Thursday, October 11, 2012

The class issues in the 2012 US elections - DEMS ARE NOW THE PARTY of ILLEGALS

The class issues in the 2012 US elections

WE, AS A NATION HAVE WATCHED AS THE LA RAZA MEXICAN OCCUPATION HAS SPREAD FROM MEXIFORNIA TO ALL 50 STATES.

WITH THE LA RAZA INVASION COMES UNEMPLOYMENT FOR AMERICANS, ALONG WITH THE TAX BILLS TO SUPPORT THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS. LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PUTS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS.

AND THEN THERE IS THE MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE. HALF THE INMATES IN CA PRISONS ARE MEXICANS. ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GENERAL KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF THE MURDERS IN CA ARE NOW BY MEXICAN GANGS.

OF THE TOP 200 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN LOS ANGELES, 183 ARE MEXICANS, AND MOST OF THE REST ARE RUSSIANS.

....IT'S ALL ABOUT KEEPING WAGES DEPRESSED! THE MEX OCCUPATION DEPRESSES WAGES FROM $300-$400 BILLION PER  YEAR. EVEN EARING MISERABLE MINIMUM WAGES, A MEXICAN IS STILL RECEIVING 8XS HIGHER WAGES IN OUR BORDERS THAN IN MEXICO, WHERE THEY GET NO WELFARE, NO "FREE" MEDICAL, NO "FREE" EDUCATION. ETC.

A GOOD EXAMPLE OF THE CORRUPTION OF THE LA RAZA DEMS IS DOCUMENTED BY THE ACTS OF SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN, ONE OF THE MOST CORRUPT POLITICIANS IN AMERICAN HISTORY. FEINSTEIN-BOXER HAVE THREE (3) TIMES PUSHED FOR A SPECIAL AMNESTY FOR 1.5 MILLION "CHEAP" LABOR ILLEGAL FARM WORKERS FOR THEIR BIG AG BIZ DONORS TO EXPLOIT.!!!!!! DESPITE THE FACT THAT ONE-THIRD OF THESE "CHEAP" LABOR ILLEGALS END UP ON WELFARE!!!!!!

CA NOW PUTS OUT $22 BILLION PER YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS AND THE STATE LEGISLATURE IN SO CONTROLLED BY LA RAZA DEMS, OR LA RAZA MEXICANS THAT THEY PASS LAW AFTER LAW BENEFITING ILLEGALS.

SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN HAS LONG HIRED ILLEGALS AT HER S.F. HOTEL, ONLY MILES FROM HER $16 MILLION DOLLAR WAR PROFITEER'S MANSION. HER LA RAZA SISTER, NANCY PELOSI HIRES ILLEGALS AT HER NAPA WINERY..... it's all about keeping wages depressed!


OBAMA HAS PROMISED ILLEGALS NOT ONLY OUR JOBS, BUT BIT BY BIT BY BIT AMNESTY or at least CONTINUED  NON-ENFORCEMENT UNTIL THEY’RE VOTING IN ALL THEIR LA RAZA SUPREMACIST INTO ELECTED OFFICE.

 


 

MUCH OF OBAMA’S ADMINISTRATION ARE LA RAZA SUPREMACIST LIKE HILDA SOLIS AND CECELIA MUNOZ, JANET NAPOLITANO!

 

Lost in the media frenzy surrounding President Obama's decision to administratively implement the DREAM Act is the Administration's plans to also grant a reprieve to the illegal alien parents who brought them here in violation of U.S. immigration law. In doing so, the Administration is directly contradicting its own public relations campaign — and that of amnesty advocates nationwide — which has portrayed its new policy as a way to provide "a degree of relief" to "innocent young kids."

 

 

 

BOOK:

Mexifornia: SHATTERING OF AN AMERICAN DREAM (illegals call it their DREAM ACT)

 

http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/book-mexifornia-shattering-of-american.html

 

*

 

THESE FIGURES ON WELFARE FOR ILLEGALS IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY ARE DATED. IT NOW EXCEEDS $600 MILLION PER YEAR!!! (source: Los Angeles County & JUDICIAL

WATCH)

 

 

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949085/posts

 

 

 

IS IT TIME THE DEMS STOPPED LETTING THE VIRULENTLY RACIST  OCCUPATION

 

 

 

 

 

PARTY FOR MEXICAN SUPREMACY OF ….LA RAZA… “THE RACE” STOP DICTATING THEIR OPEN BORDERS = DEPRESSED WAGES = BIG CORPORATE CAMPAIGN DONATIONS = 38 MILLION ILLEGALS’ VOTES?

 

OR IS IT TIME THE DEMS STOPPED LETTING THE U.S. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, WHICH FRONTS FOR THE CORPORATE WALL STREET RAPIST DONORS OF LA RAZA STOP DICTATING THE DEMS’ OPEN BORDERS = DEPRESSED WAGES = BIG CORPORATE BRIBES???

 

OBAMA AND HIS HAREM OF CORRUPT LIFER-DEMS DON’T THINK SO.

 

OBAMA HAS ANOTHER CON JOB UP HIS SLEEVE! HE WILL QUIETLY AND SECRETLY KEEP THE STATUS QUO JUST AS IT IS ON THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION.

 

WHILE OBAMA FORCED G.M. INTO BANKRUPTCY TO RID ITSELF OF HAVING TO PAY GOOD WAGES TO ITS EMPLOYEES, JUST AS HE WAS LYING THROUGH HIS BIG TEETH ABOUT not BACKING BIG BONUSES TO THE BIG BANKERS THAT CAUSED THE BIG GLOBAL DEPRESSION.

 

HERE’S OBAMA’S SAME OL’, SAME OL’, BIT BY BIT BY BIT AMNESTY.

 

IT’S CALLED SAY ONE THING, AND SAY IT ELOQUENTLY LIKE A WALL STREET TRAINED ACTOR, THEN FUCK OVER THE PEOPLE FOR MORE ILLEGALS!

 

NO E-VERIFY

 

NO COMPLETION OF THE WALL

 

HISPANDERING LYING WHORE NAPOLITANO TO THE RESCUE

 

NO ICE WITH TEETH. JUST ICE WITH SILLY FORM LETTERS

 

NO ENFORCEMENT OF EXISTING LAWS PROHIBITING EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS

 

WHEN ACCOMPLISHED, JUST SEND THE STAGGERING B ILLS FOR ALL THIS “CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR AND THE CRIME WAVES THAT COME WITH THE MEXICAN OCCUPATION TO THE STUPID GRINGOS OF THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS, JUST LIKE HE SENT THE BILLS FOR THE BANKERS’ PILLAGE TO THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS…

 

THEN GO OUT AND COUNT THE ILLEGALS’ ILLEGAL VOTES!

 

VIVA MEXICO! VIVA WALL STREET! VIVA MEXCIO!

*

Lou Dobbs Tonight
Thursday, April 9, 2009

 Plus, outrage after President Obama prepares to push ahead with his plan for so-called comprehensive immigration reform. Pres. Obama is fulfilling a campaign promise to give
legal status to millions of illegal aliens as he panders to the pro-amnesty, open borders lobby. Tonight we will have complete coverage.
*

Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, February 16, 2009

Construction of the 670 miles of border fence mandated by the Bush administration is almost complete. The Border Patrol says the new fencing, more agents and new technology
have reduced illegal alien apprehensions. But fence opponents are trying to stop the last few miles from being finished. We will have a full report, tonight.


 Plus, even open border advocates agree that the most effective way of fighting illegal immigration is to crack down on the employment of illegal aliens. Yet, those same groups are
opposed to E-Verify, which has an initial accuracy rate of 99.6% making it one the most accurate programs ever. E-Verify was stripped from the stimulus bill but who stripped it out and who is opposed to verifying employment status is still not clear.

*

OBAMAsCONjobs

 

Go soft on criminal employers of illegals even when the REAL unemployment level is 20%! Then when the stupid gringos aren’t looking, return to the DEMS NO ENFORCMENT POLICY = ILLEGALS’ VOTES once again!

 

It’s been the DEMS’ FOR ILLEGALS = DEPRESSED WAGES = MUCHO BIG CAMPAIGN BRIBES FROM MUCHO LA RAZA DONOR CORPORATIONS for the last 20 years of BUSH, HILLARY, BILLARY, BUSH corporate rape and pillage. Or since the last phony “AMNESTY” of 1986

 

 

 

 

THE DEMS BIT BY BIT BY BIT AMNESTY CON JOB:

 

from the June 17, 2009 edition - http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/0617/p09s03-coop.html

 

Solution to immigration reform is in the details

The US can stop 'making do' with the broken status quo by not letting interest groups direct policy with grand concepts.

By Philip Martin and Michael S. Teitelbaum

 

New York

Immigration reform is highly contentious, yet politicians agree on one thing: The current US immigration policy is broken and the status quo does not serve the interests of most workers and employers, nor the broader national interest.

You might then ask, "If most agree that the status quo is broken, why not fix it?" There is a simple answer to this: Since advocates for either side can't get what they want, the current broken model works well enough.

THE CURRENT SYSTEM OF NO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGAINST HIRING ILLEGALS, BILLIONS IN WELFARE TO INDUCE EVEN MORE TO CLIMB OUR BORDERS, AND NO LEGAL NEED APPLY HERE POLICIES ARE WORKING JUST FINE! JUST VISIT MEXIFORNIA AND SEE!

Supporters of expanded immigration have tried but failed to increase legal immigration and to create paths to citizenship for most of the 11 to 12 million unauthorized. Since those options have not been attainable, the "broken" status quo is the next best option; it allows immigrant numbers to continue to grow, while giving millions of unauthorized migrants time to establish equities and roots in the US, including via US-born children.

Advocates for limits on immigration have also failed to achieve their goals. They want more effective enforcement in the workplace, but strongly oppose both increased legal immigration and another large-scale legalization. Hence for them, too, the broken status quo is the next best thing.

Meanwhile the two most interested groups – unauthorized migrants themselves and their employers – find the broken status quo satisfactory. It enables most unauthorized migrants to use false documents to circumvent the law and find US employment at higher wages than at home. It enables businesses to hire them at wage and benefit levels lower than the market would otherwise require. This minority of employers might prefer legal rather than falsely documented employees, but not if they cost more.

As President Obama prepares to initiate a national conversation on comprehensive immigration reform in the coming months, he should keep in mind that any hope for an effective solution lies in the details.

As with the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), the last "comprehensive" reform, current comprehensive proposals include three key components:

1. A plan to give legal status and a path to citizenship for most of the unauthorized;

2. A promise of more effective workplace enforcement via credible identification to limit employers' ability to hire unauthorized workers;

3. A way to deal with the future influx of migrant workers.

Each of the three elements is complex and contentious.

For legalization: How many of the estimated 11 to 12 million unauthorized should be legalized? How many should be granted US citizenship? Is the government able and willing to run such a program with both efficiency and credibility? What fees, proof of eligibility, and other requirements would be enforced?

For credible workplace identification: the tricky issues are cost, accuracy, penalties, liability, and privacy.

On the influx of migrant workers: the fracas centers on how much control employers get over temporary and permanent entries of low-wage workers.

The disputes over legalization and secure identification have not changed much since Congress stalemated on comprehensive immigration reform in 2006-07. On migrant workers, employer advocates know that the dismal job market makes it hard to pass the large temporary worker programs they want. Perhaps a commission – if employer advocates could shape its composition – could achieve the same thing administratively.

In the end what matters is not the concept, but the detail. One obvious example: What would prevent employer or other interest groups from finding ways to dominate a commission empowered to set numbers of migrant workers?

The United States immigration debate has been in a similar place before. It was the details that ensured that the comprehensive IRCA reforms of 1986 failed to reduce unauthorized migration.

In concept, IRCA prohibited the knowing employment of persons unlawfully in the US. But the perverse details imposed by some of the same interest groups active today invited the pervasive fraud that made this concept unenforceable. IRCA required employers to examine workers' documents but prohibited them from checking the documents' validity.

The key to successful comprehensive immigration reform is to ensure that the details support, rather than detract from, its goals.

Obama's administration can start by requiring that any legalization plan be evaluated by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) before it is implemented, to ensure that the government can legalize those eligible but prevent the widespread fraud that occurred under IRCA.

Washington also should require the GAO to certify that an effective workplace enforcement system has been implemented before legalization kicks in. And any truly independent commission would need safeguards against being dominated by the most interested interest groups.

Change is clearly needed, but as the president sets out to restart dialogue on immigration reform, he must not allow interest groups to push through another round of "comprehensive" reform that promises one result with grand concepts but whose details take us in another direction.

Not paying close attention to these critical details will only further exacerbate public cynicism and disenchantment. And that would leave us right where we started, with a still-broken policy.

Philip Martin, professor of agricultural economics at the University of California, Davis, was a member of the US Commission on Agricultural Workers. Michael S. Teitelbaum, a demographer, was a member and vice chair of the US Commission on Immigration Reform.

 

 

*

PAT BUCHANAN – WHOSE COUNTRY IS THIS?


OBAMA WOULD RESPOND: VIVA LA RAZA!

*

 

WE ARE MEXICO’S WELFARE, “FREE” BIRTHING CENTERS, JOBS & JAILS SYSTEMS… IT WORKS FOR THE RULING CLASS OF MEXICO, AND FOR WALL ST. HERE!

*

“Through love of having children, we are going to take over.”  AUGUSTIN CEBADA, BROWN BERETS, THE LA RAZA FASCIST PARTY

http://www.aztlan.net/anchor_baby_power.htm

 

 

*


http://video.yahoo.com/watch/7165215?fr=yvmtf

*

http://www.mexica-movement.org/ They claim all of North America for Mexico!

*

Lou Dobbs Tonight

Monday, February 11, 2008

In California, League of United Latin American Citizens has adopted a resolution to declare "California Del Norte" a sanctuary zone for immigrants. The declaration urges the Mexican government to invoke its rights under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo "to seek third‑nation neutral arbitration of disputes concerning immigration laws and their enforcement." We’ll have the story.

*

 

FAIRUS.org

The Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy

According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department.

By Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com

The setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a “Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over illegal immigration and announced that the Obama administration is ready to move forward with a mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already living in the United States.

Arguing the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”

Acknowledging that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.

“For starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight, she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”

If Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.

According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894 miles of border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with protecting. As for the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for FY 2010 is the same 894 miles.

The administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data, released November 18, show that administrative arrests of immigration law violators fell by 68 percent between 2008 and 2009. The department also carried out 60 percent fewer arrests for criminal violations of immigration laws, 58 percent fewer criminal indictments, and won 63 percent fewer convictions.

While the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers willing to accept substandard wages.

In Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under “effective control” and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything, the administration’s record has left the public less confident that promises of future immigration enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re printed on.

As Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy, they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all but sawed off. The second – increased admissions of extended family members and workers – makes little sense with some 25 million Americans either unemployed or relegated to part-time work. And the third – amnesty for millions of illegal aliens – is anathema to their sense of justice and fair play.

As Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this administration is “Mission Aborted.”

*

WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA'S AGENDA OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND AN ILLEGAL IN EVERY AMERICAN JOB TO KEEP WAGES DEPRESSED. THE LEGALS GET THE TAX BILLS FOR THE MEX WELFARE AND CRIME TIDAL WAVE.
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2012/05/illegals-obama-promises-his-la-raza.html

*



The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal workers.


*

Obama Quietly Erasing Borders (Article)

 

 


*

 

Illegal Alien Parents to Benefit from President's DREAM Act Decree


 


Lost in the media frenzy surrounding President Obama's decision to administratively implement the DREAM Act is the Administration's plans to also grant a reprieve to the illegal alien parents who brought them here in violation of U.S. immigration law. In doing so, the Administration is directly contradicting its own public relations campaign — and that of amnesty advocates nationwide — which has portrayed its new policy as a way to provide "a degree of relief" to "innocent young kids." (See White House transcript, June 15, 2012; to read more about the President's "deferred action" policy, see FAIR's Legislative Update, June 19, 2012)

The Administration's decision to not deport the illegal alien parents of so-called DREAMers was revealed by Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano during a CNN interview. Here is the exchange between CNN Anchorman Wolf Blitzer and Secretary Napolitano:

BLITZER: What about the parents of these children? The children come forward now, they identify themselves. Should the parents be concerned that potentially they could be deported? They would now be identified as illegal immigrants.

NAPOLITANO: No. We are not going to do that. We have internally set it up so that the parents are not referred for immigration enforcement if the young person comes in for deferred action. However, the parents are not qualified for deferred action. This is for the young people who meet the criteria that we've set forth. (CNN transcript, June 15, 2012)

While Napolitano makes the distinction that the illegal alien parents will not qualify for "deferred action," the Administration's decision not to deport them essentially amounts to the same thing. The only major difference is that if the Department of Homeland Security simply administratively closes the parents' cases, it is uncertain whether it will grant the parents work authorization.

As if the President's new deferred action policy were not troubling enough itself, the decision not to deport the illegal alien parents of DREAMers could triple the number of illegal aliens who benefit from it. Excluding parents, the Pew Hispanic Center estimates that at least 1.4 million illegal aliens would qualify for deferred action under the President's new program. (See Pew Hispanic Center report, June 15, 2012) But with the Administration's acknowledgment that it will no longer deport the illegal alien parents of DREAMers, the size of the President's amnesty program could triple, or perhaps even quadruple, when fraudulent applications are taken into account.

 

OBAMA HAS ALWAYS PROMISED ILLEGALS AMNESTY…. OR CONTINUED NON-ENFORCEMENT! NOW THERE ARE ENOUGH ILLEGALS IN OUR BORDERS VOTING THAT THEY ARE FILLING ELECTED OFFICES WITH LA RAZA SUPREMACIST IN ALL 50 STATES!

 

 

CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR

 

Obama urges Congress not to put off immigration reform

But lawmakers are in no rush to tackle a controversial issue that has broad economic and social implications.

By By Gail Russell Chaddock  |  Staff writer/ June 25, 2009 edition

Washington

President Obama Thursday called for some “heavy lifting” on immigration reform on Capitol Hill, but there’s no move there to rush into it.

With energy, healthcare, and financial regulation on a fast track, there’s little running room for an issue that has baffled lawmakers for the past three years. But for president and a critical mass of interest groups heavily invested in comprehensive reform, even a symbolic stake in the ground is a start.

“The consensus is that despite our inability to get this passed over the last several years, the American people still want to see a solution,” Mr. Obama said after a bipartisan meeting with House and Senate members.

“We’ve got a responsible set of leaders sitting around the table who want to actively get something done and not put it off until a year, two years, three years, five years from now, but to start working on this thing now,” he said.

PELOSI , LIKE FEINSTEIN, HAS LONG ILLEGALLY HIRED ILLEGALS. SHE USES “CHEAP” MEXICAN LABOR FOR HER $20 MILLION ST. HELENA, NAPA WINERY. FEINSTEIN AT HER S.F. HOTEL!

PELOSI HAS LONG VOWED TO SABOTAGE AMERICAN’S SECURITY ON BEHALF OF ILLEGALS AND THE MEXICAN INVASION AND OCCUPATION. SHE HAS VOWED TOTAL AMNESTY, CHAIN MIGRATION, WHICH COULD DOUBLE THE 38 MILLION ILLEGALS HERE, NO WALL, NO E-VERIFY, NO ICE ENFORCEMENT, NO ENFORCEMENT OF EXISTING LAWS MAKING IT ILLEGAL TO HIRE ILLEGALS, AS WELL AS NO ENGLISH ONLY (MEXICANS HATE TO SPEAK ENGLISH) AND NO ID T VOTE FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF ILLEGALS VOTING FOR HISPANDERING POLITICIANS, LIKE BARACK OBAMA!

Pressed on the issue at a briefing today, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said that “the plan has always been for the Senate to go first.”

The Senate passed immigration reform in 2006, but efforts bogged down in 2007 and 2008. House Democrats, who all face voters every two years, want to be assured that a plan can pass the Senate, before taking what is for many a tough vote.

White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel said at a Monitor Breakfast Thursday that one of the reasons the president called a meeting with lawmakers is to keep a focus on the issue because there isn’t yet a majority to pass comprehensive legislation.

“The Congressional Hispanic Caucus and immigration groups have all asked for a meeting because the votes aren’t there,” he said. “If the votes were there, you wouldn’t need to have the meeting, you’d go to a roll call.”

“If it doesn’t happen in the next two months, I don’t think that that means that it doesn’t happen between now and 2010,” he added.

But the administration isn’t waiting on Congress to take steps to ease barriers to legal immigration.

For the foreign nationals lined up for news about their citizenship applications, the process is about to get easier. Within the next 90 days, those updates will be coming by e-mail, text message, or online, the president announced at today’s immigration summit.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has also cleared up much of the backlog of immigration background checks, and the famously opaque US Citizenship and Immigration Services Office will soon be “much more efficient, much more transparent, much more user-friendly than it has been in the past,” Obama added.

“My administration is fully behind an effort to achieve comprehensive immigration reform,” he said.

HISPANDERING FOR THE ILLEGALS’ ILLEGAL VOTES AND TO SERVICE EMPLOYERS OF ILLEGALS. 47% OF THOSE EMPLOYED IN LOS ANGELES ARE ILLEGALS WITH STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS. THAT CITY PAYS OUT $40 MILLION, YES MILLION PER MONTH IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS!

DON’T BUY THE CRAP BELOW. THEY’RE ONLY PULLING THE SAME THING THEY DID IN 1986. THERE EXIST LAWS TO PROTECT AMERICAN FROM BECOMING MEXICO’S WELFARE STATE, AND NOT ONE IS ENFORCED. IT’S ALL CON JOB TO SELL US ON HANDING OVER MORE OF THE NATION TO NARCOMEX, FOR “CHEAP” LABOR THE AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS ENDS UP PAYING FOR!

That reform agenda, as outlined in today’s meeting, includes: tightening borders, cracking down on employers who use illegal workers in order to drive down wages, and a path to legal status for the “undocumented workers who are here.”

Conspicuous for its absence is emphasis on an expanded guest-worker program – a top priority for some US businesses and a fixture in the last immigration-reform drive.

“The White House meeting today is intended as political theater – a bone being thrown to the pro-amnesty groups to demonstrate the White House’s commitment to amnesty, even though they don’t have the votes to pass it,” says Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, which promotes stricter controls on immigration.

 

No comments: