IOWA, MICHIGAN,
NEBRASKA and ARIZONA SEE WHAT LA RAZA SUPREMACY HAS DONE TO MEX-OCCUPIED CA!
In a sign of growing opposition to President Obama's
immigration policy, Iowa has become the latest state to deny driver's licenses
to young illegal immigrants who receive deferments from deportation.
Iowa joins Michigan, Nebraska and Arizona in denying licenses
or non-operator identification cards because, officials say, Obama's deferred
action program doesn't grant legal status in the United States. Officials in
each state cite laws restricting the licenses to foreigners who reside here
legally.
New Immigration Battle: Driver's Licenses
by Corey Dade
December 28, 2012 6:50 PM
In a sign of
growing opposition to President Obama's immigration policy, Iowa has become the
latest state to deny driver's licenses to young illegal immigrants who receive
deferments from deportation.
Iowa joins Michigan, Nebraska and Arizona in denying licenses
or non-operator identification cards because, officials say, Obama's deferred
action program doesn't grant legal status in the United States. Officials in
each state cite laws restricting the licenses to foreigners who reside here
legally.
The program, which began in August, offers a renewable
two-year reprieve for qualified young people who were brought to the United
States as children. Recipients also gain permission to work here legally. So
far, more than 355,000 applicants have been accepted and nearly 103,000 have
been approved, according to the latest government figures.
Iowa's Department of Transportation Director Paul Trombino
III said in a statement:
"The Iowa DOT understands the exercising of this
prosecutorial discretion by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security does not
grant lawful status or a lawful immigration path to persons granted Deferred
Action for Childhood Arrivals status. Rather, it is prosecutorial discretion
extended in a blanket fashion to persons who are not lawfully authorized to be
present in the United States."
Republicans have criticized the program as backdoor amnesty
designed to boost Latino support for Obama. The four states denying licenses
are led by Republican governors. One of them, Nebraska's Dave Heineman, has
pledged to deny not only licenses, but welfare benefits and other services to
illegal immigrants, unless required by state law.
Washington and New Mexico are among states that issue
driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, although New Mexico Gov. Susana
Martinez, who is a Republican, wants her state's enabling law repealed.
Illinois could be next to issue licenses after the state Senate recently
approved a bill.
At issue is whether the federal program's authorization to
stay and work here legally also confers temporary legalized status.
Iowa officials cite the memorandum issued by Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano that outlines the new policy: "This
memorandum confers no substantive right, immigration status or pathway to
citizenship."
Immigrant advocates say people in deferred action status
qualify for licenses under the 2005 Real ID Act, which they have used to file
lawsuits to overturn the bans in Arizona and Michigan.
The Real ID law, an anti-terrorism measure aimed at creating
a national driver's license system, lists people in deferred action status
among the authorized noncitizens who are eligible to obtain a temporary
license.
Immigrant advocates also say the states are encroaching on
the federal government's authority to set immigration policy, a separation
reinforced by the Supreme Court ruling this year that severely weakened
Arizona's immigration enforcement law.
"Deferred action has existed for decades and decades.
It is a form of lawful presence, just like other forms of administrative relief
under our immigration laws," says Thomas Saenz, president and general
counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, which is
one of the groups suing in Arizona.
"There's really no legal or constitutional support for
what these states are doing," says Saenz. "Suggesting that they are
not here lawfully is a rhetorical political move that a number of these states
are engaging in.
GROWING NUMBER of “SANCTUARY” CITIES
WHERE ILLEGALS NOT ONLY GET ALL THE JOBS, WELFARE, BUT ALSO LA RAZA SUPREMACY!
THERE ARE NOW 40 MILLION ILLEGAL MEXICANS IN OUR COUNTRY AND
THEY ARE BREEDING LIKE CATHOLIC BUNNIES.
THEY’RE ALSO VOTING FOR LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND EXPANSION OF
THE MEX WELFARE STATE IN AMERICA!
Title: MOVING TO MEXICO
Read this
today. Thought I'd share it with you. I'm sure pyrostevo won't mind, since he
probably didn't make it up either.
Moving to Mexico
Moving to Mexico
Dear Mr. President, Senate and House of Representatives:
I'm planning to move my family and extended family (18-20 mouths) into Mexico for my health, and I would like to ask you to assist me.
We're planning to simply walk across the border from the U.S. into Mexico , and we'll need your help to make a few arrangements.
We plan to skip all the legal stuff like visas, passports, immigration quotas and laws. I'm sure they handle those things the same way you do here.
So, would you mind telling your buddy, President Calderon, that I'm on my way over? Please let him know that I will be expecting the following:
1. Free medical care for my entire family.
2. English-speaking government bureaucrats for all services I might need, whether I use them or not.
3. All Mexico government forms need to also be printed in English.
4. I want my kids to be taught Spanish by English-speaking (bi-lingual) teachers.
5. Schools need to include classes on American culture and history.
6. I want my kids to see the American flag on one of the flag poles at their school.
7. Please plan to feed my kids at school for both breakfast and lunch.
8. I will need a local Mexican driver's license so I can get easy access to government services.
9. I do plan to get a car and drive in Mexico, but, I don't plan to purchase car insurance, and I probably won't make any special effort to learn local traffic laws.
10. In case one of the Mexican police officers does not get the memo from their president to leave me alone, please be sure that every patrol car has at least one English-speaking officer.
11. I plan to fly the U.S. flag from my house top, put U S. flag decals on my car, and have a gigantic celebration on July 4th. I do not want any complaints or negative comments from the locals.
12. I would also like to have a nice job without paying any taxes, or have any labor or tax laws enforced on any business I may start.
13. Please have the president tell all the Mexican people to be extremely nice and never say a critical things about me or my family, or about the strain we might place on their economy.
I know this is an easy request because you already do all these things for all his people who come to the U.S. from Mexico .
I am sure that President Calderon won't mind returning the favor if you ask him nicely.
Thank you so much for your kind help,
Sincerely, US Citizen & Taxpayer
Pyro.... PRICELESS.
*
AMERICA – POSTED! NO LEGAL NEED
APPLY! BUT WE STILL GET THE BILLS FOR THE LA RAZA WELFARE AND CRIME STATE IN
OUR BORDERS!
If job creation is the goal, make E-Verify mandatory - TheHill.com
WHY MEXICO INVADED CALIFORNIA: THE LOOTING OF AN AMERICAN STATE BY INVITATION of the DEMOCRAT PARTY
L.A.County's $48 Million Monthly Anchor Baby
Tab
Last
Updated: Wed, 08/12/2009 - 11:24am
Taxpayers
in the nation’s most populous county dished out nearly $50 million in a single
month to cover only the welfare costs of illegal immigrants, representing a
whopping $10 million increase over the same one-month period two years
ago.
In
June 2009 alone Los Angeles County spent $48 million ($26 million in food
stamps and $22 million in welfare) to provide just two of numerous free public
services to the children of illegal aliens, which will translate into an annual
tab of nearly $600 million for the cash-strapped county.
The
figure doesn’t even include the exorbitant cost of educating, medically
treating or incarcerating illegal aliens in the sprawling county of about 10
million residents. Los Angeles County annually spends more than $1 billion for
those combined services, including $400 million for healthcare and $350 million
for public safety.
The
recent single-month welfare figure was obtained from the county’s Department of
Social Services and made public by a county supervisor (Michael Antonovich) who
assures illegal immigration continues to have a “catastrophic
impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers.” The veteran lawmaker points out that 24% of the county’s
total allotment of welfare and food stamp benefits goes directly to the
children of illegal aliens—known as anchor babies—born in the United States.
A
former fifth-grade history teacher who has served on the county’s board for
nearly three decades, Antonovich has repeatedly come under fire for publicizing
statistics that confirm the devastation illegal immigration has had on the
region. Antonovich represents a portion of the county that is roughly twice the
size of Rhode Island and has about 2 million residents.
Numerous other reports have
documented the enormous cost of illegal immigration on a national level. Just
last year a renowned economist, who has thoroughly researched the impact of
illegal immigration, published a book breaking down the country’s $346 billion annual
cost to educate, jail, medically treat and incarcerate illegal aliens
throughout the U.S.
*
WELFARE COSTS FOR CHILDREN
OF ILLEGAL ALIENS IN L.A. COUNTY OVER $48 MILLION IN JUNE
August 11, 2009—Figures from the
Department of Public Social Services show that children of illegal aliens in
Los Angeles County collected nearly $22 million in welfare and over $26 million
in food stamps in June, announced Los Angeles County Supervisor Michael D.
Antonovich. Projected over a 12 month period – this would exceed $575
million dollars.
Annually the cost of illegal immigration to Los Angeles County taxpayers exceeds over $1 billion dollars, which includes $350 million for public safety, $400 million for healthcare, and $500 million in welfare and food stamps allocations. Twenty-four percent of the County’s total allotment of welfare and food stamp benefits goes directly to the children of illegal aliens born in the United States.
“Illegal immigration continues to have a catastrophic impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers,” said Antonovich. “The total cost for illegal immigrants to County taxpayers exceeds $1 billion a year – not including the millions of dollars for education.”
Annually the cost of illegal immigration to Los Angeles County taxpayers exceeds over $1 billion dollars, which includes $350 million for public safety, $400 million for healthcare, and $500 million in welfare and food stamps allocations. Twenty-four percent of the County’s total allotment of welfare and food stamp benefits goes directly to the children of illegal aliens born in the United States.
“Illegal immigration continues to have a catastrophic impact on Los Angeles County taxpayers,” said Antonovich. “The total cost for illegal immigrants to County taxpayers exceeds $1 billion a year – not including the millions of dollars for education.”
*
ADD TO THESE FIGURES THE STAGGERING COST OF THE MEXICAN
CRIME TIDAL WAVE! ACCORDING TO CA ATTORNEY GEN. KAMALA HARRIS, NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN CA ARE BY MEXICAN
GANGS!
CA HAS THE LARGEST AND MOST EXPENSIVE PRISON SYSTEM. HALF
THE INMATES ARE MEXICANS.
OF THE TOP 200 MOST WANTED CRIMINALS IN LOS ANGELES, 183 ARE
MEXICANS, AND MOST OF THE REST ARE RUSSIANS.
*
WILL MEXICO
BANKRUPT AMERICA LIKE IT HAS MEXIFORNIA?
BOOK: Mexifornia: SHATTERING OF AN
AMERICAN DREAM (illegals call it their DREAM ACT)
Calif.
Hospitals Spend $1.25 Bil On Illegal Immigrants
July 05, 2011
While
the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret amnesty plan, hospitals across the
U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of medically treating illegal
immigrants and some are finally demanding compensation from the federal
government.The group that represents most of the nation’s hospitals and medical
providers recently urged President Obama to work with Congress to reimburse
them for the monstrous cost of treating illegal immigrants. Federal law requires
facilities to “treat and stabilize individuals” regardless of their immigration
status, but federal support for the services remains “virtually
nonexistent,”
according to a letter submitted by the American Hospital Association to the
president.This week officials in California, the state with the largest
concentration of illegal immigrants, joined the call for federal compensation
after revealing that hospitals there spend about $1.25 billion annually to care for illegal
aliens. The figure skyrocketed from $1.05 billion in 2007, according to California
Hospital Association figures quoted in a local news report.The problem will
only get worst, according to officials, who say the $1.25 billion for 2010
could actually be higher. They complain that federal law forces them to treat
patients in emergency rooms regardless of immigration status yet they get stuck
with the financial burden. This has forced many hospitals to curtail services
or close beds and could ultimately compromise healthcare. Nationwide, U.S.
taxpayers spend tens of billions of dollars annually to provide free medical
care for illegal immigrants with states that border Mexico taking the biggest
hit. Adding to the problem is the fact that Mexico, the country that provides
the largest amount of illegal immigrants in the U.S., has long promoted
America’s generous public health centers. It even operates a Spanish-language
program
(Ventanillas de Salud, Health Windows) in about a dozen U.S. cities that refers
its nationals—living in the country illegally—to publicly funded health centers
where they can get free medical care without being turned over to immigration
authorities.
*
Lloyd Billingsley
The DREAM and the Nightmare
In California, students are better off being illegal immigrants than legal.
30 March 2012
The DREAM and the Nightmare
In California, students are better off being illegal immigrants than legal.
30 March 2012
Last
year, Governor Jerry Brown signed the California DREAM Act, which makes
students in the country illegally eligible for grants and waivers to attend one
of the state’s public colleges or universities. The students must have attended
school in the state for three years, “affirm that they are in the process of
applying to legalize their immigration status,” and show both financial need
and academic achievement. Assemblyman Gil Cedillo, the Los Angeles Democrat who
authored the DREAM Act, hails the legislation as a victory for those “in the
country through no fault of their own.” Opponents such as Republican
assemblyman Tim Donnelly—a first-term legislator not given to
understatement—called Cedillo’s legislation the “California Nightmare Act,” said it is “morally wrong,” and would create “a new entitlement that is going to cause tens of thousands of people
to come here illegally from all over the world.”
Poster
children for the DREAM Act abound. Mandeep Chahal, for example, was six years
old when her parents brought her to the United States from India. Chahal wants
to be a doctor; her fellow students at Los Altos High School near Palo Alto
voted her the person “Most Likely to Save the World.” That’s a tall order, but
to deny such a person the opportunity seems unreasonable. “Many parents of
these children pay taxes for many services they cannot get,” argues Cedillo.
Cedillo’s
point implies that illegal immigrants are the only ones subject to this
dynamic. But consider: my taxes subsidize the Medi-Cal system, which provides
medical care for low-income state residents, but I couldn’t “get” health care
that way, even in the year my income was so low that my daughter qualified for
a Pell Grant. Likewise, the taxes of, say, a California welder help pay for
top-drawer pensions
and benefits for state government employees, but he can’t enjoy those benefits
himself. Neither is he entitled to get a government job merely because his
taxes help pay the salaries and benefits of workers at the Department of Motor
Vehicles, CalTrans, the California Air Resources Board, the Franchise Tax
Board, California’s Department of Education, the State Board of Equalization,
the Coastal Commission, and on and on.
The
taxes of a fast-food worker help subsidize the University of California at
Berkeley, but nothing guarantees that taxpayer admission to Berkeley. The
state’s Master Plan for Higher Education does guarantee everyone a place in the
system, whether at a community college, a state university, or within the UC
system. But no one is promised a place at the top, and the system grants no
special favors to legal immigrants. When I came to the United States, legally,
in 1977, I had been studying at the University of Windsor, a four-year school
in my hometown of Windsor, Ontario. I wanted to continue my studies at San
Diego State University but was not allowed to transfer because I hadn’t
attended high school in California. SDSU administrators suggested I try the
state’s community college system, which seemed a step down from what I had in
mind. But eventually, I put two children through San Diego State. They’re now
working in productive careers, a tax burden to no one. No legislation rewards
parents for that achievement or for coming to the United States with proper
documents.
Cedillo’s law, by contrast,
rewards those who came to California illegally. Will the law, therefore,
encourage more people to enter the state illegally, as Donnelly and other
critics assert?
(IN FACT THERE ARE MORE THAN
11 MILLION ILLEGALS IN SOUTHERN CA ALONE! NOW NEARLY 40% OF CA ARE ILLEGALS,
33% OF NEVADA AND 24% OF COLORADO. MOST
NON LA RAZA PROPAGANDA SOURCES BUT THE NUMBER OF ILLEGALS AT 40 MILLION
AND BREEDING LIKE BUNNIES!)
Recall
how Congress passed and President Ronald Reagan signed the Immigration Reform
and Control Act of 1986, which gave amnesty to several million undocumented
immigrants. A quarter of a century later, the number of illegal immigrants
stands at 11.5 million. It seems clear
that the 1986 act didn’t discourage foreign nationals from entering the United
States without signing the guest book. One of those who obtained
citizenship under the Act was Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa, who made his way
through UC Berkeley and Harvard Medical School and is now associate professor
of neurosurgery and oncology at the Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center in
Baltimore. Quinones-Hinojosa and others who have spoken out in support of the
DREAM Act often give the impression that their cases are typical of illegal
aliens. Not exactly. Amnesty measures, however well-intentioned, usually bring
unintended consequences.
THE REALITY OF LA RAZA’S LOOTING OF CA:
Consider Ignacio Mesa Viera,
subject of a recent front-page story in the Sacramento
Bee. He came to the United States illegally in 1979 to work and help his
family, as he explained, but was convicted on a drug offense in 1995. He was
deported but returned to the United States, whereupon he was busted for another
drug offense in 2008. Before his recent deportation, the U.S. government was
paying for Viera’s kidney dialysis, a treatment that can cost more than $60,000
a year. “I imagine that the reason they don’t want to let me stay in this
country,” Viera told the Bee, “is they don’t want to be paying for
this.”
Cedillo
and his colleagues need to know that everybody’s taxes pay for services they
and their children “cannot get”—including kidney dialysis and other expensive
medical treatments courtesy of the federal government. Meantime, as a University of California report noted last year, tens of
thousands of middle-class, taxpaying legal residents are being squeezed out of
an affordable college education even as the legislature contrives to provide
scholarships for the children of illegal aliens. The lawmakers’ solution
is to create yet another entitlement in the form of a new $1 billion
scholarship program for students whose families earn less than $150,000 a year.
Such is life in the Golden State, even with a DREAM Act in place.
Lloyd
Billingsley is the author of Hollywood Party: How Communism Seduced the American Film Industry
in the 1930s and 1940s
and the former editorial director of the Pacific Research Institute.
*
OBAMA
HAS PROMISED HIS LA RAZA “THE RACE” PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS AMNESTY, NO
E-VERIFY, NO I.D. FOR REQUIRED OF ILLEGALS VOTING… OR AT LEAST CONTINUED
NON-ENFORCEMENT!
OBAMA
HANDS MASSIVE WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, ALONG WITH OUR JOBS TO BUY THE ILLEGALS'
ILLEGAL VOTES!
Most Illegal
Immigrant Families Collect Welfare
April 05, 2011
Surprise,
surprise; Census Bureau data reveals that most U.S. families headed by illegal
immigrants use taxpayer-funded welfare programs on behalf of their
American-born anchor babies. Even before the recession, immigrant households
with children used welfare programs at consistently higher rates than natives,
according to the extensive census data collected and analyzed by a nonpartisan Washington
D.C. group dedicated to researching legal and illegal immigration in the U.S.
The results, published this month in a lengthy report, are hardly surprising. Basically, the majority of
households across the country benefitting from publicly-funded welfare programs
are headed by immigrants, both legal and illegal. States where immigrant
households with children have the highest welfare use rates are Arizona (62%),
Texas, California and New York with 61% each and Pennsylvania(59%).The study
focused on eight major welfare programs that cost the government $517 billion
the year they were examined. They include Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
for the disabled, Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), a nutritional
program known as Women, Infants and Children (WIC), food stamps, free/reduced
school lunch, public housing and health insurance for the poor (Medicaid).Food
assistance and Medicaid are the programs most commonly used by illegal
immigrants, mainly on behalf of their American-born children who get automatic
citizenship. On the other hand, legal immigrant households take advantage of
every available welfare program, according to the study, which attributes it to
low education level and resulting low income. The highest rate of welfare
recipients come from the Dominican Republic (82 %), Mexico and Guatemala (75%)
and Ecuador (70%), according to the report, which says welfare use tends to be
high for both new arrivals and established residents.
No comments:
Post a Comment