Monday, February 11, 2013

MARCH AGAINST OBAMA'S CORRUPTION, HISPANDERING and AMNESTY SELL OUT


Historic National Protests Against Obama Planned in 50 States on February 16
http://www.alipac.us/content/histori...ruary-16-1378/



 

REALITY… Obama is an abysmal failure. His only success is conning a nation over and over again and calling it “change”. He is Bush’s third and fourth failed terms.

“Though when President Obama claimed that the state of our union was “stronger,” one could only ask: for whom?” HOW ABOUT OBAMA’S CRIMINAL BANKSTER DONORS, AND LA RAZA PARTY BASE OF ILLEGALS???

OBAMA HAS SQUANDERED BILLIONS PROTECTING THE BORDERS OF MUSLIM DICTATORS WHILE PUSHING OUR UNDEFENDED BORDERS WITH NARCOMEX OPEN WIDER SO HE COULD BUILD  THE DEMS’ PARTY BASE of ILLEGALS.

HE HAS FILLED HIS ADMINISTRATION WITH BANKSTER-CONNECTED WHITE COLLAR CRIMINALS FROM WALL STREET TO ASSURE THE BANKS “I’m not here to punish banks!”. BANKSTER PROFITS AND CRIMES SOAR… SO DO FORECLOSURES.

DURING OBAMA’S FIRST TERM 2/3s OF ALL JOBS WENT TO IMMIGRANTS, BOTH LEGAL AND ILLEGAL. OBAMA SUED THE AMERICAN STATE OF ARIZONA, NOW GATEWAY TO THE AMERICAN SOUTHWEST FOR THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS, TO BLOCK E-VERIFY TO EASE MORE LA RAZA INTO OUR JOBS. HIS FIRST SEC. of (illegal) LABOR WAS LA RAZA SUPREMACIST HILDA SOLIS. HIS NOMINEE TO THE HIGH COURT SONIA SOTOMAYOR IS SIMPLY OBAMA IN A SKIRT WITH A LONG HISTORY OF SERVICING THE CORPORATE SPECIAL INTERESTS AS WELL AS BEING A LA RAZA PARTY MEMBER. SOTOMAYOR VOTED AGAINST IMPLEMENTING E-VERIFY NATIONWIDE. DURING OBAMA’S FIRST TERM, WORKPLACE ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS PROHIBITING THE EMPLOYMENT OF ILLEGALS PLUMMETED 70% AND IS EXPECTED TO BE NON-EXISTENT DURING HIS SECOND TERM.

 

OBAMA HANDS OVER AMERICAN TAX DOLLARS TO THE MEXICAN FASCIST PARTY of LA RAZA, WHICH NOW OPERATES OUT OF THE WHITE HOUSE UNDER CECILIA MUNOZ.

NOW OBAMA, AND HIS HAREM OF SOME OF THE MOST CORRUPT DEMS IN AMERICAN HISTORY, FEINSTEIN, BOXER, PELOSI, REID AND MENENDEZ ARE PUSHING FOR ONE OF THE BIGGEST CON JOBS PERPETRATED BY ANY PRESIDENT IN HISTORY… AMNESTY!

THE DEMS’ PROPAGANDA MACHINE CLAIMS PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP FOR 11 MILLION PRIMARILY MEXICANS. THERE ARE MORE THAN 40 MILLION MEXICANS ALREADY HERE LOOTING AND EAGER TO BRING UP THE REST OF THE FAMILY. NOT ONE OF THEM ARE INTERESTED IN BECOMING AMERICAN. THEY ARE LOOTERS AND OCCUPIERS FEEDING OFF THE AMERICA PEOPLE. CA  PAYS OUT $22 BILLION PER YEAR ON THE STATE LEVEL ALONE IN SOCIAL SERVICES TO ILLEGALS. COUNTIES PAY OUT  MORE WITH LOS ANGELES COUNTY PAYING OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS = 18 YEARS OF WELFARE. CA ALSO CAN CLAIM THAT NEARLY HALF OF ALL MURDERS IN THIS MEX-OCCUPIED STATE ARE BY MEXICAN GANGS. DO A SEARCH FOR MEXICAN GANGS “ETHNICALLY CLEANSING” THEIR HOODS IN LOS ANGELES AND COMPTON BY MURDERING BLACK AMERICANS. YOU WILL NOT HEAR A BLACK AMERICAN NAMED BARACK OBAMA OPEN HIS HISPANDERING MOUTH ABOUT THIS, OR THAT CA HAS THE LARGEST AND MOST EXPENSIVE PRISON SYSTEM IN THE NATION AND HALF THE INMATES ARE MEXICANS, OR THAT THE MEXICAN DRUG CARTELS NOW OPERATE IN 2,500 AMERICAN CITIES, OR THAT BARACK OBAMA OKAYED MEXICAN TRUCKS EASE OVER OUR BORDERS TO HAUL DRUGS AND HUMAN CARGO, SOMETHING THAT EVEN BUSH REFUSED TO DO!

BEHIND OUR BACKS, OBAMA HAS REPEATEDLY TAKEN BORDER GUARDS !OFF ! THE NARCOMEX BORDER AND CUT FUNDING TO SABOTAGE OUR NATIONAL SECURITY IN THE FACE OF THE LA RAZA MEXICAN INVASION. HIS DHS UNDER LA RAZA SUPREMACIST JANET NAPOLITANO IS NOW THE Dept. of Homeland Security = PATHWAY TO CITIZENSHIP and SOME AMERICAN’S JOB!

Obama recklessly claims America is ‘Stronger’ in State of the Union

 

Tuesday, February 12, 2013 - The Conscience of a Conservative by Henry D'Andrea

PHOENIX, February 12, 2013 - During Barack Obama’s first State of the Union address of his second term, the President claimed that the United States is seeing more economic growth and that as a nation we are “stronger” today than we were before.

Though when President Obama claimed that the state of our union was “stronger,” one could only ask: for whom?

No comments: