROMISE ILLEGALS JUMPING OUR BORDERS OBAMACARE, “FREE” MEDICAL, “FREE” ANCHOR
BABY BIRTHING = 18 YEARS WELFARE, AND OUR JOBS!
*
ROBERT RECTOR: THE
STAGGERING COST OF MEXICO’S INVASION, OCCUPATION AND EVER GROWING WELFARE STATE
*
ONE OF MEXICO’S
BIGGEST EXPORTS NEXT TO DRUGS, AND CRIMINALS ARE PREGNANT WOMEN. THESE POOR
DESPERATE WOMEN JUMP OUR BORDERS FOR “FREE” ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING = 18 YEARS OF
WELFARE FOR EACH CHILD.
THE CHILDREN BORN OF
MEXICANS THAT ILLEGALLY CROSSED OUR BORDERS IS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN BUT STILL A
CITIZEN OF MEXICO.
*
THE LOOTING OF
AMERICA BY MEXICO, BARACK OBAMA and ERIC HOLDER
OBAMA’S
HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA:
*
ANCHOR BABIES – HOW
MEXICO ANCHORS THEIR OCCUPATION AND EXPAND THEIR WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS!
*
FIFTEEN THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT LA RAZA “THE RACE”
by Michelle Malkin
Only in America could critics of a group called
"The Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing identity
chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have succeeded in
redefining all opposition as "hate."
Both Barack Obama and John McCain will speak this
week in San Diego at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza,
the Latino organization whose name is Spanish for, yes, "The Race."
Can you imagine Obama and McCain paying homage to a group of white people who
called themselves that? No matter. The presidential candidates and the media
have legitimized "The Race" as a mainstream ethnic lobbying group and
marginalized its critics as intolerant bigots. The unvarnished truth is that
the group is a radical ethnic nationalist outfit that abuses your tax dollars
and milks PC politics to undermine our sovereignty.
*
Here are 15 things you should know about "The Race":
15. "The Race" supports driver's licenses for illegal aliens.
*
14."The Race" demands in-state tuition
discounts for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding U.S.
citizens and law-abiding legal immigrants.
*
13. "The Race" vehemently opposes
cooperative immigration enforcement efforts between local, state and federal
authorities.
*
12. "The Race" opposes a secure fence on the southern border.
*
11. "The Race" joined the American-Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee in a failed lawsuit attempt to prevent the feds
from entering immigration information into a key national crime database -- and
to prevent local police officers from accessing the data.
*
10. "The Race" opposed the state of
Oklahoma's tough immigration-enforcement-first laws, which cut off welfare to
illegal aliens, put teeth in employer sanctions and strengthened local-federal
cooperation and information sharing.
*
9. "The Race" joined other open-borders,
anti-assimilationists and sued to prevent Proposition 227, California's
bilingual education reform ballot initiative, from becoming law.
*
8. "The Race" bitterly protested common-sense voter ID provisions as an "absolute disgrace."
*
7. "The Race" has consistently opposed post-9/11 national security measures at every turn.
*
6. Former "Race" president Raul
Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton's Hispanic outreach adviser, said this: "U.S.
English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks." He was
referring to U.S. English, the nation's oldest, largest citizens' action group
dedicated to preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United
States. "The Race" also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and
advised the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while
avoiding the terms "illegal" and "amnesty."
*
5. "The Race" gives mainstream cover to a
poisonous subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil
Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA). The late GOP
Rep. Charlie Norwood rightly characterized the organization as "a radical
racist group … one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has
permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a
racist nation out of the American West."
*
4. "The Race" is currently leading a
smear campaign against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called
for TV and cable news networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off
the airwaves -- in addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut
up their foes. The New York Times reported that current "Race"
president Janet Murguia believes "hate speech" should "not be
tolerated, even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment
rights."
*
3. "The Race" sponsors militant ethnic
nationalist charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars (at least $8
million in federal education grants). The schools include Aztlan Academy in
Tucson, Ariz., the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, Ariz., Academia Cesar Chavez
Charter School in St. Paul, Minn., and La Academia Semillas del Pueblo in Los
Angeles, whose principal inveighed: "We don't want to drink from a White
water fountain, we have our own wells and our natural reservoirs and our way of
collecting rain in our aqueducts. We don't need a White water fountain …
ultimately the White way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of
life will eventually lead to our own destruction."
*
2. "The Race" has perfected the art of
the PC shakedown at taxpayer expense, pushing relentlessly to lower home loan
standards for Hispanic borrowers, reaping millions in federal "mortgage
counseling" grants, seeking special multimillion-dollar earmarks and
partnering with banks that do business with illegal aliens.
*
1. "The Race" thrives on ethnic supremacy
-- and the elite sheeple's unwillingness to call it what it is. As historian
Victor Davis Hanson observes: "[The] organization's very nomenclature 'The
National Council of La Raza' is hate speech to the core. Despite all the
contortions of the group, Raza (as its Latin cognate suggests) reflects the
meaning of 'race' in Spanish, not 'the people'-- and that's precisely why we
don't hear of something like 'The National Council of the People,' which would
not confer the buzz notion of ethnic, racial and tribal chauvinism."
The fringe is the center. The center is the fringe. Viva La Raza?
No comments:
Post a Comment