JUDICIAL WATCH:
It proves the Obama administration is willing to go to any extent - including gaming the courts - to continue stonewalling the full story of its lawless release of illegal aliens. Now, with the prison floodgates being thrown open to illegal aliens under the phony pretense of abiding by sequester cuts, it is more important that details of this threat to the public safety be revealed.
WIKILEAKS EXPOSES OBAMA’S AGENDA OF ASSAULTING OUR BORDERS, AMERICANS IN JOBS HE WANTS TO FILL WITH ILLEGALS
FIFTEEN
THINGS YOU SHOULD KNOW ABOUT LA RAZA “THE RACE”
by Michelle Malkin
Only in America could critics of a group called "The
Race" be labeled racists. Such is the triumph of left-wing identity
chauvinists, whose aggressive activists and supine abettors have succeeded in
redefining all opposition as "hate."
Both Barack Obama and
John McCain will speak this week in San Diego at the annual conference of the
National Council of La Raza, the Latino organization whose name is Spanish for,
yes, "The Race." Can you imagine Obama and McCain paying homage to a
group of white people who called themselves that? No matter. The
presidential candidates and the media have legitimized "The Race" as
a mainstream ethnic lobbying group and marginalized its critics as intolerant
bigots. The unvarnished truth is that the group is a radical ethnic nationalist
outfit that abuses your tax dollars and milks PC politics to undermine our
sovereignty.
According to DHS’s own reports, very little of our nation’s borders (Southwestern or otherwise) are secure, and gaining control is not even a goal of the department.
RASSMUSEN REPORT:
But if immigration reform legislation passes, just nine percent (9%) believe it is Very Likely the federal government will actually try to secure the border. That’s an important point because, even among supporters of comprehensive reform, 64% think border security should come before legalizing the status of those here illegally.
THOMAS PEREZ – LA RAZA SUPREMACIST
WHO IS OBAMA’S LATEST LA RAZA FASCIST
FOR SECRETARY of LABOR?
*
OBAMA
BUILDS THE LA RAZA WEFLARE STATE in AMERICA
EXPOSED! OBAMA BUILDS THE LA RAZA WELFARE STATE in AMERICA’S
OPEN BORDERS OFF THE BACKS OF AMERICANS (Legals)!
ONE OF MEXICO’S BIGGEST EXPORTS NEXT TO DRUGS AND CRIMINALS
ARE PREGNANT WOMEN. THEY HOP OUR BORDERS FOR “FREE” ANCHOR BABY BIRTHING AND THEN
18 YEARS OF WEFLARE.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY ALONE PUTS OUT $600 MILLION PER YEAR IN
WELFARE TO ILLEGALS, PRIMARILY ANCHOR BABY BREEDERS.
Did you know that U.S. law forbids the
admission of any immigrant who is likely to depend on public assistance? It's
right there in Section 212(a)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, first
passed in the 1950s and still the law today:
"Any alien who, in the opinion of the
consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of
the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of
status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible."
*
MEXICO
BANKRUPTS CALIFORNIA HOSPITALS - MEX CONSULATES URGE LOOTING OF LEGALS
While
the Obama Administration halts deportations to work on its secret
amnesty
plan, hospitals across the U.S. are getting stuck with the exorbitant tab of
medically treating illegal immigrants and some are finally demanding
compensation from the federal government.
OBAMA
and MEXICO LOOT PRIVATE ENTERPRISE HOSPITALS AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR “FREE”
HEALTHCARE FOR LA RAZA MEXICANS… What’s left for Americans (Legals)???
Newsmax
Can Legalizing
Immigrants Reduce Chaos?
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
02:04 PM
By: James Walsh
Four liberal Democrat U.S.
senators and four conservative Republican U.S. senators (three of the latter
from heavily Hispanic-populated states) have joined forces to reform the
nation’s immigration policy.
Labeled by the news media
as the Gang of Eight, they are Chuck Schumer, D-NY; Dick Durbin, D-Ill.; Robert
Menendez, D-N.J.; Michael Bennet, D-Colo.; John McCain, R-Ariz.; Lindsay
Graham, R-S.C.; Marco Rubio, R-Fla.; and Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.
On January 29, 2013, they
announced an endeavor to resolve the chaos surrounding enforcement of the
nation’s immigration laws.
President
Barack Obama responded to the Gang of Eight with his position on immigration,
which had Sen. Schumer suddenly announcing that “border security” is not “that
essential” to proposed legislation. Prior to Schumer’s disavowal, there had
been agreement on border security.
The Gang of Eight had said
that a path to citizenship should be offered to illegal aliens presently in the
country, but only after the government secures the southern border. Questions
remain regarding who will determine when the border is secure.
The
president and his Secretary of Homeland Security, Janet Napolitano, say the
southern border already is secure. Their assurances conflict with daily and
nightly border crossings by illegal aliens, drug smugglers, and previous
deportees, among them criminal gang members.
The New York Times reports
that aliens and drug smugglers cross the Southern Border nightly. On March 20,
2013, Homeland Security officials testified under oath before a U.S. House of
Representatives Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security that they had no
effective way to measure border security, nor will they have one “anytime in
the near future.”
Border security has long
been labeled a Republican position. As far back as 1986, Republican members of
Congress agreed to the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), after
Democrats promised “meaningful” border security and employer sanctions in
exchange for amnesty for 2.5 million illegal aliens. Congress never delivered
on border control or federal enforcement of employer sanctions.
The Gang of Eight proposes
that green cards offering legal permanent residency (LPR) be considered for
immigrants (documented and undocumented) with advanced degrees in STEM subjects
(science, technology, engineering, and mathematics).
Other proposals include a
tougher employer verification system to assure that companies hire only legal
or “legalizing” immigrants, among them entry-level workers; incentives for
companies that hire “legalizing” immigrants; and a guest farmhand program for seasonal
agricultural workers.
Republicans, with the
support of business and industry, can lead the legalizing of STEM immigrants
and guest workers. Republicans can propose modern guest worker legislation
covering skilled and unskilled workers for high-tech industries and agrarian
businesses.
Payment
of taxes and/or fines by illegal aliens may be no more than window dressing to
convince U.S. citizens that Congress is tough on immigration.
What criteria will be used
to determine taxes owed — yearly income, number of years in the United States,
valid identification of applicants? How will taxes be paid, especially by
low-skilled applicants? How will accuracy be determined on immigrant claims of
payment? How will the government deal with immigrant advocates of
“humanitarian” exemptions, when applicants can’t pay back taxes or fines? Watch
for Congress to cave and permit waivers, just like the Obamacare waivers.
The congressional
requirement that undocumented immigrants learn English is like mandating that
they pay back taxes and fines. Who will pay for immigrant-applicant English
classes, and who will determine if an applicant reads, writes, and speaks
English fluently? If learning English is mandated, then bilingual schooling and
business regulations can be eliminated. English, once again, would be the
official language of the United States of America.
For legalizing immigrants,
what degree of U.S. history and government knowledge will be sufficient, as
many schools teach questionable U.S. history, heritage, and government? Who
will determine the course matter?
Another red herring in
proposed immigration legislation has legalizing immigrants sent to the back of
the line behind legal immigrant applicants. After a bookkeeping entry, will
legalizing immigrants be free to reside in the United States with the rights
and privileges of legal permanent residents (LPR)? What happens if a legalizing
immigrant is involved in criminal matters or civil litigation that challenges
the moral turpitude required of LPR applicants?
Will legalizing
undocumented foreign nationals occur at the signing of a comprehensive
immigration reform bill, such as that envisioned by the president? Might such a
law entitle legalizing immigrants not just to the rights and privileges of LPRs
but to the rights and privileges of U.S. citizens?
Republican leaders may be
falling away from border security as a prerequisite for legalizing immigrants.
If Republicans hold to their position requiring border security prior to the
processing of illegal aliens, Democrats are unlikely to agree, and
comprehensive immigration reform may not pass.
Democrats apparently prefer
chaos to enforcing immigration laws.
James H. Walsh was associate
general counsel with the U.S. Department of Justice Immigration and
Naturalization Service from 1983 to 1994. Read more reports from James Walsh — Click Here Now.
No comments:
Post a Comment