FROSTY WOOLDRIDGE
We take in over a total of
1.2 million legal immigrants annually more that all other nations combined.
They birth another 900,000 babies annually in the USA. Then, we have 800,000
illegals still pouring over our borders annually.
Subject: Name one
advantage of adding another 100 million immigrants
Dear fellow
Americans:
In the past two
months, I completed my 8th bicycle ride across America. I discovered that most
Americans cannot be bothered and are not involved or concerned with mass
immigration. They just don’t know it’s flooding the country with an armada of
humanity. They don’t understand that it’s overwhelming our water, energy,
resources and environment. They think our Congress is taking care of it. They
think the president is taking care of it. They would be horrifically wrong.
Those folks are accelerating it. Last night on NBC’s Brian Williams, he talked
about Asians flooding into the USA at ever increasing numbers. Fareed Zakaria,
an Indian immigrant, wrote a big piece in this week’s Time Magazine chastising
us for not welcoming even more immigrants. (“Broken and Obsolete: An
immigration deadlock makes the US a second-rate nation”, June 18, 2012, page
24) We take in over a total of 1.2
million legal immigrants annually more that all other nations combined. They
birth another 900,000 babies annually in the USA. Then, we have 800,000
illegals still pouring over our borders annually. That’s three million
added annually that constitutes a human armada that continues to swamp this
nation and will ultimately add another 100 million immigrants by 2050—a scant
38 years from now. We are already at 315 million and will hit 438 million by
2050. (Source: PEW Center Report, Fogel/Martin “US Population Projections”) But
no one will address that degraded future. They suppress the discussion at all
costs. We are a nation of apathetic fools and idiot leaders. We face tremendous
water shortages, energy crisis, resource scarcities and food shortages, but we
keep adding sheer numbers from other countries that are already where we are
headed. Beats the daylights out of me how we could be so friggin’ stupid on so
many levels. This
population nightmare will not stop unless we collectively vote the Congress out
of business and replace this president. Name one advantage of adding another 100 million people to
this country? Will it clear our air, lower our gridlocked traffic, stop species
extinction, raise our quality of life in our cities, raise our standard of
living and bring us more food, cheaper energy and more resources? Answer: not a
chance. Frosty Wooldridge
Re: “Not
legal/not leaving” Nation, Vargas, 6/24. The story of 12 million illegal border
crossers into the US that defiantly refuse to obey the laws of the sovereign
nation of the USA.
If given the
chance, over three billion people would love to immigrate to America to taste
our freedom, standard of living and personal choices. We import over 1.2
million legally annually, more than all other countries combined. The greater
question must be asked: how many legal and illegal migrants can we absorb
before we become an ecologically, socially and overwhelmed disaster area such
as what they fled? The developing world births another 80 million new desperate
people annually. The line never ends. The PEW Hispanic Center reported that
America will import 100 million immigrants within the next 38 years by 2050.
How do we expect to water, feed, house, warm, provide jobs, educate, maintain
our environment, quality of life and standard of living with this advancing
armada of humanity? Answer: we will degrade our civilization until it cannot be
sustained and ultimately collapse.
Golden, CO 80401
An
argument to be made about immigrant babies and citizenship
GEORGE
F. WILL
Sunday, March 28, 2010; A15
A
simple reform would drain some scalding steam from immigration arguments that
may soon again be at a roiling boil. It would bring the interpretation
of the 14th Amendment
into conformity with what the authors of its text intended, and with common
sense, thereby removing an incentive for illegal immigration.
To end
the practice of "birthright citizenship," all that is required is to
correct the misinterpretation of that amendment's first sentence: "All
persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state
wherein they reside." From these words has flowed the practice of
conferring citizenship on children born here to illegal immigrants.
A
parent from a poor country, writes professor Lino Graglia of the University of
Texas law school, "can hardly do more for a child than make him or her an
American citizen, entitled to all the advantages of the American welfare
state." Therefore, "It is difficult to imagine a more irrational and
self-defeating legal system than one which makes unauthorized entry into this
country a criminal offense and simultaneously provides perhaps the greatest
possible inducement to illegal entry."
Writing in the
Texas Review of Law and Politics, Graglia says this irrationality is rooted in a misunderstanding of
the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof." What was this
intended or understood to mean by those who wrote it in 1866 and ratified it in
1868? The authors and ratifiers could not have intended birthright citizenship
for illegal immigrants because in 1868 there were and never had been any
illegal immigrants because no law ever had restricted immigration.
If
those who wrote and ratified the 14th Amendment had imagined laws restricting
immigration -- and had anticipated huge waves of illegal immigration -- is it
reasonable to presume they would have wanted to provide the reward of
citizenship to the children of the violators of those laws? Surely not.
The
Civil Rights Act
of 1866
begins with language from which the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause is
derived: "All persons born in the United States, and not subject to any
foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be
citizens of the United States." (Emphasis added.) The explicit exclusion
of Indians from birthright citizenship was not repeated in the 14th Amendment
because it was considered unnecessary. Although Indians were at least partially
subject to U.S. jurisdiction, they owed allegiance to their tribes, not the
United States. This reasoning -- divided allegiance -- applies equally to
exclude the children of resident aliens, legal as well as illegal, from
birthright citizenship. Indeed, today's regulations issued by the departments
of Homeland Security and Justice stipulate:
"A
person born in the United States to a foreign diplomatic officer accredited to
the United States, as a matter of international law, is not subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States. That person is not a United States citizen
under the 14th Amendment."
Sen. Lyman
Trumbull of Illinois
was, Graglia writes, one of two "principal authors of the citizenship
clauses in 1866 act and the 14th Amendment." He said that "subject to
the jurisdiction of the United States" meant subject to its
"complete" jurisdiction, meaning "not owing allegiance to
anybody else." Hence children whose Indian parents had tribal allegiances
were excluded from birthright citizenship.
Appropriately,
in 1884 the Supreme Court held that children born to Indian parents were not
born "subject to" U.S. jurisdiction because, among other reasons, the
person so born could not change his status by his "own will without the
action or assent of the United States." And "no one can become a
citizen of a nation without its consent." Graglia says this decision
"seemed to establish" that U.S. citizenship is "a consensual
relation, requiring the consent of the United States." So: "This
would clearly settle the question of birthright citizenship for children of
illegal aliens. There cannot be a more total or forceful denial of consent to a
person's citizenship than to make the source of that person's presence in the
nation illegal."
Congress has
heard testimony estimating that more than two-thirds of all births in Los
Angeles public hospitals, and more than half of all births in that city, and
nearly 10 percent of all births in the nation in recent years, have been to
mothers who are here illegally. Graglia seems to establish that there is no constitutional
impediment to Congress ending the granting of birthright citizenship to those
whose presence here is "not only without the government's consent but in
violation of its law."
WILL MEXICO BANKRUPT
AMERICA?
NOT ONE LEGAL VOTED TO
BE LOOTED BY MEXICO OR TO PAY FOR THE MEXICAN WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS.
ISN’T IT BAD ENOUGH
WE’RE FORCED TO HAND ILLEGALS USING STOLEN SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS OUR JOBS?
Obama DREAM Amnesty to Cost At Least $585 Million
The Obama Administration's plan to grant deferred action
status and work authorization to illegal aliens meeting criteria similar to the
DREAM Act could cost over $585 million, internal Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) documents reveal. (Arizona Central, July 24, 2012)
The documents, leaked to the Associated
Press last week, provide the first look at the Administration's cost
projections for the amnesty program announced June 15. They include estimates
that the federal government will need to hire over 1,400 new employees and
contractors to process the more than one million anticipated applications.
(Id.) In fact, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) — the agency
that the Inspector General discovered earlier this year was pressuring its
employees into rubber-stamping immigration benefits applications despite
questions of fraud or ineligibility — estimates the amnesty will result in it
processing more than 3,000 applications daily. (Id.; see also FAIR
Legislative Update, Jan. 9, 2012 and OIG Report
12-24)
The documents also undermine the Administration's claims
that the amnesty will be fee-driven and not cost U.S. taxpayers. While the
internal documents show DHS is considering charging illegal aliens $465 per
application, the documents also state that depending on how many applicants are
granted a waiver or otherwise do not pay, the government could lose between $19
million and $121 million. (Arizona Central, July 24, 2012)Secretary Napolitano told
Congress last week that DHS would release its plans for implementing the
application process August 1 and that it would begin accepting applications
August 15. (See Bloomberg Government Transcript, July 19, 2012; see
also FAIR
Legislative Update, July 23) The Department was scheduled to hold
its second stakeholder conference call on the recently announced deferred
action program July 26 (already rescheduled from July 9), but cancelled the
call just hours before it was to occur.
*
“We should not forget that we are a nation of laws and a
nation of immigrants,” Napolitano said.
*
The Obama administration has also
cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to
continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal workers.
Illegal Alien Parents to Benefit from President's DREAM Act Decree
Lost in the media frenzy
surrounding President Obama's decision to administratively implement the DREAM
Act is the Administration's plans to also grant a reprieve to the illegal alien
parents who brought them here in violation of U.S. immigration law. In doing
so, the Administration is directly contradicting its own public relations
campaign — and that of amnesty advocates nationwide — which has portrayed its
new policy as a way to provide "a degree of relief" to "innocent
young kids." (See White House transcript, June 15, 2012; to read more about the President's
"deferred action" policy, see FAIR's Legislative
Update, June 19, 2012)
The Administration's decision to
not deport the illegal alien parents of so-called DREAMers was revealed by
Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano during a CNN interview. Here is
the exchange between CNN Anchorman Wolf Blitzer and Secretary Napolitano:
BLITZER: What
about the parents of these children? The children come forward now, they
identify themselves. Should the parents be concerned that potentially they
could be deported? They would now be identified as illegal immigrants.
NAPOLITANO: No.
We are not going to do that. We have internally set it up so that the parents
are not referred for immigration enforcement if the young person comes in for
deferred action. However, the parents are not qualified for deferred action.
This is for the young people who meet the criteria that we've set forth. (CNN transcript, June 15, 2012)
While Napolitano makes the
distinction that the illegal alien parents will not qualify for "deferred
action," the Administration's decision not to deport them essentially
amounts to the same thing. The only major difference is that if the Department
of Homeland Security simply administratively closes the parents' cases, it is
uncertain whether it will grant the parents work authorization.
As if the President's new deferred
action policy were not troubling enough itself, the decision not to deport the
illegal alien parents of DREAMers could triple the number of illegal aliens who
benefit from it. Excluding parents, the Pew Hispanic Center estimates that at
least 1.4 million illegal aliens would qualify for deferred action under the
President's new program. (See Pew Hispanic Center report, June 15, 2012) But with the Administration's
acknowledgment that it will no longer deport the illegal alien parents of
DREAMers, the size of the President's amnesty program could triple, or perhaps
even quadruple, when fraudulent applications are taken into account.
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming
the jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of
Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama
is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president
should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs
they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."
*
Newsmax
Obama's 'Hispanicazation' of America
Monday, January 10, 2011 08:28 AM
The truth about the DREAM Act
Published March 20, 2012
The DREAM Act has become a rallying cry for President Obama,
members of his administration, and liberal Democrats everywhere. President
Obama has vowed to “keep fighting for the DREAM Act,” which would grant amnesty
to millions of illegal immigrants.
It’s true when listeners or those polled don’t know the facts that the
DREAM Act has some appeal. After all, we are all naturally sympathetic when
children are involved.
THE MEXICAN CRIME TIDAL WAVE
SPREADS ACROSS THE UNITED STATES
Everyday there are 12 Americans murdered by Mexicans and 8
children molested!
California Attorney Gen Kamala Harris announced that nearly
HALF of all murders in Mex-occupied CA are by MEX GANGS!
*
WILL MEXICO BANKRUPT AMERICA?
CALIFORNIA UNDER MEXICAN-OCCUPATION PAYS OUT $22 BILLION PER
YEAR IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS!
*
WILL OHIO BE BANKRUPTED BY THE LA RAZA MEX-OCCUPATION THAT
NOT ONE LEGAL VOTED FOR?
*
HOW MANY BILLIONS ARE MARYLANDERS FORCED TO PAY FOR MEX
WELFARE AND LOOTING?
*
BARACK OBAMA, FIRST HISPANDERING LA RAZA “THE RACE”
PRESIDENT – HIS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST INFESTED ADMINISTRATION:
*
OBAMA AND MEXICO PROMISE ILLEGALS JUMPING OUR BORDERS
OBAMACARE, “FREE” MEDICAL, “FREE” ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING = 18 YEARS WELFARE, AND
OUR JOBS!
*
ROBERT RECTOR: THE STAGGERING COST OF MEXICO’S INVASION,
OCCUPATION AND EVER GROWING WELFARE STATE
*
ONE OF MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORTS NEXT TO DRUGS, AND CRIMINALS
ARE PREGNANT WOMEN. THESE POOR DESPERATE WOMEN JUMP OUR BORDERS FOR “FREE”
ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE FOR EACH CHILD.
THE CHILDREN BORN OF MEXICANS THAT ILLEGALLY CROSSED OUR
BORDERS IS AN AMERICAN CITIZEN BUT STILL A CITIZEN OF MEXICO.
*
THE LOOTING OF AMERICA BY MEXICO, BARACK OBAMA and ERIC
HOLDER
OBAMA’S HISPANICAZATION of AMERICA:
*
ANCHOR BABIES – HOW MEXICO ANCHORS THEIR OCCUPATION AND
EXPAND THEIR WELFARE STATE IN OUR BORDERS!
*
Only in America could critics of a group called
"The Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing
identity chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have
succeeded in redefining all opposition as "hate."
Both Barack Obama and John McCain will speak this
week in San Diego at the annual conference of the National Council of La Raza,
the Latino organization whose name is Spanish for, yes, "The Race."
Can you imagine Obama and McCain paying homage to a group of white people who
called themselves that? No matter. The presidential candidates and the media
have legitimized "The Race" as a mainstream ethnic lobbying group and
marginalized its critics as intolerant bigots. The unvarnished truth is that
the group is a radical ethnic nationalist outfit that abuses your tax dollars
and milks PC politics to undermine our sovereignty.
14."The Race" demands in-state tuition
discounts for illegal alien students that are not available to law-abiding U.S.
citizens and law-abiding legal immigrants.
13. "The Race" vehemently opposes
cooperative immigration enforcement efforts between local, state and federal
authorities.
11. "The Race" joined the American-Arab
Anti-Discrimination Committee in a failed lawsuit attempt to prevent the feds
from entering immigration information into a key national crime database -- and
to prevent local police officers from accessing the data.
10. "The Race" opposed the state of
Oklahoma's tough immigration-enforcement-first laws, which cut off welfare to
illegal aliens, put teeth in employer sanctions and strengthened local-federal
cooperation and information sharing.
9. "The Race" joined other open-borders,
anti-assimilationists and sued to prevent Proposition 227, California's
bilingual education reform ballot initiative, from becoming law.
6. Former "Race" president Raul
Yzaguirre, Hillary Clinton's Hispanic outreach adviser, said this: "U.S.
English is to Hispanics as the Ku Klux Klan is to blacks." He was
referring to U.S. English, the nation's oldest, largest citizens' action group
dedicated to preserving the unifying role of the English language in the United
States. "The Race" also pioneered Orwellian open-borders Newspeak and
advised the Mexican government on how to lobby for illegal alien amnesty while
avoiding the terms "illegal" and "amnesty."
5. "The Race" gives mainstream cover to a
poisonous subset of ideological satellites, led by Movimiento Estudiantil
Chicano de Aztlan, or Chicano Student Movement of Aztlan (MEChA). The late GOP
Rep. Charlie Norwood rightly characterized the organization as "a radical
racist group … one of the most anti-American groups in the country, which has
permeated U.S. campuses since the 1960s, and continues its push to carve a
racist nation out of the American West."
4. "The Race" is currently leading a
smear campaign against staunch immigration enforcement leaders and has called
for TV and cable news networks to keep immigration enforcement proponents off
the airwaves -- in addition to pushing for Fairness Doctrine policies to shut
up their foes. The New York Times reported that current "Race"
president Janet Murguia believes "hate speech" should "not be
tolerated, even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment
rights."
3. "The Race" sponsors militant ethnic
nationalist charter schools subsidized by your public tax dollars (at least $8
million in federal education grants). The schools include Aztlan Academy in
Tucson, Ariz., the Mexicayotl Academy in Nogales, Ariz., Academia Cesar Chavez
Charter School in St. Paul, Minn., and La Academia Semillas del Pueblo in Los
Angeles, whose principal inveighed: "We don't want to drink from a White
water fountain, we have our own wells and our natural reservoirs and our way of
collecting rain in our aqueducts. We don't need a White water fountain …
ultimately the White way, the American way, the neo liberal, capitalist way of
life will eventually lead to our own destruction."
2. "The Race" has perfected the art of
the PC shakedown at taxpayer expense, pushing relentlessly to lower home loan
standards for Hispanic borrowers, reaping millions in federal "mortgage
counseling" grants, seeking special multimillion-dollar earmarks and
partnering with banks that do business with illegal aliens.
1. "The Race" thrives on ethnic supremacy
-- and the elite sheeple's unwillingness to call it what it is. As historian
Victor Davis Hanson observes: "[The] organization's very nomenclature 'The
National Council of La Raza' is hate speech to the core. Despite all the
contortions of the group, Raza (as its Latin cognate suggests) reflects the
meaning of 'race' in Spanish, not 'the people'-- and that's precisely why we
don't hear of something like 'The National Council of the People,' which would
not confer the buzz notion of ethnic, racial and tribal chauvinism."
No comments:
Post a Comment