OBAMA’S SECRET AGENDA OF OPEN BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX
This WorldNet Daily article portrays a grim future for American sovereignty:
Obama signature creates 'continental perimeter'
Move described as key step in advance of North American Union
By Jerome R. Corsi
Barack Obama
and Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper quietly have taken a major step
toward erasing the border between the two nations with a new "Beyond the
Border" bilateral declaration.
In a ceremony
designed to remain below the radar of national public opinion, Obama and Harper
bypassed Congress to sign on the basis of their executive authority a
declaration that put in place a new national security vision defined not by
U.S. national borders, but by a continental view of a "North American
perimeter."
It happened Friday, the day the Obama
administration usually pushes through issues that it prefers the media ignore.
By signing the declaration, the Obama
administration has implemented without congressional approval a key initiative
President Bush began under the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North
America, moving the United States and Canada beyond the North American Free
Trade Agreement, commonly known as NAFTA, toward a developing North American
Union regional government.
The declaration signed by the two heads of state
and titled "Beyond the Border: A Shared Vision for Perimeter Security and
Economic Competitiveness," was described as "For Immediate
Release" on the websites of the White House and the Canadian chief executive.
Harper
followed Obama's lead in signing the declaration as a form of executive order,
deciding to bypass the Canadian parliament, much as Obama had decided against
taking a proposed bilateral "Beyond the Border" declaration to
Congress for prior review and approval.
The decision to declare a continental perimeter for
the United States and Canada, designed to effectively combine the two nations
in mutual national security and economic efforts, affirms the Obama
administration's intent to implement the key objectives of the Security and
Prosperity Partnership of North American in a way that avoids the type of
public scrutiny and criticism that dogged President George W. Bush after he
openly declared his plans with the SPP....
WND previously reported that the Obama
administration replaced the content of the SPP website, spp.gov, under the
title "Commerce Connect," which announces its purpose as "a
one-stop shop for information, counseling and government services that can help
U.S. businesses around the country transform themselves into globally
competitive enterprises."
Now, the Obama administration has made the spp.gov
website totally inoperative....
Read the entire article
The SPP.gov website was created under the W Bush
administration and was active from 2005-2008, and remained up until Obama
recently took it down. Here's a 2008 version of the website from the Wayback
Machine.
Here is an organization founded by myself and D.A.
King, a fellow Georgia activist and patriot. Here's the website: Society for
American Sovereignty
Notice the similarity in design? What fun!
Yours
for a Soverign America
*
ARE
WE NOT A LOOTED COLONY OF MEXICO'S? WHERE THEY EXPORT POVERTY, CRIMINALS AND
ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS AND BUILD THEIR MEXICAN DRUG CARTEL MARKETS?
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, June 16, 2008
Tonight,
we’ll have all the latest on the devastating floods in the Midwest and all the
day’s news from the campaign trail. The
massive corporate mouthpiece the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is holding a “North
American Forum” to lay out its “shared vision” for the United States, Canada
and Mexico – which is to say a borderless, pro-business super-state in which
U.S. sovereignty will be dissolved. Undercover investigators have found
incredibly lax security and enforcement at U.S. border crossings, according to
a new report by the Government Accountability Office. This report comes on the
heels of a separate report by U.C. San Diego that shows tougher border security
efforts aren’t deterring illegal entries to the United States.
*
The
Administration's Phantom Immigration Enforcement Policy
According to
DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or
otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the
department.
By
Ira Mehlman
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
Published on 12/07/2009
Townhall.com
The
setting was not quite the flight deck of the U.S.S. Abraham Lincoln with a
“Mission Accomplished” banner as the backdrop, but it was the next best thing. Speaking at the Center for American Progress (CAP) on
Nov. 13, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano declared victory over
illegal immigration and announced that the Obama administration is ready to
move forward with a mass amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens already
living in the United States.
Arguing
the Obama administration’s case for amnesty, Napolitano laid out what she
described as the “three-legged stool” for immigration reform. As the
administration views it, immigration reform must include “a commitment to
serious and effective enforcement, improved legal flows for families and
workers, and a firm but fair way to deal with those who are already here.”
Acknowledging
that a lack of confidence in the government’s ability and commitment to
effectively enforce the immigration laws it passes proved to be the Waterloo of
previous efforts to gain amnesty for illegal aliens, Napolitano was quick to
reassure the American public that those concerns could be put to rest.
“For
starters, the security of the Southwest border has been transformed from where
it was in 2007,” stated the secretary. Not only is the border locked up tight,
she continued, but the situation is well in-hand in the interior of the country
as well. “We’ve also shown that the government is serious and strategic in its
approach to enforcement by making changes in how we enforce the law in the
interior of the country and at worksites…Furthermore, we’ve transformed
worksite enforcement to truly address the demand side of illegal immigration.”
If
Rep. Joe Wilson had been in attendance to hear Secretary Napolitano’s CAP
speech he might well have had a few choice comments to offer. But since he
wasn’t, we will have to rely on the Department of Homeland Security’s own data
to assess the veracity of Napolitano’s claims.
According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s
borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even
a goal of the department. DHS claims to have “effective control” over just 894
miles of border. That’s 894 out of 8,607 miles they are charged with
protecting. As for the other 7,713 miles? DHS’s stated border security goal for
FY 2010 is the same 894 miles.
The
administration’s strategic approach to interior and worksite enforcement is
just as chimerical as its strategy at the border, unless one considers
shuffling paper to be a strategy. DHS data,
released November 18, show that administrative arrests of immigration law
violators fell by 68 percent between 2008 and 2009. The department also carried
out 60 percent fewer arrests for criminal violations of immigration laws, 58
percent fewer criminal indictments, and won 63 percent fewer convictions.
While
the official unemployment rate has climbed from 7.6 percent when President
Obama took office in January to 10 percent today, the administration’s worksite
enforcement strategy has amounted to a bureaucratic game of musical chairs. The
administration has all but ended worksite enforcement actions and replaced them
with paperwork audits. When the audits determine that illegal aliens are on the
payroll, employers are given the opportunity to fire them with little or no
adverse consequence to the company, while no action is taken to remove the
illegal workers from the country. The illegal workers simply acquire a new set
of fraudulent documents and move on to the next employer seeking workers
willing to accept substandard wages.
In
Janet Napolitano’s alternative reality a mere 10 percent of our borders under
“effective control”and sharp declines in arrests and prosecutions of
immigration lawbreakers may be construed as confidence builders, but it is hard
to imagine that the American public is going to see it that way. If anything, the administration’s
record has left the public less confident that promises of future immigration
enforcement would be worth the government paper they’re printed on.
As
Americans scrutinize the administration’s plans to overhaul immigration policy,
they are likely to find little in the “three-legged stool” being offered that
they like or trust. The first leg – enforcement – the administration has all
but sawed off. The second – increased admissions
of extended family members and workers –makes little sense with some 25 million
Americans either unemployed or relegated to part-time work. And the
third – amnesty for millions of illegal aliens – is anathema to their sense of
justice and fair play.
As Americans well know, declaring “Mission Accomplished” and actually accomplishing a mission are two completely different things. When it comes to enforcing immigration laws, the only message the public is receiving from this administration is “Mission Aborted.”
*
WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA'S
AGENDA OF LA RAZA SUPREMACY AND AN ILLEGAL IN EVERY AMERICAN JOB TO KEEP WAGES
DEPRESSED. THE LEGALS GET THE TAX BILLS FOR THE MEX WELFARE AND CRIME TIDAL
WAVE.
*
WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA'S OPEN BORDERS AGENDA WITH NARCOMEX:
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html
http://mexicanoccupation.blogspot.com/2011/05/wikileaks-exposed-obamas-la-raza-open.html
The Obama
administration has also cut worksite enforcement efforts by 70%, allowing
illegal immigrants to continue working in jobs that rightfully belong to
citizens and legal workers.
*
LA RAZA-OCCUPIED MEXIFORNIA – THE MEX GANG INFESTED WELFARE
STATE FOR ILLEGALS
Lou Dobbs Tonight
Monday, February 11, 2008
In California, League of United Latin American Citizens has
adopted a resolution to declare "California Del Norte" a sanctuary
zone for immigrants. The declaration urges the Mexican government to invoke its
rights under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo "to seek third‑nation neutral
arbitration of disputes concerning immigration laws and their
enforcement." We’ll have the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment