FROM HIS FIRST DAYS IN OFFICE,
OBAMA HAS HISPANDERED TO BUILD HIS PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS. HE FUNDS LA RAZA
SUPREMACY WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS, AND HAS LA RAZA OPERATING OUT OF THE WHITE
HOUSE UNDER CECILIA MUNOZ.
WHILE OBAMA HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS
PROTECTING THE BORDERS OF MUSLIM
DICTATORS, HE HAS LEFT OUR BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX OPEN AND UNDEFENDED.
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border.
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border.
*
NEW YORK TIMES – MEX
OWNED MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA PROPAGANDA
September 7, 2012
Record Number of Foreigners Were Deported
in 2011, Officials Say
Immigration enforcement authorities detained and deported
record numbers of illegal immigrants in 2011 and are on track for similar
figures this year, even as the numbers of migrants crossing the border
illegally dropped to a 40-year low, according to data published Friday by the Department of Homeland Security.
Immigration agents deported 391,953 foreign-born
people during the 2011 fiscal year, the department’s Office of Immigration
Statistics reported. They
included more than 188,000 people who had been convicted of crimes in the
United States — an “all-time high” for such deportations, the report found.
Citizens of four Latin American countries —
Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador — made up 93 percent of all people
deported last year.
With just one month to go in the 2012 fiscal
year, deportations were down slightly, with just over 366,000 people expelled
through Aug. 31. But they include more than 191,000 convicted criminals, more
than last year, according to figures
from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, one of several agencies in the department.
The figures provide a backdrop to the
administration’s political calculations on the thorny issue of immigration as President
Obama heads
into the last stretch before the November elections. Although Homeland Security
Department officials have said they are focusing their efforts on criminals,
the fast pace of deportations in the last two years was felt in many Latino
immigrant communities, and caused growing disillusionment with Mr. Obama.
Pressure from Latino and immigrant groups helped
persuade Mr. Obama to take a
sweeping executive action in June
to suspend deportations temporarily for as many as 1.7 million young illegal
immigrants who came to this country as children. The program, which has been
very popular among Latinos, began to accept
applications on Aug. 15.
Homeland Security Department officials have not yet reported that any
applicants have been approved and their deportations deferred.
In spite of the sharp increases in deportations
of criminals, Mr. Obama’s policies have not won him friends on the other side
of the political divide. Republicans in Congress say the deferred deportations
are a backdoor amnesty, and they accuse the administration of crippling
enforcement by demanding that agents steer away from arresting illegal
immigrants if they are not convicted criminals.
In addition to formal deportations, last year
Homeland Security Department agents expelled about 324,000 foreigners back to
their countries without formal court proceedings, according to the report. Most
were illegal immigrants who agreed to leave voluntarily after they were
detained, rather than be removed by the authorities.
According to the new figures, Immigration and
Customs Enforcement, which is known as ICE, detained about 429,000 immigrants last
year, another record.
Homeland security authorities have increasingly
concentrated their efforts at the border with Mexico, with the majority of
detentions and expulsions coming there. In 2011, the Border Patrol captured
about 335,000 migrants trying to cross illegally, the lowest number since 1971,
and the figures are continuing to drop. High rates of unemployment here and
intensified border enforcement have discouraged many migrants from Mexico and
Central America from attempting illegal crossings, officials said.
The Republican presidential nominee, Mitt
Romney, has said his priority would be tougher border enforcement. He has not
said if he would cancel the deferred deportations program.
*
THE OBAMA IMMIGRATION POLICY:
NEUTER I.C.E., AND PUT AN OPEN BORDERS
ADVOCATE TO HEAD IT.
STOP THE BUILDING OF THE WALL.
TAKE 600 BORDER GUARDS OFF THE BORDER,
THEN PUT 1,200 IN DESK JOBS.
SUE LEGALS IN ARIZONA AS THE MEX DRUG
CARTELS MAKE DOG FOOD OF OUR TERRORIZED BORDERS!
SABOTAGE E-VERIFY.
FILL THE ADMINISTRATION WITH LA RAZA
PARTY MEMBERS, SUCH AS HILDA SOLIS.
HISPANDER FOR THE ILLEGALS’ ILLEGAL
VOTES.
…. There’s nothing new to any of this.
Obama’s “change” merely meant we faced the accelerated verison of BIT BY BIT
AMNESTY under Bush, Hillary, Billary and Bush2.
“BUT REPUBLICAN LAWMAKERS SAID THE OBAMA
ADMINISTRATION WAS MOVING TOWARD A DE FACTO LEGALIZATION PROGRAM BY ALLOWING
SOME ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS TO REMAIN HERE DESPITE THEIR VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW!”
“…and was denounced by several Republicans as evidence that the Obama administration was weakening enforcement and making it easier for illegal immigrants to remain in the country.”
*
HISPANDERING:
“The memo encourages ICE officers and lawyers to use their authority
to dismiss those cases, canceling the deportation proceedings, if they
determine that the immigrants have no criminal records and stand a strong
chance of having their residence applications approved.”
*
Rep. Barletta Seeks Answers
from Attorney General over Backdoor Amnesty
Freshman
Congressman Lou Barletta (R-PA) sent U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder a letter
last Friday demanding answers regarding the Administration's use of
prosecutorial discretion to grant backdoor amnesty to certain illegal aliens up
to the age of thirty. This policy was announced in Secretary Napolitano's
June 15 memorandum ordering Department of Homeland Security personnel to grant
deferred action to illegal aliens meeting criteria similar to that of the
failed DREAM Act.
In his
letter to the Attorney General, Rep. Barletta charged the Administration with
usurping Congressional authority. Noting that Congress had repeatedly rejected
the DREAM Act, Rep. Barletta wrote, "[W]hen similar measures that would
implement these same policies were presented to Congress, Congress rejected
them. The implementation of the new immigration policy that is contrary to the
expressed will of the Congress violates the Constitution."
Rep. Barletta also asked Attorney General Holder whether
he believed Secretary Napolitano's memorandum was constitutional. "As the
most senior lawyer in our country, I would like to know your opinion about the
constitutionality of Secretary Napolitano's actions." Barletta inquired.
Holder's Justice Department has yet to comment on the Administration's use of
prosecutorial discretion to grant deferred action to broad categories of
illegal aliens. Stay tuned to FAIR for more details...
*
CECILIA MUNOZ
IS ONE OF OBAMA’S MANY LA RAZA SUPREMACIST OPERATING OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE. NO
ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORY HAS BEEN SO INFESTED WITH A FOREIGN BASED POLITICAL
PARTY AS OBAMA’S.
THE FASTEST
GROWING POLITICAL PARTY IN AMERICAN IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA –
THE PARTY of ILLEGALS AND MEXICAN SUPREMACY. THEIR GOAL IS OBAMA AMNESTY OR
CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT, NO E-VERIFY, OPEN BORDERS AND DE FACTO CITIZENSHIPS
WITH DRIVERS’ LICENSES!
VIVA LA RAZA!
YOU ARE! OBAMA HAS SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED THE FUNDING TO EXPAND MEXICAN
SUPREMACY IN OUR BORDERS!
On Thursday, Director of
Intergovernmental Affairs Cecilia Muñoz blogged that the Department of Homeland
Security will review its entire deportation caseload - that's 300,000 cases -
to "clear out low priority" cases and "make more room to deport
people who have been convicted of crimes or pose a security risk."
*
FAIRUS.org - get on their
e-news!
President
Obama’s Record of Dismantling Immigration Enforcement
President Obama’s Record of
Dismantling Immigration Enforcement
Foreword
President
Barack Obama came to office in 2009 and pledged that during his first year of
office he would enact amnesty legislation for illegal aliens living in the
United States. That, of course, did not happen — not because of any lack of
ideological commitment on the part of the President, but because of pragmatic
considerations. Only two years earlier, President Obama, then Senator Obama, watched
as President George W. Bush tried to toss the American people into the boiling
cauldron of comprehensive amnesty in 2007. It didn't work. Voters angrily
crashed the Capitol switchboard on the day the Senate was set to vote and as a
result, fourteen Democrats joined thirty-nine Republicans to vote down the
amnesty legislation.1 The President concluded, correctly, that there just
is not an appetite in Congress for another politically bruising fight over
comprehensive amnesty.
Understanding
that Members of Congress ultimately would not ignore the unequivocal objections
of their constituents to amnesty, the Obama Administration opted to adopt a
strategy of dismantling immigration enforcement in order to achieve the same
ends. The Administration hoped that while the American people were
focused on unemployment, crashing real estate values, banking scandals, health
care reform, foreign policy crises, and countless other issues, they would not
notice just what was actually taking place.
This
report details how the Obama Administration has carried out a policy of de
facto amnesty for millions of illegal aliens through executive policy
decisions. Since 2009, the Obama Administration has systematically gutted
effective immigration enforcement policies, moved aggressively against state
and local governments that attempt to enforce immigration laws, and stretched
the concept of "prosecutorial discretion" to a point where it has
rendered many immigration laws meaningless. Remarkably, the Administration has
succeeded in doing all this with barely a peep of protest from Congress.
Thus,
despite the fact that the U.S. Constitution grants Congress plenary authority
over immigration policy, the Executive Branch is now making immigration policy
unconstrained by constitutional checks and balances. This report
chronologically highlights the process that has unfolded over the past three
and half years. A review of the Obama Administration's record shows:
·
The Administration's
conscious effort to end policies that effectively enforce and deter illegal
immigration. This includes the cessation of meaningful worksite enforcement
against employers who hire illegal aliens and the removal of the illegal
workers. It also includes ending effective partnership programs with state and
local governments, such as the 287(g) program, that provide a structure through
which state and local agencies may enforce immigration laws.
·
The Administration's
intimidation of state and local governments determined to enforce federal
immigration laws. President Obama has turned the Department of Justice into the
Administration's attack dog, filing lawsuits against states that pass their own
immigration enforcement laws. When lawsuits fail, the Department's Civil Rights
division launches meritless investigations designed to harass local governments
and officials who attempt to enforce the law.
·
The Administration's
dependence on illegal alien advocates to make U.S. immigration policy for the
Executive Branch. President Obama has placed strident amnesty advocates in key
positions throughout his Administration. These appointees have worked openly
with advocacy groups to shape a series of policies that amount to backdoor
amnesty.
·
Outright deception on the
part of the Administration designed to convince the American public that
immigration laws are being vigorously enforced. The Obama Administration
repeatedly engages in efforts to inflate its record of deporting illegal
aliens. These deceptive practices include the release of data that is later
exposed to be inaccurate. The Departments of Justice and Homeland Security
carefully select data to claim that our "borders are more secure than
ever," even as violence along the southern border escalates to alarming
proportions.
The Obama
Administration's strategy is to count on the fact that the public and the media
will not take notice of each individual and incremental step they are taking to
undermine immigration enforcement and grant de facto amnesty to as many illegal
aliens as possible. This report exposes the strategy and the policy objectives
behind it.
July 2012
Obama's lowest priority: some deportation
cases
Tuesday,
August 23, 2011
President
Obama is in a pickle.
Immigration enforcement actually is working - or, at least, it was working.
Under the
Obama administration, the government has removed almost 400,000 illegal
immigrants annually. That's 4 percent of the 10 million illegal immigrants
estimated to be living in America - and it sends a warning to those thinking of
illegally entering the United States.
Thanks to
the Secure Communities program, which requires local law enforcement to share
arrestees' fingerprints with Washington, about half of those deported have
criminal records. According to the administration, the vast majority of the
rest either re-crossed the border after deportation or were recently caught.
So what
did the White House announce last week? On
Thursday, Director of Intergovernmental Affairs Cecilia Muñoz blogged that the
Department of Homeland Security will review its entire deportation caseload -
that's 300,000 cases - to "clear out low priority" cases and
"make more room to deport people who have been convicted of crimes or pose
a security risk."
Sen. Dick
Durbin, D-Ill., told the New York Times that the policy would protect youths
with clean criminal records whose parents brought them into the country when
they were minors. That is, he likened the Obama policy to his proposed
legislation, the Dream (Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors)
Act.
Actually,
the Obama policy goes much further than shielding minors. Under the guise of
"prosecutorial discretion," a Department of Homeland Security memo
advises officials to consider a number of "positive factors" before
prosecuting offenders. "Positive factors" include military service,
"long-time lawful permanent" residency, "minors and elderly
individuals," nursing, pregnant and disabled.
On the
one hand, the policy seems smart - let the government concentrate on deporting
threats to public safety.
On the
other hand, the White House essentially has announced that individuals who
break federal immigration law are a "low priority" and unlikely to
face legal consequences. So much for deterrence.
Worse,
the new policy will allow individuals who have been caught up in a Secure
Communities' review to apply for work permits. Mark Krikorian, executive
director of the pro-enforcement Center for Immigration Studies, said that the
new policy makes getting arrested equivalent to winning the lottery: "Their
fellow illegal aliens who were not arrested don't get work authorization."
Krikorian
calls the new policy "administrative amnesty." Obama failed to
persuade Congress to change the law. Now with the 2012 presidential election
looming, he changed policies implemented in the Clinton and George W. Bush
years by fiat.
Bush's
Secure Communities program enabled Obama to boast that his administration
delivered the greatest number of illegal immigrant removals ever - 395,165 - in
Fiscal Year 2009. In 2010, the number fell. Last month, he told the National
Council of La Raza, "Here's the only thing you should know. The Democrats
and your president are with you."
Re-election,
after all, is his highest priority.
*
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH
GET ON THEIR E-NEWS!
Obama Starts Suspending Deportations
Last
Updated: Tue, 08/23/2011 - 4:14pm
Keeping its promise to suspend deportations for a broad
class of illegal immigrants, the Obama Administration has officially started
the process that’s expected to spare tens of thousands from removal in the
coming months.
Among the first illegal aliens to benefit from the
president’s backdoor amnesty plan is a Mexican man living in Florida. He got
busted a few years ago after applying for a work permit and was earmarked for
deportation. Earlier this month local media portrayed the man, Manuel Guerra,
as a desperate undocumented
worker
trying to build a new life after fleeing violent street gangs in his native
Mexico.
This week the 27-year-old, who has lived in the U.S.
illegally for more than a decade, became the poster child for Obama’s newly
implemented amnesty program. Federal immigration authorities officially suspended his
deportation,
according a mainstream newspaper report that says Guerra had been caught in a
“tortuous and seemingly failing five-year court fight against deportation.”
Guerra was spared after a working group from the departments
of Homeland Security and Justice met to start reviewing 300,000 deportation
cases pending before immigration courts nationwide. Under Obama’s new plan,
authorities will have wide discretion to
halt deportations
and will be encouraged to do so in cases where illegal immigrants attend
school, have family in the military or are primary bread winners.
The stealth amnesty plan was first introduced last year in
case Congress doesn’t pass legislation to legalize the nation’s 12 million
undocumented immigrants. Earlier this year political appointees at U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), actually issued a directive to
enact “meaningful immigration reform absent legislative action.” The plan
includes delaying deportation indefinitely (“deferred action”), granting green
cards, allowing illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. indefinitely while
they seek legal status (known as “parole in place”) and expanding the
definition of “extreme hardships” so any illegal alien could meet the criteria
and remain in the country.
This goes hand in hand with the president’s new blueprint
for immigration reform, which was recently issued by the White House. Titled “Building A 21st
Century Immigration System,” the plan strives to strengthen the U.S. economy and
“competitiveness” by creating a legal immigration system that reflects the
nation’s “values and diverse needs.” After all, it claims that the
“overwhelming majority” of people living in the U.S. with “no legal status” are
“simply seeking a better life for themselves and their children.”
The president’s new plan, which has already allocated $8
million to community groups that operate immigrant “integrational programs,”
also expands “anti discrimination provisions of immigration law” and provides
more “comprehensive anti-retaliation protections.”
*
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/jun/nclr-funding-skyrockets-after-obama-hires-its-vp
http://www.judicialwatch.org/blog/2011/jun/nclr-funding-skyrockets-after-obama-hires-its-vp
NATIONAL
COUNSEL OF LA RAZA – THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY IN U.S.
NCLR Funding Skyrockets After Obama Hires Its VP
06/17/2011
A Judicial Watch investigation reveals that federal funding for a Mexican La Raza group that for years has raked in millions of taxpayer dollars has skyrocketed since one of its top officials got a job in the Obama White House.
The influential and politically-connected National Council of La Raza (NCLR) has long benefitted from Uncle Sam's largess but the group has made a killing since Obama hired its senior vice president (Cecilia Muñoz) in 2009 to be his director of intergovernmental affairs.
Ignored by the mainstream media, Judicial Watch covered the appointment because the president issued a special "ethics waiver" to bring Muñoz aboard since it violated his own lobbyist ban. At the pro illegal immigration NCLR, Muñoz supervised all legislative and advocacy activities on the state and local levels and she was heavily involved in the congressional immigration battles that took place in the George W. Bush Administration.
She also brought in a steady flow of government cash that's allowed the Washington D.C.-based group to expand nationwide and promote its leftist, open-borders agenda via a network of community organizations dedicated to serving Latinos.Among them are a variety of local groups that provide social services, housing counseling and farm worker assistance as well as publicly-funded charter schools that promote radical Chicano curriculums. Judicial Watch published a special report on this a few years ago.
This week a JW probe has uncovered details of the alarming increase in federal funding that these NCLR groups have received since Muñoz joined the Obama Administration. In fact, the government cash more than doubled the year Muñoz joined the White House, from $4.1 million to $11 million.
Not surprisingly, a big chunk of the money (60%) came from the Department of Labor, which is headed by a former California congresswoman (Hilda Solis) with close ties to the La Raza movement. Since Obama named her Labor Secretary, Solis has launched a nationwide campaign to protect illegal immigrant workers in the U.S. Just this week Solis penned declarations with Guatemala and Nicaragua to preserve the rights of their migrants.
The NCLR also received additional taxpayer dollars from other federal agencies in 2010, the JW probe found. The Department of Housing and Urban Development doled out $2.5 million for housing counseling, the Department of Education contributed nearly $800,000 and the Centers for Disease Control a quarter of a million.
Additionally, NCLR affiliates nationwide raked in tens of millions of government grant and recovery dollars last year thanks to the Muñoz factor. An offshoot called Chicanos Por La Causa (CPLC) saw its federal funding nearly double to $18.3 million following Muñoz' appointment.
A social service and legal assistance organization (Ayuda Inc.) that didn't receive any federal funding between 2005 and 2008 got $600,000 in 2009 and $548,000 in 2010 from the Department of Justice. The group provides immigration law services and guarantees confidentiality to assure illegal aliens that they won't be reported to authorities.
NCLR Funding Skyrockets After Obama Hires Its VP
06/17/2011
A Judicial Watch investigation reveals that federal funding for a Mexican La Raza group that for years has raked in millions of taxpayer dollars has skyrocketed since one of its top officials got a job in the Obama White House.
The influential and politically-connected National Council of La Raza (NCLR) has long benefitted from Uncle Sam's largess but the group has made a killing since Obama hired its senior vice president (Cecilia Muñoz) in 2009 to be his director of intergovernmental affairs.
Ignored by the mainstream media, Judicial Watch covered the appointment because the president issued a special "ethics waiver" to bring Muñoz aboard since it violated his own lobbyist ban. At the pro illegal immigration NCLR, Muñoz supervised all legislative and advocacy activities on the state and local levels and she was heavily involved in the congressional immigration battles that took place in the George W. Bush Administration.
She also brought in a steady flow of government cash that's allowed the Washington D.C.-based group to expand nationwide and promote its leftist, open-borders agenda via a network of community organizations dedicated to serving Latinos.Among them are a variety of local groups that provide social services, housing counseling and farm worker assistance as well as publicly-funded charter schools that promote radical Chicano curriculums. Judicial Watch published a special report on this a few years ago.
This week a JW probe has uncovered details of the alarming increase in federal funding that these NCLR groups have received since Muñoz joined the Obama Administration. In fact, the government cash more than doubled the year Muñoz joined the White House, from $4.1 million to $11 million.
Not surprisingly, a big chunk of the money (60%) came from the Department of Labor, which is headed by a former California congresswoman (Hilda Solis) with close ties to the La Raza movement. Since Obama named her Labor Secretary, Solis has launched a nationwide campaign to protect illegal immigrant workers in the U.S. Just this week Solis penned declarations with Guatemala and Nicaragua to preserve the rights of their migrants.
The NCLR also received additional taxpayer dollars from other federal agencies in 2010, the JW probe found. The Department of Housing and Urban Development doled out $2.5 million for housing counseling, the Department of Education contributed nearly $800,000 and the Centers for Disease Control a quarter of a million.
Additionally, NCLR affiliates nationwide raked in tens of millions of government grant and recovery dollars last year thanks to the Muñoz factor. An offshoot called Chicanos Por La Causa (CPLC) saw its federal funding nearly double to $18.3 million following Muñoz' appointment.
A social service and legal assistance organization (Ayuda Inc.) that didn't receive any federal funding between 2005 and 2008 got $600,000 in 2009 and $548,000 in 2010 from the Department of Justice. The group provides immigration law services and guarantees confidentiality to assure illegal aliens that they won't be reported to authorities.
*
SHOCKING FACTS ON OBAMA’S FUNDING OF
THE MEXICAN SUPREMACIST MOVEMENT OF LA RAZA
*
*
*
*
OBAMA’S I.C.E. IS ONE MORE AGENCY TO EXPAND HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS!
ICE IS OBAMA’S AGENCY FOR
NON-ENFORCEMENT.
*
*
ACTUALLY, WHAT OBAMA REALLY MEANS WE
ARE A NATION OPEN TO FURTHER INVASION, OCCUPATION AND LA RAZA SUPREMACY IN
ORDER TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED FOR HIS WALL ST. PAYMASTERS!
THERE IS A REASON WHY OBAMA HAS
SABOTAGED E-VERIFY!
THERE IS A REASON WHY OBAMA USES TAX
DOLLARS TO FUND THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA (google CECELIA MUNOZ)
THERE IS A REASON WHY OBAMA’S SEC. of
(illegal) LABOR IS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS!
OBAMA’S I.C.E. IS ONE MORE AGENCY TO EXPAND HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS!
WILL THERE BE A WAR WITH MEXICO?
THERE ALREADY IS! THE MEX DRUG CARTELS
OPERATE IN 2,500 AMERICAN CITIES AND HAUL BACK $60 BILLION. THERE ARE 38
MILLION MEXICANS IN OUR BORDERS LOOTING OUR JOBS, WELFARE, AND VOTING FOR MORE
LA RAZA DEMS TO SERVICE THEM!
VIVA LA RAZA? PUSH 2 FOR ENGLISH AND TELL
ME!
*
They
claim all of North America for Mexico!
WHAT
IS THERE TO SAY ABOUT AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT THAT HAS CONTEMPT FOR OUR BORDERS
AND EVEN SABOTAGES THEM TO BUILD HIS LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS, HAS
CONTEMPT FOR OUR SOVEREIGNTY LAWS, SABOTAGES E-VERIFY TO ASSURE ILLEGALS GET
OUR JOBS, FIGHTS AGAINST VOTER I.D. TO ASSURE ILLEGALS EASY ACCESS (again) TO
OUR VOTING, AND SUES FOUR AMERICAN STATES ON BEHALF OF HIS LA RAZA AGENDA?????
NO
ADMINISTRATION IN HISTORY IS AS INFESTED WITH A FOREIGN POLITICAL PARTY AS
OBAMA’S IS WITH LA RAZA SUPREMACIST PARTY!
NO
PRESIDENT HAS HANDED SO MUCH TAX PAYER FUNDING
TO A FOREIGN PARTY AS OBAMA HAS IN FUNDING THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA
RAZA!
The Obama administration’s campaign to
suspend the deportations of most illegal aliens has been subject to intense
scrutiny since 2010, when the press uncovered a United States Citizenship and
Immigration Services memo that contemplated various “administrative
alternatives” to bypass Congress and implement stealth amnesty for illegal
aliens. A subsequent Houston Chronicle story exposed an effort by the
administration to suspend the deportations of illegal aliens who supposedly
have not been convicted of any “serious” crimes.
*
– including the dismissal of charges
against illegal alien criminals convicted of violent crimes.
*
“The court’s ruling shows the secrecy
games by the Obama DHS. Clearly the Obama administration wants to obscure the
truth about its lawless illegal alien deportation policy.
*
“The court’s ruling shows the secrecy
games by the Obama DHS. Clearly the Obama administration wants to obscure the
truth about its lawless illegal alien deportation policy.
*
The tough and outspoken president of
the National ICE Council, Chris Crane, has
opposed many of the president’s strategies, arguing that Obama’s policies force
ICE officials to disregard the law.
In separate statements, officials from the border patrol agents union have also criticized Obama's immigration and border security policies.
In separate statements, officials from the border patrol agents union have also criticized Obama's immigration and border security policies.
On one occasion, while testifying
before the House Judiciary subcommittee, Crane accused Obama of pandering to
Latino groups for political gain.
“Law enforcement and public safety have
taken a back seat to attempts to satisfy immigrant advocacy groups,” Crane told
the panel of congressmen.
*
COURT CRITICIZES OBAMA DHS ON STEALTH AMNESTY DOCUMENT
By NWV News Writer Jim Kouri
February 6, 2012
© 2012 NewsWithViews.com
February 6, 2012
© 2012 NewsWithViews.com
A watchdog group that investigates,
exposes and prosecutes government corruption announced Thursday that the United
States District Court for the District of Columbia issued a ruling criticizing
President Barack Obama’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for failing to
abide by Freedom
of Information Act
(FOIA) law.
According
to Jill Farrell, Director of Public Affairs for Judicial Watch, JW officials
filed their original FOIA request with DHS on August 30, 2010, and then
followed up with a lawsuit on March 23, 2011, after the DHS
stonewalled
the release of records.
The
Obama administration filed a Motion for Summary Judgment in the lawsuit on
August 4, 2011, asking the court to terminate the watchdog group’s lawsuit. U.S. District Judge Colleen
Kollar-Kotelly
granted DHS’s motion regarding some select records, but also denied the motion
in part and chastised the agency for its inadequate explanations as to why it
was withholding certain documents:
• Regarding assertions of
attorney-client privilege, the court listed a series of “egregious” examples
demonstrating DHS’s unwillingness to specify reasons for exempting documents
from disclosure and concluded, “In the end, DHS’s generalized and non-specific
showing fails to satisfy the court that the attorney-client privilege has been
properly invoked in connection with the information withheld from Judicial
Watch.”
• The court drew a similar conclusion
regarding memoranda and communications that DHS was withholding pursuant to the
attorney work product privilege, which protects materials “prepared in
anticipation of litigation or for trial by or for another party or its
representative.” The court ruled: “Absent a more particularized showing from
DHS, the Court cannot conclude that DHS has applied the appropriate standard in
this case…”
• Regarding the deliberative process
privilege, which protects “documents reflecting advisory opinions,
recommendations and deliberations comprising a part of the process by which
governmental decisions and policies are formulated,” Judge Kollar-Kotelly
wrote, “The Court agrees with Judicial Watch that DHS has failed to provide
sufficient factual context for much of the information withheld under the
deliberative process privilege to allow the Court to conclude that the
privilege has been properly invoked.”
Although the court had the ability to force disclosure under these circumstances, Judge Kollar-Kotelly allowed DHS one “final” opportunity to establish the applicability of these privileges to the information withheld from Judicial Watch.
The Obama administration’s campaign to
suspend the deportations of most illegal aliens has been subject to intense
scrutiny since 2010, when the press uncovered a United States Citizenship and
Immigration Services memo that contemplated various “administrative
alternatives” to bypass Congress and implement stealth amnesty for illegal
aliens. A subsequent Houston Chronicle story exposed an effort by the
administration to suspend the deportations of illegal aliens who supposedly
have not been convicted of any “serious” crimes.
Documents
previously uncovered by Judicial Watch show that DHS officials misled Congress
and the public about the scope of the immigration enforcement policy change,
which gave wide latitude to local immigration officials to dismiss illegal
alien deportation cases – including
the dismissal of charges against illegal alien criminals convicted of violent
crimes. The Obama administration announced recently that it would
effectively halt any enforcement actions (on an alleged “case-by-case” basis)
against any illegal alien who has not committed any other “serious” crimes.
“The court’s ruling shows the secrecy
games by the Obama DHS. Clearly the Obama administration wants to obscure the
truth about its lawless illegal alien deportation policy. The Obama DHS believes it should be
able to withhold records from the American people without explanation or
justification. We’re pleased the court would not allow DHS to continue its
contempt for FOIA law. We look forward to continuing our legal pursuit of these
records,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.
Illegal
Deportation Actions by Obama Administration
Aspart
of President Barack Obama's "new immigration and deportation
strategy," all U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers
must complete a training program that stresses removing high-risk offenders
while at the same time forgo the deportation of illegal immigrants with clean
records and strong ties to their communities, said the ICE officers' union
officials
on Friday.
According
to federal law enforcement officials, a majority of ICE’s commanding officers
and prosecuting attorneys have completed the training seminar, but the National
ICE Council, which represents agency’s more than 6,000 immigration officers,
has not allowed its members to enroll in the new training program.
The tough and outspoken president of
the National ICE Council, Chris Crane, has
opposed many of the president’s strategies, arguing that Obama’s policies force
ICE officials to disregard the law.
In separate statements, officials from the border patrol agents union have also criticized Obama's immigration and border security policies.
In separate statements, officials from the border patrol agents union have also criticized Obama's immigration and border security policies.
On one occasion, while testifying
before the House Judiciary subcommittee, Crane accused Obama of pandering to
Latino groups for political gain.
“Law enforcement and public safety have
taken a back seat to attempts to satisfy immigrant advocacy groups,” Crane told
the panel of congressmen.
*
“What we're seeing is our Congress and
national leadership dismantling our laws by not enforcing them. Lawlessness
becomes the norm, just like Third World corruption. Illegal aliens now have
more rights and privileges than Americans. If you are an illegal alien, you can
drive a car without a driver's license or insurance. You may obtain medical
care without paying. You may work without paying taxes. Your children enjoy
free education at the expense of taxpaying Americans.”
THE LA RAZA PRESIDENT’S
SABOTAGE OF OUR COUNTRY’S BORDERS FOR ILLEGALS’ VOTES!
*
“PUNISH
OUR ENEMIES”… does that mean assault the legals of Arizona that must fend off
the Mexican invasion, occupation, growing criminal and welfare state, as well
as Mex Drug cartels???
OBAMA
TELLS ILLEGALS “PUNISH OUR ENEMIES”
Friends of ALIPAC,
Each day new reports come in from across the nation that our movement is surging and more incumbents, mostly Democrats, are about to fall on Election Day. Obama's approval ratings are falling to new lows as he makes highly inappropriate statements to Spanish language audiences asking illegal alien supporters to help him "punish our enemies."
Each day new reports come in from across the nation that our movement is surging and more incumbents, mostly Democrats, are about to fall on Election Day. Obama's approval ratings are falling to new lows as he makes highly inappropriate statements to Spanish language audiences asking illegal alien supporters to help him "punish our enemies."
*
“While
the declining job market in the United States may be discouraging some would-be
border crossers, a flow of illegal aliens continues unabated, with many
entering the United States as drug-smuggling “mules.”
*
*
As the
liberal news media, far-left Democrats, and labor unions push for the
“Hispanicazation” of U.S. culture, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary
Janet Napolitano says the U.S. border has never been more secure.
*
*
HISPANDERING LA RAZA
ENDORSED HILLARY BLAMES AMERICAN AGAIN FOR MEX INVASION SHE AND BILLARY HELPED
CREATE!
In Mexico City, she
announced that the U.S. appetite for illegal drugs and the easy acquisition of
guns from the United States by Mexicans are the root causes of the Mexican
crime wave. “Blame America” has become the global agenda of the Democratic
Party.
*
Newsmax
Obama's
'Hispanicazation' of America
Monday, January 10, 2011
08:28 AM
By: James
Walsh
Casting a shadow on economic recovery efforts in
the United States is the cost of illegal immigration that consumes U.S.
taxpayer dollars for education, healthcare, social welfare benefits, and
criminal justice. Illegal aliens (or more politically correct, “undocumented
immigrants”) with ties to Mexican drug cartels are contributing to death and
destruction on U.S. lands along the southern border.
While the declining job market in the United States may be discouraging some would-be border crossers, a flow of illegal aliens continues unabated, with many entering the United States as drug-smuggling “mules.”
Increasingly vicious foot soldiers of the Mexican drug cartels are taking control of U.S. lands along the border, especially since U.S. Border Patrol units have been reassigned, some to offices 60 to 80 miles inland.
The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) early last year posted signs warning citizens to avoid Interstate 8 between Casa Grande and Gila Bend, Ariz., because of criminal activity in the area, an area that includes protected natural areas precious to the nation.
In reaction to public outrage over the signs, the BLM removed the offensive wording in October 2010, replacing it with the following: Visitor Information Update—Active Federal Law Enforcement Patrol Area.
As the liberal news media, far-left Democrats, and labor unions push for the “Hispanicazation” of U.S. culture, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says the U.S. border has never been more secure.
Perhaps she is basing this on the reduced number of apprehensions, which result, of course, from reassigning Border Patrol agents inland.
In a recent New York Times article, Nicholas Kristof criticized U.S. citizens for not speaking a foreign language and suggested that “Every child in the United States should learn Spanish.” He concluded that as the United States increasingly integrates economically with Latin America, Spanish will be crucial for the United States.
For decades, the liberal left has argued that Latin America is essential for U.S. business and trade. Kristof states that Latin America “is finally getting its act together” but fails to mention the Obama administration’s $2 billion loan of U.S. taxpayer money in 2009 to Brazil’s Petrobras oil company for deep off-shore oil drilling. Obama confidant George Soros, through the Soros Fund Management LLC, until recently owned millions of dollars of Petrobras stock.
Kristof suggests that one day Spanish-speaking Americans will be part of daily life in the United States and that workmen such as mechanics will be able to communicate easily with Spanish-speaking customers.
He fails to explain why these customers will not be speaking English. After all, the ability to speak, read, and write English remains a requirement for U.S. citizenship.
President Barack Obama gives lip service to increasing border control resources with limited funding and personnel. Many officials, including the governors of Texas and Arizona, are skeptical regarding the Obama administration’s resolve. They resent that the United States is being blamed for the killing fields on both sides of the Mexico-U.S. Border.
For instance, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in March 2009, during her first official visit to Mexico, placed the blame for the Mexican drug cartels’ vicious murders on the United States.
In Mexico City, she announced that the U.S. appetite for illegal drugs and the easy acquisition of guns from the United States by Mexicans are the root causes of the Mexican crime wave. “Blame America” has become the global agenda of the Democratic Party.
The Obama administration’s plan to resolve the immigration chaos is to offer amnesty to all comers. President Obama re-affirms his support of a “pathway to citizenship” (amnesty) for illegal aliens in 2011.
The administration, however, has announced no plans to control the influx of future waves of illegal aliens or their skyrocketing costs to the nation. The administration, which condones U.S. sanctuary cities and states, has no plans to file charges against them for violations of federal immigration law. Nor does the administration seem concerned about the environmental impact that illegal aliens have on the ecology of the United States.
Many national forests, parks, monuments, wilderness areas, and wildlife refuges — once the pride of the nation — are serving today as marijuana fields for illegal alien gangs.
Former Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi reportedly said to a gathering of illegal aliens in California in 2009 that U.S. immigration laws were “un-American,” suggesting that they need not be obeyed. Concerned citizens can only trust that the new speaker of the House, John Boehner, as part of congressional oversight of federal agencies, will demand enforcement of existing immigration laws.
When will President Obama recognize that illegal immigration is slowing economic recovery? Can he resolve the chaos while still appeasing his Hispanic base?
To maintain his populist aura, the president is in the habit of saying one thing to one audience and the opposite to another.
One Obama apologist explained, “Campaign rhetoric is one thing,” suggesting that governing is another. The deliberate Hispanicazation of the United States to secure a block of votes is quite another.
While the declining job market in the United States may be discouraging some would-be border crossers, a flow of illegal aliens continues unabated, with many entering the United States as drug-smuggling “mules.”
Increasingly vicious foot soldiers of the Mexican drug cartels are taking control of U.S. lands along the border, especially since U.S. Border Patrol units have been reassigned, some to offices 60 to 80 miles inland.
The U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) early last year posted signs warning citizens to avoid Interstate 8 between Casa Grande and Gila Bend, Ariz., because of criminal activity in the area, an area that includes protected natural areas precious to the nation.
In reaction to public outrage over the signs, the BLM removed the offensive wording in October 2010, replacing it with the following: Visitor Information Update—Active Federal Law Enforcement Patrol Area.
As the liberal news media, far-left Democrats, and labor unions push for the “Hispanicazation” of U.S. culture, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano says the U.S. border has never been more secure.
Perhaps she is basing this on the reduced number of apprehensions, which result, of course, from reassigning Border Patrol agents inland.
In a recent New York Times article, Nicholas Kristof criticized U.S. citizens for not speaking a foreign language and suggested that “Every child in the United States should learn Spanish.” He concluded that as the United States increasingly integrates economically with Latin America, Spanish will be crucial for the United States.
For decades, the liberal left has argued that Latin America is essential for U.S. business and trade. Kristof states that Latin America “is finally getting its act together” but fails to mention the Obama administration’s $2 billion loan of U.S. taxpayer money in 2009 to Brazil’s Petrobras oil company for deep off-shore oil drilling. Obama confidant George Soros, through the Soros Fund Management LLC, until recently owned millions of dollars of Petrobras stock.
Kristof suggests that one day Spanish-speaking Americans will be part of daily life in the United States and that workmen such as mechanics will be able to communicate easily with Spanish-speaking customers.
He fails to explain why these customers will not be speaking English. After all, the ability to speak, read, and write English remains a requirement for U.S. citizenship.
President Barack Obama gives lip service to increasing border control resources with limited funding and personnel. Many officials, including the governors of Texas and Arizona, are skeptical regarding the Obama administration’s resolve. They resent that the United States is being blamed for the killing fields on both sides of the Mexico-U.S. Border.
For instance, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in March 2009, during her first official visit to Mexico, placed the blame for the Mexican drug cartels’ vicious murders on the United States.
In Mexico City, she announced that the U.S. appetite for illegal drugs and the easy acquisition of guns from the United States by Mexicans are the root causes of the Mexican crime wave. “Blame America” has become the global agenda of the Democratic Party.
The Obama administration’s plan to resolve the immigration chaos is to offer amnesty to all comers. President Obama re-affirms his support of a “pathway to citizenship” (amnesty) for illegal aliens in 2011.
The administration, however, has announced no plans to control the influx of future waves of illegal aliens or their skyrocketing costs to the nation. The administration, which condones U.S. sanctuary cities and states, has no plans to file charges against them for violations of federal immigration law. Nor does the administration seem concerned about the environmental impact that illegal aliens have on the ecology of the United States.
Many national forests, parks, monuments, wilderness areas, and wildlife refuges — once the pride of the nation — are serving today as marijuana fields for illegal alien gangs.
Former Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi reportedly said to a gathering of illegal aliens in California in 2009 that U.S. immigration laws were “un-American,” suggesting that they need not be obeyed. Concerned citizens can only trust that the new speaker of the House, John Boehner, as part of congressional oversight of federal agencies, will demand enforcement of existing immigration laws.
When will President Obama recognize that illegal immigration is slowing economic recovery? Can he resolve the chaos while still appeasing his Hispanic base?
To maintain his populist aura, the president is in the habit of saying one thing to one audience and the opposite to another.
One Obama apologist explained, “Campaign rhetoric is one thing,” suggesting that governing is another. The deliberate Hispanicazation of the United States to secure a block of votes is quite another.
NEW YORK TIMES – MEX
OWNED MOUTHPIECE FOR LA RAZA PROPAGANDA
August 26, 2010
Immigration Agency Ends Some Deportations
Immigration enforcement officials have
started to cancel the deportations of thousands of immigrants they have
detained, a policy they said would pare huge case backlogs in the immigration
courts.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials said the new
approach was part of a broad shift in priorities at the agency, to focus its
efforts on catching and deporting immigrants who have been convicted of crimes
or pose a national security threat. The policy — announced in an Aug. 20
memorandum from John Morton, the head of the agency — drew praise from
immigrant advocates, who called it a common-sense strategy, and was denounced by several Republicans as
evidence that the Obama administration was weakening enforcement and making it
easier for illegal immigrants to remain in the country.
OBAMA JUST HEADED I.C.E. WITH AN OPEN BORDERS – LA RAZA PARTY MEMBER!
The change in emphasis at
the immigration agency, which represents a significant break with longstanding
practices, has awakened resistance among agents and detention officers on the
ground, according to officials of the agency, which is known as ICE, and of the
union representing those employees.
Mr. Morton’s memorandum refers to a particular
group of illegal immigrants: those who have been detained in ICE operations
because they did not have legal status, but who have active applications in the
system to become legal residents. The
memo encourages ICE officers and lawyers to use their authority to dismiss
those cases, canceling the deportation proceedings, if they determine that the
immigrants have no criminal records and stand a strong chance of having their
residence applications approved.
The policy is intended to
address a “major inefficiency” that has led to an unnecessary pileup of cases
in the immigration courts, Mr. Morton said. The courts have reported at least
17,000 cases that could be eliminated from their docket if ICE dismissed
deportations of immigrants, like those married to United States citizens, who
were very likely to win legal status, the memo says.
To resolve that number of
deportation cases, officials will have to fix persistent breakdowns in
coordination between two federal agencies that oversee the nation’s
overburdened and troubled immigration system, ICE officials acknowledged. On
one hand, ICE enforces immigration law. Another agency, Citizenship and Immigration Services, is in charge of approving
applications for immigration documents. When ICE opens a deportation case
against an immigrant, it is heard in immigration court.
*
247,922 CASES IN
IMMIGRATION COURTS – THAT LEAVES 38 MILLION ILLEGALS STILL IN OUR JOBS,
WELFARE, OR JAILS!
*
The courts are swamped
under a backlog that reached a record in June of 247,922 cases, according to
the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse, a research group at Syracuse University that analyzes federal
data. The average waiting time for cases in those courts was 459 days.
But immigration lawyers
said they are currently waiting as long as two years to get a hearing date in
some especially crowded immigration courts.
The new policy “is a pretty
basic, common-sense thing to do,” said Helen Harnett, policy director for the National Immigrant Justice Center, a legal assistance group
in Chicago. She said that if an immigrant’s application for legal residence was
ultimately denied, ICE could reinstate the deportation.
“This is for people who do
have a path to legalize their status,” said Mary Meg McCarthy, director of the
justice center. “This does not create a new path to legalization for anyone.”
BUT REPUBLICAN LAWMAKERS
SAID THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION WAS MOVING TOWARD A DE FACTO LEGALIZATION PROGRAM
BY ALLOWING SOME ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS TO REMAIN HERE DESPITE THEIR VIOLATIONS OF
THE LAW!
But Republican lawmakers
said the Obama administration was moving toward a de facto legalization program
by allowing some illegal immigrants to remain here despite their violations of
the law.
“Actions like this
demoralize ICE agents who are trying to do their job and enforce the law,” said
Senator Charles E. Grassley, Republican of Iowa.
“Unfortunately, it appears this is more evidence that the Obama administration
would rather circumvent Congress and give a free pass to illegal immigrants who
have already broken our law.”
Mr. Morton’s memorandum was
first reported this week in The Houston Chronicle, which found that some
immigrants in Texas had already seen their deportations canceled.
ICE officials said they
arrived at the policy after conferring with immigration court officials. “This
is not a backdoor amnesty,” said Beth Gibson, assistant deputy director of ICE.
“It is really about efficient use of docket space and smart use of everybody’s
scarce resources.”
*
WHO LET 167,000 WITH
CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS IN??? BUT THEN WHO LET THE NEARLY ONE MILLION (source CNN)
MEX GANG MEMBERS IN???
*
The agency has deported a
record number of 167,000 immigrants with criminal convictions in the past year,
ICE officials said, an increase of about 43 percent over the previous year.
However, dissension in the
ranks at ICE surfaced on June 25, when a local of the American Federation of Government Employees representing some
enforcement and detention officers announced that it had taken a vote of no
confidence in Mr. Morton.
*
THE OBAMA MISSION OF
NO-ENFORCEMENT
*
The director and other
senior ICE officials had “abandoned the agency’s core mission of enforcing
United States immigration laws,” the local said in a news release, undertaking
“reckless and misguided initiatives” while failing to alert Congress to the
need for more manpower and funds for ICE.
Chris Crane, the president
of the local, did not respond to an e-mail message on Thursday.
The national president of
the federation, John Gage, said the union had not yet taken a position on the
issues raised by the local. Mr. Gage said after several ICE locals had
complained, he called a meeting next week of representatives of all of the
federation’s locals that represent ICE employees.
“I really would like to get
some facts,” Mr. Gage said Thursday. “Our ICE officers have real concerns, but
there is conflicting information. If there is any increased risk to our people,
we will be all over it,” he said.
*
FAIRUS.org
The
Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy
According
to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or
otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the
department.
By
Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The
setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a
“Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing.
Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration
and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a
mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United
States.
Arguing
the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she
described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the
administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to
serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and
workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”
Acknowledging
that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to
effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of
previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to
reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.
“For
starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where
it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight,
she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country
as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its
approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the
interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed
worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”
If
Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP
speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he
wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data
to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.
According
to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or
otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the
department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894 miles of
border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with protecting. As for
the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the
same 894 miles.
The
administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is
just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers
shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that
administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between
2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for
criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments,
and won 63 percent fewer convictions.
While
the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President
Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite
enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The
administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them
with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the
payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no
adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the
illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set
of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers
willing to accept substandard wages.
In
Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under
“effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of
immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard
to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything,
the administration’s record has left the public less confident that promises of
future immigration enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re
printed on.
As
Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy,
they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that
they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all
but sawed off. The second – increased admissions of extended family members and
workers – makes little sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed
or relegated to part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal
aliens – is anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.
As
Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually
accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to
enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this
administration is “Mission Aborted.”
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
*
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.
Monday, September 28, 2009
And T.J. BONNER, president of the National Border Patrol Council, will weigh in on the federal government’s decision to pull nearly 400 agents from the U.S.-Mexican border. As always, Lou will take your calls to discuss the issues that matter most-and to get your thoughts on where America is headed.
*
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
INVESTORS.com
Amnesty In Disguise
Posted 08/10/2010 06:51 PM ET
Border: After suing Arizona to assert federal supremacy over states on
immigration, it turns out that ICE, Washington's immigration cop on the beat,
isn't enforcing the law at all. This is amnesty by another name.
Oh, what a hullabaloo the Justice Department made last month
over Arizona's SB 1070, arguing before a federal district judge that the law
must be struck down because the federal government has "pre-eminent
authority to regulate immigration matters."
Arizona's effort was depicted as some sort of secessionist
usurpation of federal prerogatives, despite the fact that SB 1070 mirrored
federal law.
Incredibly, Judge Susan Bolton, an appointee of President
Clinton, agreed and issued an injunction on those grounds.
In practical terms, her decision means that Arizona's 15,000
lawmen could not help federal agents enforce the law on America's largest and
most dangerous immigrant-smuggling corridor.
Now it's obvious why: The Justice Department isn't interested in
enforcing the law.
Last week, 259 representatives of the union that represents
7,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents handed down a unanimous vote
of "no confidence" in ICE leaders, whose policies keep them from
doing their job.
Based on those policies, agents can no longer arrest illegal
immigrants even if they announce their status on a sandwich board.
According to a June 29 memo from ICE Assistant Secretary John
Morton, ICE must now "prioritize the apprehension and removal of aliens
who only pose a threat to national security and/or public safety, such as
criminals and terrorists."
Given that all police agencies look for such targets, such a
premise is absurd. Oklahoma City bomber Timothy McVeigh, after all, was
arrested by a traffic cop, not a fancy anti-terror strike force, in 1995.
And aside from wondering why terrorists are being released at
all across a border they'll have no trouble recrossing, Morton's policy
effectively means no one is looking for illegal immigrants once they make it
past the Border Patrol.
This is taking pick-and-choose law enforcement to an extreme and
runs counter to best police practices, such as James Q. Wilson's "broken
window" theory of criminology. This holds that enforcement against minor
crimes in an area helps prevent an escalation into more serious crime.
ICE's Morton claims the agency has limited resources, so it can
deport only 400,000 illegal immigrants a year. From a government agency with a
$2.6 billion detention and removal budget, that comes to about $6,500 per
deportee, a de facto statement of government inefficiency and waste. And it
affects only 4% of all illegal border-crossers.
*
Tension over Obama policies within
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
By Andrew Becker
Friday, August 27, 2010; B03
Friday, August 27, 2010; B03
As it poises for
further immigration initiatives, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is
struggling with festering internal divisions between political appointees and
career officials over how to enforce laws and handle detainees facing
deportation.
Under the Obama
administration, the Department of Homeland Security has shifted its focus away
from the worksite raids and sweeps employed during George W. Bush's presidency
to deporting more criminals and creating less prisonlike detention settings.
But ICE, a branch of DHS, is facing intensified resistance from agency middle
managers and attorneys, and the union that represents immigration officers.
The internal conflict
has grown increasingly public over ICE's plans, among them to expand a risk
assessment tool to guide agents on detention decisions, cut down on transfers
of detained immigrants, and open more "civil" detention facilities --
what field directors call "soft" detention.
Immigration officers
say the new measures limit their enforcement efforts and the revamped lockups
will compromise their safety. In June, their union took the unprecedented step
of issuing a vote of no confidence in the agency's director, John Morton, and the
official overseeing detention reform, Phyllis Coven.
Months before that,
the 24 field managers who oversee detention and deportation sent a memorandum
to Morton that challenged a number of recommended changes. Current and former
ICE attorneys in New York, Houston and other offices nationwide say they are
angry that they have been instructed to drop efforts to deport some immigrants.
"We can't find a
supervisor or manager that supports Morton or his initiatives," said Chris
Crane, president of the American Federation of Government Employees' National
Council 118, the union that issued the no-confidence vote.
Many of the measures,
set to be implemented in the coming weeks and months, may not require a
conversation with the union, but ICE leadership seeks the union's viewpoint on
issues tied most closely to immigration reform, said Beth Gibson, ICE's
assistant deputy director.
"We are at the
beginning of a big push," Gibson said in an interview. "We are about
to come up on a series of things I see as incredibly powerful pieces of
reform."
Crane said the union
wants to negotiate over implementation, which could delay some changes.
The criticisms of ICE
illustrate the obstacles the Obama administration must navigate in selling the
changes to the ranks while trying to appear both tough on enforcement and
serious about fixing the nation's immigration laws. The friction between the
agency's leadership and managers tasked with instituting the changes reflects
the nation's split over immigration.
A senior White House
official, acknowledging the rift between ICE leadership and boots-on-the-ground
employees, said the union's unusual posture of addressing policy sent a message
consistent with groups that espouse tougher immigration restrictions.
"The call from
the left is John Morton is too tough. The guy is leading the effort to remove
more people from the country than ever before," said the official, who
spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal matters. "That others
say he's soft on enforcement strikes me as remarkable. At the end of the day,
it's about sound law-and-order principles, not decisions based on the political
wind."
Several current and
former immigration officers, senior managers and attorneys, however, said in
interviews that the agency's leadership regularly changes course on policy,
apparently based on the political climate. Attorneys point to an ongoing review
of pending cases and the dismissal of deportation charges against some
immigrants without serious criminal records.
Michael D. Rozos Sr.,
who retired May 1 as one of the agency's most senior field managers, said he
left his position in Miami "several years early" out of frustration
that the agency was moving backward toward the years of the Immigration and
Naturalization Service. The defunct agency became part of ICE when DHS was
created in 2002.
"I see a repeat
of what the INS was like, which was chasing its tail," Rozos said.
"They're trying to go in every direction and end up going in
circles."
Rozos was one of the
24 field managers who sent a 19-page memo, obtained by the Center for
Investigative Reporting, that outlined objections to an October report widely
adopted as the detention-policy playbook. They also complained that their input
was never sought.
"The Report
seems to advocate that an entirely 'soft' detention system would be the
ideal," the memo states. "In reality, there is a significant
population with criminal convictions, arrest histories, gang affiliation,
psychological issues, drug abuse, etc., and these individuals pose a flight
risk or security risk to ICE officers, other detainees and, at times,
themselves."
The "soft"
detention facilities will house low-risk detainees without criminal records in
less restrictive settings while giving more access to recreation.
One of the new civil
detention sites, the James Musick Facility, is a non-working farm near Los
Angeles, Gibson said. Other lockups will open in San Francisco, Miami, Chicago
and elsewhere to cut down on transfers.
ICE spokesman Brian
P. Hale said the agency remains committed to reform, despite the internal
rumblings. "There are significant numbers that are in agreement and
support our effort," Hale said. "Our challenge and ultimate goal is
to stay focused and successfully implement our goals."
ICE might not be
alone in facing a backlash. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) in July released a
leaked draft memo from ICE's sister agency, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services, which outlined administrative remedies if a legislative fix falls
short.
The memo angered
Republicans, who said it proved the Obama administration wants to circumvent
Congress to provide amnesty to thousands of illegal immigrants.
Janice Kephart of the
Center for Immigration Studies, which advocates for immigration restrictions,
said agents are frustrated because they feel they aren't allowed to do their
jobs to fully enforce the law. Frank Sharry, executive director of the
pro-immigration-reform group America's Voice, said ICE is run by "a bunch
of political appointees on top of a rogue agency."
Doris Meissner, who
as INS commissioner in the 1990s saw similar tensions, said the union's message
is a "severe internal pushback."
"It is a
barometer of how difficult it is to make change and how they have to really
work it internally as well as externally," added Meissner, a senior fellow
at the Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan Washington think tank.
Though ideological
differences pose a challenge, they are not insurmountable, Meissner said,
adding that she expects ICE employees to follow the new policies. The
dissension, fostered by the country's polarization over immigration, is a
product of legislative inaction, she said.
"Congress hasn't
moved forward with the legislation that the administration envisioned, which
puts ICE in the middle of the fray," she said. "The only thing
happening with immigration in the country is enforcement."
Andrew Becker is a
reporter for the Center for Investigative Reporting.
*
Obama to
Bypass Congress and Grant Amnesty through Executive Fiat?
Over the last month,
conservatives have speculated that President Obama might bypass Congress and
grant blanket amnesty to millions of illegal aliens currently residing in the
United States by way of executive fiat. According to a controversial new “draft”
report crafted by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service (USCIS), this
lawless Obama administration scheme is more than mere rumor. It is a detailed
and well-thought-out strategy.
Sen. David Vitter,
R-La., on Sunday said he and his colleagues are still looking for answers on
whether the administration has seriously considered mass legalization for
illegal immigrants, after an administration memo surfaced outlining ways to
grant legalization without going through Congress.
The draft memo, first
obtained by Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley’s office from the U.S.
Citizenship & Immigration Services, outlines ways the administration was
exploring to legalize swaths of illegal immigrants “in the absence of
Comprehensive Immigration Reform.” The memo describes how to, “reduce the
threat of removal for certain individuals present in the United States without
authorization.”
Of course the Obama
administration is trying to downplay the significance of the memo. But these
denials ring hollow. And no one can deny the intent of the memo.
You don’t even have
to read past the subject header of the memo to get a clue as to what the USCIS
is up to: “Administrative Alternatives to Comprehensive Illegal Immigration
Reform.” Is there any way to misread the objective here? Clearly the USCIS expended
a considerable amount of effort trying to sneak this past Congress in order to
implement the President’s illegal alien amnesty plan.
But even if you’re
someone who believes you can’t judge a memo by its title, let’s take a look at
some excerpts from the USCIS document so you can judge for yourself. (You can
also read the entire memo for yourself by clicking here).
- Options
The
following items - used alone or in combination - have the potential to result
in meaningful immigration reform absent legislative action.
- Allow TPS [Temporary Protected
Status] Applicants Who Entered Without Inspection to Adjust or Change
Status
…Thus,
USCIS should no longer adhere to the 1990 General Counsel opinions, and instead
permit individuals in TPS to adjust or change status. Opening this pathway will
help thousands of applicants obtain lawful permanent residence without having
to leave the U.S.
- Expand the Use of Parole-in-Place
USCIS
has the discretionary authority under [federal law] to parole into the U.S. on
a case-by-case basis for “urgent humanitarian reasons” or “significant public
benefit” any applicant for admission…Granting parole to aliens in the U.S. who
have not been admitted or paroled is commonly referred to as “parole-in-place”
(PIP). By granting PIP, USCIS can eliminate the need for qualified recipients
to return to their home country for consular processing, particularly when
doing so might trigger a bar to returning.
- Lessen the Standard for
Demonstrating Extreme Hardship
…By
statute, DHS has discretion to waive these grounds of inadmissibility for
spouses, sons and daughters of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents if
the refusal to admit these individuals would result in extreme hardship for
their qualifying relatives. Generally the “extreme hardship” standard has been
narrowly construed by USCIS. To increase the number of individuals applying for
waivers, and improve their chances for receiving them, CIS could issue guidance
or regulation specifying a lower evidentiary standard for “extreme hardship.”
- Increase the Use of Deferred
Action
…USCIS
has previously allowed the use of deferred action to provide relief to
non-immigrants whose period of admission had expired, or otherwise had failed
to maintain lawful immigrant status…While it is theoretically possible to grant
deferred action to an unrestricted number of unlawfully present individuals,
doing so would likely be controversial, not to mention expensive…Rather than
making deferred action widely available to hundreds of thousands and as a
non-legislative version of “amnesty,” USCIS could tailor the use of this
discretionary option for particular groups….
The memo goes on for
about 11 pages with other recommendations that I cannot adequately cover in
this space, so do consider taking the time to read the document for yourself. I’ve reviewed tens of
thousands of government documents in my 12-plus years here at Judicial Watch.
So it is not insignificant for me to say that this memo is about the most
brazen and shocking government document I’ve ever reviewed.
Republicans and,
eventually, even Democrats are unlikely to let this matter drop. In fact, according to Fox News, Republican members of the Senate
Judiciary Committee have written to Chairman Leahy demanding the matter be
investigated by the Committee: “We are very concerned about the options
outlined in the memo and are troubled that the executive branch could be
engaged in an effort to inappropriately expand its authority to ensure illegal
immigrants are not removed from the United States and are given access to
various immigration benefits, including potential green card status," the
Senators wrote.
Let’s sum up. Obama’s
top political appointees in the agency charged with enforcing our immigration
laws are spending their time thinking of ways not to enforce the law and how to
bypass the elected representatives of the people to grant mass amnesty through
a raw abuse of executive power.
Obama and his
appointees are obviously impatient with the niceties of the U.S. Constitution
and the rule of law. We already knew they’re against the rule of law with their
coordinated and dishonest attack on Arizona’s SB 1070. This latest memo shows
they’d be happy to throw the rule of law out entirely when it comes to
immigration.
Judicial Watch is
hard at work. We already had a Freedom of Information Act request in place on
the secret amnesty plan, and we plan to expand our investigation in light of
the new memo.
*
JUDICIAL WATCH
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
OBAMA TELLS LA RAZA I.C.E. TO LEAVE HIS
ILLEGALS ALONE! MEX SUPREMACY OBAMA STYLE!
ICE Won’t Arrest Illegal Aliens Caught
In Traffic Stops
Last Updated: Tue,
08/24/2010 - 2:53pm
In
its latest surreptitious effort to protect illegal immigrants the Obama
Administration plans to prohibit both federal and local law enforcement
officers from arresting undocumented aliens discovered as a result of traffic
violations.
It
marks the third time this month that a covert plan to shield illegal aliens
from deportation gets exposed. A few weeks ago the administration ordered
authorities to halt the removal of
some 700,000 illegal immigrants
who are students while lawmakers craft legislation to officially spare them
from expulsion. Weeks earlier an internal Homeland Security document revealed
that the president has a secret backup plan to grant illegal immigrants amnesty in
case Congress doesn’t pass legislation to do it.
This
week’s plan du jour is to shield illegal immigrants who break U.S. law by
operating a vehicle without a license or driving recklessly, possibly
endangering innocent Americans. A draft policy issued by Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) says that agency Chief John Morton intends to prohibit his
agents as well as local law enforcement officers from detaining illegal aliens
stopped during traffic violations.
The
three-page ICE memo was made public this week by a
research organization dedicated to studying immigration issues. Even police
departments that participate in the local-federal partnership known as 287(g)
will be prohibited from apprehending or reporting an illegal alien in the
course of a traffic stop. Federal agents will be forbidden from issuing what’s
known as an immigration detainer unless the illegal alien has committed a
separate criminal violation.
Morton
is implementing the new measure in response to the “many concerns” of immigration enforcement critics
(i.e. open borders, La Raza movement) who believe local police abuse their
authority to arrest “innocent” illegal aliens in order to have them deported.
That’s according to an ICE political appointee who discourages cooperation
between local and federal authorities.
Never
mind that local police across the country regularly encounter unlicensed
illegal immigrants operating unsafe vehicles, smuggling other undocumented
aliens or plotting serious crime sprees. Two of the 9/11 hijackers (Ziad Jarrah
and Nawaf al-Hazmi) had been stopped for speeding by police in separate states
but were not detained even though they were in the U.S. illegally.
Jarrah
was ticketed by a Maryland State trooper just days before he boarded United
Airlines Flight 93, which crashed into a Pennsylvania field, and al-Hazmi, one
of the 9/11 masterminds, got pulled over in Oklahoma around eight months before
he crashed American Airlines Flight 77 to the Pentagon.
*
U.S.
Spares “Noncriminal” Illegal Immigrants
Wed, 10/06/2010 - 11:18am
As federal immigration
officials celebrate an increase in the removal of illegal aliens with criminal
records, the reality is that there has been a drastic decline in deportations
of undocumented aliens deemed “noncriminal” by the government.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) revealed in a news
story this
week that more illegal immigrants with criminal convictions have been deported
in recent years. This is driving up the number of people being removed from the
United States, according to the article which was published in a northern
California paper.
The story has a colorful graph that helps illustrate how
convicted criminals have made up an increasing percentage of U.S. deportations
in the past few years. Of the 350,000 removed this year, the story says, more
than half were convicted for crimes. That marks a 55% increase since 2008,
according to ICE data provided for the article.
While this may sound wonderful, the agency admits it’s
essentially ignoring illegal immigrants who don’t have serious criminal
histories, leading to a 30% drop in the number of so-called “noncriminal
deportations.” Those figures include what ICE refers to as “voluntary
departures,” illegal aliens who are actually given an option to return to their
home country willingly.
The statistics demonstrate a shift in the agency’s priorities to
focus on extracting the most dangerous criminals, according to the feds’ public
relations campaign. “But if we are looking at a guy who’s just here with his
family trying to better his life vs. a repeat offender, our priority is the
criminal,” said a northern California ICE field director.
Americans will never know the magnitude of the agency’s
selective deportation program because it’s illegally withholding data about its
overall enforcement performance, despite President Obama’s promise to create an
unprecedented level of openness in government.
Earlier this week an independent research center that monitors
the federal government revealed that ICE has committed serious legal and
procedural violations for failing to disclose performance data on how the agency is
enforcing immigration laws. In doing so, ICE is violating long standing
provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) as well as its own
administrative rules and policies set by the Department of Justice.
*
REALITY CHECK: HOMELAND SECURITY is now HOMELAND SECURITY = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP… Obama has no intentions of keeping illegals out. For him and the La Raza dems, Boxer, Feinstein, Clinton, Pelosi and Reid… they’re only “UNREGISTERED VOTERS”!
*
The numbers come in the middle of a heated national
debate on immigration. Republicans and Democrats alike have called on the
administration to pursue more vigorous enforcement, both on the border and in
the interior, but Ms. Napolitano said federal officials have to use their
limited resources to try to take the biggest public safety threats off the
streets, which means focusing on aliens with serious criminal records.
More criminal aliens deported last year
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/oct/6/more-criminal-aliens-deported-last-year/
President Obama's new immigration enforcement strategy led to a record number of criminal aliens being deported last year, but removals of other illegal immigrants fell to the lowest rate since 2007, before the Bush administration began a crackdown.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deported 392,862 aliens in fiscal year 2010, slightly less than a 1 percent increase over 2009 but short of the agency's goal to remove 400,000 this year.
Still, the administration said its new focus on immigrants with criminal records is paying off, with about half of those deported in 2010 being convicted criminals. In 2009, when 389,834 immigrants were deported, only about one-third of them had criminal records.
"This administration takes very, very seriously the responsibility to secure the borders and enforce immigration laws," Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said in announcing the numbers Wednesday. The fiscal year ended Sept. 30.
The numbers come in the middle of a heated national debate on immigration. Republicans and Democrats alike have called on the administration to pursue more vigorous enforcement, both on the border and in the interior, but Ms. Napolitano said federal officials have to use their limited resources to try to take the biggest public safety threats off the streets, which means focusing on aliens with serious criminal records.
She and Mr. Obama have tried to cut a middle ground between those who favor a crackdown and the immigrant rights groups who want to see fewer deportations.
But by following that new course, ICE has fallen down on other basic enforcement, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee.
He said administrative arrests of illegal immigrant workers are down 77 percent under Mr. Obama, criminal arrests are down 60 percent and convictions are down 68 percent.
"Worksite enforcement has been all but forgotten by the Obama administration," the Texas Republican said. "Millions of Americans are struggling to find work, while an estimated 7 million illegal immigrants are working in the U.S. Worksite enforcement could help make those much-needed jobs available for U.S. citizen and legal immigrant workers."
Meanwhile, immigrant rights groups said the government is still not doing enough to limit deportations.
President Obama's new immigration enforcement strategy led to a record number of criminal aliens being deported last year, but removals of other illegal immigrants fell to the lowest rate since 2007, before the Bush administration began a crackdown.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement deported 392,862 aliens in fiscal year 2010, slightly less than a 1 percent increase over 2009 but short of the agency's goal to remove 400,000 this year.
Still, the administration said its new focus on immigrants with criminal records is paying off, with about half of those deported in 2010 being convicted criminals. In 2009, when 389,834 immigrants were deported, only about one-third of them had criminal records.
"This administration takes very, very seriously the responsibility to secure the borders and enforce immigration laws," Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said in announcing the numbers Wednesday. The fiscal year ended Sept. 30.
The numbers come in the middle of a heated national debate on immigration. Republicans and Democrats alike have called on the administration to pursue more vigorous enforcement, both on the border and in the interior, but Ms. Napolitano said federal officials have to use their limited resources to try to take the biggest public safety threats off the streets, which means focusing on aliens with serious criminal records.
She and Mr. Obama have tried to cut a middle ground between those who favor a crackdown and the immigrant rights groups who want to see fewer deportations.
But by following that new course, ICE has fallen down on other basic enforcement, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, ranking Republican on the House Judiciary Committee.
He said administrative arrests of illegal immigrant workers are down 77 percent under Mr. Obama, criminal arrests are down 60 percent and convictions are down 68 percent.
"Worksite enforcement has been all but forgotten by the Obama administration," the Texas Republican said. "Millions of Americans are struggling to find work, while an estimated 7 million illegal immigrants are working in the U.S. Worksite enforcement could help make those much-needed jobs available for U.S. citizen and legal immigrant workers."
Meanwhile, immigrant rights groups said the government is still not doing enough to limit deportations.
*
THESE FIGURES ARE MORE THAN A DECADE OLD.
THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS NOW OPERATE IN MORE THAN 2,500
AMERICAN CITIES.
ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMAL HARRIS, NEARLY HALF
OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS!
FBI
DIRECTOR:
"The
violent MS-13 - or Mara Salvatrucha - street gang is following the migratory
routes of illegal aliens across the country, FBI officials say, calling the
Salvadoran gang the new American mafia. MS-13, has a significant presence in
the Washington area, and other gangs are spreading into small towns and suburbs
by following illegal aliens seeking work in places such as Providence, R.I.,
and the Carolinas, FBI task force director Robert Clifford said. "The
migrant moves and the gang follows," said Mr. Clifford, director of the
agency's MS-13 National Gang Task Force."
INS/FBI Statistical Report on Undocumented Immigrants 2006 (First
Quarter) INS/FBI
Statistical Report on Undocumented
Immigrants CRIME STATISTICS 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for
illegal aliens.
83% of warrants for murder in Phoenix are for
illegal aliens. 86% of warrants for murder in Albuquerque are for illegal
aliens.
75%
of those on the most wanted list in Los Angeles, Phoenix and Albuquerque are
illegal aliens.
24.9%
of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here
illegally 40.1% of all inmates in Arizona detention centers are Mexican
nationals here illegally 48.2% of all inmates in New Mexico detention centers
are Mexican nationals here illegally 29% (630,000) convicted illegal alien
felons fill our state and federal prisons at a cost of $1.6 billion annually
53% plus of all investigated burglaries reported in California, New Mexico,
Nevada, Arizona and Texas are perpetrated by illegal aliens. 50% plus of all
gang members in Los Angeles are illegal aliens from south of the border. 71%
plus of all apprehended cars stolen in 2005 in Texas, New Mexico, Arizona,
Nevada and California were stolen by Illegal aliens or “transport
coyotes". 47% of cited/stopped drivers in California have no license, no
insurance and no registration for the vehicle. Of that 47%, 92% are illegal
aliens. 63% of cited/stopped drivers in Arizona have no license, no insurance
and no registration for the vehicle. Of that 63%, 97% are illegal aliens 66% of
cited/stopped drivers in New Mexico have no license, no insurance and no
registration for the vehicle. Of that 66% 98% are illegal aliens. BIRTH
STATISTICS 380,000 plus “anchor babies” were born in the U.S. in 2005 to
illegal alien parents, making 380,000 babies automatically U.S.citizens. 97.2%
of all costs incurred from those births were paid by the American taxpayers.
66% plus of all births in California are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal
whose births were paid for by taxpayers
No comments:
Post a Comment