YOU WILL NOT BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY HOLDER WITH ANYTHING THAT
HAS BENEFITED BLACK AMERICANS (legals). HE IS ON THE ROAD HISPANDERING! GOING
TO LA RAZA RALLIES WHERE HE PROMISES ILLEGALS MORE OF OBAMA’S GRINGO-PAID DREAM
ACTS, LAWSUITS AGAINST AMERICAN STATES ON BEHALF OF OBAMA’S LA RAZA AGENDA,
SABOTAGE OF E-VERIFY TO EASE MORE ILLEGALS INTO OUR JOBS, AND PUSH FOR AMNESTY
or at least continued NON-ENFORCEMENT.
OBAMA’S ENTIRE ADMINISTRATION IS INFESTED WITH LA RAZA
SUPREMACIST. HIS WORTHLESS SEC. of (illegal) LABOR IS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA
SOLIS!
OBAMA FUNDS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA WITH OUR
TAX DOLLARS AND IT OPERATES OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER LA RAZA CECELIA MUNOZ.
EVEN OBAMA’S APPOINTEE TO THE HIGH COURT, SONIA SOTOMAYOR IS
A MEMBER OF LA RAZA. THIS SELF-STYLED “WISE LATINA” WAS NOMINATED BECAUSE OF
HER LONG PANDERING TO BIG BUSINESS AND SPECIAL INTERESTS AS WELL AS HER
CONNECTION TO LA RAZA… IN OTHER WORDS, SOTOMAYOR IS OBAMA IN A SKIRT!
Obama soft on illegals enforcement
Arrests of illegal immigrant workers have dropped precipitously under President Obama, according to figures released Wednesday. Criminal arrests, administrative arrests, indictments and convictions of illegal immigrants at work sites all fell by more than 50 percent from fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2009.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
*
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH'S 10 MOST CORRUPT
Attorney General Eric Holder:
A regular on our annual Top Ten Corrupt list, Holder shamelessly operates the most blatantly politicized Department of Justice (DOJ) in a generation. And, with the Operation Fast and Furious scandal, it is no exaggeration that his agency has blood on its hands.
Fast and Furious was a reckless DOJ/Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) "gun-running" scheme in which guns were sold to Mexican drug cartels and others, apparently in the hope that the guns would end up at crime scenes. Well, they did - and it appears that the guns were involved in the deaths of hundreds of Mexican citizens, as well as the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, who was killed in a shootout with Mexican criminals in December 2010. On December 5, 2012, CBS News reported that 17 DOJ and ATF officials had been faulted in an Inspector General investigation of the Fast and Furious scandal. But, the man at the top remains unscathed, even after becoming the first attorney general in history to be cited for criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to divulge documents about DOJ lies to Congress about Fast and Furious.
Every day that Eric Holder remains at the helm, the Department of Justice sinks further into the abyss of cronyism, corruption, and deceit. And it is well past time for him to go.
The figures show that Mr. Obama has made good on his pledge to shift enforcement away from going after illegal immigrant workers themselves - but at the expense of Americans' jobs, said Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, the Republican who compiled the numbers from the Department of Homeland Security's U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE). Mr. Smith, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said a period of economic turmoil is the wrong time to be cutting enforcement and letting illegal immigrants take jobs that Americans otherwise would hold.
*
FROM JUDICIAL WATCH'S 10 MOST CORRUPT
Attorney General Eric Holder:
A regular on our annual Top Ten Corrupt list, Holder shamelessly operates the most blatantly politicized Department of Justice (DOJ) in a generation. And, with the Operation Fast and Furious scandal, it is no exaggeration that his agency has blood on its hands.
Fast and Furious was a reckless DOJ/Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) "gun-running" scheme in which guns were sold to Mexican drug cartels and others, apparently in the hope that the guns would end up at crime scenes. Well, they did - and it appears that the guns were involved in the deaths of hundreds of Mexican citizens, as well as the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, who was killed in a shootout with Mexican criminals in December 2010. On December 5, 2012, CBS News reported that 17 DOJ and ATF officials had been faulted in an Inspector General investigation of the Fast and Furious scandal. But, the man at the top remains unscathed, even after becoming the first attorney general in history to be cited for criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to divulge documents about DOJ lies to Congress about Fast and Furious.
Every day that Eric Holder remains at the helm, the Department of Justice sinks further into the abyss of cronyism, corruption, and deceit. And it is well past time for him to go.
|
||||||
|
||||||
*
The Obama administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to citizens and legal workers.
JUDGE SOTOMAYOR,
SIMPLY OBAMA IN A SKIRT?
A WALL STREET ASS
LICKING LA RAZA SUPREMACIST
Sonia Sotomayor opposes E-Verify
requirement
True to form, she said it was
illegal to make employers e-verify citizen status of new hires.
Interesting, she says a state cannot force employers to check if employees they are hiring are illegal. Thankfully the court ruled 5-3 supporting law. But now we know for sure just how extreme far left Obama's choice was. We cannot afford Obama to get another term, or you can bet this country will be overrun by illegals. I don't want this country to be poor and corrupt like Mexico, which it will if illegals overrun the country.
*Interesting, she says a state cannot force employers to check if employees they are hiring are illegal. Thankfully the court ruled 5-3 supporting law. But now we know for sure just how extreme far left Obama's choice was. We cannot afford Obama to get another term, or you can bet this country will be overrun by illegals. I don't want this country to be poor and corrupt like Mexico, which it will if illegals overrun the country.
Obama Administration Challenges
Arizona E-Verify Law
The
Obama administration has asked the Supreme Court to strike down a 2007 Arizona law that punishes employers who
hire illegal aliens, a law enacted by then-Governor Janet Napolitano. (Solicitor General's Amicus
Curiae Brief).
Called the “Legal Arizona Workers Act,” the law requires all employers in
Arizona to use E-Verify and provides that the business licenses of those who
hire illegal workers shall be repealed. From the date of enactment, the
Chamber of Commerce and other special interest groups have been trying to undo
it, attacking it through a failed ballot initiative and also through a lawsuit.
Now the Chamber is asking the United States Supreme Court to hear the case (Chamber
of Commerce v. Candelaria), and the Obama Administration is weighing in
against the law.
To
date, Arizona’s E-Verify law has been upheld by all lower courts, including the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit, in particular, viewed it as
an exercise of a state’s traditional power to regulate businesses. (San Francisco Chronicle, June 2, 2010).
Obama’s Justice Department, however, disagrees. Acting Solicitor General Neal
Katyal said in his filing with the Supreme Court that the lower courts were
wrong to uphold the statute because federal immigration law expressly preempts
any state law imposing sanctions on employers hiring illegal immigrants.
Mr. Katyal argues that this is not a licensing law, but “a statute that
prohibits the hiring of unauthorized aliens and uses suspension and revocation
of all state-issued licenses as its ultimate sanction.” (Solicitor General's Amicus
Curiae Brief,
p. 10). This is the administration’s first court challenge to a state’s
authority to act against illegal immigration, and could be a preview of the
battle brewing over Arizona’s recent illegal immigration crackdown through SB
1070.
Napolitano
has made no comment on the Department of Justice’s decision to challenge the
2007 law, but federal officials said that she has taken an active part in the
debate over whether to do so. (Politico, May 28, 2010).
As Governor of Arizona, Napolitano said she believed the state law was valid
and became a defendant in the many lawsuits against it. (Id.).
*
Sotomayor’s record: A judicial
pragmatist and defender of corporate interests … WHICH
MAKES HER AN OBAMA IN A SKIRT
By Don Knowland
17 July 2009
17 July 2009
As
a nominee to the US Supreme Court, Sonia Sotomayor is reliable defender of
corporate interests, siding with big business, government authority and the
police far more than with the poor, the arrested or the oppressed. With 17
years on the federal courts, the most of any Supreme Court nominee in more than
half a century, she is anything but an unknown quantity.
In
her five years as a federal district court trial judge, Sotomayor issued
hundreds of written decisions. In 12 years on the appellate court, she has been
the principal author of over 150 opinions. She joined in the majority opinion
in over 350 cases.
A
survey of her written decisions reveals a jurist firmly wedded to the bourgeois
mainstream, particularly when business interests are at stake, and not given to
sweeping formulations. The New York Times legal correspondent assigned
to cover the Supreme Court wrote that Sotomayor’s opinions “reveal no larger
vision, seldom appeal to history and consistently avoid quotable language.”
A
Congressional Research Service analysis found that Sotomayor’s rulings could
not be easily categorized in ideological terms, and “showed an adherence to
precedent, an emphasis on the facts of a case, and an avoidance of overstepping
the court’s judicial role.”
According
to one of Sotomayor’s former law clerks, “She is a rule-bound pragmatist-very
geared toward determining what the right answer is and what the law
dictates...” Sotomayor herself has professed to follow a narrow “just the
facts” approach to judicial decision-making, a style described by some as
judicial minimalism.
However,
when important issues arise that affect more fundamental interests of the
ruling elite, such as national security matters or big economic questions,
Sotomayor comes down invariably on the side of the establishment, at the
expense of the majority of society.
A law-and-order judge
As
with most former prosecutors, Sotomayor has a negative if not hostile view of
the rights of those accused of crimes. Encomiums from her former associates at
the Manhattan District Attorney’s office and various New York and national
police organizations were read into the record of her confirmation hearing.
According
to Leroy Frazer Jr., first assistant district attorney in Manhattan and a
former colleague of Sotomayor, she “has contributed greatly to law enforcement
in New York” as a judge. John Siffert, an attorney who taught appellate
advocacy with Sotomayor at New York University School of Law for ten years,
confirms that she is loath to overturn criminal convictions. “She was not
viewed as a pro-defense judge” while she sat as a trial judge, Siffert told the
press.
One
decision Sotomayor authored as an appellate judge upheld the use of evidence
police seized mistakenly, thinking they had a warrant. The Supreme Court’s
five-justice conservative bloc came to the same conclusion this year, over the
dissent of the court’s four moderate justices. Jeffrey Fisher, a Stanford Law
School professor who was on the losing side of the January Supreme Court
decision, said Judge Sotomayor’s ruling displayed her “willingness to give
police the benefit of the doubt.”
One
case decided by Sotomayor as an appellate judge involved the timeliness of the habeas
corpus petition filed by a prisoner convicted of murder and rape. Congress
had only recently passed President Bill Clinton’s Anti-Terrorism-Effective
Death Penalty Act, which imposed a one-year time limit on such petitions.
Confusion existed in the federal courts regarding how the new law would be
applied to pending cases. Following the advice of a court clerk, the
defendant’s attorney mailed in rather than filed the appeal the day it was due.
Sotomayor
and her colleagues on the case refused to consider the petition, ruling that it
was untimely and that its lateness was not excusable. They also summarily
brushed off the defendant’s claim to innocence, even though guilt was based on
a confession the police coerced when the defendant was 17. The defendant then
spent six more years in jail before DNA testing conclusively established his
innocence.
Capital and labor
While frequently dissenting
against reactionary rulings on issues involving democratic rights, the
four-justice moderate bloc on the Supreme Court has increasingly tended to join
the court’s right wing in favoring big business over workers and consumers
where their economic interests are explicitly counterposed, as in cases
involving punitive damage awards against giant corporations.
Sotomayor
is unlikely to buck that trend. She currently sits in the Second Circuit Court
of Appeals, which hears the most important appeals affecting Wall Street and
the financial industry. That court’s 2006 decision strongly favored Wall Street
in a group of cases involving thousands of investors suing dozens of the
largest banks and investment houses, including Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs,
Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank and the now
defunct Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers. The plaintiffs charged massive fraud
involving manipulation of the market for initial public offerings of company
shares. Such schemes played a major role in inflating the dot.com and telecom
bubbles.
As
a practical matter, the plaintiffs in the case could proceed only if they could
band together for class actions. The appellate ruling dismissed the cases on
the basis that questions as to what information and assurances individual
plaintiffs relied on in purchasing shares precluded finding sufficient
commonality to permit the cases to proceed on a class action basis. This
amounted to an extremely strained reading of the rules regarding class action
suits and reduced the value of the plaintiffs’ recovery by many billions of
dollars.
Sotomayor’s
most well known decision as a district court judge involved her issuing an
injunction in 1995 against baseball team owners during the longest strike in
baseball history, which followed an owner lock-out of players. Sotomayor ruled
that the National Relations Labor Board had cause to believe that baseball owners
committed unfair labor practices by eliminating free agency and salary
arbitration provisions of the expired collective bargaining agreement. She
ordered the owners to bargain in good faith on those issues. The strike then
ended.
As
an appellate judge, Sotomayor has favored working class plaintiffs mainly in
disability cases. In one case, Sotomayor ruled that New York did not
sufficiently accommodate a dyslexic applicant taking the bar examination.
Sotomayor
dissented in a 2003 case brought by the federal Equal Opportunity Employment
Commission against a major trucking company relating to discrimination against
drivers who took medication that the company believed impaired driving. Federal
regulations provide that discrimination occurs if a company perceives that a
worker or workers have an impairment as to a “class of jobs” compared to
average persons of comparable skill, as opposed to single jobs. The majority
dismissed the case, saying that the evidence showed only that the employer
perceived the drivers as incapable of long-distance, stressful driving jobs.
Sotomayor argued that there was sufficient evidence that the employer perceived
the impairment to extend to any truck driving jobs, an entire “class of jobs,”
such that the case should proceed to trial.
Constitutional rights
Outside
of the criminal case context, Sotomayor has shown some favor toward suits
challenging violation of the Fourth Amendment probable cause and warrant
requirements and due process rights.
In
a 2002 case, Sotomayor wrote that New York City’s policy of seizing and then
keeping for an extended period of time, sometimes for years, vehicles used by
alleged drunk drivers or in other misdemeanor crimes violated the due process
clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
The
City’s ordinance permitted it to file a civil case seeking the forfeiture of
vehicles of those found guilty. But the forfeiture cases were often deferred
for many months or even years, while the underlying criminal cases were
resolved. Sotomayor’s ruling required a meaningful hearing at a meaningful time
as to whether the vehicle’s owner could recover it. Her decision reversed the
trial court ruling of then-District Judge Michael Mukasey, who later became
George Bush’s last attorney general.
In
a case seeking damages for a house search based on a flawed warrant, Sotomayor
dissented in order to challenge the formulation used by the majority to define
when a police officer is entitled to “qualified immunity” from suit for such a
violation. The Supreme Court excuses an officer from such constitutional
violations unless the law is so clear that an objectively reasonable officer
could not believe his conduct is lawful. Sotomayor objected to her circuit’s
formulation of this defense that gave police officers extra latitude in meeting
that standard.
Sotomayor
wrote a 2006 opinion approving suspicionless searches of passenger carry-on
luggage and car trunks before boarding a ferry, based on the government’s
purported interest in deterring terrorist attacks on large vessels engaged in
mass transportation. She joined another decision that struck down a portion of
the Patriot Act relating to disclosure of National Security Letters on First
Amendment grounds.
In
a 2002 case, Sotomayor authored an opinion that gave prison officials wide
latitude to infringe prisoner First Amendment rights by withholding incoming
mail if they could articulate some security justification for such action. In
other cases, Sotomayor has granted latitude to prisoners in exercising religious
rights.
Wsws.org…
get on their free daily emails for updates on corporate rape and pillage
*
Lou Dobbs
Tonight
Thursday, July 9, 2009
And Harvard economics professor JEFFREY MIRON will weigh in on the state of the U.S. economy—and why the only plausible argument for bailing out banks crumbles on close examination.
Thursday, July 9, 2009
And Harvard economics professor JEFFREY MIRON will weigh in on the state of the U.S. economy—and why the only plausible argument for bailing out banks crumbles on close examination.
*
From the Los Angeles Times
SOTOMAYOR…
LA RAZA SUPREMACIST
She said the nation is "deeply confused" about
the proper role of race and ethnic identity, and she maintained that her
identity as a Latina shaped her life and her work in court. She hoped "a
wise Latina" would reach a "better conclusion" than a white
male, she said on several occasions.
Speeches reveal more about Sotomayor's thoughts on race
The Senate Judiciary Committee receives a file on the
Supreme Court nominee's life from Princeton onward. She has spoken on other
occasions of ethnic identity and her hopes about 'wise Latina' judges.
By David G. Savage
June 5, 2009
Reporting from Washington — Judge Sonia Sotomayor, already facing controversy for a 2001 speech on the virtue of having "a wise Latina" as a judge, made similar comments in a series of speeches released Thursday.
She said the nation is "deeply confused" about the proper role of race and ethnic identity, and she maintained that her identity as a Latina shaped her life and her work in court. She hoped "a wise Latina" would reach a "better conclusion" than a white male, she said on several occasions.
Since her nomination, conservative activists have cited the comment as evidence that she would rule based on her ethnic identity.
President Obama sought to defuse the criticism last week. "I'm sure she would have restated it," he said, adding that she was "simply saying that her life experience will give her information about the struggles and hardships that people are going through."
The speeches were among a thick file, including court opinions and financial documents, that the White House sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. They cover 35 years of Sotomayor's life, from her days as a Princeton student through her time as a prosecutor, corporate lawyer, trial judge and appeals court judge.
She reported a net worth of $740,000, consisting mostly of her $1.1-million condominium in New York City. She has a $381,000 mortgage and about $31,000 in the bank. She reported owning no stocks, bonds or mutual funds.
She said that White House Counsel Gregory Craig first contacted her about the Supreme Court vacancy on April 27 -- five days before Justice David H. Souter publicly announced he was retiring.
In a speech at Princeton in 1996, she said: "I began a lifelong commitment to identifying myself as a Latina" while at Princeton, "taking pride in being Hispanic, and in recognizing my obligation to help my community reach its fullest potential in this society."
She added: "I underscore that in saying this I am not promoting ethnic segregation. I am promoting just the opposite: an ethnic identity and pride which impels us to work with others in the larger society to achieve advancement for the people of our cultures."
"America has a deeply confused image of itself that is a perpetual source of tension," she said at a 2006 gathering of Latino students at Yale Law School. "We are a nation that takes pride in our ethnic diversity, recognizing its importance in shaping our society and in adding richness to its existence. Yet we simultaneously insist that we can and must function and live in a race- and colorblind way that ignores those very differences that in other contexts we laud."
She said that the Supreme Court was "just as fractured" as society over the role of race in public decisions, such as college affirmative action.
"This tension leads many of us to struggle with maintaining and promoting our cultural and ethnic identities in a society that is often ambivalent about to how to deal with its differences," she said.
Sotomayor repeated that she disagreed with a comment attributed to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor that "a wise old man and a wise old woman reach the same conclusion" in deciding cases. "I'm not so sure that I agree with the statement," she said at Seton Hall Law in 2003. "I would hope a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion."
Two years earlier, at the UC Berkeley law school, she said she hoped the "wise Latina" would reach "a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."
She said the nation is "deeply confused" about the proper role of race and ethnic identity, and she maintained that her identity as a Latina shaped her life and her work in court. She hoped "a wise Latina" would reach a "better conclusion" than a white male, she said on several occasions.
THE FASTEST GROWING POLITICAL POWER IN AMERICA IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA and M.E.Ch.A.
June 5, 2009
Reporting from Washington — Judge Sonia Sotomayor, already facing controversy for a 2001 speech on the virtue of having "a wise Latina" as a judge, made similar comments in a series of speeches released Thursday.
She said the nation is "deeply confused" about the proper role of race and ethnic identity, and she maintained that her identity as a Latina shaped her life and her work in court. She hoped "a wise Latina" would reach a "better conclusion" than a white male, she said on several occasions.
Since her nomination, conservative activists have cited the comment as evidence that she would rule based on her ethnic identity.
President Obama sought to defuse the criticism last week. "I'm sure she would have restated it," he said, adding that she was "simply saying that her life experience will give her information about the struggles and hardships that people are going through."
The speeches were among a thick file, including court opinions and financial documents, that the White House sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. They cover 35 years of Sotomayor's life, from her days as a Princeton student through her time as a prosecutor, corporate lawyer, trial judge and appeals court judge.
She reported a net worth of $740,000, consisting mostly of her $1.1-million condominium in New York City. She has a $381,000 mortgage and about $31,000 in the bank. She reported owning no stocks, bonds or mutual funds.
She said that White House Counsel Gregory Craig first contacted her about the Supreme Court vacancy on April 27 -- five days before Justice David H. Souter publicly announced he was retiring.
In a speech at Princeton in 1996, she said: "I began a lifelong commitment to identifying myself as a Latina" while at Princeton, "taking pride in being Hispanic, and in recognizing my obligation to help my community reach its fullest potential in this society."
She added: "I underscore that in saying this I am not promoting ethnic segregation. I am promoting just the opposite: an ethnic identity and pride which impels us to work with others in the larger society to achieve advancement for the people of our cultures."
"America has a deeply confused image of itself that is a perpetual source of tension," she said at a 2006 gathering of Latino students at Yale Law School. "We are a nation that takes pride in our ethnic diversity, recognizing its importance in shaping our society and in adding richness to its existence. Yet we simultaneously insist that we can and must function and live in a race- and colorblind way that ignores those very differences that in other contexts we laud."
She said that the Supreme Court was "just as fractured" as society over the role of race in public decisions, such as college affirmative action.
"This tension leads many of us to struggle with maintaining and promoting our cultural and ethnic identities in a society that is often ambivalent about to how to deal with its differences," she said.
Sotomayor repeated that she disagreed with a comment attributed to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor that "a wise old man and a wise old woman reach the same conclusion" in deciding cases. "I'm not so sure that I agree with the statement," she said at Seton Hall Law in 2003. "I would hope a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experience would, more often than not, reach a better conclusion."
Two years earlier, at the UC Berkeley law school, she said she hoped the "wise Latina" would reach "a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."
She said the nation is "deeply confused" about the proper role of race and ethnic identity, and she maintained that her identity as a Latina shaped her life and her work in court. She hoped "a wise Latina" would reach a "better conclusion" than a white male, she said on several occasions.
THE FASTEST GROWING POLITICAL POWER IN AMERICA IS THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA and M.E.Ch.A.
OBAMA’S LOS ANGLES MAYOR ANTONIO
VILLARAIGOSA, ELECTED BY ILLEGALS, IS A M.E.Ch.A. PARTY MEMBER!
MORE:
TAKEN FROM TRANSCRIPTS DATED 1995. MANY OF
THESE LA RAZA POLITICIANS HAVE WON HIGHER OFFICES WITH THE VOTES OF ILLEGALS.
“WE WILL TAKE CONTROL OF OUR COUNTRY (U.S.) BY VOTE IF
POSSIBLE AND VIOLENCE IF NECESSARY!”
Agendas
of MEChA, La Raza, MALDEF, and Southwest Voter Registration Projects These are
transcripts of live, recorded statements by elected U.S. politicians, college professors,
and pro-illegal alien activists whose objective is to take control of our
country "by vote if possible and violence if necessary!" 1. Armando
Navarro, Prof. Ethnic Studies, UC Riverside at Latino Summit Response to Prop
187, UC Riverside, 1/1995
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN IS TO CUT WAGES!
"We could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal workers," said Representative Lamar Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim American Jobs Caucus. "President Obama is on the wrong side of the American people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to enforce immigration laws."
VIVA LA RAZA! THE INVASION AND OCCUPATION IS NOW EXPANDING TO ALL OTHER 49 STATES!
*
Illegal labor pool and its impact on unemployment rates
http://www.onenewsnow.com/politics-govt/2012/12/20/illegal-labor-pool-and-its-impact-on-unemployment-rates
*
WHY THE JOBS GO TO ILLEGALS:
“What employers really want in many cases by hiring
immigrants is to hold down wage costs, experts say.”
MEXICANOCCUPATION.blogspot.com
OBAMA HAS
FILLED HIS ADMINSTRATION WITH PRIMARILY LA RAZA PARTY MEMBERS.
Here’s his
Sec. Labor, HILDA SOLIS:
While in
Congress, she opposed strengthening the border fence, supported expansion of
illegal alien benefits (including driver's licenses and in-state tuition discounts),
embraced sanctuary cities that refused to cooperate with federal homeland
security officials to enforce immigration laws, and aggressively championed a
mass amnesty. Solis was steeped in the pro-illegal alien worker organizing
movement in Southern California and was buoyed by amnesty-supporting Big Labor
groups led by the Service Employees International Union. She has now caused a
Capitol Hill firestorm over her new taxpayer-funded advertising and outreach
campaign to illegal aliens regarding fair wages:
The U.S. Department of Illegal Alien Labor
President Obama's Labor Secretary Hilda Solis is supposed to
represent American workers. What you need to know is that this longtime
open-borders sympathizer has always had a rather radical definition of
"American." At a Latino voter registration project conference in Los
Angeles many years ago, Solis asserted to thunderous applause, "We are all
Americans, whether you are legalized or not."
That's right. The woman in charge of enforcing our employment laws
doesn't give a hoot about our immigration laws -- or about the fundamental
distinction between those who followed the rules in pursuit of the American
dream and those who didn't.
While in
Congress, she opposed strengthening the border fence, supported expansion of
illegal alien benefits (including driver's licenses and in-state tuition
discounts), embraced sanctuary cities that refused to cooperate with federal
homeland security officials to enforce immigration laws, and aggressively championed
a mass amnesty. Solis was steeped in the pro-illegal alien worker organizing
movement in Southern California and was buoyed by amnesty-supporting Big Labor
groups led by the Service Employees International Union. She has now caused a
Capitol Hill firestorm over her new taxpayer-funded advertising and outreach
campaign to illegal aliens regarding fair wages:
"I'm here to tell you that your president, your secretary of
labor and this department will not allow anyone to be denied his or her
rightful pay -- especially when so many in our nation are working long, hard
and often dangerous hours," Solis says in the video pitch. "We can
help, and we will help. If you work in this country, you are protected by our
laws. And you can count on the U.S. Department of Labor to see to it that those
protections work for you."
To be sure, no one should be scammed out of "fair
wages." Employers that hire and exploit illegal immigrant workers deserve
full sanctions and punishment. But it's the timing, tone-deafness and
underlying blanket amnesty agenda of Solis' illegal alien outreach that has so
many American workers and their representatives on Capitol Hill rightly upset.
With double-digit unemployment and a growing nationwide revolt
over Washington's border security failures, why has Solis chosen now to hire
250 new government field investigators to bolster her illegal alien workers'
rights campaign? (Hint: Leftists unhappy with Obama's lack of progress on
"comprehensive immigration reform" need appeasing. This is a quick
bone to distract them.)
Unfortunately, the federal government is not alone in lavishing
attention and resources on workers who shouldn't be here in the first place. As
of 2008, California, Florida, Nevada, New York, Texas and Utah all expressly
included illegal aliens in their state workers' compensation plans -- and more
than a dozen other states implicitly cover them.
Solis' public service announcement comes on the heels of
little-noticed but far more troubling comments encouraging illegal alien workers
in the Gulf Coast. Earlier this month, in the aftermath of the BP oil spill,
according to Spanish language publication El Diario La Prensa, Solis signaled
that her department was going out of its way to shield illegal immigrant
laborers involved in cleanup efforts. "My purpose is to assist the workers
with respect to safety and protection," she said. "We're protecting
all workers regardless of migration status because that's the federal
law." She told reporters that her department was in talks with local
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials who had visited coastal
worksites to try to verify that workers were legal.
No word yet on whether she gave ICE her "we are all
Americans, whether you are legalized or not" lecture. But it's a safe bet.
*
“What's
needed to discourage illegal immigration into the United States has been known
for years: Enforce existing law.” CHRISTIAN SCIENCE MONITOR
THE ENTIRE REASON THE BORDERS ARE LEFT OPEN
IS TO CUT WAGES!
“We
could cut unemployment in half simply by reclaiming the jobs taken by illegal
workers,” said Representative Lamar
Smith of Texas, co-chairman of the Reclaim
American Jobs Caucus. “President Obama is on the wrong side of the American
people on immigration. The president should support policies that help citizens
and legal immigrants find the jobs they need and deserve rather than fail to
enforce immigration laws.”
*
Obama Quietly Erasing Borders
(Article)
*
OBAMA
EXPANDS LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND FUNDS MEXICAN FASCISM WITH AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS
*
HEATHER MAC
DONALD – OBAMA DOES NOT WANT TO ENFORCE ANY LAWS ON LA RAZA ILLEGALS
*
JUDICIAL
WATCH – OBAMA’S LA RAZA DEPT. OF JUSTICE – SABOTAGING LAWS ON BEHALF OF OBAMA’S
LA RAZA PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS
*
LA RAZA
HILDA SOLIS and the OBAMA DEPT of (illegal) LABOR
OBAMA
PROMISES ILLEGALS AMERICAN JOBS, GRINGO PAID DREAM ACTS and LA RAZA SUPREMACY
FOR THEIR ILLEGAL VOTES
No comments:
Post a Comment