Richard C. Blum and Dianne
Feinstein: The Power Couple of California
From FoundSF
Historical Essay
by Laurence H. Shoup
Senator Dianne
Feinstein with her husband Richard Blum at a Democratic election party in San
Francisco, November 7, 2006.
On January 20, 1980, in San Francisco, California, finance capitalist Richard C. Blum (born in 1936) and the ambitious Democratic Party politician Dianne Feinstein (born 1933) were married in a wedding ceremony at San Francisco City Hall. This marriage created a family economic and political alliance that in a little over a decade would allow them to become the top power couple in the state of California with a place on the national and world stages. They remain at the pinnacle of power today, he as a billionaire financier, speculator, real estate executive and deal maker; she as the senior Senator (California’s highest federal official), from the largest and most powerful state in the United States. They exemplify power as it is now wielded in the higher circles of the class system of the U.S. today, and illustrate well the dismal results of this system. This system is best characterized as a plutocratic kleptocracy, completely lacking in authentic democracy, operated by and for corporate racketeers, in short, a dictatorship of big capital, the top 1% of wealth holders, which makes up a ruling class.
Richard Blum at his swearing in for a city commission
post, January 22, 1996.On January 20, 1980, in San Francisco, California, finance capitalist Richard C. Blum (born in 1936) and the ambitious Democratic Party politician Dianne Feinstein (born 1933) were married in a wedding ceremony at San Francisco City Hall. This marriage created a family economic and political alliance that in a little over a decade would allow them to become the top power couple in the state of California with a place on the national and world stages. They remain at the pinnacle of power today, he as a billionaire financier, speculator, real estate executive and deal maker; she as the senior Senator (California’s highest federal official), from the largest and most powerful state in the United States. They exemplify power as it is now wielded in the higher circles of the class system of the U.S. today, and illustrate well the dismal results of this system. This system is best characterized as a plutocratic kleptocracy, completely lacking in authentic democracy, operated by and for corporate racketeers, in short, a dictatorship of big capital, the top 1% of wealth holders, which makes up a ruling class.
Photo: Rick
Gerharter
Blum is finance capital personified, and Feinstein
precisely illustrates the corrupt, war-mongering, pro-corporate
politicians who inhabit the upper reaches of the U.S. ruling class.
To fully comprehend their rise to power, vast wealth and socio-political
stance, one needs to understand the key developmental trends in the U.S. and
world political economy during Blum-Feinstein’s rise during the last few
decades. Also necessary is a comprehension of how Blum-Feinstein have both
adapted to and helped quicken these developmental trends.
The Financialization of Capital Accumulation
The financial capitalist now plays the leading role in
capitalist development, this type of capitalist has taken over from the
formerly dominant industrial capitalist. This process also has financialized
class and class relations; these are more and more characterized by extreme
differences in wealth and income from the top to the bottom of the class
system. The top 1% of U.S. wealth holders, Blum and Feinstein among them,
currently hold about 35% of the total wealth of the nation (43% of the
financial wealth), and the top 20% have 85% of the total wealth. Conversely,
the bottom 80% of the population owns only 15% of the wealth, the bottom 40% of
the population owns only 0.3% of the nation’s wealth (basically nothing), and
about one in six Americans (almost 50 million people) live in poverty, with no
wealth and lacking even a minimal income.
In the case of Blum-Feinstein, we can see what being in
the top 1% means. They currently own a private jet, a Gulfstream G650, worth
$55 million in 2008. Blum-Feinstein also own an entire 161 room San Francisco
hotel (The Carlton) and at least six other homes. At a low estimate, including
their hotel, their personal real estate holdings, together with their private
jet, are likely worth well over $100 million today.
Blum’s empire begins with his ownership of Blum Capital
Partners, a firm he founded in 1975. In its 2005 edition, one standard industry
source, Pratt’s Guide to Private Equity Sources, lists Blum Capital Partners as
a firm “investing own capital” and having $1.589 billion under management. Two
other, more recent sources, list the assets of Blum Capital at the higher
levels of $2.8 billion and $4.5 billion. Blum’s firm’s clients reportedly
include some of America’s wealthiest people and largest corporations, like oil
heir Gordon Getty and Bank of American. Blum Capital Partners also has a joint
venture with a much larger firm, The Texas Pacific Group (TPG) and Blum Capital
Newbridge Capital to conduct this joint venture. Blum has been a Co-Chairman of
both Newbridge and TPG.
Feinstein and Blum at a Lawrence Livermore Lab event in
2006.
Corporate Neoliberalism
Neoliberalism is a version of extreme free market
thinking, putting forth the pure logic of capital. Neoliberalism’s critique and
actions aim not only at ending the regulatory and welfare states, it wants to
shrink government’s role in economic and political life down to the point where
the wealthy corporate ruling class will totally control economy, society, and
political life with no interference.
Long theorized by right wing thinkers, neoliberalism came
into vogue during the 1980s as a way to open up more economic living space for
capital, “opening new markets.” As these areas are opened up, one result is an
increase in the commodification of various aspects of life. Neoliberalism also
opposes the former Keynesian consensus that fostered aspects of the welfare
state, that is, offering some government benefits to the working class to pump
up effective economic demand. According to neoliberal ideology, government
should be weak and market/commodity relations dominant, so the Keynesian
approach should be scrapped.
Neoliberalism as an ideology is completely hypocritical
however, because virtually all of the government welfare, sweetheart contracts,
tax cuts, subsidies and bailouts given to major corporations continue under
neoliberal governance, only the Keynesian type benefits to workers are really
cut. In actual practice, therefore, it is a philosophy meant to make workers
and their unions pay for the crisis tendencies of capitalism, making the
capitalist crisis actually a working class crisis. Under corporate neoliberal
thinking over the past thirty years, all aspects of the New Deal reforms of the
1930s have been under increasing attack.
Another aspect of neoliberal ideology is the ongoing
attacks on unions, since union organizing and action to protect workers
distorts the operations of the “free” market. Corporations are free to export
jobs and income to low wage nations, but workers are often unjustly prevented
from organizing unions both at home and in repressive nations abroad.
Blum and Feinstein’s policies and actions promote
neoliberalism. Blum’s field of operation is worldwide, exporting jobs overseas
to capture surplus value in areas of the world that are expanding rapidly at a
time when there is stagnation in mature capitalist economies. Blum’s foreign
investments have focused on Asia, including China, Australia, and Korea, often
through the TPG and Newbridge Capital.
Feinstein and Blum are also major investors in two
private educational corporations, the Career Educational Corporation, and ITT
Educational Services. At the same time, Blum donated heavily to the political
campaigns of California Governor Gray Davis, amounting to at least $75,000 in a
two-year period beginning about 2000. As a result, Davis, following his “pay to
play” politics, appointed Blum to be a member of the University of California
Board of Regents. Within a few years, Blum became the Chairman of this Board
while it raised tuition for the University’s students again and again,
increases that amounted to 32% in only one year. Students have had to take out
massive loans to attend school. One source indicates that the amount of debt
loaded on all U.S. students has jumped from $90 billion in 1999 to $550 billion
in 2011. As students were priced out of an increasingly expensive public
university system, the inferior, privately operated correspondence type diploma
mills where Blum had major investments became increasingly attractive. Not to
be left out of the drive to weaken public education and teachers unions in
order to open space for private capital accumulation, Feinstein had become a
supporter of school vouchers by 2003, undermining public schools by allowing
parents to use public money to pay for tuition at private or parochial schools
in Washington, D.C. (San Francisco Chronicle July 23, 2003:A3).
Senator Dianne Feinstein speaking at the annual gala of
the Human RIghts Campaign, October 22, 2011.
Photo: Rick
Gerharter
A final aspect is cutting taxes on the wealthy, and, of
course, Feinstein consistently favors such cuts. One example is Feinstein’s
support for a phase-out of inheritance taxes on large estates. In July of 2000,
she was one of a small group of Democratic Senators defending and voting for a
Republican sponsored bill to repeal an estate tax law first passed in 1916, a
law that applied to only the top 2% of taxable estates.
Imperialism, Militarism and War
The imperialist
policies to be followed by the U.S. and NATO are discussed and
developed by think tanks and policy forming organizations the leading U.S. private,
(closely connected to official circles), such as the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR), and the Brookings Institute. A similar organization, only
international in membership is the Trilateral Commission, which draws its
members from many countries in Europe, North America and Asia. Blum-Feinstein
are closely connected with all three of these private foreign planning
organizations and their imperialist policies. Both Blum and Feinstein have been
members of the CFR for a number of years (membership is by invitation only).
Blum has been a trustee of and part of the power structure of the Brookings
Institute for years (Brookings regularly hosts the “Brookings-Blum Roundtable”
discussion series) and Feinstein currently serves on the North American branch
of the Trilateral Commission, after having first become involved with this
organization in 1988. One result of these close connections is the fact that
Feinstein is an enthusiastic war hawk and strongly supports all the current
wars and occupations of U.S. imperialism, from Iraq and Afghanistan to Libya.
Feinstein also chairs the Senate Intelligence Committee.
She approved of the appointment of General David Petraeus to head the CIA,
saying that she had “enormous respect” for him, and that the U.S. should “…put
all of our eggs in the Petraeus basket…” This illustrates that Feinstein has
embraced the dangerous and illegal new method of warfare now being waged by the
CIA under Petraeus. This new way of war is to send robotic machines (drones)
over borders to kill thousands of people, even American citizens who are viewed
as enemies.
Managed “Democracy”: A Corporate Dominated Political
System
In recent decades the level of corporate domination of
American politics has clearly increased. The pathways to intensified corporate
control have been through the candidate selection process, campaign finance,
massive lobbying, favorable media coverage to corporate ruling class linked
candidates, expert advisers from ruling class think tanks and vote rigging
through exclusion of people and through computers. Corporations claiming to be
human beings can now purchase unlimited “free speech”, while real citizens are
often denied such rights by their relative poverty, lack of access to media, or
by police repression. Collectively, this has resulted in making the U.S.
political system mostly a managed “democracy.”
Blum and Feinstein are key players in what can best be
called the San Francisco Democratic Party political machine. Feinstein
conducted Jerry Brown’s wedding (to a former Vice President of the Gap) where
the entire Bay Area political machine was present, and hosted a wedding shower
for Gavin Newsom at
her Pacific Heights mansion, illustrating her close personal, economic and
political ties to key members of this group. The group obviously also has
important national level connections as well, former Vice President Al Gore is
a long time friend and business partner of Blum.
While pretending to represent the interests of the rank
and file, once in office, Feinstein and other corporate ruling class supported
politicians payoff their partners with policies favorable to their interests,
including government contracts. Again Blum and Feinstein are prime examples of
how this corrupt system really works. Senator Feinstein, who was already in
October of 1994 called “… the most prolific fund-raiser among all federal
candidates” by the Los Angeles Times (October 28, 1994: A1), has
received large campaign donations (in the thousands from each one) from a truly
amazing list of top California and national level corporations.
The daughter of a wealthy doctor, educated at elite
private schools, including Stanford University, Feinstein spent her way to
political power, breaking records for campaign fundraising and spending
beginning with her early campaigns for the San Francisco Board of Supervisors.
Serving the wealthy, first and foremost herself and her husband, has marked her
career. As the Los Angeles Times (October 28, 1994: A24) expressed it
after observing only her actions for only a short time in office:
“A review of the
senator’s first two years in office found that Feinstein supported several
positions that benefited Blum, his wealthy clients and their investments. She
was a vocal proponent of increased trade with China while Blum’s firm was
planning a major investment there. She also voted for appropriations bills that
provided more than $100 million a year in federal funds to three companies in
which her husband is a substantial investor.”
In 2007 investigative reporter Peter Byrne published a
series of reports that showed that her actions in the early 1990s was only the
beginning of Feinstein’s aiding her husband’s firms. As chairperson of the
Senate’s Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee from 2001-2007,
Feinstein supervised and supported the appropriation of over $1.5 billion for
two military contractors, URS Corporation and Perini Corporation, both
companies that Blum had a controlling interest in. Blum later sold URS for a
reported personal profit of $57 million. When Feinstein’s actions were exposed
in early 2007, she abruptly quit her post on this subcommittee.
Blum returns the favor, raising more money for his
politician wife than any other individual. He arranges contributions and loans
to her campaigns in the millions. At least sometimes this got the power couple
into trouble, even with the weak campaign finance laws that exist. In
Feinstein’s failed 1990 Governor campaign for example, the Feinstein campaign
failed to disclose a series of bank loans arranged by Blum that amounted to at
least $2.9 million. Her campaign was fined a total of $190,000 by California’s
state watchdog agency, the largest such cash settlement in state history, for
an “outrageous case of gross negligence” (Los Angeles Times December 22,
1992: A1, A29).
A more recent example of gross negligence and
incompetence in the area of campaign finance on the part of Feinstein and her
staff was exposed when the FBI arrested her campaign treasurer, Kinde Durkee
for stealing funds from a number of campaign accounts that she managed,
including Feinstein’s (S.F. Chronicle September 14, 2011:A9).
As is the case on every other key question involving our
collective future, Feinstein has been and is against the people’s interest in
having a just and free society. In a 2011 editorial, the San Francisco
Chronicle (May 26, 2011:A15) called her “one of the biggest cheerleaders
for renewing…” Bush’s Patriot Act, which allows roving wiretaps, snooping into
personal records and permits the unwarranted surveillance of people without
having to show probable cause. The Chronicle said that Feinstein and
other supporters of renewal were going “too far” and were “erasing bedrock guarantees”
of the Constitution. This action is part of a pattern of spying favored by
Feinstein. In 2007 she voted for immunity for telecommunications companies who
illegally spied on their customers. Some of these, such as ATT, were also heavy
donors to her political campaigns. As Chairperson of the Senate Intelligence
Committee she also recently criticized the CIA for not spying enough on the
Egyptian people, stating that “the CIA should have monitored Facebook more
closely.”
The Ecological Crisis
The ongoing and accelerating global ecological crisis is
deeply rooted in the anti-ecological imperatives of capitalist production and
exchange for profit and accumulation. Corporate capitalism is a system
requiring constant “expand or die” growth, a system whose main measure of
success is how much capital is accumulated. This results not only in human
alienation, it also results in the alienation from and destruction of entire
natural ecosystems, such as forests, rivers, and grasslands.
Blum and Feinstein routinely undercut ecological needs in
favor of the accumulation of wealth and power. One example is Feinstein’s
relationship to wealthy corporate farmer Stewart Resnick, the owner of over one
hundred thousand acres of prime farmland in the San Joaquin Valley. He has
written big check after big check to her political campaigns, as well as hosted
her at least two of his mansions. Over the past few decades he has also given
several million dollars to the Democratic and Republican Parties and their
candidates. Then, when Resnick called Feinstein in 2009 to weigh in on the side
of corporate agribusiness in a drought fueled ecological dispute over water to
big landowners or water for the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta’s ecological
needs, Feinstein jumped in, pushing the agribusiness viewpoint onto two Cabinet
level secretaries and calling for a sweeping review of the science to allow
more water to go to Resnick and other big operators. Due largely to excessive
water diversions, the Delta’s ecology is in serious trouble, with fish
populations in catastrophic decline.
Blum and Feinstein also favor and work for “wilderness,”
she in the Senate sponsoring legislation to set aside public lands as
preserves, and he as a member of the Governing Council of the Wilderness Society.
The nature and politics of Blum’s Wilderness Society can be seen by looking at
its Governing Council and one of its “corporate partners.” The Governing
Council is filled with the super rich like Blum and includes a member of the
Getty oil family, a member of the Roosevelt family, a Rockefeller family
in-law, a Texas Pacific Group private equity billionaire, an adviser to
Clinton-Gore White House and a past chairman of Recreational Equipment Company,
which sells products for outdoor activities. Its leading corporate partner is
Bank of America, which, for years financed mountain top removal to mine coal by
Massey Energy and International Coal Group. Under the pressure of direct action
against it, the Bank of America cut back on but did not end such financing. The
Blum-Feinstein-Wilderness Society approach of creating a few islands of
non-development in a sea of life destroying capitalist ecocide is clearly
inadequate as a strategy of ecological and human survival.
Conclusion: Blum-Feinstein and the Corporate State
The five interrelated waves of our age, and
Blum-Feinstein’s role, illustrate that the Democratic Party and its leaders are
every bit against the people’s interest as the Republican Party. Both favor the
corporate state and capitalist austerity, imperialism, war and capitalist
ecocide. Blum-Feinstein stand solidly for the financialization of accumulation
and the private use of this wealth to benefit a small group of wealthy owners
(the 1%); they stand for neoliberal ideology; for imperialism, militarism and
war; for undemocratic corporate political rule; and for weak and inadequate
measures to confront the ecological crisis.
Historian, author and activist Laurence H. Shoup lives in
Oakland, California. His most recent book is "Rulers and Rebels: A People’s
History of Early California, 1769-1901".
*
*
SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN, AND HER LAP BITCH BARBARA BOXER, HAVE
VOTED FOR ANY AND ALL WARS FOR MUSLIM DICTATORS, WHILE THEY DEMAND THAT OUR OWN
BORDERS BE LEFT OPEN AND UNDEFENDED AGAINST NARCOMEX.
KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT ABOUT MY WAR PROFITEERING WHORE WIFE’S
MANSIONS! HERE’S A BRIBE TO DO SO!
“Since the 2000 election cycle, Blum has contributed over
$75,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Committee, and thousands more to
individual Democrats, including John Kerry, Robert Byrd, Joe Lieberman, Ted
Kennedy, and Barbara Boxer.”
March 1,
2006 The Democrats' Daddy Warbucks
Feinstein
family war profits, part II
Sen. Dianne Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum,
could well be called the Democrats' Daddy Warbucks. He's scored bundles from
war contracts. He has recently purchased a $16.5 million crib in San Francisco
and along with his wife has handed hundreds of thousands of dollars over to
fellow Democrats. Since the 2000 election cycle, Blum has contributed
over $75,000 to the Democratic Senatorial Committee, and thousands more to
individual Democrats, including John Kerry, Robert Byrd, Joe Lieberman, Ted
Kennedy, and Barbara Boxer. Richard Blum's history as an entrepreneur began at
the ripe age of 23 when he began to work for the San Francisco brokerage firm
Sutro & Company. Blum quickly climbed the ranks and became a partner by the
age of 30. According the San Francisco Chronicle, "Blum proved that he had
an eye for fixer-upper properties when he led a partnership that acquired the
struggling Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Circus for $8 million – then
sold it to Mattel Inc. four years later for $40 million." In 1975, Blum
went out on his own and formed a brokerage agency. Today, Blum's lofty firm,
Blum Capital, holds positions in more than 20 companies, including real estate
giants, credit bureaus, and yes, even military contractors. Blum sees himself
as an altruistic capitalist, claims one of his ex-employees: "He likes to
go after companies that are down and out, and bring their stock back to life.
He thinks he's doing good." Blum shares a large stake in Perini, a civil
construction company that is happily employed in Iraq and Afghanistan. But not
all of Blum's war profits come from Perini. In 1975, his venture capital firm
went after fledging construction and design company URS when the business was
about to be bought out by another corporation. Since then, Blum has increased
his stock in URS, capitalizing on its recent military contracts. Unlike Blum's
dabbling with Barnum & Bailey, his current profits aren't so safe for child
consumption. Here are the basics to date: Blum currently holds over 111,000
shares of stock in URS Corporation, which is now one of the top defense
contractors in the United States. Blum is an acting director of URS, which
bought EG&G, a leading provider of technical services and management to the
U.S. military, from The Carlyle Group in 2002. Carlyle's trusty advisers, past
and present, include former President George H.W. Bush, James Baker, and ex-SEC
Commissioner Arthur Levitt, among other prominent neoconservatives and Washington
power brokers. URS and Blum have since banked on the Iraq war, scoring a phat
$600 million contract through EG&G. As a result, URS has seen its stock
price more than triple since the war began in March 2003. Blum has cashed in
over $2 million on this venture alone and another $100 million for his
investment firm. "As part of EG&G's sale price," reports the San
Francisco Chronicle, "Carlyle acquired a 21.74 percent stake in URS –
second only to the 23.7 percent of shares controlled by Blum Capital." The
Carlyle Group has long been accused of exploiting its political connections to
turn a profit. And if Carlyle can come under the microscope for its government
ties and war profiteering, as it did in Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11, than
surely Blum's URS ought to be subject to the same scrutiny. Owen Blicksilver,
Blum's spokesman, claims his boss and Sen. Feinstein have never talked shop at
home in their gated mansion: "Mr. Blum and Sen. Feinstein have never had
any discussions about outsourcing, government contracts, or URS." If this
were a Republican senator's spouse scoring bundles off the spoils of war and
passing it along to fellow Republicans, the liberals would be up in arms. But
since Dianne Feinstein is a leading Democrat, mum's the word. Partisanship
trumps ethics. The Byrne Report Hawk Tale By Peter Byrne ON JAN. 18, California
senator Dianne Feinstein introduced Dr. Condoleezza Rice at a Senate nomination
hearing for Secretary of State in terms so saccharine that molasses seemed to
ooze out of her mouth. She was a precocious child, Feinstein purred. She has
skill, judgment and poise. She loves football. Bush loves her. "The
problems we face abroad are complex and sizable. If Dr. Rice's past performance
is any indication, though, we can rest easy." That very same day,
Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum, took advantage of a spike in the price of
his URS Corporation stock. He sold a third of his holdings in the defense
contractor for $57 million, according to filings with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission. With Rice confirmed, the business of death and occupation
looks rosy as hell for Feinstein, who--let's get real--benefits tremendously
from sharing community property with Blum. URS' largest customer is the U.S.
Army, which accounted for 17 percent ($587 million) of its cash revenue in
2004. In 2001, URS enjoyed a mere $169 million in defense contracts. Now, its
war contracts total more than $2 billion. According to its annual report, the
San FranciscoÐbased URS anticipates that profits will rocket up in 2005,
because "operations in the Middle East are expected to generate increased
work related to the development of weapons systems, the training of military
pilots and the maintenance, upgrade and repair of military vehicles." Provided,
of course, that our hawkish leadership remains as poised and lovable as the new
Secretary of State. Feinstein, who sits on the Defense Appropriations
Subcommittee, is an advocate of first-strike warfare, even though it flouts
international law and the standards of common decency. Interestingly, her
Financial Disclosure Report for 2003 was more than three times the size of her
2002 disclosure (Feinstein's 2003 disclosure numbers 133 pages, compared to
Sen. Barbara Boxer's six-page report). The Feinstein-Blum portfolio is crammed
with multimillion dollar investments in the military-industrial-financial
complex and corporations that heavily exploit Third World peoples. The senator
has a lot to lose should the neoconservative war machine falter. Hubby holds a
controlling interest in another engineering firm, Perini Corporation of
Framingham, Mass. Perini ranks No. 6 by dollar amount in war-related government
contracts in the Middle East. According to its annual report, "Perini
proudly supports the U.S. government with global rapid response capabilities
for defense, reconstruction and security." Perini builds military
facilities and roads in Afghanistan, electrical infrastructure in Iraq and U.S.
embassies around the world. After the Senate, Feinstein included, approved
Bush's war plans in 2002, Perini's defense contract awards soared from
negligible to $2.52 billion. But, as with many of the sole-source, open-ended
contracts awarded to politically connected firms, there are problems with
accountability. Last summer, Department of Defense auditors determined that
Perini could not adequately justify its costs in Iraq as fair and reasonable.
That's government-speak for: They're gouging the #!$% out of us. Perini is
heavily engaged in military and municipal public works projects inside the
United States; at least two are also under investigation for contract fraud.
For example, the city of San Francisco has sued general contractor
Perini--which was in a joint venture with the Tutor-Saliba construction
firm--for $100 million in cost overruns at a San Francisco International
Airport project. The lawsuit alleges that the joint venture engaged in "a
sophisticated pattern of fraud," including inflating costs, fabricating
delays and setting up minority front companies to exploit affirmative-action
preferences. The attorney general of Massachusetts is looking into alleged
false claims made by a Perini joint venture in the "Big Dig" urban
highway construction boondoggle in Boston. Ron Tutor, owner of Tutor-Saliba and
CEO of Perini, bought into the latter company, along with Blum, as it teetered
on the edge of solvency in the mid- 1990s due to a bad real estate investment.
It rebounded, thanks to the firm's sudden ability to obtain lucrative U.S.
military and government contracts, which, of course, had nothing to do with the
fact that Blum's powerful wife has her hands on the military's purse strings.
Remarkably, Perini grossed $1.37 billion in 2003, up 27 percent from the
previous year, before the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq. Perini
attributes its rocketing profits to "increased volume of work in Iraq and
Afghanistan." As a risk factor, the firm notes that continued demand for
its military services depends upon "the political situation in Iraq,"
which, logically, means that it desires the bloody war and useless occupation
to continue indefinitely--a wish that hawktails with the foreign policy
positions of Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld and Feinstein. I almost forgot: Perini Corp.
is the nation's most active builder of Indian-fronted casinos. That explains a
few things about Sen. Feinstein and the politics of gambling, soon to be
revealed in greater detail in this space.
No comments:
Post a Comment